• No results found

A Comparative Study of Serum Cholinesterase and Liver Function Tests in Liver Disease

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Share "A Comparative Study of Serum Cholinesterase and Liver Function Tests in Liver Disease"

Copied!
115
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

1

Dissertation on

“A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SERUM CHOLINESTERASE

AND LIVER FUNCTION TESTS IN LIVER DISEASE”

Submitted in partial fulfilment for the Degree of

M.D GENERAL MEDICINE

BRANCH – I

INSTITUTE OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

MADRAS MEDICAL COLLEGE

THE TAMIL NADU DR. MGR MEDICAL UNIVERSITY

CHENNAI - 600003

(2)

2

CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that the dissertation entitled

“A COMPARATIVE

STUDY OF SERUM CHOLINESTERASE AND LIVER FUNCTION

TESTS IN LIVER DISEASE.”

is a Bonafide original work done by

Dr. SHANMUKAM.V

, post graduate student, Institute of Internal

Medicine, Madras Medical College, Chennai-03, under our guidance and

supervision in partial fulfilment of regulations of the Tamilnadu Dr. M.G.R

Medical University for the award of M.D. Degree Branch I (General

Medicine) during the academic period from 2016 to 2019.

PROF. Dr. P. VASANTHI, M.D. PROF. Dr. S. TITO, M.D.

Guide and Supervisor, Director (i/c) and Professor of Medicine, Professor of Medicine, Institute of Internal Medicine,

Institute of Internal Medicine, Madras Medical College & RGGGH, Madras Medical College & RGGGH, Chennai- 600003

Chennai – 600003

PROF.DR. S.RAGHUNANTHANAN, M.D, Dr.R.JAYANTHI,M.D.,FRCP

CO – Guide (GLAS).

Professor of Medicine – IMCU, DEAN

(3)

3

DECLARATION

I hereby solemnly declare that the dissertation entitled “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SERUM CHOLINESTERASE AND LIVER FUNCTION TESTS IN LIVER DISEASE” is done by me at Institute

of Internal Medicine, Madras Medical College & Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai during August 2017 to January 2018 under the guidance and supervision of PROF. Dr. P. VASANTHI, M.D, Institute Of Internal Medicine, Madras Medical College, Chennai-03. This dissertation is submitted to The Tamilnadu Dr. M.G.R Medical University, Chennai towards the partial fulfilment of requirement for the award of M.D. Degree in General Medicine (Branch I)

Place: Dr. SHANMUKAM.V Date: Post Graduate Student M.D. General Medicine, Institute of Internal Medicine,

(4)

4

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I would like to thank our respected Dean, Madras Medical College, Prof. Dr. R. JAYANTHI, M.D, FRCP(GLAS), for her kind permission to use the hospital resources for this study.

I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my bellowed Professor and Director, Institute of Internal Medicine Prof. Dr. S. TITO M.D., for his guidance and encouragement.

With extreme gratitude, I express my indebtedness to my respected Chief and teacher Professor Dr. P. VASANTHI., M.D., for her motivation, advice and valuable criticism, which enabled me to complete this work.

I would also like to thank Professor DR. S. RAGHUNANTHANAN. M.D for his guidance and valuable criticism.

I would like to express my gratitude to my former Chief and teacher PROF. Dr. R. SABARATNAVEL.M. D and former Director, Institute of Internal Medicine, PROF. Dr. S. MAYILVAHANAN., M.D.

I am extremely thankful to Assistant Professor of Medicine Dr.JACINTH PREETHI, M.D., and Dr. A. PRIYATHARICINI, M.D., for their co-operation and guidance.

I express my heartfelt gratitude to my Postgraduate colleagues Dr. JAINY, Dr. SABARISH, and Dr. NOKCHUR IMCHEN for their constant support and encouragement.

I am immensely grateful to the generosity shown by the patients who participated in this study.

(5)

5

CONTENTS

S NO TITLE PAGE NO

1. INTRODUCTION 6

2. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 9

3. REVIEW OF LITERATURE 10

4. MATERIALS AND METHODS 51

5. OBSERVATION AND RESULTS 56

6. DISCUSSION 84

7. CONCLUSION OF THE STUDY 90

8. LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY 91

9. BIBLIOGRAPHY 93

10.

ANNEXURES

i. PROFORMA

ii. ETHICAL COMMITTEE APPROVAL iii. PLAGIARISM SCREENSHOT

iv. PLAGIARISM CERTIFICATE v. INFORMATION SHEET vi. CONSENT FORM

vii. MASTER CHART

(6)

6

(7)

7

INTRODUCTION

Liver being the largest vital organ, has wide range of functions. Liver disease are one of the major causes of mortality in India and also worldwide. Biochemical tests of assessing the liver function, includes measurements of serum bilirubin, serum protein, serum albumin, serum aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase and alkaline phosphatase. These tests often show abnormal results in patient with clinical conditions other than liver dysfunction.

Serum bilirubin can be raised because of increased erythrocyte lysis other than failure of hepatic clearance. Serum transaminase can be raised due to increased release from non-liver tissue sources. Albumin produced by the hepatocyte are synthesized by polyribosomes bound to the rough endoplasmic reticulum before secreted into plasma. Decrease in albumin reflects decreased hepatic synthesis, although changes in plasma volume and losses, for instance in to gut or urine, may contribute to hypoalbuminemia. Therefore, there comes a need for a test, which should be specific as well as sensitive for liver disease

(8)

8

(9)

9

AIMS & OBJECTIVE

- To estimate the level of serum cholinesterase and liver function tests in both liver disease cases and non-liver disease cases and comparing them. - To estimate the correlation between the serum cholinesterase level with

other liver function tests within the liver disease group.

(10)

10

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

The very purpose of this study to evaluate the serum cholinesterase activity as a test of liver function. The test had considerable merit, as it appeared to be a direct test of liver function which did not depend on any abnormalities of the protein fraction.

HISTORY:

Estimation of the level of activity of the cholinesterase found in serum was first suggested by McArdle (1940), as a useful means for differentiating hepatic from post – hepatic jaundice1

In 1946, Brauer and Root ² and in 1947 Ellis, sanders, Shirley and Bodansky ³ showed that Serum cholinesterase level was lowered when rat livers were damaged by carbon tetrachloride.

Brauer& Root⁴ also found, rise in plsma cholinesterase initially, when administering carbon tetrachloride to dogs, and after one to four hours, it dropped below normal.

The latter can be explained by the fact, that there is outpouring of the enzyme, which results in rise in level.

(11)

11

Croft & Richter ⁶ observed serum cholinesterase rises during muscle exercise.,

Bauer⁷ & many others ⁸ ,⁹ ,10 ,11 ,12 ,13 ,1⁴ ,1⁵ ,1⁶ observed that serum cholinesterase decreased in liver disease and normal in obstructive jaundice.

Any disease producing cachexia has decreased serum cholinesterase level was observed by Schifrin, Tuchman and Antopol10‚13.

McArdle1 reported normal cholinesterase activity of serum in diabetes and hyperthyroidism.

Faber 17‚18 noted that low serum albumin was associated with low cholinesterase.

LIVER DISEASE:

Liver is the largest gland in humans. Liver weighs about 1500g and 5% of body weight of a new born. The most common liver diseases are Alcoholic liver disease, Infective hepatitis, Obstructive Jaundice, Liver abscess, Liver metastasis etc.,

(12)

12

FUNCTION OF LIVER:

1. Carbohydrate, fat and protein metabolism 2. Bile production and secretion

3. Storage of glycogen 4. Protein synthesis

5. Production of bile pigments and Heparin 6. Erythropoiesis (in fetus)

HISTOLOGY OF LIVER:

HISTOLOGICAL STRUCTURE OF

LIVER

STROMA

RETICULAR NETWORK

CONNECTIVE TISSUE CAPSULE

TRABECULAE

PARENCHYMA

BLOOD VESSELS

BILE DUCT

(13)

13 CONCEPT OF HEPATIC LOBULES:

CLASSIC LOBULE

:

Structure and functional unit of the organ is classic lobule. It is hexagonal in shape. It has a vein at the center, which is the central vein and portal tracts in the periphery.

PORTAL LOBULE

:
(14)

14

HEPATIC ACINUS (ACINUS OF RAPPAPORT):

(15)

15

Hepatocyte cells are arranged in cords oriented around the central hepatic vein. Vascular sinusoids are present between these cords. Fenestrated endothelial cells line their sinuosity and form space of Disse.

Kupffer cells belonging to monocyte family are found in the space. Stellate cells involved in vitamin A storage are found scattered in this space. They are responsible for forming collagen when there is liver inflammation.

(16)

16 ALCOHOLIC LIVER DISEASE:

INCIDENCE:

Worldwide mortality form alcoholic liver disease is estimated to be 1,50,000/year. 90-100% among heavy drinkers will develop hepatic steatosis in 10years. Only 10-30% develops steato hepatitis and 8-20% will develop cirrhosis in the same period.

Liver cirrhosis develops in 6 – 14% of those persons who consume greater than 60-80g alcohol, daily for man and greater than 20g, daily for women.

Despite cessation of alcohol use, only 10% will have normalization of liver histology and liver function tests

PROGRESSION IN ALCOHOLIC LIVER DISEASE

Normal liver 90 to 100 percent Fatty liver

10 to 35 percent 80 to 20 percent

Alcoholic hepatitis cirrhosis

(17)

17

BEVERAGES AND THEIR ALCOHOL CONTEST

1. 12 g of alcohol present in 12oz of Beer 2. 12 g of alcohol present in 50oz of Wine

(18)

18 PATHOGENESIS:

Pathophysiology of Alcohol induced liver injury

Alteration in membrane fluidity

Fatty acid ethylesterss, phosphatidylethanol

Alcohol

Lipid peroxidation

Toll like receptor heat shock protein

Decreased

Induces CYP2E1 Hydroxy ethylradicals

Aldehyde Iron overload

Perivenular hypoxic

Endotoxemic

SAM synthesis vitA & VitE Antioxidant

defense Mitochondria

(19)

19

CENTRILOBULAR HYPOXIA:

Chronic alcohol ingestion have demonstrated susceptibility of the hepatic pericentral area to hypoxemic due to parallel competitive O2 consumption by ethanol metabolism.

NEUTROPHIL INFILTRATION AND ACTIVATION:

 The characteristic pathologic hallmarks of alcohol hepatitis infiltration of neutrophils

 Both IL-8 and arachidonic acid metabolite acts as a neutrophil chemoattractant

 Kupffer cell secreting inflammatory mediators also have a role in ethanol induced hepatic injury.

ANTIGENIC ADDUCT FORMATION:

Acetaldehyde and hydroxy ethyl radicals bind covalently to protein present in the hepatocytes, thereby forming adducts that are antigenic

ACTION OF INJURIOUS CYTOKINES:

 Many studies have demonstrated increased levels of the proinflammatory cytokines, TNFα and IL - 6

(20)

20

COFACTORS THAT POTENTIATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF ALCOHOL LIVER DISEASE.

AGE:

Early age alcohol consumption is more likely associated with alcoholism later in life.

GENDER:

 Overall prevalence is higher among men than women.

 Women are more prone to alcohol related injury and fibrosis then men, for the same amount of the alcohol consumption.

HEPATITIS C INFCETION:

 14 % to 36% individual with Alcohol liver disease also have chronic infection with hepatitis C.

 Increases the risk of HCC.

HBV INFECTION:

Datas suggest that chronic HBV infection and alcohol consumption increases the risk for HCC.

MEDICATIONS:

(21)

21 EXCESS IRON:

Iron and alcohol generate reactive O2 species that promote lipid peroxidation of cell membrane and further damage to cellular integrity occurs.

INFECTIVE HEPATITIS:

HEPATITIS A:

It is usually a self-limited illness that does not become chronic disease. Fulminant hepatic failure occurs in less than 1 percent of cases.

HAV is a member of the genus Hepato virus in the family picornoviridae.

It is usually transmitted by the faeco oral route.

PATHOGENESIS:

Hepatic injury occurs because of the host immune response to HAV. Viral replication occurs in the hepatocyte cytoplasm. Hepatocyte damage and destruction of infected hepatocytes is mediated by human leukocyte antigen – restricted, HAV- specific CD8+ T lymphocytes and natural killer cells. Interferon- gamma appears to have a central role in promoting clearance of infected hepatocytes.

HEPATITIS B:

(22)

22 PATHOGENESIS:

The pathogenesis of HBV related liver disease is largely due to immune mediated mechanism. It can also case direct cytotoxic liver injury.

IMMUNE MEDIATED LIVER INJURY:

HBV related liver disease is generally thought to be related to cytotoxic T cell mediated lysis of infected hepatocytes.

Patient with chronic hepatitis B, who clear HBeAg have more vigorous cytotoxic T lymphocyte response to HBV antigen than those who remain HBe Ag positive.

Fulminant hepatitis B is believed to be due to massive immune mediated lysis of infected hepatocytes.

DIRECT CYTOTOXIC LIVER INJURY:

There is no correlation between viral load and the severity of liver disease. Direct cytopathic liver injury can occur when the viral load is very high as in fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis.

HEPATITIS C:

An estimated amount of 130-170 million people is affected by Hepatitis C infection worldwide.

Around 75-85% will develop chronic infection.

(23)

23

Around 5 – 20 percent people develops cirrhosis over the course of CLD

1 – 5percent will develop hepatocellular carcinoma.

HCV is a single stranded RNA virus, which belongs to Genus Hepa – C virus and family. Flavi – viridae.

It has high spontaneous mutation rate. There are 11 geno types with 90 sub types.

PATHOGENESIS:

DIRECT CELL INJURY DUE TO VIRAL REPLICATION

Geno type 1 – high viral application

Geno type 1 b – more progressive liver disease

IMMUNE MEDICATED CELL INJURY:

CD8+T lymphocyte found in portal, periportal and lobular areas in patients with hepatitis C infection.

FACTORS PROMOTING CIRRHOSIS IN HCV INFECTION:

Male sex

Age over 40years at the time of infection

Alcohol use

(24)
(25)

25 OBSTRUCTIVE JAUNDICE

BENJAMIN CLASSIFICATION 1983

Type 1: complete obstruction

It has classical symptoms with biochemical changes.  Tumors: Ca head of pancreas

 ligation of the common Bile duet  cholangio carcinoma

 parenchymal liver disease

Type 2: Intermittent obstruction

Symptoms and biochemical parameters changes but jaundice may or may not be present.

 Choledocholithiasis  Periampullary tumor  Duodenal diverticula  Choledochal cyst

(26)

26 Type 3: chronic incomplete obstruction:

Pathological changes are present in bile duct and liver with or without classical symptoms

 Strictures of the CBD  Congenital

 Traumatic

 Sclerosis cholangitis  Post radio therapy

 Stenosed biliary enteric anastomosis  Cystic fibrosis

 Chronic pancreatitis

 Stenosis of the sphincter of oddi

Type 4: segmental obstruction

One or more segment of intra hepatic biliary tract should be obstructed  Traumatic

(27)

27 HEPATIC FIBROSIS AND CIRRHOSIS:

Hepatic fibrosis can be defined as a reversible wound healing response characterized by the accumulation of extra cellular matrix or ‘scar’, it follows chronic liver disease but not self-limited.

Hepatic stellate cells activation is a main central event in hepatic fibrosis.

‘Not only is hepatic fibrosis reversible, but it is also increasingly clear that cirrhosis may be reversible as well. The exact stage at which fibrosis / cirrhosis becomes truly irreversible and its biologic determinants, are not known19

20 types of collagens are identified in the liver. Type 1, 3, 5, 11 are largely present in the capsule, blood vessels and in the portal triad.

Type 4 collagens are present in the space of Disse as delicate strands.

In fibrosis, deposition of type1 and 3 collages results in septae formation. Blood shunting occurs due to vascular channels formation in these septae. Irrespective of etiology, cirrhosis is initiated by hepato cellular necrosis followed by collagen gets deposited in the space of Disse

Fenestrations in the Sinusoidal cells are obliterated

No exchange of solutes between plasma and hepatocytes

Secretory function of liver gets affected.

(28)

28

Perisinusoidal cells and stellate cells acquire myofibrils which cause increased vascular resistance in the liver.

(29)

29 CAUSE OF FIBROSIS AND CIRRHOSIS

PRESINUSOIDAL FIBROSIS

I. Idiopathic portal fibrosis II. Schistosomiasis

PARENCHYMAL FIBROSIS

 DRUGS AND TOXIC

 Alcohol  Methotrexate  Vitamin A  Isoniazid  Aminodarone  Perhexiline maleate  α methyldopa

INFECTIONS

 chronic hepatitis B and C  brucellosis

(30)

30 AUTO IMMUNE DISEASE:

Auto immune hepatitis

METABOLIC GENETIC DISEASE  Wilson disease

 Genetic hemochromatosis  α,1 anti trypsin deficiency

 carbohydrate metabolism disorder  lipid metabolism disorder

 urea cycle defects  amino acid metabolism  porphyria

 bile acid disorder

BILIARY OBSTRUCTION:

 primary biliary cirrhosis  secondary biliary cirrhosis  cystic fibrosis

(31)

31 IDIOPATHIC/ MISCELLENOUS:

 Non alcoholic steato hepatitis  Indian childhood cirrhosis  Granulomatous liver disease  Polycystic liver disease

POST SINUSOIDAL FIBRONS

 Sinusoidal obstruction syndromes (venoocculusive disease)

CLINICAL FEATURE OF CIRRHOSIS

 Anorexia, wasting, and easy fatiguability  Jaundice

 Hyper dynamic circulation  Spider neavi

 Palmar erythema  White nails  Hypogonadism  Gynecomastia

 Enlargement of alcoholic (alcoholic)  Ascites, peripheral edema

(32)

32 COMPLICATION OF CIRRHOSIS

1. PORTAL HYPERTENSION

 Portal hypertensive gastropathy  Gastroesophageal varices  Splenomegaly

 Hypersplenism  Ascites

 Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis  Hepatorenal syndrome type1, 2  Hepatic encephalopathy

 Portopulmonary hypertension  Hepatopulmonary syndrome  Malnutrition

COAGULOPATHY

 Factor deficiency  Fibrinolysis

 Thrombocytopenia

BONE DISEASE

(33)

33 HEMATOLOGIC ABNORMALITIES

 Hemolysis  Anemia

(34)

34 LIVER FUNCTION TEST

Routine liver function test includes

1. Serum albumin

Albumin is the major constituent of plasma protein with concentration of 3.5 – 5.0 g/dl

Liver synthesis around 12g albumin per day, around 25% of total hepatic protein synthesis

FUNCTIONS

1. Colloidal osmotic pressure 2. Transport function

3. Nutritive function 4. Buffering function

Hypoalbuminemia occur when there is damage to hepatocytes and decreased ability to synthesize albumin

However other causes of Hypoalbuminemia - Enteropathy

- Malnutrition - Kidney disease

- Hormonal disturbances

(35)

35

Serum albumin can be used for assessing the prognosis in chronic liver disease Pre albumin, which is also synthesized by liver, has shorter half life

PROTHROMBIN TIME:

Prothrombin Time is a measure the rate of formation of thrombin from prothrombin.

This is dependent on factor II, VII, IX, &X, and other factors along the extrinsic pathway. Thus, prothrombin time is a measure of hepatocyte synthetic function.

Normal value: 10.9 – 12.5seconds Prothrombin time can also be increased by

i. Use of anticoagulants ii. Deficiency of vit K iii. DIC

iv. Clotting factor deficiencies

(36)

36

TESTS FOR HEPATO CELLULAR DAMAGE AND EXCRETORY FUNCTION OF LIVER

I. AST (SGOT) – Aspartate aminotransferase II. ALT (SGPT) – alanine aminotransferase

ALT enzyme found in the hepatocyte cytoplasm

But, AST found in organs like skeletal muscle, brain, kidney, myocardium, RBC, pancreas, in the cytoplasm and mitochondria

NORMAL VALUES:

ALT – 10-55 U/L

AST- 10-40 U/L

In patients with elevated AST levels disproportionate to ALT levels, extrahepatic origin of this enzyme must be excluded. Both enzymes are high in severe rhabdomyolysis.

In initial phase of hepatocellular damage, enzymes elevate, but correlates poorly with severity of liver injury.

So, it becomes not a good predictor of the outcome in liver disease.

Ureamia can cause a falsely low serum levels of AST

AST/ALT ratio:

1. Alcoholic hepatitis - ≥ 2 2. Cirrhosis - > 1

3. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis - ≤ 1

(37)

37 MARKERS OF CHOLESTASIS:

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE(ALP):

It is a hydrolase enzyme responsible for removing phosphate groups, from many types of molecule including nucleotides, alkaloids and proteins.

It is present in all tissue, particularly concentrated in liver, bile duct, kidney bones, placenta, and intestinal mucosa.

Three Isoenzymes of ALP:

1. ALP-I- present in Intestine

2. ALP-L- tissue, nonspecific (Liver , bone, kidney) 3. ALP-p-Specific in placenta

Half life- 5 – 7 days

Normal level-35 – 130U/L

CONDITIONS WITH RAISED LEVELS:

1. Biliary obstruction 2. Osteoblastic bone tumor 3. Hepatitis

(38)

38 9. Hyperthyroidism

10.Hyperparathyroidism 11.Myocardial infarction 12.Pregnancy

Wilson’s disease can be associated with very low undetectable levels of alkaline phosphatase.

“BY STANDER PHENOMENON”: Values are raised as a result of nonspecific hepatitis in Hodgkin disease and malignancies of kidney, but without direct liver involvement.

“REGAN ISOENZYME”: ALP levels are raised in patients with malignancy but without bone/liver involvement

GAMMA GLUTAMYL TRANSPEPTIDASE (GGTP):

It is microsomal enzyme, formed in hepatocyte, biliary epithelium, kidney, pancreas, heart, lung, brain, and spleen.

Normal: 0-30 U/L

Values are raised in cholestasis GGT/ALP > 2.5 suggest alcoholism 5’ NUCLEOTIDASE:

It is formed in liver, pancreas, blood vessels, brain and myocardium.

(39)

39

Although, it is elevated in cholestasis but lags behind elevations of GGT and ALP.

BILIRUBIN:

Synthesis of bilirubin

Hemoglobin Heme

Biliverdin

Biliverdin reductase

Bilirubin

(RED YELLOW)

(GREEN)

NADPH+ H+

NADP+ H2O2

CO

Globlin Amino acid pool ( Ring Open)

Heme- oxygenase system (NADPH,Cytohromic C&O2) O2

(40)

40

[ Normal value < 1.1 g/dl]

Bilirubin is fractionated in to direct and indirect bilirubin

DIRECT BILIRUBIN:

1. Also called conjugated bilirubin 2. Water soluble

3. Make up less than 10% 4. Excreted in urine

INDIRECT BILIRUBIN:

1. Also called as Unconjugated bilirubin 2. Lipid soluble

(41)

41

CAUSES OF INCREASED INDIRECT BILIRUBIN

1. Hemolysis

2. Ineffective erythropoiesis 3. Hematoma resolution 4. Rhabdomyolysis

CAUSES OF INCREASED DIRECT BILIRUBIN:

1. Hepatitis

2. Obstructive jaundice 3. Cirrhosis of liver 4. Metastatic liver disease

Conjugated hyperbilirubinemia cannot differentiate hepatocellular liver injury from biliary obstruction.

Since, serum bilirubin indicates prognosis in liver cirrhosis, acute liver failure, alcoholic hepatitis, and primary biliary cirrhosis, It is incorporated in CHILD PUGH and MELD scoring system

PROGNOSTIC SCORING USED IN LIVER CIRRHOSIS

I. Child Turcotte Pugh classification (CTP) II. Model for end stage liver disease (MELD) 1. CHILD TURCOTTE PUGH SCORE (CTP)

(42)

42

(43)

43

CHILD PUGH CLASSES AND THEIR SURGICAL OUTCOMES:

Class A- well compensated cirrhosis

 There is only moderate increase in surgical risk

Class B and C

 There is substantial increase in surgical risk

 In child class C surgery should be done only in life threatening conditions example incarcerated hernia

 Extreme care is essential in patients undergoing surgery.  Complication should be treated before elective surgery

MODEL FOR ENDSTAGE LIVER DISEASE (MELD)

MELD scoring system is based on serum bilirubin, serum creatinine and INR value

(44)

44

ADVANTAGES OF MELD SCORING SYSTEM OVER CTP

 Variables in CTP lack reproductivity and consistency  Patients are classified only into three categories in CTP  Patients with severe decompensation are not quantified  CTP prone to subjective variations

Although MELD score is advantageous over CTP scoring system, CTP scoring is used in our study to grade the severity of chronic liver disease.

CHOLINESTERASES:

Cholinesterase are a group of enzymes preferable splitting choline and thiocholinester

There are two types of cholinesterase

Acetyl cholinesterase Serum or butyrl cholinesterase Or

(45)

45 ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE (AchE):

If not for cholinesterase, which are a family of enzymes known to catalyze the hydrolysis of acetylcholine to choline and acetic acid, thereby impeding the neurotransmitter ability to signal contraction – skeletal muscle would to incapable of relaxation²⁰ (Pohanka, 2011).

AchE is structurally determined to have much narrower substrate specificity than BchE (Butyrl cholinesterase), as they specifically bind to Ach.

The existence of large aromatic residue from the volume of the AchE aromatic gorge creates a narrow pathway, allowing for higher selectivity of the enzyme at its active site21 (Sussman et al, 1991).

This enzyme would require more positive charged substrate or inhibitor than BchE

SITES:

RBC, CNS, PNS and in MUSCLES

MAJOR PROPERTIES:

 High turnover

 High affinity for acetylcholine  Low affinity for non-cholinester

(46)

46

SERUM CHOLINESTERASE (PSEUDO (OR) BUTYRL CHOLINESTERASE):

BChE (Butyrl cholinesterase) more commonly found in the liver and serum of the organisms²².

BChE is known to improve the hydrolysis rate of cocaine, protect the mice from cocaine’s toxic effects, and protect the human body from OPC compounds, suggestive of detoxification role in the body²³,²⁴ ‚².

BChE has a wider active site than AchE, it has lesser aromatic residues lining the catalytic gorge and therefore is more voluminous and easily accomodative for various substrate, specifically for butyrlcholine (Nicolet et al,2003²⁶ .

HALF LIFE 12 days

SERUM CHOLINESTERSE IN VARIOUS PHYSIOLOGICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS:

Many investigators 18,27,28,29 have studied serum cholinesterase in healthy people and have stated the wide range of variation in enzyme concentration from person to person

Difference in enzyme activity did not correlate with age, sex, weight, height or surface area.

(47)

47 LOW SERUM CHOLINESTERASE

1. LIVER DISEASE AND DISEASE OF THE BILIARY SYSTEM: when hepatic parenchyma deceased, the serum cholinesterase decrease, almost invariably. This finding was observed by Antopol et al27

Depression is more marked in patient with CLD, such as cirrhosis than in patients with acute condition such as viral hepatitis, ascending cholangitis etc.

Serial studies of serum cholineterase in both acute and chronic disease have shown that, changes in its concentration closely reflect changes in the hepatocellular function.

When compared with other liver function tests (serum albumin, serum bilirubin, SGPT, SGOT, total protein), none appeared to mirror the changing status of the hepatic parenchyma as sensitively as did the serum cholinesterase.

Normal levels of serum cholinesterase activity were found in patients suffering with obstructive jaundice, unless complicated by considerable hepatic parenchymal involvement.

2. MALNUTRITION AND CHRONIC DEBILITATING DISEASE: Low levels have been formed in blood from patients, who were mal nourished, as a result of starvation, anorexia or any chronic inflammatory disease.

(48)

48 3. ANEMIA

Many authors have commented upon low level of serum cholinesterase in various type of anemia’s such as, pernicious anemia, anemia due to celiac sprue, cooley’s anemia, anemia due to blood loss, and anemia of chronic infection.

4. OPC poisoning and drugs acting through enzyme inhibition.

5. Drugs such as caffeine, theophylline, aresenochlonline, morphine, desomorphine, codeine, phenothiazine derivatives, procaine hydrochloride, etc., are known to decrease cholinesterase activities in serum 31,6,32,33,34. The mechanism is not known.

6. European studies shows that there is a prevalence of about 3- 4% of

congenital serum cholinesterase deficiency 35

7. Serum cholinesterase is found to be decreased in some community people in southern India (e.g Arya vysya chettiar)44

Disease state in which serum cholinesterase is normal to high

 Myasthenia gravis36  Bronchial asthma³⁷ ‚³⁸  Epilepsy 28,30

Hyperthyroiudism38,29,30  Diabetes milletus 28,30

(49)

49

Conditions in which serum cholinesterase activity is high

1. Nephrosis38,18:

Elevated level of cholinesterase in the serum of patients with nephrotic syndrome have been found by several investigators. One of the speculation is that the high level of serum cholinesterase in nephrosis reflects on increased and maximal effect of liver to synthesis new proteins.

Since the size of cholinesterase molecule is over twice the size of the albumin molecule, it does not pass through the glomerular membrane and not dissipated in the urine.

2. Exercise

Croft and Richter6 reported, the vigorous muscular exercise of short duration cause a transient increase in serum cholinesterase, which returned to normal after rest.

(50)

50

MATERIALS

AND

(51)

51 MATERIALS AND METHODS:

SOURCE OF DATA:

Patients who were admitted in the Institute of Internal Medicine, Madras Medical College and Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai-600003

SAMPLE SIZE - 150

Group I : Liver disease patients- 75

Group II: Non Liver disease patients – 75

STUDY DESIGN:

Hospital based cross sectional study

STUDY DURATION: 6 months(Aug 2017 – Jan 2018)

INCLUSION CRITERIA:

Patients with any liver disease like infective Hepatitis, Liver cirrhosis, Obstructive Jaundice, Liver metastasis, Liver abscess were included.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA FOR BOTH GROUPS:

A. Patients with age <20 or > 70 years B. Acute abdominal disease

C. Chronic Infection

(52)

52 F. Organophosphorus poisoning

G. Exposure to Succinylcholine, Cocaine, codeine and morphine H. Acute myocardial infarction.

DATA COLLECTION AND METHODS:

After selection, patients were subjected to thorough history taking and clinical examination. Following Investigations were performed

1. Serum cholinesterase – DGKC method 2. Total and direct bilirubin – DMSO method45

3. Alanine aminotransferase- NADH, Kinetic UV, method IFCC45 4. Aspartate aminotransferase- NADH, kinetic UV method, IFCC45 5. Total protein – Biuret method45

6. Alkaline phosphatase-p- Nitrophenylphosphate, kinetic method DGKC 45 7. Serum albumin- Bromocresol Green method45

8. Prothrombin time and INR 9. Ultrasonography of abdomen

SERUM CHOLINESTERASE ANALYSIS:

(53)

53 PRINCIPLE:

Cholinesterase hydrolyses butyrlthiocholine under release of butyric acid and thiocholine. Thiocholine reduces yellow potassium hexacyanoferrate( III) to colorless potassium hexacyanoferrate(II). The decrease of absorbance is measured at 405nm

Butyrlthiocholine + H2o Thiocholine + butyrate

2 Thiocholine+ 2[ fe( CN)6]3- + H2o choline+ 2[fe(CN)6]4-+ H2o

REAGENTS:

Components and concentration

R1: Pyrophosphate pH 7.6 95mmol/L

Potassium hexacyanoferrate(III) 2.5mmol/L

R2: Butyrlcholine 75mmol/L Fresh and non hemolyzed serum was used for assay

About 20 microlitres of the sample was used with 1ml of the reagent and absorbance was first read at 15 seconds and then at 45 seconds and results were calculated by the formula

Activity in U/L = Absorbance/ 30 seconds * factor

Factor = [ TV* 1000*2] ÷ [ 14.64 * SV*P]

TV – Total reaction volume in ml SV- sample volume in ml

(54)

54 14.64 = millimoles absorption

Coefficient of 5 thio- 2 nitro benzoic acid at 405nm

P- Cuvette pathlength in cm

2= conversion from absorbance per second to absorbance per minute

Reference Range at 37 degree Men – [ 4620-11500 U/L]

Women- [ 3930-10800 U/L]

STATISTICAL METHODS USED:

The data was analyzed using SPSS software. Pearson correlation coefficient and P value were calculated to find the correlation and the statistical significance respectively.

P< 0.05 – Significant P> 0.05 – not significant

P < 0.0001 – highly significant

(55)

55

OBSERVATIONS

AND

RESULTS

(56)

56 OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS:

Liver disease patients: Total no.of cases- 75

1 Chronic liver disease 50

2 Infective Hepatitis 10

3 Obstructive Jaundice 10

[image:56.595.107.459.146.293.2]

4 Liver metastasis 5

Table 1 showing distribution of Patients of liver diseases

Non liver disease patients – Total No.of cases- 75

1 Acute respiratory infection 17

2 CAD 8

3 Cellulitis 6

4 Chronic kidney disease 5

5 COPD 16

6 Dermatitis 9

7 Anasarca 9

8 Bone disease 5

[image:56.595.204.427.376.623.2]
(57)
[image:57.595.130.505.107.359.2]

57

Table 3 : ETIOLOGY OF CHRONIC LIVER DISEASE

ETIOLOGY FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Alcohol 38 76

Alcohol + HbSAg positive 6 12

Alcohol + HCV 1 2

HbSAg positive 2 4

HCV 1 2

Others 2 4

Total 50 100

(58)
[image:58.595.117.539.125.684.2]

58 Table 4 :

AGE DISTRIBUTION:

age group Frequency Percent

20-30 Years 20 13.3

31-40 Years 31 20.7

41-50 Years 42 28.0

51-60 Years 33 22.0

Above 60 Years 24 16.0

Total 150 100.0

INTERPRETATION:

The above table depicts the percentage of the age group of the patients and

the maximum percentage is in 41-50 years (28%)

13%

20%

28%

22%

16%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

20-30 Years 31-40 Years 41-50 Years 51-60 Years Above 60 Years

AGE GROUP

(59)

59

[image:59.595.106.542.333.595.2]

Table 5:

SEX DISTRIBUTION:

Gender Frequency Percent

Male 93 62.0

Female 57 38.0

Total 150 100.0

INTERPRETATION:

The above table depicts the percentage of gender .The maximum percentage is

male(62%).

62%

38%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Male Female

GENDER

(60)
[image:60.595.70.562.85.409.2]

60

Table 6 : DISTRIBUTION OF ALCOHOLICS

Group

Total (chronic

liver disease)

( Infective hepatitis)

(obstructive jaundice)

(Liver metastasis)

Non Liver disease

DRINKING ALCOHOL

No

Count 5 8 7 3 58 81 % within

group

10.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 77.3% 54.0%

Yes

Count 45 2 3 2 17 69 % within

group

90.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 22.7% 46.0% Total

Count 50 10 10 5 75 150 % within

group

(61)
[image:61.595.106.528.70.270.2]

61

Table 7: COMPARISON OF MEANS OF LABORATORY PARAMETERS IN BOTH GROUPS

Variables N Mean Std.

Deviation Std. Error Mean

I value p value

Serum cholinesterase U/L Non liver disease

75 6494.21 1269.16 146.55

12.197 p<0.0001

Liver disease patients

75 3816.53 1415.51 163.45

Total bilirubin mgdl_

Non liver disease

75 0.79 0.47 0.05

-6.406 p<0.0001

Liver disease patients

75 7.84 9.51 1.10

Direct bilirubin mg/dl

Non liver disease

75 0.39 0.29 0.03

-6.644 p<0.0001

Liver disease patients

75 4.58 5.45 0.63

Indirect bilirubin mg/dl

Non liver disease

75 0.41 0.27 0.03

-5.359 p<0.0001

Liver disease patients

75 3.18 4.48 0.52

SGPT IU/L

Non liver disease

75 35.40 30.93 3.57

-3.545 p<0.0001

Liver disease patients

75 181.03 354.44 40.93

SGOT IU/L

Non liver disease

75 32.40 19.26 2.22 -4.862 p<0.0001

92%

8%

(62)

62

Liver disease patients

75 189.39 278.99 32.21

ALP IU/L

Non liver disease

75 94.96 43.17 4.98

-5.291 p<0.0001

Liver disease patients

75 170.19 115.33 13.32

TOTAL PROTEIN g/dl

Non liver disease

75 6.87 0.66 0.08

6.918 p<0.0001

Liver disease patients

75 6.15 0.61 0.07

Serum albumin g/dl

Non liver disease

75 3.78 0.49 0.06

9.575 p<0.0001

Liver disease patients

75 2.99 0.52 0.06

(63)
(64)

63 CHOLINESTERASE U/L NO.OF LIVER DISEASE PATIENTS

NO. OF NON LIVER DISEASE PATIENTS TOTAL < 4500 >4500 50 25 2 73 52 98

TOTAL 75 75 50

Above table shows that cholinesterase level decrease in 66.7% patient of Liver disease patients, and only 2.7% of non liver disease patients

SENSITIVITY TO DIAGNOSE LIVER DISEASE – 88.9%

SPECIFICITY TO DIAGNOSE LIVER DISEASE – 97.33%

3492.64 4488.5 4595.4 4153.8 6494.21 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000

Sr cholinesterase

(65)

64 Table 8: TOTAL BILIRUBIN mg/dl NO.OF LIVER DISEASE PATIENTS NO.OF NON LIVER DISEASE PATIENTS TOTAL >1.1 <1.1 70 5 20 55 90 60

TOTAL 75 75 150

Above table shows that Total bilirubin raised in 93.3% of liver disease patients, and in 26.7% of non liver disease patients.

SENSITIVITY TO DIAGNOSE LIVER PATIENTS – 93.33%

SPECIFICITY TO DIAGNOSE LIVER PATIETNS – 73.33%

9.1 4.95 7.22 2.3 0.79 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 CASES(CHRONIC LIVER DISEASE) CASES(INFECTIVE HEPATITIS) CASES(OBSTRUCTIVE JAUNDICE) CASES(LIVER METASTASIS)

NON LIVER DISEASE

Total bilirubin mg/dl

[image:65.595.77.547.70.366.2]
(66)
[image:66.595.111.545.111.371.2]

65 Table 9 DIRECT BILIRUBIN mg/dl NO.OF LIVER DISEASE PATIENTS

NO.OF NON LIVER DISEASE PATIENTS TOTAL >0.3 <0.3 73 2 37 38 110 40

TOTAL 75 75 150

Above table shows that Direct Bilirubin raised in 97.3% cases of liver disease, but it is also raised in 49.3% non-liver disease patients.

SENSITIVITY TO DIAGNOSE LIVER DISEASE PATIENTS- 97.3%

SPECIFICITY TO DIAGNOSE LIVER DISEASE PATIENTS – 50.7%

5.11 3.06 5 1.48 0.39 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

(67)
[image:67.595.107.551.96.376.2]

66 Table 10 INDIRECT BILIRUBIN mg/dl NO.OF LIVER DISEASE PATIENTS

NO. OF NON LIVER DISEASE PATIENTS TOTAL >0.8 <0.8 49 26 5 70 54 96

TOTAL 75 75 150

Above table shows the indirect bilirubin is raised in 65.3% of liver disease patient and also 6.7% in non liver disease patients.

SENSITIVITY TO DIAGNOSE LIVER DISEASE – 65.3% SPECIFICITY TO DIAGNOSE LIVER DISEASE – 93.3%

3.88 1.83 2.22 0.84 0.41 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

(68)
[image:68.595.109.519.71.331.2]

67 Table 11

SGPT IU/L NO.OF LIVER DISEASE PATIENTS NO.OF NON LIVER DISEASE PATIENTS TOTAL >40 <40 45 30 13 62 58 92

TOTAL 75 75 150

Above table shows that SGPT is raised in 60% of liver disease and 17.3% of non liver disease patients.

SENSITIVITY TO DIAGNOSE LIVER PATIENTS: 60%

SPECIFICITY TO DIAGNOSE LIVER PATIENTS: 82.7%

65.96

890.6

(69)
[image:69.595.108.538.72.309.2]

68 Table 12

SGOT U/L NO.OF LIVER

DISEASE PATIENTS NO.OF NON LIVER DISEASE PATIENTS TOTAL >38 <38 65 10 21 54 86 64

TOTAL 75 75 150

Above table shows that SGOT is raised in 86.7% of patients with liver disease and 13.3% of patient with non liver disease

SENSITIVITY TO DIAGNOSE LIVER DISEASE: 86.7%

SPECIFICITY TO DIAGNOSE LIVER DISEASE: 72.0%

(70)
[image:70.595.106.564.72.365.2]

69 Table 13

ALP IU/L NO.OF LIVER

DISEASE PATIENTS NO.OF NON LIVER DISEASE PATIENTS TOTAL >130 <130 40 35 11 64 51 99

TOTAL 75 75 150

Above table shows that ALP is raised in 53,33% patient of liver disease and in 14.7% patients of non liver disease patients

SENSITIVITY TO DIAGNOSE LIVER DISEASE – 53.33%

SPECIFICITY TO DIAGNOSE LIVER DISEASE – 85.33%

(71)
[image:71.595.106.547.71.342.2]

70 Table 14 TOTAL PROTEIN g/dl NO.OF LIVER DISEASE PATIENTS

NO. OF NON LIVER DISEASE PATIENTS TOTAL <6.5 >6.5 57 18 9 66 66 84

TOTAL 75 75 150

Above table shows that Total protein is decreased in 76% of patients with Liver disease and 13.63% of patients with non liver diseases

SENSITIVITY TO DIAGNOSE LIVER DISEASE – 76%

SPECIFICITY TO DIAGNOSE LIVER DISEASE – 88%

6.11 6.22 6.21 6.24

6.87 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7

(72)
[image:72.595.113.536.70.341.2]

71 Table 15

SERUM ALBUMIN g/dl

NO. OF LIVER DISEASE PATIENTS

NO. OF NON LIVER DISEASE PATIENTS TOTAL <3.5 >3.5 63 12 16 59 79 71

TOTAL 75 75 150

Above table shows that Serum albumin is decreased in 84% of liver disease patients and 21.33% of patients with non liver disease patients

SENSITIVITY TO DIAGNOSE LIVER DISEASE PATIENT- 84%

SPECIFICITY TO DIAGNOSE LIVER DISEASE PATIENT – 78.7%

2.89 3.27 3.18 3.08

3.78 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

(73)

72

Table 16: COMPARISON OF MEANS OF LABORATORY

PARAMETERS IN CHRONIC LIVER DISEASE GROUP: (Patients are grouped according to CTP scoring system)

N Mean

Std. Deviat ion

Std. Error

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Minimu m Maximu m Lower Bound Upper

Bound f value p value

Sr

cholinesterase UL

A 10 5490.

60 628.6 8 198.8 1 5040.8 7 5940.3 3 4823.0

0 6780.00

105.936 0.000

B 16 4111.

56 587.8 2 146.9 5 3798.3 4 4424.7 9 3367.0

0 5797.00

C 24 2247.

54 650.3 6 132.7 5 1972.9 2 2522.1 7 1342.0

0 3394.00

Tot

al 50

3492. 64 1440. 82 203.7 6 3083.1 6 3902.1 2 1342.0

0 6780.00

Total bilirubin mg/dl

A 10 1.74 0.57 0.18 1.34 2.14 .90 2.30

11.068** p<00.001

B 16 3.91 4.10 1.03 1.73 6.10 .60 12.00

C 24 15.62 13.14 2.68 10.07 21.17 1.20 38.80

Tot

al 50 9.10 11.27 1.59 5.89 12.30 .60 38.80

Direct bilirubin mg/dl

A 10 1.15 0.46 0.14 0.82 1.48 .40 1.60

12.304** p<00.001

B 16 1.78 1.92 0.48 0.75 2.80 .10 7.00

C 24 8.98 7.42 1.51 5.84 12.11 .50 23.70

Tot

al 50 5.11 6.42 0.91 3.28 6.93 .10 23.70

Indirect bilirubin mg/dl

A 10 0.59 0.17 0.05 0.47 0.71 .30 .80

8.222** p<00.001

B 16 1.80 2.17 0.54 0.65 2.95 .20 7.30

C 24 6.64 6.46 1.32 3.91 9.37 .60 19.40

Tot

al 50 3.88 5.33 0.75 2.37 5.40 .20 19.40

SGPT IU/L

A 10 48.80 47.87 15.14 14.55 83.05 17.00 146.00

.473 .626

B 16 67.19 69.79 17.45 30.00 104.37 13.00 250.00

C 24 72.29 66.51 13.58 44.21 100.37 20.00 250.00

Tot

al 50 65.96 63.78 9.02 47.83 84.09 13.00 250.00

SGOT IU/L

A 10 77.00 43.66 13.81 45.77 108.23 27.00 172.00

.746 .480

B 16 116.0

6 66.43 16.61 80.67 151.46 32.00 261.00

C 24 116.1

7

114.7

0 23.41 67.73 164.60 10.00 496.00

Tot

al 50

108.3

0 90.15 12.75 82.68 133.92 10.00 496.00

ALP IU/L

A 10 101.0

0 34.41 10.88 76.39 125.61 62.00 164.00

1.121 0.335

B 16 132.5

0 43.94 10.98 109.09 155.91 79.00 256.00

C 24 119.9

2 62.01 12.66 93.73 146.10 36.00 309.00

Tot

al 50

120.1

6 52.33 7.40 105.29 135.03 36.00 309.00

[image:73.595.87.572.171.765.2]
(74)

73

TOTAL PROTEIN g/dl

B 16 6.21 0.59 0.15 5.90 6.53 5.10 7.30

C 24 5.89 0.75 0.15 5.57 6.21 4.00 7.10

Tot

al 50 6.11 0.68 0.10 5.92 6.31 4.00 7.30

Sr albumin g/dl

A 10 3.62 0.32 0.10 3.39 3.85 3.30 4.30

38.750** p<00.001

B 16 3.09 0.40 0.10 2.87 3.30 2.20 3.70

C 24 2.46 0.36 0.07 2.31 2.61 1.70 3.00

Tot

al 50 2.89 0.58 0.08 2.73 3.06 1.70 4.30

(75)

74

MULTIPLE COMPARISONS

Bonferroni Dependent Variable (I) CTPscore (J) CTPscore Mean Difference (I-J)

Std. Error Sig. 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound Sr cholinesterase U/L

A B 1379.03750

* 252.69237 .000 751.6795 2006.3955

C 3243.05833* 235.93876 .000 2657.2945 3828.8222

B A

-1379.03750* 252.69237 .000

-2006.3955 -751.6795

C 1864.02083* 202.31582 .000 1361.7325 2366.3092

C

A

-3243.05833* 235.93876 .000

-3828.8222 -2657.2945

B

-1864.02083* 202.31582 .000

-2366.3092 -1361.7325

Total bilirubin mg/dl

A B -2.17250 3.82360 1.000 -11.6653 7.3203

C -13.87667* 3.57010 .001 -22.7401 -5.0132

B A 2.17250 3.82360 1.000 -7.3203 11.6653

C -11.70417* 3.06133 .001 -19.3045 -4.1038

C A 13.87667

* 3.57010 .001 5.0132 22.7401

B 11.70417* 3.06133 .001 4.1038 19.3045

Direct bilirubin mg/dl

A B -.62500 2.13966 1.000 -5.9371 4.6871

C -7.82500* 1.99780 .001 -12.7849 -2.8651

B A .62500 2.13966 1.000 -4.6871 5.9371

C -7.20000* 1.71310 .000 -11.4531 -2.9469

C A 7.82500

* 1.99780 .001 2.8651 12.7849

B 7.20000* 1.71310 .000 2.9469 11.4531

Indirect bilirubin mg/dl

A B -1.21000 1.88746 1.000 -5.8960 3.4760

C -6.05167* 1.76232 .004 -10.4270 -1.6764

B A 1.21000 1.88746 1.000 -3.4760 5.8960

C -4.84167* 1.51118 .007 -8.5935 -1.0899

C A 6.05167

* 1.76232 .004 1.6764 10.4270

B 4.84167* 1.51118 .007 1.0899 8.5935

TOTAL PROTEIN g/dl

A B .27750 .26181 .884 -.3725 .9275

C .59833 .24445 .055 -.0086 1.2052

B A -.27750 .26181 .884 -.9275 .3725

C .32083 .20961 .398 -.1996 .8412

C A -.59833 .24445 .055 -1.2052 .0086

B -.32083 .20961 .398 -.8412 .1996

Sr albumin g/dl

A B .53250

* .14723 .002 .1670 .8980

C 1.15750* .13747 .000 .8162 1.4988

B A -.53250

* .14723 .002 -.8980 -.1670

C .62500* .11788 .000 .3323 .9177

C A -1.15750

* .13747 .000 -1.4988 -.8162

B -.62500* .11788 .000 -.9177 -.3323

(76)

75 Interpretation:

The above table depicts the CTP group’s percentage .The group C has maximum (48%) percentage comparing to group A,B .

26%

32%

48%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

A B C

CTP SCORE

(77)

76

CORRELATION BETWEEN SERUM CHOLINESTERASE AND PARAMETERS OF LFT:

CASES(CHRONIC LIVER DISEASE)

Serum cholinesterase U/L

N Minimum Maximum Mean

Standard

Deviation r

Direct bilirubin mg/dl

>0.3 48 1342.00 6780.00 3467.10 1462.94

-.473**

<0.3 2 3687.00 4524.00 4105.50 591.85

Indirect bilirubin

mg/dl

>0.8 29 1342.00 5797.00 2810.90 1064.74

-.396**

<0.8 21 1377.00 6780.00 4434.10

1376.

38

SGPT IU/L

>40 21 1342.00 5797.00 3283.38 1284.48

-.156

<40 29 1377.00 6780.00 3644.17 1548.49

SGOT IU/L

>38 40 1342.00 6780.00 3563.75 1495.61

-.129

<38 10 1450.00 5387.00 3208.20 1223.55

ALP IU/L <130 30 6780.00 1377.00 3501.00 1617.00 0,04

>130 20 5797.00 1342.00 3472.15 1166.23

Serum albumin g/dl

>3.5 5 3510.00 6780.00 5279.80 1232.84

.704**

3.0-3.5 20 1617.00 6124.00 4252.30 1107.62

<3.0 25 1342.00 4588.00 2527.48 947.22

Total bilirubin mg/dl

>1.1 45 1342.00 6124.00 3306.24 1354.62

-.452**

<1.1 5 3687.00 6780.00 5170.20 1156.24

**P<0.001

Serum cholinesterase showed moderate negative correlation with serum bilirubin

Strong positive Correlation with albumin at p value <0.001

Correlation with Total bilirubin, Direct bilirubin, Indirect bilirubin is negative at p value

<0.001

(78)

77

Scatter diagram showing strong Positive correlation between serum cholinesterase and

serum albumin in chronic liver disease group.

Scatter diagram showing moderate negative correlation between serum cholinesterase

(79)

78

CORRELATION OF SERUM CHOLINESTERASE AND PARAMETERS OF

LFT IN INFECTIOUS HEPATITIS GROUP:

Cases ( Infective hepatitis)

Serum cholinesterase UL

N Minimum Maximum Mean

Standard

Deviation

Direct bilirubin mg/dl >0.3 10 3100.00 6454.00 4488.50 1092.14 -.840**

<0.3 0

Indirect bilirubin mg/dl >0.8 9 3100.00 6454.00 4381.33 1101.20 -.920**

<0.8 1 5453.00 5453.00 5453.00

SGPT IU/L >40 10 3100.00 6454.00 4488.50 1092.14 .587

<40 0

SGOT IU/L >38 10 3100.00 6454.00 4488.50 1092.14 .667*

<38 0

ALP IU/L <130 0 0.648

>130 10 6454.00 3100.00 4488.50 1092.14

Serum albumin g/dl >3.5 1 5600.00 5600.00 5600.00 .680*

3.0-3.5 9 3100.00 6454.00 4365.00 1081.79

<3.0 0

Total bilirubin mg/dl >1.1 10 3100.00 6454.00 4488.50 1092.14 -.928**

<1.1 0

**p<0.001 *p<0.05

Serum cholinesterase has moderate to strong positive correlation with serum albumin and SGOT at p value <0.05

Serum cholinesterase has strong negative correlation with Total bilirubin, Direct bilirubin, Indirect bilirubin at p value <0.001

correlation with SGPT and ALP are statistically not significant

(80)

79 Scatter diagram

showing Positive correlation between serum albumin and serum

cholinesterase in Infective hepatitis

group

(81)

80

CORRELATION OF SERUM CHOLINESTRASE WITH PARAMETERS OF LFT IN OBSTRUCTIVE JAUNDICE GROUP:

Cases ( obstructive jaundice)

Serum cholinesterase U/L

N Minimum Maximum Mean

Standard

Deviation

Direct bilirubin

mg/dl

>0.3 10 2879.00 6232.00 4595.40 1241.04

-.820**

<0.3 0

Indirect bilirubin

mg/dl

>0.8 10 2879.00 6232.00 4595.40 1241.04

-.550

<0.8 0

SGPT IU/L

>40 10 2879.00 6232.00 4595.40 1241.04

.194

<40 0

SGOT IU/L

>38 10 2879.00 6232.00 4595.40 1241.04

-.130

<38 0

ALP IU/L <130 0 -0.408

>130 10 6232.00 2879.00 4595.00 1241.04

Serum albumin g/dl

>3.5 0

.963**

3.0-3.5 8 3620.00 6232.00 4983.00 1055.41

<3.0 2 2879.00 3211.00 3045.00 234.76

Total bilirubin mg/dl

>1.1 10 2879.00 6232.00 4595.40 1241.04

-.850**

<1.1 0

**p<0.001

Serum cholinesterase has strong positive correlation with serum albumin at p

value <0.001 Serum cholinesterase has strong negative correlation with Total and

Direct bilirubin at p value <0.001. Correlation with other variables are statistically not

(82)

81

CORRELATION OF SERUM CHOLINESTERASE WITH PARAMETERS OF

LFT IN LIVER METASTASIS:

Cases(Liver metastasis) Serum cholinesterase U/L

N Minimum Maximum Mean

Standard Deviation Directbilirubin

mg/dl

>0.3 5 2324.00 5349.00 4153.80 1178.73 -.762

<0.3 0

Indirect bilirubin mg/dl

>0.8 1 2324.00 2324.00 2324.00 -.869

<0.8 4 3732.00 5349.00 4611.25 676.35

SGPT IU/L >40 4 2324.00 4832.00 3855.00 1121.30 -.708

<40 1 5349.00 5349.00 5349.00

SGOT IU/L >38 5 2324.00 5349.00 4153.80 1178.73 -.861

<38 0

ALP IU/L <130 5 5349.00 2324.00 4153.00 1178.73 -0.31

>130 0

Serum albumin g/dl >3.5 0 .994**

3.0-3.5

3 4532.00 5349.00 4904.33 413.28

<3.0 2 2324.00 3732.00 3028.00 995.61

Total bilirubin mg/dl >1.1 4 2324.00 5349.00 3984.25 1288.75 -.821

<1.1 1 4832.00 4832.00 4832.00

**p value<0.001

Serum cholinesterase has strong positive correlation with serum albumin at p

(83)

82

CORRELATION OF SERUM CHOLINESTERASE WITH SEVERITY OF

CHRONIC LIVER DISEASE ACCORDING TO CHILD TURCOTTE PUGH

SCORING:

+

Serum cholinesterase U/L

Count Minimum Maximum Mean

Standard Deviation

r VALUE

CTP SCORE

A 10 4823.00 6780.00 5490.60 628.68

-0.857** B 16 3367.00 5797.00 4111.56 587.82

C 24 1342.00 3394.00 2247.54 650.36

**p value<0.001

Serum cholinesterase has strong negative correlation with CTP score and it is

statistically significant. (i.e severity of chronic liver disease increase with decrease in

serum cholinesterase.

Mean Serum cholinesterase CTP score

5490.60±628.68 A

4111.56±587.82 B

(84)

83

(85)

84 DISSCUSSION:

Our study was conducted to estimate the level of serum cholinesterase and other liver function test( i.e serum albumin, Total protein, SGPT, SGOT, ALP, Total bilirubin, Indirect bilirubin, Direct bilirubin) to 150 cases ( fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria) admitted during period of August 2017 to January 2018.

The patients were divided into two groups:

a. GROUP I – Liver disease patients b. GROUP II- Non liver disease patients

Analysis was done to study the comparison of serum cholinesterase and other liver function tests between Hepatic and non-hepatic cases.

Analysis was also done to study the correlation between levels of serum cholinesterase and levels of serum albumin, serum bilirubin, and severity of cirrhosis of liver ( CTP scoring system) using pearson’s correlation coefficient

Following Observations were made from our study:

i. AGE DISTRIBUTION:

Out of 150 patient, majority were in the 41-50 years age group (28%)

ii. SEX DISTRIBUTION:

(86)

85

COMPARISON OF MEANS OF LABORATORY PARAMETRS IN BOTH GROUPS:

In the study, the level of serum cholinesterase was significantly lower in liver disease patients comparing non-liver patients. Mean of non - liver patients being 6494.21± 1269.16U/L and mean of liver disease patients being 3816.53± 1414.51 U/L, which is highly significant, p value<0.001. Similarly, Total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, Indirect bilirubin, SGPT and SGOT, ALP was significantly higher in liver disease when comparing to non-liver disease patient.

Cholinesterase levels decrease in 66.7% of liver disease patients and in only 2.7% of non-liver disease patients. Total protein levels were lowered in both groups of patients,76% in liver disease patients while in non-liver disease patients it was 88%.

Serum albumin was not only low in liver disease patients (84%), but also in non-liver disease patients (21.33%). Sensitivity – 84%, specificity – 78.7%, at 3.5g/dl.

In our study, it is clearly showed that assay of cholinesterase level has sensitivity of 89.9% and specificity of 97.33%, at 4500 U/L

SERUM CHOLINESTERASE IN VARIOUS CHILD PUGH SCORE GROUPS

In chronic liver disease group, patient is classified according to CTP scoring system. The result shows that cholinesterase tends to decrease in three grades Mean Serum cholinesterase CTP score 5490.60±628.68 A

(87)

86

2247.54±650.36 C

The result is in agree with findings of Gu and Zhong 39. Their data

demonstrated that cholinesterase in the three grades were :

(Child A – 5978 ± 535 u/l)

(Child B – 3957 ± 454 U/l)

(Child C – 2267 ± 332 u/l)

and also agrees with FANPING MENG,XIAOJUAN YIN48,where their sample size is

866 cirrhotic patients and the results are

(child A- 5368±1657.32 U/L)

(child B-2943.06±1212.84U/L)

(child C-1832.51±710.68 U/L)

The child pugh score employs five clinical measures of liver disease, among which

ascites and hepatic encephalopathy are subjective measures. Compared with the Child

Pugh score, cholinesterase is easier and more objective in evaluating the liver reserve

function of cirrhotic patients.

In our study in cirrhotic patients, cholinesterase was positively correlated with

albumin and negatively correlated with total bilirubin, confirming that those substances

were synthesized in the liver and reduced in liver dysfunction due to reduced synthesis.

r value(pearson coefficient) for correlation between serum choilnesterase and serum

albumin is 0.702, r value(pearson coefficient) for correlation between serum

cholinesterase and CTP scoring system is - 0.857 . This shows that serum cholinesterase

(88)

87

with albumin is positive. Correlation with CTP score system is negative. i.e serum

cholinesterase decreases with increasing severity of chronic liver disease.

In their study Gu and Zhong, demonstrated that three cirrhotic patients (two child B

and one child A score patient) suffered hepatic encephalopathy following portal

azygous disconnection operation, with cholinesterase levels of <2,000 u/l. Thus, author

suggested that cirrhotic patients with cholinesterase of <2,000 u/l may have higher risk

of failure.

Data from study conducted by khan40 pointed that 100% patients with cirrhosis

had lower serum cholinesterase level and he also showed that there was close relationship between the severity of cirrhosis and level of serum cholinesterase .

William burnett found serum cholinesterase is useful both as a liver function test and in diagnosis of jaundice.

Ramachandran et al found median serum ChE in chronic liver disease patients was 1590 IU/L (110-8143) compared to non-liver disease patients 7886IU/L (2022-21673), p<0.001. Serum ChE levels below 3506 had a 98.7% sensitivity and 80.3% specificity in predicting cirrhosis found serum ChE is an excellent biom arker of cirrhosis with good sensitivity and specificity42

The finding of present study correlate well with finding of previous studies of . Ruchi Gokani et al46 (2014), Vihan C et al47 (2014), S Venkata Rao et

(89)

88 INFECTIVE HEPATITIS GROUP:

Serum cholinesterase has moderate to strong positive correlation with serum albumin and SGOT at p value <0.05. Serum cholinesterase has strong negative correlation with Total bilirubin, Direct bilirubin, Indirect bilirubin at p value <0.001. Correlation with SGPT and ALP are statistically not significant. SGPT and SGOT are raised significantly when comparing to other groups (i.e. Chronic

liver disease ,obstructive jaundice and liver metastasis)

OBSTRUCTIVE JAUNDICE:

Serum cholinesterase has strong positive correlation with serum albumin at p

value <0.001Serum cholinesterase has strong negative correlation with Total and Direct

bilirubin at p value <0.001. Correlation with other variables are statistically not

significant. ALP is raised significantly when comparing to other groups (Chronic liver

disease, infective hepatitis and liver metastasis)

LIVER METASTASIS:

(90)

89

(91)

90 CONCLUSION:

From our study, the following results were concluded:

 The most commonly observed etiology for chronic liver diseases is alcohol.

 In our study, serum cholinesterase were decreased in liver disease patients (mean value of chronic liver disease – 3492.64±1440.82 U/L, Infective hepatitis – 4488.5±1092.14 U/L, Obstructive jaundice – 4595.4 ± 1241.04 U/L, Liver metastasis- 4153.8 ± 1178.73 U/L, Non liver disease patients – 6494.21 ± 1269.16 U/L).

 Serum cholinesterase below 4500u/l has good specificity comparing to serum albumin in diagnosing liver disease patients.

 There was significant positive correlation between serum albumin and serum cholinesterase level in all cases of liver disease patients.

 There was significant negative correlation between serum bilirubin and serum cholinesterase level in all liver disease patients except liver metastasis in our study.

 Significant correlation was found between serum cholinesterase and CTP scoring in chronic liver disease patients. Levels were lower among patients in CHILD PUGH class C.

(92)

91

LIMITATIONS

1. It is a single centered study. We need multicentric study involving patients of different geographical areas to have a better analysis.

2. Sample sizes of sub-groups of liver disease patients (CLD(n50), infective hepatitis(n10), obstructive jaundice(n10) and liver metastasis(n5)) were small

3. congenitally cholinesterase deficient community people (e.g. arya vysya chettiar in southern India) were not included in exclusion criteria.

4. Liver biopsy/el

Figure

Table 2 showing distribution of patients of non-liver disease
Table 3 : ETIOLOGY OF CHRONIC LIVER DISEASE
Table 4 : AGE DISTRIBUTION:
SEX DISTRIBUTIONTable 5: :
+7

References

Related documents

Similarly, following his detailed studies of asynaptic homozygotes, MILLER (1963) con- cluded that chromosome segments unpaired at late pachynema were not pre-

CCSHS: Cleveland children’s sleep and health study; CFS: Cleveland family study; CHAT: Childhood Adenotonsillectomy trial; CSV: Comma-separated values; FAIR: Findable,

Interestingly, the constitutively filamenting tup1 mutant was more susceptible to the bacterial supernatant isolated at 12 h (early stationary phase) than the C.. albicans suv3

Further development of the multiple scattering approach for DEA confirms the enhancement effect due to the cluster environment, although the DEA cross sections are very sensitive to

Response Surface Methodology shows that optimal values for the lowest surface roughness are 165.5 m/min, 0.1mm/rev, 0.85 mm for cutting speed, feed rate and depth of cut

Multi-Scale Flow Mapping And Spatiotemporal Analysis Of Origin-Destination Mobility Data..

Even before the 2011 Tohoku earth- quake, two earthquakes along the Japan Trench (the A.D. 869 Jogan earthquake and the 1454 Kyotoku earthquake) that generated giant tsunamis

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (using individual or cluster randomization), quasi-randomized controlled tri- als, and non-randomized studies evaluating MMA for the prevention