0022-538X/78/0027-0791$02.00/0
CopyrightO1978 AmericanSocietyforMicrobiology Printed in U.S.A.
Gene
Expression
and
Stability
of-mRNA
Affected
by
DNA-Arrested
Synthesis
in
Gene 59, 46,
and 47 Mutants
of
Bacteriophage
T4
JEN-LEIHWUtANDYUN-CHI YEH*
DepartmentofBiochemistry, Universityof ArkansasforMedicalSciences,LittleRock,Arkansas 72201
Received for publication 13 March 1978
Theeffect ofbacteriophage T4gene 59mutations(DNA-arrested synthesis)on kinetics of DNA synthesis, gene expression, and stability of mRNA has been studied. WhenEscherichia coli B was infected by a T4 gene 59 mutant, DNA synthesisproceededtoincreaselinearlyafterinitiation,butstartedtodecreaseat 8 min and was completely arrested at 12 min at 370C. At various incubation
temperatures(20to420C),the initialratesand times ofarrestof DNAsynthesis
were different, but the total amount of DNA synthesized was constant. This result supports the hypothesis that function of gene 59 is required for the conversion of 63S DNA moleculesto otherreplicative intermediates (39). The abnormality in protein synthesis caused bygene 59mutation ismanifested by(i) adelayed shutoff in the expression ofearly proteins(gene 43, 46,39, 52, 63, 42-45, andsomeunidentified proteins), (ii) areducedrateoflategeneexpression (gene
34, 37, 18, 20, 23, wac, 24, 22, 38, and 19), and (iii) an absence ofcleavage of
certainlate proteins (23,24,IPII and22to23*,24*,IPIII*, and smallfragments).
Itappearsthat therewas noeffectonthe expression ofgene 33, 55, and32bya
mutation in gene 59. Results obtained from an addition of rifampin at the
prereplicativecycle after infection indicated that mRNA fromgenes 43,rIIA,46,
39, 52, and63are more stable in T4amC5 (gene 59) than in wild-type-infected
cells. mRNA remainedfunctional longerin mutant-infected cells, and thismay explain theprolonged synthesis of certain early proteins. Thegeneexpression of other DNA arrested mutants-those in genes 46and 47-showeda pattern of abnormal protein synthesis similartothat found ingene 59mutant-infectedcells,
except morelate proteinsaresynthesized. Thegeneexpression intermsofphage
DNAstructureisdiscussed.
The temporal sequenceofbacteriophage T4 gene expressionduring thedevelopment of the T4 phage in its host appears to be precisely
regulated(9,11, 21,32).Forexample, expression ofprereplicative cistrons,suchasimmediate and
delayed earlygenes, is controlled bytwo inter-related mechanisms. The early genes are ex-pressed immediatelyafter infectionasthe host RNApolymeraserecognizes theirpromoterloci,
whereas the delayed early genes are expressed after the read-through of the immediate early gene termination sites, which is caused by the
appearance of a T4-specific antiterminator
and/orthe newinitiationofquasi-latepromoters (6, 11,20).
Wehave studied the role ofgene59in DNA synthesis and repair. We have shown thatthe
mutation ofgene 59 causes arrested DNA
syn-thesis, premature release of replicative DNA t Presentaddress:InstituteofZoology, AcademiaSinica,
Taipei, Taiwan.
from the replicative complex, little or no
con-catemerformation,slow repair ofprogenyDNA
fragments, and defective repair of UV and al-kylating agent-damaged DNA (35, 36, 39-41). Genes 46 and 47 also belong to the DNA-ar-rested synthesis (DA) gene class (9, 27). The effect that abnormal DNA synthesis, resulting from mutations ofgenesin the DA gene class, hasonthegeneexpression of bothearlyand late proteins hasnotbeeninvestigated.Thestudy of
gene 59is, inpart,important because it has been
mappedbetweengenes 32and 33, theformer of
which codes for DNA-bindingprotein and the
latter of which controls late gene expression.
Whetheror notthe gene 59mutationaffectsthe
expression ofthese genesisnotknown and re-quiresfurtherstudy.
Inthispaper, we present data onthe kinetics
of DNAsynthesisatvarioustemperatures, the
abnormal regulation of early and late gene
expression, cleavageoflate proteins,and
stabil-791
on November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
ityof mRNA in gene 59 mutant-infected cells. Protein synthesis in gene 59 mutant-infected cells has also been compared with that of gene
46and 47 mutant-infected cells.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacteria. Escherichia coli K strain CR63 (30),
which carriesansuI gene, wasusedasapermissive host forpreparingstocks of T4 ambermutants.E. coli
Bstrain 021carryingansu- genewasobtained from
I. Tessmanand used in14C-labeledamino acid labeling of T4 proteins for sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)
slab-gelelectrophoresis.
E. coli B strain Tr201, a low-thymine-requiring strain obtained from G. R.Greenberg,wasusedasa
nonpermissive hostfor T4 amber mutants in
[3H]-thymine incorporation experiments (B. Dale, Ph.D.
thesis,UniversityofMichigan,AnnArbor, 1968).
Bacteriophage. Bacteriophage T4D wasused as wild-type phage in all of the experiments. amC5, an ambermutant in gene 59, wasobtained from R. S.
Edgar.Itwaspurifiedbyback-crossingfive times with
wild-typeT4D. dar mutantswereisolated from our
laboratory (36).All other T4mutantsused herewere
obtainedthroughG. R.Greenberg.
Media.M9medium(16)wasmodified and used for
growingE.coli B021 in"4C-labeledamino acid
label-ingexperiments. One liter of M9 medium contained:
7gofNa2HPO4-2H2O,3gofKH2PO4 (anhydride),0.5
gofNaCl,1gofNH4Cl,24.7mg ofMgSO4,14.7mg of
CaCl2,and4gofglucose.
Chemicals.A"4C-labeled amino acid mixturewas
purchased from New England Nuclear Corp. (25
mCi/matom). Acrylamide, N,N'-bismethylene
acryl-amide, and No-Screen medical X-ray film (Kodak)
werepurchasedfrom Eastman Chemical Co.SDSwas
obtained from BDH Chemicals Ltd. Other chemicals werestandard reagentgradeproducts.
Measurement ofkinetics of DNA synthesis.
The procedure of measuring the kinetics of DNA
synthesishas been describedpreviously (40).
Preparation of'C-labeledT4phage proteins
for SDS slab-gel electrophoresis. The overnight
culture of E. coli B021 wasdiluted50-fold with M9
medium and grownto acelldensityof5 x 108 cells perml withvigorousaerationat37°C,then
D,L-tryp-tophanwasadded to20,tg/ml, and the culturewas
infectedwithpurifiedT4phage particlesata
multi-plicityof infection(MOI)of10.Attheindicatedtime,
inFig.2and3, 1.5-mlportions of infected cellswere
exposedtothe"C-labeledamino acidmixture(0.5uCi
[2 ,ug]/ml, algal protein hydrolysate, New England
Nuclear Corp.)for various timeintervals. Incorpora-tion of 14C-labeled amino acids was terminated by
pouringthe incubation mixture into three volumes of
chilled 5% Casamino Acids(Difco).The infected cells
werecollectedbycentrifugation,washed with50 mM
Tris-hydrochloride (pH 6.8), and then centrifuged
again.The washedcellpelletwasresuspendedin0.5
ml ofsamplebuffer, which contained0.0625M
Tris-hydrochloride (pH6.8),2%SDS, 10%glycerol,5%
2-mercaptoethanol, and 0.01% bromophenol blue.The
phage proteins were completely dissociated and
de-naturedbyimmersingthe14C-labeledsampleinboiling
waterfor 1.5 min. The samples were loaded on the slab gel for immediate electrophoresis or stored at -20°C. Typically, 30,000 cpm in less than 15
pl
of each sample were loaded.SDSslab-gel electrophoresisand
autoradiog-raphy. The"C-labeledproteinsampleswererun on
theverticalslab-gelsystemdescribedbyStudier (29)
byusingthe SDSgeland buffer system ofLaemmli
(18) with slight modifications.No-Screen medical X-rayfilm was exposed to the dried slab-gel by direct contactfor various periods of time(normally4 days). The identification of T4 gene products on the autora-diogram wasaccomplishedby comparison with other published data (21, 31, 38). Therefore, most of the band identificationsaretentative oronlyprobable.
RESULTS
Kinetics of DNA synthesis at different
temperatures. The synthesis of new viral
DNA, which is controlled by the phageitself, is initiatedapproximately5minafterinfection and
continues through the rest of the replicative
cycle (9). The arrest of DNA synthesis in cells
infected with amber mutants of gene 59 begins
at8min after infection at 370C and ends at 12
min(39,41).
Phage DNAsynthesiswasmeasured at
tem-peratures between20 and420Cby adding
[3H]-thymine at3min after infection. Radioactivity
in acid-insoluble material obtained at various temperatures was counted (Fig. 1). The time of phage DNA initiation and rate of phage DNA
synthesiswere studied as a function of
temper-ature;highertemperature resulted inearlier
ini-tiation and higherrateofDNA synthesis. The
initiation of phage DNA synthesis occurred 3
min afterinfectionat420C,6minat300C,and
15min at200C. After initiation,DNAsynthesis
proceededatdifferentrates at different
temper-atures. In T4amC5-infected cells, the time of
arrest of DNA synthesis, as well as the total
amountof DNA synthesis,varies with the
tem-perature, but the total amount of
[3H]thymine
incorporation(about104cpmper 5 x107infected
cells or 0.5
jig
ofDNA per 5 x107infected cells)remainsconstantinspite oftemperature
varia-tion. The phage DNA synthesized, as
deter-minedbydiphenylamine,wasequivalentto10-8
,ugofphageDNAsynthesizedperinfectedcells.
Thisamount is equivalent to approxiinately50
phage equivalents ofDNA synthesized for one phage-infected bacterium, when the molecular weightof the T4 DNA molecule is taken to be 123x 106daltons (17). These results show that DNA replication of T4 gene 59 mutants has normalinitiation of DNAsynthesis, proceeds to somedefinitestage, andthenceases.
Effect of gene 59 mutation on T4 gene expression. Theeffect ofgene 59mutation on the expressionofphageT4 proteinswas moni-J. VIROL.
on November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
PROTEIN SYNTHESIS IN T4 DA MUTANTS
7
6-5
4
3
II..
II II
I, II I, I,
,i
i
11 /
1I /
II f
II
II,
I /
II/
~/
/
1 1 / I I
II
AA
jI
Id
LI0
_2 V6-w 7V
_RMI .2= -a
*_
_ . . . .
20 40 60 80 100
TIME AFTER INFECTION (MIN)
FIG. 1. KineticsofDNAsynthesis in T4D- and T4amC5 (gene 59)-infected cellsatvarioustemperatures.A cultureof E. coli B Tr201,ataconcentrationof5x108cellsperml,wasinfected with T4DorT4amC5(MOI of 5) withaerationatdifferenttemperatures. /3H]thymine (20 uCi [3
lig]/ml)
wasaddedat3min (42, 37, 30, and25QC)
or6min(20°C) after infection.Samples of0.1mlwerewithdrawnatvariousintervalstomeasure radioactivity in the acid-insoluble fractionasdescribedin thetext. Symbols: T4D: O---5 420C;0---0, 37°C; 0---0, 300°C; A---A, 250°C; V---V,20°C; T4amC5: 42°C; @-O, 37°C; 0-O, 30°C;A- A,25°C;V-V,200C.
tored by autoradiography of SDS
polyacryl-amide slab gels after electrophoresis of
'4C-la-beled amino acid-labeled viral proteins. This
procedure provides more specific information
than that of RNA-DNA hybridization, which
can only distinguish a few classes of mRNA
expressed.Either T4DorT4amC5-infectedcells
werepulse labeled with "4C-labeledaminoacids
atthetimeindicated at370C, andthe
incorpo-rationratesweredetermined. Therateof
incor-poration of '4C-labeled amino acids gradually
increased afterinfection, reaching themaximum
rate at 10 to 12 min postinfection, and then
decreased(Table 1). The incorporationratesin
both T4D- andT4amC5-infected cellswere
al-most identicalup to30 minpostinfection. The
14C-labeled
amino acid-labeledproteinsfromin-fectedcells werethensubjectedtoSDSslab-gel
electrophoresis after complete lysis in 2% SDS.
Identicalamounts of "C-labeledproteins were
layered onto each gel slot for electrophoresis.
The differences inintensity of each protein on
autoradiogramsshould reflect the differencein
relativerateor amountofprotein synthesized.
0
/
C,)
-J J w
0
x
IL)
1-lo
O
X
a-w z
I
x LL. 0
z
0
0
a-0 z
A
A,
K
/Z
VOL. 27, 793
2~
on November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
[image:3.501.99.399.69.476.2]794 WU AND YEH
TABLE 1. Rateof"C-labeledamino acid incorporation in T4D- orT4amC5-infected E. coli
B021cellsa
"C-labeledaminoacid incorporation Labelingtime(min (cpm/7.5 x107cells)
postinfection)
T4D T4amC5
2-4 34,800 36,500
4-6 35,800 40,000
6-8 40,900 40,500
8-10 41,300 40,600
10-12 41,700 41,600
12-14 44,500 41,200
14-16 40,600 39,000
17-20 38,700 38,800
22-25 28,700 27,700
27-30 24,000 21,350
aE. coli
B021
cultures (5x108 cells
perml) were grownin M9medium and infectedat37°C with phageatanMOI of10.At the time indicated, the T4-infected cellswereexposed to a'4C-labeledamino acid mixture
(0.5jLCi [2
Itg]/ml).
Under this condition theincorpo-ration of'4C-labeledaminoacids remainedlinear for atleast4min.The infectedcells were washed free of
'4C-labeledamino acidsby centrifugation and lysed in
0.1ml of sample buffer by heating at 100°C for2min. A10-gldportion ofeach lysate was placed onto round Whatman ffiterpaper(no. 3, 2.5-cm diameter) to de-termine the radioactivity in trichloroacetic acid-insol-uble fraction. The same sampleswere subjected to
SDS slab-gel electrophoresis (Fig. 2). Note that the last threepulsesarefor3min, whereas the rest are for
2min.
The effect of the gene 59 mutation on gene expression of early and late proteins and the conversion ofgeneproducts has been examined and isshown inFig.2.The expressionofmostof the immediateearly and delayed early proteins, whicharesynthesized before theonsetof DNA synthesis, ceased at 10to 12 minpostinfection
at
370C
in wild-type T4D-infected cells.How-ever, in T4amC5-infected cells, the shutoff of
earlyprotein synthesiswasdelayed, and synthe-sisofsomeof theseproteinswasprolongedeven until30minpostinfection.These early proteins includedgenes43, 46,39, 52,63,42-45,andsome other unidentified phage proteins. However, otherearly proteins were not affected, suchas rIIA, 32-44,rIIB, and IPIII. In wild type, the late proteinswereexpressedat 8min postinfec-tionunderourconditions, asjudgedby autora-diogram (Fig. 2). All of the late proteins were
synthesized in T4amC5-infected cells, but the rateofsynthesis ofsomelateproteinswaslower (e.g., geneproteins 34, 37, 18, 20, 23*, wac, 24,
22, 38,and 19)whencompared with that of
wild-type-infectedcells.Therateofsynthesis of other lateproteins in T4amC5-infected cells was ap-parently thesame asthat ofwild-type-infected
cells; e.g., gene proteins 7, 10, 8, and 35. Four head-associatedphageproteins,suchasthoseof
genes22, 23,24,andIPIII,arecleavedtosmaller
polypeptides, namely, 23*,24*, andIPIII*, dur-ing morphogenesis (18). Gene 22 product is
*0 0 0* o * o * 0 0 0 0 0 0
--__- - _-_,34 -7
43 - _ -
-riA ____ - _ _ _ 10
46 o3
39 -~~;5;*_=:z=23
F- o2
t; 52 __ _52
D 63
0 32-44 *w-83
42j_s__P_;*;_*
-4 38~# wj
PITu
2IM
4m
-p-a-CmsmmaOnam asmsdui'wsa 'i e, 19
2 4 .4 6 68 8 10 10 12 12 14 114- 16 117 20j22 25 27-30
TIME AFTER INFECTION (MIN)
FIG. 2. Autoradiogram ofSDS slab-gel after electrophoresis ofproteinpulse labeled with "C-labeled
aminoacidsatthetimeindicatedafter infectionofE. coli B021 byT4DorT4amC5. See text for detailed
information.Geneproductsof earlyand lategenesareindicatedonboth sidesontheplate. Symbols:@, T4D;
0,T4amC5.
on November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
[image:4.501.44.254.84.251.2] [image:4.501.68.461.408.635.2]PROTEIN
cleavedtoformanunidentifiedproduct(13,18). The conversion of 23 to 23* is very inefficient and that of IPIII to IPIII* did not occur in T4amC5-infectedcells (Fig. 2).The conversion
of24to24*was notresolved under these
exper-imental conditions. The available evidence
sug-geststhatthe proteolytic cleavagesof
head-as-sociatedphage proteinsareintimatelylinkedto the headassemblyprocess(19).Thecleavageof theproducts ofgenes23,24,IPHI,and22to23*, 24*, IPIII*, and small fragments is blocked by mutation inanyof theheadgenes20,21,22,23, 24,and31.Onorato and Showe havegiven evi-dence that proteolytic activity resides in the
gene 21 protein (22). However, T4-specific
pro-teolytic activities arefound at8 to 10min and are maximal at 18 min after infection (2, 23). The expressions of the proteolytic enzyme(s)
maybe reducedby thegene 59 mutation, and, in consequence, the proteolytic cleavage of a number of proteins isreduced bygene 59 mu-tation. Another possible reasonfor the lack of head protein cleavage may be the abnornal DNA synthesis in this mutant, since complete
headassembly normallydependsonDNA
pack-aging events (19). Since theearlygenes 33and 55controlthe expression of lategenes(3, 24, 28)
and since muchlate proteinismadebyagene 59ambermutant(Fig. 2),it appearsthat expres-sion ofgenes 33and55isnot
seriously
affected (ifatall) byamutation ingene 59.StabilityofearlymRNA's ingene 59 mu-tant-infected celis. Some immediate early
genes(genes39and52)anddelayedearlygenes
(genes 43, 46, and 42-45) in amC5 (gene
59)-infected cells showedprolonged expression(Fig.
2). Possible reasonsfor this
delay
in shutoff ofearlygenes are anincreasedrateof
early
mRNAsynthesis,anincreased
stability
ofearly
mRNA (or slowerrateof mRNAdegradation),
orboth. Thesealternativescanbedistinguishedby
treat-mentoftheinfected cells withrifampin.
Rifam-pin bindsto thefl-subunit
of theE. coli RNApolymeraseandtherebyinhibits the initiation of
transcription(12).Ifthegene 59mutation affects
early RNA synthesis, the gene expression of mutant-infected cells after rifampin treatment at the early stages ofinfection should be the
same asthewild-type-infectedcells because the
effect of gene 59 function of gene expression
occurs after 10 min ofinfection. On the other
hand, if theearly messenger of mutant-infected cells remainsfunctionallongerthan that of wild-type-infectedcells,theearlygene shutoff in
mu-tant-infected cellswill beprolonged evenafter
rifampintreatment.
E. coli B021 cells were infected byT4D or
T4amC5 at37°C (MOI, 10), and rifampin was
addedtoafinalconcentrationof400,ug/mlat 4
mm afterinfectiontoinhibit earlymRNA
syn-thesis.Thecapacityofrifampin-treated cellsto
synthesize earlyproteinswasmeasured by
pulse-labeling
with '4C-labeled amino acids followedby
SDSslab-gel
electrophoresis(Fig. 3). In therifampin-treated cells, the same amount of mRNAwassynthesizedinT4D- and T4amC5-infectedcells,asindicatedbythe fact that both
T4D and T4amC5 have the same pattern of geneexpressionforthefirst10minafterphage
infection.
However,
someearly proteinssuchas gene proteins 43, rIIA, 46, 39, 52, and 63 weresynthesizedmoreinT4amC5- than in
wild-type-infectedcells. Thisisconsistent with the greater
stabilityofthe mRNA ofthose genes inT4amC5
infection thaninT4D. The messengers of other
earlygenes such as (32-44-rIIB) and IPIII
ap-parentlyhave the same stability in T4D- and
T4amC5-infectedcells,asindicated by the
iden-ticalintensityoftheproteinbandsinthe
auto-radiograms (Fig. 3).Since theeffect of the gene
59 mutation on the expression of some early
genes is due to this effect on the stability of mRNArather than on RNA synthesis, this in-dicates that gene 59 may act on phage gene expression by affecting some nuclease activity related to the degradation of these early
mRNA's. This gene 59-related nucleaseactivity appearstobespecific for gene 43, rIIA, 46, 39,
52, and 63 mRNA's, but not those for
(32-44-rIIB)andIPIII.Thisspecificity of mRNA
deg-radation may beduetodifferent nucleases acting on these two groups of early mRNA's. Other possible reasons for the delay in shutoff are presentedinDiscussion.
Temporal relationship between
expres-sion of gene 59 protein and its effect on
gene expressionin T4phageinfection. Nor-mal initiation of DNA synthesis in T4amC5-infected cells occurs, but the rate of DNA
syn-thesisbeginstodecreaseat 8min andcompletely
arrests at12min(41). Since the gene59
mutant-infected cells showdelayed shutoff of early genes andexpressionoflategenes,thequestioncanbe
asked: atwhattime after phage infection does
gene 59begintoexert its effectonphage gene expression?Thisquestion was examined by
add-ingrifampinatvarious times after T4Dinfection
and labeling phage proteins with "C-labeled
amino acid at the latelytic cycle (12 to 18min
afterinfection).Incontrasttotheabove
experi-ment(Fig. 3),wefocusedonlate gene expression. When rifampin was added up to 6 min after wild-type T4Dinfectiontoblock further
initia-tionof mRNAsynthesis,theT4D-infectedcells
only synthesized prereplicative gene products butshowednolategeneexpression. Thisresult 795
on November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
796 WU AND YEH
S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 * 0 0 0 * 0
F
43-D)
r31IA _0
o 46
X 39
Z 52-- -- -
-C 63 f _ _
-- ab --
--a__-_
32-44-rIB
--
42-45-PIE-
-b_
.'1'1
'M
qw
vwww
--q qC Sa__n___
_t~..__S a_ .. ....
amm
= -04 - 7
17
--10 110 131
13 16 116 19TIME AFTER INFECTION (MIN)
FIG. 3. Decay ofprotein-synthesizing activity in T4D- and T4amC5-infected cells after rifampintreatment.
E.coli B021 culturewasgrown in M9 mediumto5x 108 cells per mlat37C andinfectedwithphagesatan
MOIof10.At4minafter infection, rifampinwasaddedtoafinalconcentrationof 400,ug/ml.At the indicated
time after infection, "C-labeled amino acids were added to 0.5 ,uCi (2 Lg)/ml of infected cultures. The
conditionsforelectrophoresis and autoradiographyaredescribed in thetext.Symbols:@, T4D;0, T4amC5.
is incontrast toT4amC5-infected cells without rifampintreatment, eventhough thephage pro-teinswerelabeledatthe latestageafter infection (datanotshown). Although early gene expres-sionwasaffected as early as4 min, this result shows thatthegene 59productdidnotexertits effect onlate geneexpression until 6 minafter
infection. However, whenrifampin was added at
8minafter infection,thepattern ofphage pro-teinsynthesiswasthe same asT4amC5-infected cells without rifampin treatment, showing de-layed shutoffofearlyproteins and reduced
syn-thesisof lateproteins.
Ten minutes after T4D infection, more late proteins were gradually synthesized than in T4amC5-infected cells withoutrifampin
treat-ment. The conclusion from this experiment is
that gene 59 starts to exert its effect on gene
expression at 8 min after infection. The time
that gene 59 function starts to act on phage
expression coincides with the arrest of DNA synthesis(41).
Comparison of gene expression ofgene
59 mutantswithother DNAarrestmutants
(genes 46 and 47). The gene expression of T4amC5wascomparedwith other DAmutants:
T4amN13O (gene 46) andT4amA456 (gene 47). Early gene expression was the same as in T4amC5 (gene 59)-, T4aml3O (gene 46)-,
T4amC5-amN13O (gene 59-46)-,
T4aml3O-amA456 (gene 46-47)-, and
T4amC5-amN13O-amA456 (gene59-46-47)-infected cells (datanot
shown). All of these DA mutant-infected cells
showed delayed shutoff of early genes when
compared with wild-type infected cells.
How-ever, some differences were observed in late
protein synthesis between gene 59 mutant and
gene46, 47mutant-infectedcells. Inalatestage
afterphage infection(20 to 22.5 min), somelate
protein products such as 34, 37, and 23* were N ....
19 - 22 |22-25125 28
r..Nomw
.q_V __4wW
J. VIROL.
on November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
[image:6.501.65.458.80.405.2]PROTEIN SYNTHESIS IN T4 DA MUTANTS
synthesized more in T4amN130- and
T4amN130-amA456-infected cells than in
, amN130- and
T4amC5-amN130-amA456-infected cells.
Effect of dar mutation on gene
expres-sion ofgene59 mutant. Wehave isolated dar
mutants (DA restoration) whichare extragenic suppressors of thegene 59mutant (36). These
mutationssuppressthe defect in DNA synthesis
of DAmutantsofgenes46, 47, and 59. In
addi-tion, progenyformationby gene59 mutants is
restored byadar mutation. We examined the
effect ofadar mutationonthegeneexpression
of thegene59mutantby constructingadouble
mutant,T4darl-amC5 (dar-gene 59) (datanot
shown). We found in T4darl-amC5-infected
cellsthat the shutoff of knownearlygenessuch
as43, 46, 39, and 42-45wasdelayedupto18min
afterinfection, but the timeof shutoffwasstill
earlier than that of T4amC5-infectedcells.
Although the temporal expression of late
pro-teins indarl-amC5-infectedcells wassimilarto
that in T4darl-infected cells, most of the late
proteins and the conversion of head proteins (23
to 23*, 24 to 24*, and IPIII to IPIII*) were
reduced. These results indicated thatalthough
T4darl restored the arrested DNA synthesis
andprogenyformation ofgene59 mutation toa
nornal level, the gene expression of
T4darl-amC5wasnotascompleteasthat of theT4darl
control. The burst size of T4darl-amC5 was
increasedto200+ 10,ascomparedto25± 5 in
T4amC5-infectedcells.Wehavealsocompared
gene expression of T4darl with that of T4D
(37).
Expression ofgene32protein (DNA
bind-ing)ingene59mutant-infectedcelis.In
dar-amC5 (dar-gene 59) double mutant-infected
cells,wefoundoverproduction ofgene32protein
(DNA binding) as compared with amC5 (37).
Gene 32proteinis known to be involved in DNA
replication, repair, and recombination (1, 41), and gene 32 is contiguous to gene 59 in the
geneticmap.However,in thepresentstudythe
expressionofgene32proteiningene59
mutant-infected cells wasnormal (datanotshown),
in-dicatinglack ofapolareffect.
DISCUSSION
Atvarious incubationtemperatures,thetotal
DNAsynthesized in thegene59mutant-infected
cells was equivalent to about 50 phage DNA
units per infected bacterium. This constant
amountof DNAsynthesis, occurringatvarious
initial replication rates, indicates that mutant
DNA replication proceeds to some fixed point
and then stops. The arrest time of DNA
repli-cation in thismutantis thesame asthat for the
appearanceof defectivejoiningofprogenyDNA
andprematurerelease ofreplicativeDNA from
cativecomplex (41). Thissuggeststhatgene 59 isinvolved in the conversion of early replicative intermediatesto late ones,which is character-ized by theformnationof concatenated molecules
frommonomers of DNA.
We have also shown in this paper that a mutation ingene 59 has a pleiotropic effect on T4 phage gene expression, causing delayed shutoff of earlygenes,reduced expressionof late
genes,andblockage of head-associated protein
conversion. In addition,someearly mRNA's re-mained functional longer in agene 59 mutant than inwild-type-infectedcells. This result
sug-geststhatsome RNaseactivity involvedin the
degradation ofearly mRNA is affected bygene 59mutation.
Some possible explanations for delayed shut-off ofsome immediate and delayed earlygenes
are asfollows. (i) The early mRNA'sare
contin-uously synthesized in gene 59 mutant-infected cells, and the pattern of phageproteinsynthesis issimplyduetothecompetitionbetween early andlate mRNA's for the translationapparatus. Whenrifampinis addedattheearlystageafter phage infection toblock the initiation of tran-scription, the early protein synthesis inthe mu-tantstill continues longer than in the wild-type (Fig. 3). This modelassumes the same rate of mRNA synthesis, but says that the gene 59
mutantmakes it longer period of time. Another
variation ofthis model says that the gene 59
mutant could make early mRNA faster from
timezero.(ii) Thegene 59product isresponsible
foramodification (suchasmethylation) ofthe
existingearly messengers,renderingthem non-translatable. This functioncannoteasily explain
therequirement for the gene 59function in T4 DNAreplication and DNA repair (30). (iii) By mutation ingene 59,thestabilityofsome early
gene messengersisincreased (Fig. 3). Thus,gene
59 product may contribute an RNase activity which isresponsible forthe degradation of some
early messengers at a certain time after infec-tion. This kindofactivity is consistent with the
pleiotropic effects of this gene mutation. (iv) There is a greater initial rate of synthesis of
early mRNA or delayedshutoff of early tran-scription; ifribosomes are normally saturated
with mRNA, this extra mRNA willhave little
effectonproteinsynthesis until mRNAdecays belowsaturating levels. Thenprotein synthesis
should lastlongerinthe gene 59 mutant case (its
higher level would take longer to decay below saturation), withoutinvokinganychangeinthe
inherent decay rate. (v) Some translational
shutoff ofearly protein synthesismay be
dimin-797 VOL. 27,1978
on November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
ished by the gene 59 mutant state. This could indirectly extend the lives of the affected mRNA by protecting themwith ribosomes, asseems to be the casewith regA translationalcontrol (14,
34).
The control of the shutoff of earlygenes by
gene 59is different from that inmutantsT4SP62
(33, 34)andT4R9(14),whichcanprolong early
gene expression up to 60 min compared to 12
minforthe gene 59 mutant. BothT4SP62 and
R9are mutated in regA gene, which maps
be-tweengenes 43and62intheT4genome(14, 33).
The abnormalities ofearly gene expression of SP62 and R9mutants can be detected only in DNA negative (DO) or maturation defective
(MD)states.MutationsinDOorMD genescan
cause a delayin early geneshutoff ofabout 12
min (14). Thus, it was thought that the first
stage
(Si)
was that controlled by DO or MDgenes, and the secondstage (S2) wasthat
con-trolled by regA (34). The delayed shutoff of early genesin DO orMD mutantsmay be due to lack ofa late protein that isrequired either for the switch of translation from earlyto late
messengers orthedegradation ofearly
messen-gers(4, 34), but itcouldequallybe duedirectly tolackofcompetition from late mRNA,which
isnotmadein DOorMD infections. Although
the late proteins are expressed in the gene 59
mutant, the shutoff ofearly proteinsis still
de-layed for 12min (Fig. 2 and 3). The shutoffof
earlymessengersynthesisisdelayed by addition ofchloramphenicol to block early protein syn-thesis, indicating that some early proteins are involved in the shutoff mechanism (5).Atleast
the gene 59 function, an early gene function,
may also participate in the shutoffmechanism for early proteins either directly or indirectly.
Thismaybeanexceptiontothepostulated
first-stageshutoff mechanism forearlyprotein(s) that
issolely controlled bylateprotein(s) (5). It has been shownbyusing rifampinthat the
delayed shutoff ofearly proteins by the T4R9 mutation has a correlation with increased
sta-bility (14, 33). Theincreased
stability
could be asecondaryresult of continuedselection of those mRNA by ribosomes (14, 15, 34). The T4R9 mutationprolongedtheexpressionofsomeearly proteins, such asrIIA, (32-44-rIB), and42-45,butnot43, 39,53, and IPIII (14). Onthe other
hand,T4amC5-infected cells showedprolonged expressionofearlygenes,suchas43, 46,39, 52,
63, and 42-45, but not rIIA, (32-44-rIB), and
IPIII (Fig.2). Itappears that gene59andregA
express their effects through different
mecha-nisms to act on early gene shutoff: e.g., the
specificities of gene 59 and regA functions are
different withregardtodegradationof theearly
messengers.
In DO or MD mutant-infected cells, no late
genes areexpressed (3,28, 34), whereas the gene
59 mutant can express some late proteins. The
difference inlategeneexpressionbetween gene
59mutants andDOor MD mutants isprobably
due to the fact that gene 59 mutant-infected cells have normal initiation of DNA synthesis for3 min (35) and the assumption that it has normal phage modificationof host RNA
polym-erase. The progeny DNA molecules that are
synthesized before arrest canbe transcribed for some lategene expression. However, thissmall
amount of lateprotein synthesisby the gene 59
mutant canbe eliminatedby the introduction of
aDOorMDmutation (datanotshown). These results indicate that replicating DNA can be used for lategeneexpressionandparentalDNA isrequired forearlygene expression. T4 parental DNA canbe used as a template for late gene expression whenatriplemutant,whichis defec-tive in DNApolymerase (gene43), DNAligase
(gene30), and exonuclease (gene 46) is used to
infectanonpermissivehost (8, 38). This require-ment ofa multiple mutationfor replication-in-dependent expression of lategenes tends to
sup-port the concept that normally onlythe newly
replicated phage DNA, which is different from parental, iscompetent forlate geneexpression
(7, 25). The competent DNA contains gaps or
breaks, whichare essential forthe initiationof lategeneexpression. Soon after completearrest ofDNAsynthesis ingene 59, 46,and47 mutant-infected cells, the expression of late genes is affected (datanotshown). This effect indicates
thatgene 59, 46,and47functionsmaybe directly
orindirectly involved in the creation ofnicks or
gaps necessary for late gene expression, since
some progenyDNAissynthesized before DNA
arrest, andmodification of host RNA
polymer-aseis assumedtobe normal. Furtherstudies on abnormalities in the regulation of protein syn-thesis and the structure ofDNA molecules in gene59-infected cellsmayprovide better
under-standing of itsbiochemical function.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Thisinvestigationwassupported byPublicHealth Service research grant GM18012 from the National Institute of Gen-eralMedical Sciences.
LITERATURE CIMD
1. Alberts, B. M., and L. Frey. 1970. T4 bacteriophage
gene 32: a structural protein in the replication and recombination of DNA. Nature (London) 227: 1313-1318.
2. Bachrach, V., and L. Benchetrit. 1974. Studies on phageinternalproteins. II. Cleavageof aprecursorof internalproteins during the morphogenesisof bacterio-phageT4.Virology59:51-58.
3. Bolle, A., R.H.Epstein,W.Salser, andE. P. Geidus-chek.1968.Transcriptionduring bacteriophage T4 de-velopment: requirementsforlatemessenger synthesis. J.Mol.Biol. 33:339-362.
on November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
PROTEIN SYNTHESIS IN T4 DA MUTANTS
4. Bolund, C.1973.Influence ofgene55onthe regulationof
synthesis ofsomeearlyenzymesin bacteriophage
T4-infected Escherichia coli. J. Virol.12:49-57. 5. Bolund, C., and 0. Skold. 1973. Regulation of early
mRNAsynthesisin bacteriophage T4-infected bacteria:
dependenceon bacteriophage-specific protein
synthe-sis. J. Virol.12:39-48.
6. Brody, E.,R.Sederoff,A.Bolle,and R. H. Epstein.
1970. Early transcription in T4-infected cells. Cold
Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.35:203-211. 7. Bruner, R., and R. E. Cape.1970.Theexpression oftwo
classes of lategenesof bacteriophageT4. J. Mol. Biol.
53:69-89.
8. Cascino, A., E. P. Geiduschek, R. L. Cafferata, and
R. Haselkorn. 1971. T4 DNA replication and viral
geneexpression. J. Mol. Biol.61:357-367.
9. Cohen,S. S.(ed.).1968.The expressionofaviralgenome,
p.199-216. In Virus inducedenzymes. Columbia Uni-versityPress, New York.
10. Epstein,R.H.,A.Bolle, C. M. Steinberg,E.
Kellen-berger, E. Boy de la Tour, R. Chevalley, R. S.
Edgar,M.Susman, G. H.Denhardt, andA.
Lielau-sis. 1963. Physiological studies of conditional lethal mutants of bacteriophage T4D. Cold Spring Harbor
Symp. Quant. Biol. 28:375-392.
11. Guha, A., W.Szybalski, W. Salser, A. Bolle, E. P.
Geiduschek,andJ.F. Pulitzer. 1971.Controlsand
polarityoftranscription during bacteriophage T4 de-velopment. J. Mol. Biol. 59:329-349.
12. Heil, A., and W. Zillig.1970.Reconstitution of bacterial DNA dependent RNA-polymerase from isolated sub-unitsas atool for the elucidation ofthe role ofthe
subunitsintranscription. Fed. Eur. Biochem.Soc. Lett.
11:165-171.
13. Hosoda, J., andR. Cone. 1970.Analysisof T4
phage-proteins.I.Conversion ofprecursorproteins into lower
molecular weight peptides during normal capsid for-mation. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci.U.S.A. 66:1275-1281.
14. Karam, J. D., and M. G.Bowles. 1974. Mutationto overproductionofbacteriophage T4geneproducts. J.
Virol.13:428-438.
15. Karam, J.,C.MuCulley, and M. Leach.1977.Genetic
control ofmRNAdecay in T4phage-infected
Esche-richiacoli.Virology 76:685-700.
16. Kellenberger, E., and J. Sechaud. 1957.Electron
mi-croscopicalstudies ofphage multiplication. II.
Produc-tion ofphage-relatedstructureduring multiplicationof
phageT2and T4.Virology3:256-274.
17. Kim,J.M.,and N. Davidson. 1974.Electronmicroscope
heteroduplex studyofsequencerelations ofT2, T4 and T6bacteriophageDNAs.Virology57:93-111. 18. Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins
duringtheassemblyofthe headof bacteriophageT4.
Nature(London) 227:680-685.
19. Laemmli, U. K., andM.Favre.1973.Maturationof the head ofbacteriophageT4. I.DNApackagingevents.J. Mol. Biol.80:575-599.
20. Linder,C.H.,and0.Skold. 1977.Evidence fora
diffu-sible T4bacteriophage proteingoverning the initiation
ofdelayed earlyRNAsynthesis.J.Virol.21:7-15.
21. O'Farrell, P. Z.,and L.M. Gold. 1973.Bacteriophage
T4 gene expression. Evidence fortwo classes of
pre-replicativecistrons. J.Biol. Chem.248:5502-5511.
22. Onorato, L.,and M. K.Showe.1975.Gene 21
protein-dependent proteolysisin vitroof purifiedgene22
prod-uctofbacteriophageT4.J. Mol. Biol.92:395-412. 23. Poglazov,B.F.,and M. T.Levshenko.1974.
Bacterio-phage T4D-induced proteinase. J. Mol. Biol. 84: 463-467.
24. Ratner,D. 1974.BacteriophageT4transcriptionalcontrol
gene55codes foraproteinboundtoEscherichiacoli RNApolymerase.J. Mol. Biol. 89:803-807.
25. Riva, S., A. Cascino, and E. P. Geiduschek. 1970. Coupling of late transcription to viral replication in
bacteriophageT4development.J. Mol. Biol. 54:85-102. 26. Riva, S., A. Cascino, and E. P. Geiduschek. 1970. Uncouplingof latetranscriptionfrom DNAreplication in bacteriophage T4 development. J. Mol. Biol. 54: 103-119.
27. Shah, D. B.,andH.Berger. 1971. Replicationofgene
46-47 ambermutants ofbacteriophage T4D. J. Mol. Biol.47:17-34.
28. Stevens,A.1972.New smallpolypeptidesassociated with DNA-dependentRNApolymeraseof Escherichia coli afterinfection withbacteriophageT4.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.U.S.A. 60:603-607.
29. Studier,F. W. 1972.Bacteriophage T7, geneticand bio-chemicalanalysisof thissimple phage givesinformation aboutbasicgeneticprocesses.Science176:367-376. 30. Taylor,A.L.,and C. D. Trotter. 1972.Linkagemapof
Escherichia coli strain K-12. Bacteriol. Rev. 36: 504-524.
31. Vanderslice,R.W.,and C.D.Yegian. 1974. The iden-tificationof latebacteriophageT4proteinsonsodium
dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gels. Virology
60:265-275.
32. Wiberg, J. S., M. L. Dirksen,R. H. Epstein, S. E. Luria, and J. M. Buchanan. 1962. Early enzyme
synthesisand its control in E. coli infected withsome
ambermutantsofbacteriophageT4.Proc.Natl.Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 48:293-302.
33. Wiberg,J.S.,S.L.Mendelsohn,V.Warner,C.
Ald-rich, and T. S. Cardillo. 1977. Geneticmapping of
regA mutants of bacteriophage T4D. J. Virol. 22: 742-749.
34. Wiberg, J. S.,S. Mendelsohn, V. Warner,K.
Her-cules, C.Aldrich,and J. L. Munro. 1973.SP62, a
viablemutantofbacteriophageT4Ddefective in
regu-lation ofphageenzymesynthesis.J.Virol. 12:775-792. 35. Wu, J.-R.,andY.-C. Yeh.1973.Requirementofa func-tionalgene32productofbacteriophageT4 in UVrepair. J. Virol.12:758-765.
36. Wu, J.-R., and Y.-C. Yeh. 1975. New lategene, dar,
involved in DNAreplication ofbacteriophage T4. I.
Isolation, characterization, andgeneticlocation. J. Vi-rol.15:1096-1106.
37. Wu, J.-R.,and Y.-C. Yeh. 1978. New late gene, dar,
involved in thereplicationofbacteriophageT4 DNA. II.Bindingprotein (gene32protein)and further char-acterization. J. Virol. 27:90-102.
38. Wu, R.,E. P.Geiduschek,D.Rabussay,and A. Cas-cino. 1973.Regulationoftranscriptioninbacteriophage
T4-infected E. coli-a brief review andsome recent results,p. 181-204. In C. F. FoxandW. S.Robinson
(ed.),Virusresearch. AcademicPressInc., NewYork. 39. Wu, R.,F. J.Ma,and Y.-C. Yeh. 1972.Suppressionof DNA-arrestedsynthesisin mutantsdefective ingene59 ofbacteriophageT4.Virology47d147-166.
40. Wu, R.,J.-L.Wu,and Y.-C. Yeh. 1975. Role ofgene59 of bacteriophage T4 in repair of UV-irradiated and
alkylatedDNAin vivo. J. Virol. 16:5-16.
41. Wu, R.,and Y.-C. Yeh.1974. DNAarrestedmutantsof
gene59ofbacteriophageT4. II.Replicative intermedi-ates.Virology59:108-122.
VOL. 27,1978 799
on November 10, 2019 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/