• No results found

HR SERVICE REQUEST SYSTEM VERSION 2.0. HR User Trainings

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "HR SERVICE REQUEST SYSTEM VERSION 2.0. HR User Trainings"

Copied!
20
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

HR SERVICE REQUEST

SYSTEM VERSION 2.0

(2)

Agenda

Why is HR SRS 2.0 needed?

Redesign Focus

How will SRS 1.0 and 2.0 differ?

Critical transition dates

(3)

Why is

SRS 2.0 needed?

 Address functionality needs gathered from user feedback

 External (departmental) and internal (HR) user group recommendations.

 Enhance system’s flexibility to respond to changing business processes.  Add business intelligence to the system

 Provide tools to guide department users in completion of their HR requests.

 Provide better service to departments

 User-friendly interface

 Information presented quickly, clearly, easily

 Provide a tool for departments and HR to increase their efficiency and help

(4)

SRS 2.0 Redesign Focus

SRS 2.0 High Level Capabilities

Single Sign on •Access SRS 2.0 through MyAccess

Aging •Count of UCSF business days/working hours only

•Ability to start and stop aging count for business reasons

Comments •Detailed and searchable

•Highlight comment additions with user notifications

Status & Position •View the status of a ticket versus who is working on it

•Increase ability to manage/track tickets with detailed status

Routing •More open routing structure; ability to route upstream and downstream •Ability to return to department for changes rather than cancelling

Workflow/ Request Forms •Improved workflow to reflect business process

•Ability to start and save draft tickets to revisit later or for Service Center consultation

Work List/Dashboard •Improved worklist to assist in ticket management

•Increase ability to manipulate ticket data; dashboards to sort and filter

Permissions/Users •Accessed via MyAccess

•Crossover with HRIS applications

•Greater ability to administer and manage system access and permissions

File Attachments •Ability to upload all required attachments (more than 3) •Lists of required attachments for each request, if any

Reporting •Easily exported standard reports for departments and HR

***Make sure order is consistent with ALL other documents

(5)

Highlights: How SRS 1.0 & 2.0 Differ

SRS 1.0 SRS 2.0 • Inability to focus in on ticket changes and

processing.

• Home screen notifications to highlight ticket changes and status progression.

• Flat and generic forms: not specific to each request type and population.

• Specific forms tailored for request types and population. • Minimal validation against input data • Greater validation against input data preventing incorrect

processing and improve security

• Ongoing aging count • Aging to reflect only business days without holidays • All comments captured within one field

resulting in duplications

• Searchable comments within a database table with knowledge of who and when they were created.

• Unique system log in • Single Sign On: Log in incorporated into MyAccess

• Rigid routing boundary structure • Open routing structure to support sharing of drafts within departments and routing for collaboration within HR.

• Flat work lists presenting all ticket information • Dashboards enabling ticket information to be sorted and filtered • Minimal ability for collaboration on requests

between service centers and departments.

• Ability for departments to create and save draft tickets for consultation with Service Center prior to final submission. • No linked tickets • Ability to link related tickets

***Make sure order is consistent with ALL other documents

(6)

Key Improvements for Departments

 Ability to manage tickets throughout processing cycle

 Easily view changes, progression, and history of tickets.

 Track each step in ticket process so departments have

precise status of requests.

 Quick view of recent status updates and notifications.

 Business intelligence to assist with complete information

in creation of tickets.

 Creation of draft ticket status to enable collaboration

(7)

Departmental Roles

Initiators

 Once a user is approved by department authority as

initiators, initiators are able to create tickets regarding any employee (within and outside of the initiator’s

department).

Approvers

 Approvers can approve tickets only within the depcodes

(8)

Departmental Roles

Reviewers

 Reviewers can be anyone who has access to SRS. It can

be added by the initiator, approver or anyone who can touch the ticket. Reviewers have the same ability as the initiators and approvers before the ticket is approved.

Department Authority

 Typically the MSO of the department. Department

Authority can set access for initiators and approvers. Department Authority also has access to all tickets within his/her department.

(9)

HR Roles have not changed

HR

 Router  Generalist  Director  Manager  Transaction  Specialty Center

(10)
(11)

Additional Status

Three new ticket ‘status’ options have been added to enable the ease of processing.

Status User Functionality

Draft Department Allows initiators and approvers to create tickets, save the information, and either revisit at a later time or ask the Service Center for consultation. The Service Center can look up the ticket by number, review, and provide

feedback prior to final approval and submission. Return for

Changes

HR If a ticket is incorrectly submitted or needs additional information, it can be ‘returned for changes’ to the

department. When a ticket is returned for changes, the aging clock stops until it is re-submitted.

On-Hold HR If all ticket processing steps have been done, and HR is waiting for the effective date to complete final actions, the ticket can be placed on hold. Placing a ticket on-hold will stop the aging count.

(12)

Request Forms

What has changed?

 Request forms have been created to mimic current

request information and business processes.

 The new system infrastructure provides flexibility which

enables quick changes to be made to the request form content.

 We added a confidential section to include LER, DMS,

(13)

Attachments

What’s changed?

 Ability to upload as many attachments as desired

 Text field allows one to describe an uploaded

attachment

 Maximum size of attachment has increased from 5mb

to 8mb

 List of required attachments for each forms and links to

the template if applicable

 System is now very flexible to change, and lists and links can

(14)

Ticket Notifications

Upstream

 Any upstream tickets will send a notification to the

sender and the receiver: cancel, put on hold, back for changes.

Downstream

 Initiators will be notified every step of the way, including comments and attachments

 Approvers will be notified only when completed

 Department authorities will notified when tickets have

(15)

What’s the SYLLI (‘Silly’) feature?

 The SYLLI dashboard is a new feature that shows all

ticket actions that have taken place since you have last logged in.

 Shows all actions on tickets that you belong to or have

association with

This feature is available for both Department and

HR users

SRS 2.0 Ticket Lifecycle

(16)

Admin Panel

What’s changed?

 The admin panel has simplified the way that HR and

Department users manage system permissions.

 Allows both Departments and HR the ability to add, delete,

and modify user abilities permissions.

 Users can view their role and abilities to help determine

what they can and aren’t capable of doing.

 This also enables users to self manage their permissions and

(17)

User Ability Notifications

Department Roles created or modified

 At least one of the following will be notified:  Initiator

 Approver

 Department Authority  Generalist

HR Roles created

(18)

Ticket Management

Work List: tickets that I’m working on or have

worked on

 Tickets that I own vs. Tickets that I have access to

Request List

 Service Centers staff can search for all tickets under their service center

 Specialty Centers can search for all tickets

Dashboard

 Generalist View/Manager View

(19)

Critical Dates

Date Event

April 8-16th SRS 2.0 sandbox available for user review Survey open to capture feedback

April 19th 5:00PM SRS 1.0 closed for transition

(20)

SRS 2.0 DEMO

References

Related documents

The overall purpose of this study was to examine teacher perceptions of their professional training to teach students with autism spectrum disorder and the relationships

You can create a Service Desk interaction to collect information about a service or support request from a user such as a complaint, an incident, a request for change, a service

10.39 Based on above submissions the proposed tariff i.e. b) Consider the operational constraints and other concerns of the HPGCL as submitted under Chapter 5 of

A range of sockets in the Logic Plus style, designed to combat interference to or data losses on sensitive electrical products and systems due to mains borne voltage spikes and

In either case the generalization should not be made that all rehabilitation counselor training programs are in effect training only counseling psychologists. It is better to

1 Winding 14 is not available on these generators, so parallel star connection giving 190V - 208V is not possible.. 3 Winding 17 is not available on these generators, so parallel

Typical parts of such a composed instru- ment[10] system are the user interface such as buttons, sliders, and accelerometers, the mapping structure defining how the controls

As the source reliabilities are unknown a priori, most existing truth discovery methods explore unsupervised approaches to jointly estimate object truths and source reliabilities,