PBIS WORKSHOP #1B
Digging Deeper with Data: Thinking Functionally
Tuesday October 18, 2016
12:30-3:00 PM
Pocahontas AEA
BEHAVIORAL EXPECTATIONS
EXPECTATION
TRAINING SITE
BE RESPECTFUL
Please,
•
Be an active listener and use technology to enhance
learning
•
Acknowledge and consider all contributions
BE RESPONSIBLE
Please,
•
Sign attendance sheet
•
Participate in learning activities
•
Maintain confidentiality
BE READY
Please,
•
Start on time & end on time
•
Complete tasks needed for all tiers of PBIS
OUTCOMES
DA
TA
SY
ST
EM
S
PRACTICES
4 Core
Elements
Social Competence,
Academic Achievement,
and Safety
Supporting
Decision
Making
Supporting
Staff Behavior
Supporting
Student Behavior
Targeted Tier:
Small group, targeted, evidence-based instruction for some
students
Intensive Tier:
Individualized, intensive, evidence-based instruction
for a few students
Universal Tier:
Robust Instruction
in Behavior & Academics
for
All
Students
(IELS & Iowa Core)
Multi-Tiered
System of Supports (MTSS)
~80-90% of S
tudents ~5-15%
~1-5%
Layers are added for those
that need additional supports
IOWA
MTSS MODEL
Tier 1: Universal Tier 2: Check-In/ Check-Out Tier 2: Check-In/ Check-Out With Modified Features Tier 2: Social/Academic Instructional Groups Tier 2: Check & Connect Tier 3: Brief Functional Behavior Assessment -Behavior Intervention Plan Tier 3: Complex Functional Behavior Assessment – Behavior Intervention Plan Tier 3: Wraparound&/OR &/OR &/OR
Two ways that students are placed into the continuum of interventions:
1. Bottom up: students are identified through decision rules as needing additional level supports.
2. Immediate need: students present as needing higher level supports right away and are placed in appropriate intervention based on meeting decision rule criteria
Differences between FBA and FBT
Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA)
•
A process & a product
•
Requires formal assessment and
analysis of comprehensive data
•
Involves multiple team members
•Requires individual trained in
behavior analysis or functional
assessment
•
Typically a lengthy & intensive
assessment & intervention
process
•
Not often used as a preventative
measure, but rather instituted
when more problematic
behaviors arise
Function-Based Thinking (FBT)
• A quick systematic way of thinking that informs the selection of effective function-based supports
• A preliminary step, prior to an extensive FBA
• Only requires the teacher and an individual knowledgeable of behavior management to facilitate learning process for teachers
• Draws from research-based components of FBA
• Designed to be used as an early intervention strategy with mild to moderate behavior problems • Designed to be used prior to
involving the student support team or outside supports
Universal Tier:
Robust Instruction
in Behavior & Academics
for
All
Students
(IELS & Iowa Core)
Multi-Tiered
System of Supports (MTSS)
~80-90% of S
tudents
Using
your
school’s
behavior
data:
Activity 1: Next Steps
1.
Refer to Functions of Behavior chart (slide 4 or copies
on tables)
2.
Brainstorm reasons each of the 5 behaviors might be
happening
3.
Drill down each behavior (demonstration first)
4.
Ask questions A-B-C style for each behavior
a)
A = Antecedents (time of day, activity, others involved)
b)B = Behavior (frequency, duration, intensity)
c)
C = Consequence (actions taken, maintaining, stopping)
5.
Refer to SWIS Motivation Guidelines handout
a)
Discuss questions related to the perceived motivations in your
Targeted Tier:
Small group, targeted, evidence-based instruction for some
students
Universal Tier:
Robust Instruction
in Behavior & Academics
for
All
Students
(IELS & Iowa Core)
Multi-Tiered
System of Supports (MTSS)
~80-90% of S
tudents ~5-15%
Layers are added for those
that need additional supports
Activity 2, Part 1:
Matching Targeted Intervention to Function
1.
In SWIS or Iowa TIER drill down for students
participating in Check-In/Check-Out (CICO)
• Or students who meet your school’s decision-making rule for CICO
2.
Review their various data including:
• Perceived motivation • Problem behavior • Location
3.
What do you notice?
4.
Discuss your findings. Discuss what this means for
Activity 2, Part 2:
Matching Targeted Intervention to Function
1.
In SWIS or Iowa TIER drill down for students participating
in Social-Academic Instructional Groups (SAIG)
• Or students who meet your school’s decision-making rule for SAIG
2.
Review their various data including:
• Perceived motivation • Problem behavior • Location
3.
What do you notice? Discuss your findings.
4.
Think about alignment to the three group types:
Targeted Tier:
Small group, targeted, evidence-based instruction for some
students
Intensive Tier:
Individualized, intensive, evidence-based instruction
for a few students
Universal Tier:
Robust Instruction
in Behavior & Academics
for
All
Students
(IELS & Iowa Core)
Multi-Tiered
System of Supports (MTSS)
~80-90% of S
tudents ~5-15%
~1-5%
Layers are added for those
that need additional supports
Activity 3:
Function-Based Thinking Dialogue Guide
1.
Read the following sections:
Rationale for FBT (pg. 13)
Overview of FBT (pgs. 13-14)
The Three Steps of FBT
1) Gathering Information (pgs. 14-15)
2) Developing a Plan (pg. 15)
3) Measuring the Success of the Plan (pg. 15)