• No results found

PBIS Workshop 1B Data-Function 10-18-16.pptx

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "PBIS Workshop 1B Data-Function 10-18-16.pptx"

Copied!
16
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

PBIS WORKSHOP #1B

Digging Deeper with Data: Thinking Functionally

Tuesday October 18, 2016

12:30-3:00 PM

Pocahontas AEA

(2)

BEHAVIORAL EXPECTATIONS

EXPECTATION

TRAINING SITE

BE RESPECTFUL

Please,

Be an active listener and use technology to enhance

learning

Acknowledge and consider all contributions

BE RESPONSIBLE

Please,

Sign attendance sheet

Participate in learning activities

Maintain confidentiality

BE READY

Please,

Start on time & end on time

Complete tasks needed for all tiers of PBIS

(3)

OUTCOMES

DA

TA

SY

ST

EM

S

PRACTICES

4 Core

Elements

Social Competence,

Academic Achievement,

and Safety

Supporting

Decision

Making

Supporting

Staff Behavior

Supporting

Student Behavior

(4)

Targeted Tier:

Small group, targeted, evidence-based instruction for some

students

Intensive Tier:

Individualized, intensive, evidence-based instruction

for a few students

Universal Tier:

Robust Instruction

in Behavior & Academics

for

All

Students

(IELS & Iowa Core)

Multi-Tiered

System of Supports (MTSS)

~80-90% of S

tudents ~5-15%

~1-5%

Layers are added for those

that need additional supports

(5)

IOWA

MTSS MODEL

Tier 1: Universal Tier 2: Check-In/ Check-Out Tier 2: Check-In/ Check-Out With Modified Features Tier 2: Social/Academic Instructional Groups Tier 2: Check & Connect Tier 3: Brief Functional Behavior Assessment -Behavior Intervention Plan Tier 3: Complex Functional Behavior Assessment – Behavior Intervention Plan Tier 3: Wraparound

&/OR &/OR &/OR

Two ways that students are placed into the continuum of interventions:

1. Bottom up: students are identified through decision rules as needing additional level supports.

2. Immediate need: students present as needing higher level supports right away and are placed in appropriate intervention based on meeting decision rule criteria

(6)
(7)

Differences between FBA and FBT

Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA)

A process & a product

Requires formal assessment and

analysis of comprehensive data

Involves multiple team members

Requires individual trained in

behavior analysis or functional

assessment

Typically a lengthy & intensive

assessment & intervention

process

Not often used as a preventative

measure, but rather instituted

when more problematic

behaviors arise

Function-Based Thinking (FBT)

A quick systematic way of thinking that informs the selection of effective function-based supports

A preliminary step, prior to an extensive FBA

Only requires the teacher and an individual knowledgeable of behavior management to facilitate learning process for teachers

Draws from research-based components of FBA

Designed to be used as an early intervention strategy with mild to moderate behavior problems • Designed to be used prior to

involving the student support team or outside supports

(8)

Universal Tier:

Robust Instruction

in Behavior & Academics

for

All

Students

(IELS & Iowa Core)

Multi-Tiered

System of Supports (MTSS)

~80-90% of S

tudents

(9)

Using

your

school’s

behavior

data:

(10)

Activity 1: Next Steps

1.

Refer to Functions of Behavior chart (slide 4 or copies

on tables)

2.

Brainstorm reasons each of the 5 behaviors might be

happening

3.

Drill down each behavior (demonstration first)

4.

Ask questions A-B-C style for each behavior

a)

A = Antecedents (time of day, activity, others involved)

b)

B = Behavior (frequency, duration, intensity)

c)

C = Consequence (actions taken, maintaining, stopping)

5.

Refer to SWIS Motivation Guidelines handout

a)

Discuss questions related to the perceived motivations in your

(11)

Targeted Tier:

Small group, targeted, evidence-based instruction for some

students

Universal Tier:

Robust Instruction

in Behavior & Academics

for

All

Students

(IELS & Iowa Core)

Multi-Tiered

System of Supports (MTSS)

~80-90% of S

tudents ~5-15%

Layers are added for those

that need additional supports

(12)

Activity 2, Part 1:

Matching Targeted Intervention to Function

1.

In SWIS or Iowa TIER drill down for students

participating in Check-In/Check-Out (CICO)

Or students who meet your school’s decision-making rule for CICO

2.

Review their various data including:

Perceived motivationProblem behaviorLocation

3.

What do you notice?

4.

Discuss your findings. Discuss what this means for

(13)

Activity 2, Part 2:

Matching Targeted Intervention to Function

1.

In SWIS or Iowa TIER drill down for students participating

in Social-Academic Instructional Groups (SAIG)

Or students who meet your school’s decision-making rule for SAIG

2.

Review their various data including:

Perceived motivationProblem behaviorLocation

3.

What do you notice? Discuss your findings.

4.

Think about alignment to the three group types:

(14)

Targeted Tier:

Small group, targeted, evidence-based instruction for some

students

Intensive Tier:

Individualized, intensive, evidence-based instruction

for a few students

Universal Tier:

Robust Instruction

in Behavior & Academics

for

All

Students

(IELS & Iowa Core)

Multi-Tiered

System of Supports (MTSS)

~80-90% of S

tudents ~5-15%

~1-5%

Layers are added for those

that need additional supports

(15)

Activity 3:

Function-Based Thinking Dialogue Guide

1.

Read the following sections:

Rationale for FBT (pg. 13)

Overview of FBT (pgs. 13-14)

The Three Steps of FBT

1) Gathering Information (pgs. 14-15)

2) Developing a Plan (pg. 15)

3) Measuring the Success of the Plan (pg. 15)

Applying FBT in the Classroom Context (pg. 15)

2.

Use Figure 2 (p. 16) & Figure 3 (p. 17) to practice this

(16)

Moving Forward with Purpose

What additional support might be needed to deepen

understanding of function throughout the tiers?

Identify at least 1 action step to help move forward with

References

Related documents

It is, therefore, interesting to study Radio Frequency Identification Technology applications in library and information centres of Northern India in order to identify

Grid computing versus Supercomputer Tier-1 Tier2 Tier-3 Tier-3 Tier-2 Tier-3 Computer Bus Processor 1 Processor 2 Processor 3... So, 2-3 Billion events  2-6 Petabytes of data

Document the patient’s clinical condition including co- morbidities, pressure ulcer risk factors, significant changes and clinical interventions in the health records. If adherence

Pharmaceutical manufacturers sponsor Patient Assistance Programs (PAP) that provide assistance to low-income individuals, but not all are open to Medicare beneficiaries, and the

tier-1 ISP for connectivity to rest of Internet ‰ tier-2 ISP is customer of tier-1 provider Tier-2 ISPs also peer privately with each other, interconnect at NAP..

The management methods promoted today with cultural controls such as ploughing and harrowing are, for now, an effective way of control ECB population but an in- corporation

Product Name: Blade Server Market in India, By Products (x86 Servers, Non x86 Servers), By End User (SME, Enterprises), By Data Center Type (TIER 1, TIER 2, TIER 3, TIER 4), By

621-038 LP/VN (Licensed Practical / Vocational Nurse) Education/License: Graduation from an accredited LPN/LVN Program Experience: Minimum twelve months experience