• No results found

Vol 2, No 8 (2011)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Vol 2, No 8 (2011)"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

International Journal of Mathematical Archive-2(8), 2011,

Page: 1231-1236

Available online through

www.ijma.info

ON FUZZY SOFT SETS

B. Chetia*

Department of Mathematics, Brahmaputra Valley Academy North Lakhimpur-787031, Assam, India

[email protected]

P. K. Das

Department of Mathematics, NERIST, Nirjuli-791109,Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh, India

[email protected]

(Received on: 19-07-11; Accepted on: 03-08-11)

--- ABSTRACT

T

he soft set is one of the recent topics developed for dealing with the uncertainties present in most of our real life situations. The parametrization tool of soft set theory enhance the flexibility of its applications. In this paper, we redefine fuzzy soft sets and some results are established.

Keywords: Soft sets, Fuzzy soft sets, and Product of fuzzy soft sets.

---

1. INTRODUCTION

Molodtsov [1] pointed out that the existing theories, viz., theory of probability, theory of fuzzy sets, theory of intuitionistic fuzzy sets, theory of vague set, theory of interval mathematics, theory of rough sets, can be considered as mathematical tools for dealing with uncertainties but all these theories have their own limitations. The reason for this is most possibly the inadequacy of the parameterization tool of the theories. So he developed a new mathematical theory called “Soft Set” for dealing with uncertainties and soft set is free from the above limitations. The absence of any restrictions on the approximate description in soft set theory makes this theory very convenient and easily applicable in practice. Later other authors Maji et al.[ 2,3 ] have further studied the theory of softs and also introduced the concept of fuzzy soft sets.

Cagman et al.

[1] redefined the operations of Molodtsov’s soft sets to make them more functional for improving several new results. In this paper, we have redefined the operations of Maji et al. [2] fuzzy soft set and studied some results.

2. PRELIMINARIES

Throughout this work, U refers to an initial universe, E is a set of parameters, P (U) is the power set of U and A

E.

Definition: 2.1[1]

A soft set (fA, E) or FA on the universe U is defined by the set of ordered pairs

(fA , E )= FA = {(e, fA (e)): e∈ E, fA (e)

P (U )}, where fA: E P (U ) such that fA (e) =

φ

If e

A.

Here, fA is called an approximate function of the soft set FA .The set fA (e) is called e-approximate value set or e-approximate

set which consists of related objects of the parameter e∈ E . Let S(U) be the set of all soft sets over U.

Example: 2.1

Let U= {c1, c2, c3} be the set of three cars and E = {costly (e1), metallic colour (e2) cheap (e3)} be the set of parameters,

where A= {e1, e2}

E. Then fA(e1)={c1,c2,c3},fA(e2)={c1, c3}},

then we write a crisp soft set (fA, E)= FA ={( e1, {c1,c2,c3}),(e2,{ c1,c3)}over U which describes the “ attractiveness of the

cars” which Mr. S (say) is going to buy.

(2)

B. Chetia* and P. K. Das / ON FUZZY SOFT SETS / IJMA- 2(8), August-2011, Page: 1231-1236

Definition: 2.2[1]

Let FA

S(U). If fA(x) =

φ

for all x

E, then FA is called a empty soft set, denoted by

F

φ.

Definition: 2.3[1]

Let FA

S(U). If fA(x) =U for all x

A, then FA is called A-universal soft set, denoted by

F

A. If A = E, then the

A-universal soft set is called A-universal soft set denoted by

F

E.

Definition: 2.4[1]

Let FA, FB

S(U). Then, FAis a soft subset of FB, denoted by

F

A

F

B

, if ( )

f

A

x

f

B

( ) for all

x

x

E

.

Definition: 2.5[1]

Let FA, FB

S(U). Then, FA and FB, are soft equal, denoted by FA =FB if and only if

f

A

( )

x

=

( )

f x

B for all x

E.

Definition: 2.6[1]

Let FA

S(U). Then the complement FA , denoted by c A

F

, is a soft set defined by the approximate function

( )

( )

C

A

C A

f

x

=

f

x

for all x

E, where c

( )

A

f

x

is the complement of the set

f

A

( )

x

, that is, c

( )

A

f

x

=U\

f

A

( )

x

for all x

E.

Definition: 2.7[1]

Let FA, FB

S(U). Then, union of FA and FB, denoted by FA

FB , is a soft set defined by the approximate function

( )

( )

( )

A B A B

f

x

=

f

x

f x

for all x

E.

Definition: 2.8[1]

Let FA, FB

S(U). Then, intersection of FA and FB, denoted by FA

FB , is a soft set defined by the approximate

function

f

A B

( )

x

=

f

A

( )

x

( )

f x

B for all x

E.

Definition: 2.9[1]

Let FA, FB

S(U). Then, difference of two soft sets FA and FB, denoted by FA \ FB , is a soft set defined by the

approximate function

f

A B\

( )

x

=

f

A

( ) \ ( )

x

f x

B ,for all x

E.

3. FUZZY SOFT SETS

In this section, we redefine what are called fuzzy soft sets and give various results on fuzzy soft set theory as extension of soft set theory redefined by Cagman, N. et al. [1].

Throughout this work, U refers to an initial universe, E is a set of parameters, (U) denotes the set of all fuzzy sets of U and A⊆E .

Definition: 3.1

A fuzzy soft set (fA, E) or FA on the universe U is defined by the set of ordered pairs (fA , E )= FA = {(e, fA (e)) : e∈ E , fA (e)

(U)},

where fA: E (U) such that fA (e) = null fuzzy set of U,if e

A. Example: 3.1

Let U= {c1, c2, c3} be the set of three cars and E ={costly(e1), metallic colour (e2) getup(e3)} be the set of parameters,

where A={e1,e2}

E and

f e

A

( )

1

=

{

c

1

/ .6,

c

2

/ .4,

c

3

/ .3 ,

}

f e

A

( )

2

=

{

c

1

/ .5,

c

2

/ .7,

c

3

/ .8

}

.

Then,

F

A

=

{( ,

e f e

1 A

( )), ( ,

1

e

2

f e

A

( ))}

2 is the fuzzy soft set over U describes the “attractiveness of the cars” which Mr. S (say) is going to buy.

Definition: 3.2

Let

( ). If ( )

, the null fuzzy set of , for all

, then

is called a null fuzzy

soft set, denoted by

A A A

F

F U

f

x

U

x

E

F

F

φ

φ

(3)

B. Chetia* and P. K. Das / ON FUZZY SOFT SETS / IJMA- 2(8), August-2011, Page: 1231-1236

,

Let

,

( ). Then, F and

are fuzzy soft equal, denoted by

if and only if ( )

( )

for all

.

A B A B A B A B

F F

F U

F

F

F

f

x

f

x

x

E

=

=

( ) ( )

( ) and ( )

( )

( )

( ).

( ) ( )

( ) and ( )

( )

( )

( ).

A B B C A C

A B B A A B

i

f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

ii f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

=

=

=

=

Let

( ). Then, complement of

, denoted by

is a fuzzy soft set defined by the

approximate function

( )

( ), for all

.

A

C

c

A A

C A A

F

F U

F

F

f

x

f

x

x

E

=

where

C

( ) is complement of the fuzzy set ( ).

A A

f

x

f

x

Definition: 3.3

Let FA,, FB

F(U). Then, FA is a soft subset of FB , denoted by

F

A

F

B

if

f

A

(

x

)

is a fuzzy subset of

f

B

(

x

)

for all

E

x

.

Proposition: 3.1

If

F F

A

,

B

F U

( ) then

(i)

F

F

B

φ

(ii)

F

A

F

A

(iii)

F

A

F

B

and

F

B

F

C

F

A

F

C

Proof: These results can be proved easily. For all

x

E

( ) ( )

( ), since

( ).

( ) ( )

( ),sin ce ( )

( ).

( ) ( )

( )and ( )

( )

( )

( ).

A A

A A A A

A B B C A C

i f x

f

x

f

x

ii

f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

iii

f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

φ

∅ ⊆

=

Definition: 3.4

Proposition: 3.2

If

F F F

A

,

B

,

C

F U

( ), then

(i)

F

A

=

F

Band

F

B

=

F

C

F

A

=

F

C.

(ii)

F

A

f

B

( )

x

and

F

B

F

A

F

A

F

B

Proof: For all

x

E

.

Definition: 3.5

Definition: 3.6

,

Let , ( ). Then, union of and , denoted by is a fuzzy soft set defined by the

approximate function

A B A B A B

F F ∈F U F F F F

( )

max{

( ) , ( )}, for all

.

A B A B

f

x

=

f

x

f

x

x

E

Proposition: 3.3

(4)

B. Chetia* and P. K. Das / ON FUZZY SOFT SETS / IJMA- 2(8), August-2011, Page: 1231-1236

by the aproximate function

f

A B

( )

x

=

min{

f

A

( ),

x

f

B

( )), for all

x

x

E

.

( )

,

.

( )

( ) (

)

(

).

A A A A A

A B B A

A B C A B C

i F

F

F

F

F

F

ii F

F

F

F

iii

F

F

F

F

F

F

φ

=

=

=

=

Definition: 3.7

Let

F F

A

,

B

F U

( ). Then, intersection of

F and F

A B

, denoted by

F

A

F

B

. is a soft set defined

Proposition: 3.4

,

,

( ).

A B C

If F F F

S U

then

( )

.

( )

.

( )

.

( )

( )

.

( )(

)

(

).

A A A

A

A E A

C

A A

A B B A

A B C A B C

i

F

F

F

ii F

F

F

iii F

F

F

iv F

F

F

v F

F

F

F

vi F

F

F

F

F

F

φ φ φ

=

=

=

=

=

=

Proposition: 3.5

Let

F F

A

,

B

F U

( ). Then

(i) C

B C A C

B

A F F F

F ∪≈ = ∩≈

(ii) C

B C A C

B

A F F F

F ≈ ≈ ∪ = ∩

Proof: For all

x

E

.

( )

( )

( )

( )

max(

( ), ( ))

min((

( )) ,

( )) )

( ).

C C C A B A B C A B C C A B A B

i f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

=

=

=

=

(ii) Similar to (i).

Proposition: 3.6

If

F F F

A

,

B

,

C

F U

( ), then

( )

(F

)

(

)

(

).

( )

(F

)

(

)

(

).

A B C A B A C

A B C A B A C

i F

F

F

F

F UF

ii F

F

F

F

F

F

=

=

Proof: For all

x

E

.

( )

( )

( )

max(

( ),

( ))

=max(

( ), min(

( ),

( )))

=min(max((

( ),

( )), max(

( ),

( )))

=min(

( ),

( ))

A

A B C B C

A B C

A B A C

A B A C

i f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

f

x

=

( ) ( )

(5)

B. Chetia* and P. K. Das / ON FUZZY SOFT SETS / IJMA- 2(8), August-2011, Page: 1231-1236

4. PRODUCT OF FUZZY SOFT SETS

Definition: 4.1

Let FA , FB (U). Then,

- product of two fuzzy soft sets FA and FB, denoted by FA∧FB, is a fuzzy soft set defined

by the approximate function

:

X

,

( , )

min{

( ), ( )}

A B A B A B

f

E E

×

I

f

x y

=

f

x

f y

.

Definition: 4.2

Let FA , FB (U). Then, ∨- product of FA and FB, denoted by FA ∨FB, is a fuzzy soft set defined by the approximate

function

f

A B

:

E E

×

I

X

,

f

A B

( , )

x y

=

max{

f

A

( ), ( )}

x

f y

B ..

Definition: 4.3

Let FA , FB (U). Then,

- product of two fuzzy soft sets, denoted by FA

FB, is a fuzzy soft set defined by the

approximate function

f

A B

:

E E

×

I

X

,

f

A B

( , )

x y

=

min{

f

A

( ),

x

f

Bc

( )}

y

.

Definition: 4.4

Let FA ,FB (U). Then,

- product of two fuzzy soft sets, denoted by FA

FB, is a fuzzy soft set defined by the

approximate function

f

A B

:

E E

I

X

,

f

A B

( , )

x y

max{

f

A

( ),

x

f

Bc

( )}

y

− −

×

=

.

Example: 4.1

Let U={h1,h2,h3,h4,h5} be universal set and E={ e1,e2,e3,e4}be the set of all parameters. Assume that A= {e2, e3, e4} and

B={ e1 , e3, e4} are two subsets of E.

Let FA and FB be two fuzzy soft sets.

where

FA= {(e2,{h1/.7,h2/1,h3/.8,h4/.5,h5/.9}),( e3,{ h1/.6,h2/.8,h3/.7,h4/1,h5/.9}), ( e4,{h1/.4,h2/.9,h3/.4,h4/.8,h5/.6})}

FB= {(e1,{h1/.6,h2/.6,h3/.8,h4/1,h5/.5}),( e3,{ h1/.7,h2/9,h3/.8,h4/1,h5/.9}), ( e4,{h1/.8,h2/.5,h3/.7,h4/.4,h5/.5})},

Then FA∧FBas follows

FA∧FB

={((e2,e1),{h1/.6,h2/.6,h3/.8,h4/.5,h5/.5}),((e2,e3),{h1/.7,h2/.9,h3/.8,h4/.5,h5/.9}),((e2,e4),{h1/.7,h2/.5,h3/.7,h4/.4,h5/.5}),

((e3,e1),{h1/.6,h2/.6,h3/.7,h4/1,h5/.5}),((e3,e3),{h1/.6,h2/.8,h3/.7,h4/1,h5/.9}),((e3,e4),{h1/.6,h2/.5,h3/.7,h4/.4,h5/.5}),((e4,e1),

{h1/.4,h2/.6,h3/.4,h4/.8,h5/.5}),((e4,e3),{h1/.4,h2/.9,h3/.4,h4/.8,h5/.6}),((e4,e4),{h1/.4,h2/.5,h3/.4,h4/.4,h5/.5})}.

Similarly, FA ∨FB, FA

FB and FA

FB can be derived.

Theorem: 4.1

Let FA ,FB∈ (U). Then

( ) (

)

( ) (

)

( ) (

)

( ) (

)

c c c

A B A B

c c c

A B A B

c c c

A B A B

c c c

A B A B

i

F

F

F

F

ii

F

F

F

F

iii

F

F

F

F

iv

F

F

F

F

− −

=

=

=

=

Proof: With the help of approximation functions, these proofs can be done. For all x ,y∈E

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( , )

( , )

= (max( ( ),

( )))

= min(

( ),

( ))

=

( , ).

c

c c

c A B A B

c

A B

c c

A B

c A B

i f

x y

f

x y

f

x

f

y

f

x

f

y

f

x y

∨ ∧

(6)

B. Chetia* and P. K. Das / ON FUZZY SOFT SETS / IJMA- 2(8), August-2011, Page: 1231-1236

5. CONCLUSION

Molodtsov introduced the concept of soft sets, which is one of the recent topics developed for dealing with the uncertainties present in most of our real life situations. The parametrization tool of soft set theory enhance the flexibility of its applications. In this paper, we redefine fuzzy soft sets considering the fact that the parameters(which are words or sentences) are mostly fuzzy hedges or fuzzy parameters and some results are established in continuation to the work of

Cagman

et al.[ 1].

6. REFERENCES:

[1]

Cagman

, N. and

Enginoglu

, S., Soft set theory and uni-int decision making, European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 207, Issue 2, 1 December 2010, Pages 848-855.

[2] Maji., P. K., Biswas,R., and Roy, A.R., Fuzzy Soft Sets., The Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics, 9(3) (2001) 677-692. [3] Maji., P. K., Biswas,R. and Roy, A.R., Soft Set Theory, Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 45(2003) 555-562.

References

Related documents

You work as an IT security auditor hired by a law firm in Boston to test whether you can gain access to sensitive information about the company clients.. You have rummaged through

case 4: startActivity(new Intent(this, HelpActivity.class)); break; } } } Temperature.java package com.domotics; import java.util.ArrayList; import Pachube.Data; import

Set breakpoints on known callbacks - if active, OllyDbg sets trace breakpoint on all known callback functions when hit trace starts, so that calls from Windows

Similar to the parallel terrace, to assess the effect crop residue on sediment yield (erosion) at sub basin level the SWAT model was successful calibrated for stream flow at the

LED array captured at a 1 m transmission distance: (a) shutter speed - 1/20 s, and (b) image intensity profile.. The S9 smartphone provides 30 fps and 60 fps at FHD and UHD

We define the price of anonymity of a convention as the ratio between the maximum social payoff of any (asymmetric) strategy profile and the expected social payoff of the convention.

They will lead the development of Bissell Centre’s financial plans as well as advise the Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Operating Officer (COO) in the financial aspects of

The specific objectives were to investigate the waste management practices, assess the level of awareness, their willingness to participate, concern for waste