International Journal of Mathematical Archive-2(5), May - 2011
, Page: 753-757Available online through
www.ijma.info
ON SYLOW NUMBERS OF THE ALTERNATING SIMPLE GROUPS
1Rulin Shen*
Department of Mathematics, Hubei University for Nationalities, Enshi, Hubei, P.R. China, 445000 E-mail: [email protected]
Ronghua Tan
Department of Mathematics, Hubei University for Nationalities, Enshi, Hubei, P.R. China, 445000
(Received on: 29-04-11; Accepted on: 11-05-11)
---
ABSTRACT
I
n this paper we give the formula of numbers of Sylow subgroups of alternating simple groups. This partially solves aproblem posed by Jiping Zhang.
Keywords: symmetric groups, alternating groups, Sylow numbers.
MR (2000): 20D60, 20D06.
---
1. INTRODUCTION AND LEMMAS:
The structure of normalizer of Sylow 2-subgroup of symmetric groups
S
nis studied by P. Hall (see Lemma 4 of [1], or[2]), he proved that Sylow 2-subgroup is self-normalized. The study in the numbers of Sylow subgroups (also called the Sylow numbers) is due to Professor Jiping Zhang [5]. He proved a conjecture of Huppert's. Then he put forward a problem in the end of his paper [5]. determine the number of Sylow
p
-subgroup of finite simple groups. In this paperwe give the formula of Sylow numbers of the alternating simple group
A
n, which partially solves above Zhang'sproblem. Let
Ω =
{1, 2,3,..., }
n
,S
( )
Ω
orS
n be symmetric group onΩ
andP
n be a Sylowp
-subgroup ofsymmetric group
S
n. Then|
| ( !)
s n( )n p
P
=
n
=
p
, wheres n
( )
n
n
2n
3...
p
p
p
=
+
+
+
.Suppose that r 1 r 1
...
1 0r r
n
=
a p
+
a
−p
−+
+
a p
+
a
is thep
-adic expansion of the numbern
, in which0
≤
a
i≤
p
−
1
,i
=
0,1,...,
r
anda
r≠
0
. In the following paper, the numberp
is always a prime. We will prove:Theorem: The number of Sylow
p
-subgroup of the alternating groupA n
n(
≥
6)
is1 2 2 ... ( )
0 1
!
! !... !
s n(
1)
a a rarr
n
a a
a p
p
−
+ + + .---
Rulin Shen* and Ronghua Tan On sylow numbers of the alternating simple groups Next we will cite some lemmas.
Lemma: 1 Let
X
=
{1, 2,..., }
p
,Y
=
{1, 2,..., , , ,...,
t i i
1 2i
p t−}
andX
∩
Y
=
{1, 2,..., }
t
with1
≤ ≤
t
p
−
1
.Suppose that
a b
,
arep
-cycles onX
andY
, respectively. Then the groupa b
,
is not ap
-group.Proof: Suppose that
a b
,
is ap
-group. Clearly, it is a transitive permutation on the setX
∩
Y
, and its degreen
is
|
X
∩
Y
| 2
=
p
−
t
. Since1
≤ ≤
t
p
−
1
, we have1
<
n
<
2
p
. On the other hand, the degree ofa b
,
is amultiple of
p
since it is ap
-group. In fact, we only need to choose a subgroupP
ofa b
,
whose kernel is 1and order is maximal, then
n
=|
a b
,
:
P
|
. So thatp n
|
, which contradicts the facts thatp
<
n
<
2
p
.Lemma: 2 The normalizer of Sylow
p
-subgroup of the symmetric groupS
p (p
≥
5
) is the Frobeniusgroup
Z
p:
Z
p−1.Proof: Let
Z
p=
(123... )
p
is a Sylowp
-subgroup ofS
p. Choose an elementb
=
(12435687...)
. It iseasy to check that
(123... )
b pp
∈
Z
, and hence:
,
(
)
pp S p
Z
a b
≤
N
Z
. On the other hand,S
p has(
p
−
1)!
elements with order
p
exactly, so the number of subgroups of orderp
inS
p is(
p
−
2)!
. Obviously, the number|
:
(
) |
p
p S p
S
N
Z
of Sylowp
-subgroups is also(
p
−
2)!
$, thus|
(
) |
(
1)
pS p
N
Z
=
p p
−
. Therefore,(
)
pS p
N
Z
isa Frobenius group with order
p p
(
−
1)
.
the wreath product of
A
andB
, in whichB
regarded as a2. Proof of Theorem: Denote by
permutation group. Denote by , .
It is known that the Sylow
p
-subgroup rp
P
of rp
S
is (see 1.6.19 in [4]). Of course, it is a transitivegroup with degree ( )
r
s p
P
. IfG
acts on the set∆
andX
⊆ ∆
, thenN
X stands for the global stabilizer of subsetX
inG
. We will use the following steps to complete the proof of the Theorem.Step: 1 If
n
=
p
r, thenLet
X
=
{1, 2,...,
p
r}
,{ (
1) 1, (
1) 2,..., (
1)
}
i
X
=
p i
−
+
p i
−
+
p i
−
+
p
, where1
i
p
r−1≤ ≤
. SetD
={
X X
1,
2,...,
X
pr−1}
. ThenClearly,
S X
( )
D must include a Sylowp
-subgroupP
pr ofS X
( )
.1
Rulin Shen* and Ronghua Tan On sylow numbers of the alternating simple groups
the set of the fundamental subgroups in
S X
( )
. Set( )
(
r) {
|
( ),
r(
)}.
x x x
S X p p p
Fun
P
K
x
S X
K
P
Syl
K
∆ =
=
∈
∩
∈
By the definition of
∆
, we have{
|1
r 1}
iK
≤ ≤
i
p
−⊆ ∆
. Suppose that there exists an elementg
∈
S X
( )
suchthat
K
g∈ ∆
, andK
g≠
K
i for eachi
. Now we let g:
( (
1))
K
=
S g X
. of courseg X
(
1)
≠
K
i for eachi
. By thedefinition of
∆
, we know that r( ( ))
gp p
K
∩
P
∈
Syl S X
. Then there exists a Sylowp
-subgroupP
ofK
g suchthat
P
≤
P
pr. Without loss of generality, we can assume thata
=
(123... )
p
∈
K
∩
P
n, thena P
,
≤
P
pr. Supposethat
X
i∩
g X
(
1)
≠ ∅
for somei
, and set|
X
i∩
g X
(
1) |
=
t
, where1
≤ ≤
t
p
−
1
. Then we can assumethat
g X
(
1) {1, 2,..., , , ,...,
=
t i i
1 2i
p t−}
. By the Lemma 1, for anyp
-cycleb
ong X
(
1)
, we havea b
,
is not ap
-group. Then suchP
does not exist, contradicts. SoX
i∩
g X
(
1)
= ∅
for anyi
, thatis
(
1)
(
1)
(
pr11)
i i
g X
∩
X
=
g X
∩ ∪
=−X
= ∅
,which contradicts the fact that( )
g
K
≤
S X
.Thus
{
|1
r1}
iK
≤ ≤
i
p
−= ∆
. Moreover, by the definition of∆
, we know that r(
)
x x
p p
K
∩
P
∈
Syl
K
forany
K
x∈ ∆
. If S X( )(
r)
pg
∈
N
P
, i.e., r rg
p p
P
=
P
, then r(
)
xg xg
p p
K
∩
P
∈
Syl
K
, and henceK
xg∈ ∆
.Thus
g
∈
N
S X( )( )
∆
, then
Without loss of generality, we suppose that r
p
P
is a Sylowp
-subgroup of of course, Now wedenote by
1
1
:
r,
:
rp
p p
A
=
S
−B
=
S
− , A r,
B rp p
P
=
P
∩
A P
=
P
∩
B
. SinceG
=
A B
:
, we haveN
B(
P
B)
≅
/
(
r/ )
(
r) /
(
r) /
(
r)
(
r) /
(
r)
G A p G p G p G p G p A p
N
P A A
=
N
P
A A
≅
N
P
A
∩
N
P
=
N
P
N
P
, so that(
r)
(
r) :
(
)
G p A p B B
N
P
=
N
P
N
P
. In the sequel, we determine the structure ofN
A(
P
pr)
. Obviously,Choose an element
x
=
( ,
x x
1 2,...,
x
pr−1;1)
∈
N
A(
P
pr)
, then we have rx p
g
∈
P
for any element
g
=
( ,
g g
1 2,...,
g
pr−1;
g
0)
∈
P
pr, where That isSince
g
0 can be chosen randomly, we can get(
)
pi S p
Rulin Shen* and Ronghua Tan On sylow numbers of the alternating simple groups
is a transitive group with degree
p
s p( r−1) , then for any hence i g0i
x
=
x
. Furthermore,pairs
,
{1, 2,...,
r 1}
i j
∈
p
− , there exists an element such thati
g0=
j
, andhence
x
1=
x
2=
...
=
x
pr−1. Conversely, ifx
=
( ,
x x
1 2,...,
x
pr−1;1)
and 1(
)
p
S p
x
∈
N
Z
, thenx
∈
N
A(
P
pr)
. Thus1 1
(
r)
r:
p
A p p p
N
P
=
Z
−Z
− . So we haveN
A(
P
pr)
=
N
A(
P
pr) :
N
B(
P
B)
≅
1 1
(
pr:
) :
(
)
p p B B
Z
−Z
−N
P
. Therefore,1
1 1 1
(
r)
(
r:
) :
(
r)
r r
p p
p
S p p p S p
N
P
Z
−Z
N
P
−−
−
≅
. By the induction forr
, we can obtainStep: 2 If
n
=
a p
r r+
k
, then where0
≤
k
<
p
r.Let
Ω =
{1, 2,3,..., }
n
,{
i1,
i 11,...,
i 1 r1}
i
X
=
p
−p
−+
p
−+
p
−
in which1
≤ ≤
i
a
r and 0\
ar1i i
X
= Ω ∪
=X
. SetD
={
X X X
0, 1,
2,...,
X
pr−1}
. ThenClearly,
S
( )
Ω
D includes a Sylowp
-subgroupP
n ofS
( )
Ω
. Denote byK
i:
=
S X
(
i),
1
≤ ≤
i
a
r, andK
:
=
K
1.Set ( )
( ) {
x|
( ),
x(
x)}.
S n n p
Fun
ΩP
K
x
S
K
P
Syl K
∆ =
=
∈
Ω
∩
∈
In this case,
∆
is a maximal set of pair-wise commuting fundamental subgroups ofK
inS
pr. It is clearthat
|1
r 1}
iK
≤ <
i
p
−⊆ ∆
. If there exists an elementg
∈
S
( )
Ω
such thatK
g∈ ∆
andK
g≠
K
i for eachi
.Denote by
K
g:
=
S g X
( (
1))
. Obviously,
g X
(
1)
≠
K
i for eachi
. Since r( ( ))
gp p
K
∩
P
∈
Syl S
Ω
, then there is aSylow
p
-subgroupP
ofK
g such thatP
≤
P
n. Now we can assume thata
=
(123... )
p
∈
K
∩
P
n ,then
a P
,
≤
P
n. Suppose thatX
i∩
g X
(
1)
≠ ∅
for somei
, and set|
X
i∩
g X
(
1) |
=
t
, where1
≤ ≤
t
p
−
1
.Without loss of generality, we can assume that
g X
(
1) {1, 2,..., ,
=
t
i i
1, ,...,
2i
p t−}
. Similarly, for anyp
-cycleb
on
g X
(
1)
, we havea b
,
is not ap
-group by Lemma 1. Then suchP
does not exist, contradicts. So1
(
)
i
X
∩
g X
= ∅
for anyi
, theng X
(
1)
⊆
X
0, which contradicts the fact that| (
g X
1) | |
>
X
0|
. Therefore,1
{
|1
r}
i
K
≤ ≤
i
p
−= ∆
. ThenRulin Shen* and Ronghua Tan On sylow numbers of the alternating simple groups
It is easy to see that r r
a
n k p
P
=
P
×
P
, soStep: 3 Now we continue to decompose
k
into the suma
r−1p
r−1+
k
1, in which1 1
0
rk
p
−≤
<
$. Next we repeat todecompose
k
1, and so on. At last we can get thep
-adic expansion r 1 r 1...
1 0r r
a p
+
a
−p
−+
+
a p
+
a
byr
steps.Using the induction for
r
by the conclusions of step 1 and 2, we can obtain the result of the normalizer for generaln
:In the case of
p
=
2
, it is not hard to see|
( ) | |
|
nS n n
N
P
=
P
sincea
i=
0
or 1,then
S
n has a self-normalized Sylow 2-subgroup. Since|
S
n:
A
n| 2
=
, we have the Sylowp
-number ofS
n issame as the one of
A
n forp
>
2
. Ifp
=
2
, we use the result of Kondrat'ev’s [3]:A
n has a self-normalizedSylow 2-subgroup for
n
≥
6
.So the number of Sylow
p
-subgroups of the alternating groupA n
n(
≥
6)
is1 2 2 ... ( )
0 1
!
! !... !
s n(
1)
a a rarr
n
a a
a p
p
−
+ + + .REFERENCE:
[1] Carter R., Fong P., The Sylow 2-subgroups of the finite classical groups, J. Algebra, 1(1964) 139-151.
[2] Dmitruk, Yu. V., Sushchanskii V. I., Structure of Sylow 2-subgroups of the alternating groups and normalizers of Sylow subgroups in the symmetric and alternating groups, Ukrainian Mathematical Journal, 3(1981)235-241.
[3] Kondrat’ev A. S., Normalizers of the Sylow 2-Subgroups in Finite Simple Groups, Mathematical Notes 78(34), 338-346.
[4] Robinson D. J. S., A Course in the Theory of Groups, Springer-Verlag, 1982.
[5] Zhang J., Sylow numbers of finite groups, J. Algebra., 176(1995), 111-12.
! " # $%& '() " "