• No results found

2014 WEB/AUDIOCONFERENCES

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "2014 WEB/AUDIOCONFERENCES"

Copied!
28
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Developing a Relationship Management System

Presented by:

Jennifer Filla

July 10, 2014

1:00 – 2:30 p.m. Eastern Noon – 1:30 p.m. Central 11:00 a.m. – 12:30 p.m. Mountain 10:00 –11:30 a.m. Pacific 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. Alaska

Association of Fundraising Professionals

4300 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22203-4168 800-666-3863 (U.S. & Canada) • 866-837-1948 (Mexico) www.afpnet.org

(2)

The Association of Fundraising Professionals

WEB/AUDIOCONFERENCE 2014 July 10, 2014

Jennifer Filla

Developing a Relationship Management System

If an AFP Chapter is sponsoring this site, please check the box and list the name of the sponsoring AFP Chapter:

____________________________________________________________

Site Coordinator/Registrant (the name of the person to whom the site is registered):

_______________________________________________________________________________________ Location (City)______________________________________(State/Province)_______________________ Total number of participants at this site ______________

Please Print Clearly

NAME: EMAIL ADDRESS: MEMBER (Y/N)

_________________________________ ________________________________________ _____________ _________________________________ ________________________________________ _____________ _________________________________ ________________________________________ _____________ _________________________________ ________________________________________ _____________ _________________________________ ________________________________________ _____________ _________________________________ ________________________________________ _____________ _________________________________ ________________________________________ _____________ _________________________________ ________________________________________ _____________ _________________________________ ________________________________________ _____________ _________________________________ ________________________________________ _____________ _________________________________ ________________________________________ _____________ _________________________________ ________________________________________ _____________ _________________________________ ________________________________________ _____________ _________________________________ ________________________________________ _____________ _________________________________ ________________________________________ _____________ _________________________________ ________________________________________ _____________

(3)

was excited to transfer her skills. Now she leads Aspire Research Group,

ensuring that fundraising operations across the country have access to the

benefits of professional prospect research. She is a popular speaker and trainer

on using prospect research effectively.

Jen received a B.S. from Neumann University and is a member of the

Association for Professional Researchers for Advancement (APRA) and the

Association for Fundraising Professionals (AFP). She co-wrote with Helen Brown

the book,

Prospect Research for Fundraisers: The Essential Guide

, which is part

of the Wiley/AFP Fund Development Series. She is a former trustee of Habitat for

Humanity of Delaware County and The Center Foundation.

(4)

with Jen Filla

Aspire Research Group LLC

Jen Filla, President

Aspire Research Group LLC

Aspire Research Group assists organizations throughout the country that are...

• Concerned about finding the right prospects

(5)

At the end of this webinar, you should be able to...

1. Explain the three main parts

2. Name the fundamental pieces

3. Get started creating (or tweaking)

Actions or Moves Ratings

(6)

solid prospect management programs.

Organizations that seemingly out-raise their

potential have dedicated systems focused on their

constituents. The entire organization revolves

around the prospect relationship.

-Joshua Birkholz in Fundraising Analytics: Using Data to Guide Strategy

No urgency to reach goals (what goals?)

Spend your scarce time with those who can’t give

(7)

In your office, does everyone know what actions lead to a major gift?

1. Yes! We have agreed on a few simple, clear actions.

2. Yes! But we have more than 5 types of actions to be tracked. 3. No. Actions? Is that the same

as sending mail appeals?

Phone calls

Face to Face Visits

And those other things...

Benevon Point of Entry

Tours

Corporate and

Foundation Relations

Actions or Moves Ratings Reports

(8)

It’s an action if one of these

happened:

Outcomes met the purpose

Advanced the prospect

relationship

Something new was learned

Contact resulted in a next

step

Credit: Lisa Howley at Johns Hopkins

Actions or Moves Ratings Reports

Assign numbers

Look at past

performance and/or

track and then evaluate

Incorporate into your

staff performance

outcomes

Actions or Moves Ratings Reports

(9)

Gift Asked Gift Made

Months between 1st action & gift

# of F2F Visits # of Phone Calls $100,000 $50,000 18 3 5 $1 MM $1.5 MM 24 15 23 $500,000 $500,000 19 5 10 Average (Mean) 20 8 13

Remember Mean – Median – Mode?

Does your leadership use the reporting from your Relationship Management System to make decisions or otherwise take action?

1. Yes! We know if we are going to meet our fundraising goals. 2. No. Reports? What reports? 3. System? We don’t have a

(10)

Actions

Prospect Review

Leadership Review

Actions or Moves Ratings Reports

Daily, weekly, monthly

Whatever works to make

sure you take the action

Every prospect assigned to a

staff member should have an

action in the future

Actions or Moves Ratings

(11)

In-person meeting

Review all prospects in pool

Review prospects that

haven’t moved

Discuss obstacles

Assign new prospects

Do NOT make this a recitation

of visits made!

Should be one-hour or less

Actions or Moves Ratings

Reports

Who What Jan Feb Mar

DD Face to Face Visits 5 10 15

DD Phone Calls 30 25 40

ED Face to Face Visits 2 5 4

(12)

As of: Successful Solicitation % of Goal Planned Solicitation Total Solicitation % of Goal Campaign Goal for FY2013 6/11/2013 $125,000 50% $285,000 $410,000 164% $250,000

Has your fundraising office had the donor database screened for wealth?

1. Yes! We used a vendor and the ratings are in the database. 2. No. We have not had a wealth

(13)

• Using the term loosely – includes key fields for tracking

• Minimum fields: • Capacity

• Affinity/Inclination/Propensity • Readiness or Prospect Stage • Target Ask and Date

• Assigned staff Actions or Moves Ratings Reports Track Prioritize Report • Leadership Buy-In

• Policies and procedures

• Tied to Performance

(14)

• If your executive director refuses to enter any call reports...

• If leadership doesn’t want it, staff accountability suffers

Policy solves problems like these:

• Multiple interpretations of terms

• Confusion over who is responsible

• How to solve disputes

Procedures solves problems like these:

• Staff leaves and new person has no idea how to enter a contact report

• Staff with only partial role forgets what to do

(15)

• Gift officers must be evaluated on specific action and other goals

• “If it’s not in the database, it didn’t happen”

• “If it’s not in the database, it didn’t happen”

• As much as possible, reports should print right from the database

(16)

Small local food bank

Community hospital

University with multiple schools

Reports

Ratings

Actions

• Daily action

dashboard

• Monthly action report that gets reviewed weekly in a 20-min impromptu • Quarterly prospect review • Executive review of dollar goal • Casual performance review from monthly

• RFM score

• Capacity

• Solicitation status

• Proposal – target ask; target ask date; gift amount

• Assigned staff

• Tracking face to face, calls and tours • Description of what happened – no special format • Always a future action (prospect review helps)

(17)

Reports

Ratings

Actions

• Daily action dashboard • Monthly prospect review meeting • VP review of $$ and performance (3 reports) • Annual performance reviews • Capacity rating • Affinity score • Prospect stage • Prospect type • Proposal – target ask; target ask date; gift amount; gift type • Assigned staff • Assigned board member • Tracking face to face, calls, stewardship • Description of what happened – no special format • Always a future action

Reports

Ratings

Actions

• Dashboard with

actions & key metrics

• Weekly action & performance report reviewed with supervisor • Monthly prospect review meeting • VP review of $$ and performance for each school • Quarterly performance reviews • Capacity rating • Affinity score • Inclination score • Internal Score • Prospect stage • Prospect readiness • Prospect type • Proposal – target ask; target ask date; gift amount; gift type

• Assigned primary and secondary staff

• Assigned volunteer • Tracking all actions attached to major gift proposal by type • Specific format • Always a future action

(18)

Take Action!

• Leadership: Do you need it? Does leadership want it? Will staff be held accountable for performance?

• Actions/Moves: Sketch a flow chart for your major gift cycle. Turn that into a first draft of your relationship management policy. • Infrastructure: Can your database handle

what you need? Are additional modules available? Do you have the manpower for the roles you describe in your policy?

Jennifer Filla

Aspire Research Group

[email protected] Twitter: @jenfilla

(19)

Andrew Welkley Product Marketing Manager

@blackbaud

Your Guide to the Donor Experience

As people have evolved, so have their fundraising preferences and expectations. The Constituent Lifecycle, the latest eBook from Blackbaud, breaks the lifecycle of a constituent into four steps, identifying strategies you can apply to connect with and engage supporters in today’s digital world. www.blackbaud.com/desktopreference

For a listing of the 2014 AFP Webinar Series, please visit our website at www.afpnet.org in the professional development section.

Coming Next….

July 22, 2014 1:00 – 2:30 p.m. ET

Building Donor Loyalty: How to

Double Your Major Gift Revenue

(20)

The 3 Gears in Motion

1.

Actions or Moves

• Actual calls and face-to-face visits with prospects • This is the largest piece in terms of time, energy and

resources

2.

Ratings

• Ratings prioritize your list and keep you focused on those who are most willing and capable

• Ratings are the items you track so that you can measure your progress and might include:

o Capacity

o Affinity and Inclination o Readiness or Prospect Stage o Target Ask and Target Ask Date

3.

Reports

• Actions – Frequent or daily report to keep on top of and count the actions that matter most • Prospect Review – Report that allows you to regularly review the assigned donor pool • Executive Review – Report that demonstrates your team’s progress toward goal at a glance

Super User Tips

Lisa Howley, Director of Relationship Management at Johns Hopkins Institutions, uses a clear definition of an action you may wish to adopt at your organization. An action must meet one of the following criteria:

• Outcomes met the purpose

• Advanced the prospect relationship • Something new was learned

• Contact resulted in a next step

In his book, Fundraising Analytics: Using Data to Guide Strategy, Joshua Birkholz calls upon his years and experience as a consultant to make the following statement:

Actions or Moves Ratings

(21)

Remember that creating and implementing a prospect tracking system will create more work for your team. It means recording information and meeting and reviewing regularly to be sure you are on track. The goal is to turn that extra effort into stronger performance - more and larger gifts. A tight focus on prospects should also begin to shorten the time between identification and solicitation.

Keep prospect review meetings to under two hours and set the agenda to match the need. For example, if gift officers are not moving highly rated prospects, set the agenda to review specific prospects. As you near the end of the third quarter, you might want to set the agenda to review all solicitations scheduled to close in the fiscal year.

In her book, A Kaleidoscope of Prospect Development: The Shapes and Shades of Major Donor Prospecting, Bobbie J. Strand tells us the following:

Prospect management meetings are intended (and, therefore, should be designed) to bring development staff together in a routine and systematic fashion so that they can:

Build skills and share insights

Discuss management issues they may have with new or assigned prospects

Share and review prospect information

Assign management for strategic plans and actions

Track individual prospect and overall fundraising progress

Whether you are planning a new prospect tracking system or re-structuring an existing system, be sure to set aside enough time to think it through carefully and test it out with staff member feedback. Any system you implement needs to work both in the database and with every staff member who must interact with it.

Get leadership to weigh-in early on about what is most important to know. What questions do they want to have answered about prospects? If you are in a small development office you may find that you can work well answering a few key items about your prospect pool. If you are in a very large office

(22)

Rank your current Relationship Management system from 1 to 10 on the line for each area. 1 is the center of the circle and 10 is the outside of the circle by the words.

What works well in your Relationship Management system?

What needs to be changed?

Is your system too simple or too complicated to raise productivity?

Actions

Proposals

Ratings

Action

Reports

Executive

Review

Clean

Data

Urgency /

Commitment

Prospect

Review

(23)

Relationship Management Policies

University of Chicago, Prospect Management Process & Policy Guidelines (2011)

https://griffinhelp.uchicago.edu/griffinhelp/Policy%20%20Procudure%20Documents/UniversityPMPolicy-4-28-2011.pdf

University of Washington, University Advancement, Relationship Management Policy (2011)

https://depts.washington.edu/uwadv/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/University-of-Washington-CURRENT-Relationship-Management-Policy.pdf

University of Southern California, University Advancement, Relationship Management Policies

and Procedures (2011)

http://www.usc.edu/advancement/pdfs/RMATS/USC%20RMATS%20Policies-and-Procedures.pdf

RMIT University (Australia), Donor Relationship Management Procedures (2012)

http://www.rmit.edu.au/browse;ID=s1nwtrxxa1fu

4 essential elements of relationship management (Lisa Howley), The NonProfit Times (2011)

(24)

Rating Term: “Capacity” “Wealth” “Ability”

What it is: The largest dollar range within which the prospect is capable of giving

Who does it: Usually determined through research such as a wealth screening, peer review, or a profile

What it might look like: $1 million+

$500,000-$999,999 $50,000-$499,000 $5,000-$49,999

Rating Term: “Inclination” “Propensity”

What it is: Past giving to you or other organizations, private foundation giving, and volunteer and leadership positions; also known as philanthropic inclination

Who does it: Usually determined through research; might become known through conversation or news interviews with the prospect

What it might look like: Donor to us - Donor to us and others - Donor to others - Non-donor

Rating Term: “Affinity”

What it is: How close the prospect is to your organization (e.g., trustees are very close and someone who has no contact with you is not close)

Who does it: Can be determined by indicators in your database (e.g., event attendance, consecutive giving, volunteering, etc.) and through personal contact with the prospect

What it might look like: Insider - Active - Inactive - Distant

Rating Term: “Readiness” “Prospect Stage”

What it is: How ready the prospect is to make a gift; what stage of the gift cycle is s/he in

Who does it: Usually determined by the person who is interacting directly with the prospect or based on that Could this fit your

(25)

I was a participant in the AFP Webinar held

July 10, 2014

1:00 – 2:30 PM Eastern

Developing a Relationship Management System

Presented by:

Jennifer Filla

Full participation in this session is applicable for 1.5 points in Category 1.B – Education of the CFRE International application for initial certification and/or recertification.

Signed__________________________________________________________

(26)

Please complete the evaluation online by July 17, 2014 at:

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/9M7ZKVN

EXCELLENT AVERAGE POOR

(7) (6) (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) 1. OVERALL RATING 2. CONTENT 3. HANDOUTS 4. AUDIO QUALITY 5. EASE OF REGISTRATION

6. SIMILARITY OF ACTUAL PROGRAM VERSUS ADVERTISED CONTENT

7. VALUE

PRESENTER: OVERALL EFFECTIVENESS 8. Jennifer Filla

MY SITE PARTICIPATED AS: A WEBCONFERENCE

AN AUDIOCONFERENCE

YES NO WOULD YOU PARTICIPATE IN ANOTHER VIRTUAL SEMINAR?

WHAT WAS YOUR OVERALL IMPRESSION OF THE EVENT AND THE VIRTUAL SEMINAR FORMAT? ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS?

(27)

JANUARY 28, 2014,TUESDAY

Inbound Marketing: The Latest Techniques To Attract More Donors, Volunteers and Others

Allan Pressel

FEBRUARY 12,2014,WEDNESDAY

Developing Earned Income Streams For Your Nonprofit

Mazarine Treyz

FEBRUARY 27,2014,THURSDAY

Firing Lousy Board Members – And Helping the Others Succeed

Simone Joyaux, ACFRE

MARCH 13,2014,THURSDAY

Millenial Motivation: What Makes Millenials Want To Give

S. Michelle Cline, J.D.

MARCH 26,2014,WEDNESDAY

The Shifting World of Business and Community

Jocelyne Daw, Joe Waters

APRIL 9,2014,WEDNESDAY

Creating a Breakthrough Strategy for Your Nonprofit

Robert Sheehan, Ph.D., CFRE

APRIL 24,2014,THURSDAY

Development from the Donor’s Perspective

Alice Ferris, MBA, ACFRE Jim Anderson

MAY 7,2014,WEDNESDAY

Major Gifts for Small Shops

Amy Eisenstein, ACFRE

MAY 20,2014,TUESDAY

Case Studies: 24 Hour Turn Around Campaigns

Michelle Conklin, CFRE

JUNE 12,2014,THURSDAY

6 Figure Fundraising: How to Create and Run Your First $100,000+ Major Gifts Campaign

Sandy Rees, CFRE

JUNE 25,2014,WEDNESDAY

Creative Design for Fundraising Campaigns

Derrick Feldmann

JULY 10, 2014,THURSDAY

Developing a Relationship Management System

Jennifer Filla

JULY 22,2014,TUESDAY

Building Donor Loyalty: How to Double Your Major Gift Revenue

Rachel Muir, CFRE

AUGUST 13,2014,WEDNESDAY

Opening the Door to Major Gifts: Mastering the Discovery Call

John Greenhoe, CFRE

SEPTEMBER 9,2014,TUESDAY

Extreme Social Media Makeover: Nonprofit Edition!

Allan Pressel

SEPTEMBER 24,2014,WEDNESDAY

Getting Your Organization Onboard with Fundraising: Weaving a Philanthropic Culture

Andrea McManus, CFRE

OCTOBER 8,2014,WEDNESDAY

Incorporating Stories Into Your Fundraising Program

Leah Eustace, CFRE

OCTOBER 21,2014,TUESDAY

Fundraising Basics

Brian Bonde, ACFRE

NOVEMBER 18,2014,TUESDAY

Growth in Giving/Fundraising Effectiveness Project

Erik Daubert, MBA, ACFRE

DECEMBER 10,2014,WEDNESDAY

Small Shop Success: Building Something from Nothing – Starting a Well-Rounded Development Program

Amy Wolfe, MPPA, CFRE

(28)

April 9, 2014 Creating a Breakthrough Strategy for Your Nonprofit – Robert Sheehan, Ph.D., CFRE

April 24, 2014 Development from the Donor’s Perspective – Alice Ferris, MBA, ACFRE and Jim Anderson

May 7, 2014 Major Gifts for Small Shops – Amy Eisenstein, ACFRE

May 20, 2014 Case Studies: 24 Hour Turn Around Campaigns – Michelle Conklin, CFRE

June 12, 2014 6 Figure Fundraising: How to Create and Run Your First $100,000+ Major Gifts Campaign – Sandy Rees, CFRE

June 25, 2014 Creative Design for Fundraising Campaigns – Derrick Feldmann

July 10, 2014 Developing a Relationship Management System – Jennifer Filla

July 22, 2014 Building Donor Loyalty: How to Double Your Major Gift Revenue – Rachel Muir, CFRE

August 13, 2014 Opening the Door to Major Gifts: Mastering the Discovery Call – John Greenhoe, CFRE

September 9, 2014 Extreme Social Media Makeover: Nonprofit Edition! – Allan Pressel

September 24, 2014 Getting Your Organization Onboard with Fundraising: Weaving a Philanthropic Culture – Andrea McManus. CFRE

October 8, 2014 Incorporating Stories into Your Fundraising Program – Leah Eustace, CFRE

October 21, 2014 Fundraising Basics – Brian Bonde, ACFRE

November 18, 2014 Growth in Giving/Fundraising Effectiveness Project – Erik Daubert, MBA, ACFRE

December 10, 2014 Small Shop Success: Building Something from Nothing – Starting a Well-Rounded Development Program – Amy Wolfe

MPPA, CFRE

This order is for [ ] Live Event, [ ] Download, [ ] CD ($8.95 for shipping in the U.S., $20 for International orders)

Webconferences will be held at 1:00-2:30 p.m. Eastern / 12:00-1:30 p.m. Central 11:00 a.m.–12:30 p.m. Mountain / 10:00-11:30 a.m. Pacific / 9:00-10:30 a.m. Alaska

FEES: $159 (U.S.) per member site per session; $295 (U.S.) per nonmember site per session Special AFP Member Bundle - $99 per session when registering for 10 or more programs at one time! Four ways to register:

Online: http://afp.peachnewmedia.com

Fax: 781-723-0433

Phone: 770-805-6292

Mail: Peach New Media, 1100 Circle 75 Parkway, Suite 900, Atlanta, GA 30339

Please print clearly (especially the email address)

Name_____________________________________________________Member ID#_________________________Title__________________________ Organization________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ [ ] My Site is sponsored by an AFP Chapter Chapter Name _________________________________________________________________

Street Address______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ City__________________________________________State/Province__________________Zip/Postal Code_________________Country_________ Phone____________________________________Fax___________________________Email______________________________________________

Can’t make a Webconference? Purchase the recorded session as a download or on CD.

Call 877-728-3904 or visit our website at http://afp.peachnewmedia.com

(Payment must accompany registration and must be paid in U.S. funds) Method of payment (check one):

[ ] Check enclosed payable to Peach New Media

[ ] MasterCard [ ] VISA [ ] AMEX [ ] Discover

Card #_______________________________________CVV Code_________Exp._____________ Signature__________________________________

References

Related documents

Examples of political-economy approaches adopted by donors include the Drivers of Change approach developed by the UK’s Department for International Development in the early 2000s,

Alternatively, at a facility such as the Curtis and Elizabeth Anderson Cancer Institute (ACI) at Memorial University Medical Center, a top-notch physician might have a newer or

Nasrin Ghasemi , Department of Medical Genetics, Research and Clinical Centre for Infertility, Shahid Sadoughi University Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.. Infertile couples

In peptide B, the anomalous peptide obtained by chymotryptic hydrolysis of albumin B, the only amino acid present with a positive charge at pH 4.29 or pH 3.6 was lysine; arginine

In the present study unconjugated plasma 17- ketosteroids were measured in normal subjects and in patients with fever of known origin, familial Mediterranean fever and

With respect to extra- cellular fluid volume and exchangeable sodium, although statistically significant elevations of these measurements were present in the aldosterone group, many

sented data on the phospholipid composition of platelets and leukocytes from leukemic patients, and the results of studies on the incorporation of P32-labeled orthophosphate (P32)

It was con- sidered that if Starling's law of the heart operated in patients with mitral stenosis, the characteristics of each left ventricular contraction should appear to be