• No results found

THE SCENARIO APPROACH to STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "THE SCENARIO APPROACH to STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION"

Copied!
96
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

THE SCENARIO APPROACH

to

STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION

Marco C. Campi University of Brescia Italy

(2)

“What I like about experience is that it is such an honest thing. … You may have deceived yourself, but experience is not trying to deceive you.”

(3)

thanks to: Algo Care’ Giuseppe Calafiore Maria Prandini Bernardo Pagnoncelli Federico Ramponi Simone Garatti

(4)

classification controller synthesis portfolio selection optimization program optimization

(5)

uncertain environment exercise caution classification controller synthesis portfolio selection optimization program optimization

(6)
(7)

uncertain optimization:

not a valid mathematical formulation

(8)

uncertain optimization:

not a valid mathematical formulation

often, a description of uncertainty is not available, or it is only partially available

(9)
(10)

scenario-based knowledge:

knowledge about uncertainty can be acquired

through experience,

that is, we look at previous cases, or scenarios, of

(11)

example: portfolio optimization

(12)

example: portfolio optimization

[with B. Pagnoncelli & D. Reich]

(13)

example: portfolio optimization

[with B. Pagnoncelli & D. Reich]

1$

(14)

= percentage of capital invested on asset

example: portfolio optimization

[with B. Pagnoncelli & D. Reich]

1$

(15)

= percentage of capital invested on asset

example: portfolio optimization

[with B. Pagnoncelli & D. Reich]

1$

(16)

= percentage of capital invested on asset

example: portfolio optimization

[with B. Pagnoncelli & D. Reich]

1$

(17)

example: portfolio optimization

(18)

record of past rate of returns:

= return of asset over period

example: portfolio optimization

[with B. Pagnoncelli & D. Reich]

(19)

example: portfolio optimization

[with B. Pagnoncelli & D. Reich]

(scenarios) record of past rate of returns:

(20)

example: classification - defibrillation

(21)

example: classification - defibrillation

[with A. Caré]

decide whether a defibrillator has to be applied

(22)

example: classification - defibrillation

[with A. Caré]

(23)

example: classification - defibrillation

[with A. Caré]

(24)

“scenario” optimization (convex case)

(25)

min-max “scenario” optimization

(26)

min-max “scenario” optimization

[with G. Calafiore] convex in

(27)

[with G. Calafiore] convex in

(28)

[with G. Calafiore] convex in

(29)

[with G. Calafiore] convex in

(30)

[with G. Calafiore] convex in

(31)

[with G. Calafiore] convex in

(32)

what are the guarantees for unseen situations?

(33)

how guaranteed is for another ? what are the guarantees

(34)

from the “visible” to the “invisible”

how guaranteed is for another ? what are the guarantees

(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)

comments

generalization need for structure

good news: the structure we need

(47)

… more comments

N depends on how complex the decision is via

(48)

… more comments

don’t try to reconstruct the real world to answer easy

questions!

N depends on how complex the decision is via

(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)

… more comments (IPM = Interval Prediction Model)

(53)
(54)

… more comments

(55)

… more comments

N is independent of Pr (distribution-free result)

“What I like about experience is that it is such an honest thing. … You may have deceived yourself, but experience is not trying to deceive you.”

(56)

a more general theoretical result

(57)
(58)

risk

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0 5 10

(59)

risk

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0 5 10

(60)

risk

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0 5 10

(61)

risk

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0 5 10

(62)

risk

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0 5 10

(63)

risk

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0 5 10

(64)

risk

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0 5 10

(65)

risk

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0 5 10

(66)

risk

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0 5 10

(67)
(68)
(69)
(70)
(71)

generalizations and beyond

(72)
(73)
(74)
(75)
(76)
(77)
(78)
(79)
(80)
(81)
(82)
(83)
(84)
(85)
(86)
(87)

generalizations

relevanto to: quantitative finance (minimum return)

(88)

Many have given a contribution:

T. Álamo, G. Andersson, F. Borrelli, G. Calafiore, A. Carè, F. Dabbene, L. Fagiano, S. Garatti, P. Goulart, O. Granichin, J.

Hespanha, H. Hjalmarsson, G. Iyengar, T. Kanamori, D. Kuhn, C. Lagoa, J. Luedtke, A. Luque, J. Lygeros, K. Margellos, M. Morari, J. Matuško, B. Pagnoncelli, M. Prandini, F. Ramponi, D, Reich, C. Rojas, B. Rustem, G. Schildbach, M. Sznaier, A. Takeda, R.

Tempo, B. Van Parys, P. Vayanos, M. Vrakopoulou, J. Welsh, W. Wiesemann

(89)
(90)

non-convex the theory is still in its infancy

(91)

margin the theory is still in its infancy

(92)

the problem of extracting knowledge from observations is perhaps the most central issue of all science

(93)

the scenario approach is one way, and a lot of work remains to be done

the problem of extracting knowledge from observations is perhaps the most central issue of all science

(94)

certainly:

it is a wonderful world to explore!

the scenario approach is one way, and a lot of work remains to be done

the problem of extracting knowledge from observations is perhaps the most central issue of all science

(95)

certainly:

it is a wonderful world to explore!

THANK YOU!

the scenario approach is one way, and a lot of work remains to be done

the problem of extracting knowledge from observations is perhaps the most central issue of all science

(96)

REFERENCES

M.C. Campi and S. Garatti.

The Exact Feasibility of Randomized Solutions of Uncertain Convex Programs.

SIAM J. on Optimization, 19, no.3: 1211-1230, 2008. M.C. Campi and S. Garatti.

A Sampling-and-Discarding Approach to Chance-Constrained Optimization: Feasibility and Optimality.

J. of Optimization Theory and Applications, 148: 257-280, 2011. B.K. Pagnoncelli, D. Reich and M.C. Campi

Risk-Return Trade-off with the Scenario Approach: A Case study in Portfolio Selection.

J. Of Optimization Theory and Applications, 155: 707-722, 2012. G. Calafiore and M.C. Campi.

Uncertain Convex Programs: randomized Solutions and Confidence Levels.

Mathematical Programming, 102: 25-46, 2005. G. Calafiore and M.C. Campi.

The Scenario Approach to Robust Control Design.

IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, AC-51: 742-753, 2006. M.C. Campi, G. Calafiore and S. Garatti.

Interval Predictor Models: Identification and Reliability.

Automatica, 45: 382-392, 2009. M.C. Campi.

Classification with guaranteed probability of error.

References

Related documents

Investigate whether cash flows can predict future share returns for companies on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, and to what extent investors can use this information to

As shown in Panel A of Table 2, over the period from 1980 to 2004, if using the value- weighted aggregate accruals as the sole predictive variable, the market timing strategy

Patients are advised that results of BOTOX treatment for migraine headaches may be variable and improvement in this disorder may not occur following BOTOX treatments..

However, Obsorne and Gaebler (1992) opine that there was a need to reinvent government and harness the entrepreneurial spirit to transform the public sector and later “banish

In this paper the likelihood ratio to test between two Beta distributions is addressed. The exact distribution of the likelihood ratio statistic, for simple hypotheses, is ob- tained

The study reports a significant difference between an expected equal distribution and observed distribution of birth dates by year half, quartile and month in amateur boxing..

[ 59 ] performed an in vitro biomechanical comparison of two-part fractures treated with an S3 plate and the Syn- thes locking plate and recorded higher stiffness for the S3 plate

Effectiveness of POSS and POSS containing antibiotic formulary against a bacterial challenge was investigated in the pig skin wound model over a similar 48 hour time