• No results found

Utility Service Status Update September 23, 2009

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Utility Service Status Update September 23, 2009"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Learn@UW Utility Service Status Update

September 23, 2009

Fall ’09

The start to the fall semester is going extremely well. The system is handling increased traffic with relative ease and the service experienced no major outages during the start of the semester.

We track login attempts as one measurement to assess use of the service (see graph below). There was an 8% decrease in login attempts during the start of the fall semester when compared to fall ’08. The decrease is

explained by two factors: 1) the nine-day period for fall ’09 included the Labor Day holiday and weekend, 2) the UW campuses had a more staggered schedule for the start of the fall ’09 semester as compared to fall ’08. The Learn@UW Utility did not have a full load of campuses until September 9, 2009.

941,492

1,190,117

1,358,024

1,246,420

0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000

Aggregate Login Attempts

Fall '09 Fall '08

Fall '07 Fall '06

Fall Usage - 9 days at start of semester

A review of the peak login attempts (see graph on the next page) depicts an increase in login attempts towards the latter part of the first nine days.

It is interesting to note that hourly login attempts typically peak around mid- day, except for Sundays when the peak occurs during the evening.

(2)

Peak Login Attempts (Fall '09 v. Fall '08)

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000

Sept. 2 Sept. 3 Sept. 4 Sept. 5 Sept. 6 Sept. 7 Sept. 8 Sept. 9 Sept. 10

Fall '09 Fall '08

What contributed to this success?

 Testing and assessment of new version, D2L 8.4 MR2/MR3, in advance of the upgrade that occurred prior to the start of the semester.

 Continued development and deployment of process and infrastructure improvements to provide a high-quality, robust, and reliable service.

 Sharing of information with colleagues at peer institutions using D2L

 Campus liaisons, Learn@UW/D2L Steering Committee, UW System Administration, Learn@UW Utility staff, and other stakeholders Learn@UW Traffic in Aggregate

The following chart shows Learn@UW traffic through the first two weeks of the semester (Tuesday, September 1 – Saturday, September 12). A pattern clearly emerges depicting the usage behavior of students and faculty.

(3)

Spring ‘09

Each semester the number of faculty and students using the Learn@UW service, hosting the D2L course management system, continues to grow.

The number of Learn@UW courses offered in spring ’09 increased 11% when compared to spring ’08. The same percentage increase occurred with the number of active enrollments (see the “Learn@UW Usage Growth” chart depicting growth in courses and enrollments from fall ’03 to spring ‘09).

Most of these courses supplement face-to-face (f2f) rather than fully online courses. Of the 173,000 students enrolled in the UW 145,074 (84%) are active users of Learn@UW, and they are indeed active (see the “Learn@UW Usage Breakdown by Campus (spring ’09)” table for a breakdown of courses and active enrollments by campus).

Usage typically peaks at the start of each week and remains steady throughout the end of the semester. There is student activity 24 hours a day, with peak usage occurring at midday and mid-evening.

Learn@UW Usage Growth

11,886

13,298 13,569 15,711

15,123

7,755

3,007

7,817 9,883

11,613 10,985

1,373

0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000

Fall 2003 Spring 2004

Fall 2004 Spring 2005

Fal l 2005

Spring 2006 Fall 20

06

Spring 2007 Fall 2007

Spring 2008 Fall 20

08

Spring 2009 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 Enrollments

Courses

(4)

Learn@UW Usage Breakdown by Campus (spring ’09) Institution1 Courses Active

Enrollments

UW-Colleges 1,035 23,933

UW-Colleges Online 80 2,141

UW-Eau Claire 716 24,924

UW-Extension 7 81

UW-Green Bay 333 14,418

UW-La Crosse 675 25,388

UW Learning Innovations 184 2,934

UW-Madison 1,720 77,681

UW-Milwaukee 2,023 96,284

UW-Oshkosh 2,136 49,901

UW-Parkside 319 9,733

UW-Platteville 1,721 38,900

UW-River Falls 754 20,781

UW-Stevens Point 662 22,919

UW-Stout 1,075 29,840

UW-Superior 630 10,366

UW System 67 1,437

UW-Whitewater 986 35,759

Totals 15,123 487,420

Learn@UW Grade Submission by Campus (spring ’09)

Use of the Grade Submission tool has increased when compared to spring

’08. The number of faculty using the functionality increased 41%, submitting 20% more grades within 46% more sections than spring ’08. This change represents significant growth in the use of the Grade Submission tool.

Institution # of

Grades # of Sections

Average # of Grades per

Section # of

Instructors

UW-Colleges 1,015 51 19.9 23

UW-Green Bay 5,235 129 40.58 51

UW-Madison 11,660 192 60.73 95

UW-Milwaukee 13,995 360 38.88 133

UW-Oshkosh 6,678 184 36.29 65

UW-River Falls 5,143 194 26.51 70

UW-Whitewater 6,043 191 31.64 66

Totals 49,769 1,301 503

(5)

Learn@UW Concurrent Connections by Campus

The following charts show Learn@UW connections by campus throughout the first month of the spring ’09 semester (Monday, January 19 – Tuesday,

February 17, 2009).

References

Related documents

After installing the hard disk drives, make sure to set the necessary RAID items in the BIOS before setting your RAID configuration.. To set the BIOS

To covertly send messages using BitTorrent trackers, a client could hide information in the peer id field during an announce request.. To receive the message,

In the paper, the system reliability indices computed include: Average Failure Rate at Load point, Annual outage duration at Load Point, Average outage Dura- tion at Load Point,

(2) For NAS Domain devices with IP connections to non-NAS Networks or non-NAS Systems that do not conform to 5.b.(l), ISOs must migrate their device(s) to approved internal

Решение задачи строится в виде суммы решений двух частных задач: первой является задача для двухкомпонентной плоскости со скачками

Strategic Plan – Major Components Mission Vision Goals Objectives Strategies Action Plans Measures Targets..

[r]

The similarity measurements between image fea- tures (distribution parameters) are performed by using the approach proposed in [16]. This approach is extended so as to make