• No results found

Implementing Short Text Cryptography through Matrix Operations

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Implementing Short Text Cryptography through Matrix Operations"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

K.Karthikeyan , IJRIT- 331 International Journal of Research in Information Technology (IJRIT)

www.ijrit.com ISSN 2001-5569

Implementing Short Text Cryptography through Matrix Operations

1K.Karthikeyan, 2Ansu Miriam Varghese, 3 Neethu Santhosh (1)Associate Professor, SAS, VIT University, Vellore (2,3)School of Information Technology & Engineering

VIT University, Vellore, India

Abstract

Byte Rotation method has been implemented with a symmetric key cipher technique. A symmetric key cipher method converts plain text into its appropriate numerical form and generates a secret key during encryption. The same key is required to decrypt the message during decryption. This method can be used to encrypt passwords to save in the database in an encrypted form. The numerical form of data is stored in a matrix. Several operations are performed on the matrix to make the data, secure and less accessible. A slightly different approach has been used to share the secret key during the encryption and decryption mechanisms.

Keywords: Byte Rotation, symmetric cipher key, encryption and decryption

1. Introduction

Cryptography refers to different methods to secure information or hide information. Research has advanced widely in this field in order to protect confidential information from different sorts of attacks made by hackers.

Several algorithms have been devised to hide data. NIST which is abbreviated as the National Institute of Standards and Technology has declared the AES algorithm as the standard for Encryption. Here, a different method using the Symmetric Cipher key technique has been implemented. Symmetric key algorithms are algorithms that use the same shared secret key in order to encrypt the message and also to decrypt the message.

This technique uses a very traditional method of encrypting the message. The technique is similar to the Caesar Cipher technique. The Caesar Cipher technique involves replacing an alphabetwith another alphabet, where as in this paper, the alphabets are replaced by their corresponding ASCII values. Furthermore these numbers are then stored in matrix format and several matrix operations are performed on it to secure the data.

2. Existing work

2.1. Method I

In this method, Key undergoes rotation. The key is permuted in all possible ways by rotating 1 bit to the left.

Key length is determined by the formula Nk = Sum (key) mod key length.

(2)

K.Karthikeyan , IJRIT- 332 Depending on the Nk value, Nk number of permutations of the key are chosen and appended to make a long key. This they is used to substitute values of the plain text after Caesar cipher method. It further undergoes transposition to highlight the letters of the key on binary matrices. [6]

2.2. Method II

The existing technique is known as Byte Rotation Encryption algorithm (BREA). This technique converts the alphabets of the message to numbers and stores it in a matrix P of size 4x4.

A random key of 16 numbers are generated in the range 1 to 26. The key matrix K is converted into a binary format with the formula Ke = K mod 2. [5] The matrix P is then added to the matrix Ke. The resultant matrix further undergoes horizontal rotation, followed by vertical rotation. The last position in the matrix, position (3, 3) of the matrix always remains 0. The numbers in the resultant matrix are converted back to alphabets. Thus the message is encrypted. In order to decrypt the message, again a random key matrix is made generating 16 random numbers in the range 1 to 26. It is further used to decrypt the message by re-rotating the matrix both vertically and horizontally. The matrix is then separated from the binary key matrix to obtain the numerical matrix of the alphabets. The numbers in the matrix are further replaced by the alphabets to get the message.

3. New Algorithm

The same random key generated during the encryption mechanism is used to decrypt the message during decryption mechanism. This is the major difference from the existing work that has been implemented in this paper.

3.1. Encryption algorithm

1. Enter text in the range 8 to 15 characters without spaces and access the text.

2. Convert alphabets to ASCII value and store in byte array called “asciiBytes”.

3. Store ASCII values from byte array to a 4x4 matrix called “asciiMatrix”.

4. Generate random number in the range 65 to 122.

5. Subtract random number from 32767.

6. Convert result into binary value and store in matrix called “keyMatrix”.

7. Add “asciiMatrix” and “keyMatrix”.

8. Resultant matrix is called the “sumMatrix”.

9. Place random number in the last position of matrix.

10. Transpose matrix and perform horizontal rotation.

11. Convert matrix to a byte array.

12. Obtain string from array.

13. Display obtained cipher text in cipher text textbox.

3.2. Illustrating Encryption Algorithm

User Input is: HELLOHOWAREYOU Length of asciiBytes is: 14

(3)

K.Karthikeyan , IJRIT- 333 asciiMatrix:

72 69 76 76

79 72 79 87

65 82 69 89

79 85 0 0

Random Number: 111 Key: 32656

Binary string: 111111110010000 Length of binaryBytes is: 15

keyMatrix:

1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1

0 0 1 0

0 0 0 0

Adding asciiMatrix and keyMatrix

SumMatrix:

73 70 77 77

80 73 80 88

65 82 70 89

79 85 0 111

Rotated Matrix:

77 73 70 77

80 88 80 73

(4)

K.Karthikeyan , IJRIT- 334

82 70 89 65

79 85 0 111

Transpose of Rotated Matrix:

77 80 82 79

73 88 70 85

70 80 89 0

77 73 65 111

Size of encrypted array is: 16 Cipher text is: MPROIXFUFPY MIAo The length of cipher text is: 16

3.3. Decryption Algorithm:

1. Access string from encrypted text box.

2. Convert characters to ASCII value.

3. Store ASCII value into a byte array called “decryptAsciiBytes”.

4. Store values from array into a matrix called “decryptAsciiMatrix”.

5. Transpose matrix.

6. Rotate matrix.

7. Remove random number from last position of the matrix.

8. Generate key= 32767- random number.

9. Convert key to binary matrix.

10. Subtract binary matrix from sum matrix.

11. Convert resultant matrix to ASCII byte array.

12. Convert the ASCII values to string.

13. Display the decrypted text in the decrypted text box.

3.4 Illustrating The Decryption Algorithm

Length of decryptAsciiBytes is: 16 The decryptAsciiMatrix is:

77 80 82 79

73 88 70 85

(5)

K.Karthikeyan , IJRIT- 335

70 80 89 0

77 73 65 111

Decrypted Random Number: 111 The transposed matrix is:

77 73 70 77

80 88 80 73

82 70 89 65

79 85 32 111

The re-rotated matrix is:

73 70 77 77

80 73 80 88

65 82 70 89

79 85 32 111

The matrix after removing the random number is:

73 70 77 77

80 73 80 88

65 82 70 89

79 85 32 0

Binary string: 111111110010000 Length of binaryBytes is: 15 KeyMatrix:

1 1 1 1

(6)

K.Karthikeyan , IJRIT- 336

1 1 1 1

0 0 1 0

0 0 0 0

asciiMatrix:

72 69 76 76

79 72 79 87

65 82 69 89

79 85 32 0

Elements in the byte array:

72 69 76 76 79 72 79 87 65 82 69 89 79 85 32 0

Size of encrypted array is: 16

Decrypted text: HELLOHOWAREYOU The length of decrypted text is: 14

4. Highlights of new algorithm

This method successfully generates a cipher text. It does not depend on a total new key that is generated randomly during the decryption technique to decrypt the cipher text. It uses the same key that was used for encryption in decryption as well. This method uses less than 8 characters and more than 15 characters since it involves the usage of a 4x4 matrix. Hence it cannot be used for encrypting and decrypting a message to be transferred, but can only be used in encryption and decryption of passwords for a website, etc.

5. Conclusion

A simple, but effective technique has been used for the encryption and decryption of small sized text messages.

This paper can be concluded by restating the different techniques utilised in this mechanism. A small sized text after being replaced by numbers is stored in matrix format. It is further summed up with a key matrix followed by performing transpose and rotation operations on the resultant matrix. The above mechanisms are reversed in order to decrypt the encrypted message. Encryption and decryption of a text message can be made further stronger with more added operations on the matrix or the key.

(7)

K.Karthikeyan , IJRIT- 337

References

[1] Sairam Natarajan #1,“A Novel Approach for Data Security Enhancement Using Multi Level Encryption scheme”, Research paper, IJCSIT, Vol. 2 (1), 2011, 469-473.

[2] Daniel Lloyd Calloway, Dr. Hannon (Instructor), “Literature Review of Cryptography and its Role in Network Security Principles and Practices”, Lecture Notes, Capella University, OM8302, 8 Sept. 2008.

[3] Walter Tuchman , "A brief history of the data encryption standard", ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. NY, USA, pp. 275–280,1997.

[4] SunitaBhati&Prof. S.K. Sharma, “Block WiseParallel Encryption through Multithreading Concept” ( ISSN : 0975-3613) Vol. 3, August 2011, pp. 100-106.

[5] SunitaBhati, Anita Bhati,S. K. Sharma“A New Approach towards Encryption Schemes: Byte – Rotation Encryption Algorithm”.Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2012 Vol II WCECS 2012, October 24-26, 2012, San Francisco, USA.

[6] Sidra Malik, "A Novel Key-Based Transposition Scheme for Text Encryption", FIT, 2011, Frontiers of Information Technology, Frontiers of Information Technology 2011, pp. 201-205, doi:10.1109/FIT.2011.44

References

Related documents

MAFIOTISMUS = PERSONAL Power / on the top of state institutions / state and etc./ + Influence + Connections / to personal, private companies + Interests /

So, to summarize, the best solution for the company, given the criteria considered, obtained by the TOPSIS method is definitely a forklift truck 2. Depending on the financial

The aim of the study was to explore the factors that facilitated or inhibited gestational diabetes self-management among women in a socially deprived area.. Methods: Fifteen

WFG LASIK in eyes with diffractive IOLs did not affect multifocality of the lens, and the patients retained about the same corrected near and distance visual acuity following

Comparing simulated parameters for each iteration of Koch fractal antenna like reflection coefficient, VSWR, gain with conventional triangular patch antenna, we can

Fernandes and Duarte [26,31] present an architecture that aims to provide efficient routing, proper resource isolation and a secure communication channel between routers and the

We choose the year 1950 as the base year for assessing the increase in hoarding demand because from 1950 on monthly data for each denomination in circulation became available,