• No results found

Project Programming and Commissioning as a Risk Mitigation and Threat Analysis Tool

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Project Programming and Commissioning as a Risk Mitigation and Threat Analysis Tool"

Copied!
50
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Project Programming and

Commissioning as a Risk

Mitigation and Threat

Analysis Tool

Presented by

Michael L. Weiss, Ph.D ABD,

HCCP

(2)

PURPOSE OF

COMMISSIONING

Is to confirm through a

systematic process which is

documented and verifiable that

all building systems both hard

and soft will work in compliance

with Owners Performance

(3)

Phases of

Commissioning

Post

Occupancy

Phase

Construction

Phase

Acceptance

Phase

Facility

Program

Pre-design

Phase

Design

Phase

(4)

Pre-911 Commissioning

• Mechanical

• Electrical

• Plumbing

(5)

Changing based on Real World

Conditions

9/11 changed the way we

program, design, build

(6)

COMPLIANCE AND

CERTIFICATION

NIH/NIAID/ July 2004

CFR 42/PART 73/Patriot Act – April 19, 2005

CDC Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical

Laboratories – 5

TH

Edition

NIJ/ASCLD Forensics Laboratories Handbook

American Pathologists Checklist of Accreditation

USDA 242.1 ARS Facilities Design Standards –

Chapter 9

NIH

Guidelines

for Research Involving Recombinant

DNA Molecules

NSF 49

NFPA 30, 45, 55, 70, 101

OSHA

Building Codes

ANSI

ASHRAE

(7)

DISASTER RECOVERY

Uncertainty regarding

the effectiveness of

decontamination

methods

No national clean-up

standards or consensus

Unknown

vulnerabilities and

contamination patterns

Lack of large scale

tests and demos of

decon operations

(8)

Lab

Procedure

Secondary

Containment

Room/Other

Primary

Containment

Room/Equipment

Operations

Maintenance

Equipment

Procedure

Facilities

Operations

MATCHING FACILITIES

AND PROTOCOL

Containment Requirements Facility Requirements Systems Maintenance Access Equipment Maintenance Access

(9)

Commissioning

Process

Ascertain Owner’s

Project Requirements Develop Cx Plan Pre-functional Checklist

Execute Checklist Approve Startup Report

Conduct Functional Performance Tests Approval Final Cx Report Correct Deficiencies Make Corrections Deficiencies? Compliance YES YES NO NO

(10)
(11)

How would (could) you respond ?

QuickTime™ and a

YUV420 codec decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

(12)

PLANNING FOR RESPONSE

Threats

Terrorism

Biological

Chemical

Radiation

Explosive

Naturally Occurring

Pandemics

Emerging Infectious

Diseases

Environmental Disasters

Climate Change

Natural Disasters

•Real, evolving, continuous

worldwide threat

•Effective plan incorporated into

OPR

•Provide solid foundation for

preventing and reacting to

terrorist/emergency incidents

•Predictable, planned and concise

(13)

Risk Analysis and Management in Projects

Risk to

Health and

Safety

Risk to

Environment

Risk to

Activity

COST

Risk to Health and Safety of

People and Protection of Animal

Colonies

Risk to Environment Including Harm and

Damage to Flora and Fauna Due to

Breech of Containment

Risk to Activity Including Damage to

Systems, Equipment, Loss of Research

and Contractual/Construction Delays and

Penalties

The Biggest Challenge of a Project of this Magnitude is

the Execution and Delivery Within Budget

(14)

Project Level

Risks

• Areas of Risk: Health and

safety, environment and

activity

• Directly affect project

budgets

• Risks constantly change

throughout the life of a

project

(15)

Elements of a Threat

Analysis

• Identifies system

vulnerabilities

• Maps system assets

• Assesses threat risk

Threat analysis is most effective when used in

the design intent phase and continues as an

ongoing process throughout the project’s life

(16)

Risk Threat

Analysis Report

Assessment of potential risk areas

includes:

• Operational processes

• Supply and delivery chains

• Communications protocols

• Emergency procedures

(17)

General Security Risk

Assessment

Identify Assets Specify Loss Events Frequency of Events Impact of Events Options to Mitigate Feasibility of Options Cost/Benefit Analysis Decision

Reassessment

(18)

Risk Management

Program

• Offers security and continuity

planning

• Provides practical risk management

• Optimizes emergency response

• Ensures operational continuity

• Lowers risk and liability

The purpose of implementing a risk

mitigation plan is to accurately

identify countermeasures and their

relationship to project and

facility vulnerabilities

(19)

Threat

Risk

(20)

Non standardized quality assurance programs

contribute to duplication of resources, widespread

fragmentation and project confusion. Combined, these

factors are driving up the cost of our projects and the

operational cost on a yearly basis.

(21)

Risk & Secured

Perimeter

(22)

Cost & Secured Perimeter

Cost

Time

Complexity

Space

Project

Consequences

(23)

SECURITY & THREAT MATRIX

2. PARKING CCTV ROADWAY/PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING ROAMING SECURITY 3. VISITOR CENTER

NON-PIGGY BACK DOORS CARD READING DEVICES CCTV @ ALL LOBBIES SECURITY COMMAND CENTER ‘A’

4. BUILDING ENVELOPE / ADMIN.

CARD READING DEVICES HALLWAY CAMERAS

BLAST/PENETRATION RESISTANCE CCTV AT ALL DOORWAYS

SITE LIGHTING WITHIN FENCED AREAS

5. DATA CENTER / CONTROL CENTER

BIOMETRIC READING DEVICES CCTV OF ALL OCCUPIED SPACE

BLAST/PENETRATION PROOF SECURITY COMMAND CENTER ‘B’

1. SITE PERIMETER

PERIMETER DETECTION (CCTV, MOTION DETECTION)

GUARDHOUSES – VEHICULAR IDENTIFICATION SYS. CONTROL GATES

LANDSCAPING - BERMING - GRADING LIMITED SITE LINES

LOW RISK ZONE

HIGH RISK ZONE

MODERATE RISK ZONE

Select Agents Biocontainment ADMINISTRATION PARKING EMPLOYEE BUILDING ENTRY SERVICE PACKAGE INSPECTION EMPLOYEE & VISITOR CENTER ENTRY / EXIT SERVICE & DELIVERY SCREENING ENTRY / EXIT SECURITY FENCE PERIMETER DETECTION PERIMETER DETECTION SECURITY FENCE

1

2

4

5

POWER PLANT

3

LA N DS C AP IN G & G R AD IN G DISPATCHER PARKING

(24)

Risk Management RAMP

Identify Deliverables

Risk Mitigation Plan

Risk Management

Action Item Task

Plan, organize & launch RAMP Establish Baseline

Plan & initiate risk review Identify Tasks

Evaluate Risks Devise Measures Assess Residual Risks

Plan Responses Communicate

Implement Strategy & Plans Control Risks

Assess Outturn Review RAMP Process

(25)

Activity A: Identify deliverables

1. Plan, organize and launch the RAMP process

2. Establish baseline

Activity B: Risk Mitigation Plan

1. Plan and initiate risk review

2. Identify risks

3. Evaluate risks

4. Devise measures for mitigating risks

5. Assess residual risks and decide whether to

continue

6. Plan responses to residual risks

7. Communicate mitigation strategy and response

plan

Activity C: Risk Management

1. Implement strategy and plans

2. Control risks

Activity D: Action item task

1. Assess investment outturn

2. Review RAMP process

(26)

Activity A: Identify deliverables

1. Plan, organize and launch the RAMP process 2. Establish baseline

Activity B: Risk Mitigation Plan 1. Plan and initiate risk review

2. Identify risks 3. Evaluate risks

4. Devise measures for mitigating risks 5. Assess residual risks and decide

whether to continue

6. Plan responses to residual risks 7. Communicate mitigation strategy and

response plan

Activity C: Risk Management 1. Implement strategy and plans

2. Control risks

Activity D: Action item task 1. Assess investment outturn

2. Review RAMP process

•Coordinate Team Members

•Confirm Source of Risk

•Plan Strategy

•Prepare a Brief

•Establish a Baseline

•Document Risk Diary

(27)

Activity A: Identify deliverables 1. Plan, organize and launch the RAMP

process

2. Establish baseline

Activity B: Risk Mitigation Plan 1. Plan and initiate risk review

2. Identify risks 3. Evaluate risks

4. Devise measures for mitigating risks 5. Assess residual risks and decide whether to

continue

6. Plan responses to residual risks

7. Communicate mitigation strategy and response plan

Activity C: Risk Management 1. Implement strategy and plans

2. Control risks

Activity D: Action item task 1. Assess investment outturn

2. Review RAMP process

RAMP Process

•Identify Sources of Risk

•Identify Causes

•Group Like Risks and Cause

•Establish relationships

•Classify Level of Risk

Low

Medium

(28)

Activity A: Identify deliverables 1. Plan, organize and launch the RAMP

process

2. Establish baseline

Activity B: Risk Mitigation Plan 1. Plan and initiate risk review

2. Identify risks 3. Evaluate risks

4. Devise measures for mitigating risks 5. Assess residual risks and decide

whether to continue

6. Plan responses to residual risks 7. Communicate mitigation strategy and

response plan

Activity C: Risk Management 1. Implement strategy and plans

2. Control risks

Activity D: Action item task 1. Assess investment outturn

2. Review RAMP process

RAMP Process

•Develop Risk Mitigation Strategy

•Develop Risk Response Plan

Contain the Risk

Establish Contingency Plan

Establish Contingency Budget

Establish Contingency Schedule

Plan for Potential Impact

(29)

Activity A: Identify deliverables 1. Plan, organize and launch the RAMP

process

2. Establish baseline

Activity B: Risk Mitigation Plan 1. Plan and initiate risk review

2. Identify risks 3. Evaluate risks

4. Devise measures for mitigating risks 5. Assess residual risks and decide

whether to continue

6. Plan responses to residual risks 7. Communicate mitigation strategy and

response plan

Activity C: Risk Management 1. Implement strategy and plans

2. Control risks

Activity D: Action item task 1. Assess investment outturn

2. Review RAMP process

RAMP Process

•Implement Risk Response Plan

•Implement Revised Schedule

•Implement Revised Budget

•Set Review Milestones

(30)

Activity A: Identify deliverables

1. Plan, organize and launch the RAMP process 2. Establish baseline

Activity B: Risk Mitigation Plan 1. Plan and initiate risk review

2. Identify risks 3. Evaluate risks

4. Devise measures for mitigating risks 5. Assess residual risks and decide

whether to continue

6. Plan responses to residual risks 7. Communicate mitigation strategy and

response plan

Activity C: Risk Management 1. Implement strategy and plans

2. Control risks

Activity D: Action item task 1. Assess investment outturn

2. Review RAMP process

RAMP Process for Containment

Pressurization Verification

Architectural

Owner Representative

MEP Engineering

General Contractor

Appropriate Subs

Commissioning

Confirm and Document Pressure Decay

Test Criteria

(31)

Activity A: Identify deliverables 1. Plan, organize and launch the RAMP

process

2. Establish baseline

Activity B: Risk Mitigation Plan 1. Plan and initiate risk review

2. Identify risks 3. Evaluate risks

4. Devise measures for mitigating risks 5. Assess residual risks and decide whether to

continue

6. Plan responses to residual risks

7. Communicate mitigation strategy and response plan

Activity C: Risk Management 1. Implement strategy and plans

2. Control risks

Activity D: Action item task 1. Assess investment outturn

2. Review RAMP process

Design Detail

Electrical Conduit Installation

Autoclave Bio-seal Installation

Embed Detail

Construction Detail

Wire Stripping and Conduit Seal

Mounting Frame and Gasket

Integrity

Embed Installation

Group Like Risks

Mock-up Time

Revised Detailing

Construction Scheduling

Cost

(32)

Activity A: Identify deliverables 1. Plan, organize and launch the RAMP

process

2. Establish baseline

Activity B: Risk Mitigation Plan 1. Plan and initiate risk review

2. Identify risks 3. Evaluate risks

4. Devise measures for mitigating risks 5. Assess residual risks and decide

whether to continue

6. Plan responses to residual risks 7. Communicate mitigation strategy and

response plan

Activity C: Risk Management 1. Implement strategy and plans

2. Control risks

Activity D: Action item task 1. Assess investment outturn

2. Review RAMP process

•Establish Communication Protocol

and Coordination Approval

Benchmark Primary & Alternative Design

Solutions

Develop & Test including Mock-up

Assess Schedule Impact

Establish Contingency Budget

(33)

Activity A: Identify deliverables 1. Plan, organize and launch the RAMP

process

2. Establish baseline

Activity B: Risk Mitigation Plan 1. Plan and initiate risk review

2. Identify risks 3. Evaluate risks

4. Devise measures for mitigating risks 5. Assess residual risks and decide

whether to continue

6. Plan responses to residual risks 7. Communicate mitigation strategy and

response plan

Activity C: Risk Management 1. Implement strategy and plans

2. Control risks

Activity D: Action item task 1. Assess investment outturn

2. Review RAMP process

•Implement Design Solution

•Assign Critical Path Schedule

•Document Lessons Learned

(34)

Program Similarity

Ascertain Owner’s Project Requirements Develop Cx Plan Pre-functional Checklist Execute Checklist

Approve Startup Report

Conduct Functional Performance Tests Approval Final Cx Report Deficiencies? Compliance YES YES NO NO

HARD SYSTEMS

Commissioning

Identify Deliverables

Risk Mitigation Plan

Risk Management

Action Item Task

Plan, organize & launch RAMP

Establish Baseline

Plan & initiate risk review Identify Tasks Evaluate Risks Devise Measures Assess Residual Risks

Plan Responses Communicate

Implement Strategy & Plans Control Risks

Assess Outturn Review RAMP Process

SOFT SYSTEMS

R/T/M

Develop OPR Develop Cx Plan Pre-functional Checklist Execute Checklist

Approve Startup Report

Conduct Functional Performance Tests Approval Final Cx Report Deficiencies? Compliance YES YES NO NO

Plan & initiate risk review Identify Tasks Evaluate Risks Devise Measures Assess Residual Risks

Plan Responses Communicate

Assess Outturn Review RAMP Process

(35)

Early Adoptors

Successful projects:

• Centers for Disease

Control and

Prevention

• US Department of

Energy National

Laboratory Program

• Regional Biological

Defense Program

• NJPHEAL

(36)

New Jersey Public

Health,

Environmental and

Agriculture

Laboratory

Case Study

(37)

Location:

West Trenton, NJ

Gross SF:

200,000

Net SF: 116,000

Efficiency

58%

Construction Budget:

$118,900,000

Current Cost Estimate:

$121,300,000

Phase:

Construction Documents

Completion Date:

Q1 2010

Mid Point Construction:

Q1 2009

(38)

Risk Scoring –

Comparison

Complex Flexible 100 90 Biology Biomedical 80 Computer Science Geology Civil Eng BSL-2

Clean Room Psychology 70 Ballroom BioChemistry Chemistry Clean Room Aerospace 60 B/C cGMP Industrial BSL-3 Elec Eng Mechanical Large Animal No Contain Small Animal No Contain Physics 50 BSL-3E Imaging BSL-3 Clean Room

Small Animal Chem Eng 40 Contain BSL-3Ag Material Nano Large Animal Containment BSL-4 30 20 10 0 Inflexible Simple 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Grea ter Flex ibil ity Less Com plex ity

(39)

Shared 3% Office 17% Amenities 2% BSL-2 34% Environmental Chemistry 20% Animal Facilities 2% BSL-3 6% Waste 1% Support 15%

(40)

General Conditions 12% Contingency 3% Escalation 7% Photo Voltaics 2% Finishes 4%

Doors & Windows 4% Specialties 1% Conveying 1% Plumbing 4% Fire Protection 1%

Equipment & Casework 9% HVAC 17% Electrical 10% Pre Screening Building >1%

Thermal & Moisture 5%

Wood & Plastic 1% Metals 7% Masonry 1% Concrete 3% Site Work 6% Earth Work 1%

Cost by Category

(41)

Where the Big Money is…

Mechanical Systems

Electrical

Structural

Security

Decontamination

Equipment

Casework

Where the Pocket Change

is…

•Architectural

•Lighting

•Finishes

•Doors and Hardware

45-60% of Total

Cost

(42)

HVAC

Temperature

• Humidity

• Pressure

• Directional

Airflow

• Exhaust

• Filtration

•Decontamination

Plumbing

• Effluent Treatment

• Water Supply

• DI/RO Water

• Fire Protection

• Lab Gases

•Breathing Air

Electrical

• Lighting

• Power

– Emergency • Fuel – UPS

• Security Systems

• Telecommunications

Architectural/

Structural

• Blast Protection

• Security

• Progressive

Collapse

• Force Protection

• Protocol

• Durability

• Life Safety

Cost Containment

(43)

Level 1

Full

Redundancy

HVAC

Temperature Control

Humidity Control

Pressure Control

Maintain Directional Airflow

Maintain Exhaust

Maintain Filtration

Decontamination ELECTRICAL

Emergency Lighting

Emergency Power

Maintain Security Systems

No Loss of Telecommunications PLUMBING

Effluent Treatment

Water Supply

DI/RO Water

Fire Protection

Lab Gases

Breathing Air

Level 2

Partial

Redundancy

HVAC

• Limited Temperature Control • Limited Humidity Control • Maintain Pressure

• Maintain Directional Airflow • Limited Exhaust

• Maintain Filtration • Limited Decontamination

ELECTRICAL

• Emergency Lighting • Selected Emergency Power • Maintain Security Systems • No Loss of Telecommunications

PLUMBING

• Limited Effluent Treatment • Water Supply • DI/RO Water • Fire Protection • Lab Gases

Level 3

No Requirement

HVAC • No Temperature Control • No Humidity Control • Limited Pressure Control • No Directional Airflow • Limited Exhaust

• Limited Filtration • No Decontamination

ELECTRICAL

• Emergency Lighting (Life Safety)

• Limited Emergency Power • Maintain Security Systems • No Loss of Telecommunications PLUMBING • No Effluent Treatment • Water Supply • No DI/RO Water • Fire Protection

(44)

Operational Levels

Level 1

N+1- 24/7/365 Operation

< 1 min downtime

Full Temp/Hum/Pressure

Emergency Power

Life Safety/Lighting

Security

Level 2

N - 24/7/365 Operation

< 5 min downtime

Full Pressure Control

Limited Temp/Humidity

Selected Emergency Power

Life Safety/Lighting

Security

Level 3

N - 24/7/365 Operation

< 1 day downtime

No Pressure Control

No Temp/Humidity

Selected Emergency Power

Life Safety/Lighting Operational Status

Space Type NSF Subtotal 1 2 3

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & SENIOR SERVICES I. DHSS

BACTERIOLOGY ADMIN

Clerical Office OFFICE 128 128 Directors Office OFFICE 400 400 Lead Supervisor Office OFFICE 100 100 Program Manager Office OFFICE 150 150 Records Room OFFICE 100 100 Staff Office OFFICE 448 448

1,326 0 0 1326

CLINICAL SERVICES

Clinical Services - BSC Prep Room BSL2 200 200 Clinical Services - Cold Room BSL2 150 150

Clinical Services - Hematology BSL2 300 300 Clinical Services - Microscopy BSL2 150 150 Clinical Services - Oral Fluids BSL2 600 600 Clinical Services - Sample Transfer Area BSL2 50 50 Clinical Services - Urine Testing BSL2 600 600 Special Immunology - BSC Room BSL2 125 125 Special Immunology - Equipment Room BSL2 100 100 Special Immunology - Microscopy BSL2 75 75 Special Immunology Lab BSL2 300 300

Customer Service Unit (non-lab) OFFICE 150 150 Lead Supervisor Office OFFICE 200 200 Program Manager Office OFFICE 150 150 Records Storage- COC OFFICE 150 150 Staff Office OFFICE 384 384

3,684 150 2500 1034

ENTERIC FOOD BORNE

Enteric Lab BSL2 450 450 Equipment Room BSL2 200 200

Food Lab BSL2 450 450 Microscopy BSL2 100 100 Parasitology Lab BSL2 100 100

Specimen Holding (COC) BSL2 100 100

Enteric/Food Office OFFICE 300 300 Enteric/Food Tech OFFICE 50 50 Animal Holding BSL3 BSL3 300 300 2,050 600 1100 350

Evaluat

e

Assig

n

PROGRAM GOALS - REDUNDANCY

(45)

Lower = Less

Cost

Operational

Levels

Level 1

Most

Expensive

Level 2

Mean Level

Status

Level 3

Least

Expensive

Operational Status NSF NSF 1 2 3 PUBLIC HEALTH I. CLINICAL 23,887 13,825 5,382 II. NEWBORN SCREENING

7,609 3,475 1,984 III. BSL3 9,617 342 450 IV. ACCESSIONING 7,950 2,200 3,850 V. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY 25,702 12,450 5,752 VI. SHARED RESOURCES

8,668 600 6,068 VII. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

11,010 1,450 9,460 VIII. OPERATIONS 16,834 850 15,884 111,277 27,255 35,192 48,830 AGRICULTURE I. ANIMAL SCIENCE 12,420 910 7,030 4,480 II. PLANT SCIENCE

5,850 - 3,650 2,200

Total AGRICULTURE 18,270 910 10,680 6,680 SUMMARY

Total NET SQUARE FEET 129,547 28,165 45,872 55,510

Building Efficiency 57% 22% 35% 43%

Total GROSS SQUARE FEET 227,275

4,680 2,150 8,825 1,900 7,500 2,000 100 100

PROGRAM GOALS - REDUNDANCY

(46)

Approach

Baseline

Result

Cost Savings

Reduced Overall

Program

275,000 GSF

157,000 NSF

200,000 GSF

116,000 NSF

$22,000,000

Match Available

Resources

Wish List

Actually

Required

Achieved

Detailed Redundancy

Planning

Entire Facility

N+1

22% N+1

35% N

43% N -1

$7,000,000

Pinpoint Redundancy

Full Redundancy

Actual

Redundancy

Achieved

Reduced BSL-3/3Ag

Requirements Closer to

Mission

BSL-3 Ag

Necropsy

BSL-3 Insectary

20,000 NSF BSL-3

BSL-2 Necropsy

BSL-2 Insectary

10,000 NSF BSL-3

$5,000,000

Avoid Mission Creep

Requested

(47)

New Jersey Public Health,Environmental,

(48)

Conclusion

• Identifies threat and risk profile

vulnerabilities project level

• Identifies countermeasures

• Provides quantitative, prioritized

countermeasures

• Provides verifiable audit trail for all

systems, soft and hard

• Demonstrates effectiveness of systems

and OPR

• Controls specific project costs

• Maintains focus on risk and threat

design aspects

(49)

Project Programming and

Commissioning as a Risk

Mitigation and Threat

Analysis Tool

Presented by

Michael L. Weiss, Ph.D ABD,

HCCP

(50)

Copyright Materials

This presentation is protected by US

and International copyright laws.

Reproduction, distribution, display

and use of the presentation without

written permission of the speaker is

prohibited.

© WorkingBuildings 2007

References

Related documents

These categories and their qualitatively different variations evidence that the course design characteristics, of organisation, activities, facilitation and collaborative

 Engineering students CAN incorporate a global experience in their undergraduate career.  There are multiple programs with flexible options to explore with regard to program

(3) Objectives of the proposed mapping-scheduling algorithm: The algorithm proposed in this paper aims at mapping and scheduling the tasks of a given TCDFD on the hardware

Objectives This cross-sectional study assessed psychological adjustment and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in children and adolescents with congenital or acquired

This study provides evidence that loneliness is strongly associated with depression in older adults and that subjective measures of loneliness and relationship quality are of

Embellished to folding and corner nine patch quilt by appliqueing dresden plate block was like more.. Lanterns for your list item to remove or

All bulk materials for piping systems and structural components shall comply with relevant NORSOK Material Data Sheets. Note that it is the manufacturer's responsibility to confirm

The paper concludes that although some effort has been made by the Cross River State government in gathering and publishing some cultural information in brochures and