• No results found

Using analytics to control and reduce legal spend Ian Nolan CEO, Legalshine SAMPLE INFORMATION ONLY INCLUDED BY WAY OF EXAMPLE

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Using analytics to control and reduce legal spend Ian Nolan CEO, Legalshine SAMPLE INFORMATION ONLY INCLUDED BY WAY OF EXAMPLE"

Copied!
20
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Using analytics to

control and reduce

legal spend

Ian Nolan

CEO, Legalshine

www.legalshinehq.com

(2)
(3)

There is an average budget overrun of

25% on our banking matters with Law

Firm A.

(4)

On this matter, over 80% of the work

was done at partner level, and 92%

(5)

Average cost of our debt recovery

matters is €9,300 – which is 40%

higher than other similar companies

in our industry

(6)

The benefits of technology and analytics

Informs decision making

Consistency across entire organisation

Complete transparency and accountability

Monitor and enforce budgets

Analyse your key metrics

(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)

DRAFT INVOICE

-

211300

LAW FIRM

MATTER

- 211300

CORPORATE

TOTAL

: €26,000

Review emails from Emily & Declan 03-05-14 Mary Hourican 00:10 €415 €69.20 Review

Telcon Declan Hennesy. Review draft letter to Tony O’Malley & email comments to Declan

20-05-14 John Allen 00:40 €415 €276.60 Phone Call Review Email

Telcon Aiden Lee. Email Declan Hogan re banking & trust implications of release of security over 2 Banbridge houses.

25-05-14 Mary Hourican 01:15 €415 €515.00 Phone Call Email

Telcon Declan Hogan. Review draft letter to Aiden Lee & email comments to Derek

20-05-14 Mary Hourican 00:40 €415 €276.60 Phone Call Review Email

Telcon Aiden Lee. Email Declan Hogan re banking & trust implications of release of security over 2 Banbridge houses.

25-05-14 Mary Hourican 01:10 €415 €515.00 Phone Call Email

Drafting Completion Board Minutes 20-05-14 John Allen 06:15 €380 €2,375.00 Drafting

DESCRIPTION DATE TIMEKEEPER HOURS RATE TOTAL Category

INVOICE BREAKDOWN

32%

€26,000

Spend

€80,000

Budget

73% : 17%

ASSOCIATE : PARTNER

1

INCORRECT RATE

1

SIGNIFICANT TIME SPENT

8

BLOCK BILLING

FLAGS

33%

24%

19%

13%

11%

Client Comms

Internal Comms

Drafting

Research

Correspondence

€8,580

€6,240

€4,940

€7,650

€6,800

(11)

DRAFT INVOICE

-

211300

ARTHUR COX

MATTER

- 211300

CORPORATE

TOTAL

: €26,000

Review emails from Emily & Declan 03-05-14 Mary Hourican 00:10 €415 €69.20 Review

Telcon Declan Hennesy. Review draft letter to Tony O’Malley & email comments to Declan

20-05-14 John Allen 00:40 €415 €276.60 Phone Call Review Email

Telcon Aiden Lee. Email Declan Hogan re banking & trust implications of release of security over 2 Banbridge houses.

25-05-14 Mary Hourican 01:15 €415 €515.00 Phone Call Email

Telcon Declan Hogan. Review draft letter to Aiden Lee & email comments to Derek

20-05-14 Mary Hourican 00:40 €415 €276.60 Phone Call Review Email

Telcon Aiden Lee. Email Declan Hogan re banking & trust implications of release of security over 2 Banbridge houses.

25-05-14 Mary Hourican 01:10 €415 €515.00 Phone Call Email

Drafting Completion Board Minutes 20-05-14 John Allen 06:15 €380 €2,375.00 Drafting

DESCRIPTION

DATE TIMEKEEPER HOURS RATE TOTAL

CATEGORY

INVOICE BREAKDOWN

32%

SPEND

€26,000

BUDGET

€80,000

(INCLUDING THIS INVOICE)

CLIENT COMMS €8,580 33%

INTERNAL COMMS €6,240 24%

DRAFTING €4,940 19%

RESEARCH €7,650 13%

CORRESPONDENCE €6,800 11%

73% : 17%

ASSOCIATE : PARTNER

1

INCORRECT RATE

1

EXCESSIVE TIME SPENT

21

BLOCK CILLING

!FLAGS!

Telcon Declan Hennesy. Review

draft letter to Tony O’Malley &

email comments to Declan

20-05-14

John Allen

00:40

€415

€276.60

Flag:

Incorrect Rate

Panel Rate for John Allen

(Associate) should be €380

Drafting Completion Board

Minutes

24-05-14

John Allen

06:15

€380

€2,375.00

6.15 hours drafting

may be excessive

Flag:

Significant Time

DESCRIPTION

DATE TIMEKEEPER HOURS RATE TOTAL CATEGORY

(12)
(13)

TOP ACTIVE MATTERS

€3,420,000

spend this quarter

WIP

€8,116,230

spend year to date

BY LAW FIRM

FIRM BUDGET SPEND

Law Firm 1 €525,000 Law Firm 2 €310,000 Law Firm 3 €110,000 Law Firm 4 €110,700 Law Firm 5 € 24,300

BY DEPARTMENT

DEPARTMENT BUDGET SPEND

Banking €825,000 Insurance €710,000 Lending €310,000 Corporate €210,000 Debt Securities €109,000

BY PANEL

PANEL BUDGET SPEND

Panel 1 €625,000 Panel 3 €410,000 Panel 2 €210,000 Panel 4 €210,000 Panel 5 €103,450

MATTER TYPE LAW FIRM DEPARTMENT BUDGET SPEND

Ireland Investments Ltd.

Litigation Law Firm 1

Client vs Peter Murray

Litigation Law Firm 2

Debt Restructuring – Monkstown

Corporate Law Firm 3

Project Goal

Corporate Law Firm 4

Mary O’Kelly - High Court Proceedings

Litigation Law Firm 5

Banking

Insurance

Lending

Corporate

Debt Securities

€90,000

€120,000

€30,000

€90,000

€95,000

€144,000

€38,000

€34,356

€22,000

€22,000

160%

31%

105%

34%

31%

(14)

TIMEKEEPERS (3):

John Mullen

Mary Smith

Brian Kelly

(Solicitor)

(Partner)

(Associate)

€17,000

€ 6,400

€12,600

Client vs PETER MURRAY

Law Firm

LITIGATION- 3184/00434

BILLED

WIP

48%

SPEND: €36,000

BUDGET: €90,000

STAFFING

TRAINEE

7%

PARTNER

23%

ASSOCIATE

56%

SOLICITOR

14%

Work Breakdown:

Client Comms

Internal Comms

Drafting

Research

32%

29%

24%

15%

€12,000

€8,640

€6,840

€4,680

(15)

LITIGATION

BANKING

PROPERTY

Law Firm

PANEL 1

€34,000

ACTIVE MATTERS

MATTER TYPE DEPARTMENT BUDGET SPEND

Ireland Investments Ltd.

Litigation

Client vs Peter Murray

Litigation

Debt Restructuring - Monkstown

Corporate

Project Goal

Corporate

Banking

Lending

Insurance

Debt Securities

€90,000

€120,000

€30,000

€90,000

€144,000

€38,000

€34,356

€22,000

160%

31%

105%

34%

17 Flags raised

8 Flags actioned

€1,220,230

total spend

CORPORATE

€123,000

total spend

€24,000

av. cost

(

12%

higher than Panel 1 av.)

€114,000

total spend

€293,000

total spend

€18,000

av. cost

(

8%

higher than Panel 1 av.)

€8,000

av. cost

(

2%

higher than Panel 1 av.)

€123,000

total spend

€24,000

av. cost

(

12%

lower than Panel 1 av.)

(16)
(17)

Issue

Budget overrun of 25% on average on Law Firm A

Banking matters.

Recommendations

Seek to cap fees at original budget where work is

within the original agreed scope.

Consider implementing fixed fee budgets in future

Consider consolidating all banking work with Law

(18)
(19)

The benefits of technology and analytics

Informs decision making

Consistency across entire organisation

Complete transparency and accountability

Monitor and enforce budgets

Analyse your key metrics

(20)

Ian Nolan

CEO, Legalshine

www.legalshinehq.com

28-29 Sir John Rogerson’s Quay

Dublin 2

T: 0860731530

References

Related documents

A 3-credit service learning subject entitled “Service Leadership through Serving Children and Families with Special Needs” was developed at The Hong Kong

This article focuses on a set of syntactic phenomena, which have been related to the Null Subject Parameter (NSP) (Chomsky 1981; Rizzi 1982), and that can be found in Chinchano

Approach: In the study, we wish to develop a robust Byzantine Fault-Tolerance Replication (BFTR) technique for peer-to-peer content distribution systems which contains fault

Table 1 continued Years Project title (where available) (reference) Promoters Location Data source Used cell-phone parameters Target traffic estimations Results 2008 2010

The VIKOR method first computes the positive ideal solution and negative ideal solution, and then computes the assessed value of each alternatives using compromise optimization

Weatherization Home Preservation Critical Home Repair • Short-term, exterior work that includes painting, patching, minor repair and landscaping on owner occupied homes..

More precisely, motivated by the current debate surrounding the international accounting standard n°38 (i.e. IAS 38) ‘Intangible Assets’ adoption and its underlying harmonization

Guest Professor: Department of Information & Operations Management, Mays Business School, Texas A&M University (2003-2007).. Department Head: Department of Information