• No results found

Tech Sys Blueprint 3rd Edition

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Tech Sys Blueprint 3rd Edition"

Copied!
7
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

This document is for review purposes only and may not be

duplicated or distributed without written permission. Contact

bburke@iteea.org

for more information.

Interpretation of Columns on EbD™ STEM Course Blueprints

No. Heading Column information

1 STLStandard/ Benchmark

The standard and benchmark addressed from Standards for Technological Literacy (e.g., 1A). The primary source is the appropriate column in the Standards Responsibility Matrix.

2 STLDepth of Coverage

This is a number from 1-4, with 4 representing the greatest depth of coverage, a benchmark that is addressed to sufficient depth that it must be assessed. The primary source is the appropriate column in the Standards Responsibility Matrix. In the instance of additional benchmarks that are not represented in the Standards Responsibility Matrix, authors should indicate the appropriate depth number based upon how the course is written.

3

CCSM Standard, Domain, and Cluster

The Middle School Common Core Standards for Mathematics (CCSM) designation is derived from Common Core Standards for Mathematics (NGA & CCSSO, 2010). It is a combination of numbers and letters (e.g., S-MD.5.) fromthat document.

4 CCSM Depth of Coverage

This is a number from 1-4, with 4 representing the greatest depth of coverage, a benchmark that is addressed to sufficient depth that it must be assessed. Mathematics. Authors should indicate the appropriate depth number based upon how the course is written.

5

CCELA Standard, Domain, Cluster

The Middle School Common Core Standards for English Language Arts (CCSELA) designation is derived from Common Core Standards for English Language Arts (NGA & CCSSO, 2010). It is a combination of numbers and letters (e.g., SL.11-12.1) fromthat document.

6

CCELA Depth of Coverage

This is a number from 1-4, with 4 representing the greatest depth of coverage, a benchmark that is addressed to sufficient depth that it must be assessed.

7 AAAS Standard The combination of Middle Schoolnumbers and letters National Science Standard/Enabling Statement designation is derived from (e.g., 1A) from the Science Standards Matrix. National Science Standards (National Research Council,1996). It will be a

8

AAAS Depth of Coverage

This is a number from 1-4, with 4 representing the greatest depth of coverage, a benchmark that is addressed to sufficient depth that it must be assessed. Mathematics. Authors should indicate the appropriate depth number based upon how the course is written.

9

Unit Titles and Objective Statements

Statements of unit titles and specific objective. Each objective begins with an action verb and makes a complete sentence when combined with the stem: “Students will learn to. . .” (The stem appears once in Column 7.) Outcome behavior in each objective statement is denoted by the verb plus its object.

10 Course Weight Shows the relative importance of each objective and unit. Course weight is used to help determine the percentage of total class time that is spent on each objective.

11 RBTDesignation Classification of outcome behavior in competency and objective statements in Dimensions according to the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. (Cognitive Process Dimension: 1 Remember, 2 Understand, 3 Apply, 4 Analyze, 5 Evaluate, 6 Create) (Knowledge Dimension: A Factual Knowledge, B Conceptual Knowledge, C Procedural Knowledge)

©2012 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association

Technological Systems, Third

(2)

This document is for review purposes only and may not be

duplicated or distributed without written permission. Contact

bburke@iteea.org

for more information.

STEM COURSE BLUEPRINT for:

Technology Systems, Third Edition

Recommended Hours of Instruction:

67 hours + 23 Enrichment

©2012 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association

Technological Systems, Third

(3)

This document is for review purposes only and may not be

duplicated or distributed without written permission. Contact

bburke@iteea.org

for more information.

©2012 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association

Technological Systems, Third

Edition

STL

CCSM

CCSELA

AAAS

STL

Standard/

Benchmark

STL

Depth of

Coverage

CCSM

Standard/

Enabling

Stmt.

CCSM

Depth of Coverage

CCSELA

Standard/ Enabling Stmt.

CCSELA

Depth of Coverage

AAAS

Chapter/ Section/ Grade

AAAS

Depth of Coverage

Unit Titles and Objective Statements

(Students will learn to)

Course

Weight

(Total

=

100%)

RBT

Designation

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

7

9

10

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Unit 1:Technological Systems:

How They Work

15

1F

4

7.EE

4

RST.

6-8.3

4

3A/M3

4

Design a product or system to solve

a problem or help to do things that

could not be done without the help

of technology.

3%

6

2M

3

RST.

6-8.7

4

3B/M3a

4

Interpret input, processes, output

and feedback as related to a

technological system.

3%

3

2N

3

7.G

3

11A/

M2

4

Choose a technological system, and

then report the relationship of its

parts.

2%

2

2O

4

RST.

6-8.1

4

Defend the meaning of an open-loop

system as having no feedback and

requiring human intervention and a

closed-loop system that uses

feedback.

2%

5

2R

4

7.RP1

4

3B/M1

3

Identify requirements that are

placed on the development of a

system.

2%

2

7E

4

7.RP3

3

Illustrate how the design and

construction of structures for service

or convenience have evolved from

the development of techniques for

measurement, controlling systems,

and the understanding of spatial

relationships.

2%

3

10G

2

3C/M2

2

Differentiate invention as a process

of turning ideas and imagination into

devices and systems. Differentiate

innovation as the process of

modifying an existing product or

system to improve it.

1%

4

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Unit 2: Technological Systems:

Issues and Impacts

11

1I

3

1C/M3

2

Illustrate an example of how

marketing and advertising can

create demand of a product.

2%

3

4E

3

8.F5

4

RST.

6-8.9

3

3B/M2a

2

Evaluate the use of different

products and systems then compare

and contrast the desirable and

undesirable consequences.

2%

5

5D

3

RST.

(4)

This document is for review purposes only and may not be

duplicated or distributed without written permission. Contact

bburke@iteea.org

for more information.

©2012 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association

Technological Systems, Third

References

Related documents

This paper describes our experiences using Active Learning in four first-year computer science and industrial engineering courses at the School of Engineering of the Universidad

Results suggest that the probability of under-educated employment is higher among low skilled recent migrants and that the over-education risk is higher among high skilled

Field experiments were conducted at Ebonyi State University Research Farm during 2009 and 2010 farming seasons to evaluate the effect of intercropping maize with

Statistical analysis of expression profiles of colonies that had either been or not been transferred to fresh xylose- containing medium showed that differential expression in a

Such a collegiate cul- ture, like honors cultures everywhere, is best achieved by open and trusting relationships of the students with each other and the instructor, discussions

Aptness of Candidates in the Pool to Serve as Role Models When presented with the candidate role model profiles, nine out of ten student participants found two or more in the pool

The main optimization of antichain-based algorithms [1] for checking language inclusion of automata over finite alphabets is that product states that are subsets of already

They are described more into detail in the following subsections (4.2.4 and 4.2.5).. This lifecycle shall exist at various product life cycle stages, at the level of product