Psychological Injuries - background
Full text
Related documents
He stated that to make a case for “chronic pain” the Worker would have to show that he, “...had ongoing pain that required treatment with medication, that caused ongoing
During the course of treatment, the Worker required psychiatric treatment for issues related to events in her
The Tribunal has jurisdiction to make a determination as to whether the action commenced by G in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia is statute barred pursuant
The Case Worker found that the 10.5% PMI rating awarded by the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, [the “Appeal Board”] in its decision dated June 13, 1986, included a component
Second, the Worker’s representative argues that where (1) hearing loss is sufficient to amount to a permanent medical impairment; and (2) the cause is a combination
The Board Case Manager decided that medical marijuana was not an appropriate treatment with respect to the compensable injury, whereas the Hearing Officer found that the use
I agree with the Board Medical Advisor and the Hearing Officer, that given the Worker’s ability to turn to work, albeit in a limited capacity, and given his Client
There is no evidence that he would have required the child care or would have incurred these expenses, had it not been for his need to attend