• No results found

Enforcement Perspective 2014 High Priority Areas

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Enforcement Perspective 2014 High Priority Areas"

Copied!
14
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

C A R M E N M . O R T I Z

U N I T E D S T A T E S A T T O R N E Y D I S T R I C T O F M A S S A C H U S E T T S

Enforcement Perspective –

2014 High Priority Areas

(2)

IMPORTANCE OF HEALTH CARE FRAUD

INVESTIGATIONS & PROSECUTIONS

 Expected 6.1% growth of health care spending in

2014*

Implementation of ACA

Projected to increase cumulative spending by $621 billion by 2022

Aging baby-boomer population

End of federal government sequester

 Beneficiaries**

Over 50 million enrolled in Medicare

Over 62 million enrolled in Medicaid

(3)

A L L O C A T I O N O F T A X P A Y E R D O L L A R S T O F U N D H E A L T H C A R E

D R I V E S U P C O S T S F O R P A T I E N T S A N D C O N S U M E R S

T H R E A T E N S T H E S T R E N G T H A N D I N T E G R I T Y O F S Y S T E M

E N D A N G E R S P A T I E N T S A F E T Y

HEALTH CARE FRAUD

WHY A DOJ PRIORITY?

(4)

BATTLING HEALTH CARE FRAUD

 DOJ Priority

Consumer Protection Branch

Civil & Criminal Frauds Division

HCF Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (HEAT)

Medicare Fraud Strike Forces

 U.S. Attorney’s Office Priority

Health Care Fraud Unit

Affirmative Litigation Unit

Special Focus Teams

(5)

Nationally Prominent

Cases FY2013 Collections*

 GSK: $1 billion criminal

fine, $2 billion resolution

of civil liabilities (2012)

J&J

Misbranding: $2.2 billion

(2013)

Omnicare: $98 million (2009)

 Pfizer: $2.3 billion (2009)

 Abbott Laboratories: $1.5

billion (2012)

 $3.2 billion collected

from civil enforcement

cases

 $450 million in

criminal fines

*Source: Department of Justice

THE COST OF NON-COMPLIANCE

(6)

NON-MONETARY COSTS

 Damage to reputation

 Effect on sales

 Consequences to consumer confidence

 Impact on business revenue

(7)

“Glaxo Agrees to Pay $3 Billion in

Fraud Settlement” – New York Times

District of Massachusetts: Prominent Cases

GlaxoSmithKline Pfizer

Johnson & Johnson (Omnicare)

Orthofix

At Home VNA

(8)

VALUE OF WHISTLEBLOWERS

 Johnson & Johnson: $167.7 million

 GSK (Cidra): $96 million

 Abbott: $84 million

 Pfizer: $51.5 million

(9)

Omnicare

$98 million

settlement

(2009)

CONSEQUENCES OF

KICKBACKS - OMNICARE

Johnson & Johnson

$149 million settlement (2013)

IVAX Pharmaceuticals

$14 million settlement (2009)

Nursing Homes

nationwide Mariner/Sava Health

Care

$14 million settlement (2010)

$8 million up- front payment conditioned on commitment to

purchase $50 million in drugs Market-share

rebates conditioned on

“active intervention

program”

Below cost consultant pharmacist

services

$50 million for business with assets of only

$3 million

Leonard Grunstein Murray Forman Rubin Schron

(10)

A TOP PRIORITY – HOLDING INDIVIDUALS

CRIMINALLY ACCOUNTABLE: ORTHOFIX

 Thomas Guerreri, former Vice President of Sales

Paying kickbacks to prescribe Orthofix products

 Mitchell Salzman, former Regional Sales Director

False declarations to a grand jury regarding Orthofix’s conduct

 Derrick Field, former Territory Manager

Falsifying patient medical records to induce Medicare to pay for bone

growth stimulators

 Michael McKay, former Territory Manager

Falsifying patient medical records to induce Medicare to pay for bone

growth stimulators

(11)

CIAs: COMPENSATORY MEASURES

 Transparency and accountability:

Clawbacks for executives

Overhaul of compensation programs for sales representatives

Certification of compliance by executives and board members

Transparent research practices

Strong monitoring and reporting provisions

(12)

M A N U F A C T U R I N G O F A D U L T E R A T E D D R U G S ( C O M P O U N D E D D R U G S )

D U R A B L E M E D I C A L E Q U I P M E N T F R A U D H O M E H E A L T H C A R E F R A U D

( P H Y S I C A L , O C C U P A T I O N A L & S P E E C H T H E R A P Y ) M E D I C A L I D T H E F T

Priorities Looking Ahead

(13)

COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS: BEST PRACTICES

 Cooperate with government

Willingness to self-report and take corrective action

 Executives making informed, clear and ethical

decisions

Clear chain of command

 Mandate ongoing training

 Establish ethical compensation plans for sales reps

 Conduct surprise site visits

(14)

E N S U R E E F F E C T I V E N E S S O F L E G I T I M A T E C O M P L I A N C E P R O G R A M S

C O O P E R A T E & C L E A N U P

E X P A N S I O N O F H E A L T H C A R E = E X P A N S I O N O F O V E R S I G H T

Take-aways

References

Related documents

Using a Bollywood and classical Indian dance studio, Naach, as a point of entry, this project draws on two and a half years of ethnographic data collected from April 2014 to

MRI (magnetic in mind the present study was conducted to evaluate the resonance Imaging) and PET (positron emmision prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma by

If our end-user ‡ows forecast changes in the real-time estimates of variable { because they contain information about the future ‡ow of public information concerning {; the ‡ows

The higher the extent of the non-monetary contribution by the venture capitalists, the lower the fraction of shares retained (due to administrative costs) and the higher the price

Unfortunately, since home care aide providers like Griswold Home Care offer personal rather than medical care, most health insurance and Medicare programs do not cover the costs

Please be aware QueensCare Health Centers, by law, must provide the minimum required information and can only release information you have specifically requested and authorized in

In determining the best predictor(s) of net interest margins, partial and full regressions were estimated using net interest margin as the dependent variable and the 4

Intergenic direct duplica- tions might disrupt or fuse genes at breakpoint junctions, but leave one intact gene copy on the duplication allele.. Inverted and inserted duplications