• No results found

(E,E) 4 Hydr­­oxy 3 meth­oxy­benzaldehyde azine

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "(E,E) 4 Hydr­­oxy 3 meth­oxy­benzaldehyde azine"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

organic papers

o3828

Qu and Sun C

16H16N2O4 doi:10.1107/S1600536805032435 Acta Cryst.(2005). E61, o3828–o3830 Acta Crystallographica Section E

Structure Reports Online

ISSN 1600-5368

(

E

,

E

)-4-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde azine

Yang Qua* and Xian-Ming Sunb

aDepartment of Chemistry, Huazhong

Agricul-tural University, Wuhan 430070, People’s Republic of China, andbSchool of Material Science and Technology, Wuhan Institute of Chemical Technology, Wuhan 430073, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Key indicators

Single-crystal X-ray study T= 292 K

Mean(C–C) = 0.002 A˚ Rfactor = 0.042 wRfactor = 0.117

Data-to-parameter ratio = 14.3

For details of how these key indicators were automatically derived from the article, see http://journals.iucr.org/e.

#2005 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain – all rights reserved

The title compound, C16H16N2O4, contains two vanillin aromatic rings, which are bridged by a C N—N C unit. There are two half-molecules in the asymmetric unit; the mid-points of the N—N bonds lie on centres of symmetry. The molecular structure is stabilized by two intramolecular O— H O and intermolecular O—H O and O—H N hydrogen bonds.

Comment

Much work has been devoted to the physicochemical char-acterization of substituted aromatic Schiff bases, because these compounds show remarkable photochromic properties. Photochromism arises from intramolecular H-atom transfer, together with a change in the-electron system. The effect of intermolecular interactions, such as – charge transfer or hydrogen bonding, on H-atom transfer processes has been investigated in the solid state (Hadjoudiset al., 1987; Puranik

et al., 1992).

The hydrogen bond is important in a vast number of chemical, biological and materials systems (Steiner & Saenger, 1993). The weak hydrogen bond of the C—H Xtype (X= O, N and acceptors) has been well established in structural, supramolecular and biological chemistry, and it has been widely used as a tool for the crystal engineering of organic and organometallic solids (Desiraju, 1996; Braga & Grepioni, 2000). In the literature, there are only a few structural reports of Schiff bases derived from vanillin (4-hydroxy-3-methoxy-benzaldehyde) (Kaitner & Pavlovic, 1995; Linet al., 2005).

The crystal structure of the title compound, (I) (Fig. 1), has two half-molecules in the asymmetric unit; the mid-points of the N—N bonds lie on centres of symmetry. The molecules contain two vanillin aromatic rings, which are bridged by C N—N C units. As expected, the non-H atoms are nearly coplanar, forming an extended conjugated system. The mol-ecules crystallize in the (E,E) configuration, with the two 4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl groups trans to each other. This configuration agrees with those commonly found in similar compounds (Glaseret al., 1995; Huniget al., 2000).

(2)

The bond lengths and angles (Table 1) are within the expected ranges (Allenet al., 1987). The molecules are stacked along thebaxis in a parallel fashion (Fig. 2). The centroid-to-centroid and perpendicular distances between the aromatic rings are 4.0886 (9) and 3.503 A˚ , respectively, which may indicate weak – interactions. The molecular structure is stabilized by two intramolecular O—H O and inter-molecular O—H O and O—H N hydrogen bonds (Table 2), which cause the formation of an infinite two-dimensional network by linking the neighbouring molecules in theacplane (Fig. 2).

Experimental

The title compound was prepared by the condensation reaction of vanillin (1.52 g) in ethanol (20 ml) and hydrazine hydrochloride (0.34 g) in ethanol (20 ml). The reaction mixture was refluxed and

stirred for 2 h. The resulting clear solution was kept in air and, after slow evaporation of the solvent over a period of a week, yellow crystals were formed at the bottom of the vessel. The crystals were isolated, washed three times with ethanol and dried in a vacuum desiccator using anhydrous CaCl2(yield 68%). Analysis calculated

for C16H16N2O4: C 63.93, H 5.37, N 9.33%; found: C 63.66, H 5.48, N

9.31%.

Crystal data

C16H16N2O4

Mr= 300.31 Monoclinic,P21=c a= 11.6941 (8) A˚

b= 7.5492 (5) A˚

c= 16.7683 (12) A˚

= 94.169 (1)

V= 1476.41 (18) A˚3

Z= 4

Dx= 1.351 Mg m

3

MoKradiation Cell parameters from 3000

reflections

= 2.0–28.4

= 0.10 mm1

T= 292 (2) K Block, yellow 0.360.330.30 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer

’and!scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)

Tmin= 0.971,Tmax= 0.971

12220 measured reflections

2905 independent reflections 2573 reflections withI> 2(I)

Rint= 0.047 max= 26.0

h=14!14

k=8!9

l=20!20

Refinement

Refinement onF2

R[F2> 2(F2)] = 0.042

wR(F2) = 0.117

S= 1.06 2905 reflections 203 parameters

H-atom parameters constrained

w= 1/[2(F

o2) + (0.0725P)2

+ 0.1651P]

whereP= (Fo2+ 2Fc2)/3

(/)max< 0.001

max= 0.18 e A˚3

min=0.22 e A˚3

Table 1

Selected geometric parameters (A˚ ,).

C2—N1 1.274 (2) C2—C5 1.463 (2) C10—N2 1.2817 (16)

C10—C13 1.4572 (15) N1—N1i

1.413 (2) N2—N2ii

1.4094 (17)

N1—C2—C5 122.71 (14) N2—C10—C13 122.03 (10)

C2—N1—N1i

111.66 (17) C10—N2—N2ii 112.95 (11)

N1—C2—C5—C6 175.98 (14) N1—C2—C5—C4 2.7 (2) O1—C3—C8—O2 0.65 (18) C4—C3—C8—O2 178.27 (12) O1—C3—C8—C7 178.43 (12) O3—C11—C12—C13 177.08 (11)

N2—C10—C13—C14 167.39 (11) N2—C10—C13—C12 9.42 (18) O3—C11—C16—O4 4.44 (17) C12—C11—C16—O4 175.05 (11) C5—C2—N1—N1i 178.95 (13) C13—C10—N2—N2ii

179.90 (11)

[image:2.610.45.296.70.245.2]

Symmetry codes: (i)xþ2;yþ2;zþ1; (ii)xþ1;y;zþ1.

Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (A˚ ,).

D—H A D—H H A D A D—H A

O2—H2A O1 0.82 2.22 2.6658 (14) 114 O4—H4A O3 0.82 2.24 2.6731 (12) 114 O2—H2A O4iii 0.82 2.34 2.9973 (14) 138 O4—H4A N2iv

0.82 2.05 2.8346 (12) 159

Symmetry codes: (iii)xþ1;y1 2;zþ

1

2; (iv)xþ1;yþ 1 2;zþ

1 2.

organic papers

Acta Cryst.(2005). E61, o3828–o3830 Qu and Sun C

16H16N2O4

o3829

Figure 2

[image:2.610.45.296.297.498.2]

A packing diagram of (I); O—H O and N—H O hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.

Figure 1

[image:2.610.313.567.661.715.2]
(3)

Hydroxy H atoms were located in a difference map, while the remaining H atoms were positioned geometrically [0.82 (OH), 0.93 (CH) and 0.96 A˚ (CH3)] and constrained to ride on their parent

atoms with Uiso(H) values of 1.2 (1.5 for methyl and hydroxy H

atoms) timesUeq(C,O).

Data collection:SMART(Siemens, 1996); cell refinement:SAINT

(Siemens, 1996); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure:SHELXS97(Sheldrick, 1997a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a); molecular graphics:

SHELXTL(Sheldrick, 1997b); software used to prepare material for publication:SHELXTL.

Financial support from the Bureau of Science and Tech-nology of Wuhan City, Hubei Province, People’s Republic of China, through research grant No. 20055003059-28 is grate-fully acknowledged.

References

Allen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L. & Orpen, A. G. (1987).

J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. S1–19.

Braga, D. & Grepioni, F. (2000).Acc. Chem. Res.33, 601–608. Desiraju, G. R. (1996).Acc. Chem. Res.29, 441–449.

Glaser, R., Chen, G. S., Anthamatten, M. & Barnes, C. L. (1995).J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 1449–1458.

Hadjoudis, E., Vittorakis, M. & Moustakali-Mavridis, I. (1987).Tetrahedron,

43, 1345–1360.

Hunig, S., Kemmer, M., Wenner, H., Barbosa, F., Gescheidt, G., Perepichka, I. F., Bauerle, P., Emge, A. & Peters, K. (2000).Chem. Eur. J.6, 2618–2632. Kaitner, B. & Pavlovic, G. (1995).Acta Cryst.C51, 1875–1878.

Lin, Z.-D., Lin, Z.-D., Li, X. & Huang Y.-M. (2005).Acta Cryst.E61, o3032– o3033.

Puranik, V. G., Tavale, S. S., Kumbhar, A. S., Yerande, R. G., Padhye, S. B. & Butcher, R. J. (1992).J. Crystallogr. Spectrosc. Res.22, 725–731.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1996).SADABS. University of Go¨ttingen, Germany. Sheldrick, G. M. (1997a). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of

Go¨ttingen, Germany.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1997b).SHELXTL. Version 5.1. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Siemens (1996).SMARTandSAINT. Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Steiner, T. & Saenger, W. (1993).J. Am. Chem. Soc.115, 4540–4547.

organic papers

o3830

Qu and Sun C

(4)

supporting information

sup-1 Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o3828–o3830

supporting information

Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o3828–o3830 [https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536805032435]

(

E

,

E

)-4-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde azine

Yang Qu and Xian-Ming Sun

(E,E)-4-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde azine

Crystal data

C16H16N2O4

Mr = 300.31

Monoclinic, P21/c

Hall symbol: -P 2ybc

a = 11.6941 (8) Å

b = 7.5492 (5) Å

c = 16.7683 (12) Å

β = 94.169 (1)°

V = 1476.41 (18) Å3

Z = 4

F(000) = 632

Dx = 1.351 Mg m−3

Mo radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å Cell parameters from 3000 reflections

θ = 2.0–28.4°

µ = 0.10 mm−1

T = 292 K Block, yellow

0.36 × 0.33 × 0.30 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer

Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Graphite monochromator

φ and ω scans

Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)

Tmin = 0.971, Tmax = 0.971

12220 measured reflections 2905 independent reflections 2573 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

Rint = 0.047

θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 1.8°

h = −14→14

k = −8→9

l = −20→20

Refinement

Refinement on F2

Least-squares matrix: full

R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042

wR(F2) = 0.117

S = 1.06 2905 reflections 203 parameters 0 restraints

Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods

Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map

Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites

H-atom parameters constrained

w = 1/[σ2(F

o2) + (0.0725P)2 + 0.1651P]

where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

(Δ/σ)max < 0.001

Δρmax = 0.18 e Å−3

Δρmin = −0.22 e Å−3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full

(5)

supporting information

sup-2 Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o3828–o3830

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2,

conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used

only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2

are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq

C1 0.66795 (19) 0.4278 (3) 0.49558 (14) 0.0873 (7) C2 1.01028 (13) 0.83209 (19) 0.43616 (9) 0.0538 (4) C3 0.83179 (11) 0.41874 (18) 0.42008 (8) 0.0439 (3) C4 0.87042 (12) 0.58421 (18) 0.44377 (8) 0.0462 (3) C5 0.96476 (12) 0.65944 (18) 0.40990 (8) 0.0473 (3) C6 1.01723 (12) 0.5664 (2) 0.35152 (9) 0.0552 (4) C7 0.97863 (12) 0.3992 (2) 0.32810 (9) 0.0551 (4) C8 0.88803 (11) 0.32391 (18) 0.36279 (8) 0.0443 (3) C9 0.65566 (12) 0.2693 (2) 0.20614 (10) 0.0582 (4) C10 0.40458 (10) 0.10424 (15) 0.43595 (6) 0.0343 (3) C11 0.45800 (10) 0.26816 (15) 0.23087 (7) 0.0331 (3) C12 0.47801 (10) 0.20697 (15) 0.30823 (7) 0.0352 (3) C13 0.38654 (10) 0.18237 (15) 0.35657 (6) 0.0339 (3) C14 0.27598 (11) 0.22508 (17) 0.32687 (7) 0.0386 (3) C15 0.25633 (10) 0.29107 (18) 0.24966 (7) 0.0399 (3) C16 0.34615 (10) 0.31513 (15) 0.20202 (6) 0.0336 (3) N1 0.96999 (11) 0.91975 (16) 0.49266 (8) 0.0580 (3) N2 0.50030 (8) 0.03368 (13) 0.46082 (5) 0.0325 (2) O1 0.74100 (9) 0.33069 (14) 0.44868 (7) 0.0609 (3) O2 0.85337 (9) 0.15802 (13) 0.33983 (6) 0.0547 (3) O3 0.53890 (7) 0.29012 (13) 0.17738 (5) 0.0438 (3) O4 0.32559 (7) 0.38795 (13) 0.12836 (5) 0.0428 (2)

H1A 0.7097 0.4649 0.5441 0.131*

H1B 0.6046 0.3547 0.5082 0.131*

H1C 0.6397 0.5301 0.4663 0.131*

H2 1.0711 0.8798 0.4105 0.065*

H4 0.8336 0.6461 0.4824 0.055*

H6 1.0790 0.6165 0.3277 0.066*

H7 1.0144 0.3381 0.2887 0.066*

H9A 0.6722 0.3457 0.2513 0.087*

H9B 0.7044 0.2996 0.1646 0.087*

H9C 0.6692 0.1485 0.2220 0.087*

H10 0.3448 0.1056 0.4696 0.041*

H12 0.5525 0.1820 0.3283 0.042*

H14 0.2149 0.2095 0.3587 0.046*

H15 0.1821 0.3191 0.2301 0.048*

H2A 0.8045 0.1231 0.3688 0.082*

(6)

supporting information

sup-3 Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o3828–o3830

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23

C1 0.0878 (13) 0.0708 (12) 0.1098 (15) −0.0253 (10) 0.0523 (12) −0.0298 (11) C2 0.0531 (8) 0.0446 (8) 0.0615 (9) −0.0081 (6) −0.0107 (7) 0.0093 (7) C3 0.0424 (7) 0.0409 (7) 0.0478 (7) −0.0009 (5) −0.0012 (5) 0.0008 (5) C4 0.0495 (7) 0.0404 (7) 0.0480 (7) 0.0011 (6) −0.0016 (6) −0.0013 (5) C5 0.0455 (7) 0.0431 (7) 0.0513 (7) −0.0022 (6) −0.0109 (6) 0.0067 (6) C6 0.0435 (7) 0.0626 (9) 0.0590 (8) −0.0080 (7) 0.0011 (6) 0.0040 (7) C7 0.0455 (7) 0.0632 (10) 0.0568 (8) 0.0008 (7) 0.0048 (6) −0.0095 (7) C8 0.0406 (7) 0.0438 (7) 0.0469 (7) 0.0021 (5) −0.0076 (5) −0.0046 (5) C9 0.0384 (7) 0.0679 (10) 0.0699 (9) 0.0125 (6) 0.0145 (6) 0.0301 (8) C10 0.0412 (6) 0.0356 (6) 0.0264 (5) 0.0017 (5) 0.0045 (4) −0.0004 (4) C11 0.0369 (6) 0.0313 (6) 0.0314 (6) 0.0003 (4) 0.0048 (4) 0.0032 (4) C12 0.0354 (6) 0.0361 (6) 0.0336 (6) 0.0032 (5) −0.0008 (4) 0.0058 (5) C13 0.0420 (6) 0.0326 (6) 0.0268 (5) 0.0019 (5) 0.0016 (4) 0.0017 (4) C14 0.0376 (6) 0.0448 (7) 0.0339 (6) 0.0018 (5) 0.0070 (5) 0.0053 (5) C15 0.0329 (6) 0.0491 (7) 0.0372 (6) 0.0014 (5) −0.0009 (5) 0.0078 (5) C16 0.0392 (6) 0.0336 (6) 0.0273 (5) −0.0019 (5) −0.0014 (4) 0.0026 (4) N1 0.0654 (8) 0.0400 (7) 0.0660 (8) −0.0120 (6) −0.0128 (6) 0.0057 (6) N2 0.0418 (5) 0.0339 (5) 0.0219 (4) −0.0005 (4) 0.0022 (4) 0.0016 (4) O1 0.0619 (7) 0.0456 (6) 0.0776 (7) −0.0115 (5) 0.0215 (5) −0.0125 (5) O2 0.0545 (6) 0.0477 (6) 0.0615 (6) −0.0030 (5) 0.0016 (5) −0.0143 (5) O3 0.0390 (5) 0.0543 (6) 0.0389 (5) 0.0064 (4) 0.0094 (4) 0.0160 (4) O4 0.0389 (4) 0.0588 (6) 0.0301 (4) −0.0043 (4) −0.0022 (3) 0.0128 (4)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

C1—O1 1.408 (2) C9—H9B 0.9600

C1—H1A 0.9600 C9—H9C 0.9600

C1—H1B 0.9600 C10—N2 1.2817 (16)

C1—H1C 0.9600 C10—C13 1.4572 (15)

C2—N1 1.274 (2) C10—H10 0.9300

C2—C5 1.463 (2) C11—O3 1.3602 (14)

C2—H2 0.9300 C11—C12 1.3808 (16)

C3—O1 1.3686 (16) C11—C16 1.4066 (17)

C3—C4 1.3771 (19) C12—C13 1.4006 (16)

C3—C8 1.3999 (19) C12—H12 0.9300

C4—C5 1.398 (2) C13—C14 1.3892 (17)

C4—H4 0.9300 C14—C15 1.3906 (17)

C5—C6 1.384 (2) C14—H14 0.9300

C6—C7 1.388 (2) C15—C16 1.3771 (17)

C6—H6 0.9300 C15—H15 0.9300

C7—C8 1.369 (2) C16—O4 1.3573 (13)

C7—H7 0.9300 N1—N1i 1.413 (2)

C8—O2 1.3631 (16) N2—N2ii 1.4094 (17)

C9—O3 1.4233 (16) O2—H2A 0.8200

(7)

supporting information

sup-4 Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o3828–o3830

O1—C1—H1A 109.5 O3—C9—H9C 109.5

O1—C1—H1B 109.5 H9A—C9—H9C 109.5

H1A—C1—H1B 109.5 H9B—C9—H9C 109.5

O1—C1—H1C 109.5 N2—C10—C13 122.03 (10)

H1A—C1—H1C 109.5 N2—C10—H10 119.0

H1B—C1—H1C 109.5 C13—C10—H10 119.0

N1—C2—C5 122.71 (14) O3—C11—C12 125.57 (11)

N1—C2—H2 118.6 O3—C11—C16 114.60 (10)

C5—C2—H2 118.6 C12—C11—C16 119.82 (11)

O1—C3—C4 125.88 (13) C11—C12—C13 120.24 (11) O1—C3—C8 114.03 (12) C11—C12—H12 119.9 C4—C3—C8 120.08 (13) C13—C12—H12 119.9 C3—C4—C5 120.23 (13) C14—C13—C12 119.46 (10)

C3—C4—H4 119.9 C14—C13—C10 119.38 (10)

C5—C4—H4 119.9 C12—C13—C10 121.09 (10)

C6—C5—C4 119.02 (13) C13—C14—C15 120.22 (11) C6—C5—C2 119.63 (14) C13—C14—H14 119.9 C4—C5—C2 121.34 (14) C15—C14—H14 119.9 C5—C6—C7 120.65 (14) C16—C15—C14 120.40 (11)

C5—C6—H6 119.7 C16—C15—H15 119.8

C7—C6—H6 119.7 C14—C15—H15 119.8

C8—C7—C6 120.24 (14) O4—C16—C15 119.28 (10)

C8—C7—H7 119.9 O4—C16—C11 120.93 (10)

C6—C7—H7 119.9 C15—C16—C11 119.77 (10)

O2—C8—C7 119.01 (12) C2—N1—N1i 111.66 (17)

O2—C8—C3 121.26 (12) C10—N2—N2ii 112.95 (11)

C7—C8—C3 119.73 (13) C3—O1—C1 117.41 (12)

O3—C9—H9A 109.5 C8—O2—H2A 109.5

O3—C9—H9B 109.5 C11—O3—C9 117.33 (10)

H9A—C9—H9B 109.5 C16—O4—H4A 109.5

O1—C3—C4—C5 179.79 (13) C11—C12—C13—C10 174.88 (11) C8—C3—C4—C5 1.0 (2) N2—C10—C13—C14 167.39 (11) C3—C4—C5—C6 1.0 (2) N2—C10—C13—C12 −9.42 (18) C3—C4—C5—C2 −177.64 (12) C12—C13—C14—C15 0.24 (19) N1—C2—C5—C6 −175.98 (14) C10—C13—C14—C15 −176.62 (11) N1—C2—C5—C4 2.7 (2) C13—C14—C15—C16 −0.2 (2) C4—C5—C6—C7 −1.5 (2) C14—C15—C16—O4 −176.74 (12) C2—C5—C6—C7 177.24 (13) C14—C15—C16—C11 1.73 (19) C5—C6—C7—C8 −0.2 (2) O3—C11—C16—O4 −4.44 (17) C6—C7—C8—O2 −178.67 (13) C12—C11—C16—O4 175.05 (11) C6—C7—C8—C3 2.2 (2) O3—C11—C16—C15 177.12 (11) O1—C3—C8—O2 −0.65 (18) C12—C11—C16—C15 −3.40 (18) C4—C3—C8—O2 178.27 (12) C5—C2—N1—N1i 178.95 (13)

O1—C3—C8—C7 178.43 (12) C13—C10—N2—N2ii 179.90 (11)

(8)

supporting information

sup-5 Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o3828–o3830

C16—C11—C12—C13 3.49 (18) C12—C11—O3—C9 −8.17 (19) C11—C12—C13—C14 −1.93 (18) C16—C11—O3—C9 171.28 (12)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+2, −y+2, −z+1; (ii) −x+1, −y, −z+1.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A

O2—H2A···O1 0.82 2.22 2.6658 (14) 114 O4—H4A···O3 0.82 2.24 2.6731 (12) 114 O2—H2A···O4iii 0.82 2.34 2.9973 (14) 138

O4—H4A···N2iv 0.82 2.05 2.8346 (12) 159

Figure

Figure 1A drawing of (I), with the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement(left-hand molecule); 1ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level

References

Related documents

The first EKC estimation study for CO 2 emissions using time series data was carried out.. by Roca

Outputs on the ‘Move Description’ subset of data from our final model were judged by hu- mans to be as good as human written ground truth commentaries on measures of fluency

The objective of this research is to empirically examine if both credit and business cycle affect the ex-post credit risk (i.e. non-performing loans) in the banking system of

We show that a layer-wise pretraining scheme for recur- rent attention models gives over 1% BLEU improvement absolute and it allows to train deeper recurrent encoder

In this paper, we tackle the task of economic event detection by means of a supervised machine learning approach, which we expect will be able to detect a wider variety

Chinese grammatical error diagnosis task has been developed for a long time. From the initial statisti- cal methods to the current machine learning, more and more attention has

In this study, we presented a novel encoder-decoder model to automatically generate market comments from numerical time-series data of stock prices, using the Nikkei Stock Average as

However, unlike them, we do not employ any Gold Standard (annotated by experts) for training the annotators and instead we propose a self-training strategy to select a set