Int. J.IndustrialMathematisVol. 2,No. 4(2010)279-293
Fuzzy Laplae Transform on Two Order
Derivative and Solving Fuzzy Two Order
Dierential Equations
S.J.RamazanniaTolouti
,M.BarkhordariAhmadi
Department ofMathematis,BandarAbbasBranh, IslamiAzadUniversity,Bandar Abbas,Iran
Reeived3July2010;revised 30November 2010;aepted11Deember2010.
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||-Abstrat
In this paper, the laplae transform formula on the fuzzy two order derivative is
inves-tigated by using the strongly generalized dierentiability onept. Then, it is used in a
analytimethodforfuzzytwoorderdierentialequation. Therelatedtheoremsand
prop-erties areproved indetail and themethodis illustratedbysolvingsome examples.
Keywords : Fuzzy-number, Fuzzy-valued funtion, Generalized dierentiability, fuzzy dierential
equation,fuzzylaplaetransform,fuzzyinitialvalueproblem.
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||{
1 Introdution
A natural way to model dynamisystems under unortaintyis to use FDEs. Two order
fuzzy dierential equations are one of the simplest FDEs whih may appear in many
appliations. The topi of fuzzy dierential equations (FDEs) has been rapidly growing
in reent years. The onept of the fuzzy derivative was rst introdued by Chang and
Zadeh[22 ℄; itwasfollowedupbyDuboisandPrade[27 ℄,whousedtheextensionpriniple
in their approah. Other methods have been disussed by Puri and Ralesu [44 ℄ and
Goetshel and Voxman [30 ℄. Kandel and Byatt [37 , 38 ℄ applied the onept of FDEs
to the analysis of fuzzy dynamial problems. The FDE and the initial value problem
(Cauhy problem) were rigorously treated by Kaleva [35 , 36 ℄, Seikkala [45 ℄, He and Yi
[40 ℄, Kloeden [39℄ and Menda [42 ℄, and by other researhers (see [10 , 15 , 17 , 16 , 20 ,
26 , 34 ℄). The numerial methods for solving fuzzy dierential equations are introdued
in [1 , 2, 7 , 32℄. A thorough theoretial researh of fuzzy Cauhy problems was given by
Kaleva[35 ℄,Seikkala[45 ℄,OuyangandWu[40 ℄,andKloeden[39 ℄andWu[48 ℄. Kaleva[35 ℄
disussedthepropertiesofdierentiablefuzzyset-valuedfuntionsbymeansoftheonept
of H-dierentiability due to Puri and Ralesu [44 ℄, gave the existene and uniqueness
theorem for a solutionof the fuzzy dierentialequation y 0
=f(t;y); y(t
0 ) =y
0
when f
satises theLipshitz ondition. Further, song and Wu [46 ℄ investigate fuzzy dierential
equations, and generalizethemain resultsofKaleva[35℄. Seikkala[45 ℄, denedthefuzzy
derivativewhihisthegeneralizationofHukuharaderivative,andshowedthatfuzzyinitial
value problem y 0
= f(t;y); y(t
0 ) =y
0
hasa unique solution, for the fuzzy proess of a
real variable whose values are in the fuzzy number spae (E, D), where f satises the
generalized Lipshitz ondition. Strongly generalized dierentiability was introdued in
[12 ℄ and studied in [10℄. The strongly generalized derivative is dened for a larger lass
of fuzzy-valued funtionthan the H-derivative,and fuzzy dierentialequations an have
solutionswhihhave a dereasinglengthof theirsupport. So weuse thisdierentiability
onept in the present paper. The fuzzy Laplae transform method solves FTDEs and
orresponding fuzzy two order and boundary value problems. In this way fuzzy Laplae
transformsreduetheproblemofsolvingaFTDEtoanalgebraiproblem. Thisswithing
from operations of alulus to algebrai operations on transforms is alled operational
alulus, a very important area of applied mathematis, and for the engineer, thefuzzy
Laplae transform method is pratially the most important operational method. The
fuzzyLaplaetransformalso hastheadvantagethatitsolvesproblemsdiretly,fuzzytwo
order value problemswithoutrst determininga generalsolution, and non homogeneous
dierentialequationswithoutrst solvingtheorrespondinghomogeneous equation.
The paperisorganized asfollows:
Setion2 ontains thebasimaterial to be usedin thepaper. Insetion 3 fuzzy Laplae
transform for two order derivative is dened and Proedure for solving FDEs by fuzzy
Laplae transform is proposed. Several examples are given in setion 4, and onlusions
aredrawninsetion 5.
2 Preliminaries
We now reall some denitions needed through the paper. The basi denitionof fuzzy
numbersisgiven in[25 , 31 ℄.
By R ,we denotethe setof all real numbers. A fuzzy numberisa mappingu: R![0;1℄
withthe followingproperties:
(a)u is uppersemi-ontinuous,
(b)u is fuzzyonvex, i.e., u(x+(1 )y)minfu(x);u(y)g forall x;y2R ;2[0;1℄,
()u is normal,i.e.,9x
0
2R forwhih u(x
0 )=1,
(d) supp u = fx 2 R j u(x) > 0g is the support of the u, and its losure l(supp u) is
ompat.
Let E be the set of all fuzzy number on R . The r-level set of a fuzzy number u 2 E,
or1, denotedby[u℄
r
, isdened as
[u℄
r =
fx2Rj u(x)rg if 0r1
l(suppu) if r=0
Itislearthatther-levelsetofafuzzynumberisalosedandboundedinterval[u(r);u (r)℄,
whereu(r)denotestheleft-handendpointof[u℄
r
andu(r)denotestheright-handendpoint
e y(t)=
1 if t=y
o if t6=y
R an be embeddedinE.
Remark 2.1. (See[52 ℄) Let X beCartesianprodut of universesX =X
1
:::X
n , and
A
1 ;:::;A
n
be n fuzzy numbers in X
1
;:::;X
n
, respetively. f is a mapping from X to a
universe Y, y=f(x
1 ;:::;x
n
). Thenthe extension priniple allows us to denea fuzzy set
B in Y by
B =f(y;u(y))jy=f(x
1 ;:::;x
n );(x
1 ;:::;x
n )2Xg
where
u
B (y)=
(
sup
(x1;:::;xn)2f 1
(y) minfu
A
1 (x
1 );:::;u
A
n (x
n
))g; if f 1
(y)6=0;
0 if otherwise:
wheref 1
isthe inverse of f.
For n=1, the extension priniple, of ourse, redues to
B =f(y;u
B
(y))jy =f(x);x2Xg
where
u
B (y)=
(
sup
x2f 1
(y) u
A
(x); if f 1
(y)6=0;
0 if otherwise:
Aording to Zadeh ;
s extensionpriniple,operation ofaddition onE isdened by
(uv)(x)=sup
y2R
minfu(y);v(x y)g; x2R
and salarmultipliationof a fuzzynumberisgiven by
(ku)(x)= (
u(x=k); k >0;
e
0 ; k=0;
where ~
02E:
It iswellknownthat thefollowingproperties aretrue forall levels
[uv℄
r =[u℄
r +[v℄
r
; [ku℄
r =k[u℄
r
From thisharateristi of fuzzy numbers, we see that a fuzzy numberis determined by
theendpointsoftheintervals[u℄
r
. Thisleadstothefollowingharateristirepresentation
of afuzzy numberintermsof thetwo "endpoint" funtionsu (r)and u(r). An equivalent
parametri denitionisalso given in([29, 41 ℄) as:
Denition 2.1. A fuzzy number u in parametri form is a pair (u ;u) of funtions u(r),
u(r); 0r 1, whih satisfy the following requirements:
ontin-2. u(r) is abounded non-inreasingleft ontinuous funtion in (0;1℄, andright
ontin-uousat 0,
3. u(r)u(r); 0r1.
A rispnumberissimplyrepresentedbyu(r)=u(r)=; 0r 1:Wereall that
for a< b < whih a;b; 2 R , the triangular fuzzy numberu =(a;b;) determined by
a;b; is given suh that u(r) =a+(b a)r and u(r)= ( b)r arethe endpoints of
ther-levelsets, forall r2[0;1℄.
For arbitrary u=(u(r);u (r)), v =(v(r);v(r)) and k >0 we deneaddition uv ,
sub-tration u v and saler multipliationbyk as(See[29 , 41 ℄)
(a)Addition:
uv=(u(r)+v(r);u (r)+v(r))
(b)Subtration:
u v=(u(r) v(r);u (r) v(r))
()Multipliation:
uv=(minfu (r)v(r);u (r)v(r);u(r)v(r);u (r)v(r)g;maxfu(r)v(r);u (r)v(r);u (r)v(r);u(r)v(r)g)
(d)Salermultipliation:
ku= (
(ku;ku ); k 0;
(ku;ku ); k <0:
The Hausdordistane betweenfuzzy numbersgiven by D:EE !R
+ S
0,
D(u;v)= sup
r2[0;1℄
maxfju (r) v(r)j;ju(r) v(r)jg;
where u=(u (r);u(r)), v =(v(r);v(r))R is utilized (See [12 ℄). Then, it is easy to see
thatD isa metriinE andhas thefollowingproperties (See[43 ℄)
(i)D(uw;vw)=D(u;v), 8u;v;w2E,
(ii)D(ku;kv)=jkjD(u;v), 8k2R ;u;v2E,
(iii)D(uv;we)D(u;w)+D(v;e), 8u;v;w;e2E,
(iV)(D;E) isa ompletemetrispae.
Theorem 2.1. (See [8 ℄) (i) If we dene e
0 =
0 , then
e
0 2 E is a neutral element with
respet to addition, i.e. u e
0= e
0u=u, for all u2E.
(ii) With respet to e
0, none of u2EnR ,has opposite in E.
(iii) For any a;b 2 R with a;b 0 or a;b 0 and any u 2 E, we have (a+b)u =
aubu; for the general a;b2R ,the above property does not neessarily hold.
(iv) For any 2R andany u;v 2E, we have (uv)=uv;
(v) For any ;2R and any u2E, we have (u)=(:)u;
It is well-known that the H-derivative (dierentiability in the sense of Hukuhara)for
fuzzy mappingswasinitiallyintroduedbyPuri and Ralesu([44 ℄)and it isbased on the
H-dierene of sets,asfollows.
Denition 2.3. Let x;y 2E. If thereexists z2E suh that x=yz, then z is alled
the H-diereneof x andy, and it is denoted by x h
y.
Inthispaper,thesign" h
"alwaysstandsforH-dierene,andalsonotethatx h
y6=
x y.
In thispaperwe onsiderthe followingdenitionwhihwasintroduedby Bedeand Gal
in([12, 13 ℄).
Denition 2.4. Let f : (a;b)!E and x
0
2(a;b). We say that f isstrongly generalized
dierential atx
0
(Bede-Gal dierential). If thereexists an element f 0
(x
0
)2E, suh that
(i) for all h>0 suÆientlysmall,
9f(x
0
+h) f(x
0
); 9f(x
0
) f(x
0 h)
and the limits(in the metriD)
lim
h&0 f(x
0
+h) f(x
0 ) h = lim h&0 f(x 0
) f(x
0 h) h =f 0 (x 0 ) or
(ii) for all h>0 suÆientlysmall,
9f(x
0
) f(x
0
+h); 9f(x
0
h) f(x
0 )
and the limits(in the metriD)
lim h&0 f(x 0 ) f(x 0 +h) h = lim h&0 f(x 0
h) f(x
0 ) h =f 0 (x 0 ) or
(iii) for all h>0 suÆientlysmall,
9f(x
0
+h) f(x
0
); 9f(x
0
h) f(x
0 )
and the limits(in the metriD)
lim
h&0 f(x
0
+h) f(x
0 ) h = lim h&0 f(x 0
h) f(x
0 ) h =f 0 (x 0 ) or
(iv) for all h>0 suÆientlysmall,
9f(x
0
) f(x
0
+h); 9f(x
0
) f(x
0 h)
and the limits(in the metriD)
lim f(x 0 ) f(x 0 +h) = lim f(x 0
) f(x
(h and h atdenominators mean 1
h and
1
h
, respetively)
Theorem2.2. (Seee.g. [21 ℄) Lety:[0;a℄R !R beontinuousandf :[0;a℄E !
E, be the Zadeh s extension of y, i.e., [f(t;x)℄
r
= f(t;[x℄
r
). If y is non-inreasing with
respettothe seondargument,usingthe derivativeinDenition(2.4), ase (ii),the fuzzy
solution of
y 0
=f(t;y); y(t
0 )=y
0
whenever it exists, oinides withthe solution obtained via dierential inlusions.
Remark 2.2. These ase (iii) and (iv) introdued in [12 ℄, in order to ensure a
dieren-tiable swith the ase (i) and ase (ii) in Denition (2.4). Of ourse, as the authors in
[12 ℄and in [21 ℄havestated, the ases (i) and (ii)in Denition (2.4), aremoreimportant
sinease (iii) and (iv) in Denition (2.4) our only on a disrete set of points. As an
example supporting these omments, let us onsider 2EnRbe any fuzzy(non-real)
on-stant and let f :[0;a℄E !E, f(t)=ost; t2[0;a℄. It is natural toexpet that f
isdierentiableeverywherein itsdomain. Let usobserve thatf isdierentiable aording
to Denition (2.4) (ii), on eah sub interval (2k;(2k+1)) and dierentiable aording
to Denition (2.4)(i), on eah interval of the form (2k+1);(2k), k 2Z. But, at the
pointsfkg, k2Z,noneoftheases(i)and(ii)inDenition(2.4)arefullled. Namely,
atthese pointsthe H-dierenesf(k+h) h
f(k) andf(k) h
f(k h) maynot exist
simultaneously. Also,the H-dierenes f(k) h
f(k+h)andf(k h) h
f(k) annot
exist simultaneously, so f is not dierentiable at k in none of the ases (i) and (ii) of
dierentiability in Denition (2.4). Instead, it will be dierentiable as in the ases (iii)
and (iv) in Denition (2.4). Another argument for the importane of the ases (iii) and
(iv) in Denition (2.4), is in the Theorem (2.2). Indeed, above stated theorem dose not
over the ase when f(t;x) has not onstant monotoniity. In these ases (i) and (ii)
of dierentiability in Denition (2.4), so the ases (iii) and (iv) in Denition (2.4) may
beome important as swith points. In the speial ase when f is a fuzzy-valued funtion,
we have the following result.
Theorem 2.3. (See e.g. [21 ℄). Let f : R ! E be a funtion and denote f(t) =
(f(t;r);f(t;r)), for eah r2[0;1℄. Then
(1) If f is(i)-dierentiable, then f(t;r) and f(t;r) are dierentiablefuntions and
f 0
(t)=(f 0
(t;r);f 0
(t;r))
(2) If f is(ii)-dierentiable,then f(t;r) and f(t;r) are dierentiable funtions and
f 0
(t)=(f 0
(t;r);f 0
(t;r))
Denition 2.5. (See [5 , 6℄) Let f : (a;b)E ! E and x
0
2 (a;b). We Dene the
nth-order dierential of f as follow: We say that f is strongly generalized dierentiable
of the nth order at x
0
. If there exists an element f (s)
(x
0
) 2E; 8s= 1;:::;n, suh
that
(i) for all h>0 suÆientlysmall,
9f (s 1)
(x +h) f (s 1)
(x ); 9f (s 1)
(x ) f (s 1)
and the limits(in the metriD) lim h&0 f (s 1) (x 0
+h) f (s 1) (x 0 ) h = lim h&0 f (s 1) (x 0 ) f (s 1) (x 0 h) h =f (s) (x 0 ) or
(ii) for all h>0 suÆientlysmall,
9f (s 1) (x 0 ) f (s 1) (x 0
+h); 9f (s 1) (x 0 h) f (s 1) (x 0 )
and the limits(in the metriD)
lim h&0 f (s 1) (x 0 ) f (s 1) (x 0 +h) h = lim h&0 f (s 1) (x 0
h) f(x
0 ) h =f (s) (x 0 ) or
(iii) for all h>0 suÆientlysmall,
9f (s 1)
(x
0
+h) f (s 1) (x 0 ); 9f (s 1) (x 0 h) f (s 1) (x 0 )
and the limits(in the metriD)
lim h&0 f (s 1) (x 0
+h) f (s 1) (x 0 ) h = lim h&0 f (s 1) (x 0 h) f (s 1) (x 0 ) h =f (s) (x 0 ) or
(iv) for all h>0 suÆientlysmall,
9f (s 1) (x 0 ) f (s 1) (x 0
+h); 9f (s 1) (x 0 ) f (s 1) (x 0 h)
and the limits(in the metriD)
lim h&0 f (s 1) (x 0 ) f (s 1) (x 0 +h) h = lim h&0 f (s 1) (x 0 ) f (s 1) (x 0 h) h =f (s) (x 0 )
(h and h atdenominators mean 1
h and
1
h
, respetively 8s=1:::n)
To more detail about dierent ases of strongly generalized dierentiability see [5 ,6 ℄
Denition2.6. [6℄Letf(x)beontinuousfuzzy-valuefuntion. Supposethat f(x)e px
improper fuzzyRimannintegrableon [0;1),then R
1
0
f(x)e px
dxisalled fuzzylaplae
transforms and isdenoted as:
L[f(x)℄= Z
1
0
f(x)e px
dx (p>0 and integer)
we have
Z
1
f(x)e px
dx=( Z
1
f(x;r)e px
dx; Z
1
f(x;r)e px
also by using the denition of lassial laplae transform:
`[f(x;r)℄ = R
1
0
f(x;r)e px
dx and `[f(x;r)℄
= R
1
0
f(x;r)e px
dx
then, we follow:
L[f(x)℄=(`[f(x;r)℄;`[f(x;r)℄):
Theorem 2.4. [6℄ Let f 0
(x) bean integrable fuzzy-valued funtion,and f(x)isthe
prim-itiveof f 0
(x) on [0;1). Then
L[f 0
(x)℄=pL[f(x)℄ h
f(0) where f is (i) differentiable
or
L[f 0
(x)℄=( f(0)) h
( pL[f(x)℄) where f is (ii) differentiable
Theorem2.5. [6 ℄Letf(x),g(x)beontinuous-fuzzy-valued funtionsand
1 ,
2
are
on-stant. Suppose that f(x)e px
, g(x)e px
are improper fuzzy Rimann-integrable on [0;1),
then
L [(
1
f(x))(
2
g(x))℄=(
1
L[f(x)℄)(
2
L [g(x)℄):
Theorem 2.6. [6℄ Let f beontinuousfuzzy value funtion and L [f(x)℄ =F(p),Then
L[e ax
f(x)℄=F(p a)
wheree ax
is real value funtion and p a>0.
3 Laplae transform formula on two order fuzzy derivative
and its appliations
In this setion, by using denition of laplae transform on rst-order fuzzy derivative,
laplae transform formula on seond-order fuzzy derivative is introdued then laplae
transformmethod forsolvingseond-order fuzzydierentialequation isproposed.
Theorem3.1. . Letf :R!E beafuntion anddenote f(t)=(f(t;r);f(t;r)),for eah
r2[0;1℄. Then
(1) If f;f 0
aredierentiable in the rst form (i) or f;f 0
aredierentiable in the seond
form (ii), then f 0
(t;r) and f 0
(t;r) are dierentiablefuntions and
f 00
(t)=(f 00
(t;r);f 00
(t;r))
(2) If f is (i)-dierentiable and f 0
is dierentiable in the seond form (ii) or f is
(ii)-dierentiable and f 0
is dierentiable in the rst form (i) , then f 0
(t;r) and f 0
(t;r)
are dierentiablefuntions and
f 00
(t)=(f 00
(t;r);f 00
Proof: Sine the proof proedure is similar for all two ases, we onsider ase (1)
withoutlossof generality.
Iff;f 0
isdierentiable intherst form(i), thenfrom theorem(2.3), we have:
f 0
(t)=(f 0
(t;r);f 0
(t;r))
now, onsiderg(t)asfollows:
g(t)=f 0
(t)
ifh>0 and r2[0;1℄, wehave
g(t+h) h
g(t)=(g(t+h;r) g(t;r);g(t+h;r) g(t;r))
=(f 0
(t+h;r) f 0
(t;r);f 0
(t+h;r) f 0
(t;r))
and,multipliedby 1
h
, wehave:
g(t+h) h g(t) h =( f 0
(t+h;r) f 0 (t;r) h ; f 0
(t+h;r) f 0 (t;r) h ) similarly, f 0 (t) h f 0 (t h) h =( f 0
(t;r) f 0
(t h;r)
h
; f
0
(t;r) f 0
(t h;r)
h
)
passingto the limit,wehave:
f 00
(t)=(f 00
(t;r);f 00
(t;r))
and Iff;f 0
isdierentiableinthe rst form(ii), thenfrom theorem (2.3),wehave:
f 0
(t)=(f 0
(t;r);f 0
(t;r))
now, onsiderg(t)asfollows:
g(t)=f 0
(t)
ifh<0 and r2[0;1℄, wehave
g(t+h) h
g(t)=(g(t+h;r) g(t;r);g(t+h;r) g(t;r))
=(f 0
(t+h;r) f 0
(t;r);f 0
(t+h;r) f 0
(t;r))
and,multipliedby 1
h
, wehave:
g(t+h) h g(t) h =( f 0
(t+h;r) f 0 (t;r) h ; f 0
(t+h;r) f 0 (t;r) h ) similarly, f 0 (t) h f 0 (t h) h =( f 0
(t;r) f 0
(t h;r)
h
; f
0
(t;r) f 0
(t h;r)
h
)
passingto the limit,wehave:
f 00
(t)=(f 00
(t;r);f 00
Denition 3.1. For arbitrary u=(u(r);u (r)), h
u and h
( u) are dened as follows:
h
u=( u (r); u(r))
h
( u)=(u(r);u (r))
Theorem 3.2. Let f 00
(x) be an integrable fuzzy-valued funtion, and f(x);f 0
(x) are the
primitive of f 0
(x);f 00
(x) on [0;1). Then
L[f 00
(x)℄ =p 2 L[f(x)℄ h pf(0) h f 0 (0)
where f is (i) differentiable and f 0
is (i) differentiable
or L[f 00 (x)℄ = h ( p) h
( p)L [f(x)℄ h h
( p) h
( 1)f(0) h h
( 1)f 0
(0)
where f is (ii) differentiable and f 0
is (ii) differentiable
or L[f 00 (x)℄ = h ( p 2
)L[f(x)℄ h h
( p)f(0) h h
( 1)f 0
(0)
where f is (i) differentiable and f 0
is (ii) differentiable
or L[f 00 (x)℄ = h ( p 2
)L[f(x)℄ h h
( p)f(0) h
f 0
(0)
where f is (ii) differentiable and f 0
is (i) differentiable
Proof: By indution, it an be proved easily. we shall now disuss how the laplae
transformmethod solvesfuzzy dierentialequations.
Considerthefollowingfuzzyinitial value problem
y 00
+ay 0
+by=er(t) y(t
0 )= e k 0 ; y 0 (t 0 )= e k 1
withonstant aand b.
By applyingthelaplaetransformmethod on fuzzyinitial value problem,wehave:
L[y 00
℄+aL[y 0
℄+bL[y℄=L[er(t)℄
Then,bysubstituting,laplaetransformformulason rstand seond-order fuzzy
deriva-tive intheorem (2.4) and (3.2) we obtainthefollowingalternativesforsolving:
Case I. Ifweonsider y(t)and y 0
(t) byusing(i)-dierentiable,thenwe have
p 2
L[y(t)℄ h
py(t
0 ) h y 0 (t 0
)apL[y(t)℄ h
ay(t
0
)bL[y(t)℄=L[er(t)℄
Case II. Ifwe onsider y(t) andy 0
(t)byusing(ii)-dierentiable,thenwe have
p 2
L[y(t)℄ h
py(t ) y 0
(t )a( h
ay(t
0
)bL[y(t)℄=L[er(t)℄
CaseIII.Ifweonsidery(t)byusing(i)-dierentiableandy 0
(t)byusing(ii)-dierentiable,
thenwehave
( h
( p 2
))L[y(t)℄( p)y(t
0 ) y
0
(t
0
)apL[y(t)℄ h
ay(t
0
)bL[y(t)℄=L[er(t)℄
CaseIV.Ifweonsidery(t)byusing(ii)-dierentiableandy 0
(t)byusing(i)-dierentiable,
thenwehave
( h
( p 2
))L[y(t)℄( p)y(t
0 )
h
y 0
(t
0 )(
h
p)aL[y(t)℄
( a)y(t
0
)bL[y(t)℄=L[er(t)℄
usingthisrepresentationforfourases, we havethe followingexamples.
4 example
In this setion, we present two examples to illustrate the laplae transform method and
also omparethe resultsofthismethod withother method.
Example 4.1. Consider the one-dimensional heatLetus onsider the seond order fuzzy
dierential equation
8
<
: y
00
3y 0
+2y= e
4
y 0
(0)= e
0
y(0)= e
1
where e
1=(0:8+0:2r;1:5 0:5r) and e
4=(3:2+0:8r;5 r):byusingfuzzylaplaetransform
method, we have:
L[y 00
℄ 3L[y 0
℄2L[y℄ =L[ e
4 ℄
in (i) dierentiable, then by using ase(II), we have
L[y(t;r) ℄=(3:2+0:8r)
1
p(p 1)(p 2)
+(0:8+0:2r)
p 3
(p 1)(p 2)
L[y(t;r)℄=(5 r)
1
p(p 1)(p 2)
+(1:5 0:5r)
p 3
(p 1)(p 2)
Henesolution isas follows:
y(t;r)=(3:2+0:8r)( 1
2 e
t
+ 1
2 e
2t
)+(0:8+0:2r)(2e t
e 2t
)
y(t;r)=(5 r)( 1
2 e
t
+ 1
2 e
2t
)+(1:5 0:5r)(2e t
e 2t
)
Now, if we onsider r=1, then
y(t;1)=y(t;1) =2 2e t
+e 2t
:
By using H-dierentiability and Hukuhara dierentiability onepts the following results
are obtained:
y(t;r)=( 1:6 0:4r)osht 4
sinht+( 0:8+0:2r)osh2t 2
+ 1
3 (e
2t
e 2t
) 1
3 (e
t
e t
)+ 1
3
(5 r)t+ 1
2
(3:2+0:8r) 0:8 0:2r
y(t;r)= 2osht (1:6+0:4r)sinht+osh2t+(0:2r 0:8)sinh2t+ 5
2 1
2 r
The disadvantage of strongly generalized dierentiability of a funtion with respet to
H-dierentiabilityandHukuharadierentiabilityseemstobethatafuzzydierentialequation
has notgot a unique solution. So a fuzzy dierentialequationmayhave several solutions.
the advantage of the existene of these solutions is that we an hoose the solution that
reetsthe behavior of the modelled real-world system, in a betterway.
Example 4.2. onsider the initial value problem equation
8
<
: y
00
+4y = e
4 x
y 0
(0)=0
y(0)= e
1
where e
1= (0:8+0:2r;1:5 0:5r) and e
4 =(3:2+0:8r;5 r): in (ii) dierentiable, then
by using ase(I), we have
L[y(t;r)℄ py(0;r) y 0
(0;r)+4L[y(t;r)℄=L[(3:2+0:8r)t℄
L[y(t;r) ℄ py(0;r) y 0
(0;r)+4L[y(t;r)℄=L[(5 r)t℄
Henesolution isas follows:
y(t;r)=(0:8+0:2r)(x 1
2
sin2t+os2t)
y(t;r)=(5 r)( 1
4 t
1
8
sin2t)+(1:5 0:5r)os2t
Now, if we onsider r=1, then
y(t;1)=y(t;1)=x 1
2
sin2x+os2x
From,examples (4)and (4.2),we seethat thesolution ofa FDE is dependent on the
seletionof thederivative: the(i)-dierentiable orthe(ii)-dierentiable.
5 Conlusion
Developingfuzzy Laplaetransform,weprovidedsolutions to fuzzytwo orderdierential
equationwhihwasinterpretedbyusingthestronglygeneralizeddierentiabilityonept.
Referenes
[1℄ S.Abbasbandy, T.Allahviranloo,Numerial solutionoffuzzy dierentialequationby
Tailor method,Journal of Computational Method in AppliedMathematis 2 (2002)
113-124.
[2℄ S.Abbasbandy,T.Allahviranloo,O.Lopez-Pouso, J.J.Nieto,Numerialmethodsfor
fuzzy dierential inlusions, Computer and Mathematis With Appliations
48/10-11(2004)1633-164 1.
[3℄ T. Allahviranloo, N. Ahmady, E. Ahmady, Numerial solution of fuzzy
dieren-tial equations by preditor-orretor method, Information Sienes, 177/7 (2007)
16331647.
[4℄ T. Allahviranloo, M. Barkhordari, Fuzzy Laplae transforms, Soft
Comput,14(2010)235-243.
[5℄ T. Allahviranloo, N. A. Kiani, N. Motamedi, Solving Fuzzy Dierential Equations,
InformationSienes,179 (2009) 956-966.
[6℄ T.Allahviranloo,N.A.Kiani,M.Barkhordari,TowardtheExistaneanduniqueness
of solutions of seond-order fuzzy Dierential Equations, Information Sienes, 179
(2009) 1207-1215.
[7℄ T. Allahviranloo, Dierene methods for fuzzy partial dierential equations,
Com-putationalmethodsinappliead mathematis, 2(2002),No. 3,PP. 233-242. 169 (2005)
16-33.
[8℄ G. A. Anastassiou, S.G. Gal, On a fuzzy trigonometri approximation theorem of
Weierstrass-type, Journalof Fuzzy Mathematis 9(2004)701-708.
[9℄ B. Bede, S.G. Gal, Generalizations of the dierentiability of fuzzy-number-valued
funtions with appliations to fuzzy dierential equations, Fuzzy Sets and Systems
151(2005)581-599 .
[10℄ B. Bede, I. J. Rudas, A. L. Bensik, First order linear fuzzy dierential equations
undergeneralized dierentiability,informationsienes, 177 (2006)1648-1662.
[11℄ B. Bede, S.G. Gal, Almost periodi fuzzy -number-value funtions, Fuzzy Sets and
Systems147(2004)385-403 .
[12℄ B. Bede, S. G. Gal, Generalizations of the dierentiability of fuzzy-number-valued
funtions with appliations to fuzzy dierential equations, Fuzzy Sets and Systems
151(2005)581-599 .
[13℄ B. Bede, I. Rudas, A. Bensik, First order linear fuzzy dierential equations under
generalizeddierentiablity,informationseieness 177(2006)3627-36 35 .
[14℄ B. Bede, Imre J. Rudas , Attila L., First order linear fuzzy dierential equations
undergeneralized dierentiabilityInformationSienes 177 (2007) 3627-3635 .
[16℄ J.J.Bukly, Simulating ContinuousFuzzy Systems, Springer,2006.
[17℄ J. J. Bukly, T. Feuring, Introdution to fuzzy partial dierential equations. Fuzzy
Setsand Systems105 (1999)241-248.
[18℄ R.B. Bird, W. E.Stewartand E. N.Lightfoot, Transpart Phenomena, 2nd ed,John
Wileyand Sons, NewYork, 2002.
[19℄ JamesJ.Bukly,ThomasFeuring,Introdutiontofuzzypartialdierentialequations,
Fuzzy Setsand Systems105 (1999), PP. 241-248.
[20℄ WuCongxin, S.Shiji,Existenetheorem tothe Cauhyproblemof fuzzydierential
equationsunderompatness-typeonditins.InformationSienes108(1998)123-134.
[21℄ Y.Chalo-Cano,H.Roman-Flores,Onnew solutionsoffuzzy dierentialequations,
Chaos,Solitonsand Fratals 38 (2006) 112-119.
[22℄ S.S.L.Chang,L.Zadeh,Onfuzzymappingandontrol.IEEEtransSystemCybernet,
2(1972) 30-34.
[23℄ S.S.L.ChangandL.A.Zadeh,Onfuzzymappingandontrol,IEEETrans.Systems
ManCybernet.2(1972) 30-34.
[24℄ M. Dehghan, A nite dierene method for a non-loal boundary value
prob-lem for two-dimensional heat equation, Applied Mathematis and Computation
112(2000)133-142 .
[25℄ D. Dubios,H. Prade,Fuzzy numbers: an overview,in: J. Bezdek(Ed.), Analysis of
Fuzzy Information,CRCPress, 1987,pp.112-148.
[26℄ Z.Ding, M. Ma,A.Kandel,Existeneof thesolutionsof fuzzydierentialequations
withparameters,InformationSienes 99(1997) 205-217.
[27℄ D. Dubios, H.Prade, Towards fuzzy dierential alulus, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 8
(1982) 1-7,105-116, 225-233.
[28℄ M. Friedman,M. Ming, A.Kandel,Fuzzy linear systems,FSS, 96 (1998) 201-209.
[29℄ M.Friedman,M.Ming,A.Kandel,Numerialsolutionoffuzzydierentialandintegral
equations,Fuzzy Setsand System 106 (1999) 35-48.
[30℄ R. Goetshel, W. Voxman, Elementeryalulus, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 18 (1986)
31-43.
[31℄ S.G. Gal,Approximationtheoryinfuzzysetting,in: G.A.Anastassiou (Ed.),
Hand-book of Analyti-Computational Methods in Applied Mathematis, Chapman Hall
CRCPress, 2000, pp.617-666.
[32℄ M. Ghanbari, Numerial solution of fuzzy initial value problems under generalized
dierentiabilitybyHPM,Int.J. IndustrialMathematis,Vol. 1,No.1 (2009) 19-39.
[34℄ L.J. Jowers, J. J. Bukly, K. D. Reilly, Simulating ontinuous fuzzy systems,
Infor-mationSienes 177 (2007)436-448.
[35℄ O.Kaleva,Fuzzy dierentialequations, fuzzy Setsand Systems24 (1987) 301-317.
[36℄ O. Kaleva, The Cauhy problem for fuzzy dierential equations, Fuzzy Sets and
Systems35 (1990) 389-396.
[37℄ A. Kandel, Fuzzy dynamial systems and the nature of their solutions, in: P. P.
Wang,S.K.Chang(Eds),FuzzySetsTheoryandAppliationtoPoliyAnalysisand
InformationSystems,PlenumPress, NewYork, 1980,PP,. 93-122.
[38℄ A.Kandel,W.J.Byatt,Fuzzydierentialequations,in:ProeedingoftheInterational
Confereneon CybernetisandSoiety, Tokyo,Novermber 1978, PP. 1213-12160.
[39℄ P. Kloeden, Remarks on Peano-like theorems for fuzzy dierential equations, Fuzzy
Setsand Systems44(1991) 161-164.
[40℄ OuyangHe,WuYi,onfuzzydierentialequations,FuzzySetsandSystems32(1989)
321-325.
[41℄ M. Ma, M. Friedman, A. Kandel,Numerial solutionof fuzzy dierentialequations,
Fuzzy Setsand Systems105 (1999) 133-138.
[42℄ W.Menda,LinearfuzzydierentialequationsystemsonR 1
,JounalofFuzzySystems
Mathematis2 (1)(1988)51-56, inhinese.
[43℄ M. L. Puri, D. Ralesu, Fuzzy random variables, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 114 (1986)
409-422.
[44℄ M.L.Puri,D.Ralesu,Dierentialforfuzzyfuntion,J.Math.Anal.Appl.91(1983)
552-558.
[45℄ S. Seikkala, On the fuzzy initial value problem, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 24 (1987)
319-330.
[46℄ S.Song, C. Wu, Existene and uniqueness of solutions to Cauhy problem of fuzzy
dierentialequations,FuzzySet andSystem 110 (2000) 55-67.
[47℄ H. C. Wu, The improper fuzzy Riemann integral and its numerial integration, In
form.si.111(1999), 109-137.
[48℄ H.C. Wu, Thefuzzy Riemannintegraland its numerialintegration,Fuzzy Setand
Systems110(2000) 1-25.
[49℄ J. Xu, Z. Liao, Z. Hu, A lass of linear dierential dynamial systems with fuzzy
initialondition,FuzzySets and Systems, 158 (2007) 2339-2358.
[50℄ L.Zadeh,Towardageneralizedtheoryofunertainty(GTU) anoutline,Information
Sienes,172 (2005) 140.
[51℄ L.Zadeh, Isthereaneedforfuzzy logi,InformationSienes,178 (2008)2751-2779.
[52℄ H.J.Zimmerman,Fuzzyprogrammingandlinearprogrammingwithseveralobjetive