KS
#
P-059
Burkhart M L RLHILLER11f
Genieralmajor
Qhef of Staff of Third P& izer Army
PROJECT
#
47
GNRMAN~
TAINK
LOSSiES
Koenigetein/Ts
3.0 Nov 31950
Translator: M. FRIK
IEditort
G; VAN1'DRSTADT
Reviewers
Cat
]3,X, HUFFORD
HISTORICAL
DI VISION
MS
P-059
MS #
P-459
File No 72 C 12 Dec 1950
MOAI"Ui
FORt Chief,Operational
History (Germ) BranchLt
Col
NAWLOCK1Y
SUBJECT:
MS f P.059, Project
#
47,
TA1NK
LOSSES
The following Questions are not answered fully: lb Tank strength within Feldheer, listed by theater,.
2b Tank losses and replacement for Polish, Norwegian,
French, etc, campaigns,
2c Breakdown of losses by causative agents~ The topic leader states that he cannot answer these questions more fully,
No information at all is given on the bases used in
predicting tank losses (question 2d) and the answer to
question
2e (guidance furnished tank producers...) is so vague that it can hardly be called an answer at all.In his introduction, the topic leader refers to a con-tribut ion by Emil LD , the former chief of the Army Armament Office, This contribution contains very much the same informat;
ion embodied in the study but also gives the names
and.
presentaddresses of persons who should be able to give more detailed information on product ion and so forth, He further states that an illustration of the TIGER Panzer and of the model developed by PORSCHE*, the
ELEPHANT Panzer
on a demonstration trip (No 20)was printed in the September issue of the PINGUIN**,
Professor PORSCHE, the designer of the Volkswagen
** Good illustrations and descriptions of all German panzer types are to be found in the HANDBOOK
ON
GERMA1O MILITARYFORCE S,
H, HEI TiA n1
MS
#
?-059
The Author
Herman -Burkhart
U
ERHILL BA1Ifl,Gene ralajr,
Born.,- 26 Dec 1904, Dieuze, Lorraine,
;iU: +L +' -HILLeZeBRAN received training
in the Ohrdruf Officer Candidate School
in 1925 after having served since April
1923 in the 16th Cavalzry Regiment, and.
later
underwent
further training at the Hannover Cavalry School in 1925/26and
at the Berlin War College in 1934/368
Just before World far II broke out, on
15 September 1939, he was transferred
from the Organization Division of Army
General Staff to the 93 Inf Div as
Oper-ations Officer, On . October 1940 he was
assigned. as adjutant to the Chief of Army General Staff end in April 1942
as
appoint-ed Chief of Organization Division of Army
General Staff. In 1944, after two brief
spells in the OKH Officer Reserve and an assignment as Commander of 24th Panzer
Regiment, NI +LER-HIa B I'D was assigned
as Chief of Staff to XJOXVI Panzer Corps in
Ukraine and Poland, remaining in that position until transferred as Chief of Staff to the Third Panzer Army, During the Wear he served.
in France, Italy and on the east front and
was finally captured near Schwerin, Mecklenburg
MS
F
P-059
CONTENTS
Pg
COHN3iNS
ON
G'B.AN
TAX K
LO SSEiS
y r v a v $ a . tI
6 RU A o
R
Y
A
K
S MD,,.V""
4 6O' aai 2Gere.n
Nomenclature and Abbreviations used
in
the Text
3
1,
TYPEiS
AND
AIu
A1:
T
OF ARM'OREDf
V. I
CLi3
s
*"
*4
a.,
Types
of' Tank Carriages . , .. . .4
b*
Tak
f * f .4 " " $ $ a90 -
. * a . ." " 4c.,
Assault Guns and
Je.
.panzers (Tank Destroyers).
6
d.,
Antitank Cannon on Self'--Propelled
Mount
, .. *7
e, Nomenclature of'
Weapons
and Their Abbreviations
,8
f,
Performaceof
KwKand
Pak~
~
,9
2;p
TANK
STREiNGTH
aW aa
"m
. vs a b r10
a,
Tank
s , ,. a . a.~ . v .. .r eafvavo . , 10b,
Assault Guns
and
Jagdpanzers (Tank Destroyers),
10
C,Pak
on Self- ropelled.
IMounts,
,10
M4S
#
p-059
Franz EALDEIHR Koenigstein/l 7 Nov 1950
Genobst a )
COMMET~itS
0N GBRA TANKLOSSES
(Project
~
4'?; MS#
pO59)After a thorough study of the subject, the topic leader, former
Genmaj Butrkhart Mueller-Hillebrextd, has succeeded. in answering most of
the uestions in detail,
For question ib, allocation of tanks to theaters of operation,
incomplete data only, covering the years 1940, 1943, 1944 and 1945, could
be obtained, and these do not provide as comprehensive a picture as to the
statistics on strength, production and losses,
As
for the breaking downof tank losses according to campaign (question 2 b), according to
types of loss (whether permanent or temporary) and according to cause
(question 2 c), it was impossible to procure data useful in the
preparat-ion
of
statistics,
The
topic leader was able) however, to anwer in greater detail theremaining question pertaining to strength, production and losses, The
replies are given in the form of tables ani. graphic charts (See
appen-dices), They are of great value because of their completeness and the
clearness with which they have been presented and in this respect they are perh-aps unique,
In regard to the text, I am in full accord
with
the author.(signed) Franz HALDER
MS
j
p-059
PREFATORY
REMARKS
Principal
sources of
information available to
the author were the monthly bulletins
published
by
the German
Army Ordnance
Office under the title,
Suirve
of
Army
armament,
These served as the
offici
al statistical basis for the German Wehrmacht,
In
addition, the original documents of the Inspector
General of the Tank Forces were made available to the
author, and these contained the data for his reports
to the
FuIehrer,
'These
sources
may
be regarded as
reliable.
In addition, Gen d Art a D Leeb, the former
Chief
of the
Army
Ordnance Office, also made a study
MS
#PO59
In conformity with the original manuscript, German nomenclature
and abbreviations have been retained throughout the translation,
In order to facilitate the reading of
this
study
and attached
statistics, the German nomenclature and abbreviations used in the
text have been consolidated on this page,
Flakc
K
Kwk
MG
Pak
Pak/ Sf1
P
z
Bef W
Pz Kpfw
Stu Gesch
Plug
zeuga bwehrkano
ne
Kanone
Kampfwagenkanone
Maschinengewehr
Panzerabwehrkenone
Panzerabwehrkenone auf
Selb
stfahrlafet
te
Penzerbef ehl swagen
Panz
erkampfwagen
Sturmgeschuetz
Stu H
Stu K
Stu Ps
Sturmhaubit ze
St urmka none
Sturmpanzer
Jagdpanzer
HJiashorn"
Panzer
antiaircraft gun
cannon
tank gun
machine gun
antitank
gun
antitank gun on
self-propelled
mount
armored command car
tank
assault gun
(self-propell-ed)
assault howitzer
(self-propelled)
assault cannon (self-*
propelled)
assault tank
tank destroyer
MS
#
p-0O59
1,
TYPES AND AR
M
NET
OF
ABMORL)
VEHICLE~S
a,
Types
of Tank
Carriages:
Abbreviation: Panzerkanipfwagen .Ltank/
Pz
Kpfw
Panzer
Beofehl swagen
Larmnored
command
carj:
Pz Bef
W~
Carriages:
I to VI, 35 (t),, 38
(t).
The two latter types were
taken from the Ozechoslovakian Army and were produced
in Ozechoslovakian factories,
b~
Tanks:
Principal Weapon**
Date Indtroduced to
Troop
Units
Pz Kpfw I
Ps
Kpfw II
Pz Kpfw
II (F)
Pz
Kpfw
35
(t)
Ps
Kpfw 38 (t)
Ps
Kpfw III
MG
Kw K 38, 20 mm
Flame thrower
Kw K 37 mm
Kw K
3?
mm
Kw K 3? mm
Kw K 50 mm L 42
Kw K 50 mm L 60
Kw K 75 mm L 24
*
Designation of ti'e
includes
designation of
carriage.
*
Cf
.Sec. e
tror
abbreviations of
weapor
nomenclature.
Type*
use in
if toalready
II 'I if1940
, Ii Bt i, II if i is ifJan 1941
Jan 1942
July 1942
Iv#P-05,9
Principal Weapon
Date Introduced to Troop Units
Pz
Kpfw III
(i')
Pz
Kp'lr IV
Pz
Kpf'w V Panther
Pz
Kpfw
VI
Tiger I
Pz Kpf'w VI Tiger
Flak
tank on
carriage
38 (t) and
IV
Pz
:8etf
W
(carriage
I-VT )
Recovery tank (carri-'
a'ge
38 (t),
III, IV,
V)
Flamethro~rer
Kw K
75 mm
L.24
KW K 40, 75 mm
L
43
and. 48
Pak
42,
75
mm
L
70
Kw K
42,
75 mm L 70
Kw K 36, 88
mmL
56
Kw K 43, 88 mm L 71
Flak
20mm,
20mm-four-barreled
Flak 37 mm,
30 mm
double-barreled
same as Pz
Kpfw
1-VI
Feb 43
already in use in 1940
April 42
Aug 44
Feb 43
June 42
Niov
43
1Nov
43
Jun 43
*
Also called Komnigtiger
LtRoyal
Tigerf,
MS f p--059
C,
Asault
Guns~ and. JagdpanzersLTank
Destroyers-7
Abbreviations:
Type*
Sturngeschuetz
L;assault
gun7: Stu~ Gesch
Kamrofwagenkexione
tank cannonj:
Kw
K
Sturmhaubitze
Lasseult howitzer
7:Stu
H
Sturmnkanone
.Lassault
cannonf
Stu K
Sturmpanzer Lassault tanskj Stu Pz
Principal
Weapon
Date Introduced to
Troop U~nits
Stu Gesch III
Stu
Gesch IV
Stu H 42 (carriage
III)
Stu Pz (carriage IV)
Jagdpanzer
38***
Jagd~pan~zer IV
Jagdpant her
(carriage V)
£lefhnt (carriage
VI)**
Jagdtiger (carriage
VI)
Kw K 75 mm L 24
Stu K 40, 75 nun L 48
Stui K
40,
75 mm L 48
Stu H 42, 105 mm L 28
Stu H 43, 150 mm L 12
?ack 39, 75 mm L
48
Pack 39, 75 mm L 48
Pack 43/3, 88 mm L 71
Pak 43/2, 88 mm L 71
Pak
80,
128 mm L 55
already
in
use in 1940
Apr 42
Dec 43
Mar 43
Apr
43
Apr
44
Jan 44
Oct 43
Apr 43
Feb 44
Dlesignation of type includes designation of carriages,
Cf.
Sec.
e for abbreviations of wee; on nomenclature,
Also
'called
"Panzerjaeger
38" or "Hetzer".
Also celled "Ferdinand" or
"18.8
$tu Gesch, it,
* ** **4s
MS #
PO'59
d~.
Ant ita k Cannon on Self -Pro elled Mount
Abbreviation:
Panzerabwehrkerione auf Selbstfahrlafette:
Pak/ Sfi
Weapon
Date Introdiuced to Troop
Unit
s
7:05
Pak 40/Sfl II
71b
Pak 4U / Sfl 38
(t)
7,
5
Peik
40/
Sfl
Lorraine**
7,62
Pek/
Sfl II
7,62
Pakf
Sf1
38 (t)
Nashorn/
Sf±
III or IV
Pak
40,
75
rm
Pek
40,
75
mm
Pak 40,. 75
mm
76, 2
mm
Pak
36
or
76,2
mm K (r)***
76,2
mm
Pak 36
or
76,2
mmKIL(r)
88 mm
Pak
43/41,
L
71
from Feb
from Feb
from Apr
from
Apr
from Apr 42
from Feb 42
Designation of type includes designiation of
carriage,
French carriage,
Captured Russian gun.n,
After rebuilding they were called
117.62Pak
36" : prior rebuilding thaeir designa~tion
was
117;62
K
(r)"r',
Caliber length unknown.
Type*
M4S
#
P-.059
e,
Nomenclature of Weapons anid their
Abbreviations
Abbreviation
Nomenclature (Germani)
Translation (American)
MG'
Kw K
20 mm
3?
mm, etc~
L 42, L60
etc,
Pak
Flak
Stu K
Stu H
Mschinengewehr
Kanipfwagenkanone
Kaliberdurchmesser
in mm
Kal iberlaenge des Rohre
s
Pa c era bwehrkaxsone
Fl ie gerabw eh rkan on e
Stixrikanone
Sturmhaubitze
Machine gun
Tank cannon
Caliber diameter in mm
Length
of
the barrel
Antitank cannon
Antiaircraft gun
Assault cannon
Assault howitzer
A number behind "Kw
K"°
or
"Pak"
designates the type, such as
Kw K 42 or Pak 39, The number, however, does not indicate the year
MS
#
p-059
f. Performance of Kw K and Pak
Cali- Cali
Muzzle
Armor-piercing capacity in mm with armor-piercingber
ber
velo-.
shell 39 at an impact angel of 600 and a range ofmm length city
M/sec
100m
50Cm
100Cm
1500m
2000m
250Cm 300Cm
75 48 704 !99 91 82 67 63 75 70 925 138 129 111 9988
88 56 773 120 110 110 91 8488
71
1000
.222
185
165
148
132
18592
228
215 202 190 178 166 15514S # P#059
2,
TAILK STR1E1GTH
=Apiendix
1 shows tank strength on the following dates:
1 Septeber
1939
1 April 1940
1 September 1940
1
January 1941
After
January,
1941, strength is shown as of the first of every month
up
to
1
February 1945,
Strength in this case indicates the total strength in tanks of all
units
of the
Army
(Field
and Replacement
Army) and the
Waffen-SS
at
repair installations, schools, ordnance depots and the like4
Appendix 1
lists tanks
according to
type, which
the author
has
classified
in
the following
three
groups:
a,
Tanks
b,
Assault guns and Jagdpanzses
tank destroyers-/
c,
Pak on self-propelled mounts,
A tank is characterized by
a
revolving turret; it is the principalweapon
of the Armored
Command,
In assault guns and
Jagdpaenzer
the gun is not mounted in a turret,
which makes the vehicle lower and less ponderous and saves material and
work hours,
Assault guns and Jagdpenzers
are
principally
'employed
as
1vS #
PO59
infantry stxpprort or antitank weapons in conjunction with other arms
of the service,
The Pak on a self-.propelled mount (Pak/Sfl) is simply
an
antitankgun mounted on a tank carriage and is
lightly
armored in front and.on the sides. It is open on top. The Pak/Sfl is an emergency weapon
to compensate temporarily for the lack of production of assault guns
and Jagdpanzers.
Obsolete tank models, which can no longer be employed at the front,
are specifically designated as such in Appendix 1.
They were normally used in the Replacement Army; by occupation
troops and in the protection of troops against partisans, The carriages
of some of these tanks which had not been removed comletely from Army
inventories were rebuilt sa PekfSf1 or Jagdpanzers.
It has not been possible, in Appendix 1, to break down the vehicles
according
to theater or according to Field. and Replacement Army,It was possible to give a limited breekdown according to theater but
only for certain key-dates,
a.
In the Western Camaign of &ay 1940 the'following tanks participated as part of the Field. Army (The figure in brackets denotesthe strength, but only after 1 April
1940,
TheWestern; Campaign
(second column) began on 10May
1940)Pz,
Kpfw.
1 523 (1062)II 955 (1079)
" " III
349
(329)*
* The figure for ?z,Xpfw III participating in the
Western
Campaign, whichexceeds the strength as of 1 April, is explained by the fact that vehicles
of this type rolling off production lines in April were delivered to the
KS
#
p-059
Pz
Kpfw
IV
278
(280)
a
"a35 t
106
(143).
11 "
38 t
228
(238)
Pz
Bef W
Larmoaconmand
car
135(2)
Total
2574
(.3379
)
b,
The following tanks were
employed
on the
Eastern
Front
on
4
M
1943
by the field forces, inclusive of the Wfaffen-SS. (The
figuires in brackets denote strength of the respective types as of
1
Mae~
1943)
:
Pz IKpfw
III
507
(1465)
f
IV
541
(1077)
Har
VI
72
(165)
In repair installations
Total:o
162(230
NIote:
The difference between the figures in the second column and
those in brackets is accounted for by
distribution
over the remaining
theaters, the Replacement Army, tank repair installations. in the Zone
of Interior and the ordnance depots,
c,
The Ps
fw II
VI and assault guns employed on the
Eastern Front on
10
June 1943 by the field
forces,
inclusive of the
Waffen-SS
amounted
to the following:
MS
#
p059(The figure in brackets denotes total Army strength
as
of 1 June 1943),;Ready for employment 2569
In repair installations 463
Total 3032 (5416)
Notes The difference between the figure and that in -brackets was
distributed as set forth under b, above,
d, A breakdown covering much the same period and several
theaters is possible for the beginning of 1944. (Figures denoting
total Army strength are added in brackets)
Pz Kpfw III (ready for action)
Pz
Kpfw IV ( ready for action) Pz Kpfw V (ready for act ion)Pz
Kpfw
VI (ready foraction)
Pz Bef W (ready for
action) Assault guns Italy 1 Feb 106 171 8 6
141
West 29 Feb 99 58? 290 63 194 Last 23 Feb 44 ZIRepair
Total29
Feb 44
450 405 128 78 655:1
171
StrengthI1
Mar44
(
888)
1163 I(1824)418
(1339)
149'
(504)
6 (466)506
(~no
Total (ready for action) 432 1233 1519In repair installJationsf 49 1534 1232
- ---
-I-~-
--- -'
r - - -"- 1 - - --~- - I - -rc---
--
---
MS
#
p-059The difference in number of vehicles, i.e. the difference between 8031 and 5999 (2032 vehicles) applies to vehicles in use by occupation
troops in N5orway and in the Balkans, including Crete and Rhodes, newly
activated units in the Zone of Interior, ordnance depots and. the Replace-ment Army.
e, The following survey shows the reinforcements, according
to month and type of tank, assigned to the tank forces in the
'West
dur-ing the six months preceddur-ing the Allied invasion. The percentage of allover tank strength represented by each month's reinforcement, isindicated by figures in brackets.
Date Pz III
j
Pz
IVPz
V Pz VI Stu Gesch Total(%)
1%)
(
Jgdpz
(%)(%)
31 Dec 43 145(16)
316 (19) 157 (14)j 38 (10) 223 (10) 879 (14) 31 Jan 44 98 (11) 410 (24) 180 (15)' 64 (15) 171 (7)1
923 (14) 29 Feb 44 99 (11) 587 (32) 290 (22) 63 (12) 194 (6) 1210 (16) 31Mar
44 99 (12) 52? (25) 323 (20) 45 (9) 211 (7) 11205(15)
30 Apr
44
114 (14)
674
(32)
514 (31)'101
(18)
219 (7)
1622
(19)
10 Jun 44 39 (5) 748 (32) 663 (35) 102 (16) 310 (8) 1862 (20)MiS
; P059-1.
IT.
Pz
Kpf'w
and
Stu Gesch with the field forces on the
eastern Front as of' 5 Januar 1945:
Stu Ge sch
?z units; brigades
Pz
Jaeger
companies
0)) ro y4E (q } {Total
F..stern
Front
Strength
(according to
Appendix
1)
Pz
Kpfw
IV
Pz
Bef
W,
Flakpz
Stu Gesch
Jagdp z
596
670
26
641
1933
902
949
902
949
596
670
26
2492
3784
(2259)
(1982)
(428)
(576)
( 6167)
(11412)
*Already
included in the figures directly above.
0)
Stu Gesch Brigades ~[Sturmgeschxetz Brigaden
-Assault
gun brigades
/
are
GHC,
troops for the reinf'orcement of' infaentry divisions,
0))
Pz
Jaeger companies are component parts of' infantry divisions,,
N~oce:
The great Russian offensive, which extended over the entire
Eastern Front began on 15 January 1945,
-15
us
#
P-059
g,
Tank strength
at
the
Wetern
Front on 5 February 1945:
Strength
Readyr for
ion
act-
Strength
(accord-ing
to Appendix 1)
Pz
Kpfw
III
and IV
110
68
(2810)
ifn
V
219
.96
(1964)
if "rVI
61
26
(
404)
Pz~efW
299)
Flak
tanks
(228)
Total number
vehicles
390
190
(5705)
Stu
Gesch
anid
Jagclpz
IV
892
533
(6054)
Assault tank
32
15
( 188)
Jagdpz V
66
43
( 208)
Jagdpz VI
28
I21
(
51))
Total number of Jagdpz and
1018
.612
(6501)
Stu Ge sch
1Nashorn
(?ako/SfJ.
with 88
mm
12
8
(
141)
cannon)
Total number of Pz Kpfw,
MS
#
P-059
3. TANK LOSSES AND I fLACBMirT
a, In principle the repairing of tanks was carried out as close
to the
frontas possible,
The
repairservices
accompanied
thetroops
to
the
combat area, as far as enem~y fire permitted..TLhe
motor officers of the tank battalions accompanied the repair services to the combat area and directed their employment there. In this manner these officers were able personally to survey losses and damages.Daiaged tanks which could not be repaired with the means available
to the field forces were collected by recovery vehicles and turned
over to the repair companies of the tank regiments or to other repair
services. In the evening, battalions or regiments were informed as
to the number of tanks ready for action, the number in need of minor repairs, the number in need of major repairs and total losses. These
figures were reported through command channels (adjutant to Ia branch at divisional headquarters and from there to Is. branch at corps head-quarters, etc.), as well as through traffic control channels (regimental
motor officer to divisional motor officer). This short standardized report was transmitted by telephone or radio, and from division to higher echelons usually by teletype.
These
daily reports were supplemented by a monthly report throughtraffic control channels in which the daily reports were compiled
and, if necessary, corrected and completed by means of accurate and detailed accounts covering damages and causes. These reports were
MS
+
p-O59
at the Army High Command, who in turn, submitted them to interested
agencies in the Army High Command for further evaluation~
b0 Total losses are compiled in Appendix 2 and are broken down by month and according to tank types beginning with
May
1941,These losses comprise all losses at the front,. regardless of
whether they occurred in combat through enemy action, were occasioned
by vehicles, falling into enemy hands in damaged or undamaged condit
ion or were the result of "canibalization". of damaged vehicles to
make others fully serviceable,*
Temporary
losses (damages) are not considered in Appendix 2.During the latter part of, the War, 95 percent of damages were
repaired by the field forces, and at least 95 percent of these within
the tank regiment, while only about 5 percent of the damages were
repaired in repair shops in the Zone of the Interior,. In this
connect-ion see also the following;
Performance
of the Tank Re airServices
aa
At
the front, ie, the' tank repair shop companies of theregiments, armies and army groups, exclusive of repair services in companies, etc~:
Reductions in number because of sales to foreign countries, transfers to agencies outside the Wehrmacht and total loss in the Replacement Army have not been considered. These are so small, however, that they would not have affected the statistics to an appreciable extent,
MS
P -059
*1P
Month
Pz
II-VI
Stu Gesch
Pak/ Sfl
Total
Motors
Oct 43
973
652
.200
1825
143
Nov
911
698
195
1804
216
Dec
1294
873
224
2391
2831
Jan
*44
2190
1111
938
4239
228
Total
10259
bb.
Zone of the Interior:
Oct 43
62
22
45
129
1Nov.
90
19
36
145
Dec
57
41
30
128
Jan 44
71
91
39
201
Total
603
C.
It was
impossible
to prepare
a breakdown of losses
according to cause.
d~.
Estimation
of tank losses and replacement
Up
to the beginning of the 1941
Rissian
campaign,
the course of
the War was rather abnormal on
the
German side because
consumption
of materie1 occurred almost
exclusively
during the short
periods
the campaigns (Poland~, Norway, France, Yugoslavia/Greece) lasted.
This
made it. possible, in spite of low -production, to increase the stocks of
war materiel whichi were very
limited
at
the
beginninz
of the
War
during
v S
#
p-059the long intervals between the campaigns, so that, in the summer
of 1941, sufficient forces were at hand for the difficult task ahead.,
For production data see Appendix 3,
In spite of very low production of Pz Xpfw and Stu Gesch, it had
been possible to increase the number of tank divisions from ten to
twenty during the period oaf twelve months
between
the end of theFrench campaign and the beginning of the Russian campaign, Some
of the tank divisions, however, had only two battalions instead of
the customary four, Su.bseqyuently, they were to have been brought up
to full strength,
Aside from 4200 Pz Kpfw, at the beginning of the Russian campaign
there
was
as a result of this situation, practically no reserve avail.,able. Monthly production amounted to only 260 Pz Kpfw, but it was
increasing, The Army High Command viewed this development with great
concern but had been unable to step up production, N~evertheless, the
Army High Command believed that it could risk being aole to meet
re-quirements for the campaign against Russia. It hoped to be able to
replenish losses from current production, especially since it erroneously
believed that operations on a large scale were impossible in Russia
during
the
winter.Approximately 3800 Pz Kpfw were expected to roll off production
lines from the beginning of the camipaign, in June, 1940, to the end of
Mays, 1942, i.e. prior to the beginning of furtner large operations in
that year,
At first actual production came up to expectations, Losses during
~jS P
p-059
the summer of 1941,1900 tanks up to the end of October, were high but could have been met by current production without difficulty
if two unexpected events had not complicated the situation:
a.
The fighting continued unabated during the wintermonths,
b, The superiority in armament of the Russian T 34 tanks, which appeared in ever-increasing numbers, neutralized the lightly
armed
German
tank models on the battleield, with the result that the latter had to be withdrawn and replaced by new models equippedwith better cannon, (Of. Appendix 1),
In
preparation of the big summer offensive. of1942,
in which themajority of our tank units was to participate, tanks were withdrawn from battle in spite of the fact that doing so involved great risks. Thiese were completely re-equipped so that approximately 2500 Pz Kpfw
could be conmmitted in this operation alone.
From the beginning of the campaign of 1941 up to the start of the summer offensive on 1 July 1942, approximate losses of 3850 Pz Kpfww
were offset by the production of 4100 tanks. However, an additional
number of over 1000 tanks must be added to the losses, since these tanks were no longer fit for service at the front,
The Stu Gesch and the PakfSf1 have so far not been taken into consideration. The Stu Geech was at that time a comparatively new weapon, still in the development stage, and had to undergo extensive tests at the front. Its production surpassed losses to a considerable
IVS
fp-059
-2
campaign increased to 780 by 1 July
1942.
These
weapons
did not
increase
the fighting power of the tank divisions, but that of the
infantry divisions.
D~endices 5 and 6 show comparative production
and loss figures,
The Pak/
Sf1
was introduced in the spring of 1942
to fill
the production in the Armored
Command.
This was a, temporary
emergency solution, designed to increase antitank fighting power at
the front. If these vehicles are included in the estimate, a more
favorable picture develops,
as
shown by the following statistics:
remd
for
action
1
Jul 41
lD
ec
4l
lkiar42
1
Jul42
1 Jan43
Pz Kpfw
4278.
4084
2468
3471
4364
Stu Gesch
416
598
625
780
1155
Pakf Sf1
--306
1124
Total
4694
4682
3093
4557
6643
The heavy destruaction of tank forces
a new phase,9
Here, as
well
as
during the
losses increased immensely.
From
January
to the followings
at Stalingrad introduced
ensuing retrograde.
battles,
to
April 1943 they amounted
2945
Pz
Kpfw,
461 Stu Gesch,
426 Pak/
Sfl1
-22-MS
#
p-059The strength of the Pz
Kpfw
ready for action thus againdecreas-ed to 2500 during this period, The fact that, as a result of the
Stalingrad defeat, the initiative had passed to the enemy now also
became evident in the field of materiel, Only by conducting the War
on an economical basis would it have been possible in 1943 to regain
this initiative,*
This,
the German command, however, could not decideto do,
The Stalingrad mistake was soon followed by another. The
un-successful summer offensive of 1943 at Orel-Kursk (Uitadele'"l),
with the retreats following upon it after July 1943, was again very
costly in tank losses, This is shown in Appendix
2
ahd in thegraphic
chats in bend~es 4 and 5,j
Due to the fact that Hitler continuously ordered activation of
new tank units necessary rehabilitation of units was impeded in spite
of a considerable increase in production, The result was that the
available tanks were distributed over an ever-increasing number of
tank
units, and this consequently affected the fighting power ofthese units, It was only in the spring of 1944, that the number of
available tanks again increased appreciably, so that, for exanple, in l4arch, 1944, the tank strength as of January 1943, was again
attained, At the beginning of July, 1944,, the number of available tanks reached its wartime peak with 5800 vehicles,
(Cf.
Appendix 4), However, due to the overtaxing of tank forces which. had occurred earlier,MS
:
p-059
the increase in materiel was counterbalanced by a decrease in
train-ed personnel, so that the fighting power of these forces was no
longer commensurate with the number of tanks available. A steady increase in losses was the result. The high losses in tanks suffered
during the battles after the invasion of France and during the retreats
in Russia could be met to a certain extent by increased production;
as illustrated by A endice - 3 and the graphic chart in Appendix 7.
Developments in the field of assault guns and Jagdpanzers were more favorable, due to the fact that their requirements in materiel
and'
labor were considerably lower than those for tanks, so that itwas
easier to increase
production,
In conclusion, and judging by the course of events after 144, it may be regarded as an established fact that although tanks were subject
to almost continuous commitment, the strength of the German tank
forces could be maintained at a fixed level by monthly production of
10 15 'percent of its over-all strength, A prerequisite for this, however, is that the tank forces have a repair service at their dis-posal to take care of all
small
and average repairs within the unitsthemselves. A sufficient supply of snare parts and interchangeable
units must be made available to unit repair installations to insure
Quick repair of damages sustained, Unless repair installations are
able to work efficiently, the number of total losses quickly increases,
e, Tank production was guided through the following channels:
organizational plans, filed a request with the General Army Office
for the further development of the tank arm, For the purpose of
establish-ing a pattern, this request took into consideration a long period of time (several years).
The
General Army Office in turn worked out this reauest in detailand forwarded it
to the Army Ordnance Office, In case it should be impossible for these three offices of the Army High Command to attain a uniform conception,the
Commander inChief of the Army had to
make
the decision. The Army Ordnance Office integrated the resulting plan into its over-all armament plan, whichhad to be approved by the Wehrmacht High Command, Tnereafter the Ordnance Office had to insure that everything proceeded according to
plan±, The industrial output necessary to attain the goal either
already existed or had to be created, During the course of the
War the authority of the agencies involved shifted as a result of
the creation of a Miinistry for
Armaments
anda.
Office of Chief of Army Equipment, With the dissolution of the post of Commander inChief of the
Army
and the assumption of its fuanctions by the Chief of the Wehrmacht High Comu and and Hitler himself - particularlysince Hitler showed increased interest in all questions pertaining to armaments authority shifted more and more to the Fuehrer.
For 1940, prior to the French campaign, the monithly production
quota for tanks
and assault
guns was established at 600; this goalwas to be attained in
1943,
At the beginning of 1940) productionwas still considerably below 200, At the beginning of the Russian campaign the figure
wias
300. The increase in tank divisions from ten25-
u26-to twenty, beginning with the autumn of 1A940, led to a revision
of the monthly production quota of 600 tanks.
The
result was ademand to raise the monthly production quota of tanks and assault
guns to 1250, This reqies ,in January, 1941, fulfillment of which was dependent on the building of new production centers, was opposed by the Minister of Armaments, Todt, The latter regarded the demands
as exaggerated and impossible to satisfy by German industry, He
obtained an order from the Wehrmacht High Command, Keitel, which
prohibited. an increase over the old quota of 600, For the time being, the Army High Command was' satisfied with this decision and
oelieved that it would be able to conduct the campaign against Russia
without the increase, The considerations which motivated this attitude
have been mentioned above,
In January, 1942, the Chief of the Ordnance Oftice again
presented
the Arnlrls requirements, 1250 tanks and assault guns per month, to
the Minister of Armaments. In the meantime, however, there had been high losses in tanks in the past during the winter, further activation
of tank divisions had been ordered by Hitler, activation of tank units
tor the SS had started and the demands for assault guns
had
increasedby leaps and bounds. The inister of Armaments presented the
recuire-ments to Hitler, who failed to make a decision, since he was for the
moment favorably impressed by events at the front and relied upon the effect of the more efficient antitank guns whose employment wa s imminent,
This made him doubt the future of the tank forces,
In response to renewed pressure by the Chief of the Ordnance
MS + P059
Office
von Speer, Minister of Armaments, in July 1942, Hitlerfinally was compelled to make a decision, He now exceeded the
origin-el. demand. made by the Army and ordered a monthly production of 1450tanks and assault guns, The steps which were immediately taken
to increase production and to fill the new quota began to show re-sults in the spring of 1943, as shown in the
graphic
charts inA joences 5 and 60
In order to meet the reauested increases in production it was
necessary to coordinate production of a great many factories of
various kinds, especially as a large number of plants shared in
the production of the following parts: Tank hulls.
Tracks
and bogie wheels.Motors,
Gears,Turrets,
Armament.Optical
instruments,Ammunition,
etc,
In addition, frequent changes in tank types, armament, etc,,
which occurre.during the War, had to be considered, It was the mission
of the Ordnance Office and, later, the Ministry of Armaments constantly to coordinate production orders and the capacity of the manufacturing
plants by allocating manpower, etc, The fact
that
tnis was to agreat extent achieved in the face of great difficulties and in spite
-27-1s
P-059
of the air war is shown in A nni
n
h
rpi
hrsi
Arnendi es
5 and 6_,
The air
attacks
were successfully minimized
by
transferring
proOduction centers to areas in less danger and particularly by
de-centralising
prodtuction,
It was not until the end of 1944
that
the air war affected production.
so severely that there was a
cow~
siderable
drop in production,
*) a csaul t guns and Tank
destroyirs readfo
1)
Te&F
A N A
E
Asaul i-u:xe
&vrd
Tank Destroyers
front
uie.
Ld
for
1ppendi
x
1
{3)
Antitwangun
on self-
"Illa.e1
.
~rop.led
mount.
t
rnt
Ttma
S
3t
z
1.1
(F)
35(t)
38(t)
III
Fahrge8tell
I
II
II/III
35(t)
38(t)
III
-Tank
gun Tank
Tank
guia
Tank
*
a f
f
e
M. G.
2 c:
rohr
37c~37c
,
WepnMachine.
Z=t
Flame-
477mm
37mm
Kw
K..
L
6o
gun
Ta-
thrower
5
cm~
Kw.K.
IV
IV
V
Panthf~j
Iv
Iv
Iv
v
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
= 11fl A7 lfn~fl
- n5cm
7,.5
L6
L 24
Kw.
K.
75mm
=L
42
7.5
colun
: 7zawand
____ ___ ____ ___ ____ ___ ____ ___ 50 Eam
1,9.193 9
1445
12233
--98
1.4.1940
10c21075
7
143
23e
329
1., 11079
955
871
X26
KwK.
7,5L
43
u.48
Pak-7,9J
L 70
75mm
it;" "
7.5
L 70
75mm
VI
VI
Tiger Tiger
Flak
Pz
b
c-III
Pz.
Bef. Wten
VI
VI
36(t)
I-VI
3
Tsnk fTack
IV
*)armored i
ain co
d
9WUL
-K . X. -Kam.
K.
Flak
very ch.
~.
, ,8
2 cm
T0m
arious
L
56
L
71
2cm
Vier-83mm
86mm
uln
63,7
cmn3?min
3
cia;6w
i
-9 10 11 '*1'ecov r
TOTAL
T
TStu.c
--Summer~f
Stu. G.
III/
Stu. H. Stu.
Jagd-ITT-TV
-0 W-9 d), etrZeilen
I-
der
III/
f rontfac-
:III IV
zhe hieeilQlYuns
Pzspf.w.
K.XW.K.
1-16
tanks
7,5
'7,
ready
L24 L48
for use tank tank
gun
75.i:3~X
i~4 L48
38/
ICIIV
IV
H.
1©,5
L 28
H.
Pak
15cm
7,5
H. ak
Pak
Pak Pak
15cm7.58,
,
8,5
12,6
L
12 L 48
L71
L71
L55
antitank
an-tank -
88 mm
tank
4=DaA-tI
e 1IPk/ 11
Is-Jagd-
fart tiger
um
:3 1.horn
" s nthprder
Pe C/ ' 1.
* ).front-firers
.III/
V
VI
VI
Ze ilea,
f
aeh.
19
-2-pz.
7!5
U.7,bo2
8,8
L '71
rn .IL1719
2021
22 22,
I .-L.2o:.
barreled
2O0n
ifour-
215
243
3195
'U
~~30
mm double-T-86
6
3195
88mm
5
5
defLW
Tot lb.
th
Totl-o
th
i aen
ter.27,
31
der
-rj~zs
7'eila
28,
31
2~ii3365
i r '
33n.5
2001751
179187:
189
191,
1911
191
Ii
c#.ti'520
570
636
686
754
763
661
543
547
528
;-L. U.1015
1110
1200
1323
1440
1501
1479
1571
1646
1784
orbarrled
453
476
459
499
517
533.
488
470
499
485
2441
232
260
286
308
330
331
331
335
328
315
4368
4467
4714
4650
4956
5264
5310
4989
4737
4874
T
4y{/f/1/lClj4993
2 01'
491
522
521
454
479
479
436
375
3)34
19W
893
16S6
2068
2306
24,"82
2457
2626
2630
2767
9)'701.513
530
534
661
723
761
842
901
307
289
278
273
26 9
264
266
255
257
256
257
4896
4828
4"62
4802
5082
5385
5663
5673
5903
5839
5973
4178
4317
4539
3685
3 943
4200
4278
4029
3904
4002
4085
2738
2695
2468
2718
2 946
3251
34,1
3473
3736
3760
3 941
1654
227
240292
31c~
377
416
461
479
508
566
625
605
625
637
697
780
831
873
907
966
U 1 10L. . I0iu
... -. t TYCL12;7
252
242
126
t,197~
204
212j
2C5
I260j
_2h
91
4.t - 4-- - -- 114 -7122 7
I
2271
2291
22
1.11.-
- -52()
1.2.
L54
*
1
r2944
1077
2762
1130
LIU34+
9
4211
-65
4
21
22
263428
524
6o1
6 75
783
912
1084
1205
1339
1617
1649
2105
2067
216 0
179;1.
1729
575
19-2
001964
85
lo
127
165
191
240
261
284
299
34 9
X95
41.
499
556
551
631
511
253
245
243
:_45
1 85
5
6
12
31
55
101
175
142
145
121
140
141
141
141
141
11
1
1.1
185
207
278
280
252
317
324
359
412
430
461
509
507
477
464
46/0
475
48
520
5119
541
573
326
307
3 27
12
11
}0
40
-n066
74
74
115-127
138
147
1
97
311
1,
21
41±oo
6036
529
18L
£00 ~LI. 1 '~
1~I
UA~ .L'I.~J ~lU52k9
577
1
~9
- 7LL5648
5463
4149
3797
3643
4001
4536
4379
4328
4991
5157
5266
5543
5883
6479
6468
7141
7447
7059
7180
5396
4364
4261
3177
2_960
2504
2900
3452
2547
2672
2986
3227
354'
3863
4 207
4
s16
4 823
5461
5307
5486
45%4
471
1146
1232
111
135
;943
1421216
142 1452
1401
1573
161716
±61683
16191
1818
S187
193 .1945
1911 2077
20-721415
204
2071
2071
204
228
225
2358
2401
2804
3026
2696
2655
2768
2859
9
12
5
20
56
109
136
1483
146
1?1
106
10VV 7V.0. tf . sjw 4vn97
11.9
182
175
210
272
2%6
335
42
487
466
227
227
256
256
292
29316
31-377
377
41o
416
461
4b1
479
479
50,
50,~
5o6
566
my '15.;t ti iU0v f1625
625
605
605
625
625
-623
623
-637
637
128
6 97
007
270
780
780
306,
831
831-
4 0
873
873
60C,
907
97
630
975
975
850
loiPr. 10LW..
980
20
60
6o
43
43
43
44
31
58
111
128
138
112
152
154
171
173
29
85
89
50
50
504-422
'0
4- w A
49
101
173
238
410
504
753
8bt7
1039
12868
14
27
37
49
65
85
92
183
219
256
228
320
505
6284
299
5206
1696
5582
5670
22
35 01
3607
573
188
1475
57?
1
-.1646
149
47
46
46
44
41
41
37
14
12
1155
124
90$8
1183
1612
1-79
1954
2091
208;
2209
2313
2 494
3010
301 6
3184
3731
4167
3938
4259
4864
.u
17
6107
6317
1155
774
1048
14~70
1737
1314
1955
1087
2018
2120
2300
2803
2814
2987
3524
3960
3751
4055
4409
4659
5942
0
2
93
L
11 4
1222
10o63
8d9
840
E12
971
1110
1105
1102
1277w 250
1527rr
w rw+ i r
_ L Lrs.
1314
1361
1353
1205
1241
1160
851
774
608
596
128
27C
306
600
850
-112.4.
-1222
6)
1069
31
920
73
°13110
922
131
1102
173
1283
179
12x,
180
1tI-82
211
1301
26
248
230225
238
216
191
20)
129139
1569
1575
1600
1583
11130
14i~2
13 7u
1042
979
737
735)
541
1
5
730o
Without
(*)
ohne
Pz
III
;.; ,
i Wth
K,.KC.
37nm
R ar_
e
t bL
:U
nicht mehr £:'ontfaeThi ;, sondern nur' noch zu~r Verwenduni8
Im
{Siheru Tdes
t
hin~ter der F
1ront und zur
Ausbildung
iz &'sataheer geeignet.
Figuxres framed in~ Red indcicate vehiles
wnich
could no longer be used at the front
but only in the security
service
behind
the lines
and
for training troops in the
Replacement Armyr.
TYF
Carrisage
1.2.
1.3.
1.41.
1.,.
1.6.
1..
1.9.
1.10.
1.11.
1]
1023
78
877
843
771
642
717
17LI
984
994
1019
1042
1072
1067
9E5S
900
896
85
86
86
1.?.
1.3.
1
44.
1.5.
1.6.
1.7.
1.6.
[.g.
1.10.
1.11,
1.1L.
708
693
708
701
092
692
692
~0
8 101
6o
907{
97('
11021f
1.2.
1. .
1.1.
1.3j.
1.6.
1.7.
10.10.
950
730
350
236
218
20?~
x.33
100103
1014
105
93
75
62
WlX714
54
1
'
5726
5450
5216
53b2
5.559
44
47',5
5977
4251
4577
46
94
4490
4383
4510
4u11
1.11.
1.3.
1.2.
1.3.
1. . 1* g..1,10.
7399
".1J
41
42
30
27
27
1L
11
11
1
ii
5521
5433
5087
5425
5647
6352
6749
6964
7376
7426
784
I7C - c12--1.1 "79 27
7929
6334
5585
5739
6535
7517
7616
7703
83jo,
8747
940~
9612
10502
110b 0
11082
12311
.129905
1b1
1063
11015
13176
1r,283
X363
3300
3093
3341
3711
4218
4557
4764
5209
534;7
576
6643
6727
5362
4254
4465
5292
6291.
5644
5911
6155
7,33
7743
8619
9 13
9240
10484
11143
1.0-79
10639
9740
10187
-S 1hAtJA1L3h9
Coluan : III IV - 9 t y P--W-W-i.nr i r-..__ -..- -. c.--~ r _T>nir 17_ 18_ i --- ' . - - -M f the Recove y 1... ._, o-,,a e, r- ^f r'*7 I3?K :C: raw
. ., , 5y I t A ^, J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 J 3 I 1 1 1 1 U--a-J 1