Traffic Light Coordination - Impacts on mobility
Roma Servizi per la Mobilità S.r.l.
Rome Mobility Agency Marco Cianfano
Consortium Meeting Madrid
2013 May, 8th
Key issue
• The context
• Mobility Planning in Rome
• Present vs Mid term scenario
• ICT Emissions: case study overview
• Traffic survey – ICT on and off
• Preliminary Results
The context: Rome
City of Rome
Province of Rome
Municipal Area 1.285 skm Population
Metr. Area 4.300.000 City residents 2.900.000 Road Network km 5.000
Main road network km. 800
Vehicles 2.650.000
cars 1.890.000
2 wheels 600.000 goods delivery 160.000
Daily Trips 6.100.000 Peak-hour Trips 560.000
Management of the Mobility – 5 concentric zones with increasing constraints
Zone 5: Municipality Area – 1285 km2 Emission Check “Blue Label”
(yearly all vehicles and PTWs)
Zone 4: External Ring (GRA) – 344 km2 Tourist Coaches Regulation
Zone 3: Green Belt –154 km2 Pollution emergencies, Multi-modal nodes, Park&ride
Zone 2: Rail Ring – 48.4 km2
Emission restrictions, Pay parking schemes Zone 1: LTZ – 5.5 km2
Stop to all vehicles (except permit holders) Pedestrian – 0.5 km2
Zero Emission Area (walking & electric)
Rome Socio-Economic Structure
Residents Workers
Socio-economic Density Residents + Workers / ha)
Rome Road Network
Rome Public Transport Network
Transport Line Length n°
Km stops
Metro 37 48
Tramway 39 188
Urban Railway 58 47
Railways(2) 152 42
Corridors 32
(2) In the Metropolitan area
TOTAL 318
The Modal Shift in Rome
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60% Public
Transport Private vehicles PTW
Pedestrian
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50% Public
Transport Private vehicles PTW
Pedestrian
METROPOLITAN AREA
OLD TOWN - CITY CENTRE
Rome PT Network
MID TERM SCENARIO Transport Line Extensions:
+32 km Metro lines
• Line B north to Casal Monastero
• Line B1 to Jonio
• Line C to San Giovanni
+90km Corridors
Il numero di spostamenti dello scenario futuro tiene conto dell’aumento previsto in termini di residenti nel Comune di Roma
Present
scenario (%) Mid term
Scenario (%)
Modal shift differences
(%)
Modal shift differences
Vehicle 287.940 50,9 289.750 50,0 -0,8 1.810
Motorbike 89.000 15,7 89.320 15,4 -0,3 320
Public
transport 155.760 27,6 166.530 28,8 +1,2 10.770
Feet 32.640 5,8 33.050 5,7% -0,1 410
Sum 565.340 100 578.650 100 - 13.310
The new modal shift – morning peak hour – ROME
Present vs Short term scenario
CO2 Emission (tons/year)
ICT EMISSIONS
Development of a methodology and tool to evaluate the impact of ICT measures on road
transport emissions
Objectives and Rome case study
Type of ICT/ITS
Traffic Management with particular regards to Traffic Lights Optimization
Rome case study - Overview
23 TRAFFIC LIGHTS (under UTC system: plan
selection scheme)
Itinerary of 6,1 km
Urban Road: 2000/4000 veh/h
Rome case study - Survey
UTC OFF UTC
ON
UTC ON
2013, April 9th 2013, April 10th 2013, April 11th
- 6 hours/day
- Morning Peak (7:30/9:30)
- Afternoon Off peak (12:30/14:30) - Afternoon Peak (17:30/19:30)
- 2 vehicles with GPS and Engine/fuel monitor systems
- Fiat Punto
- Fiat Panda 1.3 MJ
- Survey Numbers:
- 67 trips
- 410 travelled km
Rome case study – Traffic flows
0 50 100 150 200 250
0.00 0.30 1.00 1.30 2.00 2.30 3.00 3.30 4.00 4.30 5.00 5.30 6.00 6.30 7.00 7.30 8.00 8.30 9.00 9.30 10.00 10.30 11.00 11.30 12.00 12.30 13.00 13.30 14.00 14.30 15.00 15.30 16.00 16.30 17.00 17.30 18.00 18.30 19.00 19.30 20.00 20.30 21.00 21.30 22.00 22.30 23.00 23.30 0.00
Number of Vehicles [veh/5 mins.]
Time of the Day
09/04/2013 10/04/2013 11/04/2013 0
50 100 150 200 250 300
0.00 0.30 1.00 1.30 2.00 2.30 3.00 3.30 4.00 4.30 5.00 5.30 6.00 6.30 7.00 7.30 8.00 8.30 9.00 9.30 10.00 10.30 11.00 11.30 12.00 12.30 13.00 13.30 14.00 14.30 15.00 15.30 16.00 16.30 17.00 17.30 18.00 18.30 19.00 19.30 20.00 20.30 21.00 21.30 22.00 22.30 23.00 23.30 0.00
Number of Vehicles [veh/5 mins.]
Time of the Day
09/04/2013 10/04/2013 11/04/2013
Similar traffic level over the three days of survey, in both directions (city centre and GRA)
Effects of UTC off can be read without considering traffic conditions
CITY CENTRE
GRA
Rome case study – Preliminary
results
Rome case study – Preliminary
results
Rome case study – Preliminary
results
Time (min) Avg Speed (km/h)
Idle time (v < 3 km/h)
No
stops ICT
27.3 26.5 8.9 501.0 OFF
23.8 29.0 7.2 387.2 ON
Time (min) Avg Speed (km/h)
Idle time (v < 3 km/h)
No
stops ICT
31.7 22,5 10,7 570.0 OFF
21.5 30.5 5.6 306.9 ON
Rome case study – Preliminary results
OFF ON
OFF ON
- UTC off - effects:
+ 30% N. Stops + 10% Avg Speed
- UTC off - effects:
+ 85% N. Stops + 35% Avg Speed
Time (min) Avg Speed (km/h)
Idle time (v < 3 km/h)
No
stops ICT
18.8 35.2 5.1 282 OFF
17.5 35.8 3.8 211 ON
Time (min) Avg Speed (km/h)
Idle time (v < 3 km/h)
No
stops ICT
18.1 34.6 4.0 213 OFF
19.8 33.9 5.3 286 ON
Rome case study – Preliminary results
OFF ON
OFF ON
- UTC off - effects:
+ 33% N. Stops - 2% Avg Speed
- UTC off - effects:
- 25% N. Stops - 2% Avg Speed
ITS in Rome – UTT (Urban Travel Times)
Targa: CC 555 AA 14-apr-12 11:50:39
Targa: CC 555 AA 14-apr-12 12:11:48 CC 555 AA
CC 555 AA
PLATE RECOGNISED AND TIME RECORDED AT THE ENTRY SECTION
PLATE RECOGNISED AND TIME RECORDED AT THE EXIT SECTION
TRAVEL TIME 21 mins 9 secs
Roma Servizi per la Mobilità Madrid, 8th-10thMay 2013
Via Appia UTT Sections
Roma Servizi per la Mobilità Madrid, 8th-10thMay 2013
0 5 10 15 20 25
6.00 6.30 7.00 7.30 8.00 8.30 9.00 9.30 10.00 10.30 11.00 11.30 12.00
AVERAGE TRAVEL TIME [minutes]
Time of the Day
09/04/13 10/04/13 11/04/13 UTC ON
UTC OFF UTC ON
TUE WED
THU
Via Appia UTT Sections
Roma Servizi per la Mobilità Madrid, 8th-10thMay 2013
Via Appia UTT Sections
Roma Servizi per la Mobilità Madrid, 8th-10thMay 2013
0 5 10 15 20 25
6.00 6.30 7.00 7.30 8.00 8.30 9.00 9.30 10.00 10.30 11.00 11.30 12.00
AVERAGE TRAVEL TIME [minutes]
Time of the Day
09/04/13 10/04/13 11/04/13 UTC ON
UTC OFF UTC ON
TUE WED THU
Road works on the section that reduced carriageway
from 2 lanes to 1
0 5 10 15 20 25
6.00 6.30 7.00 7.30 8.00 8.30 9.00 9.30 10.00 10.30 11.00 11.30 12.00
AVERAGE TRAVEL TIME [minutes]
Time of the Day
09/04/13 10/04/13 11/04/13
0 5 10 15 20 25
6.00 6.30 7.00 7.30 8.00 8.30 9.00 9.30 10.00 10.30 11.00 11.30 12.00
AVERAGE TRAVEL TIME [minutes]
Time of the Day
09/04/13 10/04/13 11/04/13
Different traffic flow conditions on sections
Internal section: urban
External section: suburban
Different efficiency of UTC measures
Roma Servizi per la Mobilità Madrid, 8th-10thMay 2013
UTC measures - Effects on traffic
Incidents events that produced heavy congestion on Rome’s Ring Road (GRA)
Roma Servizi per la Mobilità Madrid, 8th-10thMay 2013
0 5 10 15 20 25
6.00 6.30 7.00 7.30 8.00 8.30 9.00 9.30 10.00 10.30 11.00 11.30 12.00
AVERAGE TRAVEL TIME [minutes]
Time of the Day
09/04/13 10/04/13 11/04/13 12/04/13 UTC ON
UTC OFF UTC ON INCIDENTS
TUE WED
THU FRI
UTC measures - Effects on traffic
Roma Servizi per la Mobilità Madrid, 8th-10thMay 2013
Rome case study – Preliminary conclusions
- Important effects on travel times and speed - Stop and go effect increases
- More the traffic flow is high more the UTC effetcs is important (platoon effects??)
- Fuel consumption???