• No results found

Judicial Branch Overview

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Judicial Branch Overview"

Copied!
24
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

1

Judicial Branch Overview

Kristina Pickering, Chief Justice

James Hardesty, Justice

Senate Judiciary Committee

February, 2013

Staff Contact: John McCormick 775-687-9813

[email protected]

EXHIBIT G Senate Committee on Judiciary Date: 2-5-2013 Page: 1 of 24

(2)

Judicial Branch

Article 3, Section 1, of the Nevada Constitution

The powers of the Government of the State of Nevada shall be divided

into three separate departments,—the Legislative,—the Executive and

the Judicial...

Article 6, Section 1, of the Nevada Constitution

The judicial power of this State shall be vested in a court system,

(3)

3

Judicial Branch Organization

Judicial Branch Generally, NRS Chapter 1

The Constitution provides for

the establishment of the

Judicial Branch. The Judicial

Branch resolves both public

and private disputes by

applying laws established

through the legislative

process and based upon

prior state Supreme Court

decisions. Nevada has a

non-unified court system.

Supreme Court

Article 3, Sec. 1 Article 6, Sec. 1, 2, 3, 4, &

19

NRS Chapter 2

District Court Article 6, Sec. 5 & 6

NRS Chapter 3 Justice Court Article 6, Sec. 8 NRS Chapter 4 Municipal Court Article 6, Sec. 9 NRS Chapter 5 G 3

(4)

Judicial Branch Revenue

Total Biennial Funding - $119,469,701

$63,631,043 53% $824,538 1% $55,014,120 46%

General Fund Appropriation Distribution

• 67% Judicial Elected Official Salaries • 16% to the Supreme Court

• 7% to the Judicial Retirement System • 5% to the Law Library

• 3% to the Senior Judge Program • 2% Judicial Programs

• 1% Other (Foreclosure Mediation & Judicial Selection)

General Fund

Admin Assess & Other Fees

Federal

The Judicial Branch general fund appropriation is 1% of the total general fund

appropriation contained in the Executive Budget. When comparing the Judicial Branch budget to all funding sources in the

Executive Budget, the Judicial Branch receives .6% of all funding sources.

(5)

Supreme Court Duties

Administer the Nevada judicial system

Decide all civil and criminal cases appealed

from District Court

Exercise extraordinary writ review - writs of

mandamus, certiorari, prohibition, quo

warranto,

and habeas corpus

Licensure and discipline of lawyers

Appellate review for judicial discipline

5

(6)

Supreme Court Cases Filed and Disposed

Projections for the 2013 – 2015 Biennium

FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13* FY 14* FY 15*

New Cases Filed 2,266 2,395 2,500 2,625 2,756 2,894 Cases Resolved 2,419 2,220 2,270 2,270 2,270 2,270 Cases Pending 1,514 1,689 1,919 2,274 2,760 3,384

*Projections for cases filed and cases pending include a 5% increase each year

• It took 112 years – from statehood on October 31, 1864 until August 12, 1977 – for the first 10,000 cases to be filed in the Nevada Supreme Court.

• Over the next 30 years – from 1977 to August 13, 2007 – 40,000 more cases were files, 10,000 of which were filed between 2002-2007.

(7)

7

Supreme Court

Cases Decided in Calendar Year 2012

Numbers Disposed in Calendar Year 2012 by Case Category

(8)

Nevada Supreme Court Caseload

(9)

9

District Courts

Article 6, Sec. 5 & 6; NRS Chapter 3

 10 judicial districts, 17 county courts  82 judges of general jurisdiction  Jurisdiction -

Preside over cases of felony and gross misdemeanor crimes; civil matters above $10,000; and family law cases, including juvenile crimes (exclusive), abuse, and neglect. Conduct jury and non-jury trials. Rule on legal issues. Hear appeals of Justice and Municipal Court cases.

 Funding Source

 District Judges’ salaries –

State General Fund Appropriation

 Staff, facilities, & operations –

County General Fund and Civil Filing Fees

District Court Case Filings, 2012

Criminal Civil Family Juvenile

15,481 30,770 69,328 11,788

Total Case Filings: 127,367

District Court Case Dispositions, 2012

Criminal Civil Family Juvenile

16,830 36,320 64,620 13,736

Total Case Dispositions: 131,506

(10)

Senior Judge Program

Senior Judge Program places retired district judges

(currently 22 active seniors) to hear cases in district

court due to judicial absence, disqualification,

vacancy, or another reason

In 2012 the senior judges provided the service of an

equivalent of 8 full time district judges, saving

millions of dollars and expediting cases that could

have languished in the backlog

Senior judges also conduct settlement hearings in

the Clark County Family Court resulting in speedier

resolution of these cases

(11)

11

Justice Courts

Article 6, Sec. 8; NRS Chapter 4

67 judgeships

Courts of limited jurisdiction

Jurisdiction: Preside over preliminary matters of felony and

gross misdemeanor cases, traffic and other misdemeanor

cases, civil matters up to $10,000, small claims (up to $7,500),

and landlord tenant disputes. Issue temporary protective orders

and warrants.

In fiscal year 2011, non-traffic cases filed – 214,923; and traffic

cases filed – 363,185

In fiscal year 2012, non-traffic cases filed – 192,129; and traffic

cases filed – 370,279

Funding source: County General Fund

9 judges serve as both Justice of the Peace and Municipal

Court Judge

(12)

Municipal Courts

Article 6, Sec. 9; NRS Chapter 5

30 judgeships Court of limited jurisdiction

Jurisdiction: Preside over misdemeanor and traffic

cases in incorporated communities; limited civil

jurisdiction

In fiscal year 2011, non-traffic cases filed – 62,735;

and traffic cases filed – 203,310

In fiscal year 2012, non-traffic cases filed – 54,147;

and traffic charges filed – 185,046

Funding source: City General Fund

9 judges serve as both Justice of the Peace and

(13)

13

Specialty Courts

 44 Specialty Courts programs throughout Nevada.

 1,541 participant successfully graduated from specialty court programs in

FY2012

 60 drug-free babies born to participants  Funding in the next biennium:

 $7 specialty court administrative assessment (NRS 176.0613)  Felony bond forfeitures (10% to Specialty Courts, NRS

178.518)

 12% of the Judicial Branch share of general administrative assessment revenue (NRS 176.059)

 Total Specialty Court Revenue in FY 2012: $5,631,309

(14)

Specialty Courts by Region

 Western Region

 Western Regional Adult Drug Court (5 programs)  Carson City & Storey County Juvenile Drug Court  Carson City Felony DUI Court

 Carson City Mental Health Court

 Washoe Region

 Second Judicial District

 Adult Drug Court  Family Drug Court  Felony DUI Court  Juvenile Drug Court  Mental Health Court  Veterans Court

 Reno Justice Court Alcohol and Drug Court  Sparks Municipal Court Alcohol and Drug Court  Reno Municipal Court Alcohol and Drug Court (2

programs)  Eastern Region

 Elko County Juvenile and Adult Drug Courts  White Pine County Adult and Juvenile Drug

Courts

 Fifth Judicial District

 Nye County Juvenile and Adult Drug Courts

 Central Region

 Humboldt County Adult Drug Court  Lander County Adult Drug Court  Pershing County Adult Drug Court

 Clark Region

 Eight Judicial District

 Adult Drug Court

 Child Support Drug Court

 Dependency Mothers’ Drug Court  Family Drug Court

 Felony DUI Court  Juvenile Drug Court  Mental Health Court

 Las Vegas Justice Court Adult Drug and DUI (3

programs) Courts

 Las Vegas Municipal Adult Drug, DUI, Habitual

Offender, and Female Prostitution Courts

 Henderson Municipal Habitual Offender Court  North Las Vegas Municipal Alcohol and Drug

(15)

15

Business Courts

Second Judicial District (Washoe) and Eighth Judicial

District (Clark)

WDCR 2.1; EDCR 1.61

Business Court Jurisdiction

Corporate Disputes

Business to Business Disputes

Business Court Caseloads, FY 2012

Court New Cases Transferred

Cases Dispositions Year End Pending Average Time to Disposition (months)

2nd JD 5 1 27 55 17

8th JD 273 NR 462 531 27

(16)

Administrative Office of the Courts

Legislative mandated or

requested reports

Alternative dispute

resolution (biennial)

Specialty Court

funding (biennial)

Uniform system for

judicial records

(annual)

Roles to assist with Judicial Branch administration

 Administrative support such

as budgets, personnel, benefits, policies,

legislation, etc.

 Education of judges and

court staff

 Trial court services such as

court interpreter

certification, specialty court funding, and coordination with justice partners

 Technology (e.g., state

sponsored case

management system,

justice integration, assist w/ NV Offense Codes)

(17)

17

AOC Work by Division

Administration

 Budget Preparation, Management, and Accounting  Human Resources/Payroll

 Senior Judge Program  Facilities Management  Judicial Branch Audits

Judicial Programs and Services

 Court Interpreter Certifications

 Limited Jurisdiction Courts Bench Book

 Court Improvement Program for dependent children  Specialty Court programs

 Interaction and coordination with federal, state, and local justice partners  Assistance to the trial courts

 Commission support – JCSN; Preservation, Access and Sealing of Court Records;

Indigent Defense Commission

 Judicial Education (including court staff)

(18)

AOC Work by Division

Information Technology

 Supreme Court support

 E-filing

 Document management system

 Appellate Court case management system

 Trial Court support

 State-sponsored case management system  Criminal Justice Integration

 Nevada Offense Codes

 Judicial Branch support

 Manage and maintain all servers and databases for the above support projects  Maintain hardware and software throughout Supreme Court

Supreme Court Police

(19)

19

Foreclosure Mediation Program (FMP)

 Created during the 2009 session of the Nevada Legislature

 Amended NRS Chapter 107

 Homeowners meet face-to-face with lender representatives who must have the authority to negotiate and modify the terms of a loan. Mediations can result in loan modification, a short sale agreement or other resolution.

 Brings together key stakeholders, including property owners, lenders, and their respective representatives, in a neutral setting to discuss alternatives to

foreclosure. By working together to explore various options, agreements can be reached that benefit both sides and avoid foreclosure.

 Funding

 $44.33 of the $200 fee for each Notice of Default and Intent to Sell filed

 $400 Mediation Service Fee

 The lender and the homeowner each pay $200  Passed through to the mediator

(20)

FMP Statistics

Program statistics available on-line:

http://foreclosure.nevadajudiciary.us

Category FY 11 FY 12 FY 13

Thru Dec

Notices of Default and Intent to Sell 54,191 16,818 8,528

Mediations Held 6,370 4,803 596 Agreement Outcomes Retained Property 3,227 1,941 989 547 173 80 Non-Agreement Outcomes 3,143 3,814 423 Certificates Issued 47,919 22,219 4,758 Non-Applicable Properties 45,936 19,125 4,388 Applicable Properties 1,983 3,094 370

(21)

21

FMP Revenue Projections

Notice of Default Fee (NODs)

projections are based on those

of the Economic Forum (NRS 353.246)

FY 14: $404,100 for 9,117 NODs projected to be filed

 FY 14 program expenses: $1,141,356

FY 15: $363,600 for 8,203 NODs projected to be filed

 FY 15 program expenses: $1,170,125

The program is spending down its general reserves

Mediation Service Fees

Mediations will be requested on 12% of NODs filed @ $400 each

 FY 14: 1,094 requests  FY 15: 984 requests

(22)

FMP Revenue: NOD Fees

$3,903,732 $2,708,626 $745,837 $693,210 $404,100 $363,600 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 $3,500,000 $4,000,000 $4,500,000 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 Actual Projected

(23)

23

Judicial Council of the State of Nevada

The Judicial Council of the State of Nevada shall…

 Develop and recommend… policies for the administration of the

judiciary.

 Consider issues forwarded to it by the Supreme Court and/or Chief

Justice.

 Review proposed legislation affecting the courts …

 Recommend legislation and/or rules … to the Supreme Court.  Establish committees to develop minimum standards, to be

recommended to the Supreme Court.

 Develop recommendations … for the improvement of Nevada's

courts and the statewide court system.

The Judicial Council of the State of Nevada (JCSN) is made up of representatives from all levels of courts, from all the regions of the State.

(24)

Special Supreme Court Commissions

and Committees

Commission on Statewide Juvenile Justice Reform

Commission on Preservation, Access, and Sealing of

Court Records

Indigent Defense Commission

Specialty Court Funding Committee

Court Improvement Program Select Committee

Access to Justice Commission

References

Related documents

Question What is the association of high cerebral microbleed (CMB) burden (>10 CMBs) with the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage following intravenous thrombolysis

This study adds value to previous findings in suggesting that schizophrenia genetic liability, indexed by genetic risk scores that were generated from a sample of adults with

Patient engagement is a goal of major health care reform initiatives including Meaningful Use, Patient-Centered Medical Homes (PCMH), and Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs).

– The top reasons companies gave for using stretch criteria in the 2010 survey were enhanced underwriting flexibility, competitive reasons, and improved risk selection. 

Before each DUI Drug Court hearing, the Judge and the DUI Drug Court team, which includes but is not limited to the Drug Court coordinator, the treatment and mental health

The Drug Court Judge will make all decisions regarding your participation in the Drug Court Program with input from the Drug Court Team.. In addition to the Judge, the

 Drug court programs integrate alcohol, other drug treatment services, and ongoing judicial interaction with each drug court program participant is essential;..  Abstinence

Circuit Court Secondary Juvenile Drug Court Diversion & Treatment Adolescents & Adults Intervention, Referral to treatment MD State Judiciary/Drug Court