• No results found

Language, news and volatility

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Language, news and volatility"

Copied!
16
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect

Journal

of

International

Financial

Markets,

Institutions

&

Money

j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / i n t f i n

Language,

news

and

volatility

Hans

Byström

LundUniversity,DepartmentofEconomics,Box7082,22007Lund,Sweden

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received16June2015

Accepted5March2016

Availableonline14March2016

Keywords: Newsaggregator Language Volatility Stockmarket Chinese

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

IuseGoogleNewstostudytherelationbetweennewsvolumesandstockmarketvolatilities. Morethanninemillionstockmarket-relatednewsstoriesinEnglishandChineseare col-lectedandthedynamicsofthenewsvolumeandthestockmarketvolatilityiscompared.I findthatthestockmarketvolatilityandthenumberofpubliclyavailableglobalnewsstories arestronglylinkedinbothlanguages.Furthermore,thedirectionallinkbetweennewsand volatilityratherisfromnewstovolatilitythanviceversa.Inout-of-sampleevaluationsof volatilityforecastsIfindnewsvolumestoimproveforecasts,regardlessoflanguage.

©2016TheAuthor.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCC BY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

1. Introduction

InthispaperItrytoshedsomenewlightontheoldquestionsofwhethertheamountofpubliclyreportedstock market-relatednewsislinkedtothevolatilityinthestockmarketand,ifso,ifitisnewsthatcausesvolatilityorviceversa.Iuse GoogleNewsTM,thenewsaggregator,tocapturetheactualmonth-to-monthdynamicsoftheglobalnewsvolume.Tomake

thestudymoreinclusive,Ilookatnewswritteninthetwomostimportantgloballanguages,i.e.EnglishandChinese. Largemovementsinthestockmarketareoften(expost)explainedasthemarket’sreactiontosuddenimportantnews arrivals.Atothertimes,however,marketsmoveseeminglywithoutanyevidenceofimportantnewsarriving.Acomparison oftworecentso-called“flashcrashes”canbeusedtoexemplifythis.Whilethe“TwitterCrash”ofApril2013,whenS&P500 lost$120billioninmarketvalueinseconds,wascausedbyfaketweets(i.e.news)aboutexplosionsattheWhiteHouse,the “FlashCrash”ofMay2010,when$1trillioninmarketvaluetemporarilywaslost,isnormallynotconsideredtohavebeen causedbythearrivalofnews.Inotherwords,itisnotobviousthatpricemovementsalwaysarereactionstonewinformation (news)arrivinginthemarket.

Themaincontributionofthispaper,comparedtothetypicalstudylinkingnewsandvolatility,isitsuniqueproxyforthe totalamountof(global)stockmarketrelatednewsincirculation.Byusinganautomatedweb-basednewsaggregator,inmy caseGoogleNews,Iamablenotonlytocollectasignificantshareofallgloballyavailablemarket-drivingpublicinformation but,throughthecontinuousdatacollectionprocess,Iamalsoabletocapturetheactualmonth-to-monthdynamicsofthis newsdissemination.Thatis,insteadofmerelylookingatspecificnewsevents,Ilookatthedynamicsoftheoverallflowof publicinformation.Moreover,byfocusingonthebulkoftherelevantinformationflow(eachmonth,Icollectallavailable

夽 ThisworkwassupportedbyTheMarianneandMarcusWallenbergFoundation[MMW2012.0019];andHandelsbankensForskningsstiftelser

[P2013-0209:1].

∗ Tel.:+46462229478;fax:+46462224118.

E-mailaddress:[email protected] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2016.03.002

1042-4431/© 2016 The Author. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license

(2)

newsstorieswhereagenericphrasesuchas“stockmarket”ismentioned)Iefficientlyavoidanyundueemphasizeonnews storiesthat,expost,turnouttohavehadasignificanteffectonthevolatilityinourparticularmarkets.

Intotal,Icollectmorethanninemillionstockmarket-relatednewsstoriespublishedbymajornewspapersandother newssourcesworldwideoveraneight-yearlongperiod.Toputthisamountofnewsintoperspectiveitcanbecompared tothe120,000Reuter’sNewsServicenewsreleasescollectedbyBerryandHowe(1994),the752,647WallStreetJournal andBroadtapestoryheadlinescollectedbyMitchellandMulherin(1994)andthe129,737DowJonesandReutersnews announcementscollectedbyJohnsonandMarietta-Westberg(2004).Furthermore,tohighlightthetrulyglobalnatureof bothnewsandstockmarketsIhavecollectednewsinbothofthetwomajorgloballanguages,i.e.EnglishandChinese;eight millionofthenewsstoriesareinEnglishandonemillionareinChinese(Mandarin).Ibelievethistobethefirsttimeanyone looksatnewswritteninChinese,i.e.,arguably,thesecond-mostimportantlanguageintheworld,inconnectiontomarket volatility.TheEnglish-Chineselanguage-pairisalsoparticularlyinterestinginthelightofthetwolanguages’significant semanticandlinguisticdifferencesandduetothefactthatfewstockmarketparticipantsactuallyreadnewsbothinEnglish andinChinese.

Stockreturnvolatilityvarieswidelyacrosstime.Italsotendstobepersistentandtoexhibitso-calledvolatilityclustering, whereperiodsofhighvolatilityarefollowedbyhighvolatilityandviceversa.Althoughitissomethingofastylizedfact thatnewinformationreachingthemarket,i.e.news,isthemaincontributorofthisvolatility,andalthoughseveralstudies havelookedintotherelationshipbetweenmarketvolatilityandnewsdissemination,theempiricalevidenceisnotasstrong asonewouldexpect.Infact,evenwhenalinkbetweennewsandmarketmovementsisfound,thestrengthofthelinkis oftenquestioned.OneofthefirststudiesonnewsandvolatilitywasFrenchandRoll(1986)whocomparesthevolatility intheUSstockmarketduringexchangetradinghoursandnon-tradinghoursandconcludesthatthedifferenceintheflow ofinformation,particularlyprivateinformation,explainsthedifferenceinvolatility.Inotherwords,theyconcludethatit isthevariabilityintheflowofprivateinformationthatexplainsmostofthevariabilityinvolatility.MitchellandMulherin (1994),inturn,looksatpublicnewsandfindsapositiveandstatisticallysignificant,albeitweak,relationshipbetweenthe variability(absolutereturn)intheUSstockmarketandthenumberofpublicnewsannouncements,measuredasthedaily numberofstoryheadlinesreportedbyDowJones&Company(WallStreetJournalandBroadtape).BerryandHowe(1994), ontheotherhand,doesnotfindthatpublicinformationisstatisticallyrelatedtostockvolatilityintheUSintradaystock market.BerryandHowe(1994)measurespublicinformationflowasthenumberofnewsreleasesbyReuter’sNewsServices. Theinterestrateandforeignexchangemarketsalsoexhibittime-varyingvolatilityandEderingtonandLee(1993)shows thattheimpactofscheduledmacroeconomicnewsannouncementshasanimmediateeffectonpricesandalonglasting effectonpricevolatility.Inthestockmarket,anevenlongerlastingperiodofelevatedvolatilityafterannouncementsis foundbyPatellandWolfson(1984).Inamorerecentstudy,JohnsonandMarietta-Westberg(2004)findsthatincreasesin idiosyncraticstockreturnvolatilityarepositivelyrelatedtoincreasesintheamountoffirm-specificpublicnews.Andin Byström(2009,2011)IusethesameGoogleNewsmethodologyofcollectingnewsasinthisstudybutacrossamuchshorter sampleandlimitingtheanalysistosimplecross-correlations.1TheresultsinByström(2009,2011),evenifmerelytentative, indicateapositivelinkbetweenstockmarketvolatilityandnewsvolumes.

Arelatedstrandofliteraturefocusesoninvestorattention,ratherthanonnewsdigestion.Here,anotherGoogleproduct, GoogleTrendsTM,hasbeenemployedrecently.Inthisliterature,Googlesearchfrequencies(SearchVolumeIndex(SVI))

areusedasaproxyforinvestorattention.DimpflandJank(2015)proxyinvestorattentionwithGooglesearchfrequencies andfindsastrongcorrelation,usingdailydata,betweenthesearchqueryvolumeandUSstockmarketvolatility.Theyalso showthatsearchqueriesimprovevolatilityforecasts.Similarly,Vozlyublennaia(2014)collectsGooglesearchfrequencies onaweeklybasisusingGoogleTrendsforarangeofdifferentfinancialmarkets,includingstockmarkets,butfindsarather weakrelationshipbetweeninvestorattention(Googlesearchfrequency)andvolatility.Finally,Daetal.(2011),although notexplicitlyfocusingonvolatility,findsapositiverelationshipbetweenabnormalabsolutereturnsintheUSstockmarket andtheGoogleSearchVolumeIndex.Likethecurrentpaper,allthesestudiesemploymodernweb-basedtools,butrather thancollectingnewsvolumestheycollectsearchfrequencies.

Moststudiesoninformationflowsandstockmarketreactionshavewrestledwithvariousdata-relatedissues.Some studieshavenotbeenabletodifferentiatebetweengood,badandneutralnewsandmanyhavenotbeenabletomeasure theimportanceofaparticularpieceofnews.Otherstudiesisolatespecificeventsandthereforelackacontinuousmeasure ofthenumberofavailablenewsstories.Thisistypicallyanissuewhenmacroeconomicnewsisstudied,andwithouta continuoussamplingoftheamountofnewsincirculation,thedynamicsofnewsvolumescannotbestudied.Ibelievethat severaloftheseissuesareavoidedinourresearchsetup.First,sinceGoogleNewsallowstheusertospecifyexactlywhich wordstringstocrawl,Iam,byconstruction,abletogroupnewsaccordingtosentiment(neutralnewsorbadnews).2The

1 Byström(2009,2011)looksatthelinkbetweennewsandvolatilityusingGoogleNewsbutotherwisethosestudiesdiffersignificantlyfromthisstudy. InthispaperIincludenewsinChinese(Mandarin)aswellasinEnglish,Ilooknotonlyatcontemporaneouscorrelationsbutfocusinsteadprimarily onregressionsbetweencurrentvolatilityandlaggednewsvolumes,Irunlead-lagregressionstotellinwhichdirectioninformationflows,Ilookatthe volatilityforecastingperformanceofnews,Ilookatchangesinadditiontolevels,Ilookatatime-periodthatisalmostthreetimesaslong,Iusemonthly non-overlappingnewsvolumeobservationsratherthandailyoverlappingones,IlookattwelvemajorstockindexesinboththeEnglish-languagedominated worldandintheChinese-languagedominatedpartoftheworldandinarobustnesssectionIinvestigatewhetherextremenewsobservations,thecrisis period,missingobservationsortheexactwordingofthenewssearchstringisdrivingtheresults.

(3)

wordstringsinthisparticularpaperarestockmarketandstockmarketcrashintheUSeditionand (stockmarket)and (approximatelytranslatedintoEnglishasstockmarketcollapseandstockmarketcrash)intheChina edition.3Second,byfocusingontheamountofnewsratherthanthemereexistenceornotofnewsIamautomaticallyable totellwhethertheunderlyingactionsoreventsthatshapethenewsareimportantornot.Third,throughthecontinuous datacollectionprocess,Iamabletocapturethetime-seriesdynamicsofthenewsincirculation.Finally,thecomprehensive natureoftheGoogleNewsgeneratednewsdatabaseandthesheernumberofnewsstoriesstrengthenstheresults.

SincethenewsthatIamcollectingusingGoogleNewsisglobalinnature,inthesensethatitiswrittenintwolanguages thattogetherarereadbyamajorityoftheworld’smarketparticipants,Ihavechosentolookatgloballyimportantstock marketsandthevolatilityinthemajorstockindexesinthesemarkets.Duetothedual-languagefocusoftheresearchIhave chosenhalfofthestockindexesfromtheEnglish-speakingworldandhalffromtheChinese-speakingworld.Theformer areMSCIWorld,S&P500,DJIA,Nasdaq,Russell2000andFTSE100andthelatterareShanghaiA,ShanghaiB,ShenzhenA,

ShenzhenB,HangSengChinaEnterprisesandHangSengChina-AffiliatedCorporations.Intotal,IlookattheimpactofGoogle News-generatedglobalnewsvolumesontwelvemajorstockindexes.

Tomyknowledge,thisisthefirsttimeanewsaggregatorisemployedintheforecastingoffinancialmarketvolatility and,furthermore,thefirsttimerelativelystrongevidenceisfoundthatnewsvolumescanactuallypredictstockmarket volatility.Inadditiontorobustandsignificantpositive contemporaneouscorrelationsbetweentheamountofnewsin circulationandthevolatilityinvariousmajorstockmarkets,lead-lagregressionstellusthatthedirectionallinkbetween newsandvolatilityratherisfromnewstovolatilitythanviceversa.Ialsofindevidenceofnewsvolumespredicting (one-monthahead)volatility.Thelatterfindingissupportedbysignificantandeconomicallyrelevantnewsvolumeregression parametersandeconomicallymeaningfulout-of-sampleforecastingerrorreductions.Theaverageimpactofaone-standard deviationchangeinnewsvolumeonnextmonth’sstockindexvolatilityis11basispoints(0.11%).Albeitnotlarge,the impactiseconomicallymeaningfulwhencomparedtothemeanofthetwelvestockindexes’unconditionalvolatilityacross thesampleperiod(coveringtheveryvolatilecredit-andeuro-areasovereigncrises)whichis123basispoints.Moreover, whenIlookatchanges,ratherthanlevels,theeconomicsignificanceiseven moresignificant(9basispointsversusa meanof44basis points).Theout-of-samplemeanabsoluteforecastingerror(MAE),inturn,isonaveragereduced by 15%whenlaggednewsvolumesareaddedtopastvolatilitieswhenpredicting(one-monthahead)volatility.Itshouldbe stressedthatnofine-tuningoftheforecastsaremade,theestimationwindowisforexamplesetratherarbitrarily,andfor somemarket/language/searchstringcombinationstheeconomicsignificanceofincludingnewsvolumesinthevolatility predictionismuchlarger.Inotherwords,thereisscopeforamoresubstantialforecastingimprovementwhenallowingfor systematicdatamining.IconcludetheempiricalstudywitharobustnesssectionwhereIfindtheresultstoberobustto theremovalofextremenewsvolumeobservations,creditcrisisobservationsandmissingobservationsaswellastoslight changestothenewsvolumecollectionprocess.

2. Newsvolumecollectionanddatadescription

Newsiswritteninhundredsofdifferentlanguages,somereadandunderstoodbyglobalaudiencesofmillionsofpeople, othersreadsolelybylocalsorcognoscenti.Atanypointintimetherearethousandsofnewspiecesavailabletomarket participantsandanyofthisnewsmayaffectthemarketinonewayoranother.Inthispaper,Ifocusonthevolatilityinthe majorstockmarketsandonhowthisvolatilityisrelatedtotheamountofnewsavailable.Ithereforefocusprimarilyonnews thatislikelytohaveanimpactonstockmarketvolatility.Ihavealsochosentofocusonthetwo,arguably,mostimportant globallanguages,EnglishandChinese.Englishisthelinguafrancaoftodaywithuptoabillionnativeand non-native speakers.Chinese,ontheotherhand,isthemostcommonlyspokennativelanguageintheworldwitharoundonebillion nativespeakers.Comparedtomanyotherfinanciallyimportantlanguage-pairs,suchasFrenchandEnglishorSpanishand Portuguese,thereisalsoverylittleoverlapinthereadershipofEnglishandChinesenews.Infact,speakersofonelanguage oftendonotunderstandasinglewordintheotherlanguage.Forus,thisisofimportancesincethismakestheEnglishand ChineseGoogleNews-generatednewsvolumesmoredistinctiveandmorelikelytohavetheirownuniquerelationtomarket volatility.

IcollectwhatIdeemtobestockmarket-relatednewsvolumesusinganEnglishlanguageedition(theUSedition)as wellasaChineselanguageedition(theChinaedition)ofthenewsaggregatorGoogleNews.Thisnewsaggregatormakes itpossibletocollectasignificantamountofthemanythousandsofavailablenewspiecesaroundtheworldselectedand groupedbytopic.Bycollecting,onamonthlybasis,thenumberofnewsstoriespresentedbyGoogleNewsIgetanestimate ofthedynamicsofthenewsvolume,i.e.thedynamicsoftheoverallflowofpublicinformation,ratherthanjustsnapshots ofthevolumearoundcertainchosenevents.ThenewsvolumeiscollectedusingtwodifferenteditionsofGoogleNewsas wellastwodifferentlanguages,EnglishandChinese(Mandarin).4Thetotalnumberofseparatenewsstoriescollectedin

3Ofcourse,anysearchforthephrasestockmarketalsoincludesbadnewslikestockmarketcrash.Onaverage,however,Iassumethatgoodandbadnews averageoutwhensearchingforthe“neutral”termstockmarket.

4ApreliminaryanalysisindicatesthatthesearchresultsareverysimilarwhenthenewsdataiscollectedfromtheHongKongeditionofGoogleNews insteadoftheChinaedition.

(4)

Table1

NewsVolume–DescriptiveStatistics.InthisTableIpresentsomedescriptivestatisticsforthe105monthlyEnglishnewsvolumeobservations(numberof

monthlynewsstories)fromSeptember11,2006toSeptember1,2014andforthe51monthlyChinesenewsvolumeobservationsfromNovember1,2010

toSeptember1,2014.

Stockmarket Stockmarket

crash (stockmarket) (stockmarket “collapse”) (stockmarket “crash”) Mean 88,600 1900 19,100 630 890 Standarddeviation 59,100 2500 15,400 390 720 Max 307,000 23,400 54,700 1900 4600 Min 4100 400 1500 190 200

thiswayoverthetime-period2006–2014ismorethanninemillion,ofwhicheightmillionarewritteninEnglishandone millionarewritteninChinese.5

GoogleNewsisanautomatednewsaggregator(computer-generatednewsservice)thatusescomputeralgorithmsto collect,presentandsortwebnewsintocategories.GoogleNewsaggregatesnewsfrommorethan50,000newssources worldwide.Itthengroupssimilarstoriestogether,anddisplaysthemaccordingtoeachreader’sinterests(Google,2014). Newsstoriesarecollectedfromnewspagesonthewebwiththegeographicallocationofthenewssourcesdependenton theedition.GoogleNewsincludesnewsthatappearedonanyoftheselectedwebpagesduringthepast30daysandsince nohumaneditorsareusedthepolitical/ideologicalbiasisminimized(Google,2014).Theactualnewssourcesareprobably notknownoutsidetheGoogleplex(theGoogleHQ)butunverifiedrumoursonthewebclaimthatthelargestcontributorsto theGoogleNewsflowareNewYorkPost,WashingtonPost,HoustonChronicleandBloombergintheUS,andTheGuardian, BBCNewsandTheTimesintheUK.

InordertomaketheexercisefeasibleIfocussolelyonnewspiecesdeemedrelevanttostockmarketparticipants.I thereforelimitmyGoogleNewssearchtothesearchstringsstockmarketandstockmarketcrashintheUSeditionand

(stockmarket)and (approximatelytranslatedintoEnglishasstockmarketcollapseandstockmarket

crash)intheChineseedition.6DespitethislimitationinnewscoverageIstillmanagetocollectmorethanninemillion separatenewsstoriescontainingthewordstockmarketovertheeight-yearperiod2006–2014.7

Thedata,i.e.theamountofnewspubliclyavailableworldwideoverthelast30days,iscollectedonamonthlybasisfrom September11,2006toSeptember1,2014fortheEnglishnewsandfromNovember1,2010toSeptember1,2014forthe Chinesenews.Moreexactly,thedataiscollectedmanuallybytheauthoreveryfourthMondayatapproximately9:00a.m. CentralEuropeanTimeatthesamelocation(theofficeoftheauthor)andwithoutbeingsignedintoanyGoogleAccount. OnahandfulofoccasionswhentheauthorwastravellingonthescheduledMonday,thedatacollectionwasdoneonthe followingTuesdayorWednesdayoratanotherlocation.8,9Onanyparticularday,theGoogleNewsaggregatorcollectsdata fromthelast30-dayperiod.Thismeansthatmydefinitionofamonth(asa4-weekor28-dayperiod)differsslightlyfrom Google’sdefinitionofamonth(a30-dayperiod).Thedifferenceissmall,2days,andsincetheadditional2daysofnews crawlingalwaysconstitutesaweekend(whenmarketsareclosedandthereislessmarket-relatednewsavailable)four weeksagoIbelievethatitbiasestheresultsminimally.Inanycase,thisdiscrepancyshouldprobablybiastheresultsagainst

usfindingalinkbetweennewsvolumeandvolatility.10

InTable1,Ipresentsomedescriptivestatisticsonthemonthlysamplednewsvolume.Themonthlynumberofnews storiesvariesnotonlyacrosstimebutamongthesearchstringsusedintheGoogleNewssearch.Whilethemoregeneral searchstringstockmarket(inEnglish)returnsonaverage89,000separatenewsstoriespermonth,themorenarrowsearch stringstockmarketcrash(again,inEnglish)returnsonaverage1900newsstoriespermonth.Thepatternissimilarforthe Chinese-languagenewsvolumeswhere (stockmarket)onaveragereturns19,000newsstoriespermonthand

5 Inmid-May2012,thenumberofnewsstoriesreportedbyGoogleNewsincreasesdramatically(mostlikelybytheinclusionofadditionalnewssources)

andIhavethereforechosentoadjustthenumbersfromJune2012onwards.Thenumbersarenormalizedsothatthefirstobservationafterthechange

isidenticaltothelastobservationbeforethechange.Reportednumbersarealwaysnormalizedonesandtheyarethereforenotdirectlycomparableto currentGoogleNewsvolumes.Thetotalnumberofnewsstoriesreportedinthispaperisthereforealsounder-reported.Someofthecorrelationanalysis inthispaperhasbeenredonewithdataupuntilthechangewithroughlyunchangedresults.

6 Thereasonforchoosingtwodifferent“pessimistic”searchstringsinChineseistocontrolforanypotentiallanguage-differenceintheinterpretationof theword“crash”.

7 Here,Iassumethatnonewsstoryisreprintedagainatalaterstageandthatnotwonewsstoriesareexactlyidentical.

8 The“December”searchresultissometimesmissingduetoChristmasandNewYear’sEve.Therearealsosomemissingobservationsonotherdays

randomlyscatteredthroughouttheyearsandtheseaswellasthemissingDecemberobservationsareallreplacedbythelastavailabledatapoint.Inorder toseewhetherthesemissingobservationsaffecttheresults,adummyisaddedtotheregressions,andcorrelationsarerecalculatedwiththedatesofthe

missingobservationsremoved,withalmostunchangedresults.

9 Inordertomakesurethatthenewsvolumeisnotplatform-dependentthenumberofnewsstorieswasoccasionallycollectedatseverallocationsthe

sameday(atrandomlychosendaysthroughoutthesampleperiod)withveryminordifferences.

10 AccordingtothehomepageofGoogleNewsthenewsaggregatorincludesnewsarticlesthathavebeencrawledwithinthelast30days.However,a

carefulstudyofthesearchresultssometimesrevealsafewnewsstoriesthatare(afewdaysorweeks)olderthan30days.However,ontheseoccasions thenumberofnewsstoriesthatareolderthan30dayshavebeenfoundtobefewcomparedtothetotalnumberofstoriesandthereforelesslikelyto significantlybiastheresults.

(5)

Fig.1. English-languagenewsvolumeandMSCIWorldstockmarketvolatility.ThisgraphshowstheEnglish-language(USedition)GoogleNewsvolumes forthesearchstring“stockmarketcrash”togetherwiththeMSCIWorldstockreturnvolatility.Boththenewsvolumeandthestockvolatilityarenormalized

tostartatoneandaresampledonamonthlybasisbutsmoothedusingathree-month(quarterly)smoothingwindow.

Fig.2.Chinese-languagenewsvolumeandMSCIWorldstockmarketvolatility.ThisgraphshowstheChinese-language(Chinaedition)GoogleNews

volumesforthesearchstring“stockmarketcrash”togetherwiththeMSCIWorldstockreturnvolatility.Boththenewsvolumeandthestockvolatilityare

normalizedtostartatoneandaresampledonamonthlybasisbutsmoothedusingathree-month(quarterly)smoothingwindow.

(stockmarketcrash)onaveragereturns890newsstoriespermonth(acrossashortertime-period).Thetime-seriesvariation ofthestockmarketcrashnewsvolumes,inEnglishandinChinese,respectively,isgraphicallypresentedinFigs.1and2.Not surprisingly,theamountofstockmarket-relatednewsincirculationwasatitshighestaroundtheperiodoftheLehmann Brotherscollapse.Thenumberofnewsstoriescontainingthewordsstockmarketwashigherthan200,000(atroughly2½ timesthemonthlyaverage)bothinSeptemberandOctoberin2008.Twoyearsearlier,inSeptemberandOctober2006, thenumberofnewsstorieswasaround70,000permonth.TheChinesenewswasnotcollectedatthetimeoftheLehman Brotherscollapseandthepeakinthenumberofnewsstoriescontainingtheword (stockmarket)wasreachedinthe springof2012whenmorethan30,000newsstorieswerereleasedeachmonthfromMarchtoJune.

Thestockmarketdata,inturn,iscollectedforthesametime-periodasthenewsvolumes,i.e.September11,2006to September1,2014.ThedataisdownloadedfromDatastreamandallthestockindexesaredenominatedintheir home-currency.Iincludetwelvedifferentstockindexesinmyanalysis.Sincemyaimistostudytheeffectoflanguageonthe news-volatilitylink,IhavechosenhalfoftheindexesfromthemainlyEnglish-speakingsphere,i.e.theUS,theUKandthe globalcommunity,andhalffromthemainlyChinese-speakingsphere,whichIdefineasChinaincludingHongKong.As thestockindexrepresentingtheglobalAnglophonecommunityIhavechosentheMSCIWorldstockindexwhichincludes securitiesfrom23developedstockmarketsaroundtheworld.FromtheUSIhaveincludedtheS&P500-,DJIA-, Nasdaq-andRussell2000indexes.Themainmotivationbehindincludingthelasttwoindexesistheirfocusonsmall-capstocks.It ispossiblethatthenews-volatilitylinkisdifferentforsmallstockswherethebalancebetweensmallretail-investorsand largeinstitutionalinvestorsisdifferent.TheUK,finally,isrepresentedbytheFTSE100indexwhichcoversthe100largest companiesontheLondonStockExchange.

WhilemostreadersarefamiliarwiththeAnglophoneworldanditsstockmarkets,theChinese-speakingsphereandthe stockmarketsdominatedbyChinese-speakersprobablyneedssomeintroduction.SincemyfocusisMandarin,themain languagespokeninChina,IhaveonlychosenstockindexesthatcontainChinesestocks.TheChinesestockmarketishighly segmentedwithdifferentmarketsaimedatdifferentinvestors:

(6)

•A-shares:A-sharesareRMB-denominatedsharesissuedbydomesticcompaniesregisteredinmainlandChinaandlisted ontheShanghaiStockExchangeortheShenzhenStockExchange.A-sharescanonlybepurchasedbydomesticChinese investorsorholdersofQualifiedForeignInstitutionalInvestor(QFII)licenses.

•B-shares:B-sharesaredollar-denominatedsharesissuedbydomesticcompaniesregisteredinmainlandChinaandlisted ontheShanghaiStockExchange(US$)ortheShenzhenStockExchange(HK$).B-sharescanonlybepurchasedbyforeign investorsorbydomesticinvestorswithforeigncurrencyholdings,andcapitalcontrolsrestrictChineseresidents’ability topurchaseBshares.

•H-shares:H-sharesareHK$-denominatedsharesissuedbycompaniesincorporatedinmainlandChinabutlistedonthe HongKongStockExchange.H-sharescannotbepurchasedbydomesticChineseinvestors.

•RedChip-shares:RedChip-sharesareHK$-denominatedsharesissuedbyChinesecompaniesincorporatedinHongKong andlistedontheHongKongStockExchange.RedChip-sharescannotbepurchasedbydomesticChineseinvestors.

WhiletheA-share marketisaimedmainlyatdomesticinvestors,theB-sharemarketis aimedpredominantly at for-eigninvestorsandtheH-shareandRedChip-sharemarketsareaimedsolelyatforeigninvestors.Thisgradualincreasein segmentationfacilitatesthestudyoftheeffectofmarketparticipantandlanguageonthenewsvolume—volatilitylink.

IlookatChinesesharestradedonthreedifferentexchanges;A-andB-sharestradedontheShanghaiStockExchange, A-andB-sharestradedontheShenzhenStockExchange,andH-andRedChip-sharestradedontheHongKongStockExchange. TheactualstockindexesaretheShanghaiSEAIndex,theShanghaiSEBIndex,theShenzhenSEAIndex,theShenzhenSEB

Index,theHangSengChinaEnterprisesIndexandtheHangSengChina-AffiliatedCorporationsIndex.

Eachmonth,i.e.everyfourthMonday,thepastmonth’sstockmarketvolatilityiscalculatedasthestandarddeviation ofthedailystockindexreturnsoverthelastfourweekssothatthetime-periodforthevolatilityestimatematchesthe time-periodforthenewsvolumecollection(exceptforthe2daysdiscussedabove).Thepossibilityofmatchingthenews collectionperiod(onemonth)withthevolatilitycomputationperiod(onemonth)isonehugeadvantageofusingamonthly frequencyintheanalysis.Anotheradvantageisthattheexacttimestampofthenewsreleaseisnotrequired(aproblem facedbyseveralpreviousstudies,forinstanceDimpflandJank(2015))andthatthetimezonedifferencesaroundtheworld, mostnotablybetweenChinaandtheUS,haveaminimaleffectontheresults.

3. Therelationbetweennewsvolumesandstockmarketvolatility

Inefficientfinancialmarkets,pricemovementsaretheresultsofmarketparticipantsreactingonmarket-relatednews. Asaresult,themorenewsthatreachesthemarketoveracertaintime-periodthehigherthepricevolatilityinthemarket islikelytobe.InthisstudyofstockmarketsworldwideIthereforeexpectthestockreturnvolatilitytobepositivelylinked totheamountofstockmarket-relatednewsworldwide.Indeed,aninitialvisualinspectionofFigs.1and2,wheremonthly stockmarketvolatilitiesandnewsvolumesarepresentedonamonthlybasisforEnglishandChinesenewsstories(smoothed usingaquarter-of-a-yearlongwindowandnormalizedtostartatone),motivatesustoinvestigatethislinkfurther.

3.1. Correlationanalysisofnewsvolumesandstockmarketvolatility

Tostartwith,Ipresentsimplecontemporaneouscorrelationsbetweennewsaggregatorgeneratednewsvolumesand stockmarketvolatilities.IstudytwelvedifferentstockmarketindexesandcollectnewsinEnglishaswellasinChinese. Allvariablesaresampledonamonthlybasis.InadditiontolevelsIalsolookatchangesinnewsvolumeandvolatility. Forthechanges,IfollowMitchellandMulherin(1994),whotakedifferencesfromamulti-daymovingaverage,bytaking differencesfroma12-monthmovingaverageofthepastnewsvolumeandvolatility,respectively.JustlikeMitchelland Mulherin(1994),Itakemulti-perioddifferencestoavoidthelossofinformationaroundtheoccasionalclusteringofhigh newsvolumesandhighvolatilitylevelsandtoreducetheinfluenceofpossiblemonth-of-the-yeareffects.

ThecorrelationresultsarepresentedinTable2,whichisdividedintotwoparts,oneforlevelsandoneforchanges.With veryfewexceptions,thecorrelationcoefficients(basedontheentiresample)amongnewsvolume-andvolatilitylevelsare large,positiveandstatisticallysignificant.Mostcorrelationslieinthe0.3–0.8rangeandtheonlynon-significantcorrelations arethoseinvolvingtheChinese-language (stockmarketcrash)newsstories.Thesecorrelationsaretypicallythe lowest,regardlessofstockmarket,andinthemainlandChinastockmarketsinShanghaiandShenzhenthecorrelationsare occasionallyevenslightlynegative.Evenifthenegativecorrelationsaresmallandnotstatisticallysignificant,itisinteresting thatthelinktoChinesenewsisfoundtobeweakestintheChinesestockmarketregardlessoftheactualGoogleNewssearch string.

WhenIturntochangesratherthanlevels,thecorrelationcoefficientsarestilllargelypositiveandstatisticallysignificant. Thestatisticalsignificance,i.e.thesize,ofthecorrelationsisgenerallysomewhatweakerforchanges,however,andthe correlationsareagainlowestwhenChinesenewsormainlandChinastockmarketsareinvolved.Forchanges,though,the linkbetweenmainlandChinastockmarketsandnewsisweakacrosstheboard,i.e.regardlessofthelanguageofthenews. OnepossibleexplanationfortheratherweakrelationshipbetweennewsandstockvolatilityinmainlandChina(i.e.excluding stockstradedinHongKong)isthatthesemarketsaredominatedbyinvestorsthatdonotread,oratleastdonottradeon, (traditional)news.ThishypothesisisstrengthenedbythefactthatthecorrelationisparticularlyweakintheA-sharemarket

(7)

Table2

CorrelationsbetweenNewsVolumeandVolatilityInthisTableIpresentNewsVolume–Volatilitycorrelationsforthetwelvestockindexeswhennews

volumesarecollectedbyGoogleNewsisinEnglishandChinese,respectively.Resultsarepresentedbothforlevelsandchanges.

NewsinEnglish(Levels)

Stockmarket Stockmarketcrash

MSCI 0.50*** 0.77*** S&P500 0.57*** 0.75*** DJIA 0.57*** 0.77*** NASDAQ 0.55*** 0.74*** Russell2000 0.48*** 0.66*** FTSE100 0.60*** 0.79*** ShanghaiA 0.59*** 0.34*** ShanghaiB 0.47*** 0.33*** ShenzhenA 0.49*** 0.26*** ShenzhenB 0.50*** 0.33*** HongKongH 0.66*** 0.73***

HongKongRedChip 0.66*** 0.69***

NewsinChinese(Levels)

(stockmarket) (stockmarket“collapse”) (stockmarket“crash”)

MSCI 0.47*** 0.75*** 0.22* S&P500 0.34*** 0.71*** 0.26** DJIA 0.32** 0.71*** 0.27*** NASDAQ 0.33*** 0.67*** 0.25** Russell2000 0.35*** 0.67*** 0.19* FTSE100 0.45*** 0.70*** 0.18 ShanghaiA 0.23** 0.40*** 0.00 ShanghaiB 0.33*** 0.42*** 0.02 ShenzhenA 0.23** 0.37*** 0.06 ShenzhenB 0.37*** 0.54*** 0.03 HongKongH 0.29** 0.69*** 0.14

HongKongRedChip 0.33*** 0.67*** 0.17

NewsinEnglish(Changes)

Stockmarket Stockmarketcrash

MSCI 0.19** 0.71*** S&P500 0.18** 0.62*** DJIA 0.16* 0.62*** NASDAQ 0.15* 0.61*** Russell2000 0.17** 0.58*** FTSE100 0.23*** 0.62*** ShanghaiA 0.09 0.17** ShanghaiB 0.03 0.18** ShenzhenA 0.02 0.07 ShenzhenB 0.04 0.19** HongKongH 0.21** 0.53***

HongKongRedChip 0.27*** 0.54***

NewsinChinese(Changes)

(stockmarket) (stockmarket“collapse”) (stockmarket“crash”)

MSCI 0.09 0.63*** 0.37*** S&P500 0.06 0.61*** 0.35*** DJIA 0.06 0.60*** 0.35*** NASDAQ 0.10 0.59*** 0.35*** Russell2000 0.05 0.58*** 0.27** FTSE100 0.02 0.54*** 0.28** ShanghaiA −0.24** 0.26** 0.04 ShanghaiB 0.01 0.27** 0.10 ShenzhenA −0.08 0.21* 0.01 ShenzhenB −0.05 0.39*** 0.11 HongKongH −0.07 0.54*** 0.23**

(8)

whichisaimedmainlyatdomestic(retail)investors.Infact,thelinkbetweenthevolatilityintheChinesestockmarketand theamountofstockmarket-relatednewsreachingthemarketparticipantsisstrongerinmarketswheretherearefewer mainlandChineseretailinvestors.ThelinkisstrongestintheH-shareandRedChip-sharemarketsinHongKongwhere Chineseretailinvestorsarebannedfromtrading.ThelinkissomewhatweakerinthetwoB-sharemarketswherefew Chineseretailinvestorsinvestanditisweakestintheretail-dominatedA-sharemarkets.

Tosomeextent,thesefindingsonthesegmentationandinformationprocessingintheChinesestockmarketareinline withthelimitedamountofresearchthatexistsonthetopic.InapreviousstudyusingGoogleNews,Byström(2011)finds astronglinkbetweenEnglish-languagenewsvolumesworldwideandtheglobalstockmarketvolatility,andaweakerlink betweentheChinesestockmarketandthesamesetofworldwide(English)news.PoonandFung(2000)looksathow informationflowsamongthevariousChina-andHongKong-basedmarketsandfindsreturnandvolatilityspillovereffects amongsecuritieslistedonthedifferentmarkets.TheRedChipmarketisfoundtoprocessinformationfasterthantheother markets.ThesegmentationandinformationflowsamongChinesestockmarketshasalsobeenstudiedbyYang(2003)who findstheforeigninvestorswhodominatetheB-sharemarkettobebetterinformedthanthedomesticinvestorsinthe A-sharemarket.AndinastudyrelatingnewsandstockmarketvolatilityinthesegmentedChinesestockmarket,Suand Fleisher(1999)findsthevolatilityintheA-sharemarketinthelate90stobesignificantlyhigherthanthatintheB-share marketandtheytrytoexplainthisfactusingargumentsrelatedtonewsflowsanddifferentinvestorbases.

Lookingattheoverallpicture,however,thelinkbetweennewsandvolatilityisstrong.Thosemonthswhenalotofnews isreleasedaretypicallyalsothosemonthswhenthestockmarketvolatilityishigh,andmonthswithsignificantrelative increases/decreasesinnewsvolumes(relativetothelasttwelvemonths’volume)arealsomonthswithasignificantrelative increase/decreaseinmarketactivity(i.e.volatility).Additionalevidenceofthestrongassociationbetweennewsandvolatility isgiveninFigs.1and2wheretherelativesizeofthemonthlymovementsinnewsvolumeisquitesimilartotherelative sizeofthemovementsintheMSCIWorldvolatility.Thatis,newsvolumesandstockvolatilitiesarenotonlymovinginthe samedirectionatthesametimebuttheactualsizeofthechangesissimilaraswell.

3.2. Regressionanalysisofnewsvolumesandstockmarketvolatility

Thenextstepistorununivariatelead-lagOLSregressionsbetweennewsvolumeandstockmarketvolatility.The regres-sionsallowustoassessthepredictiveabilityofnewsvolumesandtoevaluatetheeconomicsignificanceoftheinter-temporal news-volatilitylinkinthestockmarket.Iruntwosetsofregressions.Inthefirstset,thedependentvariableisthe(monthly) volatilityandtheexplanatoryvariablesare(one-month)laggednewsvolumeand(one-month)laggedvolatility.Inthe sec-ondset,Ireversetheregressionandthedependentvariableisthe(monthly)newsvolumeandtheexplanatoryvariables are(one-month)laggedvolatilityand(one-month)laggednewsvolume.Toaccountforthepossibleinfluenceofmissing newsvolumevaluesIincludeadummyforthemissingvaluesinallreportedregressions.Theregressionsincludeonlyone lagofvolatilityandnewsvolumeandthereasonisthatIlookatmonthlydata;anyempiricalrelationshipfoundbetween stockmarketvolatilitythismonthandnewsreleasedseveralmonthsagoislikelytobespurious.Indeed,Tetlock(2007), wholooksatdailynewsreleasesandincludeslagsuptofivedays,findsareversalintheinitialreactiontonewsalready fourorfivedaysafterthenewsrelease.AndVozlyublennaia(2014),whocollectsGooglesearchqueriesonaweeklybasis asameasureofinvestorattention,arguesthatherweaklinkbetweenattentionandvolatilitycouldbecausedbyherusing weekly,ratherthandaily,datasincetheeffectofattentiononvolatilitycoulddisappearalreadyindays,ratherthaninweeks. Inotherwords,ifthesameappliestonewsandtoitseffectonvolatility,thereisnoreasontoexpectalinkbetweenstock marketvolatilitythismonthandnewsreleasedseveralmonthsago.

Tables3and4summarizetheregressionresults.Sincemyfocusisprimarilyonthenewsvolume/volatilitycoefficients, theinterceptintheregressionequationandthemissingvaluedummycoefficient(whichisrarelystatisticallysignificant) areleftout.Table3presentstheresultsfortheEnglish-languagenewsandTable4presentstheresultsfornewsinChinese. IntheupperregressionslabelledNews,thenewsvolumeisthedependentvariableandinthelowerregressionslabelled

Volatility,thestockmarketvolatilityisthedependentvariable.Inbothregressions,thefirstexplanatoryvariable,ˇ1,is

alwaystheone-monthlaggedvalueoftheothervariable(i.e.volatilityintheupperregressionandnewsvolumeinthe lowerregression)andthesecondexplanatoryvariable,ˇ2,isalwaystheone-monthlaggedvalueofthedependentvariable.

IntheanalysisthatfollowsIthereforefocusonˇ1.Resultsforchangesfollowafterthoseforlevelsand*,**and***represent

significanceatthe10%,5%and1%level,respectively.

Overall,ˇ1isoften,butnotalways,positive.ItismuchmoreoftenpositiveintheVolatilityregression(inallbutfive

cases),i.e.laggednewsvolumeismorelikelyto(Granger)causevolatilitythanviceversa.FortheVolatilityregression,ˇ1

isstatisticallysignificantforroughlyhalfthemarket/language/searchstringcombinationsinTables3and4,andthereare 42caseswhennewsvolume(Granger)causesvolatilityandvolatilitydoesnotcausenewsvolume,butonly7caseswhen volatilitycausesnewsvolumeandnewsvolumedoesnotcausevolatility.Interestingly,theselatterseveninstancesareall foundinmainlandChinawhenthenewsisinEnglish.ThisisanindicationofEnglish-languagenewsnotreachingmainland Chinesestockmarketparticipants,oratleastthisnewsdoesnothelpinpredictingvolatility.Meanwhile,Chinesenews (Granger)causesvolatilityinmainlandChinajustasitdoesinmostotherstockmarkets.Asforˇ2,finally,itiswell-known

thatvolatilityispersistentandthatlaggedvolatilitypredictsfuturevolatilityandthisisevidentinmyregressionsinthe (almost)unanimouslysignificantˇ2coefficient.Interestingly,newsvolumeseemstobeaspersistentasvolatility.

(9)

Table3

ResultsofEnglish-LanguageNewsVolume–VolatilityRegressionsInthisTableIpresentresultsfromtheEnglish-languageregressions.Intheupper

regressions(News)thenewsvolumeisthedependentvariableandinthelowerregressions(Volatility)thestockmarketvolatilityisthedependent

variable.Inbothregressions,thefirstexplanatoryvariable,ˇ1,isalwaystheone-monthlaggedvalueoftheothervariable(i.e.volatilityintheupper

regressionandnewsvolumeinthelowerregression)andthesecondexplanatoryvariable,ˇ2,isalwaystheone-monthlaggedvalueofthedependent

variable.Eachregressionhasanunreportedinterceptandanunreporteddummyformissingvalues(whichisrarelysignificant).*,**and***represent

significanceatthe10%,5%and1%level,respectively.Theregressionsarebasedon105monthlyobservationsfromSeptember11,2006toSeptember1,

2014andtheresultsarepresentedbothforlevelsandforchanges.

NewsinEnglish(Levels)

Stockmarket Stockmarketcrash

Dependentvariable ˇ1 ˇ2 ˇR2 ˇ1 ˇ2 ˇR2 MSCI News −0.11* 0.88*** 0.70 0.12 0.42*** 0.25 Volatility 0.058 0.49*** 0.62 0.11* 0.42*** 0.62 S&P500 News −0.080 0.88*** 0.70 0.22 0.35*** 0.26 Volatility 0.083 0.61*** 0.65 0.14* 0.54*** 0.65 DJIA News −0.090 0.88*** 0.70 0.17 0.38*** 0.25 Volatility 0.086* 0.54*** 0.64 0.14** 0.47*** 0.64 NASDAQ News −0.066 0.87*** 0.70 0.20 0.36*** 0.26 Volatility 0.083 0.57*** 0.61 0.14** 0.49*** 0.62 Russell2000 News −0.080 0.87*** 0.70 0.092 0.45*** 0.25 Volatility 0.12** 0.69*** 0.63 0.22*** 0.58*** 0.64 FTSE100 News −0.080 0.88*** 0.70 0.186 0.37*** 0.26 Volatility 0.057 0.49*** 0.55 0.080 0.45*** 0.55 ShanghaiA News 0.10* 0.80*** 0.70 0.22** 0.44*** 0.29 Volatility 0.064 0.50*** 0.56 0.061 0.50*** 0.56 ShanghaiB News 0.079 0.82*** 0.70 0.24*** 0.43*** 0.29 Volatility 0.10 0.56*** 0.39 0.090 0.56*** 0.39 ShenzhenA News 0.083 0.82*** 0.70 0.18** 0.47*** 0.27 Volatility 0.10* 0.40*** 0.41 0.087 0.41*** 0.41 ShenzhenB News 0.066 0.83*** 0.70 0.21** 0.44*** 0.28 Volatility 0.055 0.43*** 0.38 0.055 0.42*** 0.38

HongKongH News −0.049 0.87*** 0.70 0.12 0.43*** 0.25

Volatility 0.13 0.71*** 0.51 0.023 0.76*** 0.50

HongKongRedChip News −0.035 0.86*** 0.70 0.15 0.41*** 0.25

Volatility 0.097 0.64*** 0.52 0.010 0.67*** 0.51 NewsinEnglish(Changes)

Stockmarket Stockmarketcrash

DependentVariable ˇ1 ˇ2 ˇR2 ˇ1 ˇ2 ˇR2 MSCI News −0.038 0.52*** 0.26 0.049 0.39*** 0.17 Volatility 0.058 0.34*** 0.39 0.11* 0.27*** 0.40 S&P500 News −0.014 0.52*** 0.26 0.071 0.38*** 0.17 Volatility 0.063 0.33*** 0.35 0.13** 0.26*** 0.37 DJIA News −0.028 0.52*** 0.26 0.032 0.40*** 0.17 Volatility 0.060 0.33*** 0.36 0.13** 0.26*** 0.38 NASDAQ News −0.019 0.52*** 0.26 0.056 0.39*** 0.17 Volatility 0.056 0.27*** 0.31 0.13** 0.21*** 0.34 Russell2000 News −0.007 0.52*** 0.26 0.007 0.42*** 0.16 Volatility 0.08* 0.30*** 0.37 0.14*** 0.22*** 0.40 FTSE100 News −0.011 0.52*** 0.26 0.056 0.39*** 0.17 Volatility 0.044 0.28*** 0.33 0.079 0.25*** 0.34 ShanghaiA News 0.13* 0.50*** 0.28 0.079 0.41*** 0.17 Volatility 0.026 0.11*** 0.12 0.029 0.10*** 0.12 ShanghaiB News 0.11 0.51*** 0.27 0.14 0.40*** 0.18 Volatility 0.060 0.12*** 0.09 0.035 0.12*** 0.08 ShenzhenA News 0.048 0.52*** 0.26 0.048 0.42*** 0.17 Volatility 0.043 0.11*** 0.12 0.017 0.10*** 0.11 ShenzhenB News 0.12 0.51*** 0.27 0.10 0.41*** 0.18 Volatility 0.025 0.12*** 0.11 0.022 0.11*** 0.11

HongKongH News 0.022 0.51*** 0.26 −0.035 0.44*** 0.17

Volatility 0.043 0.24*** 0.31 0.056 0.22*** 0.31

HongKongRedChip News 0.031 0.51*** 0.26 0.006 0.42*** 0.16

(10)

Table4

ResultsofChinese-LanguageNewsVolume-VolatilityRegressionsInthisTableIpresentresultsfromtheChinese-languageregressions.Intheupper regressions(News)thenewsvolumeisthedependentvariableandinthelowerregressions(Volatility)thestockmarketvolatilityisthedependent variable.Inbothregressions,thefirstexplanatoryvariable,ˇ1,isalwaystheone-monthlaggedvalueoftheothervariable(i.e.volatilityintheupper

regressionandnewsvolumeinthelowerregression)andthesecondexplanatoryvariable,ˇ2,isalwaystheone-monthlaggedvalueofthedependent

variable.Eachregressionhasanunreportedinterceptandanunreporteddummyformissingvalues(whichisrarelysignificant).*,**and***represent significanceatthe10%,5%and1%level,respectively.Theregressionsarebasedon51monthlyobservationsfromNovember1,2010toSeptember1,2014 andtheresultsarepresentedbothforlevelsandforchanges.

NewsinChinese(Levels)

(stockmarket) (stockmarket “collapse”) (stockmarket “crash”) Dependent Variable ˇ1 ˇ2 ˇR2 ˇ1 ˇ2 ˇR2 ˇ1 ˇ2 ˇR2 MSCI News 0.055 0.81*** 0.69 0.59*** 0.21 0.56 0.002 0.30** 0.09 Volatility 0.092** 0.26*** 0.60 0.11** 0.22*** 0.60 0.11** 0.29*** 0.61 S&P500 News 0.005 0.84*** 0.69 0.52*** 0.29** 0.54 0.012 0.30** 0.09 Volatility 0.098* 0.26*** 0.44 0.22*** 0.14** 0.51 0.17*** 0.24*** 0.54 DJIA News −0.0002 0.84*** 0.69 0.51*** 0.30** 0.53 0.013 0.30** 0.09 Volatility 0.084* 0.23*** 0.45 0.17*** 0.14** 0.51 0.15*** 0.22*** 0.54 NASDAQ News −0.002 0.84*** 0.69 0.49*** 0.33** 0.54 0.008 0.30** 0.09 Volatility 0.12** 0.23*** 0.36 0.24*** 0.11 0.45 0.20** 0.22*** 0.47 Russell2000 News 0.023 0.83*** 0.69 0.46*** 0.35** 0.52 0.054 0.31** 0.09 Volatility 0.14* 0.33*** 0.39 0.37*** 0.13 0.55 0.25*** 0.34*** 0.51 FTSE100 News 0.063 0.81*** 0.69 0.43*** 0.36** 0.50 0.001 0.30** 0.09 Volatility 0.12*** 0.21*** 0.55 0.14*** 0.16*** 0.53 0.076* 0.25*** 0.50 ShanghaiA News 0.10 0.82*** 0.70 0.051 0.69*** 0.40 0.12 0.30** 0.10 Volatility 0.035 0.050 0.02 0.074* 0.030 0.07 0.029 0.060 0.01 ShanghaiB News 0.10 0.81*** 0.70 0.14 0.60*** 0.42 0.033 0.30** 0.09 Volatility 0.13* 0.072 0.09 0.067 0.081 0.04 0.006 0.11* 0.02 ShenzhenA News 0.066 0.85*** 0.70 0.13 0.71*** 0.42 0.13 0.29** 0.11 Volatility 0.052 0.029 0.09 0.067 0.029 0.05 −0.016 0.039 0.00 ShenzhenB News 0.092 0.81*** 0.70 0.19 0.56*** 0.43 −0.065 0.30** 0.09 Volatility 0.11* 0.17*** 0.26 0.11* 0.14** 0.26 0.009 0.21*** 0.20

HongKongH News 0.074 0.82*** 0.70 0.26* 0.48*** 0.44 0.075 0.31** 0.10

Volatility 0.082 0.33*** 0.43 0.27*** 0.16** 0.57 0.084 0.34*** 0.43

HongKongRedChip News 0.071 0.82*** 0.70 0.24* 0.50*** 0.44 0.073 0.31** 0.10

Volatility 0.082 0.30** 0.43 0.27*** 0.15** 0.57 0.084 0.32*** 0.43

NewsinChinese(Changes)

(stockmarket) (stockmarket “collapse”) (stockmarket “crash”) Dependent Variable ˇ1 ˇ2 ˇR2 ˇ1 ˇ2 ˇR2 ˇ1 ˇ2 ˇR2 MSCI News 0.025 0.61*** 0.39 0.45*** 0.23 0.36 0.18 0.009 0.00 Volatility 0.039 0.25*** 0.39 0.16*** 0.16*** 0.48 0.19*** 0.19*** 0.57 S&P500 News −0.020 0.61*** 0.39 0.43*** 0.25* 0.35 0.14 0.025 0.00 Volatility 0.051 0.26*** 0.27 0.29*** 0.09 0.46 0.33*** 0.15*** 0.64 DJIA News −0.020 0.61*** 0.39 0.41*** 0.27* 0.34 0.14 0.027 0.00 Volatility 0.049 0.26*** 0.28 0.25*** 0.11** 0.44 0.31*** 0.16*** 0.61 NASDAQ News −0.011 0.61*** 0.39 0.44*** 0.25* 0.36 0.13 0.028 0.00 Volatility 0.059 0.20*** 0.20 0.27*** 0.06 0.40 0.31*** 0.11** 0.57 Russell2000 News −0.005 0.61*** 0.39 0.35** 0.31** 0.31 0.030 0.067 0.00 Volatility 0.051 0.24*** 0.22 0.33*** 0.05 0.52 0.31*** 0.15*** 0.61 FTSE100 News 0.026 0.61*** 0.39 0.34** 0.34** 0.31 0.12 0.042 0.00 Volatility 0.05 0.22*** 0.35 0.14*** 0.14*** 0.43 0.17*** 0.16*** 0.52 ShanghaiA News 0.034 0.62*** 0.39 0.13 0.55*** 0.24 0.041 0.077 0.00 Volatility −0.074** 0.025 0.08 0.049 0.030 0.02 0.049 0.04 0.03 ShanghaiB News 0.076 0.61*** 0.39 0.097 0.49*** 0.24 0.10 0.065 0.02 Volatility −0.039 0.090* 0.04 0.019 0.083 0.03 0.048 0.083* 0.04 ShenzhenA News 0.038 0.62*** 0.39 0.19 0.56*** 0.26 0.081 0.075 0.03 Volatility −0.058* 0.03 0.07 0.037 0.026 0.03 0.016 0.04 0.01 ShenzhenB News 0.046 0.62*** 0.39 0.14 0.46*** 0.24 0.065 0.068 0.03 Volatility −0.008 0.14*** 0.14 0.069 0.11** 0.18 0.061 0.13*** 0.17

HongKongH News 0.037 0.62*** 0.39 0.19 0.41*** 0.25 0.019 0.071 0.03

Volatility 0.011 0.26*** 0.44 0.18*** 0.16** 0.59 0.14*** 0.23*** 0.57

HongKongRedChip News 0.048 0.61*** 0.39 0.16 0.43*** 0.24 0.021 0.069 0.03

(11)

Asfortheeconomicsignificanceoftheresults,andhereIfocussolelyontheimpactofnewsonvolatility,thesizeofthe regressionparameterstellsusthat,forlevels,theaverageimpactofaone-standarddeviationchangeinnewsvolumeon nextmonth’sstockindexvolatilityis11basispoints(0.11%).Albeitnotlarge,theimpactiseconomicallymeaningfulwhen comparedtothemeanofthetwelvestockindexes’unconditionalvolatilityacrossthesampleperiod(coveringthevery volatilecredit-andtheeuro-areasovereigncrises)whichis123basispoints.Ofcourse,forsomemarket/language/search stringcombinationstheeconomicsignificanceoftheregressionparametersismuchlarger.FortheRussell2000indexofsmall USfirms,forinstance,theaverageimpactofaone-standarddeviationchangeinthevolumeofnewscontainingtheChinese word“ i.e.stockmarketcollapse”,onnextmonth’sstockindexvolatilityis37basispoints.Forchanges,theaverage impactofaone-standarddeviationchangeinnewsvolume,comparedtothe12-monthaverage,onnextmonth’schangein stockindexvolatilityis9basispoints.11Althoughsmaller,theimpactforchangesisactuallymoreeconomicallymeaningful thanthatforlevelswhencomparedtothesmallermeanofthemonthlychangeinthestockindexes’unconditionalvolatility whichis44basispoints.

Theregressionresultsinthissectionrevealthattheamountofnewsthismonthpredictsthevolatilitynextmonth.Thisis possiblyanindicationofnewsdissipatingfromnewssourcetomarketparticipantratherslowlyanditmirrorsresultsfound byEderingtonandLee(1993)intheinterestrateandforeignexchangemarkets.Likethestockmarket,thesetwomarketsalso exhibittime-varyingvolatilityandEderingtonandLee(1993)showsthatscheduledmacroeconomicnewsannouncements haveanimmediateeffectonpricesbutalonglastingeffectonpricevolatility.Inthestockmarket,anevenlonger-lasting periodofelevatedvolatilityafterannouncementsisfoundbyPatellandWolfson(1984).Thisgradualdigestionofnewsby themarketcouldliebehindthepredictabilityofvolatilityusingnews.

Arecurringfindinginthispaperisthatpessimistic(negative)newshasasomewhatstrongerconnectiontostockreturn volatilitythanneutralnews.ThecorrelationspresentedinTable2aregenerallylargerfornegativenews,regardlessof language,andthesameholdsfortheregressioncoefficient,ˇ1,inTables3and4.Ihavenoexplanationforthisotherthan

thepossibilitythatrisk-aversemarketparticipantsaremorepronetoreacttonegativethantoneutralnews.

Toconclude,themainfindinginthissectionisthattheinter-temporallinkbetweennewsandvolatilityisstatisticallyand economicallysignificantandthatitseemstobestrongerinthedirectionfromnewstovolatilitythanviceversa.Asecondary findingisthatthepatternisdifferentinmainlandChinawherethereislessofapositiveinter-temporallinkbetweennews andvolatilityandwhere,particularlyEnglish-language,newsdoesnothelpinpredictingvolatility.

3.3. Out-of-sampleforecastingofstockmarketvolatilityusingnewsvolumes

Theregressionsintheprevioussectionshowthatnewscausesvolatilityandthatnewsvolumespossiblycouldbeusedto predictfuturestockmarketvolatility.Whileanyforecasting-assessmentbasedontheregressionsabovearemereindications basedonin-sampleevidence,inthissectionItrytoassesswhethernewshastrueout-of-samplepredictiveabilities.Since Ididnotfindvolatilityto(Granger)causenewsvolumeIfocussolelyonvolatilityprediction.Idothisthrougharolling windowestimationoftheOLSregressionparametersintheprevioussectionwhereonlypastinformationisusedtopredict future(one-monthahead)volatility.Thesampleisdividedintotwo(essentially)equallylongperiods,oneestimationperiod andoneevaluationperiod.12Thevolatilityisthenforecastedintwoways;(i)basedsolelyonpastvolatility(Withoutnews) or(ii)basedonpastvolatilitytogetherwithpastnewsvolume(Withnews).

Theforecastingperformance isassessedusingtwodifferentlossfunctions;themeanabsoluteerror(MAE)andthe quasi-likelihood(QL)lossfunction.Thetwolossfunctionsaredefinedas

MAE=

realized,t+1−forecast,t

(1)

and QL= realized,t+1 forecast,t −log

realized,t+1 forecast,t

−1 (2)

whereforecast,tistheforecastatmonthtofthevolatilityinmontht+1usinginformationavailableuptoandincluding montht.

Forecastingresults,forlevelsaswellasforchanges,arepresentedinTables5and6.13WhileTable5presentresultsfor English-languagenews,Table6presentsthesameresultsfornewsinChinese.Thesmallest(best)forecastingerror/lossis typedinboldandmoreoftenthannot,theinclusionofnews(Withnews)inthepredictionimprovesthevolatilityforecast. ForEnglishnewstheforecastisimprovedforeachandeverystockindexwhentheamountofnewsisacknowledged.This strongresultholdsbothforlevelsandforchanges.Meanwhile,theinclusionofChinese-languagenewsislessusefulfor

11Whennolaggedvolatilityisincludedintheregression,unreportedregressionsshowthattheaverageimpactofaone-standarddeviationchangein newsvolumeonnextmonth’sstockindexvolatilityis28basispointsandtheaverageimpactforchangesis16basispoints.

12Somewhatarbitrarily,IhavechosentolettheevaluationperiodfortheEnglishnews-basedforecastingstartatthesamedateastheChinesenews collectionstarts,i.e.November1,2010.Thisleaves51monthsintheevaluationperiodand54monthsintheestimationperiod.TheChinesenews-based forecastingstartsonOctober29,2012whichleaves25monthsintheevaluationperiodand26monthsintheestimationperiod.

(12)

Table5

ResultsofVolatilityForecastsusingEnglish-LanguageNewsVolumesInthisTableIpresentstockreturnvolatilityforecastingresultsforEnglish-language newsvolumes.Intotal,51monthlyforecastsaremadeineachcategoryandallforecastsarebasedonregressionparametersestimatedusingarolling

windowof54monthlyobservationsstartingfromNovember1,2010toSeptember1,2014.Thenumbersintherowslabelled(Withoutnews)arethe

oneswhentheone-monthlaggednewsvolumeisnotincludedinthepredictionandthenumbersintherowslabelled(Withnews)aretheoneswhenthe

one-monthlaggednewsvolumeisincludedinadditiontoone-monthlaggedstockreturnvolatility.MAEisthemeanabsoluteerrorandQListheQLloss function.Thesmallest(best)forecastingerror/lossistypedinboldandtheresultsarepresentedbothforlevelsandforchanges.

NewsinEnglish(Levels)

Stockmarket Stockmarketcrash

MAE(×10−5) QL MAE(×10−5) QL

MSCI Withoutnews 2.13 0.0244 2.13 0.0244

Withnews 1.80 0.0183 1.56 0.0142

S&P500 Withoutnews 2.91 0.0322 2.91 0.0322

Withnews 2.42 0.0235 1.77 0.0135

DJIA Withoutnews 2.45 0.0249 2.45 0.0249

Withnews 2.13 0.0195 1.40 0.0093

NASDAQ Withoutnews 4.37 0.0646 4.37 0.0646

Withnews 3.74 0.0505 3.51 0.0456

Russell2000 Withoutnews 4.69 0.0470 4.69 0.0470

Withnews 4.00 0.0363 2.88 0.0207

FTSE100 Withoutnews 2.46 0.0247 2.46 0.0247

Withnews 1.88 0.0154 1.66 0.0123

ShanghaiA Withoutnews 3.78 0.0225 3.78 0.0225

Withnews 2.82 0.0134 2.95 0.0146

ShanghaiB Withoutnews 6.37 0.0650 6.37 0.0650

Withnews 4.83 0.0418 5.59 0.0529

ShenzhenA Withoutnews 6.90 0.0483 6.90 0.0483

Withnews 6.09 0.0393 6.39 0.0426

ShenzhenB Withoutnews 6.46 0.1678 6.46 0.1678

Withnews 5.96 0.1505 5.91 0.1487

HongKongH Withoutnews 2.81 0.0111 2.81 0.0111

Withnews 2.39 0.0082 1.38 0.0029

HongKongRedChip Withoutnews 2.96 0.0166 2.96 0.0166

Withnews 2.38 0.0112 2.02 0.0084

NewsinEnglish(changes)

Stockmarket Stockmarketcrash

MAE(×10−3) QL MAE(×10−3) QL

MSCI Withoutnews 1.24 0.1056 1.24 0.1056

Withnews 1.15 0.0863 0.77 0.0320

S&P500 Withoutnews 1.91 0.2377 1.91 0.2377

Withnews 1.81 0.2019 1.08 0.0507

DJIA Withoutnews 1.95 0.2602 1.95 0.2602

Withnews 1.85 0.2202 1.21 0.0679

NASDAQ Withoutnews 3.92 0.3364 3.92 0.3364

Withnews 3.83 0.3126 3.66 0.2711

Russell2000 Withoutnews 3.25 0.3327 3.25 0.3327

Withnews 3.16 0.3038 2.68 0.1841

FTSE100 Withoutnews 1.08 0.0901 1.08 0.0901

Withnews 1.04 0.0814 0.39 0.0083

ShanghaiA Withoutnews 0.69 0.0865 0.69 0.0865

Withnews 0.66 0.0749 0.35 0.0164

ShanghaiB Withoutnews 1.14 0.1074 1.14 0.1074

Withnews 1.01 0.0774 0.96 0.0676

ShenzhenA Withoutnews 2.78 0.7350 2.78 0.7350

Withnews 2.66 0.6132 2.62 0.5785

ShenzhenB Withoutnews 4.83 0.2569 4.83 0.2569

Withnews 4.78 0.2481 4.70 0.2362

HongKongH Withoutnews 0.96 0.0767 0.96 0.0767

Withnews 0.91 0.0665 0.37 0.0083

HongKongRedChip Withoutnews 1.14 0.1092 1.14 0.1092

(13)

Table6

ResultsofVolatilityForecastsusingChinese-LanguageNewsVolumesInthisTableIpresentstockreturnvolatilityforecastingresultsforChinese-language newsvolumes.Intotal,25monthlyforecastsaremadeineachcategoryandallforecastsarebasedonregressionparametersestimatedusingarolling windowof26monthlyobservationsstartingfromOctober29,2012toSeptember1,2014.Thenumbersintherowslabelled(Withoutnews)aretheones whentheone-monthlaggednewsvolumeisnotincludedinthepredictionandthenumbersintherowslabelled(Withnews)aretheoneswhenthe one-monthlaggednewsvolumeisincludedinadditiontoone-monthlaggedstockreturnvolatility.MAEisthemeanabsoluteerrorandQListheQLloss function.Thesmallest(best)forecastingerror/lossistypedinboldandtheresultsarepresentedbothforlevelsandforchanges.

NewsinChinese(Levels)

(stockmarket) (stockmarket “collapse”)

(stockmarket “crash”)

MAE(×10−5) QL MAE(×10−5) QL MAE(×10−5) QL

MSCI Withoutnews 5.82 0.0400 5.82 0.0400 5.82 0.0400

Withnews 4.91 0.0301 5.47 0.0361 4.71 0.0280

S&P500 Withoutnews 7.49 0.0473 7.49 0.0473 7.49 0.0473

Withnews 6.82 0.0405 6.56 0.0380 7.73 0.0497

DJIA Withoutnews 5.90 0.0329 5.90 0.0329 5.90 0.0329

Withnews 5.31 0.0276 5.30 0.0275 6.35 0.0372

NASDAQ Withoutnews 13.6 0.1210 13.6 0.1210 13.6 0.1210

Withnews 12.7 0.1104 12.7 0.110 14.9 0.1375

Russell2000 Withoutnews 13.7 0.0823 13.7 0.0823 13.7 0.0823

Withnews 14.6 0.0905 13.3 0.0787 13.1 0.0769

FTSE100 Withoutnews 5.90 0.0325 5.90 0.0325 5.90 0.0325

Withnews 4.59 0.0212 6.53 0.0386 3.06 0.0103

ShanghaiA Withoutnews 7.61 0.0221 7.61 0.0221 7.61 0.0221

Withnews 7.70 0.0225 7.04 0.0192 7.87 0.0234

ShanghaiB Withoutnews 7.55 0.0267 7.55 0.0267 7.55 0.0267

Withnews 7.72 0.0277 7.98 0.0294 6.44 0.0203

ShenzhenA Withoutnews 10.9 0.0318 10.9 0.0318 10.9 0.0318

Withnews 11.2 0.0330 11.0 0.0322 8.70 0.0215

ShenzhenB Withoutnews 9.10 0.0998 9.10 0.0998 9.10 0.0998

Withnews 8.42 0.0889 9.17 0.1009 4.79 0.0898

HongKongH Withoutnews 10.6 0.0326 10.6 0.0326 10.6 0.0326

Withnews 9.64 0.0276 10.1 0.0297 10.6 0.0322

HongKongRedChip Withoutnews 7.65 0.0252 7.65 0.0252 7.65 0.0252

Withnews 8.08 0.0276 6.69 0.0199 4.94 0.0116

NewsinChinese(Changes)

(stockmarket) (stockmarket “collapse”)

(stockmarket “crash”)

MAE(×10−3) QL MAE(×10−3) QL MAE(×10−3) QL

MSCI Withoutnews 1.99 0.0571 1.99 0.0571 1.99 0.0571

Withnews 1.86 0.0480 2.52 0.1043 1.77 0.0425

S&P500 Withoutnews 5.19 0.6378 5.19 0.6378 5.19 0.6378

Withnews 5.17 0.6245 5.23 0.6542 6.10 1.3033

DJIA Withoutnews 5.21 0.6697 5.21 0.6697 5.21 0.6697

Withnews 5.15 0.6381 5.35 0.7447 6.02 1.2770

NASDAQ Withoutnews 13.0 3.2917 13.0 3.2917 13.0 3.2917

Withnews 13.0 3.2835 12.9 3.1819 14.0 7.0598

Russell2000 Withoutnews 9.88 1.8001 9.88 1.8001 9.88 1.8001

Withnews 9.93 1.8603 9.50 1.4474 9.21 1.2339

FTSE100 Withoutnews 2.28 0.0983 2.28 0.0983 2.28 0.0983

Withnews 2.22 0.0919 3.06 0.2260 0.50 0.0031

ShanghaiA Withoutnews 3.17 1.2796 3.17 1.2796 3.17 1.2796

Withnews 3.13 1.2003 3.65 2.9913 4.23 19.926

ShanghaiB Withoutnews 0.91 0.0114 0.91 0.0114 0.91 0.0114

Withnews 0.56 0.0040 1.60 0.0416 0.62 0.0050

ShenzhenA Withoutnews 6.06 0.9781 6.06 0.9781 6.06 0.9781

Withnews 6.74 1.6757 6.57 1.4629 5.36 0.5843

ShenzhenB Withoutnews 8.53 0.1660 8.53 0.1660 8.53 0.1660

Withnews 9.25 0.2118 9.01 0.1955 6.46 0.0783

HongKongH Withoutnews 3.06 0.2712 3.06 0.2712 3.06 0.2712

Withnews 3.35 0.3636 3.54 0.4415 3.47 0.4124

HongKongRedChip Withoutnews 2.52 0.1358 2.52 0.1358 2.52 0.1358

(14)

Table7

CorrelationsbetweenNewsVolumeandVolatility:RobustnessAsarobustnesstest,inthisTableIpresentNewsVolume–Volatilitycorrelationsforthe MSCIWorldstockindexwhennewsvolumesarecollectedbyGoogleNewsinEnglishandChinese,respectively.InthefirstpartoftheTableItestthe robustnessoftheresultsinthepapertotheremovalofextremeobservations,crisisobservationsandmissingobservationsandinthesecondpartItest therobustnessoftheresultstoslightchangestothenewsvolumecollectionprocess.Resultsarepresentedbothforlevelsandforchanges.

NewsinEnglish(Levels)

Stockmarket Stockmarketcrash

MSCI

ExcludingExtremes 0.18** 0.35***

ExcludingCrisis −0.04 0.53***

ExcludingMissing 0.47*** 0.79***

NewsinEnglish(Changes)

Stockmarket Stockmarketcrash

MSCI

ExcludingExtremes 0.20** 0.50***

ExcludingCrisis 0.11 0.50***

ExcludingMissing 0.18** 0.72***

NewsinChinese(Levels)

(stockmarket) (stockmarket“collapse”) (stockmarket“crash”)

MSCI ExcludingExtremes 0.44*** 0.57*** 0.07

MSCI ExcludingMissing 0.46*** 0.77*** 0.26**

NewsinChinese(Changes)

(stockmarket) (stockmarket“collapse”) (stockmarket“crash”)

MSCI ExcludingExtremes 0.05 0.27** 0.24**

MSCI ExcludingMissing 0.06 0.65** 0.40***

Levels

“stockmarketcrash” Globalstockmarketcrash

(stockmarket“slump”)

MSCI 0.67*** 0.71*** 0.54*** S&P500 0.66*** 0.69*** 0.49*** DJIA 0.68*** 0.71*** 0.51*** NASDAQ 0.64*** 0.66*** 0.46*** Russell2000 0.56*** 0.60*** 0.41*** FTSE100 0.71*** 0.75*** 0.55*** ShanghaiA 0.29*** 0.30*** 0.30** ShanghaiB 0.31*** 0.32*** 0.33*** ShenzhenA 0.21** 0.23*** 0.27** ShenzhenB 0.31*** 0.33*** 0.40*** HongKongH 0.69*** 0.72*** 0.38***

HongKongRedChip 0.65*** 0.69*** 0.47***

Changes

“stockmarketcrash” Globalstockmarketcrash

(stockmarket“slump”)

MSCI 0.60*** 0.73*** 0.48*** S&P500 0.51*** 0.65*** 0.41*** DJIA 0.50*** 0.65*** 0.42*** NASDAQ 0.49*** 0.61*** 0.37*** Russell2000 0.48*** 0.59*** 0.34*** FTSE100 0.50*** 0.68*** 0.43*** ShanghaiA 0.11 0.16* 0.26** ShanghaiB 0.18** 0.20** 0.24*** ShenzhenA 0.03 0.07 0.25** ShenzhenB 0.18** 0.25*** 0.33*** HongKongH 0.43*** 0.61*** 0.35***

References

Related documents

60 74 Male retroperitoneal and inguinal lymphadenitis, psoas abscess Inguinal lymph node biopsy chlorambucil, prednisone, fludarabine, rituximab, cyclophosphamide,

It should be remembered that consistent training workflow, especially through mentorship, is more effective than the simultaneous study of the entire spectrum of

The primary three goals of the DAM system have been set up to address the main interests of BlitzCorp: 1) organize digital assets to provide a digital platform to quickly acquire and

References in this Base Prospectus to the relevant Dealer shall, in the case of an issue of Notes being (or intended to be) subscribed by more than one Dealer, be to all

In fact, within certain religious traditions, the act of visiting a nearby pilgrim- age site is regarded as having less spiritual merit than that of undergoing the hardships of

As a retail specialist, Javelin Group combines the traditional scope of commercial due diligence (market, competitors, customers, proposition) with all elements of

• Office File Format : MS-Word, Power Point, Excel, Acrobat Viewer, HTML Viewer (Viewer Only) • etc : HTML, XML, JAVA, Flash.. MagicNet transmits media files (photo, audio and

The goal of the AP Environmental Science course is to provide students with the scientific principles, concepts, and methodologies required to understand the interrelationships of