• No results found

Comparative Analysis of Microstrip patch antenna arrays for S band applications

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Comparative Analysis of Microstrip patch antenna arrays for S band applications"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Volume 8, No. 5, May-June 2017

International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science RESEARCH PAPER

Available Online at www.ijarcs.info

Comparative Analysis of Microstrip patch antenna arrays for S band applications

Jasmine

Dept. of Electronics and Communication Engineering J.C.D.M. College of Engineering

Sirsa, India

Manish Mehta

Dept. of Electronics and Communication Engineering J.C.D.M. College of Engineering

Sirsa, India

Abstract: This paper presents a comparative analysis of 2×2 antenna array of rectangular topology, U-slot and E- slot microstrip patch antenna array . The operating frequency of array is 2 to 4 GHz. The antenna arrays have been designed and simulated on Rogers RO4350 (tm) substrate with a dielectric constant of 3.66. This paper presents that, the performance of antenna array is improved after the slot cutting in the patch of antenna. The design is analyzed by FEM based HFSSv11 by which return loss, 3D polar plot, VSWR, gain and radiated power of the antenna arrays are computed. The software simulated results shows that the E slot antenna array provides good performance as compared to U slot antenna array and rectangular patch antenna array with the return loss value of -36.082dB at 2.41GHz and VSWR value 0.2727 at the same frequency.

Keywords: Microstrip patch antenna, HFSS, return loss, VSWR, 3D polar plot, gain, directivity.

I.INTRODUCTION

Antennas play a very important role in modern communication systems, as they are the most important components to create a communication link .Microstrip patch antennas are widely used in communication systems because of, they are low profile, of light weight, of low volume, having low fabrication cost, conformal design, low power handling capacity, can be easily integrated with microwave integrated circuits (MICs), supports linear as well as circular polarization. They can be designed in a variety of shapes in order to obtain enhanced gain and bandwidth [1].

Antenna array is a set of multiple connected antennas and arranged in a regular structure to form a single antenna. Phased array antenna is a multiple antenna system in which the direction of maximum transmission or reception can be altered by electrical switching means. In these arrays, the radiated energy is highly concentrated in a particular direction and strongly suppressed for other directions [2]. The major advantages of antenna arrays are:

• An antenna array can achieve higher

and than could be achieved by a single

antenna.

• Arrays can be used to give path

called

multiply link capacity.

• They can be used for

achieve many other signal processing functions like spatial filtering, target tracking etc.

• Arrays are generally used for

Slot antenna is an important configuration among all the various existing configurations in communication system.

It consists of a

cut out. When the plate is

frequency, the slot radiates

similar to a

Slot antennas are widely used in

communications, which is an application of S band spectrum. Slotted antennas are generally used at UHF and microwave frequencies. A slot antenna's main advantages are its size, design simplicity and it is capable of dual and triple frequency operations .

The proposed antenna array is suitable for various modern wireless communication system applications like WiMax Services, RADAR, fixed satellite services operating in the frequency range of 2-4 GHz where antenna with low profile, small size, light weight and broad pattern is required.

II. DESIGNCONSIDERATIONS

TABLE 1: Design Parameters and corresponding values

Design Parameters Value

Operating frequency 2-4 GHz

Dielectric constant of substrate 3.66

Length of the substrate 71mm

Width of the substrate 52mm

Length of the patch 35.5mm

Width of the patch 26mm

Array size 2×2

Radius of coax pin 0.7mm

Height of the coax pin 5mm

The above design considerations are same for all the three antenna arrays. These values are calculated by finite element

modeling (FEM). Finite element modeling (FEM) is a

(2)

A. Design of rectangular microstrip patch antenna array

Fig.1: 2×2 Rectangular microstrip patch antenna array design (original image from HFSSv11)

The above figure represents 2×2 rectangular microstrip patch antenna array design. The method used to analyze antenna is FEM (Finite Element Modeling) and the feeding technique used is Probe Feeding. The spacing between elements is 5mm.

Simulation results using HFSS:

The below figures represent various results like Return loss, VSWR, 3D Polar plot, radiation pattern during simulation-

1) Return loss:

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00

Freq [GHz] -20.00

-15.00 -10.00 -5.00 0.00

d

B(S(P1

,

P1

))

Ansoft Corporation XY Plot 1 HFSSDesign1

m1

Curve Info

dB(S(P1,P1)) Setup1 : Sweep1

Name X Y

[image:2.595.39.274.53.239.2]

m1 4.0000 -19.5811

Fig.2: Return loss of 2×2 rectangular microstrip antenna array

Figure 2 represents the return loss of -19.5811db at the frequency of 4 GHz.

2) VSWR:

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 Freq [GHz]

0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00

d

B(VSW

R

(P1

))

Ansoft Corporation XY Plot 2 HFSSDesign1

m1

Curve Info dB(VSWR(P1)) Setup1 : Sw eep1

Name X Y

[image:2.595.322.553.54.197.2]

m1 4.0000 1.8297

Fig.3: VSWR of 2×2 rectangular microstrip antenna array

Figure no.3 represents the VSWR of 1.8297 for the corresponding frequency of 4GHz.

[image:2.595.315.467.271.399.2]

3) 3D Polar plot:

Fig.4: 3D polar plot of 2×2 rectangular microstrip antenna array

The above figure represents the gain of 1.6355 dB for the rectangular patch antenna array.

4) Radiation pattern

-9.00 -3.00 3.00 9.00

90 60 30 0

-30

-60

-90

-120

-150

-180 150

120

Ansoft Corporation Radiation Pattern 1 HFSSDesign1

Curve Info dB(GainTotal) Setup1 : Sw eep1 Phi='0deg'

[image:2.595.36.284.379.602.2]

dB(GainTotal) Setup1 : Sw eep1 Phi='90deg'

[image:2.595.320.480.491.663.2]
(3)

B. Design of U slot microstrip patch antenna array

Fig.6: 2×2 U slot Microstrip patch antenna array design

Simulation results using HFSS: 1) Return loss:

The graph for return loss of U slot microstrip patch antnna array is shown in next figure(Fig.7).

1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50

Freq [GHz] -35.00

-30.00 -25.00 -20.00 -15.00 -10.00 -5.00 0.00

d

B(S(P1

,

P1

))

Ansoft Corporation XY Plot 1 HFSSDesign1

m1

Curve Info

dB(S(P1,P1)) Setup1 : Sweep1

Name X Y

m1 2.3900 -33.1975

Fig.7: Return loss of 2×2 U slot microstrip antenna array The above figure represents the value of return loss which is equal to -33.1975 db at the frequency of 2.39 GHz.

2) VSWR:

1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50

Freq [GHz] 0.00

5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00

d

B(VSW

R

(P1

))

Ansoft Corporation XY Plot 2 HFSSDesign1

m1

Curve Info

dB(VSWR(P1)) Setup1 : Sweep1

Name X Y

m1 2.3900 0.3802

Fig.8: VSWR of 2×2 U slot microstrip antenna array

The value of VSWR corresponding to the frequency of 2.39GHz is 0.3802 which is a much improved value as compared to VSWR of rectangular microstrip patch antenna array.

3) 3D polar plot:

Fig.9: 3D Polar plot of 2×2 U slot microstrip antenna array

This figure represents the value of gain attained by U slot microstrip patch antenna array which is 5.013 dB . This value is very high as compared to the gain attained by rectangular patch microstrip antenna array.

4) diation pattern:

-18.00 -11.00 -4.00 3.00

90 60 30 0 -30

-60

-90

-120

-150 -180

150 120

Ansoft Corporation Radiation Pattern 3 HFSSDesign1

Curve Info dB(GainTotal) Setup1 : Sw eep1 Phi='0deg'

dB(GainTotal) Setup1 : Sw eep1 Phi='90deg'

Fig.10: Radiation pattern of 2×2 U slot microstrip antenna array

(4)
[image:4.595.34.281.53.251.2]

C. Design of E slot microstrip patch antenna array

Fig.11: 2×2 E slot microstrip antenna array design

Simulation results using HFSS: 1) Return loss:

1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50

Freq [GHz] -40.00

-35.00 -30.00 -25.00 -20.00 -15.00 -10.00 -5.00 0.00

d

B(S(P1

,P1

))

Ansoft Corporation XY Plot 1 HFSSDesign1

m1

Curve Info dB(S(P1,P1)) Setup1 : Sw eep1 Name X Y

[image:4.595.38.280.286.479.2]

m1 2.4100 -36.0824

Fig.12: Return loss of 2×2 E- slot microstrip patch antenna array

The above figure represents the value of return loss for 2×2 E slot microstrip patch antenna array design and it is equal to -36.082db at 2.41GHz.

2) VSWR:

1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50

Freq [GHz] 0.00

5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00

d

B(VSW

R

(P1

))

Ansoft Corporation XY Plot 2 HFSSDesign1

m1

Curve Info dB(VSWR(P1)) Setup1 : Sw eep1 Name X Y

[image:4.595.318.485.288.416.2]

m1 2.4100 0.2727

Fig.13: VSWR of 2×2 E-slot microstrip patch antenna array

The value of VSWR corresponding to the frequency of 2.41GHz is 0.2727 which is an improved value as compared to VSWR of U slot microstrip patch antenna array.

3) 3D Polar plot:

Fig.14: 3D Polar plot of 2×2 E slot microstrip antenna array

This figure represents the value of gain attained by E slot microstrip patch antenna array which is 5.855 dB.

4) Radiation pattern:

-14.00 -8.00 -2.00 4.00

90 60 30 0 -30

-60

-90

-120

-150 -180

150 120

Ansoft Corporation Radiation Pattern 1 HFSSDesign1

Curve Info dB(GainTotal) Setup1 : Sw eep1 Phi='0deg'

dB(GainTotal) Setup1 : Sw eep1 Phi='90deg'

Fig.15: Radiation pattern of 2×2 E slot microstrip patch antenna array

[image:4.595.38.282.519.710.2]

The simulation results indicate that 2×2 E slot antenna array has better performance in terms of return loss, VSWR, gain and directivity as compared to 2×2 U slot microstrip antenna array. Here, with the help of a comparison table, a comparison is made between the three arrays performance parameters such as return loss, VSWR, gain and radiated power.

TABLE 2: Comparison table Performance

Parameters

Rectangular patch

U slot E slot

Return loss(dB)

-19.5811 -33.1975 -36.082

VSWR 1.8297 0.3802 0.2727

Gain(dB) 1.6355 5.013 5.855

Radiated power(W)

0.0784 0.9185 0.9563

[image:4.595.310.567.551.655.2]
(5)

III.COMPARISONGRAPHS:

1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 -40

-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5

R

et

ur

n l

os

s

(dB

)

Frequency (GHz)

Rectangular patch(without slot) U slot

E slot

Fig.16: Showing variation in the return loss values of the three antenna arrays

1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

VSW

R

Frequency (GHz)

Rectangular patch(without slot) U slot

E slot

Fig.17: Showing variation in the VSWR of the three antenna arrays

-250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 -25

-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10

G

ai

n(

dB

)

angle (deg)

Rectangular patch(without slot) U slot

E slot

Fig.18: Showing variation in the gain values of the three antenna arrays

-200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300

0.00 0.07 0.14 0.21 0.28 0.35 0.42 0.49 0.56 0.63 0.70 0.77 0.84 0.91 0.98 1.05

R

ad

iat

ed pow

er

(W

)

Angle(deg)

Rectangular patch(without slot) U slot

E slot

Fig.19: Showing variation in the radiated power of the three antenna arrays

IV.CONCLUSION

In this paper, a comparative analysis of the three antenna arrays having the same size and design considerations, is presented. The simulation results indicates that the E slot antenna array has better results as compared to rectangular patch antenna array and U slot antenna array. E slot antenna array has return loss value -36.082dB at 2.41GHz, VSWR value is 0.2727 and gain is 5.855 dB.

V. REFERENCES

[1] M. Vasujadevi, Dr. P. Siddaiah and S Nagakishore Bhavanam "Rectangular Patch Antenna Array Design at 13GHz Frequency Using HFSS14.0". Springer India : Advancements of Medical Electronics, Chapter : 24, ISSN : 2195-2728, ISBN : 978-81-322-2255-2, ISBN : 978-81-

322-2256-9 (eBook), Springer Book Publications, January 2015, pp.263-270.

[2] Vasujadevi Midasala and Dr. P. Siddaiah, “Microstrip Patch Antenna Array Design To Improve Better Gains”, proc. International Conference on Computational Modeling and Security(CMS 2016), pp. 401-409.

[3] J. S. Herd and A. J. Fenn, “Design considerations for space-based radar phased arrays”, in Proc. IEEE MTT-S Int. Microw. MTT-Symp. Dig., Jun12-17, 2005, p. 4. [4]. T. Clark and E. Jaska, “Million element ISIS array,” in

Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Phased Array Syst. Technol. (ARRAY),Oct.12-15,2010,pp.29-36.

[5]. Rajat Arora, Ajay Kumar, Saleem Khan and Sandeep Arya, “ Finite Element Modeling and Design of Rectangular Patch Antenna with Different Feeding Techniques”, Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol.1, pp.11-17,2013.

(6)

[7]. M. Surita and A. Marwaha, “Finite Element Analysis for Optimizing Antenna for Microwave Coagulation

Figure

Fig.2: Return loss of 2×2 rectangular microstrip antenna Freq [GHz]array
Fig.15: Radiation pattern of 2×2 E slot microstrip patch antenna array

References

Related documents

We here address the modelling of an aerosol hitting the walls of the airways or an endotra- cheal tube used for a mechanical ventilation, and the possible creation of secondary

The purpose of this paper is to present empirical data on how the variation in regulating clinical research and patient care is perceived in Finland. We studied i) whether

applied to actual SNF data, such as the EIA data discussed in chapter 3 and used to calculate the decay heat per MTU of SNF (watts/MTU). The calculated decay heat values could then

Many researchers have proved that BELIEF plays a major role in learning process than the REASONING. This brings in the MISCONCEPTION factor in to picture which seems to have

This project aims at developing a self-charging electric vehicle which generates the electric power required to drive the vehicle during the running condition by the means of

Earth Planets Space, 50, 63?80, 1998 ULF pulsations observed by the ETS VI satellite Substorm associated azimuthal Pc 4 pulsations on the nightside M Nose?1, T Iyemori1, S Nakabe1,

Moreover, the possibility of having a power supply interruption of end-customers connected to a low voltage (LV) distribution grid is diminished since adjacent

Alternatively, TCP Vegas uses the congestion avoidance algorithm to prevent packet loss by decreasing its (WND) as soon as it detects an incipient congestion Thus, the