• No results found

Evaluation of Some Centered Polygonal Numbers by Using the Division Algorithm

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Evaluation of Some Centered Polygonal Numbers by Using the Division Algorithm"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Vol. 10, 2017, 83-88

ISSN: 2349-0632 (P), 2349-0640 (online) Published 11 December 2017

www.researchmathsci.org

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22457/jmi.v10a11

83

Journal of

Evaluation of Some Centered Polygonal Numbers by

Using the Division Algorithm

V. Pandichelvi1 and P. Sivakamasundari2

1

Department of Mathematics, Urumu Dhanalakshmi College Trichy, Tamilnadu, India

e-mail: [email protected]

2

Department of Mathematics, BDUCC, Lalgudi, Trichy, India. e-mail: [email protected]

Received 2 November 2017; accepted 7 December 2017

Abstract. In this communication, we find centered square number, centered octagonal number, centered dodecagonal number, centered hexadecagonal number and tetradecagonal number by using division algorithm.

Keywords: Division algorithm, centered polygonal numbers AMS Mathematics Subject Classification (2010): 11D99

1. Introduction

In [1] a function A: NN is defined by A

( )

n =m where m is the smallest natural

number such that

= + n k

k m divides n

1

2 . In [2] a function ) (n

A such that A(n)=m

where mis the smallest natural number such that

= =

+

+ n

k n

k

k m and k m divides n

1 3

1

are given. In this communication, we obtain a function A(n) such that A(n)=m where mis some centered polygonal numbers, such that 2PPn divides

) (acubical polynomial m+

Notations:

( )

n n

PPn = 3+ 2 1

be a pentagonal pyramidal number of rank n

1 2 2 2− +

= n n

CSn be a centered square number of rank

n

1 4

4 2 − +

= n n

(2)

84 1

6 6 2− +

= n n

CDn be a centered dodecagonal number of rank n

1 7

7 2 − +

= n n

CTn be a centered tetradecagonal number of rank n

1 8 8 2− +

= n n

CHn be a centered Hexadecagonal number of rank

n

2. Method of analysis

SECTION A: Evaluation of centered square number

Let A: NN be defined by A

( )

n =m where

m

is the smallest natural number such

that 2PPn divides m+

(

n3−2n2 +3n−1

)

. If 2PPndivides

(

n3−2n2+3n−1

)

,

then A(n)=2n2 −2n+1, otherwise A(n)=

(

2n2−2n+1

)

r where r is the least

non negative remainder when

(

n3−2n2+3n−1

)

is divided by 2PPn. Hence Ais defined for all

n

. By division algorithm such remainder is given by

(

n3−2n2 +3n−1

)

−2qPPn where q is the quotient when

(

n3−2n2 +3n−1

)

is divided by 2PPn and is given by the greatest integer function of

(

)

n PP

n n n

2

1 3 2 2 3 +

,

That is

   

  

+

=

n PP

n n n q

2

1 3 2 2 3

Hence,

(

) (

)

   

   

+ ×

   

   

+

− + − − − + − − +

= 3

3 2 3 2

3

3 2 3 1 2 3 1 )

( n n

n n

n n n n

n n n n n A

(

)

3

3 2

3 3 2

3

3 2 2 1

1 3 2 )

( n n

n n

n n

n n

n n n

n n n n n

A × +

   

   

+ + − −

    

  

+ + + + − + − + =

(

)

3

3 2

2 2 2 1

1 1 2 2 )

( n n

n n

n n n

n n

A × +

   

   

+ + − − + + − =

0 1 2 2 )

(n = n2− n+ +

A

  

  

< +

+ −

<2 2 1 1 0

3 2

n n

n n

= + −

=2 2 1

)

(n n2 n

A centered square number.

SECTION B: Evaluation of centered octagonal number

Let A: NN be defined by A

( )

n =m where

m

is the smallest natural number such

that 2PPn divides m+

(

2n3−4n2 +6n−1

)

. If 2PPndivides

(

2n3−4n2+6n−1

)

,

(3)

85

negative remainder when

(

2n3−4n2 +6n−1

)

is divided by 2PPn. Hence Ais defined for all

n

. By division algorithm such remainder is given by

(

2n3−4n2+6n−1

)

−2qPPn where q is the quotient when

(

2n3−4n2 +6n−1

)

is divided by 2PPn and is given by the greatest integer function of

(

)

n PP

n n n

2

1 6 4

2 3− 2 + −

,

That is

   

  

+

=

n PP

n n n q

2

1 6 4

2 3 2

.

Hence ,

(

) (

)

   

   

+ ×

   

   

+

− + − −

− + − −

+

= 3

3 2 3 2

3

3 2 4 6 1

1 6 4 2 )

( n n

n n

n n n n

n n n

n n A

3 3

2 3

3 3 2

3

3 4 5 1

1 6 4 2 )

( n n

n n

n n n

n n

n n n

n n n n n

A × +

   

   

+

− + − +

    

  

+ + + + − + − + =

3 3

2 3 2

3 4 5 1

1 1 5 4 )

( n n

n n

n n n n

n n n

A × +

   

   

+ − + − + + + − + − =

3 2

3

1 5 4 )

(n n n n n n

A =− + − + + +

  

  

< +

− + −

< 4 5 1 1

0

3 2 3

n n

n n n

= + −

=4 4 1

)

(n n2 n

A centered octagonal number.

SECTION C : Evaluation of centered dodecagonal number

Let A: NN be defined by A

( )

n =m where mis the least natural number such

that 2PPndivides m+

(

3n3−6n2 +9n−1

)

. If 2PPndivides

(

3n3−6n2+9n−1

)

,

then A(n)=6n2−6n+1, otherwise A(n)=

(

6n2−6n+1

)

r where r is the least non

negative remainder when

(

3n3−6n2+9n−1

)

is divided by 2PPn. Hence Ais defined

for all n. By division algorithm such residue is given by

(

3n3−6n2+9n−1

)

−2qPPn

where q is the quotient when

(

3n3−6n2+9n−1

)

is divided by 2PPn and is given by

the greatest integer function of

(

)

n

PP n n n

2

1 9 6

3 3 − 2 + −

,

That is

   

  

+

=

n PP

n n n q

2

1 9 6

3 3 2

.

(4)

86

(

) (

)

        + ×         + − + − − − + − − + = 3 3 2 3 2 3

3 3 6 9 1

1 9 6 3 )

( n n

n n n n n n n n n n n A

( )

3

3 2 3 3 3 2 3

3 3 6 9 1 2 6 7 1 )

( n n

n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n

A × +

        + − + − +         + + + + − + − + = 3 3 2 3 2

3 6 8 1 2 6 7 1 2

)

( n n

n n n n n n n n n

A × +

        + − + − + + + − + − = 3 2 3 2 2 1 8 6 2 )

(n n n n n n

A =− + − + + +

      < + − + −

< 6 7 1 1

0 3 2 3 n n n n n ∵ = + −

=6 6 1

)

(n n2 n

A centered dodecagonal number.

Section D: Evaluation of tetradecagonal number

Let A: NN be defined by A

( )

n =m where mis the smallest natural number such

that 2PPndivides m+

(

2n3−7n2 +9n−1

)

. If 2PPndivides

(

2n3−7n2 +9n−1

)

,

then A(n)=7n2−7n+1, otherwise A(n)=

(

7n2−7n+1

)

r where r is the least non

negative remainder when

(

2n3−7n2 +9n−1

)

is divided by 2PPn. Hence Ais defined for all

n

. By division algorithm such remainder is given by

(

2n3−7n2+9n−1

)

−2qPPn where q is the quotient when

(

2n3−7n2 +9n−1

)

is divided by 2PPn and is given by the greatest integer function of

(

)

n PP n n n 2 1 9 7

2 3− 2+ −

, That is         + = n PP n n n q 2 1 9 7

2 3 2

. Hence ,

(

) (

)

        + ×         + − + − − − + − − + = 3 3 2 3 2 3

3 2 7 9 1

1 9 7 2 )

( n n

n n n n n n n n n n n A

(

)

3

3 2 3 3 3 2 3

3 7 8 1

1 9 7 2 )

( n n

n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n

A × +

        + − + − +         + + + + − + − + =

(

)

3

3 2 3 2

3 7 8 1 1 7 8 1 )

( n n

n n n n n n n n n

A × +

(5)

87 3

2 3

1 8 7 )

(n n n n n n

A =− + − + + +

(

)

  

  

< +

− + −

< 7 8 1 1

0

3 2 3

n n

n n n

= + −

=7 7 1

)

(n n2 n

A centered tetradecagonal number.

SECTION E: Evaluation of centered hexadecagonal number

Let A: NN be defined by A

( )

n =m where mis the lowest natural number such

that 2PPndivides m+

(

3n3−8n2 +11n−1

)

. If 2PPndivides

(

3n3 −8n2 +11n−1

)

,

then A(n)=8n2−8n+1, otherwise A(n)=

(

8n2−8n+1

)

r where r is the least non

negative remainder when

(

3n3−8n2+11n−1

)

is divided by 2PPn. Hence Ais defined for all

n

. By division algorithm such remainder is given by

(

3n3−8n2 +11n−1

)

−2qPPn where q is the quotient when

(

3n3−8n2+11n−1

)

is divided by 2PPn and is given by the greatest integer function of

(

)

n PP

n n

n 2

1 11 8

3 3− 2 + −

,

That is

   

  

+

=

n PP

n n n q

2

1 11 8

3 3 2

.

Hence ,

(

) (

)

   

   

+ ×

   

   

+

− + − −

− + − −

+

= 3

3 2 3 2

3

3 3 8 11 1

1 11 8

3 )

( n n

n n

n n n n

n n n

n n A

( )

3

3 2 3

3 3 2

3

3 2 8 9 1

1 11 8

3 )

( n n

n n

n n n

n n

n n n

n n n n n

A × +

   

   

+ − + − +

    

  

+ + +

+ − + − + =

3 3

2 3 2

3 8 9 1

2 1 10 8

2 )

( n n

n n

n n n n

n n n

A × +

   

   

+ − + − + + + − + − =

3 2

3

2 2 1 10 8

2 )

(n n n n n n

A =− + − + + +

  

  

< +

− + −

< 8 9 1 1

0

3 2 3

n n

n n n

= + −

=8 8 1

)

(n n2 n

A centered hexadecagonal number.

3. Conclusion

In this communication, we find the centered polygonal numbers through the divisibility algorithm. In this manner, one can find the some special numbers through the divisibility algorithm.

REFERENCES

(6)

88 XL (2006) 122-128.

2. M.A.Gopalan and V.Pandichelvi, Two remarkable functions on divisibility, Acta Ciencia Indica, XXXIV M (3) (2008) 1161.

3. van Nivan, Herbert , S.Zuckermann and L.Montgomery, An Introduction to Theory of Numbers, John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York 2004.

4. A.Choudhary, The general solution of a cubic Diophantine equation, Ganita, 50(1) (1999) 1-4.

References

Related documents

Mitra ed., Sample Preparation Techniques in Analytical Chemistry, Wiley-Interscience, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ

Published 2017 by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc..

Table 2 suggests that while new democracies with lower levels of ethnic fractionalization on average have a significantly higher rate of economic growth during the first five

Offerings to nature spirits were made in natural places, for example, people sacrificed to the anthill or to certain trees for the forest spirits, or to the watery places for

Hal inilah yang melatarbelakangi dalam penelitian ini, sehingga pada penelitian ini digunakan metode kopresipitasi untuk pembuatan Barium M-Heksaferit yang disintesis dengan

An experiment was undertaken to identify heterotic rice hybrids for aerobic condition based on physiological and root characters associated with water stress

;.ª V` eb auez est`dkre que bk fldpetenf`k pkrk eb enau`f`kd`entl ;.ª V` eb auez est`dkre que bk fldpetenf`k pkrk eb enau`f`kd`entl flrresplnce kb prlp`l auzjkcl ce `nstruff`ön y

While more details can be found in the Security Overview document, here is an overview: • Marratech uses 256 bit AES encryption on all media (voice, video, whiteboard, chat,