• No results found

Tracker Resolution/Update

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Tracker Resolution/Update"

Copied!
29
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Tracker

Resolution/Update

Melissa Uchida

Imperial College London

Analysis Parallel 30/3/16

(2)

CM44 30/3/16 2

Summary

Hardware Summary

Reconstruction Data

Software and Improvements

Efficiency

Resolution For Step IV

(3)

CM44 30/3/16 3

Hardware Summary

The hardware has been running well since October 2015,

One waveguide was swapped on 24th Feb, this was implemented in mapping and reconstruction within 36 hours.

Several re-calibrations have been performed (as

necessary) and calibration data is taken once per shift.

Helium has been in both trackers since February and is operating well. Epics monitoring is underway.

The hall probes have operated well throughout and produced useful data. They're currently unplugged

awaiting helium leak proofing ~2 weeks (before field on data/training).

(4)

CM44 30/3/16 4

Tracker Reconstruction and Data Validation

Data is analysed for validity within ~24 hours turnaround.

All reconstruction level plots and efficiency are available online through

http://www.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/~mgeorge/Files/2016M ICEData/

There are two scripts available through MAUS for

validation and efficiency work and the full set and

structure will be implemented in a few weeks.

(5)

CM44 30/3/16 5

Digits, MAUS v2, Run7769 US

(6)

CM44 30/3/16 6

Digits, MAUS v2, Run7769 US

Data

Noise from calibration

(7)

CM44 30/3/16 7

Data

Noise

(8)

CM44 30/3/16 8

Digits, MAUS v2, Run7769 DS

(9)

CM44 30/3/16 9

Digits, MAUS v2, Run7769 DS

Data

Noise from calibration

LED calibration

(10)

CM44 30/3/16 10

Clusters, 7850

Ratio = 10 as Reqd

-- singlet -- doublet

(11)

CM44 30/3/16 11

Kuno Plots MAUS 2.1

Entries 320+ Central fibre offset by 1 – known bug

(12)

CM44 30/3/16 12

Spacepoints, 7850

(13)

CM44 30/3/16 13

Spacepoints, 7850

(14)

CM44 30/3/16 14

Beam Profiles US

7864

(15)

CM44 30/3/16 15

Beam Profiles DS

7864

(16)

CM44 30/3/16 16

Tracks

(17)

CM44 30/3/16 17

Track Finding Efficiency (Straights)

Upstream x residuals, Downstream y residuals.

Comparison with projected hit position from joining a hit in TOF1 and TOF2

Upstream x-y residuals

(18)

CM44 30/3/16 18

Track Finding Efficiency

If you have 5 spacepoints in tracker what is the efficiency of finding a 3-5 sp track, req a sp in TOF 1 and 2

US 100%

DS 99.85%

Binomial error

(19)

CM44 30/3/16 19

Track Finding Efficiency

0.84 0.85 0.86 0.87 0.88 0.89 0.9 0.91 0.92 0.93 0.94 0.95 0.96 0.97 0.98 0.99 1 1.01

Pat Rec Track Finding Efficiency

TkUS_5pt TkUS_3-5_pt TkDS_5pt TkDS_3-5pt

Run

Efficiency

If you have 5 spacepoints in tracker what is the efficiency of finding a 3-5 or 5 sp track, req a sp in TOF 1 and 2

Binomial error

(20)

CM44 30/3/16 20

Tracker Efficiency from npe

Unbiased by noise and does not require track finding.

Uses cluster light yield to determine # noisy hits which contaminate SP doublets.

Coincidence (20-50ns) between TOF1&2 trigger SP (within 2ns of particle trigger) and removing multiple events per trigger.

SP grouped into doublets and triplets and light yield of clusters forming the SPs are stored.

These are combined to find efficiency:

E =(T + D −ND)/C

where T= triplets, D = doublets, ND = doublets from noise and C = # TOF coincidence.

T, D and C taken from event selection

(21)

CM44 30/3/16 21

Tracker Efficiency

Prob of doublet sp from noise, P

D

≈ 3.6 × 10

−2

N

D

determined from doublet light yield histogram fitted with triplet light yield and expon decay

(noise)

L

D

(x) = f

1

L

T

(x) + f

2

exp(ax)

x = pe, L

D

(x) = doublet light yield, L

T

(x)= triplet

light yield, f

1

and f

2

fits triplet histo and noise

height respectively

(22)

CM44 30/3/16 22

Efficiency Per Stn

– total – triplets

Requires: TOF1-2: 0-100ns, TOF1 slabs 2,3,4, TOF2 slabs 4,5,6

US eff: a track from the DS tracked to the active area of station 1 in the US.

DS eff a stack from US tracked to the active area of station 1 in the DS

(23)

Melissa Uchida CM44 30/3/16 23

Tracker since CM43

Efficiency measured at spacepoint level for each station.

Correction applied to stop noise hits improving efficiency

Requires:

TOF1-2: 0-100ns

TOF1 slabs 2,3,4

TOF2 slabs 4,5,6

For upstream efficiency a track from the downstream tracked to the active area of station 1 in the upstream.

For downstream efficiency a stack from upstream tracked to the active area of station 1 in the downstream

(24)

CM44 30/3/16 24

Helical Track Finding

Analysis of tracker resolution and efficiency for helical track

reconstruction is underway and will be published in the scifi paper soon.

All plots are for a fairly idealised tracker simulation.

US pz resolution pz

DS pt resolution pt Chris Hunt &

Adam Dobbs

(25)

CM44 30/3/16 25

Helical Track Finding

US pz track efficiency

DS pt Track efficiency Chris Hunt &

Adam Dobbs

(26)

Melissa Uchida CM44 30/3/16

Step IV Fields in Reconstruction

Ongoing studies of the effect of the non-uniform tracker field.

Field Misalignment and Field Uniformity are being treated separately

First results of Field Misalignment are being processed

Simulate a tracker in perfect field

Incrementally rotate the field a perform a full resolution study.

Plot the changes in resolution as a function of field rotation.

Field uniformity study is currently being conducted for the emittance paper

Perform a full resolution study for perfect fields, opera field maps and MAUS field maps.

Try to understand the difference in performance and how it depends on the field uniformity.

Extend with different field maps and analyse the trackfit pulls to try to learn something.

Currently this study is being performed for use in the emittance paper.

Unfortunately it is not quite at the plot-producing phase.

Chris Hunt

(27)

CM44 30/3/16 27

Final Summary

Tracker Hardware is performing well and any

problems have been quickly resolved. Helium is in both trackers, hall probes are operating well

(currently unplugged awaiting helium leak proofing

~2 weeks).

Calibration noise and LED data is taken daily and analysed almost immediately, new calibrations are produced with fast turnaround.

Data taking is going well and data is analysed for validity/problems etc within 24 hours.

Efficiency is calculated in three ways, track finding efficiency, doublets vs triplets and npe and is

~99.5%

(28)

CM44 30/3/16 28

Digits MAUS v2 Helicals 7469

(29)

CM44 30/3/16 29

References

Related documents

Big Data describes the process of extracting actionable intelligence from disparate, and often times non-traditional, data sources.. These data sources may include structured

For cases with non-identical transmit and receive coils (as used in Ref. However, changes in coil load should not lead to the reported effects, if the transmit field

1) Student assessment is administered in each of the core courses within the major: Biological Science i, Biological Science ii, genetics, ecology & evolution, and

Even with the increased availability of hybrid seeds, farmers in the community of Yaxcaba on average plant more than three quarters of their milpa fields to traditional maize

In the case of breeding germplasm, differentiation of full-sib families was performed using RFLP markers within the chloroplast genome (Strefeler et al. 1992 ), as well as

We first perform traversability estimation with rigid terrain assumptions, then correlate the output with experienced vehicle configuration and terrain deformation using a

The commodity price index (see Figure 3) rose very sharply with the trading volume of the commodity derivatives market (see Figures 2A and 2B) and peaked in July 2008 when oil

Table 4 includes estimates of the expression [11] when a 2SLS estimator is used, variables model are transformed in orthogonal deviations and spillovers effects are included: ·