• No results found

Minimal closed sets and maximal closed sets

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Minimal closed sets and maximal closed sets"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

FUMIE NAKAOKA AND NOBUYUKI ODA

Received 20 December 2005; Revised 28 May 2006; Accepted 6 August 2006

Some properties of minimal closed sets and maximal closed sets are obtained, which are dual concepts of maximal open sets and minimal open sets, respectively. Common properties of minimal closed sets and minimal open sets are clarified; similarly, common properties of maximal closed sets and maximal open sets are obtained. Moreover, inter-relations of these four concepts are studied.

Copyright © 2006 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction

Some properties of minimal open sets and maximal open sets are studied in [1,2]. In this paper, we define dual concepts of them, namely, maximal closed set and minimal closed set. These four types of subsets appear in finite spaces, for example. More generally, min-imal open sets and maxmin-imal closed sets appear in locally finite spaces such as the digital line. Minimal closed sets and maximal open sets appear in cofinite topology, for example. We have to study these four concepts to understand the relations among their properties. Some of the results in [1,2] can be dualized using standard techniques of general topol-ogy. But we have to study the “dual results” carefully to understand the duality which we propose in this paper and in [2]. For example, considering the interrelation of these four concepts, we see that some results in [1,2] can be generalized further.

In [1] we called a nonempty open setUofXa minimal open set if any open set which is contained inU isorU. But to consider duality, we have to consider only “proper nonempty open setU of X,” as in the following definitions: a proper nonempty open subsetUofXis said to be a minimal open set if any open set which is contained inU is orU. A proper nonempty open subsetU ofXis said to be a maximal open set if any open set which containsUisXorU. In this paper, we will use the following definitions. A proper nonempty closed subsetFofXis said to be a minimal closed set if any closed set which is contained inFisorF. A proper nonempty closed subsetFofXis said to be a maximal closed set if any closed set which containsFisXorF.

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences Volume 2006, Article ID 18647, Pages1–8

(2)

LetFbe a subset of a topological spaceX. Then the following duality principle holds: (1)Fis a minimal closed set if and only ifX−Fis a maximal open set;

(2)Fis a maximal closed set if and only ifX−Fis a minimal open set.

In Sections2and3, we will show some results on minimal closed sets and maximal closed sets. InSection 4, we will obtain some further results on minimal open sets and maximal open sets.

The symbolΛ\Γmeans difference of index sets, namely,Λ\Γ=ΛΓ, and the cardi-nality of a setΛis denoted by|Λ|in the following arguments. A subsetMof a topological spaceXis called a pre-open set ifM⊂Int(Cl(M)) and a subsetMis called a pre-closed set ifX−Mis a pre-open set.

2. Minimal closed sets

In this section, we prove some results on minimal closed sets.

The following result shows that a fundamental result of [1, Lemma 2.2] also holds for closed sets; it is the dual result of [2, Lemma 2.2].

Lemma 2.1. (1) LetFbe a minimal closed set andNa closed set. ThenF∩N= ∅orF⊂N. (2) LetFandSbe minimal closed sets. ThenF∩S= ∅orF=S.

The proof ofLemma 2.1is omitted, since it is obtained by an argument similar to the proof of [1, Lemma 2.2]. Now, we generalize the dual result of [2, Theorem 2.4].

Theorem 2.2. LetFandFλbe minimal closed sets for any elementλofΛ. (1) IfF⊂λ∈ΛFλ, then there exists an elementλofΛsuch thatF=Fλ. (2) IfF=Fλfor any elementλofΛ, then (λ∈ΛFλ)∩F= ∅.

Proof. (1) SinceF⊂λ∈Λ, we getF=F∩(λ∈Λ)=λ∈Λ(F∩Fλ). IfF=Fλfor any elementλofΛ, thenF∩Fλ= ∅for any elementλofΛbyLemma 2.1(2), hence we have ∅ =λ∈Λ(F∩Fλ)=F. This contradicts our assumption thatFis a minimal closed set. Thus there exists an elementλofΛsuch thatF=Fλ.

(2) If (λ∈ΛFλ)∩F= ∅, then there exists an elementλofΛsuch thatFλ∩F= ∅. By

Lemma 2.1(2), we haveFλ=F, which is a contradiction.

Corollary 2.3. LetFλbe a minimal closed set for any elementλofΛandFλ=Fμfor any elementsλandμofΛwithλ=μ. IfΓis a proper nonempty subset ofΛ, then (λΛ\Γ) (γ∈ΓFγ)= ∅.

The following result is a generalization of the dual result of [2, Theorem 2.5].

Theorem 2.4. LetFλandFγbe minimal closed sets for any elementλofΛandγof Γ. If there exists an elementγofΓsuch thatFλ=Fγfor any elementλofΛ, thenγ∈ΓFγ⊂λ∈ΛFλ. Proof. Suppose that an elementγofΓsatisfiesFλ=Fγfor any elementλofΛ. IfγΓFγ

λ∈Λ, then we getFγ⊂λΛFλ. ByTheorem 2.2(1), there exists an elementλof Λ

such thatFγ=Fλ, which is a contradiction.

(3)

Theorem 2.5. LetFλbe a minimal closed set for any elementλofΛandFλ=Fμ for any elementsλandμofΛwithλ=μ. IfΓis a proper nonempty subset ofΛ, thenγ∈Γ

λ∈ΛFλ.

Proof. Let κ be any element of Λ\Γ. Then Fκ∩(γ∈ΓFγ)=γ∈Γ(Fκ∩Fγ)= ∅ and Fκ∩(λ∈Λ)=λ∈Λ(Fκ∩Fλ)=Fκ. Ifγ∈ΓFγ=λ∈Λ, then we have∅ =Fκ. This contradicts our assumption thatis a minimal closed set. The following theorem is the dual result of [2, Theorem 4.2] and is the key to the proof ofTheorem 2.7, which is closely connected with [2, Theorem 4.7].

Theorem 2.6. Assume that|Λ| ≥2 and letFλbe a minimal closed set for any elementλof ΛandFλ=Fμ for any elementsλandμofΛwithλ=μ. ThenFμ⊂X−λ∈Λ\{μ}Fλand henceλΛ\{μ}Fλ=Xfor any elementμofΛ.

Proof. ByCorollary 2.3, we have the result.

Theorem 2.7 (recognition principle for minimal closed sets). Assume that|Λ| ≥2 and letFλbe a minimal closed set for any elementλofΛandFλ=Fμfor any elementsλandμof Λwithλ=μ. Then for any elementμofΛ,

Fμ=

λ∈Λ

X−

λ∈Λ\{μ}

. (2.1)

Proof. Letμbe an element ofΛ. ByTheorem 2.6, we have

λ∈Λ

X−

λ∈Λ\{μ}

=

λ∈Λ\{μ}

∪Fμ

X−

λ∈Λ\{μ}

=

λ∈Λ\{μ}

X−

λ∈Λ\{μ}

Fμ∩

X−

λ∈Λ\{μ}

=Fμ∩

X−

λ∈Λ\{μ}

=Fμ.

(2.2)

As an application ofTheorem 2.7, we prove the following result which is the dual result of [2, Theorem 4.8].

Theorem 2.8. LetFλbe a minimal closed set for any elementλof a finite setΛandFλ=Fμ for any elementsλandμofΛwithλ=μ. Ifλ∈ΛFλis an open set, thenFλis an open set for any elementλofΛ.

Proof. Let μ be an element of Λ. By Theorem 2.7, we have Fμ=(λ∈Λ)(X−

λ∈Λ\{μ}Fλ)=(λ∈Λ)(λ∈Λ\{μ}(X−Fλ)). By our assumption, it is seen that

(4)

As an immediate consequence ofTheorem 2.6, we have the following result which is the dual of [2, Theorem 4.9].

Theorem 2.9. Assume that|Λ| ≥2 and letFλbe a minimal closed set for any elementλof ΛandFλ=Fμfor any elementsλandμofΛwithλ=μ. Ifλ∈ΛFλ=X, then{Fλ|λ∈Λ} is the set of all minimal closed sets ofX.

LetᏲ= {Fλ|λ∈Λ}be a set of minimal closed sets. We call∪Ᏺ=λ∈ΛFλthe corad-ical ofᏲ. The following result about coradical is obtained by [2, Theorem 4.13].

Theorem 2.10. LetFλbe a minimal closed set for any elementλofΛandFλ=Fμfor any elementsλandμofΛwithλ=μ. Ifλ∈ΛFλis an open set, thenλ∈Λ\{μ}Fλis an open set for any elementμofΛ.

Theorem 2.11. LetFbe a minimal closed set. Then, Int(F)=For Int(F)= ∅.

Proof. If we putU=X−Fin [2, Theorem 3.5], then we have the result. IfSis a proper subset of a minimal closed set, then Int(S)= ∅and henceSis a pre-closed set (cf. [2, Corollary 3.7]).

Theorem 2.12. Let be a minimal closed set for any element λ of a finite set Λ. If Int(λ∈ΛFλ)= ∅, then there exists an elementλofΛsuch that Int(Fλ)=Fλ.

Proof. Since Int(λ∈Λ)= ∅, there exists an elementxof Int(λ∈Λ). Then there ex-ists an open set U such that x∈U⊂λ∈Λ and hence there exists an elementμ of Λsuch thatx∈Fμ. By Theorems2.6and2.7,x∈U∩(X−λ∈Λ\{μ}Fλ)(λ∈Λ) (X−λ∈Λ\{μ}Fλ)=Fμ. SinceU∩(X−λ∈Λ\{μ}Fλ) is an open set, we see thatxis an element of Int() and hence Int()= ∅. Therefore there exists an elementμofΛsuch

that Int()=FμbyTheorem 2.11.

Remark 2.13. IfΛis an infinite set, thenTheorem 2.12does not hold. For example, see [2, Example 5.3].

Theorem 2.14 (the law of interior of coradical). LetFλ be a minimal closed set for any elementλof a finite setΛandFλ=Fμfor any elementsλandμofΛwithλ=μ. LetΓbe a subset ofΛsuch that

IntFλ=Fλ for anyλ∈Γ,

IntFλ= ∅ for anyλ∈Λ\Γ. (2.3) Then Int(λ∈ΛFλ)=λ∈ΓFλ(= ∅ifΓ= ∅).

Proof. By [2, Theorem 5.4], we have the result.

3. Maximal closed sets

The following lemma is the dual ofLemma 2.1.

(5)

Letbe a maximal closed set for any elementλofΛ. LetᏲ= {Fλ|λ∈Λ}. We call

=λ∈ΛFλthe radical ofᏲ.

Corollary 3.2. LetFandFλbe maximal closed sets for any elementλofΛ. IfF=Fλfor any elementλofΛ, then (λ∈ΛFλ)∪F=X.

Proof. ByLemma 3.1(2), we have the result.

Theorem 3.3. LetFandFλbe maximal closed sets for any elementλofΛ. Ifλ∈ΛFλ⊂F, then there exists an elementλofΛsuch thatF=Fλ.

Proof. SinceλΛFλ⊂F, we getF=F∪(λ∈Λ)=λ∈Λ(F∪Fλ). IfF∪Fλ=X for any elementλofΛ, then we haveX=λ∈Λ(F∪Fλ)=F. This contradicts our assumption thatFis a maximal closed set. Then there exists an elementλofΛsuch thatF∪Fλ=X.

ByLemma 3.1(2), we have the result.

Corollary 3.4. LetFλandFγ be maximal closed sets for any elementsλ∈Λandγ∈Γ. IfγΓFγ⊂λ∈ΛFλ, then for any elementλofΛ, there exists an elementγ∈Γsuch that Fλ=Fγ.

Corollary 3.5. LetFα,Fβ, andFγbe maximal closed sets which are different from each other. Then

Fα∩Fβ⊂Fα∩Fγ. (3.1)

Theorem 3.6. LetFλ be a maximal closed set for any elementλofΛandFλ=Fμ for any elementsλandμofΛwithλ=μ. IfΓis a proper nonempty subset ofΛ, thenλΛ\ΓFλ⊂

γ∈ΓFγ⊂λ∈Λ\ΓFλ.

Proof. Letγ be any element ofΓ. Ifλ∈Λ\ΓFλ⊂Fγ, then we getFλ=Fγ for someλ∈ Λ\ΓbyTheorem 3.3. This contradicts our assumption. Therefore we haveλ∈Λ\ΓFλ⊂

γ∈Γ. On the other hand, sinceγ∈ΓFγ=γ∈Λ\\Γ)Fγ⊂

λ∈Λ\Γ, we haveγ∈ΓFγ⊂

λ∈Λ\Γ.

Theorem 3.7. LetFλ be a maximal closed set for any elementλofΛandFλ=Fμ for any elementsλandμofΛwithλ=μ. IfΓis a proper nonempty subset ofΛ, thenλ∈Λ

γ∈ΓFγ.

Proof. Letκbe any element ofΛ\Γ. ThenFκ∪(γ∈Γ)=γ∈Γ(Fκ∪Fγ)=XandFκ∪ (λΛ)=λ∈Λ(Fκ∪Fλ)=Fκ. Ifγ∈ΓFγ=λ∈Λ, then we haveX=Fκ. This

contra-dicts our assumption thatis a maximal closed set.

Theorem 3.8. Assume that|Λ| ≥2 and letFλbe a maximal closed set for any elementλof ΛandFλ=Fμ for any elementsλandμofΛwithλ=μ. ThenX−λ∈Λ\{μ}Fλ⊂Fμand henceλΛ\{μ}Fλ= ∅for any elementμofΛ.

Proof. Letμbe any element ofΛ. ByLemma 3.1(2), we haveX−Fμ⊂Fλfor any element λofΛwithλ=μ. ThenX−Fμ⊂λ∈Λ\{μ}Fλ. Therefore we haveX−λ∈Λ\{μ}Fλ⊂Fμ.

(6)

Theorem 3.9 (decomposition theorem for maximal closed sets). Assume that |Λ| ≥2 and letFλbe a maximal closed set for any elementλofΛandFλ=Fμfor any elementsλand μofΛwithλ=μ. Then for any elementμofΛ,

Fμ=

λ∈Λ

X− λ∈Λ\{μ}

. (3.2)

Proof. Letμbe an element ofΛ. ByTheorem 3.8, we have

λ∈Λ

X− λ∈Λ\{μ}

=

λ∈Λ\{μ}

∩Fμ

X− λ∈Λ\{μ}

=

λ∈Λ\{μ}

X− λ∈Λ\{μ}

Fμ∪

X− λ∈Λ\{μ}

=Fμ∪

X− λ∈Λ\{μ}

=Fμ.

(3.3)

Theorem 3.10. LetFλbe a maximal closed set for any elementλofΛandFλ=Fμfor any elementsλandμofΛwithλ=μ. IfλΛ is an open set, thenFλis an open set for any elementλofΛ.

Proof. By Theorem 3.9, we have =(λ∈ΛFλ)∪(X −λ∈Λ\{μ}Fλ)=(λ∈ΛFλ)∪ (λΛ\{μ}(X−Fλ)). Then λ∈Λ\{μ}(X−Fλ) is an open set. Hence is an open set by

our assumption.

Theorem 3.11. Assume that|Λ| ≥2 and letFλbe a maximal closed set for any elementλof ΛandFλ=Fμfor any elementsλandμofΛwithλ=μ. Ifλ∈ΛFλ= ∅, then{Fλ|λ∈Λ} is the set of all maximal closed sets ofX.

Proof. If there exists another maximal closed set of X which is not equal to for any elementλof Λ, then∅ =λ∈ΛFλ=λ∈∪{ν})\{ν}Fλ. ByTheorem 3.8, we get

λ∈∪{ν})\{ν}Fλ= ∅. This contradicts our assumption.

Theorem 3.12. Assume that|Λ| ≥2 and letFλ be a maximal closed set for any element λofΛandFλ=Fμ for any elementsλ andμofΛwithλ=μ. If Int(λ∈Λ)= ∅, then {Fλ|λ∈Λ}is the set of all maximal closed sets ofX.

Proof. If there exists another maximal closed setFofXwhich is not equal tofor any elementλ of Λ, thenX−F⊂λ∈Λ byTheorem 3.8. It follows that Int(λ∈Λ) Int(X−F)=X−F= ∅. This contradicts our assumption.

The proof of the following lemma is immediate and is omitted.

(7)

Proposition 3.14. LetFλbe a closed set for any elementλofΛandFλ∪Fμ=X for any elementsλandμofΛwithλ=μ. Ifλ∈ΛFλis an open set, thenλ∈Λ\{μ}Fλis an open set for any elementμofΛ.

Proof. Letμbe any element ofΛ. SinceFλ∪Fμ=Xfor any elementλofΛwithλ=μ, we haveFμ∪(λ∈Λ\{μ}Fλ)=λ∈Λ\{μ}(Fμ∪Fλ)=X. SinceFμ∩(λ∈Λ\{μ}Fλ)=λ∈Λ is an open set by our assumption,λΛ\{μ}is an open set byLemma 3.13.

Theorem 3.15. LetFλbe a maximal closed set for any elementλofΛandFλ=Fμfor any elementsλandμofΛwithλ=μ. Ifλ∈ΛFλis an open set, thenλ∈Λ\{μ}Fλis an open set for any elementμofΛ.

Proof. ByLemma 3.1(2), we haveFλ∪Fμ=Xfor any elementsλandμofΛwithλ=μ.

ByProposition 3.14, we haveλΛ\{μ}is an open set.

4. Minimal open sets and maximal open sets

In this section, we record some results on minimal open sets and maximal open sets, which are not proved in [1,2]. The proofs are omitted since they are obtained by dual arguments.

Letᐁ= {Uλ|λ∈Λ}be a set of minimal open sets. We callᐁ=λ∈ΛUλthe corad-ical ofᐁ. By an argument similar toTheorem 2.2, we have the following result.

Theorem 4.1. LetUandUλbe minimal open sets for any elementλofΛ. (1) IfU⊂λ∈ΛUλ, then there exists an elementλofΛsuch thatU=Uλ. (2) IfU=Uλfor any elementλofΛ, then (λ∈Λ)∩U= ∅.

Corollary 4.2. LetUλbe a minimal open set for any elementλofΛandUλ=Uμfor any elementsλandμofΛwithλ=μ. IfΓis a proper nonempty subset ofΛ, then (λΛ\Γ) (γΓ)= ∅.

The following results are shown by the arguments similar to the proofs of Theorems

2.4,2.5, and2.6, respectively.

Theorem 4.3. LetUλandUγbe minimal open sets for any elementsλ∈Λandγ∈Γ. If there exists an elementγofΓsuch thatUλ=Uγ for any elementλofΛ, thenγ∈ΓUγ⊂

λ∈ΛUλ.

Theorem 4.4. LetUλ be a minimal open set for any elementλofΛandUλ=Uμ for any elementsλandμofΛwithλ=μ. IfΓis a proper nonempty subset ofΛ, thenγΓ

λ∈ΛUλ.

Theorem 4.5. Assume that|Λ| ≥2 and letUλbe a minimal open set for any elementλof ΛandUλ=Uμfor any elementsλandμofΛwithλ=μ. ThenUμ⊂X−λ∈Λ\{μ}Uλand henceλΛ\{μ}Uλ=Xfor any elementμofΛ.

We obtain the following result for minimal open sets (cf. Theorems2.7and3.9).

(8)

withλ=μ. Then for any elementμofΛ,

Uμ=

λ∈Λ

X−

λ∈Λ\{μ}

. (4.1)

Theorem 4.7. LetUλbe a minimal open set for any elementλof any setΛandUλ=Uμfor any elementsλandμofΛwithλ=μ. IfλΛUλis a closed set, thenUλis a closed set for any elementλofΛ(cf. Theorems2.8and3.10).

Theorem 4.8. Assume that|Λ| ≥2 and letUλbe a minimal open set for any elementλofΛ andUλ=Uμfor any elementsλandμofΛwithλ=μ. Ifλ∈ΛUλ=X, then{Uλ|λ∈Λ} is the set of all minimal open sets ofX(cf. Theorems2.9and3.11).

Theorem 4.9. Assume that|Λ| ≥2 and letUλ be a minimal open set for any elementλ ofΛandUλ=Uμ for any elementsλ andμof Λwith λ=μ. If Cl(λ∈ΛUλ)=X, then {Uλ|λ∈Λ}is the set of all minimal open sets ofX(cf. Theorem3.12).

Example 4.10 (the digital line). The digital line is the setZof the intergers equipped with the topologyτhaving a family of subsetsS= {{2k−1, 2k, 2k+ 1} |k∈Z}as a subbase. We consider a set of minimal open sets{Uk= {2k+ 1} |k∈Z}. Then Cl(k∈ZUk)= Cl({2k+ 1|k∈Z})=Zand hence{Uk= {2k+ 1} |k∈Z}is the set of all minimal open sets in (Z,τ).

Finally we consider maximal open sets. The following results are the duals of Theorems

2.2(1) and2.4.

Theorem 4.11. LetUandUλbe maximal open sets for any elementλofΛ. IfU⊃λ∈ΛUλ, then there exists an elementλofΛsuch thatU=Uλ.

Theorem 4.12. LetUλ andUγbe maximal open sets for any elementsλofΛandγofΓ. If there exists an elementγofΓsuch thatUλ=Uγ for any elementλofΛ, thenγ∈ΓUγ⊃

λ∈ΛUλ.

References

[1] F. Nakaoka and N. Oda, Some applications of minimal open sets, International Journal of Mathe-matics and Mathematical Sciences 27 (2001), no. 8, 471–476.

[2] , Some properties of maximal open sets, International Journal of Mathematics and Math-ematical Sciences 2003 (2003), no. 21, 1331–1340.

Fumie Nakaoka: Department of Applied Mathematics, Fukuoka University, Nanakuma Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan

E-mail address:[email protected]

Nobuyuki Oda: Department of Applied Mathematics, Fukuoka University, Nanakuma Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan

References

Related documents

досліджено вплив вортманіну і сіалоспецифічних лектинів на транслокацію p85 α регуляторної субодиниці ензиму фосфатидилінозитол-3 ′ -кінази (р1-3 ′ -кінази) між

Our primary hypothesis was that patients with ankle fracture would have lower walking speed, step length, cadence, and trunk movement symmetry and regularity than healthy controls

In summary, this study demonstrates that the response to an exercise training intervention program, in healthy, sedentary young adults is similar regardless of whether the

) 6 (. حيضوتلاب هلوانتنس اذل ،ةساردلا هذھ يف دوصقملا وھ صاخلا ىنعملا اذھو : 1. ) 6 ( عقوم ،ةيرصملا يملاسلإا هقفلا ةعوسوم ،ةرھاقلاب ةيملاسلإا نوؤشلل ىلعلأا سلجملا د

Since the core of strategic planning in any organization is to improve the productivity value, improving competitive image of the organization, improving

A cross-sectional study was conducted to find out the knowledge and practice of mother having under five children regarding the childhood diarrhea in Madhuban

Transmitter section is contain the android mobile and Receiver section is the actual controlling electronic system for home automation which is designed using the Arduino

F-test was used to compare the cytotoxic activities of the different concentrations of saraisa bark extract against brine shrimp nauplii and the negative control