• No results found

Stable rings generated by their units

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Stable rings generated by their units"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

PII. S0161171201005798 http://ijmms.hindawi.com © Hindawi Publishing Corp.

STABLE RINGS GENERATED BY THEIR UNITS

HUANYIN CHEN

(Received 12 September 2000)

Abstract.We introduce the class of rings satisfying(m,1)-stable range and investigate equivalent characterizations of such rings. These give generalizations of the corresponding results by Badawi (1994), Ehrlich (1976), and Fisher and Snider (1976).

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 19B10, 16E50.

LetRbe an associative ring with identity. A ringRis said to have stable range one provided thataR+bR=Rimplies thata+by∈U (R)fory∈R. It is well known that MRcancels from direct sums if EndRMhas stable range one. For further properties of stable range one condition, we refer the reader to [1,2,5,7,9,10,13,14].

Many authors have studied rings generated by their units (see [3,4,7,8,10,12]). It was shown that every unit-regular ring in which 2 is invertible is generated by its unit (see [7, Theorem 5]) and every stronglyπ-regular ring in which 2 is invertible is generated by its units (see [8, Theorem 3]). So far one always investigate such rings under stable range one condition.

In this paper, we generalize stable range one condition and introduce rings satis-fying(m,1)-stable range so as to investigate rings generated by their units. Also we give generalizations of the corresponding results in [3,7,8].

Throughout, rings are associative with identity and modules are right modules. GLn(R)denotes the general linear group ofR,U (R)denotes the set of units ofR, and thatUm(R)= {x∈R| ∃u1, . . . , um∈U (R)such thatx=u1+···+um}. LetBij(x)=

I2+xeij (ij, 1≤i, j≤2),[α, β]=αe11+βe22, whereeij (1≤i, j≤2)are matrix units (1 in thei, jposition and 0 elsewhere).

Definition1. The ringRis said to satisfy(m,1)-stable range provided thataR+

bR=Rimplies thata+by∈U (R)fory∈Um(R).

Proposition2. The following are equivalent: (1)The ringRsatisfies(m,1)-stable range.

(2)Wheneverax+b=1, there existsy∈Um(R)such thata+by∈U (R).

Proof. (1)(2). The proof is obvious.

(2)(1). GivenaR+bR=R, thenax+by=1 for somex, y∈R. So we can find z∈Um(R)such thataxz+b=u∈U (R), and thenaxzu−1+bu−1=1. Hence we havew∈Um(R)such thata+bu−1w∈U (R). Clearly,u−1w∈Um(R), as desired.

Proposition3. The following are equivalent: (1)The ringRsatisfies(m,1)-stable range.

(2)

Proof. (1)(2). Given ¯ax¯+¯b=1 in¯ R/J(R), thenax+(b+r )=1 for somer

J(R). SinceRsatisfies(m,1)-stable range, we havey∈Um(R)such thata+(b+r )y∈

U (R). Therefore ¯a+b¯y¯U (R/J(R))with ¯yUm(R/J(R)), henceR/J(R)satisfies (m,1)-stable range byProposition 2.

(2)(1). Givenax+b=1 inR, then ¯ax¯+b¯=¯1 inR/J(R). So there is ¯y∈Um(R/J(R)) such that ¯a+b¯y¯=u¯U (R/J(R)). Assume that y=w1+w2+ ··· +wm with all wi∈U (R/J(R)). Since units lift moduloJ(R), we may assume that allwi∈U (R)and

u∈U (R), and thata+b(w1+w2+ ··· +wm)=u+r for somer∈J(R). Obviously,

u+r∈U (R)andw1+w2+···+wm∈Um(R). HenceRsatisfies(m,1)-stable range, as asserted.

Theorem4. LetRbe an associative ring with identity,Ka set of some elements of R. Then the following are equivalent:

(1)Wheneverax+b=1, there existsy∈Ksuch thata+by∈U (R).

(2)Wheneverax+b=1, there existsz∈Ksuch thatx+zb∈U (R).

Proof. (1)(2). Since ax+b = 1, we see that a1xb−1 = x11axa GL2(R). Clearly,xa+(1−xa)=1. So there existsz∈Ksuch thatx+(1−xa)z=u∈U (R). Hence a−b

1 x −11 0

z1

=u∗

∗ ∗∈GL2(R). Thus we know that a1−xb −1

=u∗ ∗ ∗−1 0z1

. Therefore a−b

1 x

= 1 0 z1

u

∗ ∗−1. Since there is w U (R) such that u∗ ∗∗ = 1 0

1 u 0

0w 1

0 1

, we have v =w−1 U (R)such that u∗

∗ ∗−1 = 10 1 u−10

0 v 1 0

1

. Hence a−b

1 x

= 1 0 z1

∗ ∗ ∗v

, v U (R). So 1 0 −z1

ab 1 x

= ∗ ∗∗v

. Thus, we see that x+zb=v∈U (R), as required.

(2)(1). Applying (1)(2) to the opposite ringRop, we complete the proof.

Theorem 4is a general result for symmetry of stable range conditions. As appli-cations, we see that stable range one conditions, unit 1-stable range conditions and rings having many unit-regular elements are symmetric. The following result shows that(m,1)-stable range condition is right-left symmetric.

Corollary5. The following are equivalent: (1)The ringRsatisfies(m,1)-stable range.

(2)Wheneverax+b=1, there exists somez∈Um(R)such thatx+zb∈U (R). (3)WheneverRa+Rb=R, there exists somez∈Um(R)such thata+zb∈U (R).

Proof. (1)(2). SetK=Um(R). Then the equivalence follows byTheorem 4. (3)(2). The proof is trivial.

(2)(3). Given Ra+Rb = R, then xa+yb= 1 for some x, y R. So we have s Um(R) such that sxa+b = u ∈U (R), hence u−1sxa+u−1b =1. Therefore

a+vu−1bU (R)for somevU

m(R), as required.

Proposition6. The following are equivalent: (1)The ringRsatisfies(m,1)-stable range.

(2) For any A GL2(R), there exists some w Um(R) such that A =

[∗,∗]B21(w)B12(∗)B21(∗).

(3) For any A GL2(R), there exists some w Um(R) such that A =

(3)

Proof. (1)(2). LetAGL2(R), and letA1=(bij). Since b11R+b12R=R, we can find some y ∈Um(R)such that b11+b12y =u∈U (R). We easily check that

A−1=B

21(b21+b22u−1)[u, b22−(b21+b22y)u−1b12]B12(u−1b12)B21(−y). ThusA=

[∗,∗]B21(w)B12(∗)B21(∗)for somew∈Um(R). (2)(1). Given ax+b=1 in R, then we have a b

1x

GL2(R). Thus we have a

w∈Um(R)such that a b

1x 1

=[∗,∗]B21(w)B12(∗)B21(∗).Therefore we see that a b

1x

=[∗,∗]B21(∗)B12(∗)B21(−y)for somey∈Um(R).Consequently, a+by∈

U (R)withy∈Um(R), as desired.

(1)(3). Applying (1)(2) to the opposite ringRop, we complete the proof by the symmetry of(m,1)-stable range conditions.

LetRbe generated bymunits. IfR has stable range one, then it satisfies(m,1) -stable range. Conversely, we easily check that every ring satisfying(m,1)-stable range is generated by m+1 units. Now we show that (m,1)-stable range condition is inherited by matrix rings.

Lemma7. The following are equivalent: (1)The ringRsatisfies(m,1)-stable range.

(2)Givenax+b =1in R, then there existsy ∈R such that a+by∈U (R)and

1−xy∈Um(R).

(3) Givenax+b =1 inR, then there exists z∈R such that x+zb∈U (R) and

1−za∈Um(R).

Proof. (1)(2). Given ax+b = 1 in R, then a b1x GL2(R). In view of

Proposition 6, we have aw∈Um(R)such that a b

1x

=[∗,∗]B21(w)B12(∗)B21(∗). So we can find some−y∈Rsuch thata b

1x)=[∗,∗]B21(w)B12(∗)B21(−y). There-forea+by∈U (R)and 1−xy= −(−1+xy)∈Um(R), as required.

(2)(1). Givenax+b=1 inR, then there exists somey∈Rsuch thata+by=u∈

U (R) and 1 xy = v Um(R). So we know that a b1x 1 0

y1

= u b −v x

=

[∗,∗]B21(w)B12(∗)for somew∈Um(R). Thus a b

1x

=[∗,∗]B21(w)B12(∗)B21(−y). So we can findz∈Um(R)such that

1 0 z1

a b 1x

=[∗,∗]B12(∗)B21(∗). Consequently, we show thatx+zb∈U (R)for somez∈Um(R). ThereforeRsatisfies(m,1)-stable range byCorollary 5.

(1)(3). Applying (1)(2) to the opposite ringRop, we complete the proof.

In [6], the author shows that every matrix ring over a ring satisfying unit 1-stable range also satisfies unit 1-stable range. Now we extend [6, Theorem 2.2] to(m,1) -stable range conditions by a similar route.

Theorem8. IfRsatisfies(m,1)-stable range, then so doesMn(R)for anyn≥1.

Proof. GivenBC+D=IninMn(R), thenA=BI D nC

GL2n(R). SetA=(Aij) (1

i, j≤2)with allAij=(aijst)∈Mn(R) (1≤s, t≤n). Then there existx1, . . . , xn, y1, . . . ,

yn∈R such that a1111x1+ ··· +a111nxn+a1211y1+ ··· +a121nyn =1, . . . , a11n1x1+ ··· +

a11

nnxn+a12n1y1+ ··· +a12nnyn=0,a2111x1+ ··· +a211nxn+a2211y1+ ··· +a221nyn=0, . . . ,

a21n1x1+ ··· +a21nnxn+a22n1y1+ ··· +a22nnyn=0.In view ofLemma 7, there isz1∈R such thata11

(4)

[∗,∗]A[∗,∗]B21(∗)=                     

u1 a1112 ··· a111n a1211 ··· a121n

0 b1122 ··· b2n11 b1221 ··· b122n

..

. ... . .. ... ... . .. ...

0 b11

n2 ··· bnn11 bn112 ··· bnn12

a2111v1 a2112 ··· a211n a2211 ··· a221n

..

. ... . .. ... ... . .. ...

a21n1v1 a21n2 ··· a21nn a22n1 ··· a22nn                      . (1)

Likewise, we haveu2, u3, . . . , un∈U (R)andv2, v3, . . . , vn∈Um(R)such that

[∗,∗]A[∗,∗]B21(∗)=                        

u1 ··· a1211 ··· a121n

0 u2 ··· b2112 ··· b2n12

0 0 u3 ··· c3112 ··· c123n

..

. ... ... . .. ... ... . .. ...

0 0 0 ··· un d12n1 ··· d12nn

a2111v1 a2112v2 a2113v3 ··· a211nvn a2211 ··· a221n

..

. ... ... . .. ... ... . .. ...

a21

n1v1 a21n2v2 a21n3v3 ··· a21nnvn a22n1 ··· a22nn                         . (2)

Similar to the consideration in [6, Theorem 2.2] , we can find someE∈GLn(R)such that[∗,∗]A[∗,∗]B21(∗)=[∗,∗]B21(−E−1diag(v1, . . . , vn))B12(∗). Consequently,A=

[∗,∗]B21(W )B12(∗)B21(∗)withW∈Um(Mn(R)). So there isW∈Um(Mn(R))such that

B21

W B D

−In C

=[∗,∗]B12(∗)B21(∗), soC+WD∈GLn(R). (3)

It follows fromCorollary 5thatMn(R)satisfies(m,1)-stable range.

Corollary9. LetRsatisfy(m,1)-stable range, then everyn×nmatrix overRis

the sum ofm+1invertible matrices.

Proof. LetAMn(R). SinceRsatisfies(m,1)-stable range, so doesMn(R)from

Theorem 8. AsAMn(R)+InMn(R)=Mn(R), we can find someU∈Um(Mn(R))such thatA+In×U=V∈GLn(R). ThusA=(−U )+V, as desired.

Recall that a ringRis said to be an exchange ring if for every rightR-moduleAand any two decompositionsA=M⊕N=i∈IAi, whereMR RR and the index setI is finite, then there exist submodulesAi⊆Aisuch thatA=M⊕(

i∈IAi). A ringR is said to be stronglyπ-regular provided that for anyx∈R, there exists a positive integernsuch thatxn=xn+1yfor someyR.

(5)

of M. Henriksen [11], we claim that the ringRhas stable range one if and only if the ring M2(R)satisfies(3,1)-stable range. For exchange rings, we now derive the following.

Lemma10.LetRbe an exchange ring with1/2R. Then the following are equivalent: (1)The exchange ringRhas stable range one.

(2)The exchange ringRsatisfies(7,1)-stable range.

Proof. (2)(1). The proof is clear.

(1)(2). Givenax+b=1 inR, thena+by∈U (R)fory∈R. SinceRis an exchange ring, there exists an idempotente∈Rsuch thate=ysand 1−e=(1−y)t. Obviously, ey and(1−e)(1−y)are both regular. Thusey=f u, (1−e)(1−y)=gv for some f =f2, g=g2R andu, vU (R). Hencey=ey(1e)(1y)+1e=f u

gv+1−e. As 2∈U (R), we see thatf=21+21(2f1),g=21+21(2g1)and

e=21+21(2e1). Clearly, 21(2f1),21(2g1),21(2e1)U (R). Therefore

y∈U7(R), as required.

Theorem11. LetRbe a stronglyπ-regular ring. If2is a nonnilpotent ofR, then

there exists some nonzero idempotente∈R such thatMn(eRe)satisfies (7,1)-stable

range.

Proof. SinceRis a stronglyπ-regular ring, there existsn1 such that 2n=eu for somee=e2, uU (R). Since 2 is a nonnilpotent ofR, we see thate0. Assume thatuv=1 forv∈R. We easily check that(eue)(eve)=2neve=euve=e. Likewise, we have(eve)(eue)=e. Thus 2e∈U (eRe). On the other hand, we know thateReis a stronglyπ-regular ring. By virtue of [1, Theorem 4],Rhas stable range one. Thus we complete the proof byTheorem 8andLemma 10.

Proposition12. The following are equivalent: (1)The ringRsatisfies(m,1)-stable range.

(2)WheneveraR+bR=dR, there existy∈Um(R),u∈U (R)such thata+by=du. (3)WheneverRa+Rb=dR, there existz∈Um(R),u∈U (R)such thata+zb=ud.

Proof. (1)(2). GivenaR+bR=dR, then(a, b)M2(R)=(d,0)M2(R). Assume that (d,0)A=(a, b)and (a, b)B=(d,0). FromAB+(I2−AB)=I2, we have Y ∈M2(R) such thatA+(I2−AB)Y=W∈GL2(R). Thus(a, b)=(d,0)A=(d,0)(A+(I2−AB))=

(d,0)W. Assume thatW=(wij). Thenw11R+w12R=R, whencew11+w12y=u∈

U (R)fory∈Um(R). Thereforea+by=du, as desired. (2)(1). The proof is trivial.

(1)(3). Applying (1)(2) to the opposite ringRop, we complete the proof by the symmetry of(m,1)-stable range property.

Corollary13. LetRbe a ring which is quasi-injective as a rightR-module. Then

the following are equivalent:

(1)The ringRsatisfies(m,1)-stable range.

(2)Wheneverr·ann(a)∩r·ann(b)=r·ann(d), there existsz∈Um(R)such that

ann(a)∩r·ann(b)=r·ann(a+zb).

(3)Wheneverl·ann(a)∩l·ann(b)=l·ann(d), there existsy∈Um(R)such that

ann(a)∩l·ann(b)=l·ann(a+by).

(6)

thata+zb=dufor someu∈U (R). Thereforeann(a)∩r·ann(b)=r·ann(d)=

ann(a+zb), as desired.

(2)(1). Assume thatRa+Rb=R. Thenann(a)∩r·ann(b)=r·ann(1). Thus, we claim that ann(a)∩r·ann(b)=r·ann(a+zb)for a z∈Um(R). Therefore

ann(1)=r·ann(a+zb). By [5, Proposition 3.4], we show thatR=R(a+zb), and then a+zb=u is left invertible inR. Assume thatvu=1 for some v∈R. From Rv+R(1−uv)=R, we also havew ∈Um(R)such thatv+w(1−uv)=tis left invertible inR. Clearly, we havetu=(v+w(1−uv))u=1. Hencetis a unit ofR. Thereforea+zb=uis a unit ofR, as desired.

(1)(2). By the symmetry of(m,1)-stable range condition, we complete the proof.

Acknowledgements. This work was supported by grant no. 19801012 of the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and the Ministry of Education of China. The author would like to thank the referee for many helpful suggestions.

References

[1] P. Ara,Stronglyπ-regular rings have stable range one, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.124(1996), no. 11, 3293–3298.MR 97a:16024. Zbl 865.16007.

[2] P. Ara, K. R. Goodearl, K. C. O’Meara, and E. Pardo,Separative cancellation for projective modules over exchange rings, Israel J. Math.105(1998), 105–137.MR 99g:16006. Zbl 908.16002.

[3] A. Badawi,On semicommutativeπ-regular rings, Comm. Algebra22(1994), no. 1, 151– 157.MR 94j:16015. Zbl 803.16008.

[4] V. P. Camillo and H.-P. Yu,Exchange rings, units and idempotents, Comm. Algebra22

(1994), no. 12, 4737–4749.MR 95d:16013. Zbl 811.16002.

[5] M. J. Canfell,Completion of diagrams by automorphisms and Bass’ first stable range con-dition, J. Algebra176(1995), no. 2, 480–503.MR 97a:16004. Zbl 839.16007.

[6] H. Chen,Units, idempotents, and stable range conditions, Comm. Algebra29(2001), no. 2, 703–717.CMP 1 841 993.

[7] G. Ehrlich,Units and one-sided units in regular rings, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.216(1976), 81–90.MR 52#8183. Zbl 298.16012.

[8] J. W. Fisher and R. L. Snider,Rings generated by their units, J. Algebra42(1976), no. 2, 363–368.MR 54#7531. Zbl 335.16014.

[9] K. R. Goodearl,von Neumann Regular Rings, Monographs and Studies in Mathematics, vol. 4, Pitman, Massachusetts, 1979.MR 80e:16011. Zbl 411.16007.

[10] D. Handelman,Perspectivity and cancellation in regular rings, J. Algebra48(1977), no. 1, 1–16.MR 56#5642. Zbl 363.16009.

[11] M. Henriksen,Two classes of rings generated by their units, J. Algebra31(1974), 182–193.

MR 50#2238. Zbl 285.16009.

[12] R. Raphael, Rings which are generated by their units, J. Algebra 28(1974), 199–205.

MR 49#7300. Zbl 271.16013.

[13] L. N. Vaserstein,Bass’s first stable range condition, J. Pure Appl. Algebra34(1984), no. 2-3, 319–330.MR 86c:18009. Zbl 547.16017.

[14] H.-P. Yu,Stable range one for exchange rings, J. Pure Appl. Algebra98(1995), no. 1, 105–109.MR 96g:16006. Zbl 837.16009.

Huanyin Chen: Department of Mathematics, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410006, China

References

Related documents

To solve this problem, we proposed URIs containing cryptographic hash values encoded using base64 algorithm.. We prove that how these trusty URIs can be useful for the

Importantly, in vitro cell viability assays and in vivo animal tests revealed that the nanosolid dispersion system dramatically enhanced the bioavailability and showed

In coastal or marine environments, most fish individuals harbour a very diverse parasite fauna (Overstreet et al. 2003), and infections with some species might result in a modulation

Radiofrequency ablation of isolated local recurrence of renal cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy. Zhou W, Herwald SE, Uppot RN, Arellano RS (2018) Image-guided thermal

The combination of patient questionnaires and record review provided us with high-quality data on ethnic origin, language pro fi ciency, health literacy and educa- tion, which are

Based on these integral representation formulas, the boundary behavior of some singular integral operators, and the Clifford analytic approach, we prove that the fourth-order

They include elements like P[Sa1](89D) carrying mod- ifications preventing the expression of the P element fourth exon. T h e P mutagenic activity is the result of trans-

assessing sequential therapy in 160 children demonstrated that eradication rate depended on susceptibility of H. pylori strains to clarithromycin and metronidazole and was