• No results found

Corn Row Spacing Considerations

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Corn Row Spacing Considerations"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Integrated Crop Management News Extension and Experiment Station Publications

3-12-2018

Corn Row Spacing Considerations

Emily Wright Iowa State University Mark A. Licht

Iowa State University, [email protected]

Follow this and additional works at:https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cropnews

Part of theAgricultural Science Commons, and theAgriculture Commons

The Iowa State University Digital Repository provides access to Integrated Crop Management News for historical purposes only. Users are hereby notified that the content may be

inaccurate, out of date, incomplete and/or may not meet the needs and requirements of the user. Users should make their own assessment of the information and whether it is suitable for their intended purpose. For current information on integrated crop management from Iowa State University Extension and Outreach, please visithttps://crops.extension.iastate.edu/. Recommended Citation

Wright, Emily and Licht, Mark A., "Corn Row Spacing Considerations" (2018).Integrated Crop Management News. 2460.

(2)

Corn Row Spacing Considerations

Abstract

Corn row spacing and plant population have been the focus of many studies throughout the years in an effort to identify ways to increase yields and minimize production costs. Many studies have shown that there was a yield increase going from a 40-inch row spacing to a 30-inch row spacing. Studies had varying results when it comes to less than a 30-inch row spacing. In some cases, row spacing has had no effect on yield whereas others have seen anywhere from a 2-7% increase in yield by narrowing row spacing from the more common 30-inch. Disciplines

Agricultural Science | Agriculture

(3)

2/21/2019 Corn Row Spacing Considerations | Integrated Crop Management

https://crops.extension.iastate.edu/cropnews/2018/03/corn-row-spacing-considerations 1/4

Integrated Crop Management

Corn Row Spacing Considerations

March 12, 2018

Corn row spacing and plant population have been the focus of many studies throughout the years in an effort to identify ways to increase yields and minimize production costs. Many studies have shown that there was a yield increase going from a 40-inch row spacing to a 30-inch row spacing. Studies had varying results when it comes to less than a 30-inch row spacing. In some cases, row spacing has had no effect on yield whereas others have seen anywhere from a 2-7% increase in yield by narrowing row spacing from the more common 30-inch.

Since 2009, there have been 10 site-years of research trials done in western Iowa looking at the interaction of row spacing and plant population. The objective of this article is to compare various trials to better understand row spacing effects on yield across a broad range of environments. The results from this data suggest that there is a slight yield advantage to 20-inch row spacing compared to 30-inch. In 50% of the site-years, corn planted at a 20-inch row spacing yielded 4.8-15.9 bu/ac more than the 30-inch row spacing. The remaining 50% had no yield difference between 20- and 30-inch row spacing. This serves as a reminder that growing season and hybrid can significantly influence row spacing effect on yield.

(4)

Figure 1. Corn yield response for 20-inch and 30-inch row spacing for ten site-years in northwest Iowa from 2009 through 2016. The solid line is the 1:1 yield line.

Corn row spacing, plant population interactions were evaluated across the 10 site-years and there was no significant interaction. In other words, the recommended plant

populations for Iowa are around 34,000-37,000 plants per acre, and these plant

populations would not need to be changed if row spacing was reduced from 30 inches to 20 inches.

Rapid canopy closure is one attribute of narrow row spacing that has multiple benefits including inhibiting weed emergence and reducing soil moisture evaporation while increasing light interception. However, there are disadvantages that largely center on equipment setup and capital expenses. In 20-inch row spacing, tire spacing is often

adjusted for tractors and sprayer operations to help control traffic between the rows, both in and out of the growing season. In some instances, especially with high clearance

sprayers, a narrower tire is desired to minimize traffic on the corn row (i.e. increase the margin for error). The major capital equipment expense is not just the upfront cost of the planter, additional expense is needed for a combine head.

(5)

2/21/2019 Corn Row Spacing Considerations | Integrated Crop Management

https://crops.extension.iastate.edu/cropnews/2018/03/corn-row-spacing-considerations 3/4

Equipment costs should be taken into account and balanced against the returns from a possible yield increase half of the years and a negligible difference in yield for the remaining years. With the likelihood of improving soybean yields with narrow row

spacing, it may be worthwhile to have equipment, such as a split-row planter, that can be used to plant both corn and soybean thus helping to mitigate the cost.

In conclusion, 20-inch row spacing in corn has shown to provide a comparable yield and even a yield advantage to the typical 30-inch row spacing. If narrow row spacing is

feasible, there could be benefits for both corn and soybean yields, as well as benefits for weed control and soil moisture retention. Narrow row spacing will require alterations to existing equipment or alternative methods for harvesting and possibly pesticide

applications.

References

Farnham, D.E. 2001. Row Spacing, Plant Density, and Hybrid Effects on Corn Grain Yield and Moisture. Agron. J. 93:1049-1053.

Licht, M., E. Wright, M. Baum, and N. Upah. 2017. Corn planting decisions: What’s changed and what’s the same? Integrated Crop Management Conference, Iowa State University, Ames, IA. 29-30 Nov 2017.

Porter, P.M., D.R. Hicks, W.E. Lueschen, J.H. Ford, D.D. Warnes, and T.R. Hoverstad. 1997. Corn response to row width and plant density in the Northern Corn Belt. J. Prod. Agric. 10:293-300.

Widdicombe, W.D., and K.D. Thelen. 2002. Row width and plant density effects on corn grain production in the Northern Corn Belt. Agron. J. 94:1020-1023.

Links to this article are strongly encouraged, and this article may be republished without further permission if published as written and if credit is given to the author, Integrated Crop Management News, and Iowa State University Extension and Outreach. If this article is to be used in any other manner, permission from the author is required. This article was originally published on March 12, 2018. The information contained within may not be the most current and accurate depending on when it is accessed.

(6)

Crop:

Corn

Tags: Corn row spacing corn management Authors:

Emily Wright

Mark Licht Assistant Professor

Dr. Mark Licht is an assistant professor and extension cropping systems specialist with Iowa State University Extension and Outreach. His extension, research and teaching program is focused on how to holistically manage Iowa cropping systems to achieve productivity, profitability and en...

References

Related documents

Findings revealed that knowledge sharing had coefficient of estimate which was significant based on β2 = 0.614 (p- value=0.000 which is less than α= 0.05), implying

5.1 With a (16Mbps, 50ms) network, many of the websites with a substantial increase in complexity do not see a proportionate degradation in page load times. Among the sites with

(2014) proposed a novel segmentation by adaptive traditional region-based color segmentation method using tissue-like P system (membrane algorithm).. Isawasan,

The analysis was conducted on the impulse response function and forecast error variance decompositions (FEDVs) to determine the effect of exchange rate to import price and

Foreign agents not experiencing a liquidity shock may either purchase these goods with bank money, or may choose to liquidate their bank balances for silver, which can then be used

In the context of conformity standards, remedies and unfair terms, it is submitted that business self-interest and consumer self-reliance might be prioritised in the following ways: