• No results found

Independent Guided Study

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Independent Guided Study"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

MODULE DESCRIPTOR

TITLE Assessing Occupational Performance SI MODULE CODE 23-7367-00S

CREDITS 15

LEVEL 7

JACS CODE B930

SUBJECT GROUP HWB Occupational Therapy

DEPARTMENT Allied Health Professions

MODULE LEADER Melanie Bryer

MODULE STUDY HOURS (based on 10 hours per credit)* Scheduled Learning and Teaching Activities Placement (if applicable) Independent Guided Study Total Number of Study Hours 30 120 150 MODULE AIM

The module aims to develop your ability to determine a person’s occupational needs,

wishes, engagement and performance and to assess their functional potential taking account of disability, prognosis and environmental situation. It will enable you to evaluate the

purpose and range of standardised and non -standardised assessments appropriate to different areas of occupational therapy practice making use of relevant theory to justify this. The application of assessment outcomes to intervention strategies will also be considered.

MODULE LEARNING OUTCOMES

By engaging successfully with this module as a student you will be able to:

1. Critically appraise different assessment theories and approaches and consider

their merits with regard to use with people who have complex needs from a

variety of settings and also in relation to a current evidence base

2. Evaluate a variety of assessment tools including standardised, formal non

-standardised assessments and assessment equipment, in order to be able to

appropriately select and carry out different methods of assessment safely

3. Critically discuss the purpose and value of assessment for both service users

and health and social care personnel, taking into consideration other relevant

issues such as resource constraints, policies and environmental considerations

4. Apply assessment information to formulate relevant SMART goals and identify

potential interventions for people with complex and long term needs within a

variety of practice settings

(2)

INDICATIVE CONTENT

These are examples of the possible (indicative) content of this module:  evidence base and best practice

 assessment philosophy, purpose, processes, strategies and techniques  standardized and non-standardised assessments, outcome measures  generic and profession-specific assessments

 assessment skills; observation, verbal and written communication, numeracy and accuracy in recording

 determining functional performance, deficits and potential through assessment, including psychological, physical, cultural and environmental dimensions

 assessments common in practice; eg self- care, domestic, mobility/gait, wheelchair, cognitive /perceptual assessments, physical (Local), productivity, vocational

 Falls assessments/Home Hazards  environmental assessment / home visits

 motivating and engaging the service user in decision-making, client centred practice  ethics and risk in assessment

 interpreting assessment data

 using assessment information to establish goals, plan an intervention strategy  technology and assessment

LEARNING, TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT - STRATEGY AND METHODS

An introductory session will orientate you to the requirements of the module.

Keynote lectures and seminars will introduce you to the theory and practice of assessment and range of assessment strategies as related to various user groups. Assessment

outcomes will be considered in relation to key features of some common/ long term conditions in these sessions.

During workshops, you will explore and critically appraise different assessments and tools drawing on placement experiences and sharing these exemplars with your peers in the university setting.

The development of your knowledge will be promoted through various learning strategies and supported by Blackboard. You will be encouraged to make use of appropriate research studies related to assessment and clientele.

Tutorial support will be provided for assignment development.

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION

The assignment is a 3000 word written paper that explores and evaluates the assessment of an individual selected from your practice placement. The case study selected will be

negotiated with your practice educator. Service user and placement anonymity and confidentiality will be maintained.

TWO assessments, will be critically compared and contrasted. Where possible, one of these should normally include a standardised assessment. Assessment findings and/or outcomes will be critically evaluated. The assignment should be supported throughout by appropriate theory and evidence and related to the case study.

(3)

Task No.* Short Description of Task SI Code EX/CW/PR Task Weightin g % Word Count or Exam Duration** In-module retrieval available 1 Written assignment CW 100 % 3000 words N FEEDBACK Formative feedback

Throughout the module you will have the opportunity to take part in a range of classroom learning opportunities and you will be guided to reflect on your learning.

Tutorial support will be provided to enable development of the assignment. Summative feedback

Feedback on your assignment will be provided once internal moderation has taken place and within the period set by university guidelines. Feedback will address to what extent you have met the learning outcomes and will give you specific guidance on areas for

improvement.

LEARNING RESOURCES FOR THIS MODULE (INCLUDING READING LISTS)

This module is supported by an on-line module resource list (RLO) which is updated year on year. Below is an indication of some of the resources you may find relevant.

Resources

Selected current standardised assessments Examples of non-standardised assessments Case studies

Assessment technology and Equipment; e.g. E Link, IT Apps.

College of Occupational Therapists Publications & Guidelines; reports, publications etc. Journals

American Journal of Occupational Therapy Australian Occupational therapy journal British Journal of Occupational Therapy Canadian Journal of Occupational therapy

References

BRYANT, Wendy, FIELDHOUSE, Jon and BANNIGAN, Katrina (eds.) (2014). Creek's Occupational Therapy and Mental Health. 5th ed. London, Churchill Livingstone.

BONIFACE, Gail, SEYMOUR, Alison, LEWIS, Karen and JAMES, Sharon (2012). Using Reed and Sanderson's Model of Adaptation through Occupation: A Journey. London, Blackwell Publishing Co.

(4)

BOYT SCHELL, Barbara A., GILLEN, Glen, SCAFFA, Marjorie E. and COHN, Ellen S. (eds.) (2014). Willard and Spackman's Occupational therapy. 12th ed. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

.

Creek, Jennifer (2003). Occupational therapy defined as a complex intervention. London: College of Occupational Therapists.

DUNCAN, Edward A. S. (ed.) (2011). Foundations for Practice in Occupational Therapy. London, Churchill Livingstone.

JONES, Karen (2014). Neurological Assessment; a Clinicans Guide. London, Churchill Livingstone.

Kramer, Paula, Hinojosa, Jim and Brasic Royeen, Charlotte, (2003). Perspectives in Human Occupation. London, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

PENDLETON, Heidi McHugh and SCHULTZ - KROHN, Winifred (eds.) (2013). Pedretti's Occupational Therapy; Practice skills for Physical dysfunction. 7th ed. Oxford, Elsevier. RADOMSKI, Mary Vining and TROMBLY, Catherine A. (eds.) (2014). Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction. 7th ed. Philadelphia, Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. REYNOLDS, Francis (2005). Communication and clinical effectiveness in rehabilitation. Edinburgh, Elsevier.

WALLACE, Caroline and DAVIES, Michelle (2009). Sharing assessment in Health & Social Care; a Practical handbook for Inter-professional working. Sage.

(5)

SECTION 2 MODULE INFORMATION FOR STAFF ONLY

MODULE DELIVERY AND ASSESSMENT MANAGEMENT INFORMATION MODULE STATUS - INDICATE IF ANY CHANGES BEING MADE

NEW MODULE N

EXISTING MODULE - NO CHANGE* N

Title Change Level Change Credit Change

Assessment Pattern Change Y

Change to Delivery Pattern

Date the changes (or new module) will be implemented 11/01/2016 *slightly revised learning outcomes

MODULE DELIVERY PATTERN - Give details of the start and end dates for each module.

If the course has more than one intake, for example, September and January, please give details of the module start and end dates for each intake.

Module Begins Module Ends

Course Intake 1 08/09/2016 15/12/2016

Course Intake 2 DD/MM/YYYY DD/MM/YYYY

Course Intake 3 DD/MM/YYYY DD/MM/YYYY

Is timetabled contact time required for this module? Y Are any staff teaching on this module non-SHU employees? Y If yes, please give details of the employer institution(s) below Various NHS Trusts

What proportion of the module is taught by these non-SHU staff, expressed as a percentage?

25%

MODULE ASSESSMENT INFORMATION Indicate how the module will be marked

*Overall PERCENTAGE Mark of 40% Y

*Overall PASS / FAIL Grade N

*Choose one only – module cannot include both percentage mark and pass/fail graded tasks

SUB-TASKS

Will any sub-tasks (activities) be used as part of the assessment strategy for this module?

N If sub-tasks / activities are to be used this must be approved within the Faculty prior to approval. Sub-task / activity marks will be recorded locally and extenuating circumstances, extensions, referrals and deferrals will not apply to sub-tasks / activities.

FINAL TASK

According to the Assessment Information shown in the Module

Descriptor, which task will be the LAST TASK to be taken or handed-in? (Give task number as shown in the Assessment Information Grid in Section 1 of the Descriptor)

1

NON-STANDARD ASSESSMENT PATTERNS

MARK 'X' IN BOX IF MODULE ASSESSMENT PATTERN IS NON STANDARD, eg MODEL B, ALL TASKS MUST BE PASSED AT 40%.

NB: Non-standard assessment patterns are subject to faculty agreement and approval by Registry Services - see guidance. notes.

(6)

CHECKED

Date Reason

References

Related documents

The Emergency Services Foundation restructured their fundraising plan to garner funding from for-profit businesses through corporate partnerships.. ESF

First, the Institute offers a diverse array of resources, programs and services: in education to students and teachers; in public information through broadcast, Web, and print media;

Finally, we define the warm threshold to be a level of resource utilization that is sufficiently high to justify having the server running but not so high as to risk becoming

Pitching arm range of motion was analyzed using a 2x2 ANOVA (Treatment x Rotation) for each inning, with repeated measures on both factors. Here, treatment was either

Figure 15 shows the trace of the Cholesky factorization for the same example as above (a matrix of size 30 K a node of the system D) when using the hardware-guided data

You know, he went to an all Black Catholic school, that was one of the most important things that I wanted for him, is to be around children that were like him…Once we got, once

David Rioja Redondo Telecommunication Engineer Englobe Technologies and Systems...

Website Sponsor Page WMC Website Home Page WMC Email Promotions WMC Media Placements Logo Placement on Sample Sack The List Website Index Page Guide Publication Masthead The List