• No results found

Managing Problems and Change

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Managing Problems and Change"

Copied!
24
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Copyright © PMA 2002

Polarity Map ™

0

Copyright © PMA 2002

Polarity Map ™

0

APPA Public Power Manager Certificate

Managing Problems and Change

(2)

Objectives

Understand How and Prepare to Manage Chronic

Problems and Change

– Complexity

– Seeing The Forest and The Trees

– Change

– Convert resistance into a resource for Stability and Change

– Chronic Issues

– Convert chronic problems into ongoing opportunities

By Learning

– The value of either/or thinking

– The value of both/and thinking

– To distinguish between problems to solve and polarities to manage

– The steps for managing polarities well over time

(3)

Copyright © PMA 2002

Polarity Map ™

2

Copyright © PMA 2002

Polarity Map ™

2

Agenda

• Managing Unsolvable Problems and change

– Step 1: Define the Issue

– Step 2: Include Key Stakeholders

– Step 3: Build the Polarity Map

– Step 4: Understand how Polarities Work

– Step 5: Assess Realities within this Polarity

– Step 6: Action Steps & Early Warnings

• Learning Curve

(4)

Polarity Management in our Lives

Some typical uses of PM

• Change management

• Conflict resolution

• Negotiation

• Diversity

• Emotional Intelligence: intra and inter-personal

• Leadership or organizational assessment

• Coaching

(5)

Copyright © PMA 2002

Polarity Map ™

4

Copyright © PMA 2002

Polarity Map ™

4

The Value and Power of Either/Or Thinking

Positive results from Either/Or Thinking

Either/Or Thinking is essential for one generation

to pass key elements of its culture on to the

next generation:

1.

Language – How do you spell ________?

2.

Mathematics – 4+4= _____ ?

3.

History – Who was the conqueror of Mexico?

Bernal Diaz del Castillo ____?

Cuauhtemoc ____?

Hernan Cortez ____?

Benito Juarez ____ ?

4.

Science – Why do apples fall down off trees

rather than up? _____________________

5.

Morals – According to many cultures and

religions murder is:

Right ____ Wrong ____

Negative results from rejecting Either/Or

Thinking

Without Either/Or Thinking, one generation could

not pass key elements of its culture to the next

generation:

1.

Can’t learn Language

2.

Can’t learn Mathematics

3.

Have no sense of History

4.

Do not understand the basics of how the world

works.

5.

No moral compass – don’t know the difference

between right and wrong.

Two important results from getting the right answer:

Success and rewards = “A” grades etc.

When you are right, those who disagree with

you are wrong.

(6)

Problem or Polarity? – Contrasts

Problems to Solve

They are not ongoing.

There is an end point.

They are solvable.

Independent Alternatives

They can stand alone.

There is no need to include an alternative for the

solution to work.

Often contain mutually exclusive opposites.

1.Should we promote Chris?

2.What should we include in our customer survey?

3.Should we buy the training video?

4.When was the war of 1812?

Polarities to Manage

They are ongoing.

There is no end point.

They are not solvable.

They must be managed together.

Interdependent Alternatives

They cannot stand alone.

The alternatives need each other to optimize the

situation over time.

Always contain mutually inclusive opposites.

1.Tough Love and Gentle Love

2.Individual and Team

3.Cost and Quality

4.Competing and Collaborating

5.Work and Home

(7)

Copyright © PMA 2002

Polarity Map ™

6

Copyright © PMA 2002

Polarity Map ™

6

Problem or Polarity? – Quiz Definitions:

Problems to solve have:

1. One right answer:

“If I’m right, my opposition is wrong.”

2. Two or more right answers that are independent:

“There’s more than one way to skin a cat.”

Polarities to manage have:

1. Two right answers that are interdependent:

“My opposition and I are not only both right,

we are each dependent on the other’s truth

over time.”

4 Lenses (Criteria) for Polarities: Yes = Polarity No = Problem

1. Is the difficulty ongoing, like breathing?

2. Are the alternatives interdependent?

Imagine a polarity map:

3. Are there 2 or more necessary upsides?

(8)

Problem or Polarity? – Quiz

Issue

Lens #

Yes

No

Polarity/Problem?

Criteria used?

1. Where do we go for lunch? Sam likes, “Wanda’s

Wonder Bar” and Linda likes, “The Nostalgic Noodle.”

1

2

Y

Y

N

N

2. We have to get rid of our silo mentality. Let’s break

down the barriers and become an integrated team.

1

2

Y

Y

N

N

3. How do we get to the top of this mountain?

1

2

Y

Y

N

N

4. We are becoming an international company. How do we

get our people to think globally?

1

2

Y

Y

N

N

5. Should we merge with “Mega-Corp.?” It would certainly

help our capitalization.

1

2

Y

Y

N

N

6. How do we get union support for our major,

company-wide change effort?

1

2

Y

Y

N

N

7. Our Swedish partners have to talk to everyone before

1

2

Y

Y

N

N

(9)

Copyright © PMA 2002

Polarity Map ™

8

Copyright © PMA 2002

Polarity Map ™

8

The Polarity Management™ Process – 6 Steps

2 - Include

Key Stakeholders

1 - Define the Issue

Polarity

Paradox

Dilemma

3 - Build the

Polarity Map

5 - Assess Realities

With This Polarity

4 - Understand

How Polarities Work

6 - Action Steps

(10)

Step 1 - Define the Issue

1. Select a partner

2. Individually: (1 minute)

As you consider your role and the most

important things you are dealing with today…

What are the most exciting possibilities?

What are the most difficult, chronic problems?

(11)

Copyright © PMA 2002

Polarity Map ™

10

Copyright © PMA 2002

Polarity Map ™

10

3 Criteria for focusing on an issue

Is there

energy

to address the issue (frustration or

excitement)?

Does the issue seem to be centered around a

polarity

or does

it appear to be a problem to solve?

Is the issue ongoing like breathing?

Are the alternatives interdependent?

Are there two or more necessary upsides?

Will over focus on one pole undermine the higher purpose?

Can you possibly

impact

this issue directly or indirectly (e.g.,

(12)

Step 1 - Define the Issue

1.

Select a partner

2.

Individually: (1 minute) Consider your role and the most important things you are

dealing with today…

What are your most exciting possibilities?

What are your most difficult, chronic problems?

3.

Individually: Choose one possibility or one problem to work on:

(13)

Copyright © PMA 2002

Polarity Map ™

12

Copyright © PMA 2002

Polarity Map ™

12

Step 2 – Include Key Stakeholders

Who are the key stakeholders who will be influenced by and/or

could influence your plans for your issue?

(Name the groups or

individuals…both internal and external.)

__________________________________________________

__________________________________________________

__________________________________________________

As you are working on this issue, keep these stakeholders in

mind as you create a “rough draft” of a Polarity Map® and

action plans.

(14)

Values = positive results of focus on the

left pole

Values = positive results of focus on the

right pole

Fears = negative results of over-focus on the

left pole to the neglect of the right pole

Fears = negative results of over-focus on the

right pole to the neglect of the left pole

Greater Purpose Statement (GPS) - why balance this polarity?

*

**

and

Why?

negative results

of over-focusing

on Stability

to the neglect

of Change

neutral name

of Left Pole

positive results

of focusing on

Stability

negative results

of over-focusing

on Change

to the neglect

of Stability

neutral name

of Right Pole

positive results

of focusing on

Change

Greater Purpose

Statement (GPS)

Step 3 – Build the Polarity Map:

Guide to Polarity Map Content

1.

2.

3.

4.

1.

2.

3.

4.

1.

2.

3.

4.

1.

2.

3.

4.

Stability

Change

(15)

Copyright © PMA 2002

Polarity Map ™

14

Copyright © PMA 2002

Polarity Map ™

14

Values = positive results of focus on the

left pole

Values = positive results of focus on the

right pole

Fears = negative results of over-focus on the

left pole to the neglect of the right pole

Fears = negative results of over-focus on the

right pole to the neglect of the left pole

Greater Purpose Statement (GPS) - why balance this polarity?

*

Deeper Fear from lack of balance

**

Polarity Map™ © 1992, 2008 Polarity Management Associates, LLC / * Thanks to John Scherer, The Scherer

Leadership Center / ** Thanks to De Wit & Meyer BV / *** Thanks to Todd Johnson, Rivertown Consultants

and

Action Steps

How will we gain or maintain the positive

results from focusing on this left pole?

What? Who? By When? Measures?

Action Steps

How will we gain or maintain the positive

results from focusing on this right pole?

What? Who? By When? Measures?

Early Warnings

***

Measurable indicators (things you can

count) that will let you know that you are

getting into the downside of this left pole.

Early Warnings

Measurable indicators (things you can

count) that will let you know that you are

getting into the downside of this right pole.

Step 3 – Build The Polarity Map

(16)

Identifying the Greater Purpose* and Deeper Fear

What is the benefit of identifying a greater purpose?

• Identifies a value shared by those preferring opposites poles – a Greater Purpose

both

sides can agree to.

• Helps people who favor different poles to have an agreed upon greater purpose that

makes it worth the effort to capitalize on their differences to get the upsides of both poles.

Example: those preferring stability and those preferring change, might find a common

greater purpose in “Gain Competitive Advantage” which would encourage them to both

respect Core Values and seek New Energy and Direction.

What the impact of the deeper fear?

The deeper fear is the negative opposite of the “Greater Purpose” and provides a clear

reason to avoid the downsides of each pole.

Example: the negative opposite of the greater purpose, “Gain Competitive Advantage”

could be “Can’t Compete” or “Go Out of Business.” This is the deeper consequence from

either downside of the Stability and Change polarity.

(17)

Copyright © PMA 2002

Polarity Map ™

16

Copyright © PMA 2002

Polarity Map ™

16

MAPPING TIPS

Poles should be neutral or positive.

The diagonal quadrants will be opposites.

Quadrants should be evenly populated.

If the content in the left quadrant is the same as the content in the right

quadrant, distinguish why the content belongs in each quadrant.

(e.g., if the poles are candor and diplomacy… Candor

contributes

to good relationships

because people trust one another to be

honest. Diplomacy

contributes to good relationships

because

people respect how others feel.)

Your greater purpose should be mutually attractive and unifying. Your

deeper fear should also be unifying and mutually objectionable.

(For example, you might use

Exceptional Performance & Results

as your greater purpose and

Poor Performance & Results

as your

deeper fear.)

(18)

Change

Stability

and

Change

Stability

and

Well Managed Polarity

Overemphasis on Stability

Overemphasis on Change

Step 4 – Understand How Polarities Work

Change

Stability

and

Continuity

Core Values

Tap Past & Present Wisdom

New Energy and

Direction

Creativity

Tap New Wisdom

Stagnation

Loss of Energy

Missed Opportunities

Lose Continuity

Lose Core Values

Foolish Risks

Continuity

Core Values

Tap Past & Present Wisdom

New Energy and

Direction

Creativity

Tap New Wisdom

Stagnation

Loss of Energy

Missed Opportunities

Lose Continuity

Lose Core Values

Foolish Risks

Continuity

Core Values

Tap Past & Present Wisdom

New Energy and

Direction

Creativity

Tap New Wisdom

Stagnation

Loss of Energy

Missed Opportunities

Lose Continuity

Lose Core Values

Foolish Risks

COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

CAN’T COMPETE

(19)

Copyright © PMA 2002

Polarity Map ™

18

Copyright © PMA 2002

Polarity Map ™

18

Step 5 – Assess Realities With This Polarity

The step of assessment includes a set of questions to understand what are the current realities with

this particular polarity for this client:

• What is our history with this polarity? You will have been managing this polarity in the past

though probably unintentionally. Have there been oscillations between the poles over time?

• Where are we today? You can do a quick, rough assessment by doing a “trend arrow:” The

trend arrow is an arrow indicating a self-correction from the downside of one pole to the

upside of the other. At this time, is the trend or general “push” in the organization from the

downside of the left pole to the upside of the right or, from the downside of the right pole to

the upside of the left?

• Who is supporting the self-correction to the new pole and who is holding on to the present

pole?

• How will we approach the conversation between the two points of view? In most cases it is

useful to listen first to those least able to hear the other side to make it easier for them to

hear after they have been heard.

• Will it be useful to use the getting unstuck process? How would that work in this situation?

• Will it be helpful to anticipate the learning curve? How might that be articulated in this

(20)

Values = positive results of focus on the

left pole

Values = positive results of focus on the

right pole

Fears = negative results of over-focus on the

left pole to the neglect of the right pole

Fears = negative results of over-focus on the

right pole to the neglect of the left pole

Greater Purpose Statement (GPS) - why balance this polarity?

*

and

Action Steps

How will we gain or maintain the positive

results from focusing on this left pole?

What? Who? By When? Measures?

Action Steps

How will we gain or maintain the positive

results from focusing on this right pole?

What? Who? By When? Measures?

Early Warnings

***

Measurable indicators (things you can

count) that will let you know that you are

getting into the downside of this left pole.

Early Warnings

Measurable indicators (things you can

count) that will let you know that you are

getting into the downside of this right pole.

Step 6 – Complete Action Steps and Early Warnings

How will we gain or maintain

the positive results from

focusing on each pole?

What Action Steps will be taken?

Who will be accountable?

When? By date or frequency?

Measures of improvement?

What will be observable /

measurable Early Warning

indicators that will let you know

you are in the downside of each

pole? Who will know?

(21)

Copyright © PMA 2002

Polarity Map ™

20

Copyright © PMA 2002

Polarity Map ™

20

Anticipating the Learning Curve

1. When a shift to another pole represents

a relatively new experience, you are

likely to get the downside of the new

pole before its upside.

2. Those resisting the move to the relatively new pole

are asked to:

a. Hold onto the upside of their preferred pole;

b. Tolerate, to some degree, the downside of

their less preferred pole as part of the

learning process.

(22)

Values = positive results of focus on the left pole

Values = positive results of focus on the right pole

Fears = negative results of over-focus on the left pole to the neglect of

the right pole

Fears = negative results of over-focus on the right pole to the neglect of

the left pole

Greater Purpose Statement (GPS) - why balance this polarity?

*

**

and

Polarity Management

®

Map

Competitive Advantage

1. Identify final answers

2. Enjoy a sense of accomplishment

3. Move on to new opportunities and challenges

1. Save time by identifying and managing

difficulties that cannot be solves

2. Accelerate desired change

3. Sustained desired change and avoid

pendulum swings

1. Waste time by trying to resolve difficulties

that cannot be solved

2. Slow down desired change

3. Go back and forth on decisions

1. No final solutions to issues that could be solved

2. No sense of accomplishment

3. Stuck and never ready to move on

(23)

Copyright © PMA 2002 Polarity Map ™

22

Copyright © PMA 2002 Polarity Map ™

22

Getting Unstuck

Fears, concerns

Values

Problems

Solutions

Higher Purpose

Deeper Fear

Future

Past/Present

1

3

2

4

5

(24)

Seidler & Associates, LLC

1260 Winchester Dr.

Charleston, SC 29407

Phone: 843.573.3485

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.mypowersurge.com

References

Related documents

Whatever the reason for the increased growth in the collaborative treatment group, second language instructors should consider incorporating cooperative learning

[r]

Using a panel data model and GLS estimation method, we investigated the effect of methanol, propane, and urea prices along with financial variables on stock returns of

Although premiums for D&O liability insurance in the private sector are expected to continue to decline in 2015, those companies with public exposures — especially those

Efficacy of rabies vaccines against Duvenhage virus isolated from European house bats ( Eptesicus serotinus ), classic rabies and rabies-related viruses. Human rabies vaccines

in a Case Previously Reported as "Nutritional Anemia in an Infant Responding to PERNICIOUS ANEMIA IN AN EIGHT YEAR OLD GIRL: Additional

present study is thus intended to investigate the comparative dose- related effects of artemether-lumefantrine and its combinant drugs: artemether and lumefantrine (represented by

Secondary research question #5: Among 2014 and 2015 high school graduates from four large Oregon school districts who entered an Oregon public 4-year postsecondary institution the