• No results found

How To Write A Social Work Article

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "How To Write A Social Work Article"

Copied!
69
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Social Work

Handbook for

Final

Placement

Guidelines for Students

and Practice Educators

BA3

Academic Year

2014 – 2015

Faculty of Health, Psychology

and Social Care

School of Social Work

Birley Building

15 Bonsall Street

Manchester M15 6GX

www.hpsc.mmu.ac.uk/ppl

(2)
(3)

Can we begin by thanking you for accepting a student on placement. As a social work programme we are entirely dependent on our good relationships with Practice Educators and agencies to ensure that our students are provided with good quality learning opportunities to ensure they progress to become good quality social workers. This, of course, is in everyone’s best interests, most notably the users of the services in which we are engaged. We know that without you, this simply couldn’t happen.

The new requirements for the degree and post graduate degree in Social Work are now well established and these are based on the National Occupational Standards. In Greater Manchester there has been considerable work completed on 'harmonising' the placement process for all the programmes so that there are more or less the same expectations for agencies and students across the region.

We are very keen to ensure Practice Educators feel fully supported in their role and we are providing an ongoing range of support meetings at MMU which we hope you will attend to learn more about the placement process, gain support for the issues stemming from your experience and to feedback to us on the degree. Thank you once again for the learning opportunities you are providing for this student and good luck!

Social Work Programme Team

The Layout of the Handbook

The Social Work Practice Placement Handbook provides general guidance and information relating to the degree programmes offered by Manchester Metropolitan University. This handbook is laid out in sections so that particular information can be easily accessed by Practice Educators and students. Section 1 details the preparation students undertake prior to going out on placement and the process of placement.

Section 2 deals with the roles of those involved in the placement and their respective responsibilities.

Section 3 outlines the assessment requirements and the contents of the portfolio that the student is expected to compile.

Section 4 covers the policies and procedures relevant to practice placements.

Section 5 includes the National Occupational Standards for Social Work Key Roles 4, 5 & 6 and the HCPC Guidance on Conduct and Ethics for Students elements that students must provide evidence for.

PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL PRO FORMAS AND DOCUMENTS FOR COMPLETION FOR THE PORTFOLIO ARE AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD FROM:

(4)
(5)

Contents FOREWORD 1 SECTION 1 Introduction 7 Process of Placement 8 SECTION 2

Roles of personnel involved in placement 11 Guidance on Placement Related Academic Assignments 17 Learning opportunities 19 Methods for obtaining evidence 20

SECTION 3

Requirements of students in assessed placements 25

Portfolio Requirements 27

Guidelines for completing portfolio - anonymity 28 Guidelines for completing portfolio – Record Of Evidence 29 Placement Related Assignments 32 Practice Educator Report 39

SECTION 4

Programme Practice Assessment Panel 43

Problems on placement 44

Procedure for implementing anti-discriminatory policy 52 MMU Social Work Course anti-discriminatory position statement 54

Health and Safety Requirements 55

SECTION 5: APPENDIX

Appendix 1: National occupational Standards for Social Work Key Roles 4, 5 and 6

HCPC Guidance on Conduct and Ethics for Students

60 65

(6)
(7)

Section 1

Introduction

(8)
(9)

Introduction to BA And MA in Social Work To Practice Educators

As previously stated the requirements for the social work degree are based on the National Occupational Standards (NOS) for qualified social workers. These standards are underpinned by the HCPC Guidance on Conduct and Ethics for Students (GC&ES) (* see weblink at bottom of page). Students on the degree course at MMU will be assessed, and must produce evidence that they have met the requirements of both the NOS and the COP.

The practice element of the BA and MA in Social Work constitutes a major part of the education required for qualification. At MMU there are two placements on this programme. Both are of 100 days duration.

The guidelines in this handbook are based on the Department of Health’s Requirements for Social Work Training (2002) and are reflected in the MA and BA Course Handbooks, which students should have as a companion to this document.

(10)

Process Of Placement

The following flow chart gives an outline of the process in which students and Practice

Educators will follow prior to and throughout the 100-days placement:

INFORMAL MEETING BETWEEN STUDENT AND PE

or ON-SITE SUPERVISOR (where applicable) –

after which agreement to take student will be reached

PRE-PLACEMENT MEETING – at which placement agreement is drawn up and date for

commencement of placement agreed - this must be attended by the student, Practice

Educator, tutor and on-site supervisor (where applicable)

PLACEMENT COMMENCES

Induction period

Work allocated to student

Regular supervision (formal and informal) of student

MID-PLACEMENT REVIEW MEETING – between 50 and 55 days into placement

this must be attended by the student, Practice Educator, tutor and on-site supervisor

(where applicable)

STUDENT GIVES COMPLETED PORTFOLIO OF EVIDENCE TO PRACTICE EDUCATOR (2

WEEKS PRIOR TO END OF PLACEMENT)

PRACTICE EDUCATOR’S ASSESSMENT REPORT WRITTEN AND SHOWN TO STUDENT – THIS

MUST BE SIGNED BY BOTH PE AND STUDENT

FINAL PLACEMENT MEETING AT WHICH PORTFOLIO CONTENTS AND SIGNATURES MUST

BE CHECKED

STUDENT HANDS PORTFOLIO IN TO UNIVERSITY STUDENT HUB OFFICE ON AGREED

DATE

(11)

Section Two

(12)
(13)

Roles of Personnel Involved in Placement

Practice Educator

A student on placement will need to have a Practice Educator to undertake their support, teaching and assessment. In most cases this person will be based in the same setting as the student and is known as an ON-SITE PRACTICE EDUCATOR. In some instances there may be no one to undertake this role in the placement setting. In these instances the University will supply someone from their ‘pool’ of Practice Educators to undertake this role. This person will be known as the OFF-SITE PRACTICE EDUCATOR. The roles of both on-site Practice Educators and off-site Practice Educators will be similar but there are some differences. The roles of both are outlined below.

On-Site Supervisor

Where an off-site Practice Educator is appointed there will need to also be an on-site supervisor. This person will be a senior member of staff based in the placement setting who is responsible for the day to day monitoring and supervision of the student. The role of this person is outlined below.

Tutor

Each student will have an individual tutor, from the university, who is responsible for supporting the student and liaising with the placement personnel throughout the duration of the placement. The tutor’s role is outlined below.

Role of On-Site Practice Educator (i.e. Where Practice Educator is based in same agency) Practice Educators are expected to:

1. Provide a range of work and learning opportunities suitable to successful practice and assessment of required areas of competence.

2. Complete with student and tutor, a Pre-Placement Agreement Form

3. Provide the student with an environment free from oppression, harassment and exploitation. 4. Set up an induction programme for the student of no less than 2 weeks duration. This should

involve shadowing colleagues within the team, meeting colleagues from other related agencies, introduction to service users and familiarisation with agency policies and procedures.

5. Provide a pre-arranged period of supervision of not less than the equivalent of one hour per week, which should normally take place on a weekly basis. There may be situations when this is not appropriate/possible and therefore an equivalent period of supervision should be arranged. Supervision should not occur any less frequently than fortnightly. These sessions should be recorded and this recording shared with the student. Also the record of supervision should be dated and signed

6. Assist the student to develop a theoretical understanding and evaluation of their work. 7. Undertake direct observation of the student. The University requires that students' practice

must be directly observed in relation to the National Occupational Standards (NOS) for social work. Direct observation of practice must take place a minimum of three times in each placement, and a record of each included in the student’s portfolio.

Two of the observations should be undertaken by the designated Practice Educator and one may be undertaken by another suitably qualified/experienced member of staff in the placement. Where there may be any deviation from this requirement e.g. where fewer than 2 observations

(14)

can be carried out by the designated Practice Educator MMU’s Practice Learning Team must be notified and involved in discussions concerning this. An explanation regarding the reason for this should be included in the portfolio with the direct observation reports. This should only occur in exceptional circumstances.

* Where a member of staff other than the PE is undertaking a direct observation the PE should ensure the suitability of that person and must also ensure that they are aware of the

requirements to highlight the evidence demonstrated under the key roles and the HCPC GC&ES and that the direct observation pro-forma is completed appropriately.

8. Contribute to completion of the Mid-Point Review Form. Please note: Sections 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7 of the Mid-Point Review form should be completed by the student and PE before the mid-point meeting in readiness for discussion at that meeting.

9. Prepare an assessment report on the student. It is the responsibility of the Practice Educator to make a recommendation of pass or fail. Where a failure is recorded the Practice Educator must have consulted the MMU Practice Learning Team. A second opinion will then be sought (see page 51).

10. Provide written and verbal input into the second opinion process where there is a fail recommendation.

11. Confirm that the student’s portfolio is suitably anonymised (see guidelines, page 28 and appendix 6)

12. Read , assess and verify the student’s 3 written assignments (see section below on Guidance on Placement Related Academic Assignments)

13. Practice Educators are, at all times, expected to adhere to the HCPC Standards of Conduct, Performance and Ethics.

Role of Off-Site Practice Educator (i.e. PE not based in same setting as student, and usually appointed by the University)

Off-site Practice Educators are expected to:

1. Liaise with the on-site supervisor about the provision of a range of work and learning

opportunities suitable to successful practice and assessment of required areas of competence. 2. Complete with student, tutor and on-site supervisor, a Placement Agreement Form

3. Liaise with the on-site supervisor to ensure, for the student, the provision of an environment free from oppression, harassment and exploitation.

4. Provide a pre-arranged period of supervision of not less than the equivalent of one hour per week, which should normally take place on a weekly basis. There may be situations when this is not appropriate / possible and therefore an equivalent period of supervision should be arranged. Supervision should not occur any less frequently than fortnightly. These sessions should be recorded and this recording shared with the student. Also the record of supervision should be dated and signed .

5. Meet with the student and on-site supervisor formally at least three times during the course of the placement (in addition to the Pre Placement meeting and Mid Point Review). These sessions should be recorded and this recording shared with the student.

6. Assist the student to develop a theoretical understanding and evaluation of their work.

7. Undertake direct observation of the student. The University requires that students' practice must be directly observed in relation to the National Occupational Standards (NOS) for social work.

(15)

Direct observation of practice must take place a minimum of three times in each placement, and a record of each included in the student’s portfolio (see appendix 5).

Two of the observations should be undertaken by the designated Practice Educator and one may be undertaken by another suitably qualified/experienced member of staff in the placement. Where there may be any deviation from this requirement e.g. where fewer than 2 observations can be carried out by the designated Practice Educator MMU’s Practice Learning Team must be notified and involved in discussions concerning this. An explanation regarding the reason for this should be included in the portfolio with the direct observation reports.This should only occur in exceptional circumstances.

Where a member of staff other than the PE is undertaking a direct observation the PE should ensure the suitability of that person and must also ensure that they are aware of the

requirements to highlight the evidence demonstrated under the key roles and the HCPC GC&ES and that the direct observation pro-forma is completed appropriately.

8. Contribute to completion of the Mid-Point Review Form. Please note: Sections 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7 of the Mid-Point Review form should be completed by the student and PE before the mid-point meeting in readiness for discussion at that meeting.

9. Prepare an assessment report on the student. It is the responsibility of the Practice Educator to make a recommendation of pass or fail. Where a failure is recorded the Practice Educator must have informed the MMU Practice Learning Team who arranged the placement. A second opinion will then be sought (see page 51

10. Provide written and verbal input into the second opinion process where there is a fail recommendation.

11. Confirm that the student’s portfolio is suitably anonymised (see guidelines, page 28 and appendix 6)

12. Read, assess and verify the student’s 3 written assignments (see section below on Guidance on Placement Related Academic Assignments)

13. Practice Educators are, at all times, expected to adhere to the HCPC Standards of Conduct, Performance and Ethics.

Role of on-site supervisor

The on-site supervisor is the person based in the placement setting responsible for the day to day support of a student where an off-site Practice Educator has been appointed.

On-site supervisors are expected to:

1. Liaise with the off-site Practice Educator about the provision of a range of work and learning opportunities suitable to successful practice and assessment of required areas of competence. This will include attendance at the formal pre-placement meeting and involvement in the drawing up of a pre-placement agreement; attendance at Mid Point Review and formal 3 way meetings with the student and off site PE.

2. Provide the student with an environment free from oppression, harassment and exploitation. 3. Set up an induction programme for the student of no less than 2 weeks duration. This should

involve shadowing colleagues within the team, meeting colleagues from other related agencies, introduction to service users and familiarisation with agency policies and procedures.

4. Allocate appropriate work to the student to enable them to meet the assessment requirements of the social work degree and the requirements of the placement agency. The on-site supervisor

(16)

must ensure they are familiar with the assessment requirements and written work required of the student in placement.

5. Offer day to day support of the student and be responsible for the operational supervision of their work.

6. Offer formal supervision to the student of a minimum of 1 hour per month. This is in addition to the formal supervision given by the designated Practice Educator.

7. Take part in the formative assessment of the student by:

• Meeting regularly with the Practice Educator and student to contribute their observations and agree the key roles, units and elements that the student has achieved. This should take place at least 3 times during the placement.

• Read the student’s assignments when completed and agree the accuracy of the work outlined in them.

• Attend the mid-point meeting and contribute their observations

• Attend the final placement meeting and contribute their observations.

8. Verify that the student has completed 100 days in placement and sign the placement attendance sheet. An off-site Practice Educator’s signature is not sufficient on this document.

9. Bring to the attention of the student, Practice Educator and tutor any concerns about the student’s practice, competence and behaviour on placement and take part in any formal meetings about concerns on placement if required.

Role of Tutor

The tutor has a responsibility to oversee the integration of the student's learning and development throughout all parts of the programme.

Tutors are expected to be involved in the following: 1. Initial pre-placement agreement meeting

Although they share the responsibility with the Practice Educator, tutors must ensure a placement agreement takes place prior to the commencement of the placement. The tutor must negotiate with the Practice Educator a clear understanding of the responsibility for recording this meeting and completing the Placement Agreement form. For some Practice Educators new to the programme it may be appropriate for the tutor to undertake this role. However those Practice Educators undertaking Practice Educator training may wish to take on this responsibility themselves

The tutor has a responsibility to enable the student to articulate their learning needs as clearly as possible to link these into the key tasks to be assessed and to help the Practice Educator begin to explore the learning opportunities that may be available in the placement setting to provide for these learning needs.

The Placement Agreement form should be completed prior to the placement commencing (see appendix 3). It should be seen as a basic document to be built on by the Practice Educator and student in the early stages of the placement when the match between learning needs and opportunities can be more clearly identified and recorded in the relevant list of competences. The tutor should ensure that these are reviewed at the mid-placement stage.

(17)

2. Mid-Point Review

At the Mid-Point Review the tutor will ensure that the pre-placement agreement is reviewed to identify progress towards the provision of learning opportunities and assessment of evidence towards Key Roles 4-6. The Mid-Point Report .prepared by the Practice Educator in conjunction with the student, will form the basis of this meeting. Tutors, Students and Practice Educators need to understand what evidence is to be supplied in the final placement report.

The tutor, along with the Practice Educator and student, will identify learning opportunities provided and work to be undertaken in the remainder of the placement. It is good practice to meet at the end of the placement and a date for a final placement meeting should be set. However, there may be occasions when this meeting is not required, for example all parties are in agreement that the placement has been successful and all necessary documentation and evidence is sufficient. In such circumstances the Final Placement Meeting could be cancelled providing that all relevant parties are in agreement and instead a three-way discussion should take place towards the end of the placement between tutor, student and Practice Educator.

3. Final Placement Meeting

A final placement meeting should take place wherever possible around the last week of the student’s placement. It is recognised that it may not always be possible for a tutor to attend a final meeting. In this case a three-way discussion should take place towards the end of the placement between tutor, student and Practice Educator.

At the final meeting the student’s portfolio should be presented complete with the Practice Educator’s report.

4. Meetings about difficulties in placement

If there are difficulties that arise during the placement or disagreements between the Practice Educator and student, the tutor has a role to offer consultancy to both student and Practice Educator to assist in resolving problems within the time remaining on placement. Information on the process in relation to concerns on placement can be found on page 49.

The "Procedure for Implementing Anti-Discriminatory Policy within Placements" (page 52) acknowledges that on occasions it may be appropriate for tutors to support and advise students without initially involving the Practice Educator. It is important for tutors to draw both Practice Educators’ and students’ attention to the Anti-Discrimination Position Statement and its

implication for placements.

If a student is identified as not meeting competence, or deemed to be engaging in

unprofessional conduct or there are other circumstances affecting the successful outcome of the placement, tutors will need to ensure both student and Practice Educator understand the

process of involving a "Second Opinion" Practice Educator. All requests for Second Opinion Practice Educator should be channelled through the Chair of the Practice Assessment Panel, via the placement coordinator, after a formal Concerns Meeting has been held

(18)

Role of student

Students are expected to:

1. Undertake the ‘Preparation for Practice Module’ in preparation for placement 1.

2. Engage in the range of practice and learning opportunities provided within the placement setting.

3. Conduct themselves within placement in accordance with the social work HCPC Guidance on Conduct and Ethics for Students and all relevant policies and procedures of the host

organisation

4. Prepare for, participate in and contribute to supervision and engage in reflective discussions regarding learning opportunities.

5. Attend supervision with the Practice Educator and/or work based supervisor on a regular basis and in accordance with the expectations laid down in the pre-placement agreement.

6. Gather, with the assistance of the Practice Educator, appropriate evidence of competence and construct a portfolio of such evidence in accordance with placement handbook requirements. 7. Keep a reflective log whilst on placement. The purpose of this log is to enable students to

reflect on their practice, their development and the agency in which they are placed. Student should bring this log to supervision with them and share their relevant areas of reflection with the Practice Educator. Reference to the use of the log may be used as evidence for the students portfolio and the PE report but the log should not be included in the portfolio.

(19)

GUIDANCE ON PLACEMENT RELATED ACADEMIC ASSIGNMENTS

Students have Placement Related Academic Assignments as follows:-

- Organisational Analysis - 2,000 words - Day 45 - Reflective Practice Analysis - 2,500 words - Day 60

- Case Study – 1,500 words - Day 75

- (Extended Study – 8,000 words)

These are detailed in Section 3 of this Handbook.

The Organisational Analysis, Reflective Practice Analysis and the Case Study are read and assessed by the Practice Educator and are not academically submitted. They must all reach the pass

requirement (see pages 37 & 38)

(The Extended Study, although placement related, is academically submitted on the date given in the BA3 Assessment Schedule. This may be after the placement is completed. The Extended Study does not need to be shared with or verified by the Practice Educator and does not form part of the placement portfolio).

The Organisational Analysis; the Reflective Practice Analysis and the Case Study are an integral part of the student’s evidence of their practice on placement. Copies of all of these assignments must be handed to the PE and emailed/given to the tutor on the dates agreed and all must be included in the students portfolio. Practice Educators are required to read these assignments and confirm the

validity of the content. This should be recorded in the Practice Educator’s assessment report.

Role of Practice Educator in Placement Related Academic Assignments (whether on-site

or off-site)

• the Organisational Analysis assignment is to be submitted at 45 days into the placement, the Reflective Practice Analysis is to be submitted at 60 days into placement and the Case Study is to be submitted at 75 days into placement

• These assignments will not be submitted to the University for academic marking. Instead, the student will submit them directly to the Practice Educator and Tutor. As these assignments are not academically marked, Practice Educators may read one draft of the student’s work, offering advice on improvements/developments, prior to this assignment being included in the student’s portfolio.

• Practice Educators provide teaching and support to students in developing a theoretical understanding and analysis of their practice. This applies to all referrals, cases and aspects of work in the context of normal supervision and should not include any special attention for work upon which assignments are based.

• If any of these assignments are deemed by the Practice Educator to have ‘Not Met Requirements’, (i.e. meet the requirements of a pass – see pages 37 & 38) the student should have the opportunity to rewrite it, with reference to the feedback given by the Practice Educator, and to resubmit it to the Practice Educator.

If the assignment is deemed for a second time to have ‘Not Met Requirements’, the

student should submit it as part of the portfolio for assessment to the Practice Assessment Panel (PAP) for their decision.

(20)

If the PAP concurs that the work has ‘not met requirements’, the student will be asked to undertake further work on the assignment prior to a second assessment by the PAP. In the event that the work is still deemed to have ‘not met requirements’, the portfolio will be submitted to an external examiner for their opinion. The recommendation of the external examiner will be made to the Exam Board.

Role of student in all placement related assignments

1. Students are expected to write assignments in their own time and must share what they have written with their Practice Educator and on-site supervisor.

2. Students must ensure they submit the assignments to their Practice Educator and tutor on the agreed date.

Role of Tutor in placement related assignments

1. Tutors will offer advice and opportunities for discussion to students developing a theoretical understanding and analysis of practice.

2. Tutors should give feedback to students on submitted non-marked assignments.

2. Tutors will not read drafts. They may however, see and comment on a plan of work, which should be no more than bullet points or sub-headings indicating the structure and content that the student wishes to follow.

3. During the period the student is on placement, contact with the tutor will continue. This will not only be concerning academic work, but may also concern other issues affecting the student's learning, including issues that arise on placement.

(21)

FURTHER ADVICE FOR PRACTICE EDUCATORS/ON-SITE SUPERVISORS LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES

Prior to the pre-placement meeting Practice Educators and/or on-site supervisors should identify the learning opportunities available in the placement under each of the Key Roles

The following is a specimen list of potential learning opportunities, which may or may not be

available in a specific placement. It is offered to assist Practice Educators in identifying possibilities.

• Direct work with service users

• Interviews; group work; meetings

• Care tasks in residential/day care settings

• Range of cases to incorporate diversity (gender, culture, race, disability, age, etc)

• Office duty • Written work • Agency records • Assessments • Formal reports • Project reports • Questionnaires • Log books • Incident reports

• Key worker reviews

• Visits of observation

• Observation of experienced practitioners

• Study of policy and practice guidelines

• Practice in staff meetings

• Case conferences or multi-disciplinary meetings

• Public meetings

• Working with administrative and secretarial staff

• Keeping a diary

• Supervision discussion

• Analysis of direct evidence: tapes, videos, live supervision

• Role plays/simulations

• Analysis of written work

• Reading

(22)

METHODS FOR OBTAINING EVIDENCE FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF COMPETENCE

Direct and indirect evidence for the assessment of competence in relation to Key Roles 4-6 must be clearly stated in the reports and linked to actual examples of practice. It is not sufficient to simply say that the student has achieved competence.

There are a number of ways in which students can obtain evidence, some of which will depend on the particular setting of the placement. As a general guide, there should be a variety of methods, one of which must be direct observation of a student’s practice. Three Direct Observations are required for each placement. Two of the three observations must be undertaken by the

Practice Educator. At least one should take place before the Mid-Placement Review, if possible. It is the joint responsibility of both student and Practice Educator to ensure that these and all evidence of practice are provided

Methods which may be used: DIRECT

OBSERVATION: This could be sitting in on interviews; observation at meetings; joint individual/group work; audio or video recordings. In residential and day care settings there are numerous opportunities for direct observation. Two of the direct observations should be with service users or carers. The other one may be with colleagues.

WRITTEN RECORDS: Included here are case notes; reports for a range of purposes; write up of special projects; application for service/resources, supervision notes. Practice Educators will be expected to check that a student is recording to the required standard of the placement agency and the university. NB: Off-site Practice Educators are bound by the confidentiality requirements of the placement agency and the university and as such should be allowed access to agency records written by their student. SUPERVISION: At regular supervision meetings, discussion of ongoing work; planning;

assessment skills; theoretical understandings; racist and

anti-discriminatory strategies; interviewing and communication; working with colleagues and other professionals, all form part of the supervision agenda and all are sources of evidence.

FEEDBACK FROM

AGENCIES: Service users; colleagues; managers; other agencies.

WRITTEN MATERIAL: In all placements and particularly in those where little formal agency recording takes place, students will be required to keep some written account of their work to demonstrate competence in their developing ability to reflect on their work. These may include diary or log books, or accounts of: groups; interviews; tasks undertaken. They will be negotiated with Practice Educator and tutor at the pre-placement meeting.

STUDENT’S

REFLECTIVE LOG: Practice Educators should encourage all students to keep a reflective log. The purpose of this log is to enable students to reflect on their practice, their development and the agency in which they are placed. Student should bring this log to supervision with them and share their relevant areas of reflection with the Practice Educator. NB: REFERENCE TO THE USE OF THE LOG AND PARTICULAR ASPECTS OF IT MAY BE USED AS EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD OF EVIDENCE AND PE’s REPORT BUT STUDENTS SHOULD NOT INCLUDE THE LOG AS PART OF THE PORTFOLIO

(23)

There may be other methods which lend themselves to gathering evidence within your own setting, such as role play/simulation, offering evidence, about the methods, their use and purpose. Whatever methods are used, it is important to be open with your student and with others involved in the assessment process.

(24)

Knowledge Base

The knowledge base of the Programme includes the following components, which should be met through the natural course of the programme and will be evidenced in the students’ practice, placement portfolio and academic work.

1. A broad understanding of the economic, social, demographic, cultural, religious, linguistic, environmental and political factors and their implications for social work practice.

2. Introduction to processes and structure of various providers of social work and social welfare, their history and development.

3. Social work theories, models and strategies.

4. Sources and forms of oppression, disadvantage and discrimination at individual and structural levels and recognition of a range of diverse lifestyles.

5. Effective communication components with a broad range of people, and theories of professional power.

6. Theories of networking, collaborative and cross boundary working and organisational theory. 7. Concepts of empowerment, partnership, advocacy and human and civil rights.

8. Legislation - principles and provisions, guidance documents and research findings. 9. Theories and practice of assessment, planning, evaluation and review.

10. Study of behaviour, relationships, effects of disadvantage, developmental stages and impact of society, trauma and abuse.

11. Concepts of choice, the contract culture, resourcing, monitoring, models and methods of needs led approaches and reviewing residential care programmes.

12. Concepts and indicators of risk, rights and investigative procedures. 13. Affirmation of cultural identity and self-worth.

14. Maintenance of personal and professional boundaries, handling aggression and managing disengagement.

15. Recognition and management of resource deficiencies.

16. Use of management skills and recognition of prioritisation, team and agency remit. 17. Use of management information systems.

18. Development of skills for reflective practice and critical analysis and ability to transfer knowledge.

19. Use of supervision, identification of learning styles and developmental needs. 20. Ethical issues and dilemmas in practice and potential for conflict.

(25)

SECTION 3

Assessment Requirements

Portfolio Contents

(26)
(27)

THE REQUIREMENTS OF STUDENTS IN ASSESSED PRACTICE PLACEMENTS FOR FINAL PLACEMENT By the end of their final placement students are expected to have provided evidence for the

following Key Roles and elements of the HCPC Guidance on Conduct and Ethics for Students that are relevant to placement:

Key Roles (National Occupational Standards – NOS)

Key Role 4: Manage risk to individuals, families, carers, groups, communities, self and colleagues

Key Role 5: Manage and be accountable, with supervision and support, for your own social work practice within your organisation

Key Role 6: Demonstrate professional competence in social work practice

HCPC Guidance on Conduct and Ethics for Students

There are 13 elements to the standards. Students should provide evidence for the following 10 elements:

1. You should always act in the best interests of your service users 2. You should respect the confidentiality of your service users 3. You should keep high standards of personal conduct

6. You should keep your professional knowledge and skills up to date 7. You should act within the limits of your knowledge and skills

8. You should communicate effectively with service users and your education provider and placement providers

9. You should get informed consent to provide care or services (as far as possible) 10. You should keep accurate records on service users

12. You should behave honestly

13. You should make sure that your behaviour does not damage public confidence in your profession

ANTI-RACIST AND ANTI-DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICE

Working in anti-racist and anti-discriminatory ways is an important element of social work. It is not a ‘method’ which students adopt only in working with, for example, black or disabled service users, but a way of thinking and acting which permeates practice. It is an attitude which always takes account of the complex ways in which oppression and inequality are mediated through structures of class, gender and ‘race’and their impact on people's lived experiences of age, sexual orientation and disability. The fact that an agency does not have black service users or workers for example, does not mean there is no opportunity for the student to work in ways which address ‘race’ and racism, and to develop anti-racist practice.

This approach takes students beyond the values of "being non-judgmental" and "accepting". It requires them to be prepared to question and challenge discriminatory policies and practices of institutions, agencies and individuals, and to foster strategies which will contribute to change.

(28)

Although anti-discriminatory practice is not identified as one of the core elements of the HCPC Guidance on Conduct and Ethics for Students, evidence of progress in anti-discriminatory practice is required in order for a student to pass a placement.

Students should provide evidence for the GC&ES of how they have addressed values across a range of areas, e.g. race, gender, disability, age and sexuality. This means that students should be

commenting on their ability to perceive what is discrete to particular areas of oppression and what is common across certain areas.

This does not mean that all these areas should be evidenced under each requirement but that there should be a spread of evidence across the GC&ES. Where the student has been unable to address particular areas of oppression and discrimination directly in their practice they should have been encouraged to think about these areas in supervision through discussion of policies and procedures, simulations and use of theoretical material.

(29)

PLACEMENT PORTFOLIO

Students on Placement 2 will compile a Portfolio of Evidence to demonstrate their competence against Key Roles 4, 5 and 6 and the 10 identified standards from the HCPC Guidance on Conduct and Ethics for Students (see appendix 2). Practice Educators will be expected to read this portfolio and verify the veracity of this work.

After preparation of the portfolio the following process should be implemented:

• Portfolio is given to the Practice Educator on the date agreed (after 90 days of placement)

• Practice Educator reads, verifies and assesses the work and evidence in the portfolio

• Practice Educator should sign each page of the Record of Evidence (see appendix 2)

• Practice Educator prepares their assessment report on the student. This is included in the portfolio. NB: THIS REPORT MUST BE SEEN BY THE STUDENT AND SIGNED BY BOTH STUDENT AND PRACTICE EDUCATOR.

• The student should submit the portfolio to the Student Hub Office on the 100th day of

placement or the day after. The student should keep a copy of the portfolio for themselves.

PORTFOLIO CONTENTS AND STRUCTURE 1. Front sheet Checklist (see appendix 1) 2. Placement Agreement Form

3. Mid-Point Review form

4. A brief outline of the placement agency 5. Completed Record of Evidence (appendix 2). 6. Organisational Analysis

7. Reflective Practice Analysis 8. Case Study

9. 3 x Direct Observation Reports

10.Practice Educator’s report, including Pass/Fail recommendation 11.Record of Supervision (Appendix 8)

12.Statement of confidentiality (see appendix 6) 13.Placement Attendance Sheet (appendix 9)

14.Receipt/acknowledgement regarding completion of placement evaluation form.

(30)

GUIDELINES FOR COMPLETION OF PORTFOLIO

Ensure all sections are included and verified on the Front Sheet Checklist (Appendix I).

NB: Service users’ written permission should be obtained for inclusion in the portfolio. This should be held by the Practice Educator and not be included in the portfolio.

ALL CONTENTS IN THE PORTFOLIO MUST BE ANONYMISED. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY BE IN BREACH OF THE DATA PROTECTION ACT 1998 AND COULD BE SEEN AS UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT WHICH MAY LEAD TO FURTHER ACTION. PORTFOLIOS NOT SUITABLY ANONYMISED WILL BE SENT BACK TO THE STUDENT FOR AMENDMENT WITHOUT BEING MARKED.

Guidelines for anonymisation

All portfolio evidence MUST be anonymised to ensure the confidentiality of service users, carers, practitioners, agencies (including placement agency), a person’s place of origin and other

detailed information from case profiles. Students will name the Placement Agency on the portfolio frontsheet and it is named on the Practice Learning Agreement and Mid Point Review. The name of the placement agency should not occur anywhere else in the portfolio. Wherever possible this should be done electronically, using the find and replace tools available in most word-processing software.

Alternatively, candidates should obliterate clients’ names, addresses and other identifying details with tippex. Where this method is used, only photocopies of the original document should be included in the portfolio.

WHERE EVIDENCE IS INCLUDED THAT IDENTIFIES THIRD PARTIES, E.G. OTHER PROFESSIONALS, OR AN AGENCY/ESTABLISHMENT, THERE SHOULD BE WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THOSE INDIVIDUALS OR ESTABLISHMENTS/AGENCIES CONCERNED THAT ANONYMISATION IS NOT REQUIRED.

The Practice Educator MUST state in their supporting report that they are satisfied that the portfolio has been anonymised satisfactorily, and that it may be viewed for assessment. Where a PE is off-site, then they must validate that the on-site supervisor has agreed that the portfolio has been anonymised satisfactorily.

Students should note that breaches in confidentiality may result in their portfolio being deemed to have ‘not met the requirements’. Where a breach is considered to be minor and this is the only area of the portfolio deemed unsatisfactory the candidate will be asked to amend the portfolio immediately. Where there are major breaches of confidentially which would involve a service user’s identity or residence being revealed, the portfolio may be referred back for further work and may need to be resubmitted at a future panel.

ALL FORMS MUST BE SIGNED WITH THE RELEVANT SIGNATURES. FAILURE TO OBTAIN SIGNATURES WILL MEAN THAT AN ASSESSMENT DECISION CAN NOT BE MADE BY THE PRACTICE ASSESSMENT PANEL.

(31)

Brief outline of placement agency

Students should provide a brief outline of the placement agency, which should include: Type of service

Whether it is voluntary, statutory or private organisation Service user group/s

Record of Evidence

The Record of Evidence (RoE) (see Appendix 2) is a working document which should be used by the student to identify evidence for all the Units and Elements of Key Roles 4, 5 and 6 and the required standards of the HCPC Guidance on Conduct and Ethics for Students. This evidence should come from the range of work undertaken in the placement and should be agreed with, and signed by, the

Practice Educator. Work included in the portfolio can be used as evidence but further additional placement work should be provided as evidence. The Record of Evidence includes a section at the beginning where the student must complete a brief outline of the work undertaken on placement /case summaries. The RoE MUST be completed by the student (not the Practice Educator) and signed by the Practice Educator on each page.

PLEASE NOTE: In identifying evidence in the Record of Evidence, students should be aware that they are not addressing a particular element in isolation, but with reference to the wider unit and key role under which that element is written. In other words evidence should be presented in a way that is integrated to the element, relevant unit and relevant key role. Evidence should not only be descriptive but should explain how and why the particular example meets

competence for this element.

There should be a minimum of one piece of evidence for each of the elements and these should be clear and specific in relation to how they meet the element. Examples of how this evidence should be recorded are:

Key Role 4

Manage risk to individuals, families, carers, groups, self and colleagues

Unit 12:

Assess and manage risks to individuals, families, carers, groups and communities

12.1 Identify and assess the nature of the risk

Upon beginning my work with D, a service users who has a history of severe depression as well as mobility issues brought on by chronic back pain, it was necessary for me to carry out, as part of the assessment process, a risk assessment. In doing this it was necessary for me to work together with D to identify the risks D poses to himself in terms of suicide, self harm and self neglect, and to other people in terms of abuse, child protection issues and the community as a whole. All of these issues were given a scale of low, medium or high, depending on how D and I perceived these as well as taking into account D’s history of risk.

(32)

Key Role 4

Manage risk to individuals, families, carers, groups, self and colleagues

Unit 13:

Assess, minimise and manage risk to self and colleagues 13.1 Assess potential risk to self and colleagues

When working with N, a service user who has in the past disclosed thoughts of a sexual and violent nature towards professionals who have been working with him, it was first of all necessary for me to make myself aware of all aspects of risk relating to N and his illness. To identify this risk I discussed these issues with N’s key worker and other members of the team as well as workers from other mental health teams. As well as discussing risk with other colleagues as N and I built up a working relationship we were able to discuss some of these risks openly. From this process I was able to identify that risks may become more prominent at times when N is particularly unwell in terms of his mental health, and should N’s mental health deteriorate, or should he lose contact with the service for a number of days, it was decided that both myself and other female workers would not enter into a situation whereby they would be alone with N.

Key Role 5

Manage and be accountable, with supervision and support, for your own social work

practice within your organisation

UNITS ELEMENTS EVIDENCE

Unit 14: Manage and be accountable for your own work

14.4 Use professional

and managerial supervision and support to improve your practice

Whilst on placement I have conducted a piece of research that looks at the lack of self-advocacy services for people with profound and multiple learning disabilities. I have arranged a series of bullying workshops and a bullying conference.

I have been involved in a range of different meetings e.g. Partnership Board, Modernising Services Sub-Group, Improving Health Group.

I have been involved in a range of training events e.g. Person Centred Planning, Training for Trainers.

I have been involved in developing the agency’s services which has involved numerous meetings with commissioners, financial advisers, Primary Care Trusts and many more people.

All the above has required me to prioritise my workload and I often had to stop one piece of work to start another which had a higher priority. For example when the Bullying Workshops and Conference were taking place all my time was spent organising those as that was what was most important at the time. However, when prioritising work I have been careful not to forget about other pieces of work.

Key Role 6

Demonstrate professional competence in social work practice

Unit 18:

Research, analyse, evaluate and use current knowledge of best social work practice

18.2 Use professional and organisational supervision and support to research, critically analyse and review knowledge based practice.

Throughout my work with D, it has been necessary for me to use supervisions as a way of both obtaining knowledge and reflecting on how my work is progressing. When I began working with D using a solution focussed approach I was quite unaware of the processes involved and how this approach might benefit D. In supervision I was able to discuss what I had researched, in terms of a solution focussed approach as well discussing other methods/models that might be used in practice. At one point in my work with D whilst working around him getting out of the house, something he found very difficult, it became evident that D suffered from panic attacks. In supervision suggestions were discussed about how work around anxiety could benefit D. As a result D and I began to discuss how his anxiety made him feel and what he thought were the triggers. We also discussed how anxiety works and why it triggers panic attacks.

(33)

There must be one piece of evidence for each of the required 10 standards of the Guidance on Conduct and Ethics for Students. Examples of how this evidence should be recorded are:

EVIDENCE

3. You should respect

the confidentiality of your service users

I worked within the agency’s information management policies and maintained confidentiality. Advised service users at the start of appointments of agency’s policies and procedures. Within drop-in work I have summarised information and made this clear to service users by providing them with photocopied information or written bullet points. I have worked to build trust with service users by honouring work commitments

6. You should keep

your professional knowledge and skills up to date

I realised that I did not have detailed enough understanding of legislation relating to asylum seekers and was concerned that this may prevent me from providing the most appropriate guidance and support. Through ringing a number of specialist agencies I was able to identify 2 training events that I thought would be useful. I discussed these with my Practice Educator and we agreed I should attend one of these. I attended and gained a thorough understanding of legislation that I subsequently applied to my practice with service users.

N.B. ALL EVIDENCE SHOULD BE DISCUSSED WITH THE PRACTICE EDUCATOR AND VERIFIED AS ACCURATE AND THE WORK OF THE STUDENT. THE RECORD OF EVIDENCE SHOULD BE SIGNED BY THE PRACTICE EDUCATOR AT THE END OF EACH PAGE.

(34)

BA3 : Placement Related Assignments

The following is offered as a guide for students in relation to writing about practice.

Writing about Practice

As part of this year’s assessment tasks you will be required to write about your own practice. This is a particular skill which requires balancing the detail of your work against theoretical

considerations. Writing about practice should always be reflective in tone. The following tips should help you write critically and reflectively about your own work:

• Reflective writing should always be in the first person (use “I”) and should concentrate on the actions of the writer

• You should start with case summary information

• Your assignment should set out clearly what was done (description), how it was done (detail), why it was done in that way (theoretical considerations) and what has been learnt (reflection on action)

• Make sure that you write about the practice in a chronological order

• It should consider issues of professional power, diversity and difference

• It should be respectful of the service-users confidentiality

• Ensure that the Agency also remains confidential and is referred to in broad terms (e.g. A local authority disability team, a small voluntary organisation working with survivors of domestic violence)

• It should be formal in tone (for example do not refer to female service-users as “Mum” – this is disrespectful in that it reduces the service-user to a relationship and is too informal)

• This is an opportunity to show how theory and practice are related, ensure that you use theoretical texts to support your discussion

• Usual Harvard referencing procedures apply

Brown and Rutter (2006: 25) suggest the following framework for improving reflective writing: Description Critical analysis Evaluation Learning

What did you do? What happened? How did you feel?

How did you do it? Why did you do it that way?

Why did you not do it a different way?

How far and in what ways were your goals met?

What other factors were apparent?

So, what does this mean for future practice and your values?

(35)

Placement Related Assignments

Organisational Analysis

2,000 words

You must provide an analysis of the agency in which you are undertaking your placement. This will include a brief description and will address:

• The agency’s philosophy, aims, objectives and policies

• How legislation and government policy defines the role and responsibilities of the organisation and the impact these have on practice

• Other organisations involved with the placement agency including structures for inter and multi-disciplinary working and issues that arise from this

• How well does the agency address service users’ needs relating to diversity This analysis should also address Key Role 5

Manage and be accountable, with supervision and support, for your own social work practice within your organisation.

This will include demonstrating how you have:

• Managed and been accountable with supervision and support, for your own social work practice within the organisation

• Contributed to the management of resources and services

• Managed, presented and shared records and reports

• Worked within multi-disciplinary and multi-organisational teams, networks and systems

Students should also demonstrate their ability to reflect on the agency’s policies, procedures and practices (particularly in relation to power and oppression), underpin this reflection with theory, and reference the theory suitably. Assignments where there is considered to be insufficient evidence of understanding of relevant theory and reflection will be deemed not to have met requirements. There should be a reference list/bibliography for this piece of work.

This piece of work should also provide evidence of how the student has worked to the HCPC Guidance on Conduct and Ethics for Students.

This assignment is not submitted at University, and will not be awarded an academic mark. It will be assessed by your Practice Educator and Tutor, who will determine whether or not it meets the assessment criteria, and it will form part of your portfolio of evidence for your final placement. You will agree a submission date for this assignment at the Placement Agreement Meeting.

As with all assignments, you must refer to the assessment criteria and level indicators whilst completing this assignment. You must also ensure that the assignment is academically referenced using the Harvard system for referencing.

(36)

Placement Related Assignment

Reflective Practice Analysis :

2,500 words

In this piece of work you will reflect upon your professional development during the placement. To do this you should critically analyse an event which has impacted substantially on the development of your practice, showing your understanding of the ethical issues, dilemmas and tensions which existed. You should also say how your ability to reflect on the above has influenced your future professional practice and growth. This will include demonstrating how you have:

• Researched, analysed, evaluated and used current knowledge of best social work practice.

• Worked within agreed standards of social work practice and ensured own professional development

• Contributed to the promotion of best social work practice

• Critically reflected on your practice in relation to the event.

Further guidance:

This assignment should enable students to provide evidence towards Key Role 6 – Demonstrate professional competence in social work practice

This assignment is not submitted at University, and will not be awarded an academic mark. It will be assessed by your Practice Educator and Tutor, who will determine whether or not it meets the assessment criteria, and it will form part of your portfolio of evidence for your final placement. You will agreea submission date for this assignment at the Placement Agreement Meeting.

As with all assignments, you must refer to the assessment criteria and level indicators whilst completing this assignment. You must also ensure that the assignment is academically referenced using the Harvard system for referencing.

(37)

Placement Related Assignment

Case Study:

1,500 words

The case study must be based on work undertaken during the placement. The student should consider the following questions:-.

• Brief indication of what the piece of work demonstrates and why it has been chosen for inclusion in the portfolio

• Summary of previous history of social work intervention concerning the service user(s) in question, including the initial aims and objectives

• Evaluation of the planning for, process, and outcome of the work undertaken with reference to:

• Legislative and policy context

• Theoretical perspectives, knowledge and research

• Values, principles and ethics

• Methods of work and why these were chosen

• Outcomes of work and evaluation of the extent to which it has promoted anti-discriminatory practice

• Service user or carer perspective and how this contributed to learning

• Evaluation of own practice learning and how this has contributed to meeting the National Occupational Standards

This assignment is not submitted at University, and will not be awarded an academic mark. It will be assessed by your Practice Educator and Tutor, who will determine whether or not it meets the assessment criteria, and it will form part of your portfolio of evidence for your final placement. You will agree a submission date for this assignment at the Placement Agreement Meeting.

As with all assignments, you must refer to the assessment criteria and level indicators whilst completing this assignment. You must also ensure that the assignment is academically referenced using the Harvard system for referencing.

(38)

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

The purpose of assessment at Level III is for you to build on skills gained at Level II and to develop a more critical analysis of the issues discussed. The following criteria will form the basis of the assessment of all the assignments:

- Compare alternative theories and interpretations consistently. - Critically evaluate different approaches to learning.

- Apply critical evaluation to practice.

- Use literature, including relevant professional and academic journals to inform analysis and explanation.

- Give evidence of an understanding of, and commitment to, discriminatory and anti-oppressive policy and practice.

(39)

Level Indicators Undergraduate

Grade

Level 6

90-100%

1

st

Pass

A piece of work that is of the highest standard that could be achieved

at this level (or above). The work meets all necessary learning

outcomes and is likely to be presented in a unique style. The work

shows a consistent systematic understanding of the area under

investigation and there is evidence of coherent and detailed

knowledge, at least some of which is at, or informed by, the

forefront of the discipline. Arguments are clearly devised, sustained

and defended. There is clear critical interpretation of a broad range

of relevant literature (and where appropriate research). The ability

to summarise is evident and inclusions/exclusions of material are

justified. Referencing is accurate.

80-89%

1

st

Pass

A piece of work that is of a consistently high standard for this level.

The work meets all necessary learning outcomes and may be

presented in an original style. The work shows a systematic

understanding of the area under investigation and there is evidence

of coherent and detailed knowledge, at least some of which is at, or

informed by, the forefront of the discipline. Arguments are clearly

devised, sustained and defended. There is clear critical

interpretation of a broad range of relevant literature (and where

appropriate) research. The ability to summarise is evident.

Referencing is invariably accurate.

70-79%

1

st

Pass

A piece of work that is of a high standard for this level. The work

meets all necessary learning outcomes and shows a systematic

understanding of the area under investigation and there is evidence

of coherent and detailed knowledge, at least some of which is at, or

informed by, the forefront of the discipline. Arguments are clearly

devised, sustained and defended. There is clear critical

interpretation of a broad range of relevant literature (and where

appropriate research). Referencing is invariably accurate.

60-69%

2:1

Pass

A piece of work that addresses the assessment guidelines in full and

shows a systematic and critical understanding of the area under

investigation though there may be some small gaps. Arguments are

usually clearly devised and sustained though there may be some

cracks. There is clear critical interpretation of a broad range of

relevant literature (and where appropriate research). Referencing is

invariably accurate.

50-59%

2:2

Pass

A piece of work that addresses the assessment guidelines though

there may be some gaps. There is usually a systematic and critical

understanding of the area under investigation though some areas may

be less well defined. The work may tend toward regurgitation of

taught input, interpretation of a good range of relevant literature

(and where appropriate research) exists though this may tend toward

description. Additional reading may be required. Referencing is

usually accurate though may require some review.

(40)

40-49%

3

rd

Pass

A piece of work that achieves all the learning outcomes and

addresses the main parts of the assessment guidelines though there

are likely to be knowledge gaps which occasionally question the

student’s full understanding of key aspects. Where they appear,

arguments are usually clearly sustained. A reasonable range of

relevant literature (and where appropriate research) is provided

though additional reading may be advised. Referencing is reasonable

though may require review.

35-39%

Marginal

Fail

A piece of work that achieves most, but not all, learning outcomes at

threshold level and therefore does not meet the assessment

guidelines. It may be disorganised to the extent that interpretation is

difficult. The supporting literature is likely to be limited and

further/wider reading is required. Referencing may require further

work. Academic writing may be a problem.

30-34%

Fail

A piece of work that does not meet the learning outcomes or

assessment guidelines and/or is disorganised to the extent that

interpretation is difficult. The supporting literature is likely to be

limited and further/wider reading is required. Referencing may

require further work. Academic writing may be a problem.

20-29%

Fail

As per 30-34% though there are likely to be major misconceptions /

errors.

0-19%

Fail

As per 20-29% with the likelihood that this work is incomplete or the

student has misread the assessment guidelines.

(41)

PRACTICE EDUCATOR’S REPORT (see pro-forma Appendix 7)

This report should be completed by the time the student has finished their 100-days in placement. It should be discussed and read by the student and both the Practice Educator and student must sign the report.

TO INCLUDE:

1. Confirmation /validation of student’s evidence.

The confirmation/validation of the student’s evidence is a statement verifying the accuracy of the student’s portfolio contents, and that they had obtained authorisation from the service user(s) referred to in their portfolio.

2. Summary of evidence under the 3 Key Roles 4-6 (1,500 words – suggested).

For each of the three Key Roles provide a summary of evidence as to how well the student has met that particular competence. It is helpful if units and elements could be indicated as well. Cross referencing with the student’s contribution is possible, although additional information, for example expanding on a piece of observed work, would be preferred. Evidence can be used from the student’s practice other than that in the portfolio; this will give a more rounded view of the student’s practice on placement. Practice Educators should comment on the evidence in the three pieces of written work. Practice Educators therefore need to ensure that they have been given these to read by the student.

3. Statement indicating how the student has demonstrated the standards of the HCPC Guidance on Conduct and Ethics for Students (1,500 words – suggested).

Evidence as to how the student has met the HCPC GC&ES must be given. Again, cross referencing is possible but additional evidence over and above what the student has provided will give further validity to the portfolio.

4. Overview/general comments on student performance (250 words – suggested). This should be a summary/overview of the overall performance of the student. 5. Future learning needs of student (250 words - suggested).

Areas of further development for the student should be highlighted, for example experience of more complex/multi-agency cases; group work skills; legislative knowledge; awareness of particular cultural issues that were relevant on placement.

6. Pass/Fail recommendation – the report must conclude with a clear recommendation of either PASS or FAIL

PLEASE CAN PRACTICE EDUCATORS EMAIL A COPY (IN PDF FORMAT IF POSSIBLE) FROM THEIR EMAIL ADDRESS TO [email protected] WITH THE SUBJECT HEADING OF THE STUDENT NAME AND THE WORDS PRACTICE EDUCATOR REPORT AS SOON AS THE PLACEMENT IS COMPLETED.

(42)
(43)

SECTION 4

Practice Assessment Panel

Procedures For Dealing With Problems

Policies Relating To Placements/Students

(44)
(45)

THE PROGRAMME PRACTICE ASSESSMENT PANEL The Practice Assessment Panel (PAP)

The PAP consists of experienced practitioners and tutors who monitor all aspects of practice learning. The PAP will make recommendations to the Programme Examination Board, which makes final decisions about students' progression through the Programme.

Composition of the Practice Assessment Panel (PAP) The Practice Assessment Panel shall comprise:

(a) Representatives of the University Social Work Staff

(b) Representatives nominated by agencies’ member of the Programme Stakeholders Duties of the Practice Assessment Panel

The PAP shall be responsible to the Programme Examination Board for:

(a) co-ordinating, monitoring and developing practice assessment standards

(b) collating information on practice learning for the Programme Examination Board (c) implementing the procedures for termination of placement and second opinions (d) receiving written reports in relation to placement terminations and second opinions

(f) making Pass or Fail recommendations to the Programme Examination Board relating to each student on completion of their placement

(g) identifying the training needs of Practice Educator

(h) Identifying areas of development for the Programme in relation to practice learning and practice related matters.

References

Related documents

In addition, if I marked "Yes" to any of the above questions, I hereby authorize release of information from my Department of Transportation regulated drug and alcohol

Single scale model-based obstacle detection framework presents a viable basis for im- plementing complete embedded obstacle detection systems, depending on the environment

Public institutions, government and courts are generally now accepting responsibility for publishing their primary legal materials and providing court assigned citations rather than

We tested whether the SGI and SGII CRISPR spacer sequences had homologues in the NCBI NR database, and found many homologous to streptococcal viruses, genomes, and plasmids in

He goes through the transformations of colour from brown to rose, from rose to orange, from orange to mercurial green, to golden yellow and finally to blue, the synthesis

For advanced debugging, consider using the Intel software tools, specifically, the Intel Debugger, the Intel Thread Checker, and the Intel Thread Profiler. The book

The purpose of this study was to determine specific communication accommodations used by county agricultural and natural resource agents/educators when discussing complex, scientific

Like other parts of the world requirement engineering practitioners of the local software industry have also experienced social, cultural, political and cognitive