• No results found

MULTIPOINT VIDEO CALLING

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "MULTIPOINT VIDEO CALLING"

Copied!
13
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Share This Ebook!

www.telemerge.ca

(2)

Share This Ebook!

VIDEO CONFERENCING

MADE

SIMPLE.

TELEMERGE’S ALL-IN-ONE

VIDEO COLLABORATION

Everything you need to enable adoption, right here.

THE FOUR PILLARS

Request A Demo

Learn More

Telemerge Support Real time help when you need it

Telemerge Cloud Offering

Simplified device scheduling Complete Bridging capabilities

Connect to any device

Proper Equipment Recommendations

Easy to use solution that works every time

Global Network Offering & Guidance

(3)

Share This Ebook!

www.telemerge.ca

CONTENTS

.

Features to support multipoint calling

Voice activated switching vs. continuous

presence layout vs. lecturer mode

04

Transcoding of video and audio codecs

05

Content Sharing modes

06

Gateway service

07

Firewall Traversal

08

Spam and Fraud prevention

09

Explore and compare alternative

deployment architectures

Embedded video bridging

10

Stand-alone video bridging

11

Cloud-based multipoint bridging

12

Share This Ebook!

(4)

Share This Ebook!

VIDEO IS THE NEW VOICE

With increasing adoption of videoconferencing, SMBs and enterprises are actively

looking to provide their workforce with adequate and cost effective options for

multipoint video calling. While some organizations are satisfied with basic

multi-point video calling many others are looking for a solution which will take care of

transcoding and interoperability in secure multi vendor environments.

In order to support multipoint videoconferencing a bridge of some sort is needed. But before we discuss the differences between conferences hosted “in the cloud”, using on-premise multipoint control units or the use of multisite and mulitpoint options embedded in some videoconferenc-ing endpoints, let’s understand the basics involved in multipoint videoconferencvideoconferenc-ing.

Features To Be Supported In Multipoint Calling

When company is looking for a multipoint bridging solution it has to decide first on which use cases have to be supported. There are several very useful features that are must haves in the

current videoconferencing realm:

• Voice activated switching versus continuous presence layouts versus lecturer mode • Transcoding of different video and audio codecs

• Presentation or content sharing mode • Gateway switching service

• Software bridge based on H.264 Scalable Video Coding (SVC) protocol • Firewall traversal capabilities that enable endpoints to participate

in the same videoconference no matter where they come from i.e. private or public networks

(5)

Share This Ebook!

www.telemerge.ca

Voice Activated Switching Vs. Continuous

Presence Layouts Versus Lecturer Mode

Based on its use cases, a company can chose to have its multipoint bridging ser-vice support either voice activated or continuous presence layouts. In the voice activated switching mode all participants see the video image of the current speaker. The speaker sees the video image of the previous speaker. When a new speaker begins talking, the video switches to the new speaker.

In the continuous presence mode the multipoint bridge creates a picture con-sisting of the video from multiple sites participating in the conference. This fea-ture allows participants to see up to 16 or even more sites at one time.

In the lecturer mode one location’s video, audio and data are viewed by all the other endpoints. The lecturer views the other locations one after another for a fixed duration of time.

Transcoding of Different Video and Audio Codecs

Over the last few years, the number of video and audio codec standards in the market has grown significantly. Different endpoints can use a variety of video and audio codecs to encode and decode their video and audio streams. When various endpoints using different codecs engage in a video collaboration session there is a need for transcoding between them. Without transcoding capabilities these endpoints will not be able to communicate each with other. Generally the more sophisticated the multipoint system, the more successful it will be in allow-ing these disparate systems to connect. For example, an on-premise or cloud-based MCU will be best able to handle transcoding

duties, whereas a multisite or multipoint function embedded in a video endpoint is limited in the way it supports transcoding.

(6)

Share This Ebook!

Presentation or Content Sharing Mode

Presentation or content sharing mode allows the speaker to share a presen-tation with the other endpoints. This feature is very important in today’s video communication world as it allows for more effective collaboration and helps to streamline many internal processes.

Gateway Service

A gateway service enables endpoints with varying protocols, networks and au-dio and video formats to communicate in the same conference. There are many different communication protocols, such as, H.323, SIP and H.320 (sometimes called a legacy protocol), and standards for video conferencing. As well, there can be different underlying networks supporting the traffic from video end-points that are connected into one video conference.

Historicaly video conferencing was first used and deployed over ISDN networks. After a while, video conferencing started to slowly migrate to TCP based net-works. However, the reality is that there are plenty of companies and endpoints that still leverage ISDN networks for their video communication.

There are some pros and cons for each network. Both H.323 and SIP use the more common TCP based networks, whereas H.320 uses ISDN based networks. Video endpoints located in these networks can’t communicate with each oth-er and require a special gateway for intoth-erconnection. In ordoth-er to support such interconnection, the company has to deploy a dedicated gateway in their core network or subscribe to such a service.

(7)

Share This Ebook!

www.telemerge.ca

Software Bridge Based on H.264 Scalable Video

Coding (SVC) Protocol

Software based bridges - or routers, that use H.264 Scalable Video Coding (SVC) protocol are drawing a lot of attention these days. A couple of the biggest ad-vantages of deploying H.264 SVC routers are lower cost hardware and higher resiliency against packet loss. While there are a number of pros and cons for using software bridging based on the H.264 SVC protocol, one of the main disad-vantages is that of the manufacturers that have chosen to implement H.264 SVC in their products, none of them can natively interoperate with each other. That stated, this solution can still provide some organizations with an adequate video quality and experience but has to be carefully tested and tried in their specific use cases and network.

Firewall Traversal Capabilities

A major problems with IP based videoconferencing relates to traversing the corporate firewall. Firewalls are designed to keep certain types of traffic out of a network and are usually deployed in strategic points in the network infrastruc-ture, primarily between the public Internet and the corporate network, between branch offices and the corporate network or even between segments of the cor-porate network. Neither H.323 nor SIP protocols were designed with security in mind and require a large number of ports to be opened in the corporate firewall in order to function properly. Since this presents a security risk that no security administrator will accept, some sort of firewall traversal solution must be used. This allows the organization to leverage video conferencing not only inside their local LAN but with other branches and third-party customers

that use the Internet for video collaboration. Unfortunately, multisite or multipoint capabilities embedded in video endpoints do not support firewall traversal.

(8)

Share This Ebook!

Prevention of SIP Spam and Toll Fraud Attacks

Video conferencing devices reside within a corporate infrastructure and typically rely on Internet protocol. The first question you should ask yourself is this: ‘Is my videoconferencing infrastructure exposed to a public Internet?’ If the answer is yes, and your infrastructure isn’t protected by a firewall, a spammer can drive a huge volume of SIP spam calls to you and relay their messages in real-time media. Multisite or multipoint capabilities embedded in video endpoints have no way to filter or block SIP spam and toll fraud attacks.

(9)

Share This Ebook!

www.telemerge.ca

Deployment Architectures

There are three options when it comes to deployment architectures for multi-point conferencing. Each has advantages and disadvantages so you’ll want to choose the one that right for your needs now as well as in the future.

1. EMBEDDED VIDEO BRIDGING

Embedded video bridges (a.k.a. multisite or multipoint option keys) are available as a software feature (often optional for an additional fee) within many video-conferencing endpoints.

Advantage:

Often the most cost-effective choice

Disadvantage:

Only basic functionality

• No transcoding of different video and audio codecs

• Limited number of participants (usually 4 or 6 with no support for

lecturer mode)

• Bandwidth requirements aggregate to increase demand on the organizer’s network

• No gateway service support

• Firewall traversal capabilities not supported

(10)

Share This Ebook!

Stand-alone video bridges involve the use of bridging platforms owned by the cus-tomer, and managed and hosted by either the customer or a service provider.

Advantage:

More than just basic functionality

Disadvantage:

Burden on resources

• High cost of ownership

• Significant burden on the organization’s IT department to manage and sup-port systems that are typically out of their scope of expertise

• Limited scalability, i.e. the organization can’t expand a limited bridge capacity to host many multipoint events and then shrink this capacity back to support their day-to-day activities

• Very limited firewall traversal capabilities

(11)

Share This Ebook!

www.telemerge.ca

Cloud-based multipoint bridging involves the use of bridging platforms owned, managed, and hosted by an external service provider.

Cloud-based video conferencing is usually procured on a subscription basis with-out the need to own and deploy hardware – with the commensurate savings in costs. It can also be designed to flexibly satisfy the customer’s unique use cases. The other advantage is a substantial reduction or even elimination of the nee for the organization to manage the service.

Advantages:

• Built in transcoding of different video and audio codecs • Full continuous presence support and lecturer mode support • Gateway service support

• Firewall traversal and TURN, STUN and ICE are all supported • Built in prevention of SIP spam and toll fraud attacks

• Easily scalable to match business needs

• Eliminates technology and operational risk of an in-house solution • Reduce support burden on IT resources

Disadvantage:

Not cost-effective for very large

deployments (typically more than 25 endpoints)

Clearly there is a lot to consider when evaluating a bridging

solu-tion for your organizasolu-tion not only for today’s requirements but

also for what the future could hold.

CAREFULLY CHOOSE THE RIGHT MULTIPOINT

BRIDGING CHOICE FOR YOUR BUSINESS AND

START REALIZING THE BENEFITS OF

(12)

Share This Ebook!

Telemerge offers all-in-one video collaboration

that is easy to use for everyone, anywhere, at

any time.

Regardless of the endpoint, people can connect via the cloud without the need for expensive video conferencing infrastructure , complicated configurations, or test runs. Communication at it’s simplest, where and when you need it.

interaction. As wonderful as electronic devices are, they can nev-er fully replace the intimacy and immediacy of people con vnev-ersing in the same room and it has worked for millions of years.”

Kathleen Begley, Ed.D., author of Face-to-Face Communication, Making Human Connections in a Technology-Driven World. “

(13)

Share This Ebook!

www.telemerge.ca

Share This Ebook!

www.telemerge.ca

BRING YOUR

MCU TO THE

CLOUD

Avoid the costly investment of an MCU and other infrastructure by leveraging

Telemerge’s video conferencing cloud. Talk to one of our video collaboration specialists today to receive a free consultation on how your organization can benefit from an All-in-One Video Collaboration Solution.

TALK TO US TODAY.

888.987.4156

References

Related documents

(Platz für Staaten, mit denen Erstreckungsabkommen am Anmeldetag der früheren Anmeldung in Kraft waren (Artikel 76 (1)) / (Space for states with which extension agreements existed

If using the TSCC codec for highlight video production results in file sizes that are too large for your purposes, we recommend using the Microsoft MPEG-4 v2 codec, which

The Vision 1000 Video Gateway can also support real-time video and voice transcoding, allowing service providers and mobile operators to deliver enhanced video quality and

Up to nine-way video calling Impromptu multipoint video calling bridge capable of a joining up to nine WebEx Telepresence video participants: WebEx Telepresence video

Offered as a hosted infrastructure-as-a-service, including multiway video conferencing bridges, firewall traversal, directory services, presence and bandwidth management,

1) Efficient, low cost infrastructure – this approach avoids the need for an expensive transcoding video bridge to support multipoint video calls. 2) Exceptional network resiliency

The VG Connect™ service includes bridging and gateway services with virtual video rooms, streaming, concierge services for full meeting support, and desktop and mobile video

VideoCloud Managed Conferencing Service (VC- MCS) provides cloud-based video conferencing bridging, call control, and management to support multipoint room video conferencing