• No results found

Detection and identification of mycobacteria by amplification of rRNA

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Detection and identification of mycobacteria by amplification of rRNA"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

0095-1137/90/081751-09$02.00/0

CopyrightC 1990, American Society for Microbiology

Detection and

Identification of Mycobacteria

by Amplification of rRNA

BORIS BODDINGHAUS,1 TILL ROGALL,' THOMAS FLOHR,' HELMUT BLOCKER,2 ANDERIKC. BOTTGERî*

Institutefur Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Medizinische HochschuleHannover, Konstanty-Gutschow-Strasse 8, D-3000

Hannover61,1 and Gesellschaft fur Biotechnologische Forschung, D-3300 Braunschweig,2 Federal Republic of Germany

Received 21 February 1990/Accepted 23 May 1990

Oligonucleotides specific at a genus, group, orspecies level were defined by a systematic comparison of

small-subunit rRNA sequencesfrom Mycobacteriumtuberculosis,M.bovis,M. africanum,M. bovisBCG,M.

avium,M.kansasii,M.marinum,M.gastri,M.chelonae,M.smegmatis,M.terrae,M.nonchromogenicum,M.

xenopi,M.malmoense,M.szulgai,M.scrofulaceum,M.fortuitum, M.gordonae,M. intracelulare,M.simiae,

M.flavescens,M.paratuberculosis,M. sphagni,M. cookii,M.komossense,M.phlei,and M.farcinica. On the

basis of the defined oligonucleotides, the polymerase chain reaction technique was explored to develop a

sensitivetaxon-specific detectionsystemfor mycobacteria. By usingM. tuberculosis asamodelsystem, fewer

than 10 bacteria could bereliably detected by this kind ofassay. Theseresults suggestthatamplification of rRNAsequencesby the polymerase chain reactionmayprovideahighly sensitive and specific toolfor the direct

detection of microorganisms withouttheneedfor prior cultivation. ThegenusMycobacterium consists ofa diverse groupof

acid-fast bacilli which includes a number of human and

animal pathogens (23). In addition to such overt human

pathogens as Mycobacterium tuberculosis and M. leprae,

there are a number of opportunistic pathogens (e.g., M.

avium, M. intracellulare, M. kansasii, M. simiae, and M.

szulgai) which cancause severe lung disease whenever the

normal cellular defenses have been temporarily depressed

(6). Furthermore, occasional clinical reports describe most

of the mycobacterial species defined so far as potential

pathogens (e.g., references 19 and 25). Despite progress in

biochemical, biological, and immunological techniques, the

reliable identification of mycobacteria remains aproblem.

Commonly, two approaches are used in clinical practice

for the diagnosis of mycobacterial infections. The direct

identification of acid-fast organisms by microscopy is rapid

but does not permit the identification of the mycobacterial

species observed and lacks sensitivity because large

num-bers oforganisms (>104/ml) mustbe present tobe reliably

detected(2). Culture, when positive, permits the subsequent

identification of the mycobacterial species investigated, but

the slowgrowth of mycobacteria in vitro entailsadelay of 3

to6 weeks.

Nucleic acid technology provides a radically different

approach and maybegin a new erain clinical microbiology

provided that itcanbe established in clinicallaboratories in

additiontothetraditionalserological, cultural, and

biochem-ical methods. Recently, amethod which permits the

ampli-fication ofspecific DNAsequencesand whichcanbe usedto

multiplyeven a single copyofagiven DNA sequence bya

factor of 1012 has been developed (21). This technique has

already been applied as an effective tool for bacteriological

diagnosis (13, 14, 18).

Severalreasonsmake rRNAsappealingtargetsfor

detec-tionassays based on nucleic acid structure. (i) rRNA is an

essential constituent of bacterial ribosomes (24). (ii)

Com-parative analysis of rRNAsequencesrevealssomestretches

ofhighly conserved sequences and others with a

consider-ableamountofvariability (24). (iii) rRNA ispresentinlarge

*Corresponding author.

copy numbers, i.e., 103 to 104 molecules per cell, thus

facilitating the development of sensitive detection assays

(11, 17, 20).(iv) The nucleotide sequenceof16S rRNAcan

rapidly be determined withoutanycloning procedures (3, 10,

16). The rRNA sequence is characteristic fornearly every

organism and has been used for establishing phylogenetic relationships (22, 24) as well as for identification of

micro-organisms (11, 12, 20).

Inthepresentstudy, the feasibility of using rRNA-derived

DNA probes to differentiate between highly related taxa

within the genus Mycobacterium was investigated. Our

results demonstrate that despite the high sequence

conser-vation of rRNA cistrons, such probes can be used to

differentiate between very closely related mycobacterial

species. We have developed asensitive andrapid technique

for the detection of mycobacteria which is based on the

amplification of nucleic acidsequencesfrom16S rRNA. The

subsequent identification of the amplified DNA fragment is

carried outby hybridization to oligonucleotides, the

speci-ficity of whichis definedatagenus, group, orspecieslevel.

MATERIALSANDMETHODS

Bacterialstrains.Table 1 lists the strains whose16SrRNA

sequences were determined for this study. The complete

sequences willbepublished elsewhere.

Extraction of nucleic acids. Culturesgrown on

Lowenstein-Jensen slants wereharvested and washed in 10mM Tris-i

mM EDTA(TE). The pelletwasdissolved in 10 mMTris-10

mM EDTA-0.1% Tween 80-2mg oflysozyme (Boehringer

GmbH, Mannheim, Federal Republic of Germany) ml-',

incubated for 2 hat37°C with shaking, and centrifuged. The

bacterial pelletwas lysed by redissolvingin TE containing

100 Ftg of proteinase K (Boehringer) ml-'-1% (wt/vol)

sodium dodecyl sulfate and incubated for 1 h at 37°C.

Nucleic acidswereextractedby adding anequal volumeof

TE-saturated phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1,

vol/vol/vol). The aqueousphase wastransferred toanother

tube and 0.1 volumes of cold 3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.2)

were added. Afterbeing mixed by inversion, samples were

placedonice for 10 min beforecentrifugationina

microcen-trifuge for 10min. The supernatant fluidwastransferredto

1751

on April 12, 2020 by guest

http://jcm.asm.org/

(2)

TABLE 1. Bacterialstrains used in this study

Species andstrains Source

M. tuberculosis

M. bovis... Institute for Medical

Microbi-ology, Hannover, Federal Republicof Germany M. bovis BCG

M. tuberculosis H37

M. aviumChester DSM 43216...DSM

M.gastriATCC 15754T...ATCC M. kansasii DSM 43224...DSM

M. marinum... K. Schroder,

Forschungsinsti-tutBorstel,Borstel,Federal Republic ofGermany M. africanum... K. Schroder

M. chelonae ATCC 14472...DSM

M. smegmatisATCC 14468...DSM

M. terrae ATCC15755T...DSM

M.gordonae ATCC14470T...ATCC

M.scrofulaceumATCC 19981T...ATCC

M.szulgaiATCC 2573T...ATCC

M. intracellulare ATCC 15985...DSM

M. nonchromogenicum

ATCC 19530T... ATCC

M.xenopiATCC 19250T...ATCC

M. malmoense ATCC29571T...ATCC

M. simiaeATCC25275T...ATCC

M.flavescens ATCC 14474T...ATCC

M.fortuitumATCC 6841T...ATCC

M.paratuberculosisATCC 19698...B.

J0rgensen,

National

Veter-inaryLaboratory, Copen-hagen, Denmark

M.sphagniATCC33027T...J. Kazda, Forschungsinstitut Borstel

M. cookii... J. Kazda

M. komossense ATCC33013T...J. Kazda

M.farcinicaDSM 43294...DSM M.phleiATCC 35784...J.Kazda

aATCC, American Type Culture Collection,Rockville, Md.; DSM,

Deut-scheStammsammlungfurMikroorganismen, Braunschweig, Federal Repub-lic ofGermany.Tindicatestypestrain.

another tube, andthenucleic acids wereprecipitated bythe

addition of20pg ofacrylamide

ml-',

0.05volumes of 3 M

sodiumacetate,and 2.5 volumes ofethanol,washed, dried, redissolved inH20orTE, and storedat-20°C. Concentra-tions of nucleic acids were determined spectrophotometri-cally at 260 nm and verified by judging the intensities of bands afterelectrophoresis on0.8%

(wt/vol)

agarose gels.

To produce specimens containing a known number of

mycobacteria, a culture of M. tuberculosis H37 was

ob-tained, and serial 10-fold dilutions were prepared from this culture.Samples ofthedilutionsweregrownon

Lowenstein-Jensenslantstodeterminethe number oforganismspresent.

Reverse transcription and amplification reaction. Nucleic

acidextractswereheatedfor 5 minat65°Cbefore rRNAwas

transcribed into cDNAin 20 ,ul of 50mMTris (pH 8.3)-30

mM KCI-8 mM MgCl2 containing 100 pmol of synthetic oligonucleotide primer, 10 Uof AMV reversetranscriptase

(Seikaguku,

Rockville, Md.),and 16 Uof RNasin(Promega Corp., Madison, Wis.) by incubationfor 1hat 37°C.

The amplification ofDNA sequences was performed as

described elsewhere (10). Briefly, the polymerase chain

reaction (PCR) was performed in a total volume of 100 pi

with 2.5 U of Taq polymerase (Perkin-Elmer Cetus,

Nor-walk, Conn., or GIBCO BRL, Gaithersburg,

Md.)-0.05%

detergent

W-1 (GIBCO

BRL)-50

mM KCI-10 mM Tris

hydrochloride(pH 8.3)-1.5 mM

MgCl2-0.01% (wt/vol)

gela-tin-100 pmol ofeach ofthetwo primers and 200 ,uM each

deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dATP,

dCTP, dGTP,

and

dTTP).

The

90-pul

mixture was covered

by

100

pul

of

light

mineral oil

(Perkin-Elmer Cetus).

DNA was

always

added last ina

10-puI

quantity whilethereaction mixturewaskeptat

70°C. BeforeDNAwas

added,

itwasincubatedfor 2 minat

95°Candfor15minatroomtemperature. Similarly, 10pulof

the reverse transcriptase reaction mixture was used in the

PCR. The thermalprofile involved36cyclesofdenaturation

at

93°C

for 1min, primer annealing at60or63°C for2

min,

andextension at 72°Cfor 6 min.

Oligonucleotides

were

synthesized

on aGene Assembler

Plus (Pharmacia) and purified with a shadow-casting

poly-acrylamide gel

(1).

Hybridization and analysis ofamplified samples.

Aliquots

of

amplified samples (10 pul)

were

electrophoresed

through

0.8% agarose gels, and the DNA was visualized by UV

fluorescence after itwas stained with ethidium bromide.

Forslot blotanalysis,

20-pul

aliquots of amplified

samples

ornucleic acids from each

organism

weredenatured bythe

addition of100pul of0.5 M NaOH-25 mM EDTA,incubated for30 minatroomtemperature, andneutralized with120

pul

of2 M ammonium acetate. The samples were loaded into

wells of a manifold (Minifold II; Schleicher & Schuell,

Dassel, Federal Republic of Germany) fitted witha

nitrocel-lulose membrane (BA 85; Schleicher & Schuell)

previously

wetted in 10x SSC (lx SSC is 0.15 MNaCl plus 0.015 M

sodium

citrate,

pH7.0). Each wellwasrinsed with 0.4 ml of

10x SSC, and the membranes were heatedfor 2 h at80°C.

Hybridization was performed by standard techniques (1).

The membraneswererinsedin 6x SSCandprehybridizedin

6x SSC-5x Denhardt solution (lx Denhardt solution is

0.02% Ficoll-0.02% polyvinylpyrrolidone-0.02% bovine se-rumalbumin)-0.1% sodiumdodecyl sulfate-100 ,ug of tRNA

(Boehringer) ml1 for 1 to 2 h at 50°C. Hybridization was

performedinthesamesolutioncontaining2 x 106to1 x

107

cpm of 5'-end-labeled oligonucleotide ml1 overnight. The

blots were washed three times for 20 min each at room

temperaturein 6x SSCandthree timesfor20min each in6x

SSC-0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate at the appropriate

tem-peraturegiven by the Tm in degrees Celsius of the

oligonu-cleotide. The blots were exposed to XAR-5 film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, N.Y.) in cassettes containing an

amplifying screen for various lengths of time at -70°C.

The oligonucleotides werelabeledin 15 to 20 pi of 50 mM

Tris (pH

7.6)-10

mM MgCl2-5 mM dithiothreitol-0.1 mM

spermidine-0.1 mM EDTA with 8 pmol of synthetic

oligo-nucleotide, 100 ,uCi of [-y-32P]ATP(specific activity, >5,000 Ci/mmol; Amersham, Braunschweig, Federal Republic of

Germany), and 10 U of T4 polynucleotide kinase (New

England BioLabs, Schwalbach, Federal Republic of

Ger-many) by incubation for 1 h at 37°C. The kinase was

inactivated byincubation for 10 min at75°C; the nucleotides

were extracted by phenol, and the labeled oligonucleotide

was purified and separated from residual [-y-32P]ATP with

push columns (Stratagene, Heidelberg, Federal Republic of

Germany). The resulting specific activity of the labeled oligonucleotide was 2 x 108 to5 x 108 cpm/,ug.

RESULTS

Sequence data. Evolutionarily less-conserved regions of

potential use as target sites for genus- or species-specific

oligonucleotideprobes were identified by comparison within

the collection of determined mycobacterial 16S rRNA

se-quences as well as with published sequences (9). On the

on April 12, 2020 by guest

http://jcm.asm.org/

(3)

100 bp

266 247 267

"r-l

5,

260264

r-ir-FIG. 1. Physicalmapof the oligonucleotides used withrespect to theirtargetsites in the16SrRNA. Thespecies-specific region in the rRNA molecule is indicated byan arrow.

basis of the extent ofsequence variability, several regions

werechosen;aselectionof these is described here. Figure1

illustrates a physical map of the selected oligonucleotide

targetsites onthe 16S rRNA.

Aregion knowntobe highly variable in eubacteria, i.e.,

positions 200 to 240 according to the IUB numbering of

Escherichia coli, ispartially contained within thepartof 16S

rRNAdeterminedtobeapossible species-specific region for

mycobacteria (Fig. 2). Inspection of the aligned sequences

revealed small butconsistent sequencedifferences between

thespecies investigated. In detail, uniquesequencestretches

can be definedfor the M. tuberculosis group (including M.

bovis and M. africanum), theM. aviumgroup(including M.

paratuberculosis), M. kansasii (including M. gastri, M.

simiae,and M. scrofulaceum),M.chelonae,M.smegmatis,

M. terrae, M. gordonae, M. szulgai, M. malmoense, M.

intracellulare, M. nonchromogenicum, M.xenopi, M.

fortu-itum, M. flavescens, M. marinum, M. sphagni, M. cookii,

M. komossense, M.farcinica,and M.phlei.

A few regions were initially characterized as potentially

genusspecific (Fig. 3). These regions showed mismatches of

atleast two bases when compared to published 16S rRNA

sequences(4, 7-9),includingsequencesfromclosely related

species belongingtothe

Corynebacterium-Nocardia-Actino-myces group.

Oligonucleotide 414 (Fig. 3A) is invariable in the

myco-bacterial species investigated, except for M. tuberculosis

(onemismatch) and M. xenopi (characterized byaninsertion

of threenucleotides). The region of oligonucleotide 247 (Fig.

3B) is characterized by single mismatches ofonebase each

with M.xenopi andM.flavescens aswellas amismatchof

two bases with M. nonchromogenicum. Oligonucleotides

266 and 267(Fig. 3C) targetthe sameregion in 16S rRNA.

Except for M. simiae, the sequence of which is less

con-served within thispartof the small-subunitrRNA,

mycobac-teria show nucleotide stretches identical tooligonucleotide

266or267. Notably,M.flavescens showsasingle mismatch

tooligonucleotide 267. Oligonucleotide 260 (Fig. 3D),aswell asoligonucleotide 264 (Fig. 3E), is well conserved within the

mycobacterial species investigated.

Specificity of oligonucleotides. Selected oligonucleotides

wereinvestigated inmoredetailtoevaluate theirspecificity.

Sufficient differences in 16S rRNA positions 161to215to

defineoligonucleotide probes which should distinguish

my-cobacteria at the species level were present. Thus, as an

example, synthetic 20-mers within this region which were

complementary to nucleotides from the M. tuberculosis

group(including M. bovis andM. africanum),M. avium-M.

paratuberculosis, and M. intracellularewere32Plabeledand

hybridized with nucleic acid extracts. The probes

comple-mentary toM.tuberculosis,M.avium, andM.intracellulare

hybridized onlytothe nucleic acids from thecorresponding

species but not to nucleic acids fromany other

mycobacte-rial species investigated (Fig. 4).

Thecomplement of oligonucleotide 247 (reverse 247)was

hybridized to nucleic acid extracts of various bacteria,

including close relatives of the genus Mycobacterium, and

AAC TGG GTC TAA TAC CGG ATA GG-ACCA

.A ..T.- ..G

.A ..T.-..

..A ... T-C..T

..A ... CACC.TG

... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..-.... .TT .GC

... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..-.... .TT .GC

... ... ... ... ... ..A ... ..-...C ..A .GC

... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...C ..A .GC

*-- ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

... ... ... ... ... ..A ... T.-.T.. T.C TC.

... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..-..T. ... AC.

... ... ... ... ... ... ... T.-.... T.. AC.

... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..C... .C.

... ... ... ... ... ... ... CACC.TT .T. .T.

CGG GAT GCA TG--TCT-TGT

..C AC.

..C .C.

NT. .TC

.T. .TC

.TT .GC

.AT .C.

... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. T.. ...

... ..--C..-...

... ..--c ..-...

... ..--C..-..G ... ..--C..-..G

T.. ..--...C-...

T.. ..--GGG-...

... ..G-...

T.. C.G-.T.--..

T.. ..G-.G.--.. ... ..G--..-G.G

GGT GGA AAG C

T.C ..G-.G.--.. ... ... ... .

T.. ..G-.G... ... ... ... .

... .GCCTGG.A- ..- ... ... .

... ..GCCTGG.A- ..- ... ... .

... .. .. ... ... ... * .

... ..--GTG-... ... ... ... .

... ..-T...--.. ... ... ... .

*. .. .. .

*...-*. ... .

*. ...--.

*.. ... *...

A. G... ... .

M.tuberculosis

M.chelonae

M.fortuitum

M.flavescens

M.smegmatis

M.simiae

M.nonchromogenicum

M.terrae

M.xenopi M.gordonae M.scrofulaceum M.avium

M.paratuberculosis M.intracellulare M.gastri

M.kansasii M.malmoense

M.szulgai M.marinum M.sphagni

M.cookii

M.komossense

M.farcinica

M.phlei

FIG. 2. Alignment of mycobacterial16SrRNAsequences.The first nucleotide inthefigure correspondstoE.coli 16SrRNAposition161

(IUB nomenclature).The 16SrRNAsequencesofM.bovis,M.bovisBCG,M. tuberculosisH37,and M. africanumareidenticaltothat of M. tuberculosis andthereforearenotshown. M. tuberculosiswasusedasthe referencesequence. Nucleotides differentfrom those of M.

tuberculosisareindicated; dashes indicate deletions. The complementary strand of theunderlined sequenceswasusedas aspecies-specific probe in theexperiment illustrated in Fig. 4.

... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. TTC TGC ... ..--.GG-G.. ... ... ... ... ... ... ..A ... ..-.... .A. ..CA.. ..--..C-... ...

... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..-.... .TT .GC ... ..--C..-... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..-...T .AA ..C ... ...

... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..-...T AA ..C ... ..-.... C. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..-...T TTA .GC ... ..--...-.TA ...

... ... ... ... ...

... ... ... ... ...

... ... ... ... ...

... ... ... ... ...

on April 12, 2020 by guest

http://jcm.asm.org/

(4)

BODDINGHAUS

A

B

c

ATC ..T .T. ..A TO T...

T... T...

T.. ... ... ... ..

T...

T...

T...

T... T.. ... ... ... ..

T... T... T...

T.. ... ... ... ..

GGTT.. ... ... ... ..

T... T...

TTG TCG CGT TGT TCGTGAAA

... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ..

T... .. .... .

... ... ... ... .. ...

... ... ... ... ... ... ..

... ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... ... ...G. ... . . .. . . C

... ... ... ... ... ... ..

ACGGCT TAA CTG TGA GCG TG

... ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... ... .. .... ... .... .... ... ..*. ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... ... .. ..A ... ... ... ..G ..A ... ... ... ..G ..A ... ... ... ..G ..A ... ... ... ..G ..A ... ... ... ..G ..A ... ... ... ..G

..A ...C.. ... ..G

GG. CC CG.

TTT... TG.

T.. NA. C

GC. ... M. N

TCT ... TG.

TC... G....N

in. ... CA ... ..

TT. ..CC.A ... TT. ..Cc...

TT. ... CCA ...

NN. ... ... C.GGA- ... ..

.GA..A... C.GAA. .GA ... ... C.GAA.

.N. CTN.

.N. N.... CTG.

.C..CT.

N. C.GGA.

N. C.G AN.

N. CNGNN.

D

GGGTTT GAC ATG CAC AGG AC

... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... ..

E

TCC CTT GTG GCC-TGT GTG CA

... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ... ... -...;. .. ... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... ... .... H.tuberculosis N.aviuw N.gastri M.kansasii M.arinum N.paratuberculosis N.gordonae N.scrofulaceum N.szulgai N. intracellulare N.malmoense N.fortuitua N.chelonae N.smegmatis N. terrace N.nonchromogenicun N.xenopi N.flavescens N.simiae

G.. TNN T.. T.-G.. N.A G.. T.. T.. ..T-G.. ACA ..

N.T T.N .G. .TN-G.. TCA ..

CT. T.C .GA ..G-CC. TCA ..

N.TN.G .G. ..T-N.. TCA ..

....NG.N .T.-GO.. A.A

C.... T.A .T.-G.. .. ..

C.. ..N T.N.T.-G.. ..A..

CN. TC. T.. ATATG.. ..A ..

Arachnia propionica Propionibacteriuw freudenreichii Propionibacteriumacnes Actinomycesbovis Actinomycesviscosis Corynebacteriumi variabilis Nocardiaalbus Nocardialuteus Pimelobacterjensenii

FIG. 3. Alignment ofmycobacterial 16S rRNAsequenceswithselectedpublished 16S rRNAsequences (4, 7, 8), includingthosefrom

species belonging to the related Corynebacterium-Nocardia-Actinomyces group. N, Undetermined nucleotide. (A) Oligonucleotide 414

region, correspondingto E. coli positions 212 to230; (B) oligonucleotide247 region, corresponding to E. coli positions 590to 609; (C) oligonucleotide 266-267 region, correspondingtoE.coli positions 614to633; (D)oligonucleotide260region,correspondingtoE.coli positions

988to1007;(E) oligonucleotide 264region,correspondingtoE.coli positions 1027to1046.

demonstratedanexclusivespecificity for mycobacteria (Fig.

5). Bacterialspeciesother thanmycobacteriadidnot

gener-atepositivesignals.Asexpectedfrom thesequence

compar-isons, thisprobe didnothybridizeunderstringent conditions

to nucleicacidsextracted fromM. nonchromogenicum, the

sequence ofwhich differs by twobases in thisregion.

Oligonucleotides complementary to oligonucleotide 260,

264, or 266 and 267 were used as primers in the PCR on several differenttemplate DNAs to evaluate the specificity

of these potentially genus-specific regionsforamplification.

Thus, theseprimers shoulddirect thepreferential synthesis

oftheappropriate 16S rRNA genefragmentfrom

mycobac-teriabut notfrom otherspecies. Most importantly, human

DNA, which is present in clinical samples, should not

GC mT .. ... .. ... .. ... .. ... .. ... TT... CT ..A GT ..C CT ... TT .GN AG ... AG ... AG ... AG ...

GG. ... N.. G. ... ...

GG . ... ...

CTN ... N..

CT. ... ...

CG. ... ...

GGT ... ...

GGT ... ...

GGN ... ...

.CC ... ..T ..

..C ..G ..T . .

.CC ... ... ..

... GAG ..T.N

... G.GT.N NN

..C C.G N.... .ACCTN ..C .N

.AACCTN ..C ..

.CTGNT ..T

... ... ...

. .. .NN ...

A.. C...

A.. C.N ...

..A A...

... ... ... ... ... ... ..

..ATG. C....

... TT. T.... ... GTT C.. G.

... TGG GT. TT

..ATG. C.. .T

GG. G0. CC. CA ..A ... C.. .A

G.A ... C.. .A N.A ... C.. .A

on April 12, 2020 by guest

http://jcm.asm.org/

(5)

B c

- M. avium-chester

- M.avium-intra.ellulare -M.scrofulaceum -M.kansasii -M.terrae

- M.gastri

M. gordonae

_- - M.tuberculosis

- M.fortuitum

M.flavescens

M.marinum

M.szulgai

M.nonchromogenicum

M.xenopi

M.malmoense

M.simiae

M.chelonae

N.asteroides

A.israelii

P.picketii

FIG. 4. Hybridizationofnucleic acids (1 ,ug)from the indicated bacterialspeciestospecies-specific oligonucleotide probes.P. pick-ettii, Pseudomonas pickettii. (A) Sequence ACC ACA AGACAT GCA TCC CG, specific for M. tuberculosis. Hybridization was

performed at 52°C, and washings were performed at 61°C. (B) Sequence ACC AGA AGA CAT GCG TCT TG, specific for M. avium-M. paratuberculosis. Hybridizationwasperformed at52°C, and washings were performed at60°C. (C) Sequence ACC TAA AGACAT GCG CCTAA, specific forM. intracellulare. Hybrid-ization was performed at 50°C, and washings were performed at 550C.

M. avium -t_

M.intracellulare

M.scrofulaceum

-M.kansasii

M.terrae

M.gastri - _

M.gordonae -M.fortuitum

M.tuberculosis

-M.flavescens _

M.marinum

M.szulgai

M.nonchromogenicum

M. xenopi

-M.malmoense - _

M.simiae

--N.asteroides

- P.acnes

- S.vnds

- C.paurometabourm

- Rhodococcusequi

- S.hirsuta

- N.autotrophica

M. chelonae

M. cookii

M.sphagni ab

M. komossee-s_

M. smegmatis

M.phiei *

FIG. 5. Hybridizationof nucleic acids(1 ,ug)from theindicated

bacterial speciesto anoligonucleotide broadly reactive for

myco-bacteriaatthegenuslevel (reverse 247, with sequence lT- CAC GAA CAA CGC GAC AA;hybridization wasperformed at52°C, andwashingswereperformedat55°C).P.acnes,Propionibacterium

acnes;S.viridis, Saccharomonospora viridis;C.paurometabolum,

Corynebacterium paurometabolum; S.hirsuta,Saccharopolyspora hirsuta;N.autotrophica,Nocardiaautotrophica.

interfere with the amplification of mycobacterial DNA. As

canbeseeninFig.6AtoC(lane 1),thecombination of these primerswitha second primercomplementarytoacommon sequence within bacterial 16S rRNA (i.e., oligonucleotide

246 [10]) resulted in the synthesis ofa prominent band of

amplifiedDNAwiththe appropriate size in thepresence of

mycobacterial DNA. Incontrast, no specificbandof

corre-spondingsizewasvisible whenamplificationwasperformed

with human DNA as a template (Fig. 6A to C, lane 6). In

addition, the simultaneous presence of human DNA and

mycobacterial DNA did not interfere with the specific

am-plification of mycobacterial DNA (Fig. 6Ato C, lane 7). A

faint band ofamplified DNA was observed for the related

species Actinomyces israeliiwhen an oligonucleotide

com-plementary to oligonucleotide 260 was used but not when

reverse264orreverse266-267wasused (Fig. 6AtoC, lane

3). Amplification carried out on total DNA from Nocardia

asteroids, another species closely relatedtothemembers of

the genus Mycobacterium (24), did not result in visible

amplified fragments (Fig. 6A to C, lane 2). Likewise,

per-forming the PCR on DNA from more distantly related

membersof thefamily Enterobacteriaceaedidnotyieldany

band(Fig.6Ato C, lanes 4 and5).

Extractionofnucleicacids, reverse transcription, and

sen-sitivity of the amplification reaction. A simple procedure

basedon chemical and enzymatic methods was established

to yield DNA as well as RNA from mycobacteria. This

method results in extraction of intact, undegraded rRNA

molecules(Fig.7A).Wereasoned that thehighcopynumber of rRNA should facilitate the development of sensitive assaysbasedondetectionof nucleic acids. In ordertomake rRNA accessible to the amplification procedure, reverse

transcriptase is used to preparecDNA before the

conven-tionalPCR. Wegenerated cDNA with aprimerwhichdoes

not interfere with the specificity of the PCR by defining a

short 12-mer oligonucleotide for the reverse transcriptase reaction (Fig. 7B and C). Because of its shortness, this

primerdoes not formastable hybridwithits target DNA at

60°C,the temperature under whichannealingwasperformed

during the amplification cycles; therefore, the use of this

primer in the PCR does not result in an amplified DNA

fragment (Fig. 7D).

Thesensitivity of theamplification procedure was

inves-tigatedwith M. tuberculosis as amodel systemby

amplifi-cation of the probe site in a 1,030-base-pair (bp) fragment

withprimers246 andreverse264. Theeffect ofusingthehigh

copy number of rRNA on the sensitivity of the assay was

investigated by first performing reverse transcription of

rRNAinto cDNA.

Byusing serialdilutions ofpurifiednucleicacids, 10pgof

purifiednucleic acids addedtothereaction mixture could be

amplifiedsufficientlytoyieldadetectable bandinanagarose

gel (Fig. 8). Whenthe presence ofamplified mycobacterial

DNA was identified by hybridization with a 32P-labeled

oligonucleotide by slot blot analysis the sensitivity was

improved approximately 100-fold. Interestingly, when

re-verse transcription of the nucleic acid extracts into cDNA

was performed first, sensitivity was increased 103-fold.

A

.

-Mm

on April 12, 2020 by guest

http://jcm.asm.org/

(6)

1756 BODDINGHAUS ET AL.

electrophoresedthrough a 0.8% agarose gel, a discrete band

of approximately 1.0 kilobases (kb) was visible in samples

containing 500 mycobacteria when nucleic acids were used

without prior reversetranscription as a substrate for the Taq

polymerase (Fig. 9). However, reverse transcribing the

rRNA into cDNA before the PCR resulted in a clear-cut

band of theappropriate size in samples containing as few as

approximately 30 mycobacteria. Combining the

amplifica-tion procedure with a slot blot hybridizaamplifica-tion format resulted

ina detection limit of threemycobacteria in a sample (Fig.

9).

Fi

FIG. 6. Specificityof selectedoligonucleotides in the PCR. The PCRwasperformedasdescribedinMaterials andMethods with 100

ngofbacterialDNA and1 ,ug of human DNA. Shown is ananalysis

ofamplifiedDNAby electrophoresison a0.8%agarosegelwith 10

,ul of the amplification reaction mixture. Lanes 1, Mycobacterial DNA; lanes 2,N. asteroides; lanes3, A. israelii; lanes4,

Pseudo-monasspecies; lanes 5,E.coli;lanes 6, humanDNA;lane 7, human

DNA and mycobacterial DNA; lanes 8, noDNA. M. avium was

usedasthesourceof mycobacterialDNA.(A) PCR with primers246

(AGAGTTTGATCC TGG CTC AG) andreverse264(TGC ACA

CAGGCC ACA AGG GA) directing the synthesis ofa 1,030-bp

gene fragment; (B) PCRwith primers 246and reverse 260 (GTC

CTG TGC ATGTCAAACCC) directingthesynthesis ofa990-bp

gene fragment; (C) PCR with primer 246 in combination with a

mixture ofreverse 266(CACGCT CAC AGT TAAGCCGT)and

reverse 267 (CAC GCC CAC AGT TAA GCT GT) directing the

synthesisofa620-bpgenefragment.Themolecularmassmarker is

the 1-kbladder(GIBCO BRL).

Thus, 100 fg of nucleic acids yielded a clearly detectable

band in anagarose gel, and even 0.1 fg of purified nucleic

acids yielded a clear-cut positive signal when the PCR

mixture was hybridized with a 32P-labeled oligonucleotide

(Fig. 8). Given that the size of theM.tuberculosisgenomeis

2.2 x

109

daltons(5), 0.1 fg of nucleic acids corresponds to

approximately 2% of the total nucleic acidcontentofasingle

bacterium.

As a further test to determine the sensitivity of the

amplification procedure, nucleic acids extracted from

se-quential dilutions ofa suspensioncontaining aknown

num-ber of M. tuberculosis cells were added to the reaction

mixtures. When aliquots of the amplification mixture were

DISCUSSION

The purpose of a clinical microbiology laboratory is to

rapidly and accurately provide clinicians with information

about thepresence or absence of amicroorganism that may

be involved in an infectious disease process. Traditionally,

this involves the isolation of a suspected pathogen from a

clinical specimenfollowed by identification of the organism.

Most of the tests necessary for identification require the

isolation of a pure culture of the suspected bacterium.

Consequently, the isolation and identification of slowly

growing pathogens like mycobacteria entails a period of

several weeks.

Inthispaper, wedescribeamethodfortherapid detection

and identification of mycobacteria based on the in vitro

amplificationofmycobacterial nucleic acids. Any detection system based onnucleic acids mustfulfilltwocriteria: (i)it mustresult inreliablerelease ofnucleic acids fromcells, and

(ii) it must be capable of definition of oligonucleotides ofa

characterized specificity.

Thecomplex structure andimpermeability of the cell walls

of mycobacteria makes the lysis of mycobacteria for the

extractionof DNA as well as RNAdifficult. Thus, common

methods forisolatingDNAor RNA usephysicalprocedures

of cell disruption, e.g., the use of French presses (26). However, such methodsare

impractical

inclinical

laborato-ries. We have therefore established asimple and versatile

procedure for isolating DNA and RNAfrom mycobacteria by chemical andenzymatic methods (Fig. 7).

rRNA, with its species-specific variable regions, may

provideageneraltargetfordeveloping taxon-specific oligo-nucleotide probes for virtuallyany species of interest. The

identification of species-specific regions by comparison of

newly isolated 16S rRNA sequences with published 16S

rRNA sequences (9), the number of which is constantly

increasing,isrelatively straightforward. Toestablishtheuse

of rRNA-derived oligonucleotide probes todifferentiate

be-tween closely related taxa, we haveinvestigated the genus

Mycobacterium as a model system. The results presented

here indicate that there are small but consistent sequence

differences in certain regions of therRNA molecule which

allow the definition ofhighly specificoligonucleotides, i.e.,

at the genus, group, or species level. We were able to

identify a highly variable region which is extremely useful

for definition of species-specific probes in mycobacteria.

Thusfar,thefeasibilityof thisregion fordeveloping species-specificDNAprobeshas beenexperimentally demonstrated

with M. tuberculosis, M.avium, and M. intracellulare.

Our aimwas to outline a strategy which shouldbe

com-parable in specificity and sensitivity to traditional culture

techniques in mycobacteriology, i.e., a method which can

detectvirtually anymycobacterial organism present in low

numbers in asample irrespective ofthe species affiliation.

Forthis purpose, we selectedregions in the mycobacterial

J. CLIN. MICROBIOL.

on April 12, 2020 by guest

http://jcm.asm.org/

(7)

A

.1

B

c

D

4

FIG. 7. Extraction of nucleic acids, cDNA synthesis, andamplification. (A) Extractionof nucleic acids from M.tuberculosis,resultingin chromosomalDNAandintactrRNAbands.(B) cDNAsynthesis witholigonucleotideGGC AGT CTC TCA (correspondingto E.coli16S rRNApositions 1162 to 1151) asprimer;anethidiumbromide-stained agarose gelisshown. Lane 1, cDNAsynthesis (theappropriateshift of the 16SrRNAbandis indicatedby an arrow);lane 2,inputnucleicacids with the 16Sand 23SrRNAbands.Numberson theleft indicate sizes inkilobases. (C) Autoradiogram made when[aL-32P]dCTPwasincorporated during thecDNA synthesis reaction. Thearrowpointsto the newlysynthesized cDNA strand; numbers on the left indicate sizes in kilobases. (D) Inability ofoligonucleotide GGC AGTCTC TCA tofunctionas aprimer in the PCR. The PCR was performed as described in Materials and Methods withprimers246 and reverse264(TGC ACACAG GCC ACA AGG GA) (lane1) orprimer246incombinationwith GGC AGT CTCTCA(lane 2).Purified nucleic acids(100ng)from M.avium wereusedas atemplate. The molecularmassmarker is the1-kbladder(GIBCOBRL).

rRNA that are useful as target sites for genus-specific

oligonucleotides. The selection was based on the extent of

sequence variability as revealed by comparison with

pub-lished 16S rRNA sequences (9). The characterized

oligonu-cleotides exhibitedgenus specificity in a hybridization

for-mat(Fig.5) anddirectedthesynthesis of theappropriate16S

rRNA genefragmentwhen usedasprimersinthe

amplifica-tion reacamplifica-tion preferentially when amplification was carried

out on mycobacterial DNA (Fig. 6). Following generic amplification of mycobacterial nucleic acids after optional synthesis ofcDNA, a DNAprobe wasused to detect and

identifytheamplifiedproductatthespecieslevel. We show

in this paper that samples containing fewer than 10 intact

mycobacterialcells cangive positiveresults (Fig.9).

Theultimateuseof this proceduretodetectmycobacteria inclinical specimens will depend on factors which were not evaluated inthisstudy, i.e.,handling,versatility, sensitivity,

andspecificity inclinicalpractice. Forexample,becauseof

the favorable kinetics of oligonucleotides when compared

with cloned probes, hybridization and washing times have

reportedly been reduced to 15 to 20 min and 2 to 3 min,

respectively (15). We expect that the application ofDNA

probes coupled with specific amplification of target

se-quenceswill contribute to a more rapid diagnosisof

myco-bacterial infections.

Insummary, wehaveprovidedevidence thatamplification

of rRNAsequences allows the identification and

differenti-ation ofmycobacteria at a genus, group, or species level.

Based on rRNA as a general structure which permits the

rapid generation of specific DNA probes for eubacteria

without any cloning procedures (3, 10), asimilar approach

would probably succeed with many other bacteria, i.e., it

would determine the presence of genera of bacteria in

clinicalspecimens by the PCR followed by identification at

a:

FIG. 8. Sensitivityof thedetectionofmycobacterialnucleic acidsfollowing amplificationwithprimers246 and reverse 264. Thetwogels

ontheleftshow ananalysisofamplifiedDNAbyelectrophoresis on a0.8%agarosegel with 10 ,ulof theamplification reactionmixture. A stocksolution ofpurified nucleic acids fromM.tuberculosiswasdilutedtogivethefollowingamountsin thesamples: lane1, 10ng; lane2, i ng;lane3,100 pg; lane 4, 10 pg; lane 5, 1 pg; lane 6, 100fg;lane 7, 10fg;lane8, 1fg;lane9, 10pg; lane 10, 1 pg; lane11, 100fg;lane12, 10fg; lane 13,1fg;lane 14, 0.1fg;lane15, 0.01fg;and lane 16, no DNA. Reversetranscriptionwasperformedonthenucleicacidsin lanes 9 to 15beforethePCR. Themolecular mass marker is the 1-kb ladder(GIBCO BRL). The two panels on the rightillustrateanexperiment inwhich20-,ul samplesof the amplifiedDNAwere appliedtonitrocellulose andhybridizedtoACC ACA AGA CATGCA TCC CG. (A) Purified nucleic acidswereuseddirectlyinPCR;(B) reversetranscription ofpurified nucleicacids into cDNA withGGC AGT CTCTCAas

theprimerwasperformed first.

on April 12, 2020 by guest

http://jcm.asm.org/

(8)

A,

BiY

FIG. 9. Sensitivityof the PCR. ThePCR was performed with primers 246 and reverse 264. On the left is an analysis of amplified DNA by electrophoresison a0.8%agarosegel.Nucleic acidswereextractedfromsamplescontaining5 x 104(lane1), 5 x103 (lane 2), 5 x 102(lane 3), 5 x 101(lane4), 5(lane5), 3x103(lane6), 3 x102(lane7), 3x 10' (lane8), 3(lane9),or 3 x10-1(lane10) M.tuberculosis bacilli. Reverse transcriptionwasperformedon thenucleicacidsin lanes 6 to 10beforethePCR. Lane 11 is the negative control. On the right,20-,ulsamples of theamplifiedDNAwereappliedtonitrocelluloseandhybridizedtoACCACA AGACAT GCATCCCG. (A) Reverse transcription of the extractedrRNAinto cDNAwasperformedfirst, withGGCAGT CTC TCAastheprimer(B)Extractednucleic acidswereuseddirectlyin thePCR.

the desired taxon level with appropriate taxon-specific

probes.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank W. Heikens for synthesis of oligonucleotides; K. Schroder, B. J0rgensen, and J. Kazda for providing strains; S. Maibom for typing the manuscript; and D. Bitter-Suermann for continuousencouragement.

This workwassupportedbyagrantfrom the Bundesministerium fur Forschung undTechnologie(01Ki 89117) to E.C. Bôttger.

LITERATURECITED

1. Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl (ed.). 1987. Current protocols in molecular biology. JohnWiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

2. Bates,J. H. 1979. Diagnosis oftuberculosis. Chest 76(Suppl.): 757-763.

3. Bottger,E.C.1989.Rapid determination ofbacterialribosomal RNAsequencesby direct sequencing of enzymatically amplified DNA. FEMSMicrobiol. Lett. 65:171-176.

4. Charfreitag, O., M. D. Collins, and E. Stackebrandt. 1988. Reclassification ofArachnia propionica asPropionibacterium

propionicus comb. nov. Int. J.Syst. Bacteriol.38:354-357. 5. Clark-Curtiss, J. E., W. R. Jacobs, M. A. Docherty, L. R.

Ritchie,andR.CurtissIm.1985. MolecularanalysisofDNA and construction ofgenomic libraries of Mycobacterium leprae. J. Bacteriol.161:1093-1102.

6. Collins, F. M. 1988. AIDS-related mycobacterial disease. Springer Semin. Immunopathol. 10:375-391.

7. Collins,M.D.,M.Dorsch, andE.Stackebrandt. 1989.Transfer ofPimelobactertumescens toTerrabactergen. nov. as Terra-bactertumescens comb. nov. andof Pimelobacterjensenii to NocardioidesasNocardioidesjenseniicomb. nov. Int.J.Syst. Bacteriol. 39:1-6.

8. Collins, M.D., J. Smida, and E.Stackebrandt. 1989.

Phyloge-netic evidence for the transfer of Caseobacter polymorphus (Crombach) to the genusCorynebacterium. Int. J. Syst. Bacte-riol. 39:7-9.

9. Dams, E., L. Hendriks, Y. Van de Peer,J.-M. Neefs, G. Smits,J. Vandenkempt, and R. De Wachter. 1988. Compilation of small ribosomal subunit RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 16: r87-rl75.

10. Edwards, U., T. Rogall, H. Blocker, M. Emde, and E. C. Bottger. 1989. Isolation and direct sequencing of entire genes. Characterization of a gene coding for 16S ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 17:7843-7853.

11. Gobel, U.B., A. Geiser, and E. J. Stanbridge. 1987. Oligonucle-otide probes complementary to variable regions of ribosomal RNA discriminate between Mycoplasma species. J. Gen. Mi-crobiol. 133:1969-1974.

12. Grimont, F., and P. A. D. Grimont. 1986. Ribosomal nucleic acid gene restriction patternsaspotentialtaxonomic tools. Ann. Inst. Pasteur(Paris)137B:165-175.

13. Hance, A. J., B. Grandchamp, V. Lévy-Frébault, D. Lecossier, J. Rauzier, D. Bocart, and B. Gicquel. 1988.Detectionand identi-fication of mycobacteria by amplification of mycobacterial DNA. Mol. Microbiol. 3:843-849.

14. Hartskeerl, R. A., M. Y. L. deWit, and P. R. Klatser. 1989. Polymerase chain reaction forthe detection ofMycobacterium leprae.J. Gen. Microbiol. 135:2357-2364.

15. Haun, G., and U. Gobel. 1987. Oligonucleotide probes for genus-, species-andsubspecies-specificidentification of repre-sentatives of the genus Proteus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 43: 187-193.

16. Lane,D.J.,B.Pace,G.J.Olsen,D.A.Stahl,M.L.Sogin,and

N. R. Pace. 1985. Rapid determination of16S ribosomal RNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:6955-6959.

17. Musial,C.E.,L. S.Tice,L.Stockman,andG. D. Roberts. 1988. Identification ofmycobacteria from culturebyusingthe Gen-Proberapid diagnostic system forMycobacterium avium

com-plexandMycobacterium tuberculosiscomplex.J. Clin.

on April 12, 2020 by guest

http://jcm.asm.org/

(9)

biol. 26:2120-2123.

18. Olive,D. M.1989. Detection of enterotoxigenic Escherichiacoli after polymerase chain reaction amplification with a

thermo-stable DNA polymerase. J. Clin.Microbiol. 27:261-265. 19. Petrini, B., G. Svastengren, S. E. Hoffner, G. Unge, and U.

Wildstrom. 1989. Tenosynovitis of the hand caused by Myco-bacterium terrae. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 8:722-724.

20. Rossau, R., E.vanMechele, J.deLey,and H.vanHeuverswijn. 1989. Specific Neisseria gonorrhoeae DNA-probes derived fromribosomal RNA. J. Gen. Microbiol. 135:1735-1745. 21. Saiki, R. K., D.M.Gelfand, S.Stoffel, S.J.Scharf,R.Higuchi,

G. T. Horn, K. B. Mullis, and H. A. Erlich. 1988. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA withathermostable

DNApolymerase. Science 239:487-491.

22. Stackebrandt, E., and C. R. Woese. 1981. The evolution of

prokaryotes, p. 1-31. In M. C. Carlile, J. F. Collins, and

B. E. B. Moseley (ed.), Molecular and cellular aspects of microbialevolution. Cambridge University Press,Cambridge. 23. Wayne, L. G., and G. P. Kubica. 1986. Family

Mycobacteri-aceaeChester 1897, 63AL, p. 1436-1457. In P. H. A. Sneath,

N. S.Mair,M. E.Sharpe,and J. G.Holt(ed.), Bergey'smanual ofsystematic bacteriology,vol. 2.The Williams & WilkinsCo., Baltimore.

24. Woese, C. R. 1987. Bacterial evolution. Microbiol. Rev. 51: 221-271.

25. Wolinsky, E. 1984. Nontuberculosis mycobacteria and associ-ated diseases. Microbiol. Ser. 15:1141-1207.

26. Yoshimura, H. H., and D. Y. Graham. 1988. Nucleic acid hybridization studies of mycobactin-dependent mycobacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 26:1309-1312.

on April 12, 2020 by guest

http://jcm.asm.org/

References

Related documents

In this present study, antidepressant activity and antinociceptive effects of escitalopram (ESC, 40 mg/kg) have been studied in forced swim test, tail suspension test, hot plate

This study investigates the influence of the skip fire cycle method for applied CDA to small displacement engine on specific fuel consumption and exhaust emissions

19% serve a county. Fourteen per cent of the centers provide service for adjoining states in addition to the states in which they are located; usually these adjoining states have

Field experiments were conducted at Ebonyi State University Research Farm during 2009 and 2010 farming seasons to evaluate the effect of intercropping maize with

It was decided that with the presence of such significant red flag signs that she should undergo advanced imaging, in this case an MRI, that revealed an underlying malignancy, which

Table  6 shows the performance comparison between the training phase of the serial and that of GPU versions of RF based virtual screening on different ligand data models

In the present study, the Socio-Economic factors of the selected investors attitude towards the investments are discussed with the help of following variables such as gender

The most important chemical functional groups present in the extracted lignin included methoxyl, hydroxyl, carboxyl and carbonyl. The results obtained from the