Prenatal
testosterone
and
language
development
Andrew
Whitehouse
Overview
1. Who
am
I?
2. Background
to
the
area
3. Current
study
– Another terrific longitudinal study!
4. Planned
work
(cerebral
lateralisation)
– Follow‐up study
– Autism PRISM study
5. Conclusions
My
path
Speech Pathologist PhD Oxford Telethon InstituteMe
• Autism
Research
Team
– Research
officers
and
assistants
– PhD
Students
Background
Sex
differences
• Language
development
– Males
<
females
– First
12
months
• Frequency joint attention
• Frequency joint attention
• Frequency dyadic interaction
– Rate
of
vocab
development
– Increased
risk
of
DLD
Sex
differences
• Assuming
sex
differences,
what
may
cause
this?
– Socio
‐
developmental
differences?
• Parental input?
S
ifi
i i fl
– Sex
‐
specific
genetic
influences
• CNTNAP2 (Whitehouse et al., 2011, Genes, Brain, Behavior)
• Influence in a different way
• To a greater or lesser extent
– Another
biological
difference
• Hormones?
Androgens
• Androgens – A generic term that for any natural or synthetic compound, usually a steroid hormone, that stimulates or controls the development and maintenance of male characteristics in vertebrates by binding to androgen receptors.1. Testosterone
2. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEAS)
3. 4-androstenedione (A4)
Prenatal
testosterone
• How
are
fetuses exposed
to
T?
Endogenous
Exogenous
Males have higher testosterone levels in-utero
Prenatal
testosterone
1. T in blood stream
2. Transceullular lipophilic pathway 3. Astrocyte glial cell
4. Binds with androgen receptor 5. Enters nucleus, binds with DNA,
affects transcription
Testosterone
Prenatal
testosterone
• Prenatal
testosterone
child
development?
– Difficult
to
study
in
humans
• Manipulation of hormone environment unethical!
– Natural
experiments
• Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH)
• Genetic deficiency in the enzyme 21‐hydroxylase • Overproduction of adrenal androgens
• Female testosterone within or above the typical male range
Prenatal
testosterone
• Congenital
Adrenal
Hyperplasia
– Females typically have VIQ < PIQ
• Hampson et al., 1998; Kelso et al., 2000; Kelso et al., 1999; Resnick et al., 1986
rate of language difficulties
–rate of language difficulties
• Plante et al., 1996
• But…
– difficult to extrapolate from clinical cases to the broader
population
Cambridge
Cohort
• Cambridge
Cohort
– Simon Baron‐Cohen and colleagues
– Second trimester amniotic fluid
Inverse association
Birth
Inverse association with expressive vocab
No association with verbal IQ (or PIQ)
Mixed evidence
12- 20 weeks 2 years 6-10 yearsCambridge
Cohort
• Amniocentesis
– Limitations
1. Unrepresentative samples2. Weak association with fetal circulatingg testosterone levels
Another
method
• Umbilical
cord
blood
– Advantage
• Easily obtained at normal delivery
Another
method
• Umbilical
cord
blood
– Limitations
• May not reflect concentrations during 1st& 2ndtrimester
(particularly GA weeks 8‐24).
• Perhaps advantageous?
Current
Study
Current
Study
• Aim:
– To determine the association between testosterone
concentrations from umbilical cord blood and early
language development
Birth
T concentrations from cord blood
Language development to age 3 years
Current
Study
• Western
Australian
Pregnancy
Cohort
(Raine)
Study
– 2900 pregnant women recruited between 1989 and 1991
– Randomized controlled trial of ultrasonography
• Follow
‐
up
– N = 2868 at birth – Every 2 – 3 years – Retention ~ 65%Predictor
variable
• Predictor
variable
– Umbilical
cord
testosterone
• At
birth
1989 1991
C d bl
d b i
d
828 bi h
– 1989
‐
1991
:
Cord
blood
obtained
at
828
births
– 2011:
Analyzed
for
androgens
20 years
Predictor
variable
• Biochemistry
– Step
1
• Measure total testosterone (LC/MS)
• SHBGSHBG (RIA)(RIA)
– Step
2
• Calculate ‘free testosterone’
– Free T = Total testosterone ‐SHBG
• Calculate BioT
– BioT = Free T + albumin‐bound testosterone
Predictor
variable
40 50 60 Females Males 0 10 20 30 40 0. 08 0.10 0.15 0.20 250. 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 700. 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 201. 1.25 1.30 1.35 1.40 1.45 1.50 1.55 1.60 651. 1.70 2.00 3.00 4.00 Fr eq u e n cyTotal testosteroneBioT concentrations (nM)
Predictor
variable
• Biochemistry
– Step
1
• Measure total testosterone (LC/MS)
• SHBG (RIA)
– Step
2
• Calculate ‘free testosterone’
– Free T = Total testosterone ‐SHBG
• Calculate BioT
– BioT = Free T + albumin‐bound testosterone – Quartiles: Quartile 1 (lowest) Quartile 4 (highest) – Separately for males and females
Outcome
variable
• Outcome
variable
– Infant
development
• Ages
1,
2
and
3
years
I f
M
i
i
Q
i
i
– Infant
Monitoring
Questionnaire
• Parent‐report
• Five domains
Outcome
variable
• Infant
Monitoring
Questionnaire
– Communication
“Does your child make sentences that are three or four words long?”
– Gross
Motor
Does your child run well, being able to stop himself without bumping into things or falling?
– Fine
Motor
Does your child hold a pencil or crayon with his fingers and thumb the way an adult does?
– Adaptive
After he watches you draw a cross (+) on paper, does your child make one like yours.
– Personal/Social
When playing with a stuffed animal or doll, does your child pretend to feed or dress it?
Outcome
variable
• Outcome
variable
– Infant
development
• Ages
1,
2
and
3
years
I f
M
i
i
Q
i
i
– Infant
Monitoring
Questionnaire
– Parent
‐
report
questionnaire
– 12
‐
,
24
‐
,
and
36
‐
month
questionnaires
– Clinical
cutoffs
for
each
scale
at
each
age
• Binary variable (‘Delayed’ vs ‘Not delayed’)
Statistics
Quartile 1 (Lowest)
Quartile 2 Quartile 3 Quartile 4 (highest)
Delayed % % % %
Quartile 1 (Lowest)
Quartile 2 Quartile 3 Quartile 4 (highest)
Delayed % % % %
Statistical
analyses
1. Sex
differences
in
IMQ
scores
2. Follow
‐
up
– BioT and
IMQ
scores
• Generalized Estimating Equations
– Include covariates (gestational age a birth, birthweight,
socioeconomic status)
Sex
differences
‘Communication’ was the only consistent sex-difference
Outcome
variable
• Language
delay
more
common
in
males
Males
4 5 6 5 % C I) for p air m e n t 0 1 2 3 Quartile 1 (lowest)Quartile 2 Quartile 3 Quartile 4
(highest) O dds Rat io (9 5 language I m p Testosterone concentrations
Males
4 5 6 5 % C I) for p air m e n t 0 1 2 3 Quartile 1 (lowest)Quartile 2 Quartile 3 Quartile 4
(highest) O dds Rat io (9 5 language I m p Testosterone concentrations
Males
4 5 6 5 % C I) fo r p air m e n t 0 1 2 3 Quartile 1 (lowest)Quartile 2 Quartile 3 Quartile 4
(highest) O dds Rat io (9 5 language I m p Testosterone concentrations
Males
4 5 6 5 % C I) fo r p air m e n t 0 1 2 3 Quartile 1 (lowest)Quartile 2 Quartile 3 Quartile 4
(highest) O dds Rat io (9 5 language I m p Testosterone concentrations
Males
4 5 6 5 % C I) fo r p air m e n t 0 1 2 3 Quartile 1 (lowest)Quartile 2 Quartile 3 Quartile 4
(highest) O dds Rat io (9 5 language I m p Testosterone concentrations
Females
0.8 1 1.2 1.4 % C I) fo r ir m ent 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Quartile 1 (lowest)Quartile 2 Quartile 3 Quartile 4
(highest) O dds Rat io (9 5 % language I m pa i Testosterone concentrations
Conclusions
• Findings
– Males:
testosterone
from
cord
blood =
risk
for
language
delay
– Females:
Females:
testosterone from cord blood =
testosterone
from
cord
blood =
↓
↓
risk
risk
for
language
delay
– Sex
specific
effects?
• Circulatory system
• Central Nervous System as well?
Planned
studies
Happening right now
Happening
right
now
Mechanisms
• How
does
prenatal
T
influence
language?
– Cerebral
lateralization
a
l Left
Whitehouse & Bishop, Neuropsychologia, 2009
V is uos pat ia Language Right Right Left
Cerebral
lateralisation
• LI
as
a
failure
to
develop
lateralisation?
• Long history (1920s)
– Mixed evidence
– For:
•Structural: Cohen et al., 1989; Jernigan et al., 1991; Plante et al.,
1991; Gauger et al., 1997; Herbert et al., 2003; Jäncke et al., 2007)
•Functional:Tzourio et al., 1994; Chiron et al., 1999; Bernal and
Altman, 2003; Lou et al., 1984, 1990; Ors et al., 2005).
– Against:
• Shafer et al., 2000; Trauner et al., 2000; Preis et al., 1998
Samuel Orton
Cerebral
lateralisation
• Oxford
study
– Adults
with:
• SLI • ASD t Hem is phere • SLI history • Typical– fTCD
• Word generation Lef t Right Hem is phereWhitehouse & Bishop, Brain, 2009
Cerebral
lateralisation
• Prenatal
testosterone
cerebral
lateralization
– Long
history
(1980s)
– Geschwind
and
Galaburda
Evidence
– Evidence
• Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia
– Handedness, dichotic listening
• Mixed at best
– Fell out of favour
Planned
Studies
1. Raine
study
follow
‐
up
– 50
low
BioT
and
50
high
BioT
(for
each
sex)
– fTCD
• Word generation (left hemisphere)
• Word generation (left hemisphere)
Left Right
Sex differences?
Planned
studies
2.
Prenatal
investigation
of
autism
“I knew from the very first time I held him in my arms that there was something different about him.”
Genetic evidence Postnatal evidence DoHAD Prenatal
Planned
studies
• But
ASD
is
diagnosis
in
postnatal
life…
– How
do
we
study
the
prenatal
period?
1% 18.7% ASD ‘Low’ risk ‘High’ risk Ri sk of A S D
Planned
studies
Planned
studies
• PRISM
– Pregnant
women
with
an
existing
child
with
ASD
Planned
studies
2. PRISM
– Pregnant
women
with
an
existing
child
with
ASD
Follow development of child Birth
Planned
studies
N = 100 N = 100 Case families Control familiesConclusions
Key
messages
• Summary:
1. Prenatal period is an important epoch
• Testosterone (Whitehouse et al., in press, JCPP)
• Vitamin D (Whitehouse et al., 2012, Pediatrics)
2. Biology is also important…
Implications
• Once
we
identify
mechanisms,
we
can:
1. Promote the healthiest prenatal environment possible
2. Furthermore, we could:
• Identify subgroups of LI
• Increase monitoring of ‘at risk’ children. • Development of more targeted interventions
Next
steps
• Further
examine:
Prenatal testosteroneexposure
– Human replication
– Animal models
– Randomised controlled trials
Language development Cerebral lateralisaion
Acknowledgements
PsychologistsCheryl Dissanayake (La Trobe) Lauren Hollier (UWA) Murray Maybery (UWA)
Obstetricians
Pharmacologist
Jeff Keelan (UWA)
Paediatrician
Eugene Mattes (UWA) Michael Sawyer (Adelaide)
Obstetricians
Tony Murphy (UWA) John Newnham (UWA) Craig Pennell (UWA)
Michael Sawyer (Adelaide)
Gynaecologist
Martha Hickey (Melbourne)