• No results found

Hospices Under the Microscope: Are You Prepared for ZPICs?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Hospices Under the Microscope: Are You Prepared for ZPICs?"

Copied!
50
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Hospices Under the Microscope:

Are You Prepared for ZPICs?

Paula G. Sanders, Esquire Principal & Chair Health Care Practice

Post & Schell, PC Chubb Health Care Webinar April 2, 2013

(2)
(3)

Objectives

• Understand how ZPICs differ from other audits

• Discuss how a ZPIC audit unfolds

• Evaluate your risks and potential exposures

(4)

Medicare Integrity Programs

• Regional Home Health Intermediary (RHHI)

• Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) (Replacing fiscal intermediaries and carriers)

(5)

Medicare Integrity Programs

• Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs)

• Program Safeguard Contractors (PSCs)

• Zone Program Integrity Contractors (ZPICs)

• Medicare Prescription Drug Integrity Contractors (MEDICs)

• Quality Improvement Organizations (QIOs)

(6)

Fraud or Abuse?

• Fraud: intentional deception or

misrepresentation of facts for purpose of gaining an otherwise unauthorized benefit

• Abuse: actions that are inconsistent with accepted, sound medical or business

practices

 Directly or indirectly results in unnecessary costs

(7)

Zone Program Integrity Contractors

(ZPICs)

• Consolidation of PSCs and MEDICs

• Coordination of claims processing and benefit integrity activities

• Ensure integrity of ALL Medicare-related claims

 Parts A, B, C, D, Home Health, DME, Hospice and coordination of Medi-Medi data matches

(8)

ZPIC Function: Identify FRAUD

• Primary goal: investigate instances of suspected fraud, waste and abuse

 NOT RANDOM

• Identify need for CMS administrative actions

 Payment suspensions, prepayment edits or auto-denial edits

(9)

ZPIC Responsibilities

• Regional Medicare data analysis

• Fraud case development

• Fraud complaint processing & resolution

• Provider education related to fraud investigations

• Ability to initiate payment suspensions and provider exclusions

(10)

Possible Sources of ZPIC Cases

• Referrals from MACs

 Suspected fraudulent or abusive

situations or patterns (data analysis)

• Complaints from beneficiaries, other providers or whistleblowers

• Office of Inspector General (OIG) Hotline

(11)

ZPIC Investigative Authority

• Not required to give notice

• Request medical records & documentation

 No limit to record requests

 No defined look-back period

• Conduct on-site visits and interviews of employees & beneficiaries

• Use probe sampling, statistical sampling & extrapolation

(12)

Use of Statistical Sampling for

Overpayment Estimation

• A Medicare contractor may not use

extrapolation to determine overpayment amounts . . . . unless . . .

 There is a “sustained or high level of payment error;” or

 Documented educational intervention has failed to correct the payment error

(13)

Extrapolation

• No CMS guidance regarding “high error rate”

• ZPIC must give notice of extrapolation

unless part of law enforcement investigation

• Extrapolate findings of sample to universe of claims for specified period

• Result: substantial overpayment determinations

(14)

ZPIC Sanction Authority

• Suspend or withhold payments

• Determine & collect overpayments

• Refer for exclusion from Medicare

• Refer cases to law enforcement

• Grounds for possible revocation

 Violation of provider agreement

(15)

Challenging ZPIC Findings

• No appeal of payment suspensions

• Appeal overpayment demands through Medicare Administrative Appeal process

• Five levels of appeal

• Lengthy process

 May only halt recoupment through second level

(16)

ZPIC Appeal Levels

1. Redetermination: MAC

2. Reconsideration: Qualified Independent Contractor (QIC)

3. Request for Hearing: Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)

4. Review of ALJ Decision: Medicare Appeals Council (MAC)

(17)
(18)

Target Areas for Hospice Claims

• Election statements

• Certifications of terminal illness

 Patients ineligible for hospice care

• Eligibility and long lengths of stay

• Residence of patients: nursing homes (SNFs), assisted living facilities (ALFs), boarding homes

• Terminal diagnosis

(19)

Target Areas for Hospice Claims

• Poor documentation

• Inappropriate general inpatient care claims

• Inappropriate continuous care claims

• Duplicate drug claims

• Overlapping Part A claims (hospital, SNF)

(20)

Target Areas: Hospice Utilization in

SNFs (OIG Work Plan 2011)

Data mining: Hospice Medicare A claims and MDS

• Characteristics of nursing facilities with high hospice utilization

 Prior report: 82% of SNF/hospice claims did not meet coverage requirements

• Incentives to admit patients likely to have long stays

(21)
(22)

ZPIC Letters

• Identifies ZPIC authority to “conduct reviews of activities of providers…including medical utilization review and fraud review

• “Please return the requested information …within (15)(30) days. Failure to comply …may result in exclusion … and/or

suspension of payment [without notice], payment denial or declaration of

(23)

ZPIC Letters--Extrapolation

• “Please note failure to furnish this

information shall result in the cancellation of all relevant claims. . . . Any

overpayment determined by us may be projected by extrapolating from the actual overpayment to the entire universe.”

(24)

ZPIC Letters: Notice of On-Site

Visit

• Hand-delivered at time of visit

• “On [Date] an on-site inspection and

interviews of facility staff will be conducted by six (6) representatives from this office. At that time you will be asked to produce approximately thirty-six (36) patients’

records (Attachment A) and financial records (Attachment B).”

(25)

Types of Information Requested

• All contracts and agreements with

physicians, pharmacies, SNFs, ALFs, boarding homes

• List of all current and former employees

 Name, job title, date of birth, address,

phone number, date of hire/termination or resignation

(26)

Types of Information Requested

• 1099 or W2 statements for owners,

managers, directors and medical directors

• Payrolls: independent contractors and

regular employees with title and contact info

• 1099 statements for vendors

• Policies and procedures

(27)

Types of Information Requested

• Check registers, wire transfer registers, financial ledgers

• Name and number of Compliance Officer

• Contracts for accounting, management, financial consulting, bookkeeping

• “On the cover letter, please list the name and contact information for the person

(28)

Types of Patient Information

Requested

• Medical records for beneficiaries and dates of service as shown on attached spreadsheet

• Unduplicated list of beneficiaries

 Place of service address, phone number, dates of admission & death, discharge or revocation, primary nurse

(29)

Time Frames for Submitting

Documents

• Prepayment review: 30 calendar days of request, no extensions

 Claims denied if documents not received by day 45

• Post payment review: 30 calendar days of request, extensions discretionary

(30)

Hypothetical Case Study: Hospice

for the Debilitated

• Primary diagnosis for 69% of patients is debility, highest in the region

• ZPIC identifies this as an “outlier”

• ZPIC requests 30 medical records

• Files sent do not contain signed notice of election forms (100% error rate)

(31)

Hypothetical Case Study: Hospice

for the Debilitated

• 100% error rate for sample claims reviewed: $51,679.19

• “High error rate” allows ZPIC to extrapolate to all claims that had been paid during

period under review

$51,679.19 becomes

(32)

Hypothetical Case Study: Hospice for

the Debilitated--#1 (no regulatory

counsel)

• Hospice discovers that medical records clerk did not copy the notices of election

• Records were sent but not copied

• Hospice signed certification statement attesting to completeness of document production

• Called regulatory counsel upon notice of overpayment

(33)

Hypothetical Case Study: Hospice

for the Debilitated--#2 (with

regulatory counsel)

• Hospice bate-stamped all documents and did not sign certification statement

• Upon review of ZPIC findings, hospice re-reviews documents sent and locates 15 of the “missing” elections, as well as 10 more that were not sent (will be addressed on

appeal)

(34)

Possible Appeal Issues

• Clinical findings: medical necessity

determinations; inconsistency with LCDs or NCDs (support with experts)

• Discrepancies in denial codes

• Procedural attacks

• Documents were provided but ignored

(35)

Possible Appeal Issues

• Accuracy of sample selection,

methodology and error rate (was sample representative of claims)

• Validity of universe (e.g., did ZPIC draw claims based only on length of stay >180 days but extrapolate against all claims

(36)

San Diego Hospice & Palliative Care:

ZPIC Audit

• February 2011 – Notice of PSC/ZPIC audit

• Shortly after notification, 8 investigators arrive and investigate for five days

• Take sampling of patient documents

• Require Hospice to submit documentation for every patient admitted

(37)

San Diego Hospice & Palliative

Care: ZPIC Audit

• Placed on prepayment review

• Audit continues after prepayment suspension is lifted

• Feb 4, 2013: files for bankruptcy

anticipating multi-million dollar payback

• Feb. 12, 2013: announces closure

• Feb. 20, 2013: whistleblower lawsuit unsealed

(38)

San Diego Hospice & Palliative Care

(per False Claims Act Complaint)

• Employee expresses concerns about

admission and retention of non-terminally ill patients in 2009 and 2010

• Jan. 10, 2011 - employee terminated for

“disagreement with philosophy of admission criteria”

• Feb. 2011– employee contacts state Dept. of Human Services and is encouraged to

(39)

San Diego Hospice & Palliative Care

(per False Claims Act Complaint)

• March 24, 2011 -- ex-employee submits letter

• Jan. 2012 -- ex-employee interviewed by FBI

• Dec. 3, 2012 -- ex-employee files whistleblower suit

• Feb. 20, 2013 -- whistleblower suit unsealed

(40)

San Diego Hospice: Whistleblower

Allegations

• “Open Access Policy” - Falsification of records to allow patients to qualify for hospice care

 Admission of patients wishing to prolong life

 Pressure to retain patients whose conditions had improved

 “Creative” manipulation of patient files to meet federal and state regulations

(41)

San Diego Hospice and Palliative

Care

• During audit, Hospice begins closer scrutiny of patient eligibility

• Large number discharged from service

• Staff reduced

(42)
(43)

Compliance Suggestions

• Know your operations, your risks & fraud and abuse insurance coverage terms

(44)

Be Prepared: It is When, Not If…

• Expect to receive governmental contact

• Designate a point person to coordinate response

 Who will receive letters/calls?

 Who will send it up?

 Who will be responsible for ensuring timely response?

(45)

Be Prepared: It is When, Not If…

• Assemble a facility and/or organization

response team – how will you communicate internally and with whom?

• Post a sample copy of request letters with instructions about where each type of letter should go

• Alert front desk/staff responsible for answering phone

(46)

Be Prepared: It is When, Not If…

• Train, train, train . . . . .

• Will staff know what to do if an

investigator wants to interview them?

(47)

If You Receive A

Notification Letter . . .

• Notify your attorney/compliance team

• Review what has been requested

• Gather documents, review and ask for extension if needed

• Scan and number everything produced

• Include cover letter itemizing contents

• Send certified mail

(48)
(49)

ZPICs and Websites

ZPIC Website ZONE STATES IN ZONE

Safeguard Services http://www.safeguard-servicesllc.com/default.asp

1 California, Hawaii, Nevada, American Samoa, Guam, and the Mariana Islands

AdvanceMed http://www.nciinc.com/about-us/advancemed/

2 Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Utah, Arizona, Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Iowa, Missouri, Alaska

Cahaba http://cahabasafeguard.com/ 3 Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky

Health Integrity http://www.healthintegrity.org/ 4 Colorado, New Mexico, Texas, and Oklahoma AdvanceMed

http://www.nciinc.com/about-us/advancemed/

5 Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia

Under Protest 6 Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware, Maryland, D.C., New Jersey, Massachusetts, New Hampshire,

Vermont, Maine, Rhode Island, Connecticut

(50)

QUESTIONS????

Paula G. Sanders, Esquire [email protected]

(717) 612-6027 Post & Schell, P.C.

17 North Second Street, 12th Floor Harrisburg, PA 17101

References

Related documents

Within the European Project Semester (EPS) program at Escola Politècnica Superior d'Enginyeria de Vilanova i la Geltrú (EPSEVG), a team of students was working together

However it is often argued that length of stay (LOS), mortality and hospitalisation costs are primarily determined by the patient’s medical condition rather than malnutrition.

Fragile textiles or drawings can be stored in a space efficient and safe way in oversized drawers with a large, flat surface area. To avoid damage it is possible to remove the

As stated in the Corporate Governance Principles and also the Transmile Group Berhas’s annual report that the responsibilities of the BOD included overseeing and monitoring

Nine out of India’s 15 PTAs are labelled as free trade agreements (or a combination of an FTA in goods and economic integration agreements [EIA] in services) thus signalling

• Falsely certifying that medical procedures were medically nec- essary or that federal laws such as Stark were complied with in order to obtain federal health program payments,

Notably, we identified a likely progenitor of a lineage of elements that includes a disease-causing L1 insertion (L1RP) [Kimberland et al., 1999; Schwahn et al., 1998] and

including the availability of palliative care and hospice care board - 47.. There is established in the Department of Health the 4. Palliative Care and Hospice Care