Hospices Under the Microscope:
Are You Prepared for ZPICs?
Paula G. Sanders, Esquire Principal & Chair Health Care Practice
Post & Schell, PC Chubb Health Care Webinar April 2, 2013
Objectives
• Understand how ZPICs differ from other audits
• Discuss how a ZPIC audit unfolds
• Evaluate your risks and potential exposures
Medicare Integrity Programs
• Regional Home Health Intermediary (RHHI)
• Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) (Replacing fiscal intermediaries and carriers)
Medicare Integrity Programs
• Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs)
• Program Safeguard Contractors (PSCs)
• Zone Program Integrity Contractors (ZPICs)
• Medicare Prescription Drug Integrity Contractors (MEDICs)
• Quality Improvement Organizations (QIOs)
Fraud or Abuse?
• Fraud: intentional deception or
misrepresentation of facts for purpose of gaining an otherwise unauthorized benefit
• Abuse: actions that are inconsistent with accepted, sound medical or business
practices
Directly or indirectly results in unnecessary costs
Zone Program Integrity Contractors
(ZPICs)
• Consolidation of PSCs and MEDICs
• Coordination of claims processing and benefit integrity activities
• Ensure integrity of ALL Medicare-related claims
Parts A, B, C, D, Home Health, DME, Hospice and coordination of Medi-Medi data matches
ZPIC Function: Identify FRAUD
• Primary goal: investigate instances of suspected fraud, waste and abuse
NOT RANDOM
• Identify need for CMS administrative actions
Payment suspensions, prepayment edits or auto-denial edits
ZPIC Responsibilities
• Regional Medicare data analysis
• Fraud case development
• Fraud complaint processing & resolution
• Provider education related to fraud investigations
• Ability to initiate payment suspensions and provider exclusions
Possible Sources of ZPIC Cases
• Referrals from MACs
Suspected fraudulent or abusive
situations or patterns (data analysis)
• Complaints from beneficiaries, other providers or whistleblowers
• Office of Inspector General (OIG) Hotline
ZPIC Investigative Authority
• Not required to give notice
• Request medical records & documentation
No limit to record requests
No defined look-back period
• Conduct on-site visits and interviews of employees & beneficiaries
• Use probe sampling, statistical sampling & extrapolation
Use of Statistical Sampling for
Overpayment Estimation
• A Medicare contractor may not use
extrapolation to determine overpayment amounts . . . . unless . . .
There is a “sustained or high level of payment error;” or
Documented educational intervention has failed to correct the payment error
Extrapolation
• No CMS guidance regarding “high error rate”
• ZPIC must give notice of extrapolation
unless part of law enforcement investigation
• Extrapolate findings of sample to universe of claims for specified period
• Result: substantial overpayment determinations
ZPIC Sanction Authority
• Suspend or withhold payments
• Determine & collect overpayments
• Refer for exclusion from Medicare
• Refer cases to law enforcement
• Grounds for possible revocation
Violation of provider agreement
Challenging ZPIC Findings
• No appeal of payment suspensions
• Appeal overpayment demands through Medicare Administrative Appeal process
• Five levels of appeal
• Lengthy process
May only halt recoupment through second level
ZPIC Appeal Levels
1. Redetermination: MAC
2. Reconsideration: Qualified Independent Contractor (QIC)
3. Request for Hearing: Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)
4. Review of ALJ Decision: Medicare Appeals Council (MAC)
Target Areas for Hospice Claims
• Election statements
• Certifications of terminal illness
Patients ineligible for hospice care
• Eligibility and long lengths of stay
• Residence of patients: nursing homes (SNFs), assisted living facilities (ALFs), boarding homes
• Terminal diagnosis
Target Areas for Hospice Claims
• Poor documentation
• Inappropriate general inpatient care claims
• Inappropriate continuous care claims
• Duplicate drug claims
• Overlapping Part A claims (hospital, SNF)
Target Areas: Hospice Utilization in
SNFs (OIG Work Plan 2011)
• Data mining: Hospice Medicare A claims and MDS
• Characteristics of nursing facilities with high hospice utilization
Prior report: 82% of SNF/hospice claims did not meet coverage requirements
• Incentives to admit patients likely to have long stays
ZPIC Letters
• Identifies ZPIC authority to “conduct reviews of activities of providers…including medical utilization review and fraud review”
• “Please return the requested information …within (15)(30) days. Failure to comply …may result in exclusion … and/or
suspension of payment [without notice], payment denial or declaration of
ZPIC Letters--Extrapolation
• “Please note failure to furnish this
information shall result in the cancellation of all relevant claims. . . . Any
overpayment determined by us may be projected by extrapolating from the actual overpayment to the entire universe.”
ZPIC Letters: Notice of On-Site
Visit
• Hand-delivered at time of visit
• “On [Date] an on-site inspection and
interviews of facility staff will be conducted by six (6) representatives from this office. At that time you will be asked to produce approximately thirty-six (36) patients’
records (Attachment A) and financial records (Attachment B).”
Types of Information Requested
• All contracts and agreements with
physicians, pharmacies, SNFs, ALFs, boarding homes
• List of all current and former employees
Name, job title, date of birth, address,
phone number, date of hire/termination or resignation
Types of Information Requested
• 1099 or W2 statements for owners,
managers, directors and medical directors
• Payrolls: independent contractors and
regular employees with title and contact info
• 1099 statements for vendors
• Policies and procedures
Types of Information Requested
• Check registers, wire transfer registers, financial ledgers
• Name and number of Compliance Officer
• Contracts for accounting, management, financial consulting, bookkeeping
• “On the cover letter, please list the name and contact information for the person
Types of Patient Information
Requested
• Medical records for beneficiaries and dates of service as shown on attached spreadsheet
• Unduplicated list of beneficiaries
Place of service address, phone number, dates of admission & death, discharge or revocation, primary nurse
Time Frames for Submitting
Documents
• Prepayment review: 30 calendar days of request, no extensions
Claims denied if documents not received by day 45
• Post payment review: 30 calendar days of request, extensions discretionary
Hypothetical Case Study: Hospice
for the Debilitated
• Primary diagnosis for 69% of patients is debility, highest in the region
• ZPIC identifies this as an “outlier”
• ZPIC requests 30 medical records
• Files sent do not contain signed notice of election forms (100% error rate)
Hypothetical Case Study: Hospice
for the Debilitated
• 100% error rate for sample claims reviewed: $51,679.19
• “High error rate” allows ZPIC to extrapolate to all claims that had been paid during
period under review
$51,679.19 becomes
Hypothetical Case Study: Hospice for
the Debilitated--#1 (no regulatory
counsel)
• Hospice discovers that medical records clerk did not copy the notices of election
• Records were sent but not copied
• Hospice signed certification statement attesting to completeness of document production
• Called regulatory counsel upon notice of overpayment
Hypothetical Case Study: Hospice
for the Debilitated--#2 (with
regulatory counsel)
• Hospice bate-stamped all documents and did not sign certification statement
• Upon review of ZPIC findings, hospice re-reviews documents sent and locates 15 of the “missing” elections, as well as 10 more that were not sent (will be addressed on
appeal)
Possible Appeal Issues
• Clinical findings: medical necessity
determinations; inconsistency with LCDs or NCDs (support with experts)
• Discrepancies in denial codes
• Procedural attacks
• Documents were provided but ignored
Possible Appeal Issues
• Accuracy of sample selection,
methodology and error rate (was sample representative of claims)
• Validity of universe (e.g., did ZPIC draw claims based only on length of stay >180 days but extrapolate against all claims
San Diego Hospice & Palliative Care:
ZPIC Audit
• February 2011 – Notice of PSC/ZPIC audit
• Shortly after notification, 8 investigators arrive and investigate for five days
• Take sampling of patient documents
• Require Hospice to submit documentation for every patient admitted
San Diego Hospice & Palliative
Care: ZPIC Audit
• Placed on prepayment review
• Audit continues after prepayment suspension is lifted
• Feb 4, 2013: files for bankruptcy
anticipating multi-million dollar payback
• Feb. 12, 2013: announces closure
• Feb. 20, 2013: whistleblower lawsuit unsealed
San Diego Hospice & Palliative Care
(per False Claims Act Complaint)
• Employee expresses concerns about
admission and retention of non-terminally ill patients in 2009 and 2010
• Jan. 10, 2011 - employee terminated for
“disagreement with philosophy of admission criteria”
• Feb. 2011– employee contacts state Dept. of Human Services and is encouraged to
San Diego Hospice & Palliative Care
(per False Claims Act Complaint)
• March 24, 2011 -- ex-employee submits letter
• Jan. 2012 -- ex-employee interviewed by FBI
• Dec. 3, 2012 -- ex-employee files whistleblower suit
• Feb. 20, 2013 -- whistleblower suit unsealed
San Diego Hospice: Whistleblower
Allegations
• “Open Access Policy” - Falsification of records to allow patients to qualify for hospice care
Admission of patients wishing to prolong life
Pressure to retain patients whose conditions had improved
“Creative” manipulation of patient files to meet federal and state regulations
San Diego Hospice and Palliative
Care
• During audit, Hospice begins closer scrutiny of patient eligibility
• Large number discharged from service
• Staff reduced
Compliance Suggestions
• Know your operations, your risks & fraud and abuse insurance coverage terms
Be Prepared: It is When, Not If…
• Expect to receive governmental contact
• Designate a point person to coordinate response
Who will receive letters/calls?
Who will send it up?
Who will be responsible for ensuring timely response?
Be Prepared: It is When, Not If…
• Assemble a facility and/or organizationresponse team – how will you communicate internally and with whom?
• Post a sample copy of request letters with instructions about where each type of letter should go
• Alert front desk/staff responsible for answering phone
Be Prepared: It is When, Not If…
• Train, train, train . . . . .
• Will staff know what to do if an
investigator wants to interview them?
If You Receive A
Notification Letter . . .
• Notify your attorney/compliance team
• Review what has been requested
• Gather documents, review and ask for extension if needed
• Scan and number everything produced
• Include cover letter itemizing contents
• Send certified mail
ZPICs and Websites
ZPIC Website ZONE STATES IN ZONE
Safeguard Services http://www.safeguard-servicesllc.com/default.asp
1 California, Hawaii, Nevada, American Samoa, Guam, and the Mariana Islands
AdvanceMed http://www.nciinc.com/about-us/advancemed/
2 Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Utah, Arizona, Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Iowa, Missouri, Alaska
Cahaba http://cahabasafeguard.com/ 3 Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky
Health Integrity http://www.healthintegrity.org/ 4 Colorado, New Mexico, Texas, and Oklahoma AdvanceMed
http://www.nciinc.com/about-us/advancemed/
5 Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia
Under Protest 6 Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware, Maryland, D.C., New Jersey, Massachusetts, New Hampshire,
Vermont, Maine, Rhode Island, Connecticut
QUESTIONS????
Paula G. Sanders, Esquire [email protected]
(717) 612-6027 Post & Schell, P.C.
17 North Second Street, 12th Floor Harrisburg, PA 17101