.•. a lecture
b
y
EUGENE
B
URGER
]
- - ~)"n ' . "..',
A
'/'"
. / . : t , (1) PRESENTATIONThe great danger in 1i steni ng to 1ectures
is that we are only listening to words, only
listening to the other fellow talk and show his
magic, and not making any real progress of our
own -- and that, after all, is what is
impor-tant; making my own progress toward ... what?
What are my goals?
What am I seeking to accomplish? What results do I wish to attain?
If the goal of performing (whether on the
trapeze, the guitar, or with a pack of trained
seals) is to entertain people, the goal of
magical performers ought to be to entertain them
through deception. Notice that the word
"enter-tain" comes before the word "deception.II This
isn1t simply a trick of sentence construction or
a play on words; it points to a primary fact
recognized by almost all magicians who earn
their entire "living" (meaning "moneyll ... hnmn
••• ) performing magic.
Close-up magic as performed by many
ama-teurs is deceptive but not very entertaining.
Energy has been put into constructing the decep-tion, but not enough energy and thought and work
has been put into constructing an entertaining
eresentation within which they might, as we say,
cloak the hoax.1I
And, hoaxes, I submit, really ought to be
cloaked with something.
-ItIS more fun that way! Not only for your
audiences but, hopefully, for you. Persentation
is that poi nt where you put .YQii'rse1f into your magi c.
Even if your presentations tend toward the "Now I'm going to do this; now I am going to do that" format, your lines must be rehearsed and
spoken as i f you were saying something
impor-tant -- something worth the spectator's time and attention.
Consequently, the style of close-up
presen-tation which I personally least enjoy is one
which we see all too often -- and which might be
called: "11
m doing this as a throw-away so that
if you catch me it won't be such a big deal.1I
I
enjoy thi s least because (among other reasons)
when one sees i t , it does not appea r to ha ve
been so much consciously chosen by the performer but, rather, to be the inevitable result of too
little rehearsal. According to IIBurger's First
Law: II Too many performers practice the moves
but forget to rehearse the show!
-You must practice the parts and rehearse
the whole. You must practice the moves, the
sleights, the various physical maneuvers until
your fingers can do them smoothly and without
awkwa rdne s
s,
Now you've learned the trick -- and the
work (and, hopefully, the fun) is about to
beQTn.
If one is a silent performer, the trick
generally must now be choreographed to musiC; if one is a speaking performer, the trick must now
be choreographed to what you wi 11 ~ (your
4
-•
script). Expecting to be "inspired :''' the spot"
regarding your script shows very little ~espect
for your audences!
Much lik: a dance or a dramatic play, the
close-up mag' cal performer's movements and
act ions are choreographed to the words he wi11
use in performance. And it is this which needs
to be rehearsed. This interaction of the
per-former's actions and handling of his prODS on
the one hand and his words on the other ~- and
the surprises which are thereby generated -- is
the show. Agai n, the show must be rehearsed':""
Of course, the close-up performer's script needs to be flexible and open rather than rigid
and closed. This is required because of the
intimacy of the performing situation wherein
spectators often will talk to each other and to
you. In t he context of such i nt i macy, I ha ve
found the following to be a helpful rule of
thumb: If you expect spectators to be attentive
to you, you must, in turn, be attentive to them. Close-up performers need to listen to what their spectators are saying -- so they can respond to them.
One eveni og I went on a tour of a few of
Chi cago' s many magic spots with my fri end and
former partner in the Spirit Theatre Company,
Denni s Rook. Afterward, Denni s remarked: Quite
a few of the magicians we saw tonight related to audiences as if they were only technical neces-sities -- needed to select cards, remember them
and say IGreat job!' to the performer at th~
finish. 1I
How true. Yet much of the fun of close-up
mag;c for spectators is that ; t ; s close-up __
-Play with them. Have fun yourself.
But lest you think 11
m preaching, let me say that I'm only telling you how I approach my
own work. I agree with leo Buscagl i a when he
said: "Beware of giving advice. Wise men don't
need it and fools won't heed it."
Allowing the spotlight to drift occasional-ly to a spectator (when this is not done for
purposes of humiliation and/or embarrassment)
is not only gracious, it is theatrically wise.
We ar~ creating a magical context of mystery and
fun and surpri se and play and, in thi s
con-text, audience involvement can enhance your
presentation and deepen the impact you have as a performer.
and that they may, therefore, participate all
the more fully in what is happening.
People enjoy getting involved. They want
thi s to be fun. They mi ght even talk and 1augh
and joke with you.
Don
vt
give them dirty looks. And, pleasedon It treat them as if they were "hecklers!"
(How aWful!}
(2) TOP CHANGE
I was taught this effect, step-by-step.
when I was sixteen or seventeen years old by
Alex Berecz , a magician-bartender at Dix and
Norb's Magic Inn. a Chicago magic bar popular in
the 1950's. Because the effect is little more
than theatrical dressing around a top change --a sleight which I --assumed w--as terribly difficult to execute -- I consequently made hard work of
the lessons. Alex, however, was a patient
teacher and slowly got me to
see
that what isimportant here -- and what makes it all
decep-ti ve -- is not primariIy what your hands and
fingers are doing, but the situation you are
creat i ng through your words. your eyes, your
gestures. and your interactions with your
audi-ence. Once thi s i s rea1i zed, the top change
rather does itself -- and you just help it
a long.
I confess thi s i s one of the cornerstone
effects in my card work for laymen. I perform
it all the time. It allows me to get peoplets
names and talk with them. I perform the effect
sitting at a table, standing behind a bar, or
standi ng in the mi ddl e of a cocktai1 party or
hospitality suite with spectators completely
surrounding me. People simply will not see the
exchange of the cards if their attention is on the two spectators who are in the spotlight. Yet the exchange is done boldly -- right under their
noses. Perhaps this is why I like it.
*
*
*
Routine
"Do you ever do card tricks?" I ask a
spec-tator on my ri ght. Go with the answer. "We11 ,
6
9
-I hold the card so that it faces John and
look
at
Mary
and say somewhat
triumphantly,
"Wouldn't l't""be amazing
ifJohn did find your
card?"
Mary usually admits thatlt would be
amazing.
I tip the card back so that I can see its
face.
fl\yright hand continues moving -- and
crosses over to show the card to Mary.
Before
Mary can say anything, I say:
"You picked the
four of Hearts (or whatever) ••• "
My right hand
immediately (but not quickly) moves back so that
it is held about seven or eight inches in front
of my body -- and about waist high.
At this
point, I am looking Mary directly in the eyes
--as
I
continue
the
last
sentence,
"...
and
that's exactly the card at which John stopped!"
It is during these final words that the top
change is executed.
As I say these last words,
my left hand crosses in front of my right,
con-tinues its movement and finishes pointing
dir-ectly at John -- as if for emphasis.
Duringthe
crossover, the exchange is done.
The left thumb
pushes the top selected card about one-half inch
to the right.
The card in the ri ght hand is
held between the thumb and fi rst finger. The
first
and second fingers
of
the
right hand
separate so that the selected card can be fed
between them by the left thumb.
The left thumb
immediately lifts slightly upward so that the
card in the right hand can be taken onto the top
of the deck.
AND THE HAND KEEPS MOVING until it
comes to a stop -- pointing at John for
em-phasis.
this is a card trick that you will do.
May I
ask your name?"
---Spectator replies his name is John.
"Well,
Jobn, I hope you're lucky tonight."
Turning to a spectator on my left, I ask
her name.
She replies it is Mary.
UMary, I
want you to select one of these cards.
Show it
to everyone except John and me.
Now, John,
don't peek!
We're all watching you!"
(Indeed!
If everyone continues watching John and Mary, if
you continue to keep them in the spotlight, no
one wi 11
~see the exchange!)
Mary
shows her card and replaces it 1n the
deck.
I maintain a break above the card with
~left fourth finger.
"John, tell
us the truth:
Did you see
Mary's card?"
As everyone looks at John for his
reply,
I execute a pass which brings the
se-lected card to the top. Alternatively, if one of
the spectators is staring unmercifully at the
deck, I will "absent mindedly" double undercut
the card to the top.
This needs to be done as
if it has no bearing whatever on the proceedings
-- and without shame or guilt.
I turn toward John and slowly riffle the
cards.
"I'll do that again and you say 'Stop!'
wherever you 1ike. "
If I feel playful, I might riffle the deck
so rapidly that
itis finished before he says
anythi ng at all.
"Thi sis a motor skill:
You
must coordinate with me!"
The point
ts that I
play with the spectators here and keep it light.
John finally succeeds in stopping me and I take
the card in my right hand -- keeping the deck in
my left.
8
-One other point:
made, the left hand, in
toward John, moves more
stops, pointing at John.
Once the exchange is
continuing its movement
sharply upward until it
The whole routine needs to be rehearsed --from beg; nni ng to end. The words which you are us; ng for the exchange must fit into the frame-work of the rest of the script you a~e usinq,
During rehearsal t talk out loud to lmaglnary
spectators.
During per-f'ormance , I am seeking to have fun with John and Mary and the other specta-tors -- and I wi 11 allow the situation to de-velop as it wi 11 -- knowing that I can always get back "on track" with my script. Remember, the reactions and responses which you are able to elicit from John and Mary greatly enhance the show. The magical change of the cards is but the "topper" to the situation -- John's. atte~t ing to find Mary's card -- a
sttuat ton
WhlCh should be fun and entertaining in and of itself. Mary may get a bit confused and look toothers for support as she tells me that this was not her card.
I tell John that I am a little disappointed with his card trick -- and then ask him to blow on the card. I turn it over and show that it has changed to Mary's card.
Once the surprise has begun to subside, I repeat the exchange as follows. I look at Mary, smile, and say, ItYou didn't think that John
could do it, did you?1t As these words are begun, the right hand (with the card) gestures for emphasis toward Mary. When I get to the name "John- in the script, the left hand is moving to point to John -- and the card is exchanged in the process.
-Here, John, blow on it again. 1t I look at Mary and turn the card over -- showing it has now changed back to the first card -- and say, -You see, itls never what you think!" I give the card to Mary so that she can touch it --and, in the process, see that it is not prepared (Which, interestingly, is often suspected by spectators).
Notes
I want to discuss this effect not only because it has a very hi gh impact upon laymen but also because it shows us what we need to practice and what we need to rehearse. The physi ca
1
act i on of the exchange of the two cards needs to be practiced -- repeated over and over and over unti 1 it can be done smoothly andef-fortlessly, without strain. •
- 10 - ~
*
*
11
-*
(3) BRAIN-WAVED
Why another version of the Brainwave Deck? Certainly any self-respecting magician ought to
be satisfied with the original Vernon version
or, shou 1d he for some reason prefer a
face-down card appearing in a face-up pack, Joe
Berg's Ultra Mental Deck.
Performing as I do in public places where
both local and visiting magicians often drop in
to see a little magic, it appealed to me to
develop a version wherein both sides of the deck
coul d be di sp 1ayed at tfl'eTi ni she Thi s has
caused quite a few magical mouths to drop open
-- as magicians suddenly realized they were
not seeing one of these now-standard packs.
And, that is exact ly what I wanted (perverse
soul that I can sometimes be!). It is great
fun to have a few effects in your repertoi re
that are "maqi ca 1 traps for magi ci ans" because
magicians, generally, deeply enjoy being fooled.
It is unwise, of cour se , to gear your entire
repertoire toward magicians because, according
to "BurgerIs Second Law:" Laymen tend to
re-member what they
1
i"fe about your show whilemagicians tend to remember what they donlt like. Gearing your work to magicians, then, is a
los-ing battle. (And we hevent even begun to talk
about magicians as "tippers" in a restaurant
or lounge!)
The routine I am about to describe is based upon three points which, I think, are
indepen-dently interesting. Ffr st , audiences do not
kt10w what you intend to do until the ending is
revealed. This is why multiple-out effects have
the impact they do: The spectator does not know
12
-II
what the "e ndi ng" is supposed to be and so any
one of a set of endi ngs can be introduced as
IIthell
endi ng. Second~ when descri bi ng effects
afterward, spectators notoriously misremember
details. I have very often heard this effect
described by spectators to their friends as: "I
named a card and it was reversed in the deck I was holding!" -- which, as you will see, is not
what happens. But it IS the effect which the
spectator believes he saW-me perform.
Third, if asked to name onels favorite card
suit, the overwhelming choice will be "Hearts."
A fairly strong second plaae choice is "Spades."
Women, to a much 1esser degree, wi 11 somet i mes
smil e and say "0; amondsII - - perhaps rememberi ng
that "Diamonds are a girlls best friend."
"C'lubs " is named very rarely. If you ask where I
have di scovered such curi ous secrets about the
human psyche, my answer is that I have simply
asked this question of hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of persons over the past few years and this is what I have discovered.
Consequently, this deck is designed to
exhibit three suits: Hearts, Spades, and
Dia-monds. If C1 ubs is named at the begi nning, I
immediately fan the deck, ask that a Club be
selected, and go into another effect -- most
often my version-of Matt Schulien's Card in the
Matchbook. At the conclusion of this effect, I
ask that another suit be named and the choice
is now between the suits which the deck can
display. This is, to be sure, a detour -- and
one which may disappoint magicians because of
its apparent 1ad of di rectness. It does not
trouble me, however, because I equally enjoy
performing the Card in the Matchbook and because
-this lack of directness is perceivable only by
the performer. The spectator has no sense of
what is going to happen.
He
does not perceive adetour at all -- or. more precisely. he will
not perceive a detour unless the magician is
unable to hide his own disappointment over the spectator's choice!
---The pack consists of 24 double-back cards
and 24 double-face cards. (The application of
double-face and double-back cards to the
Brain-wav~ Deck. though in another form, was something
I f trst read about in Sam Dalal's excellent but
short-lived magazine. Swami.)
The double-face cards are as follows (read
across the columns for order of double-face
cards in the deck): 20 - JC 50 - 9C. 90 - 2C 3S - 7C 6S - AD IDS -
QD
4H - JD
8H - AH 3D - AC 60 - KD 100 - 6C4S - QH
8S - QC 2H - 3C 5H - 5C 9H - KH 40 - 4C 8D - JS2S - JH
S:;(5 - 7H 9S - 7S 3H -QD
6H - AS 10H - 70.top of the deck down we have: 8C, KS, DB~ OF
(20 up), DB, OF (3D up),
et
c; , ending with theunprepared KC and 10C on the face of the pack. Using a razor blade, scratch the backs of the double-back cards which are roughed to the
20. 25, and 2H on the upper 1eft and lower
ri ght hand corners. These wi11 be your gui des
as you run through the deck, faces toward the
audi ence. The gui de cards wi11 tell you where
each suit begins (and so each suit should be
marked differently). You then count from the
guide card to the number selected -- remembering
to omit the number "seven" which is not used. I
confess my deck has marks on the 6's as well
since I prefer to do even less counting!
Using transparent tape, put a small tab on
the bottom of the 65 - AD -- about one-fourth
inch in length. This will be used as a guide
for cutting the deck should the final choice be
either the 2, 3. 4, or 5 of Diamonds or the 6,
8, 9, or 10 of Hearts. The cards are simply cut
at the tab once the deck is removed from its
case. The reason for the cutting is to bring
the chosen card more near the center of the pack for its final display.
Since no standard double-face cards are so backed, you will either have to spend some time
splitting cards or engage someone to do it for
you. Neil lester (of Cards by Martin) made my
deck for me.
~he card are roughed together in pa irs:
One stde of a double-back card is roughed along
with the Diamond, Spade and Heart sides of the
double-face cards. The four unused cards (8C
KS,
Ke,
and 10C) are placed on the top and bot:tom of the deck respectively. Thus from the
14
-Routine
The pack in its case is given to a specta-tor several effects before I intend to use it --with the instructions that it is something we'll use later and to put it into his pocket.
"Do you have a favorite card suit?" I ask. Assuming the spectator replies "Hearts" (or
"Spades" or "Diamonds"), I continue: "let's
look at this idea we call luck. Lives have been
15
----~---changed and, at least in Las Vegas and Atlantic City, vacations have been ruined because of it. In a moment, I want you to callout a number between one and ten -- but so that later people won't think you made it too easy for me, don't call out the number "seven" as this is most always called. So... call out a number."
The spectator replies, ItFive."
To the spectator with the deck, "Sone time ago I gave you a pack of playing cards which I asked you to place in your pocket. Would you take them out and hand them to thi s gentleman (who made the selections). Sir, please hold the deck up. This deck of cards was gi ven to me by a man I once met, an old gambler. He had spent several hours using this deck to deal the most wonderful poker hands -- royal flushes and all of it -- and at the end of his demonstration he gave the deck to me, no doubt to prove to me that what I had been witnessing was the result of real skill on his part. He said that he hoped the cards would bring me luck. It
To the first spectator: "Do you believe in 1uck1" If the answer is "Yes," I say, IIWonder-fu1!" If the reply is "No,1I I say, IIWell ... I certainly hope that you're lucky tonight!" It You see, when I fi rst looked through the deck after the gambler gave it to me, I was sur-prised to discover one card was reversed -- up-side down -- in the pack. An accident ••• per-haps ... or one of the gambler's secrets. I simply left the card reversed ••• where it is right now ••• to see how lucky people really can be. I wonder ... do you thi nk that you are lucky?1t
16
-Aga in, go wi th the spectator's response. Then continue: ItLet us see. You named the suit
'Hearts' and the number 'five'."
The cards are taken from the spectator, removed from the case, not cut at the tab be-cause of the card chosen, and slowly spread with their faces toward the audience. Watch for the Heart guide card and then count to the five and spread the roughed-together cards apart. A face-down card appears to the spectators. In fact, it is the double-backed card. Right next to it, faci ng you, is the fi ve of Hearts. The fanned deck is turned around and the five is displayed and removed. Finish!
Notes
If you are worried about an Ace (the number "one") being selected (this will not happen, since you asked for a number between one and ten), you can place four Aces in your breast pocket in CHaSeD order from the front of the pocket to the back. Thus you are able to pro-duce any of the Aces from your pocket as if this were the effect. Another spectator can then be asked to name another number between one and ten and you can proceed into the effect. This perhaps seems complicated in print but, in prac-tice, it is really quite simple and appears to be direct.
On the very rare occasions when I present a stand-up performance before a large group of (seated) persons, I generally present this ef-fect but I use a different way of gett i ng into it which eliminates the possibility of the first detour (necessitated by a selection of "Cl ubs"},
17
--I 'begi n by handi ng out the deck. Then I. show four jumbo Aces -- one of each of the SUltS :-and propose an experiment in telepathy wheretn
I will mentally attempt to send the name of one of the card suits to the audience as a whole. If you don't play this as comedy and if you keep the pace moving, audiences seem thoroughly to enjoy such excursions into parapsycholog~cal Woo-Woo. People enjoy guessing and being rlght ~nd
raising their hands and showing off. (Just llke
~!)
(4) BRAIN-WAVED AGAIN
Thi s i s such a strong effect -- a named card found reversed in the pack -- and, here, the effect is the same but the method is differ-ent. No double-face or double-back cards are required. The "miracle- has its price, however, especially if you are squeaonsb about multiple-outs and thinking on your feet. Just remember, "thinking on your feet" is made easy by thinking i n rehearsal.
I ask someone to mi x the Aces and then return them to me. I fan them so that neither the audience nor I can see any of their faces --and then select one, apparently at r--andom. Ac~
ually, the backs of the cards are marked and f
t
is an easy matter to select the Ace of Clubs. I look at it and attempt mentally to send it to the audience. I ask how many persons thought of "Spades?" I ask them to raise their hands. Then "Hearts" and then "Diamonds" are call-ed out. When I name "Clubs," I turn the card around so everyone can see it -- and, at the same time, scan those who now have thei r hands raised. Picking a likely person near the :ront (for better audi ence vi sibil ity), I ask hl m ~r
her to stand up and cont i nue with the
exper-t-mente I discard the "a1ready used" Ace of ~lubs
(Why not?!) and hand the spectator the remalning three Aces and ask him to mix them thoroughly and then to select one -- stressing the fairness of the choi
ce,
I am now ready to begi n the effect proper without the possibility of a detour.*
*
18
-*
The pack can show one suit only: Hearts. The entire suit of Hearts has been roughed on both sides and then sandwiched between two other cards -- one of which has been roughed on its face and the other roughed on its back. Thus we have groups of threes with the reversed card in the center.
. On the backs of the cards which sandwich the Ace, three, six, nine and Queen, make a small scratch on the upper left and lower right corners -- which will make counting so much easier.
I use two decks. One shows Hearts and the other shows Spades -- the two most frequently named suits. I have used these decks in several ways.
First, I have placed a deck in each of my vest pockets (the Heart pack over the heart --where else?). I ask a person to name his favor-ite card suit. Again, if either Clubs or Dia-monds is named I go into another effect -- with-out flinching! If Hearts or Spades is named (Which will happen in the vast majority of cases), I remove the appropriate deck from my
19
----'-,-can be the first and only Ace which you attempt to send to the audience. It is slilply picked out of the face-down fan by its secret marking. The advantage of thi s pack over the pre-vious one is that it can be made up using a regular deck of cards -- thus making up new decks is an easy matter. Again, with this deck the reversed card can be removed from the pack, back toward the audience, the pack itself turned around, and then the reversed card turned around so it can be seen by the audience -- a far more interest i ng di sp 1ay vi sua lly,
pocket as I say, IIIn a deck of cards there
are thi rteen cards of each suit. Name anyone of them." It's a matter of timing and eye contact. I ask the spectator if he would like to change his mind and name another Heart. I make a game of thi
s,
When the spectator is solid on one named Heart, I remove the deck and spread it faces toward the audience. The cards are separated at the appropriate point. I say: IIOne card is reversed ••• and ~ one card ••• the three of Hearts (or whatever). As I say this, I remove the reversed card (withoutshow-ing its face) and slowly turn the pack ar?und so the other side can be seen -- as I am saYlng, "and only one card. II The card itself is then turned around to reveal it is the very card named!
Second, if I am perfomi ng at a tab 1e , I might place the Heart pack on the table but off to the side. If Hearts is named, I pi ck it up.
If Spades is named, I switch the deck for the Spade deck in a way shown to me by Bruce ~ern
stein, a very clever Chicago performer, WhlCh I am not free to explain. Since the spectators do
not
know what you are going to do, the switching of the decks is not ab1g production -- and can occur on a natural off-beat.Thi rd, standi ng before a group, I use the jumbo (marked) Aces. Fi rst, I hand out. the Heart (or Spade) deck. Then I show the JU'!">o Aces and propose the telepathy experiment wlth the audience. I attempt to transmit one Ace and then another (neither being the Heart). The two remaining cards are g1 yen to the spectato~ and the Ace of Hearts is selected throu-gh a Slmple process of equivoque ( IIWould you hand one of them to me. ") Alternately, the Ace of Hearts
20
-*
*
21
i
(5) WATER SUSPENSION
Laymen often believe, erroneously, that if they are seated close to a magician, they will
have a better opportunity to di scover hi s
se-crets. Whi 1e thi s i s often true, it is by no
means a 1ways the case. Thi s effect, for
ex-ample, is effective precisely because it ~
performed right under the spectator's nose.
Further, it is percei ved by the spectators as
being completely impromptu -- the only proper-ties used are a dollar bill, a rubber band, some water or other liquid, and the performer's
busi-ness card. (You mi ght thi nk thi sis a clever
way to pass out your business cards -- and,
per-haps, it is. Personally, I never give my card
to anyone unless they ask for it. Should I be
asked -- and should there be some 1iquid handy I very often perform this effect.)
The basic effect first came to my attention
in Mi 1bourne Chri stopher's book on the thumb
tip. If you wrap even a newish bill around a
thumb tip and slip a rubber band around it, you
might think the whole thing looks wrong: The
tube thus fonned seems too large -- obvi ously
suggesting to the discerning specta~or th~t
something is inside it. I felt a flnger
!.'!E.
formed a thinner and more believable tube -- and
that is what I use. If you put a small rubber
band around the finger tip and put it in your
pocket, the effect is wonderfully impromptu.
Routine
Ask to borrow a bi 11 -- "the 1arger the
de-nomi nat i on the better." Ask that the bill be
newish (a worn bill would crush under the rubber
22
---~.-...
~~~~--~---~---~---~ - _ . _ - - - _ .
band). The finger tip is alread, on the first
finger of your right hand.
Whi
e the bill isbeing produced by a willing spectator, slip the rubber band off the finger tip and hold it in your left hand.
The bi 11 is received in your ri ght hand,
palm up, and rests on the palm -- thus covering
the tip. The left hand turns the bill over once
or twi ce and then holds up the rubber band as
you say, "Would you trade the bill for this
rubber band?" This question usually takes
folks off guard and you should get many
inter-resting responses with which you can work.
Whatever the answer, hand the rubber band to the spectator with the request that he pull on it (fantasy being what it is, this usually
gets a laugh from the other spectators). While
the attention is thus on the spectator and the
rubber band, form the bill into a tube around
the finger tip -- which 15 illll1ediately removed
before the tube is finally fonned. This takes a
second. 00 it casually -- as if you were just
doing it, just forming a bi 11 into a tube
--withou~getting flushed in the face and
genera-ting your sense of guilt to the audience.
Take the rubber band and slip it around the
tube thus formed: The tip should be near the
top of the tube. (Thi sis the poi nt where you
tell all of your "rolling the dollar bill into a tube" jokes.)
A card is taken and placed on the third and
fourth fi ngers of the 1eft hand. The tube is
placed on top of it and held in place by the
thumb and first finger of the left hand.
-Water is slowly poured into the bill. Just
before I do this I usually say "This is the
reason I didn't want to use
~y
own money!IIStop, let it sink in. Don't be in a hurry.
Slowly ... as if you were doi ng somethi ng
tremendous ••• slowly sl i de the card from under
the bil~ unti~ it is free of contact. If I am
p~rforml.ng thi s behind a bar or near a table, I
wll1 sprn the card onto the surface toward the
spectator.
. If you do thi s as if you were doi ng
some-thlng utterly. unbelievable, you will find that many people wl1l gasp when you remove the card.
. Taking the glass in the right hand, slowly
ratse the tube in the left, pause, and then
slowly pour the water back into the glass. This
very often generates laughter.
Put the glass down -- or hand it to
some-one: Look the spectator right in the eye as you
de l tver the following line: -1'i\r1d-uie most
amazi ng thi ng is that bi11 is not even wet! It
This line covers a multitude of sins -- not the least of which is the steal of the tip from
the tube. But don't even think of it as a
"steal: -- ~tisn't. What I do is simply insert
the thlrd flnger of mY right hand into the tube
(and the tip) as my left hand slips off the
rubber band. I allow the bi 11 to unroll by
i~s~lf.as my hand moves toward the spectator
--flnlshlng about a foot from his face. The left
hand iRlTlediately turns the bi 11 over several
times and hands it back to the spectator -- as
both hands are shown empty (fingers pointing
toward the spect~tor's eyes).
24
-Notes
Don't be in a hurry -- particularly when
you unroll the tube. I have fooled many
magi-cians with this simply because they were looking
for somethi ng on my thumb or fi rst fi nger. The
movement of the right hand toward the spectator, as the left removes the rubber band, is smooth
and unhurried. It's all over before you know
it.
The best kind of glass to use -- since you
don't want the bill to get wet(!) -- is a
cordial glass. Pour slowly but
steadily--until the water is about one-fourth inch from
the top. With his Liquid Pull, Vernet supplies
small plastic glasses which are designed to pour perfectly and which hold an ideal amount to use
with a finger tip. Again, a paper cup is also
fi ne since it can be squeezed togethe r at the top before pouri ng -- and the water wi11 pour straight down (which is what you want).
One 1ast word concerni ng the presentat ion
of this -- and other -- close-up effects. The
greatest failure, it seems to me, is a failure
of the imagination on the part of the performer to i magine that he is rea lly doi ng thi ngs that
are absolutely fantastic and amazing. If the
performer can imagine this to be the case, he is
al ready on hi s way toward communi cating that
energy and wonder to his audience. This little
trick, for instance, really can be played into
something quite marvelous in the perception of laymen -- and, if you do it smoothly, even magi-cians might wonder where the thumb tip went ••••
*
*
-.[ugene believes that the challenge of
per-fO"'lng is to make "that puzzle" into a
fun-filled
and entertaining
romp OR a stunning,
eIIIOtional experience.
His aim
isto have ·only
strong effects· in his repertoire.
How
wellhe has succeeded was attested to by England's
Bob Read after I had taken him to see Eugene
work at a local bistro:
"He's marvelous •
Bobsaid.
·[very item's a closer!
II '*
,
--
Phil
Wi1lmarth
*
*
As an enthusiastic, even unabashed, admirer
of
Eugene's
performing
ability
and
persona,
I am pleased to be able to help bring his notes
to you.
If you have attended this lecture,
no words of mine are needed to tell you about
his ability.
If you have not, I am pleased to
introduce you to a good fri end and wonderful
magician through these notes.
Excelsior!!
Pro-ductions has also published his book
Secrets
and Mysteries of Close-Up Entertaining:
I
com-mend that to your attention also.
I
am
confi-dent that you will enjoy and benefit from
read-ing it just as I am sure you will benefit from
his lecture.
In 1976, Eugene and Erik Counce formed the
Spirit Theatre Company and twenty months later
"Hauntings" debuted.
This powerful and intimate
"psuedo-spt
ri t
IIseance played co
11eges and the
Chicago area Playboy circuit, and is the subject
of a book to be published by Magic Inc. in 1982.
I have seen the show and read the manuscript and
can highly recommend both.
Throughout high school in Chicago and
col-lege in Wisconsin, he was utterly absorbed in
magic.
Then his
interest dropped away, his
subscrtpt tons