• No results found

John Lushetsky, Program Manager US Department of Energy Solar Energy Technology Program

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "John Lushetsky, Program Manager US Department of Energy Solar Energy Technology Program"

Copied!
40
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

International Workshop on Glass for Harvesting, Storage & Efficient Usage of Solar Energy

Needs and Opportunities for Glass in the US DOE Solar

Technology Program

November 17, 2008

John Lushetsky, Program Manager

US Department of Energy

Solar Energy Technology Program

http://www.eere.energy.gov/solar

Email: [email protected]

(2)

Agenda

US Solar Program Overview

Solar Glass Requirements

Market Dynamics

(3)

Agenda

US Solar Program Overview

Solar Glass Requirements

Market Dynamics

(4)

The mission of DOE’s Solar Program is to

Accelerate

the wide-spread adoption of solar electric

technologies across the United States

Market Transformation

Grid Integration

Market Transformation

Grid Integration

Photovoltaics (PV)

Concentrating Solar Power (CSP)

Distributed Generation on-site or near point of use

Centralized Generation large users or utilities

DOE

SETP

DOE

DOE

SETP

SETP

(5)

Funding for the SETP has been increased in response

the Solar America Initiative

0 50 100 150 200 250

FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09*

Bu d g et ($ M )

Concentrating Solar Power Photovoltaic Energy Systems

Solar Energy Technologies Funding, FY01 – FY09*

*President’s request for FY09 was $150M, current House mark is $220M, current Senate mark is $229M.

Solar America Initiative Announced by President

(6)

The SETP has slightly increased funding to industry in

response to the Solar America Initiative

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09*

National Labs Industry

Solar Energy Technologies Funding, FY01 – FY09*

(7)

NREL and SNL provide a strong base for solar

development partnerships with industry

Over 200 scientists and engineers with deep

understanding of all solar technologies

Areas of expertise

Crystalline silicon and thin-film PV

Flat-plate and concentrator PV

Process development and engineering

System development and testing

Measurement and characterization

Reliability engineering

Next-generation PV technologies

CSP components and testing

Grid integration and power electronics

Collaboration Types

Cooperative R&D Agreements (CRADA)

Work-for-Others

Technical Service Agreements

Technology Licensing

(8)

SETP is structured to work along the whole RDD&D

pipeline

(9)

SETP is sponsoring a number of industry led efforts to

accelerate the development of solar technologies

(10)

DOE’s industry R&D programs include diverse

technologies for potentially diverse PV markets

Second round of PV incubators announced September 26

th

, 2008

Currently conducting stage gate reviews for TPP projects

(11)

11

DOE’s Next Generation PV seeds the beginning of the

(12)

FY2008 PV funding across all programs and including

national labs

(13)

Point Focus

Improve engine reliability and system manufacturability, and

develop next-generation dish system designs. Test new tower

receiver panel.

Line Focus

Optimize receiver and concentrator designs for higher temps,

increase component suppliers, and create advanced evaluation

capabilities.

Storage

Develop advanced heat transfer fluids for more efficient

operation at high temperatures, and test innovative

designs for low-cost storage using sensible and latent heat

options .

R&D is targeting technical obstacles in CSP systems to

improve performance and reduce costs

(14)

First Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA 1) is in stage gate review

FOA 2 awardees were announced September 2008

Third CSP FOA anticipated for March 2009

CSP Technology Projects Storage R&D Projects Storage Demo Projects

DOE funds CSP Industry R&D to reduce system costs

(15)

Agenda

US Solar Program Overview

Solar Glass Requirements

Market Dynamics

(16)

Glass needs for Photovoltaics

Increased strength to weight (thickness) to permit larger thin film

module size

Applied Materials Gen 8 thin film silicon modules

Improved TCO’s

Improve device efficiency by minimizing optical and electrical loss

Improve device stability

Control interfacial properties

Have improved surface properties, processibility, work function etc.

Be enabling for 3rd generation approaches

Textured glass needed for improved light capture

Thin wafered silicon and single crystal thin film silicon

Anti-soiling and hardness coatings

(17)

Use of TCO in Photovoltaics

DOE is funding $1M cross-cutting research for TCO’s for different PV

technologies through NREL

TC Material Specific PV Technology Areas (Roadmaps)

WSi FSi CPV CdTe CIGS OPV

In-Zn-O X X X X Zn-O:Ga/ZnO X X X X X X Zn-Sn-O X X Cu-Zn-O X X X In-Sn-O X X X X In-Ti-O X X X

c-Si p-type TEXTURED

ITO

Intrinsic a-Si:H FRONT METAL GRID

FULL AREA METAL BACK CONTACT

ITO

p-type a-Si:H

n

n--type type aa--Si:HSi:H

c-Si p-type TEXTURED

ITO

Intrinsic a-Si:H FRONT METAL GRID

FULL AREA METAL BACK CONTACT

ITO

p-type a-Si:H

n

n--type type aa--Si:HSi:H

OPV

Dye

CIGS

HIT/TF Si

(18)

Glass requirements for CSP

Mirrors

Anti-soiling and hardness coatings

Will become critical in desert environments

High reliability integrated construction

Heat Collection Elements (HCE’s)

Anti-reflection and low emissivity

coatings

(19)

PV Supply Chain and Cross-Cutting Technologies

Transfer and optimize technologies specifically for the PV industry

Attract new entrants as neutral vendors

Target domestic leadership in value chain segments

Mitigate risk across currently funded technologies

Accelerate new products by developing “enabling” technologies

Module Components

Flexible barrier or protective coatings

Transparent conductors Contacts (high aspect ratio, printed, non-silver)

Manufacturing

CPV alignment

Material flux measurement Fast optical characterization

Non-Module Components

Inverter components Trackers

Streamlined balance of system solutions

TOPIC AREAS

Impact Factor = ($/W savings) X (project future sales volume)

Value = Impact ($) / DOE funding

Uniqueness - containing sufficient risk to necessitate DOE funding

Feasibility – likelihood of success

(20)

Potential Supply Chain Issues for the Glass Industry

Flat glass available capacity

Current projections are for solar to be <5% of total glass capacity

through 2015

Supply chain issues will be determined on “available” capacity

Single float glass plant (850 MTD) could produce >5 GW

equivalent per year at a capital cost of $100M

Potential for bottlenecks

Raw materials

Low Iron Silica Refining

Only two plants in the US produce low iron silica

Limit to potentially 1 GW of capacity

(21)

Agenda

US Solar Program Overview

Solar Glass Requirements

Market Dynamics

(22)

22

Global PV market projections

Global PV Market Projections

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Year

Gl

ob

al

MW

P

V

Photon (2008) Market

Deutsche (2008) Baseline Supply Goldman Sachs (2008) Supply Simmons & Company (2008) Supply Navigant Accelerated (2008) Market Simmons & Company (2008) Demand Goldman Sachs (2008) Demand JP Morgan (2008) Demand/upside JP Morgan (2008) Supply

Navigant Conservative (2008) Market

Source: Company Analyst Reports / FACC

Although there are large differences between industry analysts’ projections for

the global PV market, even the most conservative forecast shows over 25%

compound annual growth from 2008 to 2012

(23)

Polysilicon supply and price projections

In response to rising polysilicon prices

beginning in 2004, substantial investment

was made in expanding polysilicon

production capacity

Increased polysilicon supply in upcoming years will greatly reduce the feedstock costs for c-Si PV

(24)

PV module price projections by technology

c-Si

Lower polysilicon feedstock prices should allow c-Si PV to continue on its

historical path of price reductions

Based on historical learning curves, CdTe, a-Si and c-Si would reach the Solar America

Initiative (SAI) target of $1.25/W with cumulative production of 0.7 GW, 1.8 GW and 100 GW, respectively

(25)

Federal ITC Extension

On October 3, President Bush signed into law an extension of the 30%

solar investment tax credit (ITC)

Key Points

Term - 8 years

Provides critical extension needed for concentrating solar power (CSP) projects

No cap on residential installations

Removes previous $2,000 limit on residential solar projects

No utility exclusion

Expands significant market for PV and CSP

According to Navigant Consulting, passage of the ITC will result in

440,000 new jobs

As much as 5.4 GW of previously announced utility-scale solar power

projects are now expected to move forward

(26)

26 states and D.C. now have mandatory RPS policies,

and 6 states have set non-binding RPS targets

Source: R. Wiser, LBNL (2008), DSIRE

ƒ Florida recently passed legislation requiring RPS targets to be set next year

(27)

27

Current solar/DG set-asides and multipliers

13 states and D.C. now have solar/DG set-asides, with 2 more states

providing multipliers for DG (WA) and all non-wind (TX)

There is momentum for solar/DG set-asides; of the 13 states with such policies, 7 states enacted their policies in 2007-2008 (DE, MA, MD, NH, NM, NC and OH)

(28)

Required solar capacity additions to meet mandated

solar/DG set-asides

Based on the 12 states and D.C. with defined solar/DG set-asides (MA is TBD),

approximately 2,500 MW of cumulative installations is needed by 2015 and

7,500 MW by 2025

If California is included, an extra 3,000 MW of cumulative installations will be added by 2017 based on the goals of the California Solar Initiative

(29)

29

California Solar Initiative (CSI)

Signed into law in August 2006, CSI provides up to $3.35 billion in incentives

through 2016 with the goal of 3 GW installed capacity by 2017

$2.167 billion for all systems except new homes in the IOU territories (Pacific Gas & Electric, Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric)

$400 million for new homes in the IOU territories

$784 million for all systems outside of the IOU territories

Systems over 50kW receive a performance based incentive (PBI), a bonus for each

kWh produced over five years

PBI starts at $0.39/kWh and declines to $0.03/kWh as statewide solar capacity increases; depends on IOU territory and type (residential or non-residential)

Systems under 50kW can receive a PBI or elect to take the expected performance

based buydown (EPBB), a rebate adjusted to the expected system performance

EPBB starts at $2.50/Wac and declines to $0.20/Wac as statewide solar capacity increases; depends on IOU territory and type (residential or non-residential)

Statewide

MW in Step Government/ Government/ Non-Profit Non-Profit 1 50 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

2 70 $2.50 $2.50 $3.25 $0.39 $0.39 $0.50 3 100 $2.20 $2.20 $2.95 $0.34 $0.34 $0.46 4 130 $1.90 $1.90 $2.65 $0.26 $0.26 $0.37 5 160 $1.55 $1.55 $2.30 $0.22 $0.22 $0.32 6 190 $1.10 $1.10 $1.85 $0.15 $0.15 $0.26 7 215 $0.65 $0.65 $1.40 $0.09 $0.09 $0.19 8 250 $0.35 $0.35 $1.10 $0.05 $0.05 $0.15 9 285 $0.25 $0.25 $0.90 $0.03 $0.03 $0.12 10 350 $0.20 $0.20 $0.70 $0.03 $0.03 $0.10

EPBB Payments (per Watt) PBI Payments (per kWh) Step Residential

Non-Residential

Residential

Non-Residential Commercial Commercial

Current PBI and

EPBB offered

(varies by IOU

territory)

(30)

New Jersey - Consumer On-site Renewable Energy

(CORE) and Solar Renewable Energy Credit (SREC)

New Jersey’s CORE program offered rebates for solar systems

Between May 2001 and August 2007, New Jersey paid an average of $4.30/W in rebates for 40MW of installed capacity; a total cost of over $170 million

The state had not anticipated such a high level of interest, and by early 2007, rebate applications exhausted the program’s funding through 2008

In December 2007, the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (BPU) decided to freeze CORE in April 2008

New Jersey is transitioning to the solar renewable energy credit (SREC) program,

began as a pilot program in April 2007

Provides a tariff for solar based on the market value of SRECs, which are used to meet compliance with New Jersey’s solar set-asides

SRECs have been trading at an average value of over $200/MWh during the past year

The SREC program will improve as a solar incentive if the state’s Solar Alternative Compliance Payments (SACPs) are increased from $300/MWh to $700/MWh in 2009, as was proposed by the BPU

(31)

31

Property Tax Exemptions

28 states and Puerto Rico and now provide solar installations with

property tax exemptions or give local authorities the option to do so

11 of these states (marked with a ) have enacted or expanded their property tax exemptions for solar installations since 2003

The DOE funds the DSIRE database to make information on property tax exemptions more transparent to potential users

D.C.

State gives localities the option to offer an exemption State has property tax exemption or special assessment

State has property tax exemption/assessment and local option

Puerto Rico

VT RI CT MD

(32)

32

D.C.

Puerto Rico

State has a Sales Tax Exemption State has Local Option for Sales Tax Exemption

Sales Tax Exemptions

19 states and Puerto Rico and now provide solar energy with sales tax

exemptions or give local authorities the option to do so

12 of these states (marked with a ) have enacted or expanded their sales tax exemptions for solar energy since 2003

The DOE funds the DSIRE database to make information on sales tax exemptions more transparent to potential users

RI CT

(33)

33

Net Metering

44 states and D.C. now allow for net metering, whether state-wide, for

certain types of utilities or offered voluntarily by individual utilities

Other significant differences in net metering policies include caps on total enrollment or system size, valuation of excess generation and whether third-party owners (solar PPA providers) may net meter

The DOE partners with the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) to provide assistance to state policymakers on best practices for net metering and lessons learned from other states

Source: DSIRE

(34)

While short-term over-supply may exist, U.S., demand is highly

elastic and could take up any drop in system prices

40% of U.S. electricity or 1,000 TWh sold for > $0.10/kWh in 2006

Assumptions:

1kw installed produces 1500 kWh/year

Federal incentives (30% ITC & MACRS)

5% interest rate 25 year term 35% tax rate

15.5% capacity factor (US average)

92% AC/DC conversion 80% BOS derate factor

(35)

Agenda

US Solar Program Overview

Solar Glass Requirements

Market Dynamics

(36)

Potential follow-on Federal solar incentives

Investment Tax Credits

Refundable (back and forward)

Transferable

Use on tax-exempt property

Boost for US manufactured equipment

“Green” Revolving Fund/Infrastructure Bank

Expansion of current Loan Guarantee Program

Economic Stimulus (H.R. 7110)

Increased R&D Funding

Green Schools

Grid modernization

Removal of current 10-year limit on Federal PPA’s

National interconnection and net metering standards

National Renewable Portfolio Standard

(37)

The goal of the SAI is to reduce solar electricity to grid

parity by 2015

(38)

For more information

DOE Solar Program:

http://www.eere.energy.gov/solar/solar_america/

PV Value Clearinghouse:

www.nrel.gov/analysis/pvclearinghouse/

SNL PV Systems R&D:

www.sandia.gov/pv

NREL Solar Research:

www.nrel.gov/solar

To sign up for our Newsletter and Market Analysis or for

any questions on this presentation, email

[email protected]

John M. Lushetsky

Program Manager

Solar Energy Technologies Program

[email protected]

(39)

The DOE Loan Guarantee Program can provide critical capital

for scale-up of PV technologies

Loan guarantees for projects that:

Avoid, reduce or sequester anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases or air pollutants Employ new or significantly improved technologies

Can be deployed commercially

Provide a reasonable prospect for repayment

Are sited in the U.S. or its territories, but may have foreign investors or project sponsors

FY2008

Loan Guarantee Authority $38.5 billion (Expires by end of FY2009) Applications due by February 28, 2009

Breakdown

$10.0 billion for energy efficiency, renewable energy and advanced transmission and distribution technologies $18.5 billion for advanced nuclear power facilities

$2.0 billion for “front end” nuclear fuel cycle facilities

$6.0 billion for coal based power generation, industrial gasification and carbon capture and sequestration

(40)

DOE’s FOA terms give participating companies proprietary rights to

practice IP developed under these awards

Patent Rights

Small, domestic businesses and nonprofits take title to subject inventions under

the Bayh-Dole Act, (35 USC 200), subject to Gov't retained rights:

U.S. Manufacturing Preference March-in rights

If recipient is not expected to achieve practical application of the subject invention;

If necessary to alleviate health or safety needs which are not reasonably satisfied by the Recipient, assignee, or their licensees;

If action is necessary to meet requirements for public use;

If recipient is in breach of U.S. manufacturing preference requirements.

Government-Purpose License

Gov't takes title when awardee is a large business or foreign entity under 48 USC

5908

Waivers may be granted under 10 CFR 784

U.S. Manufacturing Preference, March-In Rights and Government-Purpose License same as for small businesses

Data Rights

DOE has statutes requiring wide dissemination of data first produced under

awards

5-year data protection is granted under EPACT, Hydrogen Future Act.

Awardee's proprietary data is protected.

References

Related documents

Our contributions in this paper are: (a) a thorough task characterisa- tion which led to the identification of a common structure for sequences of user tasks in healthcare QI

You can easily make contact with that greater intelligence of yours through the easy Six-Step Process and The One Command ® and engage your theta brain, the very state.. from

methods to improve detection sensitivity of the ISTA-approved detection method (temperature, incubation time, vacuum and centrifugation) and evaluate the modified method on

As the flight deck crew will be occupied dealing with the emergency situation the Purser is responsible for the PA announcement to the passengers detailing the nature of

:خيراتلاو ةيبرتلا لوصأ اماجوأ اينازنت يف ملعتملا ىلع ةزكترملا ةيبرتلاو يموزون ،اتاكاس ىسومو ،شتيكوأ ونامو ادناك دتمت مويلا اهنم يناعن يتلا ةيعامتجلاا

 Year 1 PPA rate with annual escalator  Termination values &amp; buyout provisions..  Drop substantially after the 5 th year due to

Topic: 6.5 Foreign Exchange Rates and Quotations Skill: Recognition.. 3) A common type of swap transaction in the foreign exchange market is the ________ where the dealer

Solar Thermal Concentrating Solar Power Advocates, EI Other Market Advocacy Fund Market.. Advocacy Fund