• No results found

Wednesday, September 20, :30 p.m. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Wednesday, September 20, :30 p.m. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC"

Copied!
42
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Caru Bowns, PhD, AICPEric Fuller, SE Jon Marshack D. Env. (Chair)

Chad Moffett Alice Valania

Jacqueline Whitelam, AIA (Vice Chair)

C

OMMISSION

S

TAFF

Carson Anderson, Preservation Director Bruce Monighan, AIA, Urban Design Manager Kourtney Burdick, Senior Deputy City Attorney

Wednesday, September 20, 2017

5:30 p.m.

NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC

You are welcomed and encouraged to participate in this meeting. Public comment is taken on items listed on the agenda when they are called. Public Comment on items not listed on the agenda will be heard as noted on the agenda.

Comments on controversial items may be limited and large groups are encouraged to select 3-5 speakers to represent the opinion of the group.

Notice to Lobbyists: When addressing the legislative bodies you must identify yourself as a lobbyist and announce the client/business/organization you are representing.

(City Code 2.15.160).

Speaker slips are available on the City’s Website and located in racks inside the chamber and should be completed and submitted to the Commission Clerk.

Government Code 54950 (The Brown Act) requires that a brief description of each item to be transacted or discussed be posted at least 72 hours prior to a regular meeting. The City posts Agendas at City Hall as well as offsite meeting locations.

The order and estimated time for Agenda items are listed for reference and may be taken in any order deemed appropriate by the legislative body.

The Agenda provides a general description and staff Recommendation; however, the legislative bodies may take action other than what is recommended. Full staff reports are available for public review on the City’s website and include all attachments and exhibits. “To Be Delivered” and “Supplemental” reports will be published as they are received. Hard copies are available at the Community Development Department and all written material received is available at the meeting for public review.

Live videostreams and indexed archives of meetings are available via the internet. Visit the City’s official website at

http://sacramento.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=21 .

Meeting facilities are accessible to persons with disabilities. If you require special assistance to participate in the meeting, notify the Community Development Department at (916) 808-8684 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.

Agenda

Preservation Commission

City Hall – Council Chamber

915 I Street, 1

st

Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

Published by the

(2)

General Conduct for the Public Attending Preservation Commission Meetings

• Members of the public attending the Preservation Commission meetings shall observe the same rules and decorum applicable to the Members and staff as noted in the Historic Preservation, Chapter 17.134, Title 17, of the City Code.

• Stamping of feet, whistles, yells or shouting, physically threatening conduct, and/or similar demonstrations are unacceptable public behavior and will be prohibited by the Sergeant-at-Arms.

• Lobbyists must identify themselves and the client(s), business or organization they represent before speaking to the Commission.

Members of the Public Addressing the Preservation Commission

Purpose of Public Comment. The City provides opportunities for the public to address the Commission as a whole in order to listen to the public’s opinions regarding non-agendized matters within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City during Regular meetings and regarding items on the Agenda at all other meetings.

• Public comments should not be addressed to individual Members nor to City officials, but rather to the Preservation Commission as a whole regarding City business.

• While the public may speak their opinions on City business, personal attacks on Members and City officials, use of swear words, and signs or displays of disrespect for individuals are discouraged as they impede good

communication with the Commission.

• Consistent with the Brown Act, the public comment periods on the Agenda are not intended to be “Question and Answer” periods or conversations with the Commission and City officials. The limited circumstances under which Members may respond to public comments are set out in Rule 8 D 2 of the Council Rules of Procedure.

• Members of the public with questions concerning Consent Calendar items may contact the staff person on the report prior to the meeting to reduce the need for discussion of Consent Calendar items and to better respond to the public’s questions.

Speaker Time Limits

In the interest of facilitating the Commission’s conduct of the business of the City, the following time limits apply to members of the public (speakers) who wish to address the Commission during the meeting.

• Matters not on the Agenda. Three (3) minutes per speaker.

• Consent Calendar Items. The Consent Calendar is considered a single item, and speakers are therefore subject to the three (3) minute time limit for the entire Consent Calendar. Consent Calendar items can be pulled at a member’s request. Such pulled Consent Calendar items will be considered individually and up to three (3) minutes of public comment per speaker on those items will be permitted.

• Each speaker shall limit his/her remarks to the specified time allotment.

• In the further interest of time, speakers may be asked to limit their comments to new materials and not repeat what a prior speaker said. Organized groups may choose a single spokesperson who may speak for the group but with no increase in time.

(3)

Wednesday, September 20, 2017

5:30 p.m.

City Hall – Council Chamber, 915 I Street 1

st

Floor, Sacramento, CA

Open Session

Roll Call

Consent Calendar

All items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered and acted upon by one Motion.

Anyone may request an item be removed for separate consideration

1.

Approval of Minutes of the August 16, 2017 Meeting.

Location:

Citywide

Recommendation: Pass a motion to approve the Preservation Commission Minutes

of the August 16, 2017 Meeting.

Contact:

Carson Anderson, Preservation Director, 916-808-8259

[email protected]

Discussion Items

2.

Update: City Cemetery Preservation Efforts (Oral Report)

Location:

City Cemetery

Recommendation: Review and Comment: Update on the City Cemetery Technical

Advisory Committee selection process, schedule, and interim preservation practices.

Contact:

Christopher Conlin, Director, Parks and Recreation Department; Chair;

Carson Anderson, Preservation Director, 916-808-8259

[email protected]

3.

Update: Ad Hoc Committee for Infill Development in Historic Districts

Location:

Citywide

Recommendation: Review, Comment, and Make a Motion Approving the

Proposed Infill Development Principles as Modified

Contact:

Jon Marshack, Chair; Carson Anderson, Preservation Director,

916-808-8259

[email protected]

4.

Sacramento Heritage, Inc. 2017-2020 Strategic Plan, Goals and Objectives

Location:

Citywide

Recommendation: Review and Comment

(4)

5. Preliminary Certified Local Government (CLG) Work Plan for Fiscal year 2017-2018

Location:

Citywide

Recommendation: Review and Comment

Contact:

Carson Anderson, Preservation Director, 916-808-8259

[email protected]

6. Update: Demolition By Neglect Ad Hoc Committee

Location:

Citywide

Recommendation: Review and Comment

Contact:

Carson Anderson, Preservation Director, 916-808-8259

[email protected]

Directors Reports

7. Directors Reports

Location:

Citywide

Recommendation: Receive and File – Status reports on: nominations to National, California

and Sacramento Registers of Historic Resources; development projects; pending development

applications and appeals; proposed General Plan updates; amendments to Planning &

Development Code, design standards, and other development-related regulations; Community

Development Department organizational and operational changes and work program; training

opportunities; and similar matters.

Contact:

Carson Anderson, Preservation Director, 916-808-8259

[email protected]

Public Comments – Matters Not on the Agenda

8. To Be Announced.

Member Comments - Ideas, Questions and Meeting/Conference Reports

9. To Be Announced.

(5)

Mark Abrahams

Caru Bowns, PhD, AICP Eric Fuller, SE

Jon Marshack, D. Env. (Chair) Chad Moffett

Alice Valania, AIA, LEED AP Jacqueline Whitelam (Vice Chair)

C

OMMISSION

S

TAFF

Carson Anderson, Preservation Director Bruce Monighan, AIA, Urban Design Manager Kourtney Burdick, Senior Deputy City Attorney

Wednesday, August 16, 2017

5:30 p.m.

NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC

You are welcomed and encouraged to participate in this meeting. Public comment is taken on items listed on the agenda when they are called. Public Comment on items not listed on the agenda will be heard as noted on the agenda.

Comments on controversial items may be limited and large groups are encouraged to select 3-5 speakers to represent the opinion of the group.

Notice to Lobbyists: When addressing the legislative bodies you must identify yourself as a lobbyist and announce the client/business/organization you are representing.

(City Code 2.15.160).

Speaker slips are available on the City’s Website and located in racks inside the chamber and should be completed and submitted to the Commission Clerk.

Government Code 54950 (The Brown Act) requires that a brief description of each item to be transacted or discussed be posted at least 72 hours prior to a regular meeting. The City posts Agendas at City Hall as well as offsite meeting locations.

The order and estimated time for Agenda items are listed for reference and may be taken in any order deemed appropriate by the legislative body.

The Agenda provides a general description and staff Recommendation; however, the legislative bodies may take action other than what is recommended. Full staff reports are available for public review on the City’s website and include all attachments and exhibits. “To Be Delivered” and “Supplemental” reports will be published as they are received. Hard copies are available at the Community Development Department and all written material received is available at the meeting for public review.

Live videostreams and indexed archives of meetings are available via the internet. Visit the City’s official website at

http://sacramento.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=21 .

Meeting facilities are accessible to persons with disabilities. If you require special assistance to participate in the meeting, notify the Community Development Department at (916) 808-8684 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting.

Minutes

Preservation Commission

City Hall – Council Chamber

915 I Street, 1

st

Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

Published by the

Community Development Department (916) 264-5011

(6)

General Conduct for the Public Attending Preservation Commission Meetings

• Members of the public attending the Preservation Commission meetings shall observe the same rules and decorum applicable to the Members and staff as noted in the Historic Preservation, Chapter 17.134, Title 17, of the City Code.

• Stamping of feet, whistles, yells or shouting, physically threatening conduct, and/or similar demonstrations are unacceptable public behavior and will be prohibited by the Sergeant-at-Arms.

• Lobbyists must identify themselves and the client(s), business or organization they represent before speaking to the Commission.

Members of the Public Addressing the Preservation Commission

Purpose of Public Comment. The City provides opportunities for the public to address the Commission as a whole in order to listen to the public’s opinions regarding non-agendized matters within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City during Regular meetings and regarding items on the Agenda at all other meetings.

• Public comments should not be addressed to individual Members nor to City officials, but rather to the Preservation Commission as a whole regarding City business.

• While the public may speak their opinions on City business, personal attacks on Members and City officials, use of swear words, and signs or displays of disrespect for individuals are discouraged as they impede good

communication with the Commission.

• Consistent with the Brown Act, the public comment periods on the Agenda are not intended to be “Question and Answer” periods or conversations with the Commission and City officials. The limited circumstances under which Members may respond to public comments are set out in Rule 8 D 2 of the Council Rules of Procedure.

• Members of the public with questions concerning Consent Calendar items may contact the staff person on the report prior to the meeting to reduce the need for discussion of Consent Calendar items and to better respond to the public’s questions.

Speaker Time Limits

In the interest of facilitating the Commission’s conduct of the business of the City, the following time limits apply to members of the public (speakers) who wish to address the Commission during the meeting.

• Matters not on the Agenda. Three (3) minutes per speaker.

• Consent Calendar Items. The Consent Calendar is considered a single item, and speakers are therefore subject to the three (3) minute time limit for the entire Consent Calendar. Consent Calendar items can be pulled at a member’s request. Such pulled Consent Calendar items will be considered individually and up to three (3) minutes of public comment per speaker on those items will be permitted.

• Each speaker shall limit his/her remarks to the specified time allotment.

• In the further interest of time, speakers may be asked to limit their comments to new materials and not repeat what a prior speaker said. Organized groups may choose a single spokesperson who may speak for the group but with no increase in time.

(7)

Wednesday, August 16, 2017

5:30 p.m.

City Hall – Council Chamber, 915 I Street 1

st

Floor, Sacramento, CA

Open Session

at 5:30 pm

Roll Call – All Commissioners were present except for Commissioner Marshack and Moffett

Consent Calendar

All items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered and acted upon by one Motion.

Anyone may request an item be removed for separate consideration

1.

Approval of Minutes of the July 19, 2017 Meeting.

Location:

Citywide

Recommendation: Pass a motion to approve the Preservation Commission Minutes

of the July 19, 2017 Meeting.

Contact:

Carson Anderson, Preservation Director, 916-808-8259

[email protected]

Action: Moved, seconded, and carried (Abrahams/ Valania); 5:0:2; Absent:

(Marshack and Moffett) to approve the July 19, 2017 minutes

Public Hearing

2.

Z17-028 Appeal of 2422 U Street Tentative Map (Noticed on 08-04-17)

Location: Council District 4

Recommendation: Pass a motion recommending the Planning and Design

Commission approve the following, thereby denying the appeal: Item A:

Environmental Exemption (Per CEQA Guidelines section 15315-Minor Land Divisions);

Item B: Preservation Site Plan & Design Review for a proposed Tentative Parcel Map to

subdivide one ±0.15-acre lot into two 40 x 80-foot lots in the Single-Unit or Duplex

Dwelling Zone (R-1B) zone in the Newton Booth Historic; Item C: Tentative Parcel Map

to subdivide one ±0.15-acre parcel into two lots in the Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling

Zone (R-1B) zone (No action needed by the Preservation Commission on Item C).

Contact: Robert W. Williams, Associate Planner, 916-808-7686,

[email protected]

Action: Moved, seconded, and carried (Fuller/Valania); 5:0:2; Absent: (Marshack

and Moffett) to Pass a motion recommending the Planning and Design

Commission approve the project subject to an advisory condition to work with

staff to secure the property site, thereby denying the appeal

(8)

Discussion Items

3.

Update on the Mid-Century Modern Historic Resources Survey – Review of

Discussion of Project’s Draft Historic Context Statement

Location: Citywide

Recommendation: Review and Comment

Contact: Carson Anderson, Preservation Director, 916-808-8259

[email protected]; Mark Bowen, GEI Consultants, Inc., Rancho

Cordova.

Reviewed and commented

4.

Sacramento Valley Station Master Plan

Location: 401 I Street

Recommendation: Review and Comment

Contact: Greg Taylor, AIA, Supervising Architect,

[email protected];

Carson Anderson, Preservation Director, 916-808-8259

Public comment by William Burg

Reviewed and commented

5.

Ad Hoc Committee Update on Infill Development Within Historic Districts

Location: Citwide

Recommendation: Review and Comment

Contact: Carson Anderson, Preservation Director, 916-808-8259

[email protected]

Public comment made by William Burg

Reviewed and commented

Directors Reports

6.

Directors Reports

Location: Citywide

Recommendation: Receive and File – Status reports on: nominations to National,

California and Sacramento Registers of Historic Resources; development projects;

pending development applications and appeals; proposed General Plan updates;

amendments to Planning & Development Code, design standards, and other

development-related regulations; Community Development Department organizational

and operational changes and work program; training opportunities; and similar matters.

Contact: Carson Anderson, Preservation Director, 916-808-8259

(9)

Member Comments - Ideas, Questions and Meeting/Conference Reports

8.

To Be Announced.

(10)
(11)
(12)

Infill Development Ad Hoc Committee Report

Policy Considerations: The recommended actions are consistent with the 2035 General Plan,

which recognizes that “cities with distinctly identifiable places and history are more livable for

residents and more attractive to new businesses that sustain the economy.” The 2035 General

Plan sets forth the following policies to protect the City’s historic and cultural resources:

HCR 2.1.3: Consultation. The City shall consult with appropriate organizations and

individuals, and shall establish a public outreach policy to minimize potential impacts to

historic and cultural resources.

HCR 2.1.4: Incentives and Enforcement. The City shall develop and support regulatory

(e.g. appropriate development and zoning standards), technical, and financial incentives

(e.g. City, State, Federal, and private grants, loans, easements, and tax credits) and

enforcement programs to promote the maintenance, rehabilitation, preservation, and

interpretation of the city’s historic and cultural resources.

HCR 2.1.6: Planning. The City shall take historical and cultural resources into

consideration in the development of planning studies and documents.

HCR 2.1.10: Early Project Consultation. The City shall minimize potential impacts to

(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)

Sacr amen to R iver American River 31 32 24 20 8 28 30 13 29 27 12 14 22 25 4 7 3 5 21 11 2 18 1 17 15 23 16 6 19 9 26 10 J ST L ST I ST P ST Q ST X ST E ST W ST BROADWAY N ST 24TH ST 16TH ST 21ST ST 9TH ST 10TH ST T ST 2ND AVE 29TH ST 7TH ST 15TH ST 3RD ST H ST 19TH ST 30TH ST G ST 8TH ST ST OCKT ON BL VD RIVER SIDE BLVD 34TH ST LAN D PAR K DR ALHAM BRA BLVD C ST FREEP ORT BLVD 14TH AVE FR AN KL IN BL VD FRO NT ST K ST FOLSO M BLVD 39TH ST N B ST 5TH ST 6TH ST 12TH AVE MCKINLEY BLVD JI BBO O M S T VALLEJO WAY SUTTERVILL E RD 39TH ST H ST 39TH ST 24TH ST T ST VALLEJO WAY SUTTERVILLE R D

·

|

}

þ

99

)

*

+

,

-

80

!

"

#

$

5

(

/

50

q

0 1,500 3,000 Legend

City of Sacramento Historic Districts

July 29th, 2015

Adopted Historic Districts

ID Name ID Name ID Name

1 1200-1300 "Q" Street 2 12th Street Commercial 3 North 16th Street 4 20th and N Streets 5 Alkali Flat Central 6 Alkali Flat North 7 Alkali Flat South

12 C Street Industrial 13 Capitol Avenue 14 Capitol 15 Capitol Mansions 16 Cathedral Square 17 Central Shops

18 [Cesar Chavez Memorial] Plaza Park

23 Merchant Street 24 Newton Booth 25 Oak Park 26 Poverty Ridge 27 R Street

28 Sacramento City College 29 South Side

(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)

Attachment 3

Proposed Amendments to the Central City Neighborhood Design Guidelines

Amend Section 2. Administration, of the Central City Neighborhood Design Guidelines as follows: A. Areas / Buildings Subject to These Guidelines . . . 3. Historic Structures and Preservation Areas / Projects Subject to These Guidelines

For properties in the City’s Official Sacramento Register of Historic Structures and in Preservation Areasand Cultural Resources, the preservation standards shall govern. Preservation standards adopted by the Design Review and Preservation Board Commission include:

• The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings

• Listed Structures Plans (Residential and Non-Residential) • Preservation Area Plan

For proposed projects or portions or elements of projects where no preservation standards applyare silent, these Central City Neighborhood Design Guidelines shall apply.

The following Preservation Areas Historic Districts are within the boundaries of these neighborhood design guidelines: West Alkali Flat, North Alkali Flat, South Alkali Flat, C Street Commercial, Washington District, Washington School, C Street Industrial, 12th Street Commercial, Boulevard Park, Memorial Auditorium, Marshall Park, Capitol Avenue, 20th and N, M StreetCapitol Mansions, Winn Park, Bungalow Row, Fremont Park, 1200-1300 Q Street, R Street, Southside, Newton Booth, and Poverty Ridge. Figure 2.3 identifies the Central City Preservation Areas Historic Districts subject to these guidelines.

. . .

E. Areas/Buildings Not Subject to These Guidelines

These guidelines are not applicable to the Railyards, Richards and Central Business District Special Planning Districts (see Figure 2.2). Additionally, the following Preservation Areas Historic Districts are not located within the area of jurisdiction of these guidelines: [Cesar Chavez Memorial] Plaza Park, Merchant Street, Cathedral Square, Central Shops, and Capitol (see Figure 2.3). Also, projects on state owned sites within the Capitol Area Plan boundary are not subject to these guidelines. For Projects located within a Special Planning District the following guidelines apply: • Central Business District (applicable guidelines are Sacramento Urban Design Plan, Streetscape and Architectural Guidelines, and Capitol View Protection Ordinance) • Railyards Special Planning District (applicable guidelines included in the Railyards Specific Plan) • Richards Boulevard Special Planning District (applicable guidelines included in the Richards Boulevard Area Plan)

For Properties in Preservation Areas Historic Districts, and individually listed structures on the City’s Official Sacramento Register of Historic Structuresand Cultural Resources, the applicable guidelines preservation standards are:

(25)

• The California Historical Building Code

• The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Structures.

(26)

Attachment 4

Proposed Amendments to Planning and Development Code Section 17.880.180

Title 17 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE Division VIII ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS Chapter 17.808 PERMITS AND LEGISLATIVE CHANGE REQUESTS Article I. Site Plan and Design Review 17.808.180 Site plan and design review—Decision and findings.

A. Development projects located in a historic district or involving a landmark, including relocation. For projects located in a historic district or involving a landmark, including relocation, the decision-maker may approve an application for site plan and design review based on all of the following findings: 1. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development are consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan or transit village plan; and 2. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of proposed development are consistent with all applicable design guidelines and with all applicable development standards or, if deviations from design guidelines or development standards are approved, the proposed development is consistent with the purpose and intent of the applicable design guidelines and development standards; and 3. All streets and other public access ways and facilities, parking facilities, and utility infrastructure are adequate to serve the proposed development and comply with all applicable design guidelines and development standards; and 4. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development are visually and functionally compatible with the surrounding neighborhood; and 5. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development ensure energy consumption is minimized and use of renewable energy sources is encouraged; and 6. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development are not detrimental to the public health, safety, convenience, or welfare of persons residing, working, visiting, or recreating in the surrounding neighborhood and will not result in the creation of a nuisance; and 1.7. Projects not involving the demolition or relocation of a landmark or contributing resource. For projects not involving the demolition or relocation of a landmark or contributing resource, the decision-maker may approve an application for site plan and design review based on the following findingsEither:

a. The project is consistent with the Secretary of Interior standards Standards and the goals and policies of this chapter; or

b. The project is not fully consistent with the Secretary of Interior standardsStandards, due to economic hardship or economic infeasibility, but the project is generally consistent with, and supportive of, the goals and policies of this chapter. The applicant shall have the burden of proving economic hardship or economic infeasibility; or

c. The project is not fully consistent with the Secretary of Interior standardsStandards, but is consistent with and supportive of identified goals and policies of the general plan or

(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)

References

Related documents

The center will focus more time and energy on supporting substance abuse prevention activities in individual congregations and faith- based organizations, and on helping faith-based

• Follow up with your employer each reporting period to ensure your hours are reported on a regular basis?. • Discuss your progress with

Targeting the computation of NNMs for high-dimensional systems such as those encountered in industry, we propose to solve the set of PDEs using the finite

The uniaxial compressive strengths and tensile strengths of individual shale samples after four hours exposure to water, 2.85x10 -3 M cationic surfactant

Despite the fact that the rise in net saving rate, capital stock and total consumption are the same in these two economies, the permanent increase in consumption that an

In this project we were able to use a Software Defined Radio platform in order to achieve reliable communications between Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs).. Our goal was to

In the task, the workers will see a short video snippet of five seconds and are asked to identify semantic events and mark the team, the time, and the position on the field of the

4.1 The Select Committee is asked to consider the proposed development of the Customer Service Function, the recommended service delivery option and the investment required8. It