• No results found

Using Root Cause Analysis to Reduce All-Cause Readmissions. Howard Dubin, MD

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Using Root Cause Analysis to Reduce All-Cause Readmissions. Howard Dubin, MD"

Copied!
25
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Using Root Cause Analysis to

Reduce All-Cause Readmissions

(2)

Test Your Problem Solving Skills

If you had two U.S. coins totaling 55 cents and one of the coins was NOT a nickel, what

are the two coins?

Can a man living in Milwaukee, Wisconsin be buried west of the Mississippi?

(3)

What is Root Cause Analysis (RCA)?

3

© Qualidigm 2012

• The process used to identify the origin of a

problem

• Uses a specific set of tools to determine:

– What happened?

– Why it happened?

(4)

Root Cause Analysis Basics

Symptom of the problem. “The Weed”

Above the surface

The Underlying Causes “The Root”

Below the surface

The word root, in root cause analysis, refers to the underlying causes, not the one cause

(5)

What Root Cause Analysis is NOT

© Qualidigm 2012 5

Used to blame any one person or group

(6)

Pulling the RCA Community Team Together

• The RCA team is;

– Cross-setting

– Multidisciplinary

– Inclusive of staff directly involved if possible

– Includes Physicians

– Has support of leadership

Everyone on the team is EQUAL

(7)

A Readmission happens….

now what?

(8)

Purpose of the Root Cause Analysis

• Identify the “root” cause of readmissions at

your hospital/facility/agency.

• Identify patterns of readmissions specific to

your community and its providers.

• Use RCA results to guide and target criteria

(9)

Variety of Root Cause Analysis Tools

• Patient/family interviews

• Care coordinator interviews

• Medical record reviews

• Process mapping

• Cause-and-effect diagrams

• “5 Whys”

(10)

Patient/Family Interviews

• Semi-structured telephone or face-to-face

interviews with readmitted patients

• Helps identify opportunities for improvement

(11)

Care Coordinator Interviews

• Conduct individual and/or group interviews with

care coordinators.

• Identify patterns, trends, and opportunities for

improvement from the staff perspective.

• Formulate groups across settings or within provider

teams, organizations, or specialties.

(12)

Medical Record Reviews

• Review randomly sampled hospital discharges

and 30-day readmissions.

• Common finding:

– Patient education is completed and documented,

but patients need more in-depth understanding to self-manage their conditions.

(13)

Process Mapping

• Observe discharge and admission

processes directly, interview

process owners, map the processes.

• Elicit staff and community partner perceptions about

where communication issues and gaps may occur.

© Qualidigm 2012 13

• Clarify specific roles and

(14)

Cause-and-Effect Diagram (Fishbone Diagram)

• Visually illustrates potential causes of high

(15)

“5 Whys”

• Start asking why readmissions occur and

record the answer.

• If the answer does not directly identify the

root cause of your readmissions problem, ask why again and record the answer.

• Continue this process until your team agrees

the problem’s root cause has been identified.

(16)

“5 Whys” Example

Why are so many Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure being

readmitted to our hospital?

Why do they not understand the red

flags?

Because they do not

understand or remember the red flags related to their

condition after discharge.

They do not have the correct documentation or reminder systems in place.

(17)

“5 Whys” Example (cont’d)

© Qualidigm 2012 17

Why do they not have the proper documentation or

reminders?

Why did they not receive the PHR or

magnet?

They did not receive a Personal Health Record (PHR) or red flag magnet with documentation of these red flags upon discharge.

Distribution of these materials is not part of the current discharge process.

(18)

Using RCA to Drive Intervention Selection - Example

RCA Technique: Interview for all patients during one month who

are currently in hospital for a 30-day readmission

Key Findings: (1) Patients did not understand/did not correctly take medications (2) Patient condition worsened;

unsure of what to do, called 911 or came to ED

Intervention Selection: Care Transitions Intervention (CTI)

Intervention improves patient activation and engagement— addresses four pillars (personal health record, red flags, medication

management, and follow-up)

Intervention directly addresses root cause

(19)
(20)

Results from Previous Care Transition RCAs

• RCAs revealed remarkably consistent results

• Patients experienced readmissions because of:

– Unmanaged worsening of their conditions

– Inadequate medication reconciliation

– Lack of patient/family education

– Returning to emergency departments instead of

(21)

Three Basic System Gaps

• Lack of engagement or activation of patients

and families

• Lack of standard processes among providers for

transitioning patients

• Ineffective or unreliable sharing of relevant

clinical information

(22)

RCA Conclusion

• Many evidence-based interventions directed at one

or more of these gaps, but require cooperative activity by more than one provider.

• All communities must build cross-setting or

multi-provider relationships to deploy, measure, and revise implementation strategies.

(23)

Community building is the necessary

groundwork to enable improvement.

(24)
(25)

Thank You

© Qualidigm 2012 25

This material was prepared by Qualidigm, the Medicare Quality Improvement Organization for Connecticut, under contract with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents do not necessarily reflect CMS policy.

References

Related documents

Overall, our CoVaR results indicate that: (1) domestic sovereign debt had a systemic impact on domestic financial systems across European countries that was

We find that natural disasters decrease nonofficial household expenditures significantly, however have negligible effect on official household expenditures.. Meanwhile, both

The resulting data allowed us to examine critically three plausible alternative scenarios in terms of energy allocation tactics: (1) female jacky dragons are ‘pure’ capital

This large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of IFNß-1a by the SPECTRIMS Study Group in patients with SPMS did not meet its primary end point of

• Previous knowledge of American legal research, writing, and resources • Perceived library services. Questions Questions

Even if the composition of channels in a bundle does not change across periods, perceived quality of the content of each channel (e.g. pop- ular shows, movies, etc.) may vary

magnitude less storage than previous methods (a schematic outline of these and related methods is shown in Figure 1). This is the first time the archives have been made accessible

extracellular particles) are consistent members of natural mixed biofilm communities; 2) determine whether temperate phage are present and active in multispecies bacterial biofilms