• No results found

TestingTransformerDifferentialRelays

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "TestingTransformerDifferentialRelays"

Copied!
64
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

TESTING TRANSFORMER DIFFERENTIAL

RELAYS

(2)

TESTING TRANSFORMER DIFFERENTIAL

RELAYS

1.

Introduction.

1.

Introduction.

2.

Protection Functions for Power Transformer.

3

Test Plan

3.

Test Plan.

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(3)

TESTING TRANSFORMER DIFFERENTIAL

RELAYS

1

Introduction

1.

Introduction

.

F

l

d

d

th

t

ti

For

several

decades,

the

protection

relays of power system have undergone

many important changes

(4)

TESTING TRANSFORMER DIFFERENTIAL

RELAYS

ELECTRONIC RELAY ELECTROMECHANICAL

RELAY ELECTRONIC RELAY

RELAY

MICROPROCESSOR RELAYS

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(5)

TESTING TRANSFORMER DIFFERENTIAL

RELAYS

1 Introduction

1. Introduction.

A modern transformer protection and control

system has many features that reflect the trends

system has many features that reflect the trends

of integration, such as:

(6)

TESTING TRANSFORMER DIFFERENTIAL

RELAYS

¾

Differential Protection for two or three winding

¾

Differential Protection for two or three winding

transformer.

¾

Second Harmonic Blocking

¾

Second Harmonic Blocking.

¾

Fifth Harmonic Blocking .

¾

Restricted Earth Fault Element.

¾

Phase Overcurrent Protection.

¾

Ground Overcurrent Protection.

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(7)

TESTING TRANSFORMER DIFFERENTIAL

RELAYS

¾

Over/Under voltage Elements.

¾

Over/Under voltage Elements.

¾

Frequency Elements.

¾

Thermal Element

¾

Thermal Element.

¾

Events recorder.

¾

Fault recorder

¾

Fault recorder.

(8)

TESTING TRANSFORMER DIFFERENTIAL

RELAYS

The new protection features must be tested in

The new protection features must be tested in

different system known conditions, which can

influence both its performance and safety.

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(9)

2.

Protection Functions for Power

Transformer.

2.1 Transformer Differential Protection.

2.1 Transformer Differential Protection.

It is the most important transformer protection

function.

(10)

2.1 Transformer Differential Protection

Idiff = I

1

+ I

2

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(11)

2.1 Transformer Differential Protection

The advantage of microprocessor technology is

g

p

gy

that

each

manufacturer

defines

their

own

algorithms, features and parameters to adjust

the differential function.

(12)

2.1 Transformer Differential Protection

Setting:

1. Turn Point 1: Fixed 2 T P i t 2 V i bl

ABB RET543 RELAY

2. Turn Point 2: Variable 3. Slop 1: Variable

4. Slop 2: Fixed

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(13)
(14)

2.1 Transformer Differential Protection

Iop= I1 + I2

Iop= I1 + I2

Irst= (|I1 | + |I2 |)/k

SEL RELAY

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(15)
(16)

2.1 Transformer Differential Protection

Another point to consider is the new option to filter

p

p

the zero sequence component of phase currents.

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(17)

2.

Protection Functions for Power

Transformer.

2.2 Blocking Function

For harmonic blocking, the harmonic content of

the differential current must exceed the individual

threshold values

threshold values

¾ Second Harmonic for inrush conditions

(18)

2.

Protection Functions for Power

Transformer.

2.3 Restricted Earth Fault Element.

This element provides sensitive protection against

ground

faults

in

wye-connected

transformer

winding

winding.

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(19)

2.

Protection Functions for Power

Transformer.

2.4 Phase and Ground Overcurrent Protection.

IED

id

t l

t

IED provides numerous overcurrent elements

per winding.

Ph

d

ti

Phase,

ground

or

negative

sequence

instantaneous/definite

time

elements

are

available

for

single-

or

three-pole

feeder

available

for

single

or

three pole

feeder

protection,

breaker

failure

protection,

transformer backup protection, etc.

(20)

2.

Protection Functions for Power

Transformer.

2.5

Transformer

and

CT

connection

compensation

compensation

Transformer and CT connection compensation

adjusts the sets of three phase currents for the

adjusts the sets of three-phase currents for the

phase

angle

and

phase

interaction

effects

introduced by the winding connection of the

introduced by the winding connection of the

transformer and CTs.

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(21)

2.

Protection Functions for Power

Transformer.

(22)

2.

Protection Functions for Power

Transformer.

2.5 Transformer and CT connection compensation

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(23)

2. Protection Functions for Power

Transformer.

2.5 Transformer and CT connection compensation

(24)

3. Test Plan

3.1 Steady State Test

-

Pickup

of

differential,

overcurrent,

overvoltage or undervoltage functions.

-

Blocking functions

Differential Characteristic

-

Differential Characteristic

-

Overcurrent Characteristic

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(25)

3. Test Plan

Test set connection

CT1 I1 I2 RELÉ CT2 CT3 I2 I3 I4 CT4 CT5 I5 I6

(26)

3. Test Plan

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(27)
(28)

3. Test Plan

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(29)
(30)

3. Test Plan

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(31)
(32)

3. Test Plan

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(33)
(34)

3. Test Plan

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(35)
(36)

3. Test Plan

0.522 * sqrt(3) = 0.904q ( )

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(37)
(38)

3. Test Plan

YY Transformer

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(39)
(40)

3. Test Plan

Iop= I1 + I2

Iop= I1 + I2

Irst= (|I1 | + |I2 |)/k

SEL RELAY

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(41)
(42)

3. Test Plan

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(43)
(44)

3. Test Plan

DABY Transformer

ABC Rotation

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(45)

3. Test Plan

X

X

(46)

3. Test Plan

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(47)
(48)

3. Test Plan

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(49)
(50)

3. Test Plan

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(51)

3. Test Plan

3.2 Dynamic Tests ( SSIMUL )

-

2

nd

and 5

th

Harmonic blocking function

-

Trip with 2

p

nd

and 5

th

Harmonic

-

Trip with 2

nd

Harmonic in one phase

No operation with 5

th

harmonic in one phase

-

No operation with 5

th

harmonic in one phase

-

External fault simulation

(52)

3. Test Plan

3.2 Dynamic Tests ( SSIMUL )

3.2 Dynamic Tests ( SSIMUL )

Trip for 2nd Harmonic 3 Phase Test (PCT2 = 15%)

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(53)

3. Test Plan

3.2 Dynamic Tests ( SSIMUL )

3.2 Dynamic Tests ( SSIMUL )

(54)

3. Test Plan

3.2 Dynamic Tests ( SSIMUL )

3.2 Dynamic Tests ( SSIMUL )

Internal Fault

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(55)

3. Test Plan

3.2 Dynamic Tests ( SSIMUL )

3.2 Dynamic Tests ( SSIMUL )

(56)

3. Test Plan

3.2 Dynamic Tests ( SSIMUL )

3.2 Dynamic Tests ( SSIMUL )

External Fault

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(57)

3. Test Plan

3.2 Dynamic Tests ( SSIMUL )

3.2 Dynamic Tests ( SSIMUL )

(58)

3. Test Plan

3.3 Transient Tests ( TRANS – COMTRADE

Files )

Files )

-

2

nd

and 5

th

Harmonic blocking function

d

h

-

Trip with 2

nd

and 5

th

Harmonic

-

Trip with 2

nd

Harmonic in one phase

-

No operation with 5

th

harmonic in one phase

External fault simulation

-

External fault simulation

-

Internal fault simulation

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(59)

3. Test Plan

3.3 Transient Tests

2nd Harmonic - DATC

3.3 Transient Tests

2nd Harmonic - DATC

(60)

3. Test Plan

3.3 Transient Tests

2nd Harmonic – COMTRADE file

3.3 Transient Tests

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(61)

3. Test Plan

3.3 Transient Tests

Internal Fault – COMTRADE file

3.3 Transient Tests

Differential Sensibilization

(62)

3. Test Plan

3.3 Transient Tests

Overexcitation – COMTRADE file

3.3 Transient Tests

ff Blocking Enable Differential Sensibilization

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

(63)

TESTING TRANSFORMER DIFFERENTIAL

RELAYS

(64)

TESTING TRANSFORMER DIFFERENTIAL

RELAYS

Doble International Protection Testing Users Group Conference Austin TX – Oct 13 – 14 2010

References

Related documents

The most inaccurate video streaming process can affect the user's convenience while watching videos, so the service is transferred across the network by

MAKING THE CASE FOR GREAT HIRING > DEFINING HIRING NEEDS > SOURCING > ASSESSING > MAKING THE HIRING DECISION > ONBOARDING.?. IT’S GETTING HARDER TO MAKE GOOD

b) Model-based RL: The model presented in the current work bears a number of resemblances with model-based approaches to RL. First, variational autoencoders have been used

• Working-age Medicare beneficiaries report higher annual total prescription costs ($3,206 vs. 31), compared to the elderly Medicare population. • Based on the standard

Particular attention is paid to multiplicity fluctuations as a first consequence of temperature fluctuations, to the equivalence of temperature and volume fluctuations, to the

Of the potential ROS sources described to date, xanthine oxidase, NADPH oxidase (Nox), mitochondria, and uncoupled nitric oxide synthase have gained a status as the most

46: Bacteria of the Respiratory Tract Unknown environmental sample / project Continue Ex.. 51: Enterotube  ID unknown environmental sample