• No results found

A Third Order Runge Kutta Method Based on Linear Combination of Arithmetic Mean, Harmonic Mean and Geometric Mean for Hybrid Fuzzy Differential Equation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "A Third Order Runge Kutta Method Based on Linear Combination of Arithmetic Mean, Harmonic Mean and Geometric Mean for Hybrid Fuzzy Differential Equation"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

10th & 11th January 2019

42

A Third Order Runge-Kutta Method Based on Linear

Combination of Arithmetic Mean, Harmonic Mean and

Geometric Mean for Hybrid Fuzzy Differential Equation

GethsiSharmila . R

1

, Evangelin Diana Rajakumari . P

2

,

Assistant Professor1,2, PG and Research Department of Mathematics1,2,

Bishop Heber College, Tiruchirappalli-17.

[email protected] 1,[email protected]

Abstract-In this paper, the numerical solution of hybrid fuzzy differential equation by using the third order Runge-Kutta method based on linear combination of Arithmetic mean, Harmonic mean and Geometric mean is proposed. The exact, approximate and absolute error are calculated for the hybrid fuzzy differential equations and compared with the third order Runge-Kutta method based on Arithmetic mean, Harmonic mean and Geometric mean. A graphical representation of the solution is also given. The proposed method provides an efficient and powerful mathematical tool for solving hybrid fuzzy differential equations.

Index Terms-Hybrid fuzzy differential equations, Runge-Kutta method, Arithmetic mean, Harmonic mean, Geometric mean, Absolute error.

1. INTRODUCTION

Control systems that are capable of controlling complex systems which have discrete time dynamics and continuous time dynamics can be modeled by hybrid systems. The differential systems containing fuzzy valued functions and interaction with a discrete time controller are named as hybrid fuzzy differential systems.

Pederson and Sambandham [10, 11] used the Euler and Runge-Kutta methods for solving hybrid fuzzy differential equations. The stability properties and comparision theorems are studied in [10, 6, 7]. Prakash and Kalaiselvi [12] have studied the numerical solution of hybrid fuzzy differential equations by predictor-corrector three step method. Kanagarajan, Indrakumar and Muthukumar in [5] have studied the numerical solution of hybrid fuzzy differential equations by Runge-Kutta method of order five and the dependency problem in fuzzy

computation. The solution of hybrid fuzzy

differential equations using Adams-Bashforth,

Adams-Moulton and Predictor-Corrector methods are discussed in [3]. Narayanamoorthy et al in [9, 8] used Iterative procedure and Taylors series method to solve hybrid fuzzy differential equations. A numerical solution for hybrid fuzzy differential equations by Adams fifth order predictor-corrector method was studied by Jayakumar and Kanagarajan in [4]. GethsiSharmila have solved fourth order Runge-Kutta method based on geometric mean for hybrid fuzzy initial value problem and centroidal mean for fuzzy and hybrid fuzzy initial value problem in [1, 2].

In this work, a third order Runge-Kutta Method based on linear combination of Arithmetic

Mean, Harmonic Mean and Geometric Mean is proposed to solve Hybrid fuzzy differential equations.

2. PRELIMINARIES

Definition:2.1( Fuzzy Set )

If X is a collection of objects denoted generally by x, then a fuzzy set

A

~

in X is a set of ordered pairs

A

~

(

x

,

A~

(

x

))

/

x

X

, where

)

(

~

x

A

is called the membership function or grade

of membership of x in

A

~

.

Definition: 2.2 ( Membership Function )

The membership function values need not always be described by discrete values. Sometimes, these turn out to be as described by a continuous function.

The notation commonly used to denote the

membership functions are:

(i) The membership function of a fuzzy set

A

~

is

denoted by ~

(

x

)

A

, i.e.,

]

1

,

0

[

:

)

(

~

x

X

A

.

(ii) The membership function of a fuzzy set

A

~

has the following form

]

1

,

0

[

:

~

X

(2)

10th & 11th January 2019

43 Types of Fuzzy Numbers :

The types of fuzzy numbers are based on the shapes of the fuzzy numbers. Commonly we use the

triangular fuzzy number the most. Also we have ordinary fuzzy number (interval), trapezoidal fuzzy number, parallelogram fuzzy number and bell shaped fuzzy number.

Definition: 2.3 ( Triangular fuzzy number )

It is a fuzzy number represented with three points as follows:

A

~

(

a

1

,

a

2

,

a

3

)

, this representation isinterpreted as membership functions and holds the following condition

(i)

a

1 to

a

2 is increasing function (ii)

a

2 to

a

3 is decreasing function (iii)

a

1

a

2

a

3

  

   

 

  

  

3 3 2

2 3

3

2 1

1 2

1

1

~

, 0

, , , 0

) (

a x

a x a a

a x a

a x a a

a a x

a x

x

A

 

Now, if you get crisp interval by

- cut operation, interval

A

~

shall be obtained

as follow

[

0

,

1

]

from

2 3

) ( 3 3

1 2

1 ) ( 1

,

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

The Third order runge-kutta method based on a linear Combination of Arithmetic Mean (AM), Harmonic Mean (HAM) and Geometric Mean (GM) for IVP was introduced by Khattri as follows

45

)

,

(

32

)

,

(

)

,

(

14

)

,

(

1 2

2 1 2

1

2 1

k

k

GM

k

k

HM

k

k

AM

k

k

RM

For the initial value problem of the form

)

,

(

t

y

f

y

, the Third order Runge-Kutta

methods using variety of means can be written in the

form

 

2

1 1

2

i n

n

Means

h

y

y

(2.3)

where,

)

,

)

(

(

)

,

(

)

,

(

2 3 1 2 3

2 3

1 1 1

2 1

hk

a

hk

a

y

h

a

a

t

f

k

hk

a

y

h

a

t

f

k

y

t

f

k

n n

n n

n n

where the parameters for RK3MC:

9

10

,

9

4

,

3

2

3 2

1

a

a

a

3. THE HYBRID FUZZY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

The hybrid fuzzy differential equation

0 0

1

)

(

...

,

2

,

1

,

0

]

,

[

,

)

)

(

),

(

,

(

)

(

y

t

y

k

t

t

t

y

t

y

t

f

t

y

k k k k

(3.1)

Where

t

k

0

is strictly increasing and unbounded,

k

y

denotes

y

(

t

k

)

,

f

:

[

t

0

,

)

R

R

R

is continuous, and each

k

:

R

R

is a

continuous function. A solution to (3.1) will be a function

y

:

[

t

0

,

)

R

satisfying (3.1) . For k = 0, 1, 2, 3, … , let

f

k

:

[

t

k

,

t

k1

)

R

R

where,

)

)

(

,

)

(

,

(

)

)

(

,

(

t

y

k

t

f

t

y

k

t

k

y

k

f

.

The hybrid fuzzy differential equation in (3.1) can be written in expanded form as

   

    

 

   

   

   

. .

.

. .

.

, ) ( , ) ) ( , ( ) ) ( ,) ( , ( ) (

. .

.

. .

.

, ) ( , ) ) ( , ( ) ) ( , ) ( , ( ) (

, ) ( , ) ) ( , ( ) ) ( ,) ( , ( ) (

) (

1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

k k k k k k k k k k

k t f t y t y f t y t y t y t t t

y

t t t y t y t y t f y t y t f t y

t t t y t y t y t f y t y t f t y

t y

  

  

(3.2)

and a solution of (3.1) can be expressed as

   

    

 

  

  

  

. .

. .

, )

(

. .

. .

, )

(

, )

(

) (

1 2 1

1 1

1 0

0 0

k k

k

k t y t t t

y

t t t y

t y

t t t y

t y

t y

(3.3)

(3)

10th & 11th January 2019

44

and piecewise differentiable over

[

t

0

,

)

and

differentiable on each interval

(

t

k

,

t

k1

)

for any

fixed

y

k

R

and k = 0, 1, 2, … .

4. A THIRD ORDER RUNGE-KUTTA METHOD BASED ON LINEAR COMBINATION OF ARITHMETIC MEAN, HARMONIC MEAN AND GEOMETRIC MEAN FOR HYBRID FUZZY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION

Consider the IVP (3.1) with crisp initial condition

y

(

t

0

)

y

0

R

and

t

[

t

0

,

T

]

.

Let the exact solution

Y

(

t

)

r

Y

(

t

;

r

)

,

Y

(

t

;

r

)

is approximated

by some

y

(

t

)

r

y

(

t

;

r

)

,

y

(

t

;

r

)

from the equation (2.3)

We define

   

3 1 , , , 1 , 3 1 , , , 1 ,

)

(

;

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

;

(

)

(

)

(

i n k n k i i n k n k i n k n k i i n k n k

r

y

t

k

w

r

y

r

y

r

y

t

k

w

r

y

r

y

where

w

1

,

w

2

,

w

3 are constants,
(4)

10th & 11th January 2019 45

))

(

,

(

))

(

,

(

))

(

,

(

))

(

,

(

32

))

(

,

(

))

(

,

(

))

(

,

(

))

(

,

(

2

))

(

,

(

))

(

,

(

))

(

,

(

))

(

,

(

2

))

(

,

(

))

(

,

(

2

))

(

,

(

7

)

(

),

(

;

, , 3 , , 2 , , 2 , , 1 , , 3 , , 2 , , 3 , , 2 , , 2 , , 1 , , 2 , , 1 , , 3 , , 2 , , 1 , , ,

r

y

t

k

r

y

t

k

r

y

t

k

r

y

t

k

r

y

t

k

r

y

t

k

r

y

t

k

r

y

t

k

r

y

t

k

r

y

t

k

r

y

t

k

r

y

t

k

r

y

t

k

r

y

t

k

r

y

t

k

r

y

r

y

t

T

n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k n k k

The exact solutions at

t

k,n1 is given by

;

(

)

,

(

)

2

)

(

)

(

)

(

,

)

(

;

2

)

(

)

(

, , , , 1 , , , , , 1 ,

r

Y

r

Y

t

T

h

r

Y

r

Y

r

Y

r

Y

t

S

h

r

Y

r

Y

n k n k n k k k n k n k n k n k n k k k n k n k

 

The approximate solutions at

t

k,n1 is given by

;

(

)

,

(

)

2

)

(

)

(

)

(

,

)

(

;

2

)

(

)

(

, , , , 1 , , , , , 1 ,

r

y

r

y

t

T

h

r

y

r

y

r

y

r

y

t

S

h

r

y

r

y

n k n k n k k k n k n k n k n k n k k k n k n k

 

5. NUMERICAL EXAMPLES

Consider the following HFDEs



1

0

,

]

)

125

.

0

125

.

1

(

,

)

25

.

0

75

.

0

(

[

)

;

(

...

,

2

,

1

,

0

,

]

,

[

,

)

)

(

(

)

(

)

(

)

(

1

r

e

r

e

r

r

t

y

k

k

t

t

t

t

t

y

t

m

t

y

t

y

t t k k k k k

(5.1) where

5

.

0

)

1

mod

(

,

)

)

1

mod

(

1

(

2

,

5

.

0

)

1

mod

(

,

)

)

1

mod

(

(

2

)

(

t

if

t

t

if

t

t

m

}

...

,

2

,

1

{

,

,

0

,

0

)

(

k

if

k

if

k

The exact solution for

t

[

0

,

2

]

is given by

                    . ] 2 , 5 . 1 [ , ] ) 4 3 ( 2 2 [ ) ; 1 ( , ] 5 . 1 , 1 [ , ] 2 3 [ ) ; 1 ( , ] 1 , 0 [ , ] ) 125 . 0 125 . 1 ( , ) 25 . 0 75 . 0 ( [ ) ; ( 5 . 1 1 t e e t r Y t t e r Y t e r e r r t Y t t t t

The approximate solution, exact solution and absolute error using the third order Runge-Kutta method based on a linear combination of Arithmetic Mean, Harmonic Mean and Geometric Mean for the r-level set with h = 0.5 and t = 2 of the example (5.1) is Given below.

r t

Absolute Error RK3 AM Absolute Error RK3 HaM Absolute Error RK3 GM Absolute Error RK3 AM HAM GM

0 2

5.4 0E -02 8.1 0E -02 1.6 4E -01 2.4 6E -01 1.0 5E -01 1.5 8E -01 8.6 8E -02 1.3 0E -01 0 . 1 2 5.5 8E -02 8.0 1E -02 1.7 0E -01 2.4 4E -01 1.0 9E -01 1.5 6E -01 8.9 7E -02 1.2 9E -01 0 . 2 2 5.7 6E -02 7.9 2E -02 1.7 5E -01 2.4 1E -01 1.1 2E -01 1.5 4E -01 9.2 6E -02 1.2 7E -01 0 . 3 2 5.9 4E -02 7.8 3E -02 1.8 1E -01 2.3 8E -01 1.1 6E -01 1.5 2E -01 9.5 5E -02 1.2 6E -01 0 . 4 2 6.1 2E -02 7.7 4E -02 1.8 6E -01 2.3 5E -01 1.1 9E -01 1.5 1E -01 9.8 4E -02 1.2 4E -01 0 . 5 2 6.3 0E -02 7.6 5E -02 1.9 2E -01 2.3 3E -01 1.2 3E -01 1.4 9E -01 1.0 1E -01 1.2 3E -01 0 . 6 2 6.4 8E -02 7.5 6E -02 1.9 7E -01 2.3 0E -01 1.2 6E -01 1.4 7E -01 1.0 4E -01 1.2 2E -01 0 . 7 2 6.6 6E -02 7.4 7E -02 2.0 3E -01 2.2 7E -01 1.3 0E -01 1.4 5E -01 1.0 7E -01 1.2 0E -01 0 . 8 2 6.8 4E -02 7.3 8E -02 2.0 8E -01 2.2 4E -01 1.3 3E -01 1.4 4E -01 1.1 0E -01 1.1 9E -01 0 . 9 2 7.0 2E -02 7.2 9E -02 2.1 3E -01 2.2 2E -01 1.3 7E -01 1.4 2E -01 1.1 3E -01 1.1 7E -01

1 2

(5)

10th & 11th January 2019

46 The Graphical representation of the exact and

approximate solution of the third order Runge-Kutta method based on the linear combination of Arithmetic Mean, Harmonic Mean and Geometric Mean for example 5.1. where t = 2, h = 0.5 is given below

6. CONCLUSION

In this paper, a new numerical method for solving first order hybrid fuzzy differential equation is proposed. Here the first order hybrid fuzzy diffe rential equation is solved using the third order Runge-Kutta method based on the linear combination of Arithmetic Mean, Harmonic Mean and Geometric Mean. The Comparison of the solution

obtained by the proposed method with the existing methods. From the numerical example, we can conclude that the proposed method is suitable for solving hybrid fuzzy initial value problem.

REFERENCES

[1] Henry Amirtharaj E. C., GethsiSharmila R.,

Fourth Order Runge-Kutta Method based on Geometric Mean for Hybrid Fuzzy Initial Value Problems, in IOSR Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 13, (Mar.-Apr. 2017), 43-51.

[2] Henry Amirtharaj E. C. and GethsiSharmila R.,

Fourth Order Runge-Kutta Method based on Centroidal Mean for Fuzzy Initial Value Problems and Hybrid Fuzzy Initial Value Problems,

Emerging Trends in Mathematics and Mathematics Education, (2017), 63-80.

[3] Jayakumar T., Kanagarajan K., Muthukumar T.,

Numerical Solution for Hybrid Fuzzy System by Adams fourth order predictor-corrector method,

International Journal of Mathematical

Engineering and Science, Vol. 3 Issue (Jan 2014), 24-40.

[4] Jayakumar T., Kanagarajan K., Numerical

Solution of Hybrid Fuzzy Differential Equations by Adams Fifth Order Predictor- Corrector Method, International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology Vol. X Issue x-(May 2014), ISSN: 2231-5373.

[5] Kanagarajan K., Indrakumar S., Muthukumar S.,

Numerical Solution of hybrid fuzzy differential equations by runge-kutta method of order five

and the dependency problem, Annals of Fuzzy

Mathematics and Informatics (2015) 1-11.

[6] Lakshmikantham V., Liu X. Z., Impulsive

hybrid systems and stability theory,

International Journal of Nonlinear Differential Equations, 5 (1999), 9-17.

[7] Lakshmikantham V., Mohapatra R. N., Theory

of fuzzy differential equations and inclusions,

Taylor and Francis, United Kingdom, 2003.

[8] Narayanamoorthy S., Mathankumar S., Hybrid

Fuzzy Differential Equations-Picard’s Method,

International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 113, No. 12 (2017), 133-141.

[9] Narayanamoorthy S., Sathiyapriya S. P.,

Santhiya M., Solving Hybrid Fuzzy Differential

Equations Using Taylor Series Method,

International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 106 No.5 (2016), 1-10.

[10]Pederson S., Sambandham M., Numerical

Solution to hybrid fuzzy systems, Mathematical

and Computer Modelling 45 (2007) 1133-1144.

[11]Pederson S., Sambandham M., The Runge-Kutta

for Hybrid Fuzzy Differential Equations,

Nonlinear Analysis Hybrid Systems 2 (2008) 626- 634.

References

Related documents

Loss of Identity, Radicalization, and Terrorism: Case studies in France and Belgium.. A Research Thesis

Nili Ahmadabadi, Effect of modified heat treatments on the microstructure and mechanical properties of a low alloy high strength steel, Materials Science and Technology ,

Araştırmamızda aynı zamanda, e-hizmet kalitesini oluşturan kullanım kolaylığı, güvenlik, müşteri hizmetleri gibi literatürde daha önce test edilen boyutlar

The present paper is an attempt to introduce an innovative technique for a more effective teaching of L2 listening comprehension through a process-oriented approach. Much of what

Xanthan yield from cassava and rice husk flours increased with the quantity of the substrates (Table 3), however, the conversion efficiency from substrate to xanthan

Perfectionistic strivings global scores only differed between veterans and sub‑elite groups (F (2,115)  = 7.08; p = 0.001; η²p = 0.11), specific analyses of the personal

This study analyzed the association between the clinical variables of the patient group (the scores of the Beck Anxiety Inventory, the Panic Disorder Severity Scale, the Panic