• No results found

Module 5

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Module 5"

Copied!
49
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Module 5:

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)

Boundary Layer Equations for

laminar flow over a flat plate

(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)

Blasius Exact Solution

• Blasius performed a transformation technique to change the set of two partial differential equations into a single ordinary differential equation.

• Continuity and Momentum equations

Boundary conditions, y = 0, u = v = 0, y  , u = U.

• The exact solution of boundary layer equations is known as

similarity solution. For the flow over a flat plate, the similarity solution is often referred to as Blasius solution.

(26)
(27)

• Blasius transformed the above partial differential equations into single, higher-order, nonlinear, ordinary differential equation.

• Boundary conditions

• where is Blasius similarity variable

• Blasius solved this third order non-linear differentia equation through analytical techniques.

(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)

Turbulent Boundary Layer Over A Flat Plate

(32)

Turbulent Boundary Layer Over A Flat Plate

Generally, the boundary layer may be divided into an internal

zone covering about 0.2δ from the wall and the external zone

outside it.

In the external zone the inertia forces dominate the flow.

(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)

Boundary Layer Separation

(38)

Boundary layer flow with pressure gradient

• In the case of a flat plate we neglect the pressure variation along the flow in a boundary layer.

• This is not valid for boundary layer over curved surface like airfoil

• Owing to object’s shape the free stream velocity just outside the boundary layer varies along the length of the surface.

• As per Bernoulli's equation, the static pressure on the surface of the object, therefore, varies in x- direction along the surface.

• There is no pressure variation in the y- direction within the boundary layer. Hence pressure in boundary layer is equal to that just outside it.

(39)

Boundary Layer Separation

2 2 1 y u dx dp y u v x u u e          

dx dp y u e y  1 0 2 2          

 Momentum Equations to flat plates:

 Close to the wall (y=0) , u=v=0, therefore

 Outside Boundary layer: 0

2 2    y u

At the body surface, therefore ∂2u/∂y2 must always have the same sign as the pressure gradient dpe/dx.

 The external pressure gradient can be:

o dpe/dx=0 <–> U constant (Paralell outer streamlines):

o dpe/dx>0 <–> Udecreases (Divergent outer streamlines):

(40)

Zero pressure gradient:

dpe/dx=0 <–> U0 constant (Paralell outer streamlines):

y

u

Inflection point at the wall

No separation of boundary layer 0 2 2           y y u 0 0 2 2           y y u

Boundary Layer Separation

(41)

Favourable pressure gradient:

dpe/dx<0 <–> U0 increases (Convergent outer streamlines):

0 2 2           y y u y 0 0 2 2           y y u

Curvature of velocity profile remains constant

No boundary layer separation

(42)

 Adverse pressure gradient:

dpe/dx>0 <–> U0 decreases (Divergent outer streamlines):

Boundary Layer Separation

Curvature of velocity profile can change 0 2 2           y y u 0 0 2 2           y y u Boundary layer

Separation can occur

y

P.I.

Separated Boundary Layer

For adverse pressure gradient ( dP/dx >0) second derivative is positive at wall but must be negative at the top of boundary layer to match with U. Thus it must pass through a point of inflexion.

(43)

Separation

• In a situation where pressure increases down

stream the fluid particles can move up against it

by

virtue

of

its

kinetic

energy.

• Inside the boundary layer the velocity in a layer

could reduce so much that the kinetic energy of

the fluid particles is no longer adequate to move

the particles against the pressure gradient.

• This leads to flow reversal.

(44)
(45)
(46)

Control of Boundary Layer Separation

• The total drag on a body is attributed to form drag and skin friction drag. In some flow configurations, the contribution of form drag becomes significant.

(47)

 There are some popular methods for this purpose which are stated as follows.

By giving the profile of the body a streamlined shape

Streamlining reduces adverse pressure gradient beyond the maximum thickness and delays separation

• This has an elongated shape in the rear part to reduce the magnitude of the pressure gradient.

• The optimum contour for a streamlined body is the one for which the wake zone is very narrow and the form drag is minimum.

(48)

Control of Boundary Layer Separation

The injection of fluid through porous wall can also control the boundary layer separation.

 This is generally accomplished by blowing high energy fluid particles tangentially from the location where separation would have taken place otherwise.

 The injection of fluid promotes turbulence.

 This increases skin friction. But the form drag is reduced considerably due to suppression of flow separation.

(49)

Control of Boundary Layer Separation

Fluid particles lose kinetic energy near separation point. So these are either removed by suction or higher energy.

References

Related documents

We will apply the regularization method to convert this mixed system (ill-posed problem) to system of the second kind Volterra–Fredholm integral equations (well-posed problem)..

The imaginary element of Saudi Arabia is thus part of the global resource utilized by activists in order to frame a contemporary problem and social issues and a ‘perfect’

Foam and De-foam manifolds Hose reel, capacity 1200m2 2” Hose reel, capacity variable 2” Power Packs electro/hydraulic High Pressure hoses 1” / 2” Suction hose 2” / 4” Plug

Complete genome sequence of the rapeseed plant-growth promoting Serratia plymuthica strain AS9.. Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome

М.. імовірно залежність між активністю ензимів та вмістом фізіологічного пріона обумовлена тим, що обидва протеїни виконують подібні функції та мають подібну

Our overarching question in this paper is how we should think of the relationship between the temporal binding that occurs in the context of voluntary action and the tem- poral

It has excellent impact strength, scratch and chemical resistance, stiffness, and minimal moisture absorption.