• No results found

AIMS-pp-07.pdf

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "AIMS-pp-07.pdf"

Copied!
18
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

From Nuclei to Quarks

*

1910: Rutherford discovers nucleus

*

1932: Chadwick discovers neutron

*

1940: Pions discovered

*

1950s: Huge zoo of strongly interacting particles discovered

*

1963: Quarks hypothesized (Gell-Mann/Zweig)

(2)

Isospin

set of unitary 2x2 matrices of determinant 1

•  After the discovery of the neutron, further experiments showed

that neutrons and protons looked pretty much the same except for electric charge (Q=0 for neutron, Q=+1 for proton)

•  Heisenberg proposed that they actually were the same: that they

were 2 different states of one particle: the nucleon!

The new symmetry was called Isospin

Spin-1/2 particle

in ordinary space in Isospin spaceNucleon in

up proton

(3)

isospin up (proton)

isospin down (neutron)

Isospin Invariance: Include

QED:

Charge conservation:

Baryon number conserved

Phenomenological

formula for charge +1 for proton

0 for neutron

•  Isospin symmetry is an

approximate symmetry

•  But it is a good approximation,

since electromagnetism is much weaker than the force holding the nucleus together

p = i = 1

2 ,i3 = + 1 2

n = i = 1

2,i3 = − 1 2

(4)

New isospin states from old:

the deuteron

(like orthopositronium)

i =1,i3 =1 = 1 2, 1 2 1 2 , 1

2 = p p

i =1,i3 = 0 = 1 2 1 2, 1 2 1 2,−

1

2 +

1 2,−

1 2 1 2, 1 2 ⎛ ⎝⎜ ⎞ ⎠⎟ = 1

2

(

p n + n p

)

i =1,i3 = −1 = 1 2,−

1 2

1 2,−

1

2 = n n

⎫ ⎬ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ triplet

i = 0,i3 = 0 = 1 2 1 2, 1 2 1 2,−

1

2 −

1 2,−

1 2 1 2, 1 2 ⎛ ⎝⎜ ⎞ ⎠⎟ = 1

2

(

p nn p

)

(5)

1940s: 3 states of nearly equal mass observed in nuclear scattering expts:

Agrees with observation! the pion!

50% 50%

Isospin conservation

Q = ℑ3 + B

2 =

+1 π+

0 π0

−1 π−

⎧ ⎨ ⎪⎪

⎩ ⎪ ⎪

Set B= 0 for pions ⇒pions are 3 states of an isospin triplet

π+ = i =1,i3 = +1

π0 = i =1,i

3 = 0

π− = i =1,i3 = −1

Recall that p = i = 1

2,i3 = + 1

2 n = i = 1

2,i3 = − 1 2

(6)

Pion-Nucleon Scattering π+ = i =1,i3 = +1

π0 = i =1,i

3 = 0 π− = i =1,i3 = −1

p = i = 1

2,i3= + 1 2

n = i = 1

2,i3 = − 1 2

π

×

N

Six Possible Elastic Scattering Channels

π+ + p → π+ + p π− + n → π− + n

⎫ ⎬ ⎪ ⎭⎪

π− + p →π− + p

π− + p → π0 + n

π+ + n →π+ + n

π+ + n →π0 + p

⎬ ⎪ ⎪⎪

⎭ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪

final state must

have i= 3

2

final state will have both i = 3

(7)

Clebsch-Gordon Table:

π

×

N

π + + p →π+ + p = π+ p = 3

2, 3 2

π− + n →π− + n = π− n = 3

2,− 3 2

π− + p →π− + p = π− p = 1

3 3 2,−

1

2 −

2 3

1 2,−

1 2

π− + p→π0 + n = π0 n = 2

3 3 2,−

1

2 +

1 3

1 2,−

1 2

π+ + n→π+ +n = π+ n = 1

3 3 2,

1

2 +

2 3

1 2,

1 2

π+ +n→ π0 + p = π0 p = 2

3 3 2,

1

2 −

1 3

1 2,

(8)

Isospin Conservation

〈π+ p HπN π+p = 〈π−n HπN π−n = 〈3

2 HπN 3

2 = M3

〈π−p| HπN π−p = 1

3 3 2,−

1 2 −

2 3

1 2,−

1 2

⎛ ⎝⎜

⎠⎟

|

HπN

|

1 3

3 2,−

1 2 −

2 3

1 2,−

1 2 ⎛ ⎝⎜ ⎞ ⎠⎟ = 1 3 3

2 HπN 3 2 +

2 3

1

2 HπN 1 2 =

1

3M3 + 2

3M1

〈π−p| HπN π0n = 1

3 3 2,−

1 2 −

2 3

1 2,−

1 2

⎛ ⎝⎜

⎠⎟ |HπN |

2 3

3 2,−

1

2 +

1 3

1 2,−

1 2 ⎛ ⎝⎜ ⎞ ⎠⎟ = 2 3 3

2 HπN 3

2 −

2 3

3

2 HπN 1

2 =

2

3 M3− 2

3 M1 〈π+p|HπN π+p = 〈π−n|HπN π−n =M3

〈π−p|HπN π−p = 1

3M3+ 2 3M1

〈π−p|HπN π0n = 2

(9)

phase-space factor

Agrees with observation! 〈π+p|HπN π+p = 〈π−n|HπN π−n = M3

〈π−p|HπN π−p = 1

3M3+ 2 3M1

〈π−p|HπN π0n = 2

(10)
(11)

Strangeness

1950s: Not all

nuclear interactions conserve isospin!

Strong Nuclear Force Weak Nuclear Force

Isospin conserved Isospin not conserved

Short lifetimes Long lifetimes

Strange particles produced in pairs

Strange particles decay as singletons

Λ

has no charged counterpart

Proposal: Two kinds of nuclear force!

(12)

Gell-Mann/Nishijima

(modify Heisenberg’s formula so that it still works)

1960s: Many new particles and interactions observed –

haphazard assignments of isospin and strangeness

Two interesting features of the states of angular momentum 3/2 :

1) All states that had the same total isospin with J=3 / 2 had the same mass

eg. Δ++, Δ+, Δ0, Δ− all had mass 1232 MeV and all have i = 3 2

eg. Ξ*, Ξ*0 both had mass 1533 MeV and both have i = 12

2) States of different strangeness differed by the same amount of mass

Δ++ = i = 3

2,i3= + 3 2

Δ+ = i = 3

2,i3= + 1 2

Δ0 = i = 3

2,i3=− 1 2

Δ− = i = 3

2,i3=− 3 2

(13)

strangeness

0

-2

-3 i=3/2

i=1

i=1/2

i=0

-1232 MeV

1384 MeV

1533 MeV

1672 MeV?

strangeness

0

-2

939 MeV

1193 MeV

1318 MeV 1116 MeV

1964! in

detected

1961 in

predicted

:

Ω

Gell-Mann / Zweig quarks / aces

J = 3 2

J = 1 2

i3

i3 Δ++

Δ+

Δ0

Δ−

Σ+

Σ0

Σ−

Ξ* Ξ*0

Ω−

p n

Σ+

Σ0

Σ−

Ξ Ξ0

Λ

(14)

Aces or Quarks

•  Perhaps there is a symmetry between isospin and strangeness

•  Isospin & Strangeness  Flavour

•  SU(2) isospin symmetry  SU(3) flavour symmetry

•  SU(3)-flavour is not an exact symmetry due to greater mass

of the strange quark

•  Proposal: all baryons are bound states of 3 quarks in some

combination

•  SU(3) symmetry implies that a baryon is unchanged if we

interchange any two quark flavours

Ground state

0

=

2 1 2

1 2

3

2 1 2

1 2

1

⊗ ⊕

=

(15)

The irreps of SU(3)

Decuplet

10

χ

Singlet

χ

A

Octet-12

Antisymmetric on the first pair

8 12

χ

χ

138

χ

12

8

+

χ

23 8

uuu

ddd

sss

uss+sus+ssu

3

dss+sds+ssd

3

dds+dsd+sdd 3

uus+usu+suu

3

uud+udu+duu

3

udd+dud+ddu

3

uds+usd+dsu+dus+sdu+sud

6

udsusd+dsudus+sudsdu 6

(2(uddu)s+(ussu)d−(dssd)u) / 12

((ussu)d+(dssd)u) / 2

(ud−du)d 2

(uddu)u

2

(dssd)d

2

(us−su)d 2

(dssd)s

2

(ussu)s

2

χ

238 (2s(uddu)+d(ussu)−u(dssd)) / 12

(d(ussu)+u(dssd)) / 2

d(uddu) 2

u(uddu) 2

d(dssd) 2

u(ussu) 2

s(dssd) 2

s(ussu) 2

Octet-23

Antisymmetric on the last pair

There is also an Octet-13

(antisymmetric on the first-last)

(16)

uuu

ddd

sss

uss+sus+ssu

3

dss+sds+ssd

3

dds+dsd+sdd 3

uus+usu+suu

3

uud+udu+duu

3

udd+dud+ddu

3

uds+usd+dsu+dus+sdu+sud

6 strangeness 0 -2 -3 i=3/2 i=1 i=1/2 i=0 -1232 MeV 1384 MeV 1533 MeV 1672 MeV

J = 3 2 i3 Δ++ Δ+ Δ0 Δ− Σ+ Σ0 Σ−

Ξ* Ξ*0

Ω−

(2(uddu)s+(ussu)d−(dssd)u) / 12

((ussu)d+(dssd)u) / 2

(ud−du)d 2

(uddu)u

2

(dssd)d

2

(us−su)d 2

(dssd)s

2

(ussu)s

2

(2s(uddu)+d(ussu)−u(dssd)) / 12

(d(ussu)+u(dssd)) / 2

d(uddu) 2

u(uddu) 2

d(dssd) 2

u(ussu) 2

s(dssd) 2

s(ussu) 2

strangeness 0 -2 939 MeV 1193 MeV 1318 MeV 1116 MeV

J = 1 2 i3 p n Σ+ Σ0 Σ−

Ξ Ξ0

(17)

The Spin part

Use this for the decuplet

Use this for the octet Each bound state has three spin- 1

(18)

C

ol

o

u

r

•  Solution? Add in a new

quantum number – colour!

•  Need 3 different colours

•  Postulate: Every naturally

occurring bound state of quarks is a colour singlet!

Ground state

symmetric

0

=

2 1 2

1 2

3

2 1 2

1 2

1

⊗ ⊕

=

SU(3)

flavour

irreps

symmetric

SU(3)colour irreps! antisymmetric!

violates Pauli principle?!?!?

strangeness

0

-2

-3 i=3/2

i=1

i=1/2

i=0

-1232 MeV

1384 MeV

1533 MeV

1672 MeV

J = 3 2

i3 Δ++

Δ+

Δ0

Δ−

Σ+

Σ0

Σ−

Ξ* Ξ*0

Ω−

ϕA = 1

References

Related documents

Armand Duval’s solution with his conflicts with Marguerite about his doubt of Marguerite’s feeling is talking with Prudence and Prudence said that Armand is charming for her

Implementation of the findings of the survey are largely a matter for the ANI, however the Australian Government Department of Agriculture will maintain an interest in the report

The purpose of this project is to evaluate the feasibility of using distance technology to attract and address the mentor- ing needs of students interested in the

Wilson and coworkers (2000) showed a diet containing conjugated linoleic acid fed to hypercholesterolemic hamsters over 12 weeks significantly reduced the development of early

The Committee’s primary duties and responsibilities include: engaging auditors to perform an annual audit of the Credit Union; providing an annual report on the audit to the Board

b) Anticipate the following arrangement of target has. We built up the assault spread charts that catch the over three kinds of data and tackled the source disconnection

Jerusalem was the center of a culture marked by political oppression, military occupation, social domination, economic exploitation, and religious accommodation.. As Jesus entered

Have a quick look at your home insurance policy – if it includes personal belongings cover you may not need personal baggage cover on your travel insurance.. Get a