Carolina
!
vol.2no.2,summer1976
«v
l
ft*V
r4&
...
m
Carolina
planning
needs
your
support
Carolina
Planning
is:•apolicy-oriented
magazine
focusing onplanningproblemsandissuesastheyrelatetoNorth Carolina• of nationwide importance as the issues discussed are often those confronting states and
localities throughout the country
•published semi-annually bytheDepartmentofCityandRegional Planning,UniversityofNorth
Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Previous
Publications
Grantsusedfortheinitial publicationsofCarolina Planning
were
designedto helpthemagazine
become
self-sufficient. Inordertoachievethisgoal,we
aredependingupon
reader subscriptionstofinance continued publication.
Subscriptions
to Carolina
Planning are
being
offered
at$5.00 a
year.
Thisentitiesthe subscribertotwoissuesofthe magazine.
You
willfindencloseda pre-paid maileraddressedtotheCarolina Planningoffices.Please
make
certainyouincludeyourmailingaddresswithyourcheckor
money
order.introduction
In the StateofNorth Carolina
and
in the nation as awhole, the legitimacyand
desireability ofcityand
regional planning has yet to be fully established. Fortunately, there isa
growing
recognitioninmany
circlesthatplanningisanecessary
element
ofallour attemptstomaintainand
enhance
the qualityoflife.Yet there are
many who
stilloppose
the idea ofplanning,
who
cannot acceptordo
notunderstandthat "planning" implies
no
more
than decidingwhat
we
as acommunity,
state,or nationwant
outof lifeand
working toward those goals in a conscientiousmanner.
Through
the publication of CarolinaPlan-ning,
we
hope
topresent North Carolinians with an in-depth look atsome
of themany
areaswhere
planning is or should be involved.
These
are notlimited, as
many
think, to the much-advertisedproblems
of our central cities, but includesuch
diverseactivities as health care, rural development, natural resource
management,
airport expansion,and
new
town
location toname
several. Few,ifany,residentsofNorth Carolina are unaffected by these issues - all of us should be deeply
concerned
with them.We
atCarolinaPlanninghope you
willtake the timeto readthese articlesand
giveusyourfeelingson
them, or write to usabout
other issues thatconcern
you.Any
suggestions as tohow
we
might improve our publicationwould
also bewelcome.
John
manuel,
editor
staff
editor
managing
editor
John
manuel
craig
richardson
editorial
board
faculty
members
student
members
gorman
gilbert
david
godschalk
george
hemmens
steve
ademeluyi
daniel
fleishman
Carolina Planning is published semi-annually by the students of the
Department
of Cityand
Regional Planning, University ofNorth Carolina,Chapel
Hill,under
grants fromthe Z. SmithReynolds
Foundation ofWinston-Salem, North Carolina,
and
theJohn
ParkerTrustFund,Department
ofCityand
Regional Planning. Carolina Planningwelcomes
comments
and
suggestionson
articlespublishedand
will behappy
to acceptnew
material forfuture editions from interested persons.Such
material should be submitted to the Editor,Department
ofCityand
Regional Planning, UniversityofNorthCarolina,Chapel
Hill, North Carolina 27514.Itshould betyped,
double
spaced, at amaximum
of 20 pages.Additionalcopiesofthe journal are available
on
request fromtheDepartment
ofCityand
Regional Planning, University of North Carolina,Chapel
Hill, North Carolina27514
fora prepaid handling charge of $2.50.Copyright©
bytheDepartment
of Cityand
Regional Planning, Universityof North Carolina, Chapel Hill.table
of
contents
benefits
and
drawbacks
of
the
national
flood
insurance
program
merryl
edelstein
1
The
National Flood InsuranceProgram
offerscom-munities
much-needed
insurance protection against flooddamages
in returnfortheinstitutionofland-use controls in flood hazard areas.
As
the author reveals, however, incentives created by the insuranceend
of theprogram do
not always coin-cide with the program's intended goals.Her
in-vestigation of this
and
otherproblems
pose
questions ofimportancetojurisdictionsenrolled or considering enrollment in NFIP.
a
new
hurricane
protection
plan
for
north
Carolina's barrier islands
craig
richardson
7
Over
thepast 80years, 33 hurricaneshave
affected the North Carolina coast.What
arethepossibilities forsuch
an event reoccuring? And,what
actions havebeen
taken to protect life, property,and
the coastalenvironment
itself? Within, the author attempts toanswer
these questionsforthestring of barrier islands stretching the distance ofthe North Carolina coast.The
examinationexposes
the one-dimensional,and
occasionally impractical,existing public policies.Recommendations
aremade
for amore
comprehensive
policywhich
notonly includes warning, evacuation,and
relief activities, but also preventativemeasures
such
as building designcriteria
and
land use controls.flying
into
turbulence:
the
raleigh-durham
airport
expansion
controversy
Charles
pattison
17
For nearly a decade, the
Raleigh-Durham
Airport Authority hasdocumented
theneed
forexpanded
facilities to
accommodate
increasing levels of air traffic.The
Authority presently stands behindone
particular plan
which
is stronglyopposed
bymany
area residents
and
businesses. Within, the authorexamines
the history of this fightand
revealswhy
alternativeplans otherthan that
chosen
byRDUAA
areworthy
offurther consideration.planning
at
the
grass
roots
level:
the
guilford
county
citizen
participation
program
Charles
f.price
Several yearsago, Guilford
County
setouttoinvolveits rural
and suburban
citizenry in aprogram
todefine
and
addresscommunity
needs
and
desires.The
authortracesthe historyof this effortand
lauds theformation ofwhat
he feels to bea truly effectiveand
broad-based citizen participation program.27
superfarms
and
the coastal
environ-ment:
an
in-depth
look
at
a
large-scale
problem
mary
joan
manley pugh
The
arrival of "superfarms" in the coastal area ofNorth Carolina portends major
changes
forboththeeconomy
and
ecology of this sparsely-inhabitedregion.
The
articleassessesthemajoreffects super-farms are likely to haveon
the area's sensitiveecosystem
and
compares
these with the likelyimpacts ofother available alternative uses.
34
the
site-value
tax:
itspotential
effect
on
urban
and county
land
uses
innorth Carolina
edwin
Chester
43
Over
the years,economists
haveoftenproposed
thesite value tax as the
most
reasonablealternative tothe
much
criticized propertytax.Within, the authorbriefly reviews the theoretical
arguments
favoringsite-value taxation,
and
empirically investigatestheeffecta
change
fromthecurrentpropertytaxsystemtoa site-value tax
would
haveon
various landusesintwo
North Carolina urban centersand
theircoun-ties.