• No results found

Some Results for the Jacobi-Dunkl Transform in the Space $L^{p}(\mathbb{R},A_{\alpha,\beta}(x)dx)$

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Some Results for the Jacobi-Dunkl Transform in the Space $L^{p}(\mathbb{R},A_{\alpha,\beta}(x)dx)$"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Caspian Journal of Mathematical Sciences (CJMS) University of Mazandaran, Iran http://cjms.journals.umz.ac.ir ISSN: 1735-0611 CJMS

.

5(2)(2016), 98-105

Some Results for the Jacobi-Dunkl Transform in the

Space

L

p

(

R

, A

α,β

(

x

)

dx

)

S. EL OUADIH

1

and R. DAHER

2

1

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences A¨ın Chock,

University Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco

2

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences A¨ın Chock,

University Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco

Abstract. In this paper, using a generalized Jacobi-Dunkl trans-lation operator, we obtain a generalization of Titchmarsh’s theorem for the Dunkl transform for functions satisfying the (ϕ, p)-Lipschitz Jacobi-Dunkl condition in the spaceLp(R, Aα,β(x)dx), α≥β≥−21,

α̸= 1 2 .

Keywords: Jacobi-Dunkl operator, Jacobi-Dunkl transform, gen-eralized Jacobi-Dunkl translation.

2000 Mathematics subject classification: 42B37.

1.

Introduction and Preliminaries

Titchmarsh’s ([8], Theorem 85) characterized the set of functions in

L

2

(

R

) satisfying the Cauchy-Lipschitz Condition by means of an

asymp-totic estimate growth of the norm of their Fourier transform, namely we

have:

Theorem 1.1.

[8]

Let

α

(0

,

1)

and assume that

f

L

2

(

R

)

. Then the

following are equivalents:

(a)

f

(

x

+

h

)

f

(

x

)

=

O

(

h

α

)

,

as

h

0

,

1Corresponding author: [email protected] Received: 1 July 2015

Revised: 24 July 2016 Accepted: 6 August 2016

(2)

(b)

|λ|≥r

|

f

b

(

λ

)

|

2

=

O

(

r

)

,

as

r

→ ∞

,

where

f

b

stands for the Fourier transform of

f

.

A similar result of Theorem 1.1 has been established for the Jacobi

transform in the space

L

2

(

R

, A

α,β

(

x

)

dx

) (see [11]). In this paper, we

prove a generalization of Theorem 1.1 for the Jacobi-Dunkl transform

for functions satisfying the (

ϕ, p

)-Lipschitz Jacobi-Dunkl condition in

the space

L

p

(

R

, A

α,β

(

x

)

dx

)

,

1

< p

2. For this purpose, we use the

generalized Jacobi-Dunkl translation operator.

In this section, we recapitulate from ([1]-[6]) some results related to

the harmonic analysis associated with Jacobi-Dunkl operator Λ

α,β

.

The Jacobi-Dunkl function with parameters (

α, β

)

, α

β

21

, α

̸

=

21

,

is defined by the formula:

x

R

, ψ

λα,β

(

x

) =

φ

α,βµ

(

x

)

λidxd

φ

α,βµ

(

x

)

,

if

λ

C\{

0

}

,

1

,

if

λ

= 0,

with

λ

2

=

µ

2

+

ρ

2

,

ρ

=

α

+

β

+ 1 and

φ

α,β

µ

is the Jacobi function given

by:

φ

α,βµ

(

x

) =

F

(

ρ

+

2

,

ρ

2

, α

+ 1

,

(sinh(

x

))

2

)

,

F is the Gauss hypergeometric function (see [1],[7]).

ψ

λα,β

is the unique

C

-solution on

R

of the differential-difference

equa-tion

Λ

α,β

U

=

U

,

λ

C

,

U

(0) = 1

,

(see [5]), where Λ

α,β

is the Jacobi-Dunkl operator given by:

Λ

α,β

U

(

x

) =

d

U

(

x

)

dx

+

A

α,β

(

x

)

A

α,β

(

x

)

×

(

U

(

x

)

− U

(

x

)

2

)

,

with

A

α,β

(

x

) = 2

ρ

(sinh

|

x

|

)

2α+1

(cosh

|

x

|

)

2β+1

,

i.e.,

Λ

α,β

U

(

x

) =

d

U

(

x

)

dx

+ [(2

α

+ 1) coth

x

+ (2

β

+ 1) tanh

x

]

×

U

(

x

)

− U

(

x

)

2

.

Using the relation

d

dx

φ

α,β

µ

(

x

) =

µ

2

+

ρ

2

4(

α

+ 1)

sinh(2

x

)

φ

(3)

the function

ψ

α,βλ

can be written in the form above (see [2])

ψ

λα,β

(

x

) =

φ

α,βµ

(

x

) +

i

λ

4(

α

+ 1)

sinh

(2

x

)

φ

α+1,β+1

µ

(

x

)

,

x

R

,

where

λ

2

=

µ

2

+

ρ

2

,

ρ

=

α

+

β

+ 1.

Denote

L

pα,β

(

R

) =

L

pα,β

(

R

, A

α,β

(

x

)

dx

)

,

1

< p

2 the space of

measur-able functions

f

on

R

such that

f

p,α,β

=

(∫

R

|

f

(

x

)

|

p

A

α,β

(

x

)

dx

)

1/p

<

+

.

Using the eigenfunctions

ψ

α,βλ

of the operator Λ

α,β

called the

Jacobi-Dunkl kernels, we define the Jacobi-Jacobi-Dunkl transform by

F

α,β

f

(

λ

) =

R

f

(

x

)

ψ

α,β

λ

(

x

)

A

α,β

(

x

)

dx,

λ

R

,

and the inversion formula by

f

(

t

) =

R

F

α,β

f

(

λ

)

ψ

α,β

−λ

(

t

)

(

λ

)

,

where

(

λ

) =

|

λ

|

8

π

λ

2

ρ

2

|

C

α,β

(

λ

2

ρ

2

)

|

I

R\]−ρ,ρ[

(

λ

)

dλ.

Here,

C

α,β

(

µ

) =

2

ρ−iµ

Γ(

α

+ 1)Γ(

)

Γ(

12

(

ρ

+

))Γ(

12

(

α

β

+ 1 +

))

,

µ

C\

(

i

N

)

,

and

I

R\]−ρ,ρ[

is the characteristic function of

R\

]

ρ, ρ

[.

The Jacobi-Dunkl transform is a unitary isomorphism from

L

2α,β

(

R

) onto

L

2

(

R

, dσ

(

λ

)), i.e.,

f

2,α,β

=

∥F

α,β

(

f

)

L2(R,dσ(λ))

.

(1.1)

Plancherel’s theorem (1.1) and the Marcinkiewics interpolation theorem

(see [8]) we get for

f

L

pα,β

(

R

) with 1

< p

2 and

q

such that

1p

+

1q

= 1,

∥F

α,β

(

f

)

Lq(R,dσ(λ))

K

f

p,α,β

,

(1.2)

where

K

is a positive constant (see [6]).

The operator of Jacobi-Dunkl translation is defined by :

T

x

f

(

y

) =

R

f

(

z

)

α,β

(4)

where

ν

x,yα,β

(

z

)

,

x, y

R

are the signed measures given by

x,yα,β

(

z

) =

K

α,β

(

x, y, z

)

A

α,β

(

z

)

dz,

if

x, y

R

,

δ

x

,

if

y

= 0

,

δ

y

,

if

x

= 0.

Here,

δ

x

is the Dirac measure at

x

. And,

K

α,β

(

x, y, z

)

=

M

α,β

(sinh(

|

x

|

) sinh(

|

y

|

) sinh(

|

z

|

))

I

Ix,y

×

π

0

ρ

θ

(

x, y, z

)

×

(

g

θ

(

x, y, z

))

α+−β−1

sin

θdθ,

where

I

x,y

=

[

−|

x

| − |

y

|

,

−||

x

| − |

y

||

]

[

||

x

| − |

y

||

,

|

x

|

+

|

y

|

]

ρ

θ

(

x, y, z

)

=

1

σ

x,y,zθ

+

σ

z,x,yθ

+

σ

θz,y,x

,

z

R

, θ

[0

, π

]

, σ

x,y,zθ

=

cosh(x)+cosh(y)cosh(z) cos(θ)

sinh(x) sinh(y)

,

if

xy

̸

= 0

,

0

,

if

xy

= 0

,

g

θ

(

x, y, z

) = 1

cosh

2

(

x

)

cosh

2

(

y

)

cosh

2

(

z

)+2 cosh(

x

) cosh(

y

) cosh(

z

) cos

θ,

t

+

=

t,

if

t >

0,

0

,

if

t

0,

and,

M

α,β

=

2Γ(α+1)

πΓ(α−β)Γ(β+12)

,

if

α > β

,

0

,

if

α

=

β

.

In [2], we have

F

α,β

(

T

h

f

)(

λ

)

=

ψ

λα,β

(

h

)

F

α,β

(

f

)(

λ

)

,

(1.3)

F

α,β

α,β

f

)(

λ

)

=

F

α,β

(

f

)(

λ

)

.

(1.4)

For

α

21

, we introduce the normalized Bessel function of first kind

and order

α

[10] defined by:

j

α

(

x

) = Γ(

α

+ 1)

n=0

(

1)

n

(

x/

2)

2n

n

!Γ(

n

+

α

+ 1)

,

x

R

.

Moreover, we see that

lim

x→0

j

α

(

x

)

1

x

2

̸

= 0

,

by consequence, there exists

C

1

>

0 and

η >

0 satisfying

(5)

Lemma 1.2.

Let

α

β

21

, α

̸

=

21

. Then for

|

ν

| ≤

ρ

, there exists a

positive constant

C

2

such that

|

1

φ

α,βµ+iν

(

x

)

| ≥

C

2

|

1

j

α

(

µx

)

|

.

Proof.

(See [4], Lemma 9).

Denote by

L

mp

α,β

)

,

1

< p

2

, m

= 0

,

1

,

2

...

, the class of functions

f

L

pα,β

(

R

) that have on

R

generalized derivatives

f

(

x

)

, f

′′

(

x

)

, ...., f

(2m)

(

x

)

in the sense of Levi (see [9]) and belong to

L

pα,β

(

R

) with Λ

α,βm

f

L

pα,β

(

R

).

i.e.,

L

mp

α,β

) =

{

f

L

pα,β

(

R

)

/

Λ

mα,β

f

L

pα,β

(

R

)

}

,

where Λ

α,β0

f

=

f

, Λ

mα,β

f

= Λ

α,β

α,βm−1

f

)

, m

= 0

,

1

,

2

...

.

2.

Main result

In this section we give the main result of this paper. We need first to

define (

ϕ, p

)-Lipschitz Jacobi-Dunkl class.

Denote

N

h

by

N

h

=

T

h

+

T

−h

2

I,

where

I

is the unit operator in the space

L

pα,β

(

R

).

Definition 2.1.

A function

f

L

mp

α,β

) is said to be in (

ϕ, p

)-Lipschitz

Jacobi-Dunkl class, denoted by

Lip

(

ϕ, p, α, β

), if

N

h

Λ

mα,β

f

p,α,β

=

O

(

ϕ

(

h

))

,

as

h

0

,

where

m

= 0

,

1

,

2

, ...

and

ϕ

is a continuous increasing function on [0

,

),

satisfying

ϕ

(0) = 0 and

ϕ

(

ts

) =

ϕ

(

t

)

ϕ

(

s

) for all

t, s

[0

,

).

Lemma 2.2.

For

f

L

mp

α,β

)

, then

(∫

R

2

q

λ

qm

|

φ

α,β

µ

(

h

)

1

|

q

|F

α,β

f

(

λ

)

|

q

(

λ

)

)

1

q

K

N

h

Λ

mα,β

f

p,α,β

,

where

1p

+

1q

= 1

and

m

= 0

,

1

,

2

, ...

Proof.

From (1.4), we have

F

α,β

mα,β

f

)(

λ

) =

i

m

λ

m

F

α,β

(

f

)(

λ

)

,

m

= 0

,

1

,

2

, ....

(2.1)

We use formulas (1.3) and (2.1), we conclude that

F

α,β

(

N

h

Λ

mα,β

f

)(

λ

) =

i

m

(

ψ

(α,β)

λ

(

h

) +

ψ

(α,β)

λ

(

h

)

2)

λ

m

F

α,β

(

f

)(

λ

)

,

Since

ψ

(α,β)λ

(

h

) =

φ

α,βµ

(

h

) +

i

λ

4(

α

+ 1)

sinh(2

h

)

φ

(6)

ψ

(α,β)λ

(

h

) =

φ

α,βµ

(

h

)

i

λ

4(

α

+ 1)

sinh(2

h

)

φ

α+1,β+1 µ

(

h

)

,

and

φ

α,βµ

is even, then

F

α,β

(

N

h

Λ

mα,β

f

)(

λ

) = 2

i

m

(

φ

α,βµ

(

h

)

1)

λ

m

F

α,β

(

f

)(

λ

)

.

By formula 1.2, we have the result.

Theorem 2.3.

Let

f

belong to

Lip

(

ϕ, p, α, β

)

. Then

|λ|≥r

λ

qm

|F

α,β

(

f

)(

λ

)

|

q

(

λ

) =

O

(

ϕ

(

r

−q

))

,

as

r

→ ∞

,

where

1p

+

1q

= 1

and

m

= 0

,

1

,

2

, ...

Proof.

Assume that

f

Lip

(

ϕ, p, α, β

), then we have

N

h

Λ

mα,β

f

p,α,β

=

O

(

ϕ

(

h

))

,

as

h

0

.

From Lemma 2.2, we have

R

λ

qm

|

φ

α,β

µ

(

h

)

1

|

q

|F

α,β

f

(

λ

)

|

q

(

λ

)

K

q

2

q

N

h

Λ

m α,β

f

q p,α,β

.

By (1.5) and Lemma 1.2, we get:

η 2h≤|λ|≤

η h

λ

qm

|

1

φ

α,βµ

(

h

)

|

q

|F

α,β

(

f

)(

λ

)

|

q

(

λ

)

C

1q

C

q 2

η 2h≤|λ|≤

η h

|

µh

|

2q

λ

qm

|F

α,β

(

f

)(

λ

)

|

q

(

λ

)

.

From

2hη

≤ |

λ

| ≤

ηh

we have

(

η

2

h

)

2

ρ

2

µ

2

(

η

h

)

2

ρ

2

µ

2

h

2

η

2

4

ρ

2

h

2

.

Take

h

η

, then we have

µ

2

h

2

C

3

=

C

3

(

η

).

So,

η 2h≤|λ|≤

η h

λ

qm

|

1

φ

α,βµ

(

h

)

|

q

|F

α,β

(

f

)(

λ

)

|

q

(

λ

)

C

1q

C

q 2

C

q 3

η 2h≤|λ|≤

η h

λ

qm

|F

α,β

(

f

)(

λ

)

|

q

(

λ

)

.

There exists then a positives constants

C

and

K

1

such that

η 2h≤|λ|≤

η h

λ

qm

|F

α,β

(

f

)(

λ

)

|

q

(

λ

)

C

R

λ

qm

|

1

φ

α,β

µ

(

h

)

|

q

|F

α,β

(

f

)(

λ

)

|

q

(

λ

)

K

1

ϕ

q

(

h

) =

K

1

ϕ

(

h

q

)

.

For all 0

< h <

η

. Then we have,

r≤|λ|≤2r

(7)

where

K

2

=

K

1

ϕ

(

η

q

2

−q

).

Furthermore, we obtain

|λ|≥r

λ

qm

|F

α,β

(

f

)(

λ

)

|

q

(

λ

)

=

(∫

r≤|λ|≤2r

+

2r≤|λ|≤4r

+

4r≤|λ|≤8r

+

· ··

)

λ

qm

|F

α,β

(

f

)(

λ

)

|

q

(

λ

)

K

2

ϕ

(

r

−q

) +

K

2

ϕ

((2

r

)

−q

) +

K

2

ϕ

((4

r

)

−q

) +

· · ·

K

2

ϕ

(

r

−q

) +

K

2

ϕ

(2

−q

)

ϕ

(

r

−q

) +

K

2

ϕ

((2

−q

)

2

)

ϕ

(

r

−q

) +

· · ·

K

2

ϕ

(

r

−q

)(1 +

ϕ

(2

−q

) +

ϕ

((2

−q

)

2

) +

· · ·

)

.

We have

ϕ

(2

−q

)

<

1, then

|λ|≥r

λ

qm

|F

α,β

(

f

)(

λ

)

|

q

(

λ

)

K

3

ϕ

(

r

−q

)

,

where

K

3

=

K

2

(1

ϕ

(2

−q

))

1

.

Finally, we get

|λ|≥r

λ

qm

|F

α,β

(

f

)(

λ

)

|

q

(

λ

) =

O

(

ϕ

(

r

−q

))

,

as

r

→ ∞

.

Thus, the proof is finished.

Corollary 2.4.

Let

f

L

mp

α,β

)

, and let

N

h

Λ

mα,β

f

p,α,β

=

O

(

ϕ

(

h

))

,

as

h

0

.

Then

|λ|≥r

|F

α,β

(

f

)(

λ

)

|

q

(

λ

) =

O

(

r

−qm

ϕ

(

r

−q

))

,

as

r

→ ∞

,

where

1p

+

1q

= 1

and

m

= 0

,

1

,

2

, ...

.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the referee for his valuable comments

and suggestions.

References

[1] H. Ben Mohamed and H. Mejjaoli, Distributional Jacobi-Dunkl transform and applications, Afr.Diaspora J.Math.1(2004), 24-46.

[2] H. Ben Mohamed, The Jacobi-Dunkl transform onRand the convolution product on new space of distributions, Ramanujan J.21(2010), 145-175. [3] N. Ben Salem and A. Ahmed Salem, Convolution structure associated with

the Jacobi-Dunkl operator onR, Ramanuy J.12(3) (2006), 359-378. [4] O. W. Bray and M. A.Pinsky, Growth properties of Fourier transforms

via module of continuity, Journal of Functional Analysis.255(2008), 2256-2285.

(8)

[6] T. R. Johansen, Remarks on the inverse cherednik-opdam transform on the real line, arxiv: 1502.01293v1 (2015).

[7] T. H. Koornwinder, A new proof of a Paley-Wiener type theorems for the Jacobi transform , Ark.Math.13(1975),145-159.

[8] E. C. Titchmarsh, Introduction to the theory of Fourier Integrals , Clare-don, Oxford. (1948), Komkniga, Moscow, (2005).

[9] S. M. Nikol’skii, Aproximation of functions of several variables and em-bedding theorems, (Nauka,Moscow.1977)[in Russian].

[10] B. M. Levitan, Expansion in Fourier series and integrals over Bessel func-tions, Uspekhi Math.Nauk.6(2) (1951), 102-143.

[11] A. Abouelaz, A. Belkhadir And R. Daher, An Analog of Titchmarsh’s theorem for the Jacobi-Dunkl transform in the space L2(R, A

References

Related documents

[78], presented in this literature a control strategy is proposed to regulate the voltage across the FCs at their respective reference voltage levels by swapping the switching

Results: We validated that the micelles of HA-GA@Ce6 showed stronger cell uptake in 4T1 tumor cells and lower cytotoxicity in normal cells compared with free Ce6 and GA,

8 shows the changes of total sulfur in retentate stream along with the percent weight consumption rate of cross linking agent for a balanced and specific state at

The effect of the heating fluid inlet temperature and its mass flow rate on direct contact heat exchanger design parameters (heat exchange surface area, number of

19% serve a county. Fourteen per cent of the centers provide service for adjoining states in addition to the states in which they are located; usually these adjoining states have

Field experiments were conducted at Ebonyi State University Research Farm during 2009 and 2010 farming seasons to evaluate the effect of intercropping maize with