REFERENCES
1. Hittner HM, Speer ME, Rudolph AJ, et al: Retrolental fibroplasia and vitamin E in the preterm infant-Compari-son of oral versus intramuscular:oral administration.
Pedi-atrics 1984;73:238-249
2. Johnson L, Bowen F, Herrmann N, et al: The relationship of prolonged elevation of serum vitamin E levels to neonatal bacterial sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis. Pediatr Res 1983;17:319A
3. Guggenheim MA, Ringel SP, Silverman A, et al: Progressive neuromuscular disease in children with chronic cholestasis and vitamin E deficiency: Diagnosis and treatment with a-tocopherol. J Pediatr 1982;100:51-58
In
Reply.-Sokol incorrectly asserts that we have extended our observations regarding pharmacologic vitamin E therapy. In all of our clinical studies, which include 418 high-risk preterm infants,’3 the infants have consistently main-tamed mean plasma vitamin E levels below 3.5 mg/100 mL, which are within the adult physiologic range.
Sokol is concerned that our table 3 (reference 3, page 243) includes the clinical data (excluding Apgar scores) for only the 135 infants who survived 10 weeks. Data (including Apgar scores) for all 168 infants are presented in Table 1. These data demonstrate that the two popu-lations are totally comparable despite the fact that there were more deaths among the infants with birth weight 1,00O-g in the control group (16 v six infants).
Sokol questions the recommendation that early intra-muscular (IM) vitamin E therapy should be given “on the first day of life to decrease infant mortality” because our table 4 (reference 3, page 243) does not list the sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, and intraventricular hemor-rhage data for the entire 168-infant population. The significance of decreased infant mortality for all 71 in-fants of 1,000-g birth weight enrolled on the randomized double-masked clinical trial was P .03. Despite this
statistical significance, these data for all 168 infants are presented in Table 2, and values are commensurate with the data published in reference 3 and in the parallel abstract on intraventricular hemorrhage.4 Because the control group was comparable to the treatment group without excluding early infant deaths, it is justifiable to conclude that early IM injections do decrease mortality without inducing toxicity when the mean plasma vitamin
E levels never exceed the adult physiologic maxima of 3.5 mg/100 mL.
Sokol misunderstands the four vitamin E-induced tox-icities which have been reported in high-risk preterm infants: ( 1 ) Hyperosmolar oral preparations can induce necrotizing enterocolitis.’ (2) Obtaining mean peak vi-tamin E levels 8 mg/100 mL by IM and/or intravenous
(IV)
administration6
can
induce
sepsis
and
necrotizing
enterocolitis.7 (3) Repeated oil-based IM injections8 cause local tissue necrosis and calcification.9 (4) Daily IV ad-ministration of 25 mg/kg of tocopheryl acetate in poly-sorbate 80 in parenteral alimentation solutions is asso-ciated with a syndrome consisting of ascites, hepatosple-nomegaly, cholestatic jaundice, azotemia, thrombocyto-penia, and death.’#{176}Our reported randomized double-masked clinical trial did not utilize a hyperosmolar oral preparation, administer an oil-based IM product, exceed the 3.5 mg/100 mL plasma vitamin E maxima suggested by the Food and Drug Administration or suggest IVadministration.
Sokol is correct that necrotizing enterocolitis is a spo-radic entity and that historic controls cannot be used for statistical comparison. However, the incidence of necro-tizing enterocolitis induced by hyperosmolar oral admin-istration and plasma vitamin E levels 8 mg/100 mL produced by IM and IV administration is of a completely different magnitude. The Texas Children’s Hospital Neo-natal Intensive Care Unit had a 4% to 6% incidence of
TABLE 1. Clinical Factors in Control (Oral Vitamin E) and Treatment (IM:Oral Vitamin
E) Groups in 1982 Randomized Double- Masked Study
Control Infants Treatment Infants
Enrolled 1,500 g [n
=
89] [n = 79]No. % No. %
Gestational age (wk)
27 31 34.8 23 29.1
28-29 27 30.3 30 38.0
30-31 22 24.7 21 26.6
32 9 10.1 5 6.3
Mean ± SD 28.4 ± 2.4 28.5 ± 2.1
Birth weight (g)
750 15 16.9 8 10.1
751-1,000 23 25.8 25 31.6
1,001-1,250 29 32.6 23 29.1
1,251-1,500 22 24.7 23 29.1
Mean ± SD 1,055 ± 253 1,077 ± 246
Outside births 19 21.3 15 19.0
Apgar score
1 mm (±SD) 4.7 ± 2.5 5.0 ± 2.2
5 mm (±SD) 7.3 ± 1.7 7.4 ± 1.7
Pneumothorax 9 10.1 5 6.3
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia 17 19.1 17 21.5
TABLE
2.
Controversial
Clinical
Factors
in Control
(Oral
Vitamin
E) and
Treatment
(IM:Oral Vitamin E Groups in 1982 Randomized Double-Masked StudyControl Infants Treatment Infants
Enrolled 1,500 g En= 89] [n = 79]
1,000g [n=38] [n=33]
No. % No. %
Mortality
1,500g 23 25.8 14 17.7
1,0o0
g 16 42.1 8 24.2Sepsis
1,500 g 14 15.7 11 13.9
1,0oo
g 6 15.8 7 21.2Necrotizing enterocolitis
1,500g 4 4.5 4 5.1
<1,000g 3 7.9 1 3.0
Intraventricular
hemorrhage
sl,500 g: Grade
I
13
14.6
13
16.5
Grade
II
11
12.4
4
5.1
Grade
III
4 4.5 4 5.1Grade
IV
3
3.4
1 1.3Total 31 34.8 22 27.8
1,000g:GradeI
6 15.8 5 15.2Gradell
6
15.8
4 12.1Gradelil
3
7.9
2 6.1Grade
IV
2 5.3 1 3.0Total
17 44.7 12 36.4necrotizing
enterocolitis
from
1980 to 1982. This isdis-tinct
from
the
13.4%induced
by hyperosmolar
loading
(v5.7% without an osmolar load)5 and the 30% caused by
plasma
vitamin
E levels
8
mg/100
mL
(v 4%with
plasma
vitamin
E levels
3.5
mg/100
mL).6
Our
recommendation
to
administer
three
early
IM
injections
“of the
best
available
preparation
of vitamin
E” was made
in August
1983. This recommendation wasbased on the established pharmacokinetics of aqueous
parenteral
vitamin
E administration”
(Fig
1).Clearly,
IM injections
of the alcohol
are superior
to those
of the
slowly
hydrolyzed
acetate.
However,
subsequent
to IM or
IV injections,
measurable
plasma
tocopherol
levels
are
obtained
for both
alcohol
and acetate
preparations.
Our
clinical trial3 demonstrated a rapid elevation of plasma
vitamin
E levels
by
aqueous
tocopherol,
Ephynal
IM,
used
in combination
with
oral
tocopheryl
acetate
(100mg/kg/d) in MCT (medium-chain triglycerides) oil as
compared
with
only
oral
administration
(Fig
2, A).3 It
was
hoped
that
the
preterm
infants’
deficient
plasma
levels could be quickly elevated to adult physiologic
plasma
vitamin
E levels
utilizing
the
only
commercially
available
IM vitamin
E preparation.
However,
in April
1984, data
became
available
that
demonstrated
poor
ab-sorption
and
hydrolysis
of the oil-based
tocopheryl
ace-tate,
E-ferol
IM, used in combination
with oral tocopheryl
acetate (100 mg/kg/d) in Tween 80 with propylene glycol as compared with only the oral administration (Fig 2,B).”
Additionally, in April 1984, Bhat and Braun’3”4 pub-lished abstracts that predict lack of efficacy in suppress-ing the development of severe retinopathy of prematurity for IV as compared with IM vitamin E administration
due to significantly
delayed
and decreased
retinal
uptake
following IV administration (Fig 3). A fast increase in retinal levels of tocopherol is critical because the etiology of retinopathy of prematurity is initiated by early bio-chemical events that are seen ultrastructurally as gap junction increases between adjacent spindle cells as early as 4 days of life.’5 This altered ionic coupling changes spindle cells from endothelial precursors to sites of syn-thesis and secretion of angiogenic factors. Vitamin E suppression of gap junction formation is dependent upon uptake of the antioxidant into retinal membranes.
The dose-response curves for oral (Fig 4, A),’6 IM (Fig
4,
B),’7
and IV (Fig 4, C)’8 vitamin E administration topreterm high-risk infants are distinctly different. Oral vitamin E can be administered either as the alcohol or acetate preparation (Fig 4, A), but good absorption of IM and IV vitamin E is dependent on aqueous alcohol prep-arations (Fig 4, B and C). The vehicle has significance because of induced toxicities [oral (hyperosmolar related necrotizing enterocolitis) and IM (local tissue necrosis and calcification)] and maximized absorption [oral (MCT oil) and IM (aqueous base)].
Therefore, the preparations commercially available were suboptimal when administered to the high-risk pre-term infant for the following reasons: oral Aquasol E is hyperosmolar; E-ferol IM is an oil-based acetate (has been recalled); and E-ferol IV is an acetate in polysorbate 80 (has been recalled). The pediatric community should request their hospital pharmacists to prepare oral vitamin E in MCT oil’9 as recommended in our article’ and await
FDA
approval
of an IM aqueous
alcohol
vitamin
E. On
prematur-10
8 7 E 0 E 0 0 0 I-E ‘I, (0Single
Dose:
5mg/kg(aqueous)
6
5
4
3
2
1
0::::
-- .016
24
9
REFERENCES
HELEN M. HITFNER, MD
Department of Pediatrics and Cullen Eye Institute Baylor College of Medicine Houston, TX 77030
8
Time
(hours)
AIcohoI
IV. jAcetate
Fig 1. Pharmacokinetics of aqueous parenteral vitamin E administration. Resultant plasma tocopherol levels are shown for the first 24-hour period following single 5 mg/ kg-dose to dogs of: intramuscular (IM) tocopherol (open circles with solid line); (IV) tocopherol (solid circles with solid line); IM tocopheryl acetate (open circles with dashed line); and IV tocopheryl acetate (solid circles with dashed line). Data from Newmark et al.’1
ity) regarding vitamin E administration (emphasizing the first week of life). It is hoped that this preparation (aqueous alcohol) will soon be approved for IM use in the high-risk preterm infant to suppress the development of severe retinopathy of prematurity,’3’20” to decrease mortality,3 and to decrease the incidence and severity of intraventricular hemorrhage.4’23 Further, the term par-enteral to include IM and IV preparations should be avoided, as IV administration, although safe for the high-risk preterm infant in adult physiologic doses,24 is un-warranted and nonefficacious in preventing the develop-ment of severe retinopathy of prematurity.
1. Hittner HM, Godio LB, Ruldoph AJ, et al: Retrolental fibroplasia: Efficacy of vitamin E in a double-blind clinical study of preterm infants. N Erigi J Med 1981;305:1365 2. Hittner HM, Godio LB, Speer ME, et al: Retrolental
fibro-plasia: Further clinical evidence and ultrastructural support for efficacy of vitamin E in the preterm infant. Pediatrics
1983;71:423
3. Hittner HM, Speer ME, Rudolph AJ, et al: Retrolental fibroplasia and vitamin E in the preterm infant-Compari-son of oral versus intramuscular:oral administration.
Pedi-atrics 1984;73:238
4. Speer ME, Blifeld C, Rudolph AJ, et al: Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) & vitamin E (VE) in very low birth weight infants: Efficacy of early IM administration. Pediatr
Res 1984;18:383A
5. Finer NN, Peters KL, Hayek Z, et al: Vitamin E and necrotizing enterocolitis. Pediatrics 1984;73:387
6. Sobel 5, Gueriguian J, Troendle G, et al: Vitamin E in retrolental fibroplasia, letter. N Engi J Med 1982;306:867 7. Johnson L, Bowen F, Herrmann N, et al: The relationship
of prolonged elevation of serum vitamin E levels to neonatal bacterial sepsis (SEP) & necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).
Pediatr Res 1983;17:319A
8. Hittner HM, Kretzer FL, Rudolph AJ, et al: Vitamin E in retrolental fibroplasia, letter. N Engi J Med 1983;309:669 9. Smith IJ, Buchanan MFG, Goss I, et al: Vitamin E in
retrolental fibroplasia, letter. N Engi J Med 1983;309:669 10. Lorch V, Murphy MD, Hutcheson RH, et al: Unusual
syn-drome with fatalities among premature infants: Association with a new intravenous vitamin E product. MMWR 1984;33:198
11. Newmark HL, Pool W, Bauernfeind JC, et al: Biopharma-ceutic factors in parenteral administration of vitamin E. J
Pharm Sci 1975;64:655
12. Pantoja A, Ukrainski C, Belenky D, et al: Vitamin E (VE) kinetics in infants <1500 grams: Intramuscular (IM) vs oral administration. Pediatr Res 1984;18:157A
13. Bhat R, Braun RJ: Pharmacokinetics of exogenous vitamin E in the newborn. Pediatr Res 1984;18:149A
14. Bhat R, Braun RI: Retinal and tissue vitamin E kinetics in the newborn kitten following vitamin E administration.
Pediatr Res 1984;18:149A
15. Kretzer FL, Mehta RS, Johnson AT, et al: Vitamin E protects against retinopathy of prematurity through action on spindle cells. Nature 1984;309:793
16. Bell EF, Brown EJ, Milner R, et al: Vitamin E absorption in small premature infants. Pediatrics 1979;63:830
17. Colburn WA, Ehrenkranz RA: Pharmacokinetics of a single intramuscular injection of vitamin E to premature neonates.
Pediatr Pharm 1983;3:7
18. Myers PR, Quissell BJ, Peterson RG: Pharmacology of intravenous vitamin E in the very low birthweight (VLBW) newborn. Pediatr Res 1984;18:157A
19. Williams ML, Oski FA: Vitamin E status of infants fed formula containing medium-chain triglycerides. J Pediatr 1980;96:70
20. Johnson L, Schaffer D, Boggs TR: The premature infant: Vitamin E deficiency and retrolental fibroplasia. Am J Clin
Nutr 1974;27:1158
21. Finer NN, Grant G, Schindler RF, et al: Effect of intramus-cular vitamin E on frequency and severity of retrolental fibroplasia: A controlled trial. Lancet 1982;1:1087
22. Finer NN, Schindler RF, Peters KL, et al: Vitamin E and retrolental fibroplasia: Improved visual outcome with early vitamin E. Ophthalmology 1983;90:428
E
8
E
0
-C
0
E
(0
a-4
3
2
1
0
r4P
L .1. I I j___
0 1 2 3 4 6
t t t t
15ASAP 10 10 10
5
-J
1
I I I I I I I i
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I t t f f $
5OASAP 20 20 20 20 20 20
80r-lime (days)
Fig 2.
Comparison
of plasma
tocopherol
levels
for two protocols
of intramuscular
(IM):
oral
voral
vitamin
E administration
in high-risk
preterm
infants.
Plasma
tocopherol
levels
are
shown
for the
first 7 days of life. Hatched area represents adult physiologicrange
for vitamin
E. A, IM Ephynal
+oral
TCH
(Texas
Children’s
Hospital)-E
produces
significantly
higher
plasma
tocopherol
levels
than
oral TCH-E
alone.
First
dose of
15 mg/kg of Ephynal should be given as soon as possible following delivery. B, IM E-ferol + oral
Aquasol
E does
not produce
higher
plasma
tocopherol
levels
than
oral
Aquasol
E alone.
The
IM E-ferol
injections
are much
higher
on a milligram
per kilogram
basis
than
the IM
Ephynal
injections;
however,
oil-based
acetate
is less well utilized
than
aqueous
alcohol.
Data
from
Hittner
et al3 (A) and
Pantoja
et al”
(B).
- * Ephynal#{174} 100mg/kg I .V. ---- = Ephynal#{174}100mg/kg I .M.
(aqueous alcohol) (aqueous alcohol)
Biochemical events
r
initiating ROP300 ‘ Ultrastructural
alterations
documented in ROP
200
100
A
E
8
E
0
w
-C
0
(0
E
(0
a-60
40
20
0
B
C
.
E
0
-C 0.
0
I-(0
C
4)
lime (days)
0 1 2 3 4 5 0’
I I I
3 4 5
A
- - Ephynal#{174}(-0. . mq/kq I .M. alcoholin water) and ICH-E
---- . ICH-E (lOOmq/kq oral acetate in
MCI oil)
B
- . E_ferol#{174}(___.. . mg/kg I .M. acetate..
#{174}
in oil) and Aquasol E
---- . Aquasol E#{174}(100mg/kg oral acetate in
Iween 80 with Propylene glycol)
Fig 3.
Comparison of plasma v retinal tocopherol levels in kitten following intravenous(IV)
and
intramuscular
(IM)
administration
of 100 mg/kg
of Ephynal
shown
for first
5
days of life. A, Plasma tocopherol levels are shown to be adequate following IV or IM
administration;
however,
kinetics
for
IV is less
ideal
than
for
IM
administration.
B,
Retinal
tocopherol
levels
are
twice
as high
in one
third
the
time
for
IM
than
for IV
administration.
Thus,
because
of plasma
pharmacokinetics
and
resultant
retinal
levels,
IM administration
of vitamin
E is preferred
for altering
biochemical
events
initiating
Less
than 40% absorption with biliaryand pancreatic
secretions
present.E
E
0
4)
-C
0
U
0
(0 E
(I’
(0
a-
8-
6-
4-
2’-0
(T
0
24
48
0
24
48
0
I I I I
48
24
10
-A
Single
P.O. Dose
25mg/kg
(alcohol
or acetate)
B
Single I.M.DoseEphynal#{174}2Omg/kg
(aqueous alcohol)
C
Single I.V.Dose
Ephynal#{174}
10mg/kg
(aqueous alcohol)
Time (hours)
Fig 4. Comparison of plasma tocopherol levels achieved by oral, intramuscular (IM) and intravenous (IV) administration of tocopherol in high-risk preterm infants for first 48 hours following single dose. A, Oral administration of 25 mg/kg of either alcohol or acetate of vitamin E does not raise plasma tocopherol level to adult physiologic range (hatched area) because of poor absorption in preterm small intestine. B, IM administration of 20 mg/kg of Ephynal produces plasma tocopherol levels peaking at 6 mg/100 ml and falling slowly (half-life of 44 hours). C, IV administration of 10 mg/kg of Ephynal yields plasma tocopherol levels that approach 9 mg/100 mL and then rapidly decline. These pharmaco-kinetics can be utilized to plan IM:oral protocols for the preterm infant. IV administration is not recommended. Data from Bell et al’6 (A), Colburn et al’7 (B), and Myers et al’8 (C).
effect of vitamin E (DL-alpha-tocopherol) against intraven-tricular hemorrhage in premature babies. Br Med J
1983;287:81
24. Phelps DL, Rosenbaum A, Leake RD, et al: Safety of intra-vascular tocopherol in a randomized double blind trial in premature infants. Pediatr Res 1984;18:158A
A Pediatrician’s
Program
for the Prevention
of Dental
Caries
in the First Years
of Life
To the
Editor.-Inasmuch as infants and children usually do not visit a pedodontist or a dentist in the first few years of life, I have recently undertaken a dental prophylactic program.
The program consists ofthree approaches: (1) Fluoride supplementation is started in the first 2 weeks of life whenever the infant is ready to use formulas, or when well water with inadequate fluoride content is used. This consists of 0.25 mg of fluoride with the usual vitamin drops and later vitamin tablets with fluoride until the infant is seen by the family dentist. (2) As soon as the
first incisor tooth erupts adequately, the mothers are instructed to brush after dinner and later after breakfast either with no toothpaste or with a touch of fluoride-containing gel toothpaste. No bottle is permitted once the teeth have been brushed. Parental help is necessary for the younger children. (3) An educational program toward reducing sugar intake is instituted with the aid of instructional sheets. The parents are told to show this information to the grandparents also.
Using this program, the first 100 children were ana-lyzed after their first dental visit. The result was that 94% of them were caries-free at 3 to 4 years of age. A second gratifying finding was that with early establish-ment of the brushing habit, 92% of the children liked or loved to brush their teeth.
All six of the children with caries gave a history of moderately heavy sugar intake.
I urge
other
pediatricians
to use such
a program
and
to distribute the pamphlets “Your Child’s Teeth” and “The Care of Children’s Teeth” (obtainable from the American Dental Association, 211 E Chicago Aye, Chi-cago, IL 60611) in their practices. Copies of my instruc-tion sheets are available on written request to me.
SUMNER HAGLER, MD