• No results found

Mobile Combustion CO2 Emissions Calculation Tool

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Mobile Combustion CO2 Emissions Calculation Tool"

Copied!
94
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Summary of CO2 Emissions From Mobile Sources12/05/2008

WRI-WBCSD GHG Protocol Initiative

Tip: Do not edit this page. This page displays totals that come from the detailed worksheets you can access by clicking on the sheet tabs below.

Source of Emissions

Road Calculated from fuel use: 0.0 mt

Vehicles Calculated from distance: 0.0 mt

TrainsCalculated from fuel use: 0.0 mt

Calculated from distance: 0.0 mt

ShipsCalculated from fuel use: 0.0 mt

Calculated from distance: 0.0 mt

AircraftCalculated from fuel use: 0.0 mt

Calculated from distance: 0.0 mt

Total Emissions: 0.0 mt

Home Page: Mobile Combustion CO2 Emissions Calculation Tool. January 2005. Version 1.3

Summary of CO2 Emissions (in metric tonnes CO2)

Edit details Edit details Edit details Edit details Edit details Edit details Edit details Edit details

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)

Summary of CO2 Emissions From Mobile Sources12/05/2008

### ### ### ###

(7)

Introduction to Worksheets for CO2 Emissions from Mobile Sources

###

###

This brief introduction supplements the guidance document, "Fossil Fuel Combustion in Mobile Sources: Guidelines",

###

Please read the accompanying guidance document before using these worksheets.

###

The intellectual property rights of this calculation tool belong to WRI and WBCSD, unless stated otherwise in any of the tools.

###

Please cite the orginial reference when using this tool.

###

###

Purpose and domain of this section

###

Assumptions

###

The combustion of hydrocarbon fuels produces carbon dioxide (CO2), water vapor, trace amounts of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide

###

(N2O) and ash or soot (from incomplete combustion). This workbook makes a simplifying assumption that the combustion of carbon

###

is 100% complete, whereby all the carbon in fuel is converted to CO2. By itself, this assumption results in an approximately 1%

###

overestimate of CO2 emissions from combustion. This overestimate is offset by a second assumption that by itself would result in a

###

roughly 1% underestimate of global warming impact. The second assumption is that the emissions of CH4 and N20 from mobile combustion

###

are so small and uncertain that they may be ignored in the calcuation. Each gram of CH4 and N2O has a greater impact on climate than a

###

gram of CO2. Even so, the amounts emitted during combustion are so small, and the factors for these emissions are so uncertain, that there

###

is little benefit in calculating their global warming impact. (Processes other than combustion do produce significant amounts of CH4 and N20,

###

and these have non-trivial global warming impacts.) The combined effect of these assumptions is likely to alter results by less than 0.5%,

###

a variance that will in most cases be negligible.

###

###

Companies that wish to calculate global warming from N2O and CH4 can do so as a last step, by multiplying their total CO2 emissions

###

with an appropriate small percentage. This is justified because the ratio of N2O and CH4 to CO2 emissions from combustion varies little

###

across fuels and equipment.

###

###

Calculation Approaches

###

###

###

approach or approaches which make best use of available data. When fuel use data is available, it is usually more reliable than distance data.

###

If fuel use data and distance data are of equal quality, the fuel use data should be used (fuel composition varies less than vehicle efficiency).

###

If distance data and fuel economy factors are known, use the calculator provided on the 'fuel use' worksheet to calculate fuel consumption.

###

Approaches can be combined, but to avoid double counting do not enter the same activity twice.

###

These guidelines and worksheets are intended to help all companies calculate their direct and/or indirect CO2 emissions from mobile sources.

###

Default or average-case factors are included for your information as a possible alternative if custom emission factors are not available.

###

If mobile sources are a significant source of direct emissions for your organization, and your fuel records are not accurate, it is

###

recommended that you compile emission factors that accurately reflect the characteristics of the equipment and technology you are operating.

###

Note that the default emissions per distance factors were developed in the United States and/or Europe, and may

###

###

###

###

from Mobile Sources

###

###

Fuel used

Distance

Two calculation approaches are provided in these worksheets. The first calculates emissions based on amount of fuel consumed.

The second calculates emissions based on distance traveled or equipment activity, i.e. truck kilometers traveled. Companies should use the

not be accurate for countries with different traffic conditions, vehicle sizes, and average number of passengers per vehicle.

(8)

###

Traveled

###

Fuel per distance

###

Fuel used

factor

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

emissions

emissions

emissions

###

per fuel

per fuel

per distance

###

factor

factor

factor

###

###

###

Emissions

Emissions

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

Suggested Sequence

###

1 Make a back-up copy of this workbook, in its blank unused state.

###

2 Determine your direct and indirect emission sources from mobile combustion. If you have both direct and indirect emissions,

###

make two copies of the workbook for accounting them separately.

###

3 Review the default values proposed for emissions factors, and enter any different local default emission factors or

###

custom values that best represent your emission sources. Check coal factors since they vary widely by country.

###

4 Complete each of the applicable worksheets, filling in relevant light green cells and optional values in cells shaded light blue. To add a data

###

entry row similar to an existing row, select the existing row, then click on the Add a Row button. A new row will be inserted below

###

the row you selected. Be certain to change user-entered values in the new row.

###

Worksheets are color coded but may be printed in black and white.

###

5 Review the Summary on the "Home" page. Totals there should automatically reflect totals computed on each worksheet.

###

Print the Summary page. Make a back-up copy of this completed workbook.

###

###

Top Tips

###

1 Color Scheme:

Help

Enter data

Optional data entry

Auto calculated

###

Labels:

Warnings

green cells

light blue cells

value in gray cells

###

2

###

3

Blue line shows calculation sequence for Based on Fuels Worksheet

Brown

line shows caculation sequence for Based on Distance Worksheet

Dotted

line shows emission factors built into the calculation of emissions per distance factor

Click on "Twisties"

6 4

to expand and collapse sections.

(9)

###

layout and formulas will be inserted beneath the row you selected. Be sure to change the user-supplied values!

###

4 Navigate from one spreadsheet to another using the tabs at the bottom of your screen.

###

5 To print in black and white (without shadings) check the appropriate box in the Sheet tab of the Page Setup command in the File Menu.

###

6 To fit the active section of the workbook to your screen, adjust the zoom percentage shown in the Stardard icon bar.

###

###

Acknowledgements

###

This workbook was developed by David Cross of RPM Systems, The RETEC Group, Inc., with contributions from Gwen Parker/WRI,

###

Pankaj Bhatia/WRI, Michael Gillenwater/US-EPA, Vincent Camobreco/US-EPA, Matthew Addison/Nexant Inc, and project team members

###

from WRI/WBCSD. All intellectual property rights belong to GHG Protocol Initiative. Please cite the original reference whenever using this tool.

###

While the workbook is largely self explanatory, for questions or suggestions on workbook mechanics, contact [email protected].

###

For comments on workbook content, contact Pankaj Bhatia at [email protected].

###

Please visit the GHG Protocol Initiative at www.ghgprotocol.org for other GHG calculation tools.

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

(10)

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

(11)

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

(12)

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

(13)

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

(14)

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

(15)

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

(16)

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

(17)

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

(18)

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

(19)

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

(20)

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

(21)

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

(22)

Introduction to Worksheets for CO2 Emissions from Mobile Sources

This brief introduction supplements the guidance document, "Fossil Fuel Combustion in Mobile Sources: Guidelines",

The combustion of hydrocarbon fuels produces carbon dioxide (CO2), water vapor, trace amounts of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide

(N2O) and ash or soot (from incomplete combustion). This workbook makes a simplifying assumption that the combustion of carbon

is 100% complete, whereby all the carbon in fuel is converted to CO2. By itself, this assumption results in an approximately 1%

overestimate of CO2 emissions from combustion. This overestimate is offset by a second assumption that by itself would result in a

roughly 1% underestimate of global warming impact. The second assumption is that the emissions of CH4 and N20 from mobile combustion

are so small and uncertain that they may be ignored in the calcuation. Each gram of CH4 and N2O has a greater impact on climate than a

gram of CO2. Even so, the amounts emitted during combustion are so small, and the factors for these emissions are so uncertain, that there

is little benefit in calculating their global warming impact. (Processes other than combustion do produce significant amounts of CH4 and N20,

and these have non-trivial global warming impacts.) The combined effect of these assumptions is likely to alter results by less than 0.5%,

Companies that wish to calculate global warming from N2O and CH4 can do so as a last step, by multiplying their total CO2 emissions

with an appropriate small percentage. This is justified because the ratio of N2O and CH4 to CO2 emissions from combustion varies little

approach or approaches which make best use of available data. When fuel use data is available, it is usually more reliable than distance data.

If fuel use data and distance data are of equal quality, the fuel use data should be used (fuel composition varies less than vehicle efficiency).

If distance data and fuel economy factors are known, use the calculator provided on the 'fuel use' worksheet to calculate fuel consumption.

These guidelines and worksheets are intended to help all companies calculate their direct and/or indirect CO2 emissions from mobile sources.

Default or average-case factors are included for your information as a possible alternative if custom emission factors are not available.

If mobile sources are a significant source of direct emissions for your organization, and your fuel records are not accurate, it is

recommended that you compile emission factors that accurately reflect the characteristics of the equipment and technology you are operating.

Note that the default emissions per distance factors were developed in the United States and/or Europe, and may

Two calculation approaches are provided in these worksheets. The first calculates emissions based on amount of fuel consumed.

or equipment activity, i.e. truck kilometers traveled. Companies should use the

(23)

Determine your direct and indirect emission sources from mobile combustion. If you have both direct and indirect emissions,

Review the default values proposed for emissions factors, and enter any different local default emission factors or

custom values that best represent your emission sources. Check coal factors since they vary widely by country.

Complete each of the applicable worksheets, filling in relevant light green cells and optional values in cells shaded light blue. To add a data

entry row similar to an existing row, select the existing row, then click on the Add a Row button. A new row will be inserted below

Review the Summary on the "Home" page. Totals there should automatically reflect totals computed on each worksheet.

Auto calculated

Default values

value in gray cells

light yellow cells

(24)

layout and formulas will be inserted beneath the row you selected. Be sure to change the user-supplied values!

To print in black and white (without shadings) check the appropriate box in the Sheet tab of the Page Setup command in the File Menu.

To fit the active section of the workbook to your screen, adjust the zoom percentage shown in the Stardard icon bar.

This workbook was developed by David Cross of RPM Systems, The RETEC Group, Inc., with contributions from Gwen Parker/WRI,

Pankaj Bhatia/WRI, Michael Gillenwater/US-EPA, Vincent Camobreco/US-EPA, Matthew Addison/Nexant Inc, and project team members

from WRI/WBCSD. All intellectual property rights belong to GHG Protocol Initiative. Please cite the original reference whenever using this tool.

While the workbook is largely self explanatory, for questions or suggestions on workbook mechanics, contact [email protected].

(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)

Part 1. Emissions Calculated from Fuel Used: All Modes of Transport

Note: Use this worksheet to calculate your emissions from amount of fuel consumed.

Optional Calculator

A

B

C

D

E1

E2

F

G1

G2

I

1,000

= Distance traveled

Fuel used

Energy used

Emissions Factor

Emissions

0

= miles per gallon

Type of Fuel Used

GJ per Fuel Unit

GJ energy

kg CO2 per GJ

metric tonnes

OR

Amount of

Fuel

Fuel

Default

Custom

Used

Default

Custom

H =FxG/1000

30

= litres per 100 km

Source Description

fuel used

Units

Type

GJ/unit

GJ/unit

F = B x E

kg CO2/GJ

CO2/GJ

Metric ton CO2

300

litres used

Road transportation

0.00

0.0

Sample fleet

30,000.00 US gals

Gasoline

0.13

3,906.12

69.250

270.5

US gals

Gasoline

0.13

0.00

69.250

0.0

US gals

Gasoline

0.13

0.00

69.250

0.0

US gals

Gasoline

0.13

0.00

69.250

0.0

US gals

Gasoline

0.13

0.00

69.250

0.0

Imp. gals

Gasoline

0.16

0.00

69.250

0.0

litres

Gasoline

0.03

0.00

69.250

0.0

litres

Gasoline

0.03

0.00

69.250

0.0

Metric tonnes

Gasoline

43.57

0.00

69.250

0.0

US gals

Diesel

0.14

0.00

74.010

0.0

Imp. gals

Diesel

0.17

0.00

74.010

0.0

litres

Diesel

0.04

0.00

74.010

0.0

Metric tonnes

Diesel

44.17

0.00

74.010

0.0

lbs.

CNG

0.0228

0.00

56.06

0.0

kg

CNG

0.0523

0.00

56.06

0.0

lbs.

LPG

0.0209

0.00

63.2000

0.0

kg

LPG

0.0460

0.00

63.2000

0.0

US gals

LPG

0.0942

0.00

63.2000

0.0

litres

LPG

0.0249

0.00

63.2000

0.0

Rail transportation

0.00

0.0

Water transportation

0.00

0.0

Aircraft

0.00

0.0

Total

0.0

0.0

NOTES

Home/Summary

(53)

Part 2. Emissions Calculated from Distance Traveled, All Modes of Transport

Note: Use this worksheet to calculate your emissions if you have activity data only for the distance travelled. Optional Calculator kg CO2

A B C D E1 E2 F Vehicle fuel efficiency GasDiesel

Transportation Activity CO2 emissions miles per gallon 24 0.38 0.43

Amount kg CO2 per unit Total emissions kg CO2 per mile

of Default Custom metric tonnes liters /100 km 3.9 0.09 0.11

Source Description Transport description Activity Activity unit CO2/unitCO2/unit F = CxE/1000 kg CO2 pr km

Road transportation activity 0.0

Measurements in Miles: Note: Gallons are US Gallons

hybrid auto 56 mpg 4.2 l/100km vehicle miles 0.1610 0.0 small gas auto 29 mpg 8.1 l/100km vehicle miles 0.3109 0.0 med gas auto 23 mpg 10.2 l/100km vehicle miles 0.3920 0.0 large gas auto 19 mpg 12.4 l/100km vehicle miles 0.4746 0.0 LPG automobile vehicle miles 0.2865 0.0 diesel auto 24 mpg 9.8 l/100km vehicle miles 0.4330 0.0 gas light truck 14 mpg 16.8 l/100km vehicle miles 0.6440 0.0 gas heavy truck 6 mpg 39.2 l/100km vehicle miles 1.5028 0.0 diesel light truck 15 mpg 15.7 l/100km vehicle miles 0.6928 0.0 diesel heavy truck 7 mpg 33.6 l/100km vehicle miles 1.4847 0.0 light motorcycle 60 mpg 3.9 l/100km vehicle miles 0.1503 0.0

your vehicle 0.0See calculator above to obtain kg per mile 0.0from fuel efficiency hybrid auto 56 mpg 4.2 l/100km passenger miles 0.0895 0.0 small gas auto 29 mpg 8.1 l/100km passenger miles 0.1727 0.0 med gas auto 23 mpg 10.2 l/100km passenger miles 0.2178 0.0 large gas auto 19 mpg 12.4 l/100km passenger miles 0.2636 0.0 LPG automobile passenger miles 0.1591 0.0 diesel auto 24 mpg 9.8 l/100km passenger miles 0.2406 0.0 gas light truck 14 mpg 16.8 l/100km passenger miles 0.3578 0.0 gas heavy truck 6 mpg 39.2 l/100km passenger miles 0.8349 0.0 diesel light truck 15 mpg 15.7 l/100km passenger miles 0.3849 0.0 diesel heavy truck 7 mpg 33.6 l/100km passenger miles 0.8248 0.0 light motorcycle 60 mpg 3.9 l/100km passenger miles 0.0835 0.0 bus (diesel)- long distance passenger miles 0.0781 0.0 bus (diesel)- urban transit passenger miles 0.2997 0.0 road freight short ton miles 0.1033 0.0 (other car mpg below) 0.0

Measurements in Kilometers:

hybrid auto 56 mpg 4.2 l/100km vehicle kilometers 0.1001 0.0 small gas auto 29 mpg 8.1 l/100km vehicle kilometers 0.1932 0.0 med gas auto 23 mpg 10.2 l/100km vehicle kilometers 0.2436 0.0 large gas auto 19 mpg 12.4 l/100km vehicle kilometers 0.2949 0.0 LPG automobile vehicle kilometers 0.1780 0.0 diesel auto 24 mpg 9.8 l/100km vehicle kilometers 0.2691 0.0 0 gas light truck 14 mpg 16.8 l/100km vehicle kilometers 0.4002 0.0 0 gas heavy truck 6 mpg 39.2 l/100km vehicle kilometers 0.9338 0.0 0 diesel light truck 15 mpg 15.7 l/100km vehicle kilometers 0.4305 0.0 0 diesel heavy truck 7 mpg 33.6 l/100km vehicle kilometers 0.9226 0.0 0 light motorcycle 60 mpg 3.9 l/100km vehicle kilometers 0.0934 0.0

your vehicle 0.0See calculator above to obtain kg per km 0.0from fuel efficiency hybrid auto 56 mpg 4.2 l/100km passenger kilometers 0.0556 0.0 small gas auto 29 mpg 8.1 l/100km passenger kilometers 0.1073 0.0 med gas auto 23 mpg 10.2 l/100km passenger kilometers 0.1353 0.0 large gas auto 19 mpg 12.4 l/100km passenger kilometers 0.1638 0.0 LPG automobile passenger kilometers 0.0989 0.0 diesel auto 24 mpg 9.8 l/100km passenger kilometers 0.1495 0.0 gas light truck 14 mpg 16.8 l/100km passenger kilometers 0.2223 0.0 gas heavy truck 6 mpg 39.2 l/100km passenger kilometers 0.5188 0.0 diesel light truck 15 mpg 15.7 l/100km passenger kilometers 0.2392 0.0 diesel heavy truck 7 mpg 33.6 l/100km passenger kilometers 0.5125 0.0 light motorcycle 60 mpg 3.9 l/100km passenger kilometers 0.0519 0.0 bus (diesel)- long distance 0 passenger kilometers 0.0485 0.0 bus (diesel)- urban transit 0 passenger kilometers 0.1862 0.0 road freight Metric tonne kilometers 0.0720 0.0 0.0 Rail transportation 0.0 diesel locomotive passenger miles 0.1719 0.0 diesel locomotive short ton miles 0.0287 0.0 diesel locomotive passenger kilometers 0.1068 0.0 diesel locomotive Metric tonne kilometers 0.0200 0.0 electric locomotive passenger miles 0.3437 0.0 electric locomotive short ton miles 0.0574 0.0 electric locomotive passenger kilometers 0.2136 0.0 electric locomotive Metric tonne kilometers 0.0400 0.0 coal locomotive passenger miles 0.2238 0.0 coal locomotive short ton miles 0.0374 0.0 coal locomotive passenger kilometers 0.1391 0.0 coal locomotive Metric tonne kilometers 0.0260 0.0 UK Rail passenger miles 0.0966 0.0 UK Rail passenger kilometers 0.0600 0.0 US Intercity Rail (e.g. Amtrak) passenger miles 0.1909 0.0 US Intercity Rail (e.g. Amtrak) passenger kilometers 0.1186 0.0 US Transit Rail (e.g subway, tram) passenger miles 0.1604 0.0 US Transit Rail (e.g subway, tram) passenger kilometers 0.0997 0.0 US Commuter Rail passenger miles 0.1649 0.0 US Commuter Rail passenger kilometers 0.1025 0.0 Canadian Rail passenger miles 0.1662 0.0 Canadian Rail passenger kilometers 0.1033 0.0 0.0 Boat transportation Water transportation 0.0 Aircraft (distance figures are for one-stop flights, in land miles, not nautical miles- check your source) 0.0Optional Calculation Table

Use optional calculator to the right for calculating miles traveled based on number of flights (short, medium or long) # of Flights units unit description Total acrtivity units

short haul (<452 km) <281 miles passenger land miles 0.2897 0.0 1 passenger land miles 0 (copy to green column to left) medium haul (452 to 1600 km) 281 to 994 miles passenger land miles 0.2028 0.0 1 passenger land miles 0 long haul (>1600 km) >994 miles passenger land miles 0.1770 0.0 1 passenger land miles 0 short haul (<452 km) <281 miles short ton land miles 2.3062 0.0 0 tons 0 medium haul (452 to 1600 km) 281 to 994 miles short ton land miles 1.1677 0.0 0 tons 0 long haul (>1600 km) >994 miles short ton land miles 0.8320 0.0 0 tons 0 short haul (<452 km) <281 miles passenger land km 0.1800 0.0 1 passenger land miles 0 medium haul (452 to 1600 km) 281 to 994 miles passenger land km 0.1260 0.0 1 passenger land miles 0 long haul (>1600 km) >994 miles passenger land km 0.1100 0.0 1 passenger land miles 0 short haul (<452 km) <281 miles Metric tonne kilometers 1.5800 0.0 0 metric tons 0 medium haul (452 to 1600 km) 281 to 994 miles Metric tonne kilometers 0.8000 0.0 0 metric tons 0 long haul (>1600 km) >994 miles Metric tonne kilometers 0.5700 0.0 0 metric tons 0 flight of 300 km 186 miles passenger land km 0.2180 0.0 1 passenger land miles 0 flight of 900 km 559 miles passenger land km 0.1420 0.0 1 passenger land miles 0 nonstop flight 2719 km 1690 miles passenger land km 0.1170 0.0 1 passenger land miles 0 See more factors below 0 0 passenger land km 0.1170 0.0 1 passenger land miles =??*N98*O98

0 0.0

Last row above totals enter no data here

Total for indirect emissions calculated from distance traveled 0.0

Emissions factors for rail travel Type of Train

0.0600 0.0966 1 km equals 0.62 miles 0.1186 0.1909 1 mile equals 1.61 km 0.0997 0.1604

To convert from lbs to kg, multiply by 0.1025 0.1649 0.45 0.1033 0.1662

Air Travel factors for flights with different distances [Based on Emission Factors provided by DEFRA (Table 9, Environmental Reporting - Guidelines for Company Reporting on GHG Emissions) for short haul and long haul flights]

Passenger calculations for bus travel based on ridership (DEFRA & US - DOT)

Average miles per gallon, 6.7 per US DOT table VM1, 1999 10 kg CO2/gallon (DEFRA says 9.99, a lower estimate than some others) Assumed urban AverageAssumed intercity

Miles per gallon: 4 6 6.7 9

Grams CO2/mile, per bus 2500.0 1666.7 1492.5 1111.1 g/ psgr Mile, 5 pasengers 500.0 333.3 298.5 222.2

g/ psgr Mile, 10 pasengers 250.0 166.7 149.3 111.1 shaded cells approximate estimates derived from Btu/passenger mile estimates from US DOT g/ psgr Mile, 15 pasengers 166.7 111.1 99.5 74.1 inter-city: 48.5 g CO2 per passenger km

g/ psgr Mile, 20 pasengers 125.0 83.3 74.6 55.6 urban: 186.2 g CO2 per passenger km g/ psgr Mile, 30 pasengers 83.3 55.6 49.8 37.0 g/ psgr km, 5 pasengers 310.7 207.1 185.5 138.1 g/ psgr km, 10 pasengers 155.3 103.6 92.7 69.0 g/ psgr km, 15 pasengers 103.6 69.0 61.8 46.0 g/ psgr km, 20 pasengers 77.7 51.8 46.4 34.5 g/ psgr km, 30 pasengers 51.8 34.5 30.9 23.0

Miles per gallon for typical vehicles, EPA/USA Other default emission factors are from: IPCC. 1997. Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Reference Manual

kg CO2 per passenger km kg CO2 per passenger mile UK Rail1

US Intercity Rail2 (i.e., Amtrak) US Transit Rail3 (e.g., subway, tram) US Commuter Rail4

Canadian Rail5

1. Source: Railtrack http://www.railtrack.co.uk/our_business/environment/benefits_of_rail/index.cfm gives annual passenger-miles and tonnes of CO2. 2. Sources: TEDB = Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 22, 2002. Table 2.11 and A16. http://www-cta.ornl.gov/data/ EIA = Energy Information Administration, Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 2000, Appendix B, Table B1 3.Sources: TEDB = Transportation Energy Data Book, Edition 22- 2002, Table 2.11 and Table A.15. Available at http://www-cta.ornl.gov/data. EIA = ftp://ftp.eia.doe.gov/pub/oiaf/1605/cdrom/pdf/e-supdoc.pdf, page 5.

Note: transit rail is defined as light and heavy rail. For definitions, please see http://www.apta.com/info/define/mode.htm 4. Source: TEDB = Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 22, 2002. Table 2.11 and A14 http://www-cta.ornl.gov/data/ EIA = Energy Information Administration, Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 2000, Appendix B, Table B1 Note: commuter rail is defined at http://www.apta.com/info/define/mode.htm. A list of agencies that are considered commuter rail can be found at http://www.apta.com/stats/modesumm/cragency.htm

5. Source: Canada’s Climate Change Voluntary Challenge and Registry Inc. (VCR Inc.), 2002. An Action Plan for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions. P 12. www.vcr-mvr.ca. Please note units are in CO2-eq.

(54)

Conversion Factors and General References

Energy and Weight Volume Conversions Distance Factors and Conversions

Table 3

Linear Measure: English Unit Metric Units

1 inch = 1000 mil = 2.54 centimeters (cm) 1 foot (ft) = 12 inches = 30.48 cm or 0.3 meters (M) 1 yard = 36 inches = 91.44 cm or 0.91 meters (M) 1 mile = 5280 ft = 1.61 kilometers (km) or 0.87 nautical miles (nm) 1 nautical mile= 1.149 miles = 1.85 kilometers (km) To convert liters per 100 km to miles per gallon, invert (liters per 100 km/3.785/100*1.6093) [gallons per liter * km per mile] To convert miles per gallon to liters per 100 km, divide 100 by (mpg/3.785*1.6093)

Converting Energy Units (worksheet)

Table 4

Convert fuel use from To

Megajoule BtusTonne oil KilowattGigajoule (MJ) equivalent (toe)hours (kWh) (GJ)

41.86 Fuel type Sample 0.00 240.00 0.00 0.000.000253 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.000000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.000000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.000000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.000000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.000000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.000000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.000000

Sources: International Energy Annual, 1998 http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/iea/convheat.html BP Group Reporting Guidelines, 2000

Converting Mass Units (worksheet)

Table 5

Convert fuel use from To Short tons Long tonsPounds (lb)Metric tons

0.91 1.024.5359 x 10 -4 Fuel type 0.00 0.00 0.000.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000.000000 0.00 0.00 0.000.000000

Sources: International Energy Annual, 1998 http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/iea/convheat.html BP Group Reporting Guidelines, 2000

Emissions Factors for Electricity Summary of English to Metric conversions Transportation Fuels Emissions Factors

Table 9

Emission factors in blue shaded columns are from IPCC, 1999, Volume 2, Section 1, if not otherwise noted. Heating values in blue shaded columns are from API, 2001, if not otherwise noted. Values in other columns is derived arithmatically except as commente d.

Fuel type Lower heat value (derived)(derived)(derived)(derived)(derived)Typical density IEA kg CO2/tonne GJ / liter (API, 2001)GJ/ US gallon GJ/Imp GalGJ/tonnekgCO2/liter kgCO2/US gal lb / gal (API, 2001)Density* (UK DETR)

Gasoline / petrol 69.25 0.0344 0.1302 0.156443.56742.3822 9.01666.59 0.739 t/m3 3135 Kerosene 71.45 0.0357 0.1351 0.162344.07682.5508 9.65466.76 3150 Jet Fuel 70.72 (EIA) 44.5900 10.009 0.780 t/m3 Aviation gasoline69.11 (EIA) 0.0343 0.1299 0.1561 2.3774 8.9984

Diesel 74.01 0.0371 0.1404 0.168744.16672.7458 10.3927 7.49 0.840 t/m3 3142 Distillate fuel oil No.174.01 0.0371 0.1404 0.168743.92112.7458 10.3927 7.05 3142 Distillate fuel oil No.274.01 0.0371 0.1404 0.168743.92112.7458 10.3927 7.05 3142 Residual Fuel oil#474.01 0.0379 0.1435 0.1723 2.8050 10.6168 3142 Residual Fuel oil#577.30 0.0397 0.1503 0.180539.95353.0688 11.6154 8.29 0.930 t/m3 3117 Residual Fuel oil#677.30 0.0405 0.1533 0.184140.75863.1307 11.8495 8.29 0.930 t/m3 3117

LPG 63.20 0.0249 0.0942 0.113245.97791.5737 5.95644.52 Lubricants 73.28 0.0382

Anthracite 98.30 0.02860 GJ / kg 28.6000 1747.30 Bituminous coal 94.53 0.03023 GJ/kg 30.2300 2236.80 Butane 0.0258 4.84 (liquid) 1685.50 Propane 62.99 (EIA) 0.0240 47.3373 4.24 (liquid) 0.507 t/m3

96.00

Wood, wood waste100.44 (EIA) 1730.00 Natural gas 56.06 0.673 t/m3 Source: IPCC IEA (UK DETR)

(unless noted) Density:: International Energy Annual, 1998 http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/iea/convheat.html Technical Data on Fuel, 1977, J.W. Rose; J.R. Cooper

Coal, GJ per tonne by country Converting from Miles per Gallon to grams CO2 per km, also Liters per 100 km

Table 11

9.02 kg CO2/gallon gas See transport fuels emissions factors above 2.38 kg CO2/ liter gas

10.39 kg CO2/gallon diesel for CO2/gallon sources 2.75 kg CO2/ liter diesel

A B C D E F G

Miles per Kg CO2 G CO2Km per Gas DieselLiters per gallon per mile per mile mileg CO2/kmg CO2/km100 km

9.016627/A x 1000 col E x 10.392743235/9.016627 = C / D To convert miles per gallon to liters per 100 km, divide 100 by (mpg/3.785*1.6093) 42.2542 2254.2 1.61 1401 1,614.5 58.8 Shaded table to left is used as 51.8033 1803.3 1.61 1121 1,291.6 47.0 basis of values in worksheet 61.5028 1502.8 1.61 934 1,076.3 39.2 for distance traveled by vehicles. 71.2881 1288.1 1.61 800 922.6 33.6 81.1271 1127.1 1.61 700 807.2 29.4 91.0018 1001.8 1.61 623 717.5 26.1 100.9017 901.7 1.61 560 645.8 23.5 110.8197 819.7 1.61 509 587.1 21.4 120.7514 751.4 1.61 467 538.2 19.6 130.6936 693.6 1.61 431 496.8 18.1 140.6440 644.0 1.61 400 461.3 16.8 150.6011 601.1 1.61 374 430.5 15.7 160.5635 563.5 1.61 350 403.6 14.7 170.5304 530.4 1.61 330 379.9 13.8 180.5009 500.9 1.61 311 358.8 13.1 190.4746 474.6 1.61 295 339.9 12.4 200.4508 450.8 1.61 280 322.9 11.8 210.4294 429.4 1.61 267 307.5 11.2 220.4098 409.8 1.61 255 293.5 10.7 230.3920 392.0 1.61 244 280.8 10.2 240.3757 375.7 1.61 233 269.1 9.8 250.3607 360.7 1.61 224 258.3 9.4 260.3468 346.8 1.61 215 248.4 9.0 270.3339 333.9 1.61 208 239.2 8.7 280.3220 322.0 1.61 200 230.6 8.4 290.3109 310.9 1.61 193 222.7 8.1 300.3006 300.6 1.61 187 215.3 7.8 310.2909 290.9 1.61 181 208.3 7.6 320.2818 281.8 1.61 175 201.8 7.3 330.2732 273.2 1.61 170 195.7 7.1 340.2652 265.2 1.61 165 189.9 6.9 350.2576 257.6 1.61 160 184.5 6.7 360.2505 250.5 1.61 156 179.4 6.5 370.2437 243.7 1.61 151 174.5 6.4 380.2373 237.3 1.61 147 169.9 6.2 390.2312 231.2 1.61 144 165.6 6.0 400.2254 225.4 1.61 140 161.4 5.9 410.2199 219.9 1.61 137 157.5 5.7 420.2147 214.7 1.61 133 153.8 5.6 430.2097 209.7 1.61 130 150.2 5.5 440.2049 204.9 1.61 127 146.8 5.3 450.2004 200.4 1.61 125 143.5 5.2 460.1960 196.0 1.61 122 140.4 5.1 470.1918 191.8 1.61 119 137.4 5.0 480.1878 187.8 1.61 117 134.5 4.9 490.1840 184.0 1.61 114 131.8 4.8 500.1803 180.3 1.61 112 129.2 4.7 510.1768 176.8 1.61 110 126.6 4.6 520.1734 173.4 1.61 108 124.2 4.5 530.1701 170.1 1.61 106 121.8 4.4 540.1670 167.0 1.61 104 119.6 4.4 550.1639 163.9 1.61 102 117.4 4.3 560.1610 161.0 1.61 100 115.3 4.2 570.1582 158.2 1.61 98 113.3 4.1 580.1555 155.5 1.61 97 111.3 4.1 590.1528 152.8 1.61 95 109.5 4.0 600.1503 150.3 1.61 93 107.6 3.9 610.1478 147.8 1.61 92 105.9 3.9 620.1454 145.4 1.61 90 104.2 3.8 630.1431 143.1 1.61 89 102.5 3.7 640.1409 140.9 1.61 88 100.9 3.7 650.1387 138.7 1.61 86 99.4 3.6 660.1366 136.6 1.61 85 97.8 3.6 670.1346 134.6 1.61 84 96.4 3.5

Miles per Gallon, US cars and small trucks, by year

Table 12 to 15 are from National Transportation Statistics, 2000, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, USA

Table 12 http://www.bts.gov/btsprod/nts/Ch4_web/4-23.htm See also:...v/ntda/nts/NTS99/data/Chapter4/4-23.html

Average Fuel Efficiency of U.S. Passenger Cars and Light Trucks http://www.bts.gov/ntda/nts/NTS99/ch4index.html

Average U.S. passenger car fuel efficiency, Miles per gallon Transp Energy Data book: http://www-cta.ornl.gov/data/tedb20/Index.html (mpg) (calendar year) 1980 1985 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999

Passenger car 15.9 17.4 20.2 21.1 21 20.5 20.7 21.1 21.2 21.5 21.4 Other 2-axle 4-tire vehicle 12.2 14.3 16.1 17 17.3 17.4 17.3 17.3 17.2 17.2 17.1 Light-duty vehicle (passenger cars plus light trucks)

21.4 24 23.9 24.4 23.9 24.3 23.7 23.8 24.1 23.7 28.6 30.3 28.5 28.4 27.9 28.1 27.7 27.9 27.7 27.5 27.6 26.9 22.6 26.3 26.9 27.3 27 27.8 27.5 27.7 28.3 28.1 28.2 29.6 31.5 29.9 30.1 29.2 29.6 29.6 30.3 29.7 30 28.4 16.8 19.6 20.3 20.9 20.5 20.7 20.5 20.3 20.5 20.5 20.4 24.3 26.5 23 23 22.7 22.8 22.1 21.5 22.1 22.9 22.5 Passenger car 20 27.5 27.5 27.5 27.5 27.5 27.5 27.5 27.5 27.5 27.5 27.5 Light truck 19.5 20 20.2 20.2 20.4 20.5 20.6 20.7 20.7 20.7 20.7 SOURCES:

Average U.S. passenger car fuel efficiency:

1980-94: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics Summary to 1995, FHWA-PL-97-009 (Washington, DC: July 1997), table VM-201A. 1995-98: Ibid., Highway Statistics (Washington, DC: Annual issues), table VM-1.

New vehicle fuel efficiency (based on model year production):

1980-90: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, final fuel economy calculations for the U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, as cited in Internet site www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/problems/fuelecon/index.html.

1991-99: Manufacturer's preliminary estimates for the U.S. Department of Transportation, as cited in National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Automotive Fuel Economy Program, Twenty-Fourth Annual Report to Congress, Calendar Year 1999, Internet site www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/problems/fuelecon/index.html. CAFE standards:

1980-99: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Automotive Fuel Economy Program, Twenty-Fourth Annual Report to Congress, Calendar Year 1999, Internet site www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/problems/fuelecon/index.html.

Below, Transportation Energy DATA book edition 20 - 2000, Table 8.1, miles per gallon for trucks

1980 1985 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998

Trucks with 6+ tires 5.8 6.1 6.2 6.5 6.5 6.7 6.8 6.8 6.8 7 7 Combination trucks 5.3 5.6 5.8 5.7 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.9 6.1 6.1

Energy Intensity of Passenger Transportation

Table 13 http://www.bts.gov/btsprod/nts/Ch4_web/4-20.htmBureau of Transport Statistics, USDept of Transportation

Energy Intensity of Passenger Modes-Ground (Excerpts]

1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997

Certificated air carrier

Domestic operations 8,633 10,118 10,185 7,746 5,272 5,047 4,932 4,671 4,564 4,558 4,444 4,382 4,183 4,146 4,123 International operat. 9,199 10,292 10,986 8,465 8,866 5,103 4,546 4,609 4,258 4,099 4,145 4,173 4,108 4,168 4,278

Btu per passenger mile

Passenger car 4,495 4,455 4,841 4,743 4,348 4,267 3,812 3,654 3,703 3,785 3,771 3,721 3,702 3,657 3,672 Other2 axle vehicle N N 6,810 6,571 5,709 4,971 4,451 4,277 4,256 4,275 4,345 4,539 4,560 4,563 4,591 Motorcycle a a 2,500 2,345 2,125 1,896 1,990 1,917 1,990 2,063 2,135 2,227 2,250 2,295 2,330 Transit Motor Bus N N N N 2,742 3,396 3,723 3,767 4,038 3,944 4,162 4,155 4,196 4,228 3,729 Amtrak N N N 2,148 2,094 2,064 1,978 2,035 2,023 1,935 1,838 2,148 2,200 2,138 Long distance motor bus 1000 (according to Davis 98, in Chapter 5, DOT Annual report for 1999 a Included in passenger car.

b For 1995 and subsequent years, highway passenger-miles were taken directly from Highway Statistics rather than derived from vehicle-miles and average occupancy, as is the case for 1960-1994. for passenger car, other 2-axle 4-tire vehicle, and motorcycle, and 138,700 Btu/gallon for transit motor bus and Amtrak.

SOURCES:

Air: Certificated air carriers: Passenger-miles:

1960-99: Air Transport Association, Internet site http://www.air-transport.org/public/industry, as of July 5, 2000. Fuel consumed:

1960-99: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Office of Airline Information, Internet site http://www.bts.gov/oai/fuel/fuelyearly.html, as of July 5, 2000. Highway

Passenger car:

1960-94: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics Summary to 1995, FHWA-PL-97-009 (Washington, DC: July 1997), table VM-201A. 1995-98: Ibid. Highway Statistics (Washington, DC: Annual issues), table VM-1.

Other 2-axle 4-tire vehicle:

1970-94: Ibid., Highway Statistics Summary to 1995, FHWA-PL-97-009 (Washington, DC: July 1997), table VM-201A. 1995-98: Ibid., Highway Statistics (Washington, DC: Annual issues), table VM-1. Motorcycle:

1970-85: Ibid., Highway Statistics Summary to 1985, FHWA-PL-97-009 (Washington, DC: July 1997), table VM-201A. 1990-98: Ibid., Highway Statistics (Washington, DC: Annual issues), table VM-1. Transit motor bus:

1980-98: American Public Transportation Association, Public Transportation Fact Book (Washington, DC: March 2000), tables 30, 42; and 65. Amtrak:

1975-98: Amtrak, State and Local Affairs Department, personal communications.

Table 14 http://www.bts.gov/btsprod/nts/Ch4_web/4-21.htmBureau of Transport Statistics, USDept of Transportation

1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1999 Aircraft-miles (millions)

Domestic operations 858 1,134 2,068 1,948 2,523 3,0463,854 3,854 3,995 4,1574,380 4,629 4,811 4,9115,0315,176 International operations 182 284 475 377 401 415 807 807 904 961 980 9981,043 1,1141,1911,197

Available seat-miles (millions) Domestic operations52,220 94,787213,160 241,282 346,028 445,826543,638 551,562 557,989 571,489585,438603,917626,389640,319649,442686,940

International operations13,347 29,53351,960 61,724 86,507110,963171,561 186,468 194,784 200,151198,893203,160208,682216,913224,728230,909

Passenger-miles (millions)

Domestic operations30,557 51,887104,147 131,728 200,289 270,584332,566 338,085 347,931 354,177378,990394,708425,596442,640455,799479,689 International operations8,306 16,78927,563 31,082 54,363 65,819115,389 125,211 130,622 135,508140,391145,948153,067160,779163,656171,908

Fuel consumed (million gallons)

Domestic operations 1,954 3,889 7,857 7,558 9,096 12,812 13,66013,87714,402 International operations 566 1,280 2,243 1,949 1,938 3,945 4,9645,1865,250

Seats per aircraft

Domestic operations 60.9 83.6 103.1 123.9 137.1 146.4141.1 143.1 139.7 137.4133.7 130.5 130.2 131.1129.1132.7 International operations73.3 104.0 109.4 163.7 215.7 245.7212.6 231.1 215.5 208.7 203203.6 200.1 194.7188.7192.9

Seat-miles per gallon

Domestic operations 27 24 27 32 38 44 47 47 47 48 47 47 48 47 4748 International operations 24 23 23 32 45 41 47 47 47 49 46 45 45 44 4344 Domestic operations 8,633 10,11810,185 7,746 6,131 5,0474,671 4,647 4,564 4,5584,444 4,382 4,183 4,1464,1234053 International operations9,199 10,29210,986 8,465 4,813 5,1034,610 4,253 4,258 4,0994,161 4,173 4,108 4,1684,2784,123 Load factor (%) Domestic operations 54.6 61.3 69.1 70.269.8 International operations 54.4 67.1 74.1 74.4 passenger, and all-cargo. Fuel consumed includes majors, nationals, and large regionals, scheduled and charter, passenger, and all-cargo.

Passenger-miles includes all four air-carrier groups, scheduled and charter, passenger service only. International operations include operations outside the United States, including those between the United States and foreign countries and the United States and its territories or possessions. Heat equivalent factor used for Btu conversion is 135,000 Btu/gallon.

SOURCES:

Aircraft-miles, available seat-miles, passenger-miles, and load factor: 1960-80: Air Transport Association, Internet site http://www.air-transport.org/public/industry, as of July 5, 2000. 1985-98: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Office of Airline Information, Air Carrier Traffic Statistics (Washington DC: Annual December issues). 1960-99: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Office of Airline Information, Internet site http://www.bts.gov/oai/fuel/fuelyearly.html, as of July 5, 2000. Seats per aircraft, seat-miles per gallon, and energy intensiveness: Derived by calculation.

Comparative Analysis of per passenger mile data provided in US DOT Tables g CO@ / P-km g CO@ / P-km Btu/ Psgr_Mile Joule/ P_MileGJ per P_Milekg CO2/GJg CO2 /P_Mile g CO@ / P-kmlb CO2/P_mile DETR Union Concerned Scientists

Aircraft carriers 1998 x 1055 IPCC, by fuel = I x H = J/1.6093 =j/453.6g CO@ / P-km pg 57,265, Consumer's Guide to Effective Environmental Choices Domestic 4,034 4255870 0 71.5 304.3 189.10.6709 180long 37.7 These UCS # of riders International 4,070 4293850 0 71.5 307 190.80.6768 110short impacts include Bus Analysis12

Ground 1997 upstream 6.7 gallons per mileDOPT 98 Passenger car 3,657.00 3858135 0 69.3 267.4 166.20.5895 66.6 lifecycle emissions 1280.6g CO2 per mile Other2 axle vehicle4,427.00 4670485 0 73.3 342.5 212.80.7551 66.6 106.72per mile per rider Motorcycle 2,104.00 2219720 0 69.3 153.8 95.6 0.3391 66.6 UCS 66.31 per km per rider

For most activities, the reporting worksheets include all the detail needed including default emission factors. The tables given below are provided as a general resource for those users who may wish to develop custom factors, or trace the derivation of factors given.

1 x 10 -3 1.05506 x 10 -6 3.6 x 10 -3

kg CO2 / GJ (IPCC, 1999)

Sub-bituminous coal 0.039 GJ / standard cubic meter API, 2001(for heating values)

R21.6 R17.2

New vehicle fuel efficiency (mpg)a (model year)

Domestic R23.3 R23.3 Imported Passenger car Domestic R27.8 Imported R30.1 Light truck (<8,500 lbs GVWR) Domestic R20.1 Imported R22.2

CAFE standards (mpg)a (model year)

16.0/14.0b a Assumes 55% city and 45% highway-miles. The source calculated average miles per gallon for light-duty vehicles by taking the reciprocal of the sales-weighted average of gallons per mile. This is called the harmonic average. b 2 Wheel Drive/4 Wheel Drive. No combined figure available for this year.

KEY: CAFE = Corporate Average Fuel Economy; GVWR = gross vehicle weight rating; mpg = miles per gallon; R = revised; U = data are unavailable NOTE: The fuel efficiency figures for light duty vehicles represent the sales-weighted harmonic average of the combined passenger car and light truck fuel economies.

1998P AirR

HighwayB KEY: Btu = British thermal unit; N = data do not exist; P = preliminary; R = revised. NOTES: To calculate total Btu, multiply fuel consumed (see tables 4-21, 4-22, 4-24, 4-25) by 135,000 Btu/gallon for air carrier, 125,000 Btu/gallon

Energy Intensity of Certificated Air Carriers, All Servicesa

1998P

R10115 R11506 R11,637R11,763 R11959R12476 R13187 R2488 R3940 R4,120 R4113R4311 R4511 R4658

Energy intensiveness (Btu/passenger-mile)b

R58.5 R54.7 R48.9 R58 R60.7 R61.2 R62.4 R62 R64.7 R65.4 R67.9 R62.2 R56.8 R53 R62.8 R64.6 R67.3 R67.1 R67.6 R70.6 R71.8 R73.3 R72.8 a U.S. owned carriers only. Operation of foreign-owned carriers in or out of the United States not included.

b Calculation based on unrounded figures not shown here.

KEY: Btu = British thermal unit; P = preliminary; R = revised NOTES: Aircraft-miles includes all four air-carrier groups (majors, nationals, large regionals, and medium regionals), scheduled and charter,

(55)

Transit Motor Bus 3,835.00 4045925 0 74.1 299.7 186.20.6607 may havemisplaced a decimal place in footnoot on 265 Amtrak, train 2,200.00 2321000 0 74.1 171.9 106.80.3790 60 train 26.6 Long Distance Bus 1,000 1055000 0 74.1 78.1 48.5 0.1722 22.2

Energy Intensity of Rail Freight, Truck Freight

Table 15 http://www.bts.gov/btsprod/nts/Ch4_web/4-25.htmBureau of Transport Statistics, USDept of Transportation

1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 199619971998

Revenue freight ton-miles (millions) 572,309 697,878 764,809 754,252918,958 876,9841,033,9691,038,8751,066,7811,109,3091,200,7011,305,6881,355,975###### Car-miles (millions) 28,170 29,336 29,890 27,65629,277 24,920 26,159 25,62826,12826,88328,48530,38331,71531,66032,657 Tons per car load 44 49 55 61 67 68 67 66 66 64 63 65 676364 Fuel consumed (million gallons) 3,463 3,592 3,545 3,6573,904 3,110 3,115 2,9063,005 3,088 3,334 3,4803,5793,5753583 Energy intensiveness (Btu/revenue freight ton-mile) 839 714 643 672 589 492 418 388 391 386 385 370 366368361 Energy intensiveness (Btu/car-mile) 17,051 16,983 16,450 18,34118,495 17,310 16,516 15,72715,95215,93216,23415,88615,65215,66215218

Converting to other units 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 19961997

Joules per ton mile (@1055/btu) 885423.08753157.39678253.7709475.51621645.89 518916.69440838.44409318.37412190.64407336.83406316.8390003.72386223.71### Joules per ton mile (@1055/btu) Gigajoules per ton mile (@ 10^9 per) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gigajoules per ton mile (@ 10^9 per)

Kg CO2 per ton mile (74.067/gj) 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.030.03 kg CO2 per ton mile (74.067/gj) Kg CO2 per tonne-km 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.020.02 kg CO2 per tonne-km

Gallons per ton-mile 0.01 0.01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 gallons per ton-mile

Ton-miles per gallon 165.3 194.3 215.7 206.2235.4 282.0 331.9 357.5355.0 359.2 360.1 375.2378.9377.3 ton-miles per gallon Kj/tonne-km 606.3 515.7 464.4 485.8425.7 355.3 301.9 280.3282.3 278.9 278.2 267.1264.5265.6 Kj/tonne-km

The following values are drawn from "Comprehensive Truck Size and Weight (TS&W) Study" Phase 1-Synthesis, Working Paper 12, Feb, 1995, by Batelle Team for Federal Highway Admin and US Dept of Transportation

Study summarizedFor year Truck Rail Ratio

kJ/tonne-km Rail to TruckTruck to Rail Bronzinei, pg 6 1972 1,693 496 0.29 3.41 Rose, pg 6 1977 2045 636 0.31 3.22 Transport Canada 1976 1631 396 0.24 4.12 Kahn ? 1357 313 0.23 4.34 US DOT/FRA Rail vs Truck Efficiency: The Relative Fuel Efficiency of Truck Competitive Rail Freight and Truck Operations Compared in a range of corridors (1991)

Container truck Rail Ratio ton miles per gallon Range: 90-140300-1000 Compare at: 110 400 3.64 Therefore truck freight is estimated at 3.6 times .02 kg CO2/tonne_km

Energy Intensity of Class I Railroada Freight Service

a Class I railroads are those that have operating revenues of $255 million or more.

KEY: Btu = British thermal unit NOTE: The heat equivalent factor used for Btu conversion is 138,700 Btu/gallon. SOURCE: Association of American Railroads, Railroad Facts (Washington, DC: November 2000), pp. 34, 37, and 40.

These comparative studies suggest rail is 3 to 4 times more efficient that trucks per ton-mile or tonne-km.1 1. This factor is very general and should only be used if more specific data is not available. Data on specifc a fleet, equipment type, company, transportation

contractor, region, national, etc will often be more accurate (fleet-specific is generally most accurate, while national factors are generally least accurate). Steps should be taken to determine appropriate, accurate factors for your specific situation.

In comparison with other data sources, this factor may be near the smaller end of the spectrum of estimates of freight weight-distance factors. US Dept. of Energy data suggests that US economy truck freight wide kg CO2/tonne-km is 2 to 3.5 times larger than .72 kg CO2/tonne-km. (Transportation Energy Data Book, 23rd Ed., US DOE, Tables 2.14, 2.15, A.6. http://www-cta.ornl.gov/data/Index.html). However, this tool continue to cite this factor as a general estimate based on peer-reviewed studies.

(56)

###

Frequently Asked Questions for Mobile Sources Module

###

Excel mechanics

###

###

When I save the file, I get a message from Excel saying it is in an earlier version. What do I do?

###

###

This workbook was deliberately designed as an Excel 95 file, so that users with Excel 95 could use it. You may save it

###

###

in any version of Excel (5/95 or higher), but if saved as a Excel 97 document, someone using Excel 95 will not be able to open it.

###

###

You may click either the yes or the no buttons on the dialog box that Excel presents when you save the file.

###

###

I get a message from Excel saying a cell is protected. What do I do?

###

###

Worksheets have been protected to restrict data entry to cells shaded yellow and light blue. If you must unprotect a worksheet,

###

###

###

###

When the file was distributed, there was no password. Generally, keep worksheets protected to prevent errors.

###

To make a cell editable when the sheet is protected, first unprotect the sheet. Then select the cell, and using the Format Cell command

###

activate the protection tab on the command dialog box and make sure the Locked option is not checked. (It toggles). Finally,

###

re-protect the worksheet using the Tools Protection Command.

###

###

How can I insert rows (without messing up the twisties and the rows they collapse and hide)?

###

Select a data entry row you would like to copy, then click on the "Add a Line" button located near the top of each worksheet page.

###

How can I delete a row?

###

We are not expecting users to delete rows. However, if you wish to delete a row, select the entire row and delete it using the Edit menu delete command.

###

Deleting a row will create errors, because it confuses the numbering scheme in hidden column A that is used to display and collapse the appropriate

###

number of rows in each section. To rememdy these errors, after deleting a row, USE THE TOOLS/ MACRO COMMAND

###

and run the FIX ROWS macro before re-protecting the worksheet. This updates the row numbering scheme in hidden

###

column A, which is used so the "Twisties" can open and close the correct number of rows in the section below them.

###

The workbook pauses to calculate each time I add a number. Can I speed this up?

###

###

turns off Excel's default setting which is to recalculate the entire sheet with every change. Enter as much data as you like, then

###

press on the F9 button to calculate the entire worksheet at once.

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

go to the Tools menu and select the Protection subcommand. Select the option to unprotect sheet, which toggles.

(57)

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

(58)

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

(59)

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

###

References

Related documents

The high level of farmers’ perceived risk factor for chilli cultivation is largely from probability of loss associated with Anthracnose attack (it attacks would lead to

Development of Cancer Vaccines Identification of Tumor Associated Antigents Adjuvant Development Checkpoints &amp; Immuno- suppression Basic Science Preclinical Studies

Due to the aforementioned closure of the radio stations on 10 June 2004, petitioners filed with the RTC a Motion for the Issuance of a Writ of Preliminary Mandatory Injunction

We find that India, like other emerging markets, has also been confronted with the various alternatives under ”impossible trinity” and has chosen to adopt an intermediate

Oh Dios, cuya Misericordia es infinita y cuyos tesoros de compasión no tienen límites, míranos con Tu favor y aumenta Tu Misericordia dentro de nosotros, para que en

Yet their goals remained the same, Lilac to find his Door back to reality, Dahlia to get his crown and Edelweiss and Bergamont for having a good time.. Yet, would they find

Banque Fédérale des Banques Populaires (BFBP), the central body of the Banque Populaire Group.. „ The financial statements were approuved by the Board of Directors of the

There is regional equivalence of the MBBS, or basic medical degree; the postgraduate medical degree (MD or MS); and other postgraduate degrees (MPH, MPhil and PhD). One of the