• No results found

00frontmatter.pdf

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "00frontmatter.pdf"

Copied!
5
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

parolina

planning

(2)

Digitized

by

the

Internet

Archive

in

2011

with

funding

from

University

of

North Carolina

at

Chapel

Hill

(3)

Carolina

planning

A

Student

Publication

of

the University

of

North

Carolina

Department

of City

and

Regional Planning

(4)

contents

Water and

Sewer

Extension Policies as a

Technique

for

Guiding

Development

by Michael

Nugent

A

Comparison

of

Land

Use

Legislation in Western North

Carolina

and Vermont

by

Benjamin

Orsbon

12

Is North Carolina

Ready

for

Community—

Based

Correc-tions? by Marilyn Sandorf 19

Using

Land

Treatmentfor Municipal

Wastewater

Disposal

by Winston Harrington 26

CoastalArea

Management

Act:Regional Planningforthe

State's Coastal Area by Arthur

Cooper

and Stuart

George

33 Earnings in North Carolina:

An

Analysisofthe Industrial

Mix

and

Local Effects by Robert

Crow

and PeterStroup 38

The

North Carolina

Humble

Case and

its Impact

on

Planned Unit

Developments

by Frederick Carr 44 Carolina Planning

welcomes

comments

and suggestions on the articles

published

and

will be

happy

toaccept

new

material forfuture editions from

interested persons.

Such

material should be submitted to the Editor type

written, double spaced,

and

not to

exceed

fifteen pages length. Additional

copiesofthe journal are availableon requestfromthe

Department

ofCity

and

Regional Planning fora $1.00 prepaid handling charge.

Staff

Editor

Nancy Grden

Graphic Designer

John

Carroll

Editorial Assistant Jim Miller

Editorial

Board

Faculty

members

Gorman

Gilbert

David

Godschalk

Student

members

Jim Foerster

Wanda

Lewis

(5)

Carolina Planning, the student publication of the

Department

of City

and

Regional Planning

(DCRP)

atthe University of NorthCarolinaat Chapel Hill,

will discussplanning problems

and

issuesintheStateofNorthCarolina. Itwill

emphasize

public policy rather thanmethodologies

and

theoriesofplanning. Objectivesofthe publications are:

(1)

To

provideaforumforthediscussionofplanning problems,issues,

and

techniques related to the practice of planning in North Carolina;

(2)

To

enhance

the

awareness

publicofficialshaveabout planningin North

Carolina

and

elsewhere; and

(3)

To

provide for the

improvement

exchange

of planning information

between

the

DCRP

and other governmental

and academic

institutions inthe

state

and

nation.

Students from the

DCRP

will be the primary contributors to Carolina Planning; however, contributions from other sources such as the

DCRP

faculty, professional planners, publicofficials,

and

students

and

facultyfrom

other

academic

institutions in theState are encouraged.

This first issue of Carolina Planning culminates an intensive year of

work

done

bya

number

of people.

The

ideaforthe publication

was

developed last

summer

byseveral

DCRP

graduatestudents,

who

identifiedtheneedforsucha publication

and

feltthe students in

DCRP

could fulfill it. Instrumental in this

development

were JimMiller,

John

Carroll,and Lee

Corum,and

I

would

liketo

thank

them

for theircontinuous supportandassistancethroughout thispast

year. I also want to

acknowledge

George

Hemmens,

chairmanofthe

DCRP,

and the Editorial Board, faculty

members

Gorman

Gilbert and David

Godschalk and

student

members

JimFoerster,

Wanda

Lewis,

and

Chuck

Roe,

for their valuable contributionsto the publication.

My

deepest appreciation

goes

to the Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation of

Winston-Salem, North Carolina,fortheir

generous

grantthatallows Carolina

Planningto bepublishedsemi-annuallyforthenexttwoyears.I

would

alsolike

to thank the

John

Parker Trust

Fund

and the

DCRP

for their financial

contributionsto thisfirst issue.

Nancy

L.

Grden

Editor, Carolina Planning

UZclZ

V.

\-

(f

foreword

Since the

Department

of City and Regional Planning

was

established in

Chapel Hill in 1946

we

have hadamajorconcern forthe

development

ofhigh

quality public planning in North Carolina along with the education of

professional plannersand

advancement

oftheartand scienceofplanning. In

these years

we

have had the opportunity toteach

many

of theprofessional planners

now

serving the people oftheState,

and

have

watched and worked

with the rapidly growing planning activities in our city, county

and

state

governments. Withthewidespread concernover the futureofourenvironment,

thecurrentproblemsofthe

economy

and

planningforgrowthand change,

and

the widespread concern for efficient

and

fair

government

action,the issuesof

public planning need tobewidely discussed,

and

theexperiencesof different

local governments, citizen groups,

and

the university

community

needto be

shared.

We

arevery pleasedtobeableto offerthis

new

magazine

as aforumfor

discussion of planning in

and

for North Carolina. This

magazine

was

made

possible thru theefforts ofstudents

and

alumniofthe

Department

ofCity

and

Regional Planning and the generosity of the Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation.

The

students initiated the

magazine

out of theirconcern that a closer tie be

created

between

citizens, professional planners

and

the University,andthey provided the time and effort to

make

this happen.

The

alumni of this

Department from throughout theUnited States

made

possible theproduction

jof this first issue thru their contributions.

A

generous grant from the

IFoundation assuresthefirst twoyears ofpublication. At the

end

of this two

years

we

hope

tobeoperatingona self-sustainingbasis,

and

we

hope

thatthis

j

magazine

will

become

a

permanent

featureof public life in North Carolina.

George

C.

Hemmens

Chairman

Departmentof City

and

Regional Planning

Universityof North Carolina

J?

introduction

Carolina Planning is published

semi-annually by the studentsofthe

Depart-ment

of City

and

Regional Planning of

the UniversityofNorth Carolina,Chapel

Hill, North Carolina 27514. Copyright © bythe Departmentof Cityand Regional Planning 1975.

Cover Photo:Zebulon. North Carolina,from

theair. Graphicdesign by JohnCarroll. Typesettingand Printing by:

Figure

Graphic Designer John Carroll

References

Related documents

Table-6 Significance of difference between two mean scores of non-addict young and middle adulthood group on the measure of anxiety.. ** significance at 0.05 level

Figure 5 presenting the correlation between Gray value (radiation absorption coefficient) versus the tissue thickness or distance in pixel (mm) as a matrix cross

There was no previous study included knowledge, attitude and barriers in gulf countries and as far as we know there was no study in Saudi Arabia investigated

very much like intransitives with indirect objects: the basic agreement-type forms have two verbal prefixes referring to intransitive subject and indirect object, whereby the

From these results, it can be concluded that transformants obtained with the wild-type and the mutant 3 ⬘ virD2 and virE2 Agrobacterium strains showed predominantly single and ran-

Two-way indicator species analysis classified the 25 plots into six vegetation types corresponding to lowland evergreen rainforest, lowland evergreen rainforest on basalt

With this background, a study was conducted among patients presenting with soft tissue infection to KIMS hospital, Bangalore in which, this scoring system was

The proposed method of forecasting was used to solve the problem of estimating aeroionic mode in industrial zones in the open area of the industrial site of the Dnipro oil