Streamlining the eDiscovery
Response Process
Response Process
Dean Gonsowski, Esq. – Sr. eDiscovery Counsel
Today’s Speaker
y
p
Dean Gonsowski Esq – Sr eDiscovery Counsel
Mr. Gonsowski is the Sr. eDiscovery Counsel at Symantec. He is a member of
The Sedona Conference Working Group on Electronic Document Retention
(
)
(
)
Dean Gonsowski, Esq. – Sr. eDiscovery Counsel
and Production (WG1), the Electronic Discovery Reference Model (EDRM)
and teaches a series of continuing legal education (CLE) courses on various
e‐discovery topics.
H h
t ib t d
ti l
t
b
f l di
i d t
bli ti
He has contributed articles to a number of leading industry publications
including: Business Week, Corporate Counsel, ILTA Peer to Peer, Inside
Counsel and the Legal Tech Newsletter.
Agenda
g
The Information Governance Imperative
1
Incremental Improvement
2
A Federal Case Study
3
Clearwell & Symantec – Better Together
4
Top Challenges: Information Governance
The Electronic Discovery Reference Model (EDRM)
p
g
f Preservation Processing Information Management Identification Collection Review Analysis Production S C iti l I f ti Automate Records Retention Policies Reduce Storage Costs Secure Critical InformationE‐Discovery Timeline
E‐Discovery Timeline
Proactive E‐DiscoveryInformation Governance, simply put:
Retain, secure and analyze data to
deliver a common view across
business, legal and IT and enable
organizations to balance information
g
control and freedom.
5Information Governance Survey Results
y
How much do you associate each of the following activities with the concept
of information governance?
–
Email/Records retention (82%)
–
Email/Records retention (82%)
–
Data storage (82%)
–
Data security & privacy (80%)
–
Compliance (78%)
–
eDiscovery (74%)
How associated with information governance are each of the following
departments within your organization?
departments within your organization?
–
Legal (75%)
–
Compliance (75%)
–
Records Management (71%)
IT (68%)
–
IT (68%)
–
Other (55%)
Agenda
g
The Information Governance Imperative
1
Incremental Improvement
2
A Federal Case Study
3
Clearwell & Symantec – Better Together
4
A Drastic Improvement Over The Current Process
p
Current Process
Information Intelligence
Information Intelligence
Symantec
7 t 12
k
2 d
7 to 12 weeks
8 to 10 different logins and systems
2 days
2 logins and systems
O
li k li k b
No link between
eDiscovery and Data Security
Manual tracking
One‐click link between
eDiscovery and Data Security
Automated tracking
g
Ad‐hoc communication
across organizations
g
Single common platform
across organizations
eDiscovery Maturity Model
y
y
Any InfoGov Solution Must Meet Fundamental
Requirements
q
• Who owns the data?
Wh
i h d
?
Data Intelligence
• Where is the data?
Data Intelligence
• On‐premise and Cloud
Data Products should
• On‐premise and Cloud
• Retention and Discovery and Security
Data Products should
work together
• Shorten/automate workflow
• Audit/track automatically
Streamline Processes
• Show success/ROI immediately
• Add capabilities over time
Solve InfoGov
Incrementally
Agenda
g
The Information Governance Imperative
1
Incremental Improvement
2
A Federal Case Study
3
Clearwell & Symantec – Better Together
4
Case Study: US Government Department
Workflow
• Agency Profile:
–
100,000+ employees
–
16,000+ FOIA requests each year
–
Growing backlog of unresolved requests
Process
Request
Collect Data
Search
Review and
Redact
Produce and
Close
Receive request Visibility into data Deduplicate data Perform redaction Multiple Process and assign to FOIA analyst Determine if delinquent on FOIA request volume for cost estimation Collect from Exchange, OpenText archive, Sh P i t Perform targeted keyword searches Single search interface for over 400 file types Perform redaction of personally identifiable information Capture exemption codes Multiple production options including redacted TIFF/PDF Treatment of metadata FOIA request payments SharePoint Filter to only relevant information 400 file types including PST/NSF
email Generate an index that can be used as a Vaughn index
Case Study: US Government Department
Results
Average Search Time
Per FOIA Request
2 hours 41 minutes
Before Clearwell
Average Efficiency Gain with
Clearwell:
1 hour 2 minutes
61 percent
After
Clearwell
61 percent
Case Study: US Government Department
Results
• More than 50% improvement in time to complete a FOIA
response
• Reduced FOIA backlog by 80%
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Streamlining the FOIA Process 15An integrated approach to information governance
g
pp
g
Classify information
for retention,
supervisory review
Common
policies for
attorney‐client
Search backups
and archive,
and apply legal
Identify potential
custodians for
eDiscovery based
Classify files for
use in eDiscovery
collection
Use technology
assisted review
results for
supervisory review,
and discovery
attorney client
privileged
information to
prevent data
loss and for
retention
and apply legal
holds at the
file‐level for
eDiscovery
eDiscovery based
on file usage data
collection
results for
future data
classification
retention
For more information…
VISIT OUR BLOG
VISIT OUR BLOG
www.clearwellsystems.com/e‐discovery‐
blog
www.clearwellsystems.com/e‐discovery‐
blog
eDISCOVERY PRODUCTS AND SOLUTIONS
www.clearwellsystems.com/electronic‐discovery‐Products/index.php
eDISCOVERY PRODUCTS AND SOLUTIONS
www.clearwellsystems.com/electronic‐discovery‐Products/index.php
17Thank you!
Thank you!
Copyright © 2010 Symantec Corporation. All rights reserved. Symantec and the Symantec Logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Symantec Corporation or its affiliates in