• No results found

Multiplier Representations and Generating Functions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Multiplier Representations and Generating Functions"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ISSN 2319-8133 (Online)

(An International Research Journal), www.compmath-journal.org

Multiplier Representations and Generating Functions

S. K. Raizada and Rajeev Kumar Department of Mathematics & Statistics,

Dr. R. M. L. Avadh University, Faizabad, U., P., INDIA.

e-mail: [email protected], e-mail: [email protected] (Received on: February 5, 2015)

ABSTRACT

Group theoretic method has been applied and some Generating functions have been obtained for proper hypergeometric function   , ;  ;

by introducing Lie-operators effecting the one numerator and one denominator parameter in it simultaneously.

Keywords: Hypergeometric function / Lie-operators / Multiplier representation / Group theoretic method of obtaining generating functions.

INTRODUCTION

The Lie-group theoretic method suggested by Weisner1and Miller2has been successfully used by Manocha3 to find certain generating functions involving double hypergeometric series for s.Then Jain and Agarwal4 extended this technique to proper hypergeometric function, ; ; and obtained some new generating functions for it by variation of the numerator parameter  only. In the present note, the authors have introduced Lie-operators affecting the numerator parameter  and denominator parameter simultaneously and thus have deduced some newgenerating relations for proper hypergeometric functions.

FORMULATION OF THE PROBLEM We consider an ordinary differential equation

  , ,     0 , (1)

with a solution ,and thereby show that the corresponding partial differential equation

  ,    ,       ,   0 (2)

(2)

remains invariant by the transformation induced by the multiplier representation

   , of a Lie-group, which is isomorphic to some Lie-group!2, #.

Thus (2) can yield a solution   ,  serving as the generating function for solutions  of (1).

DIFFERENTIAL OPERATORS AND MULTIPLIER REPRESENTATION We know that,

$  %    , ;  ; , (3)

is a solution5 of 1 ' ()( *   '      1 +)'    $  0 (4)

Now we replace the parameterby the operator    and construct the partial differential equation

 ,  % , 1 ' --(( 1 ' --.-(  * '    1 +-- ' -.- '  /  , . (5) Clearly ,   $ is a solution of (5) iff$  is a solution of (4).

Next we introduce first order partial differential operators,

01 y-.-   ' ─1 (6)

03 1 ' -- '  --.'  (7)

04 1 ' 4 ---.-   ' 1 ' 4 (8) It can easily be seen that these operators01, 03&04satisfy the Commutator relations:

01, 05  5 05 , 03, 04  201 (9)

and hence generate a Lie-algebra of the Lie-group2!2, #.

The Casimir operator, 6  0304 0101' 01

 1 '  7 1 '  

  1 '  

   *γ ' α  β  1z+ 

 ' βy ' αβ<  1

4 *1   '  +   ' 

 1 '  >*1   '  +   ' , (10) commutes with each of the0- operators.

In terms of the Casimir operator 6 of (10),eq. (5) can be written as:

(3)

91 6 ,   ,>*1   '  +   ' /  , . (11) Now, to determine the multiplier representation induced bythe0- operators, we need to compute the expression for?@AB, ?CAD& ?)AE.

Using Miller2technique, it is seen that:

?@AB ,   1 @.F41 @.4G @3..3@ , H  ; I@.I  JK1, | |4 (12)

?CAD ,   1  M4N 3.C3.C,3.C. ; |M| O 1 (13)

?)AE ,   ?P()Q3R4G4 , ?). (14) Therefore, it may easily be deduced that:

   ,   ?@AB?CAD?)AE , 

 ?P()Q3 R4 G41 @.F41 @.4G1  H  M4N  @3.3.3@C

.3@3@3.C,3@3.C@3.ST , (15) where the complex parametersμ,M,$are related to V !2, # , such that:

% W XY Z;WZ ' XY  1, (16)

respectively by: μ  ─ Y W⁄ , M  ─WX &?T( W.

Therefore, for in a sufficiently small neighborhood of the identity element

1 00 1 V !2, # ,

   ,   WF4\41 '^.]F4Z ' X4N ^.4]4_.

^.4]4_.,4_.^.4]; (17)

|W` W| O a,|W` Z| O a , I_.I O 1 , I^.]I O JK 1, | |4.

DEDUCTION OF GENERATING FUNCTIONS

First we choose  ,  to be a common eigen function of the operator6and  ' 10101 1 ' 0104

2 b

2   ' ' 2 c' 3 '   ' ' 3e 04 f  ' g  ' c' 1   '  1hi01 (18) i.e.  ,  satisfy either of the following simultaneous equations:

6 ,   ,>*1  α ' β  γ+   ' /  , , (19)  ' 10101 1 ' 0104

2 b

2   ' ' 2 c' 3 '   ' ' 3e 04

(4)

*  '   ' c' 1   '  1+01 ,.  ' ' 2 c' 1 b  '  ' 1   '  1i '>  ' ' 1  '  1/  , , (20) which can be re-written respectively as:

, 1 ' --(( 1 ' - -.-(  *γ ' α  β  1z+-- ' βy-.- ' αβ/  ,   0 (21) ,1 ' -.-(( 1 ' - -.-(  *γ ' α  β  1y+-.- ' βz-- ' αβ/  ,   0 (22) These equations have a solution6:

 ,   F, , c; ; ,  ; (23) where,

F, , c; ; ,   ∑ NlDmF \l \n m l.m

lDm o! q!

ro,qst .

Therefore,

   ,   WF4\41 '^.]F41 '^.]4\Z ' X4N,, , c; ;^.4]4_.

^.4]4_.,4_. ^.4]/(24) Now    ,  satisfies:

6   ,     6  , 

   uv1

4 1   '     ' w x  , 

 b>1  α ' β  γ   ' e    ,  (25) which shows that (5) is invariant with respect to transformation induced by the multiplier representation of !2, #.

Therefore   ,  has an expansion of the form

   ,   ∑rs4rz    , ;  ; . (26) To compute the coefficientsz  , we put  0 on both sides to get,

z   WF4\4XZ4N4 Ґ Q 3 |

ҐQ  r Q 3 ~! Ґ33~} 4F}

~st ^_]~F' ' `, , c; ' `; 1, 'W X (27) Thus the generating relation becomes:

1 '^.]R41 '^.]4G1 '_.4QF,, , c; ;^.4]4_.

^.4]4_.,4_. ^.4]/

(5)

93

  Ґα  n

Ґ α X

Z ‚

r 

s4r

  , ;  ;

 α  ~ 1 ' ~

`! Ґ1    `

r

~st

XY WZ‚

~ƒ

F,' ' `, , c; ' `; 1, 'W X / ; (28) I^.]I O JK 1, | |4) ,I_.I O 1, WZ ' XY  1

where the terms corresponding to   '1, '2 , ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 'are well defined because of the relation;

@‡4qlim α  H~ 1 ' ~

`! Ґ 1  H  `

r

~st

XY WZ‚

~,'H ' `, , c; ' `; 1, 'W X /

 Q4 qq! m 4Fm^_]qQ~! 3q} 4F3q}

}

r~st ^_]~F,' `, , c; ' ` ' ˆ; 1, 'W X / (29)

Equation (28) is the required result.

SPECIAL CASE

As a special case, result (28) reduces to the following generating relation

1 'M

R41 'M

 ‚

4Gu, , c; ;  ' M

 ' M ,  ' Mx

 ∑ ҐQ 3 |Ґg\n 3 |hҐ R

ҐQҐ\n ҐR3| Ґ|3 

rs4r   , ;  ; α  n, c ; 1  n; 'w ; (30)

ŠM

Š O JK 1, | |4

Similarly choosing another common eigen function, we can obtain other generating function.

REFERENCES

1. Weisner L., Group theoretic origin of certain generating functions. Pacific J. Math 5:1033-1039 (1955).

2. Miller W., Lie theory and special functions. Academic press (1966).

3. Manocha H L., Lie theoretic generating function. Pub De I’ Institut. Mathematique (1976).

4. Jain R & Agarwal B M., Multiplier representation and generating functions. Comment Math. Univ. 30 (2):105-111 (1981).

(6)

5. Rainville ED. Special functions. Mc Millan (1960).

6. Srivastava H M & Manocha H L., A treatise on generating functions. Ellis Harwood Series (1984).

References

Related documents

innovation in payment systems, in particular the infrastructure used to operate payment systems, in the interests of service-users 3.. to ensure that payment systems

governments differ in their approaches as to how best to serve their domestic constituencies: (1) How trade in the Internet marketplace should be treated, particularly in the context

Standard heavy weight tool joints are manufactured from AISI 4142 H- 4145 H modified drill collar material.. The heavy weight pipe body is manufactured from AISI

Although the temperature used in the reactive deposition experiments of the bimetallic materials (200ºC) was generally lower than the temperatures employed in the

2012 2011 U.S. The intent of this strategy is to minimize plan expenses by exceeding the interest growth in long-term plan liabilities. Risk tolerance is established

In [3], we obtained generalization error bounds for learning binary classifiers on a finite metric space X using the class of all binary functions on X ; and [6] obtained error

The problem addressed in this paper is the detection of single line outage using only the data provided by the PMU and system topology information. Since, PMU data is more

This study presents the features of new electronic system developed by Davey Bickford and presents two case studies showing how the electronic system can improve the