• No results found

Blended Learning and Digital Divide

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Blended Learning and Digital Divide"

Copied!
17
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

https://en.unesco.org/themes/ict-education; https://aiedforum.org/#/home

Blended Learning and Digital Divide

Fengchun Miao

Chief, Unit for Technology and AI in Education (ED/FLI/ICT), UNESCO

UNESCO/Open Society Foundation Webinar

(2)

Outline

1. How do EDtech and human interface fit in together?

2. How do we define the digital divide in distance learning?

3. What are the best practices on minimizing the digital divide and increasing access to education via EDtech?

4. How has the cost of EdTech been calculated for governments?

https://en.unesco.org/themes/ict-education; https://aiedforum.org/#/home

(3)

Ensuring Effective Distance Learning during COVID-19 Disruption: Guidance for Teachers

https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000375116

1. How do EDtech and human interface fit in together?

(4)

Main categories of blended learning: Analyzing pedagogical methodologies and learning processes

Online distance learning (new MOOCS)

TV

programme based

Radio programme

based

Print material

based

Teachers’

pedagogical facilitation

Platform based online learning

Teacher- directed live

streaming

Student- centered Video lessons based flipped learning

Digital TV

Analogue TV

Interactive Radio

One- way Radio

Textbooks &

print learning material

packages

Individual tools and applications

 Live broadcasts

 Pre-recorded broadcasts

 Edutainment programs

 Radio broadcasts

 Interactive radio instruction

 Learning podcasts

(5)

Distance learning during COVID-19 school closures

Digital divide: Delivery side + school-based & household access

Physical schools

Classes at Home

X

Content readiness

Pedagogical facilitation

readiness Content

platforms or LMS Curricular

courses and resources

Live streaming lessons or

TV/radio broadcasting

Learning Management

Systems

Collaborative tools

Virtual classes, labs

or Makers spaces Assessment

tools and credentialing

Data

management tools

Open sources and content curation tools

(6)

Content platforms

or LMS Curricular

courses and resources

Live streaming lessons or

TV/radio broadcasting

Learning Management

Systems

Collaborative tools

Virtual classes, labs

or Makers spaces Assessment

tools and credentialing

Data

management tools

Open sources and content curation tools

Classes at Home

Pedagogical facilitation

readiness

Tech-enabled resilient school systems

Content readiness

Tech-enabled open schools

Digital divide: Delivery side + school-based & household access

(7)

A Guiding Framework for Technology-enabled Open Schools

School based blended learning

Home based distance learning

Curricular courses &

supporting resources Teacher and human

facilitators Delivery

technology Access to distance learning

content & coach anytime anywhere

Technology based human

interaction Mobile learning

connection

Design, production, and management

of content Platforms,

delivery media, and individual

tools

Human directed use of technology

Human designed and facilitated pedagogical

activities

(8)

Assessment of digital divide in distance/digital learning

Open and crisis-

resilient schooling

Classes at Home Content

platforms or LMS Curricular

courses and resources

Live streaming lessons or

TV/radio broadcasting

Learning Management

Systems

Collaborative tools Virtual

classes, labs or Makers

spaces Assessment

tools and credentialing

Data managemen

t tools

Open sources and content curation tools

Content • Content platforms or LMS

• Distance

learning courses (all subjects, all grade levels)

• Data platforms

Technology • Connectivity for

platforms

• Household connectivity

• School connectivity

• Individual tools for teachers, students, and parents

Human

• Teachers ICT competency

• Pedagogical skills

• Awareness &

skills of other stakeholders

(9)

Measuring digital divide in distance/digital learning

1. Technology readiness/gaps

1.1 School-based access to (digital) devices and connectivity 1.2 Central online learning platform readiness

1.3 Household access to (digital) devices and connectivity 1.4 Teachers’ access to connectivity and digital devices 2. Human readiness/gaps

2.1 Teachers’ digital skills

2.2 Teachers’ competencies to design and facilitate distance/digital learning 2. 3 Digital skills of students

2.4 Digital skills of parents/care-givers 3. Content readiness/gaps

3.1 Content management platforms

3.2 Content coverage (subject areas, grade levels, media (online, TV, radio)) 3.3 Curriculum alignment and quality assurance

3.4 OER and user-generated content

(10)

Equitable & inclusive Tech delivery: Good practices

o Upgrading bandwidth of online platform (China)

o Solutions for students with special needs (Italy: 89% schools) o Supporting household devices (Lithuania)

o Zero-rate educational traffic (Indonesia, South Africa, Sri Lanka) or Free mobile data (Maldives )

Access Usage Effects

(11)

Universal accessibility to curricular courses : Good practices

o Government-led self development

o Government-validated private courses o Open Educational Resources

o Language consideration (New Zealand TV channels in English & Māori)

o Home based reading materials: Global Digital Library;

Translate a story

Access Usage Effects

(12)

Education purposes and expected learning outcomes of different courses

Commercial courses

Government-led courses during COVID-19

Government-led MOOCS during normal situations Teacher-student

social caring and fostering of values

X X

Expanded access to

education X X

Continuity of learning and reduced drop-out

X

Extended and enriched learning opportunities

X

Curriculum aligned

credits or Degrees X ? X

Job-related Micro-

credentials X ? ?

(13)

Aims and business models of diverse online or distance learning courses

Fee-charging service for degrees/certificates

Free introductory lessons Fee-charging advanced

lessons

Inclusive accessibility Free courses for all students

Quality blended learning

Commercial providers:

Commercial goods

Government providers:

A public/common good Government-

certified commercial

courses

(14)

Monitoring and mitigating ‘digital dropout’ and digital disengagement:

o Centralized monitoring and mitigation (Italy: monitoring survey ; Saudi Arabia)

o Post-pandemic remedial courses (Summer camps: France)

Home support to reduce disengagement:

o More frequent formative assessment

o Guidance for teachers (Finland …) & parents (Armenia); Free-toll hotline (UAE)

o Supporting teachers’ peer learning (Estonia) o Teacher-parent communities (Peru)

o Safe caring spaces or funds to hire private caregivers

Digital skills and competencies to ensure effective distance/online learning

Access Usage Effects

(15)

Costing model of digital learning

Item Existing digital learning capitals Incremental cost to achieve

expected result (per student) Share per capita per year of general internet

infrastructure e.g., USD40/capita

Current bandwidth Expected broadband

(USD 40) Share per capita of annual cost of internet data,

USD200/capita/year

Current cost of internet data Zero/lower cost for education data (USD 200)

Share per student of school computer + school internet connectivity + peripheral devices (estimate total X ratio of computer/student)

Current computer/student ratio

Current school bandwidth

Expected computer/student ratio (e.g., 1/5)

Expected school bandwidth (USD 800)

Share per student of national platforms

(capital costs + annual cost or technology repairs and maintenance + human costs)

Current technology capabilities (accommodate synchronous visits of % teachers and students)

Expected technology capabilities (accommodate synchronous visits of all teachers)

(USD 4)

Share per student of inclusive tools (USD 1)

Share per student of digital/distance learning courses (capital costs + annual cost or technology repairs and maintenance + human costs)

Current management and coverage of courses (% grade levels, % subject area)

Expected management and coverage of courses (all grade levels, all subject area)

(USD 50)

Teacher training and support costs

(annual teacher training costs per teachers X teacher/student ratio)

Capital costs of existing teacher training (% teachers trained)

All teachers trained, and updating training every 3-4 years (USD 5)

Total USD 1100/student X number of

students – existing capital

(16)

https://mlw2020.org/#/home

(17)

Thank you

[email protected]

https://en.unesco.org/themes/ict-education https://mlw2020.org

https://aiedforum.org/#/home

References

Related documents

u Re-Envisioning Blended Instruction u Implementing Rigorous Flipped Instruction u Developing Authentic Learning Experiences u Authentic Assessment and Accountability in a

Abbreviations: AC, adaptation costs; CBA, cost benefit analysis; C C , capital costs; C CM , coastal maintenance cost; C IM , inland maintenance costs; DC, damage costs; d,

Year Capital Cost Annual Maintenance Cost* Discount Factor 12% Present Value of Annual Total Cost Accumulated Present Value Total Cost Capital Recovery Factor Equivalent Av.. ---

R Price over Levelized Cost [Unitless] = Renewable Electricity Selling Price ÷ [(Renewable Annual Capital Costs + Renewable Fixed Maintenance Costs) ÷ R Cap Utilization +..

Besides, having recognized as “The project of distance learning companions” through caring for the weak and vulnerable in the society try to reduce the gap in digital divide

Put another way, solving the ERO problem using the dynamic programming approach requires all costs (such as annual O&M costs including all repairs, regular maintenance and

An earlier meta-analysis of distance learning applications (Bernard et al., 2004) reported that asynchronous distance education (which included traditional correspondence courses and

PWCS provides student take-home digital devices as an “optional service.” Parents/guardians and students must complete the “Digital Device Student Loan Agreement” form. Students